Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Mindfulness and Positive Strengthening mHealth Interventions for the Promotion of Subjective Emotional Wellbeing and Management of Self-Efficacy for Chronic Cardiac Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Patients with COPD-Obstructive Sleep Apnea Overlap Syndrome: Time for Action?
Due to planned maintenance work on our platforms, there might be short service disruptions on Saturday, December 3rd, between 15:00 and 16:00 (CET).
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Decreased Pulse Wave Velocity in a Systemic Sclerosis Population: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Study

Department of Health Sciences, “Magna Græcia” University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, “Magna Græcia” University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(12), 1952;
Received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 17 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 24 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Medicine, Cell, and Organism Physiology)


Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by organ and tissue fibrosis in which the incidence of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events is increased, although the exact underlying mechanism remains unclear. Arterial stiffness is a marker of vascular damage that can predict cardiovascular events; therefore, this study aimed to assess the augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV), markers of stiffness, in a Systemic Sclerosis population and to detect potentially associated variables. Fourteen female Systemic Sclerosis patients and 14 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. Demographic, anthropometric, sero-hematological parameters and disease characteristics were collected for each participant. Arterial stiffness was evaluated using an applanation tonometry system. No differences were found between groups, except for BMI, fasting blood glucose, red blood cells count, hemoglobin, and treatment. Patients had increased augmentation index than the controls (p = 0.008). PWV was significantly decreased in SSc patients compared with the controls (p = 0.007). PWV was correlated with age (r = 0.462; p = 0.048) and BMI (r = 0.458; p = 0.050). Finally, patients with no specific auto-antibody pattern had greater AIx than those expressing anticentromere antibodies. Our study demonstrated that SSc patients had greater AIx, but lower PWV than the controls. In addition, few variables were correlated to arterial stiffness. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and to establish medication’s role in modifying cardiovascular risk.

1. Introduction

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a connective autoimmune disease characterized by progressive fibrosis of several organs and tissues, more commonly affecting women [1]. Genetic and environmental factors are considered to underlie the pathophysiology of the disease by initiating a self-amplifying process that eventually leads to fibrosis of the skin and internal organs [2]. A main feature of SSc is the dysfunction of the endothelium and the consequent overproduction of the vasoconstrictor and underproduction of vasodilator factors (ET-1 and NO/prostacyclin, respectively) [3]. A common clinical manifestation is secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon (SRP), a vascular event that could result from microvasculopathy, partially due to endothelial dysfunction [4]. Furthermore, immune system activation leads to the increased production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, auto-antibody production, and macrophage polarization in response to endothelial cell damage and apoptosis [2]. The distinctive fibrotic process derives from multiple interactions between cells, especially fibroblasts and macrophages, and growth factors (TGF-β, PDGF), which determine the accumulation of collagen, elastin, and other extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins [5]. Thus, microvascular changes, immune system activation and fibrosis define the skin and systemic clinical manifestations of SSc [6].
In the early stage of SSc, cardiac dysfunction is frequently occult. However, structural and functional abnormalities may occur as the disease progresses; indeed, late fibrosis determines diastolic and systolic dysfunction, conduction defects, and pericardial involvement [7]. Moreover, microvascular alterations have been associated with ischemic myocardial events [8]. Although the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events is increased in SSc [9], the exact underlying mechanisms remain unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature [10] concluded that the risk of atherosclerosis is increased in SSc compared with a healthy population and atherosclerosis is strongly associated with inflammation, which plays a pivotal role in its initiation and progression [11]. It should be observed that inflammation in SSc is not as remarkable as in other rheumatic diseases. Therefore, unlike systemic lupus erythematosus [12] and rheumatoid arthritis [13], accelerated atherosclerosis has not yet been proven in SSc.
Arterial stiffness (AS) is known to be a marker of vascular damage and is associated with an increased risk for CV diseases (CVD), stroke, and renal disease [14]. Increased stiffness can increase the incidence of arterial obstructions as a consequence of hemodynamic changes [15]. Specifically, it increases systolic afterload, end-systolic wall stress, and finally left ventricle remodeling, while coronary perfusion pressure is reduced [16]. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) is the gold standard for the evaluation of arterial stiffness [17]. PWV is considered as a strong predictor of CV events or mortality, with a greater predictive value in patients with a high-risk disease state [18]. The second main indicator of arterial stiffness is the augmentation index (AIx), a composite parameter depending on PWV, which is also associated with increased risk of CV events [19,20].
Few studies have assessed arterial stiffness in SSc patients and the reported findings are contradictory. Therefore, this study aimed to define the presence of macrovascular damage in a cohort of SSc patients compared with a control group by the non-invasive measurement of arterial stiffness. Further investigations were carried out to identify worthwhile correlated variables with arterial stiffness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort

