Next Article in Journal
Association between Glasgow Coma Scale in Early Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Development of Delayed Neurological Sequelae: A Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Surgery for T4 Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients: Determinants of Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering of Adult Glioma Vulnerabilities through Expression Pattern Analysis of GABA, Glutamate and Calcium Neurotransmitter Genes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(4), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040634
by Choongun Ryu 1, Geun Joo Choi 1, Yong Hun Jung 1, Chong Wha Baek 1, Choon Kyu Cho 2 and Hyun Kang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(4), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040634
Submission received: 7 February 2022 / Revised: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 10 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Postoperative Complications and Personalized Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Author
I read this article as titled "Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks in cesarean delivery".
The design of the study is well understood and the description was detail oriented.
The author has been able to discuss this challenge of caring for these patients.
The subject was also somehow new and more practices need to be done.
In my opinion the study was almost perfect.
Sincerely

Author Response

Dear Author

I read this article as titled "Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks in cesarean delivery".The design of the study is well understood and the description was detail oriented.
The author has been able to discuss this challenge of caring for these patients.
The subject was also somehow new and more practices need to be done.
In my opinion the study was almost perfect.
Sincerely

Our response: We sincerely appreciate to reviewer’s good comment on our work. Your support will be greatly helpful to our future study. Thank you once more. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Hi,
The literature on this subject is very well summarized.
The information in figure 3 and figure 4 is not read.
The analysis of the studies is very difficult, but they are analyzed very well.
Good luck with your work.

Author Response

Hi,
The literature on this subject is very well summarized.
The information in figure 3 and figure 4 is not read.
The analysis of the studies is very difficult, but they are analyzed very well.
Good luck with your work.

Our response: We sincerely appreciate to reviewer’s good comment on our work. Your support will be greatly helpful to our future study. Thank you once more.

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

I read your work with great interest and I'd like to congratulate with you. It is a very well written paper, with an accurate design and of major interest.

I believe it should undergo a minor spelling and grammar revision, but in my opinion it is a work of great value.

Author Response

Dear Authors,

I read your work with great interest and I'd like to congratulate with you. It is a very well written paper, with an accurate design and of major interest.

I believe it should undergo a minor spelling and grammar revision, but in my opinion it is a work of great value.

Our response: We sincerely appreciate to reviewer’s good comment on our work. Your support will be greatly helpful to our future study. I got a native English editing service. Thank you once more.

Back to TopTop