We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study analyzing the clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic parameters of 14 consecutive Caucasian outpatients with SSc, matched for age and sex with 14 controls. Patients attending the Day Hospital of Rheumatology at the University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro who met the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria for the diagnosis of SSc [21] were enrolled. All subjects aged ≥ 18 years were considered eligible for the study, while individuals with arrhythmias were excluded. At the time of enrollment, patients underwent a clinical interview, physical examination, sero-hematological features, and disease assessment including disease duration, auto-antibody pattern and current treatment. Anthropometric evaluation including height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) was performed. Traditional CV risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking habit) were collected for all subjects. None had a history of angina, myocardial infarction, or valvular heart disease.

2.2. Laboratory Measurements

All laboratory measurements were performed after a minimum fasting period of 12 h on peripheral blood samples. Serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured by the immunoturbidimetric method with an automated system (CardioPhase hsCRP, Milan, Italy). Fasting blood glucose was measured using the glucose oxidation method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer II; Beckman Instruments, Milan, Italy). Triglyceride and total, low- (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations were measured by enzymatic methods (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was determined using microphotometrical capillary stopped-flow kinetic analysis (Roller 20 LC, Alifax, Padova, Italy). Serum creatinine was evaluated using the Roche Creatinine Plus assay (Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Renal function, expressed by e-GFR, was obtained according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration group equation [22].
Antinuclear auto-antibody (ANA) levels were determined by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) (Helios®, AESKU Diagnostics, Wendelsheim, Germany); anti-Scl70 by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) (Zenit RA Analyzer, Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy); anticentromere antibodies (ACA) were detected by IIF (Helios®, AESKU Diagnostics, Wendelsheim, Germany), finally, anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies were determined by the ELISA kit (INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.3. Arterial Stiffness Assessment

All subjects underwent measurements performed by the same trained physician who was blinded to the protocol. Hemodynamic data were obtained using a validated system (Sphygmocor™; AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) that implies a high-fidelity applanation tonometry (Millar). An integrated software directly analyzed the recorded waves. First, after 30 min of rest, blood pressure was obtained through a non-invasive, automatic recording of the brachial artery at the dominant arm (Dinamap Compact T; Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd., Newport, UK). Measurements were obtained with the patient in the supine position, in a temperature-controlled room. The central pressure wave and pressures were directly derived from the measurement of twenty sequential radial artery waveforms using a validated transfer function [23]. Pulse wave determinations were considered reliable only if the peak and bottom variation values of the waves were <5%.
The derived systolic central wave was used to define P1, the first systolic peak due to left ventricular ejection and P2, the second systolic peak caused by pulse wave reflection. AIx was derived using the formula: (AP/pulse pressure (PP)) × 100, where the augmentation pressure (AP) is the difference between P2 and P1 and PP is the difference between the systolic and diastolic pressure. As AIx depends on the pulse wave velocity, heart rate and the amplitude of the reflected wave were recorded. The aortic cf-PWV was calculated using common carotid and femoral artery wave measurements. The following formula: PWV (m/s) = distance/time was used. Distance is the length between the carotid and femoral pulse site, whereas time refers to the wave transit. In detail, the pulse transit time from the carotid to the femoral artery was determined by measuring the R-R’ interval of an ECG performed during the exam. The distance between the sternal notch and the femoral artery was considered to define the path length between the carotid and femoral arteries.

2.4. Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee before collecting data from the patients. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The Declaration of Helsinki principles were used as a guide to conduct the study.

2.5. Data Analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as the mean and standard deviation (SD) (normally distributed data) or as the median and interquartile range (IQR) (non-normally distributed data), as per the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test, and Chi-square test were performed to compare the variables. Among the SSc patients, linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlations between PWV and AIx with the following variables: age, body mass index (BMI), disease duration, arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dyslipidemia, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, ESR, hs-CRP, endothelin receptor antagonists, calcium channel blockers, antiplatelet drug, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists, steroids, β-blockers. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. IBM SPSS® (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) version 26 was used for statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

At the end of the enrollment period, 14 SSc patients and 14 sex- and age-matched controls, all females, were included in the study (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the traditional CV risk factors between the two groups. Patients with SSc had a significantly minor BMI compared to the controls (24 ± 6 vs. 26 ± 2; p = 0.019). The patients’ median disease duration was 11 [5.0–16] years. Concerning the sero-hematological features, the control group had a higher fasting blood glucose (FBG) than the SSc patients (107 [92–130] vs. 86 [83–96], p = 0.014). Moreover, the controls had a higher red blood cell (RBC) count and hemoglobin (HB) than the SSc patients (4.8 [4.4–5.3] vs. 4.3 [4.0–4.5]; p = 0.004 and 13 [12–14] vs. 11 [11–13]; p = 0.014, respectively). All 14 SSc patients were treated with iloprost and, among them, nine subjects received endothelin receptor antagonists.
Regarding the clinical and autoimmunity features of SSc patients, according to LeRoy classification [24], three patients (21%) had limited and 11 (79%) had diffuse Systemic clerosis. Antinuclear antibodies were detected in all patients. Seven patients (50%) did not show specific SSc auto-antibodies, three (21%) presented anticentromere antibodies, three (21%) showed anti Scl-70 antibodies, and only one patient (7%) expressed anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies.

3.2. Arterial Stiffness Assessment

Peripheral and central hemodynamic determinations of the study population are presented in Table 2. Briefly, the measured parameters did not differ between the two groups, except for the augmentation pressure which was significantly higher in SSc patients compared with control subjects (15 [10–24] vs. 7.8 [3.7–15]; p = 0.035).
The augmentation index and cf-PWV were evaluated for each participant as previously described, and the results are presented graphically in Figure 1. As expected, the AIx was increased in the SSc patients more than in the controls (33 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 17, p = 0.008). Interestingly, cf-PWV was significantly reduced in the SSc patients compared with the control group (6.4 ± 2 vs. 9.2 ± 3, p = 0.007).

3.3. Arterial Stiffness-Correlated Factors

The correlation of cf-PWV and AIx with several covariates was assessed by linear regression analysis among the SSc patients (Table 3). Specifically, cf-PWV was correlated with age (r = 0.462; p = 0.048) and BMI (r = 0.458; p = 0.050).
AIx differed among the disease auto-antibodies (Table 4). Namely, patients negative for specific antibodies had increased AIx compared with patients expressing anticentromere antibodies. Moreover, concerning SSc cutaneous subsets, AIx and PWV were slightly increased in the lcSSc patients (p = 0.885 for each).

4. Discussion

Arterial stiffness has been widely correlated with aging, but also with arterial hypertension and diabetes. The underlying process includes a complex interplay between factors, among which are collagen-elastin and metalloprotease (MMP) balance as well as endothelial dysfunction [25].
In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated arterial stiffness in a cohort of 14 female Caucasian SSc patients and 14 female control subjects. The groups did not differ for traditional CV risk factors, and only BMI was slightly lower in SSc patients than in the controls (24 ± 6 vs. 26 ± 2; p = 0.019). Our study showed that patients with SSc had increased AIx compared with the controls (33 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 17, p = 0.008), but not cf-PWV, which was surprisingly lower (6.4 ± 2 vs. 9.2 ± 3, p = 0.007).
In the previous literature, uneven results have been reported. A study conducted by Timar et al. [26] demonstrated that both AIx and PWV were increased in SSc patients compared with a healthy control group, the authors also noted a significant correlation between AS, age, and disease duration. Similar findings have been reported in other studies. In more detail, Sunbul et al. [27] evaluated AS by the oscillometric method and showed that patients with SSc had higher arterial stiffness parameters than the controls, but consistently with our results, AIx and PWV did not differ when the SSc patients were divided into two groups according to the cutaneous subset. In the study performed by Colaci et al. [28], PWV was found to be increased in SSc patients compared with 26 controls, however, the increase in PWV was observed only in patients > 50 years old and no data were provided for the augmentation index. Conversely, in the observational study of G.-S. Ngian et al. [29], AIx was higher in the SSc patients, whereas, although PWV was increased, it did not reach statistical significance. Other studies revealed similar results [30,31].
PWV values play a crucial role in predicting CV events and mortality. Specifically, an increase of 1 m/s of PWV determines a risk increase of total CV events by 14%, CV mortality by 15%, and all-cause mortality by another 15% [32].
To our best knowledge, this is the first study to report a decrease in PWV in SSc patients. However, it should be considered that while PWV is a direct parameter of arterial stiffness, AIx depends on three factors: heart rate, PWV, and the amplitude of the reflected wave. Thus, an increased AIx might be the expression of peripheral microvascular disease, a main hallmark of SSc, suggesting that the small arteries are involved earlier than the large ones. Moreover, we found few correlations between PWV and the variables studied. Specifically, PWV was associated with age (r = 0.462; p = 0.048) and BMI (r = 0.458; p = 0.050). The reported data are in line with the current knowledge defining age and BMI as major determinants of arterial stiffness.
No correlations were found with treatment, although calcium channel blockers and ACE inhibitors resulted in being close to statistical significance (p = 0.052 and p = 0.057; respectively) for correlation with PWV. It is worth noting that the analysis was conducted solely on the 14 patients enrolled in the study, therefore, a larger sample size may detect the correlations more effectively. In a previous study [29], CCB treatment was reported to be directly associated with AIx, while we found a non-significative negative correlation with PWV. Long-term treatment with CCB can decrease the arterial stiffness and prevent its progression by reducing aortic wall remodeling. Moreover, nifedipine has been reported to increase endothelial nitric oxide production [33], which is impaired in SSc. Recently updated guidelines on SSc treatment recommend CCBs as first-line therapy for Raynaud’s phenomenon [34]. It must be observed that in our study, all 14 patients were treated with iloprost, which is a potent vasodilator and may impact, to some extent, the arterial stiffness. However, so far, its role has not been investigated. In a trial [35], the prostacyclin analogue beraprost has been shown to prevent the development of arterial stiffness in patients with cerebral infarction. The role of prostacyclin analogues cannot be excluded; thus, it needs to be investigated more carefully.
The current study has some limitations. The AS parameters were statistically different between the two groups, however, only a few correlations with the demographic and clinical variables were found. This could be explained by the limited number of enrolled subjects; therefore, a larger sample size will be necessary to detect further associations. Moreover, as the cross-sectional design of the study prevented the definition of causality, longitudinal protocols should be carried out to better define and investigate the predictive value of arterial stiffness for cardiovascular events in SSc patients as well as the role of treatment in modifying AS measurements. Finally, this was a single-center study including all-female Caucasian patients, therefore, generalization of the findings remains to be determined.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our results support the evidence of an increased AIx, but not PWV, in SSc patients. In addition to the correlations found for PWV with both age and BMI, treatment might have some impact on the AS of these patients, therefore, an in-depth analysis is required. Arterial stiffness measurement may be a reliable and reproducible method for identifying macrovascular involvement in patients with SSc, being relevant in the clinical setting due to its predictive value of CV events.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and R.D.G.; Validation, F.S.I., V.C. (Velia Cassano), A.S. and R.D.G.; Formal analysis, F.S.I.; Investigation, R.G., S.D.N., S.N., G.A., V.C. (Valentino Condoleo), K.B., D.C., B.C. and S.M.; Data curation, F.S.I. and V.C. (Velia Cassano); Writing—original draft preparation, F.S.I., R.G., S.D.N., V.C. (Velia Cassano) and G.A.; Writing—review and editing, F.S.I. and M.M.; Supervision, A.S. and R.D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro (protocol code 205/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the sensitive information in the database.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Valentini, G.; Black, C. Systemic sclerosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2002, 16, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cutolo, M.; Soldano, S.; Smith, V. Pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis: Current understanding and new insights. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mostmans, Y.; Cutolo, M.; Giddelo, C.; Decuman, S.; Melsens, K.; Declercq, H.; Vandecasteele, E.; De Keyser, F.; Distler, O.; Gutermuth, J.; et al. The role of endothelial cells in the vasculopathy of systemic sclerosis: A systematic review. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017, 16, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cutolo, M.; Smith, V.; Furst, D.E.; Khanna, D.; Herrick, A.L. Points to consider-Raynaud’s phenomenon in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2017, 56 (Suppl. S5), v45–v48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brown, M.; O’Reilly, S. The immunopathogenesis of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2019, 195, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Denton, C.P.; Khanna, D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 2017, 390, 1685–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kahan, A.; Allanore, Y. Primary myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2006, 45 (Suppl. S4), iv14–iv17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lambova, S. Cardiac manifestations in systemic sclerosis. World J. Cardiol. 2014, 6, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, H.; Ng, K.R.; Low, A.H.L. A qualitative systematic review of the prevalence of coronary artery disease in systemic sclerosis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 18, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Au, K.; Singh, M.K.; Bodukam, V.; Bae, S.; Maranian, P.; Ogawa, R.; Spiegel, B.; McMahon, M.; Hahn, B.; Khanna, D. Atherosclerosis in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 2078–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, Y.; Xian, X.; Wang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Chen, Q.; Han, X.; Tang, D.; Chen, R. Research Progress on the Relationship between Atherosclerosis and Inflammation. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bichile, T.; Petri, M. Prevention and management of co-morbidities in SLE. Presse Med. 2014, 43, e187–e195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choy, E.; Ganeshalingam, K.; Semb, A.G.; Szekanecz, Z.; Nurmohamed, M. Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: Recent advances in the understanding of the pivotal role of inflammation, risk predictors and the impact of treatment. Rheumatology 2014, 53, 2143–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cassano, V.; Crescibene, D.; Hribal, M.L.; Pelaia, C.; Armentaro, G.; Magurno, M.; Toscani, A.; Miceli, S.; Andreozzi, F.; Maio, R.; et al. Uric Acid and Vascular Damage in Essential Hypertension: Role of Insulin Resistance. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Townsend, R.R.; Wilkinson, I.B.; Schiffrin, E.L.; Avolio, A.P.; Chirinos, J.A.; Cockcroft, J.R.; Heffernan, K.S.; Lakatta, E.G.; McEniery, C.M.; Mitchell, G.F.; et al. Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular Research on Arterial Stiffness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2015, 66, 698–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ikonomidis, I.; Makavos, G.; Lekakis, J. Arterial stiffness and coronary artery disease. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2015, 30, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milan, A.; Zocaro, G.; Leone, D.; Tosello, F.; Buraioli, I.; Schiavone, D.; Veglio, F. Current assessment of pulse wave velocity: Comprehensive review of validation studies. J. Hypertens. 2019, 37, 1547–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhong, Q.; Hu, M.J.; Cui, Y.J.; Liang, L.; Zhou, M.M.; Yang, Y.W.; Huang, F. Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Angiology 2018, 69, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Avolio, A.P.; Van Bortel, L.M.; Boutouyrie, P.; Cockcroft, J.R.; McEniery, C.M.; Protogerou, A.D.; Roman, M.J.; Safar, M.E.; Segers, P.; Smulyan, H. Role of pulse pressure amplification in arterial hypertension: Experts’ opinion and review of the data. Hypertension 2009, 54, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nürnberger, J.; Keflioglu-Scheiber, A.; Opazo Saez, A.M.; Wenzel, R.R.; Philipp, T.; Schäfers, R.F. Augmentation index is associated with cardiovascular risk. J. Hypertens. 2002, 20, 2407–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van Den Hoogen, F.; Khanna, D.; Fransen, J.; Johnson, S.R.; Baron, M.; Tyndall, A.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Naden, R.P.; Medsger, T.A., Jr.; Carreira, P.E.; et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A.; Schmid, C.H.; Zhang, Y.; Castro, I.I.I.A.F.; Feldman, H.I.; Kusek, J.W.; Eggers, P.; Van Lente, F.; Greene, T.; et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pauca, A.L.; O’Rourke, M.F.; Kon, N.D. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension 2001, 38, 932–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. LeRoy, E.C.; Black, C.M.; Fleischmajer, R.; Jablonska, S.; Krieg, T.; Medsger, T.A., Jr.; Rowell, N.; Wollheim, F. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): Classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J. Rheumatol. 1988, 15, 202–205. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shirwany, N.A.; Zou, M. Arterial stiffness: A brief review. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2010, 31, 1267–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tímár, O.; Soltesz, P.; Szamosi, S.; Der, H.; Szanto, S.; Szekanecz, Z.; Szuecs, G. Increased arterial stiffness as the marker of vascular involvement in systemic sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 1329–1333. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sunbul, M.; Tigen, K.; Ozen, G.; Durmus, E.; Kivrak, T.; Cincin, A.; Kepez, A.; Atas, H.; Direskeneli, H.; Basaran, Y. Evaluation of arterial stiffness and hemodynamics by oscillometric method in patients with systemic sclerosis. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2013, 125, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Colaci, M.; Giuggioli, D.; Manfredi, A.; Sebastiani, M.; Coppi, F.; Rossi, R.; Ferri, C. Aortic pulse wave velocity measurement in systemic sclerosis patients. Reumatismo 2012, 64, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ngian, G.-S.; Sahhar, J.; Wicks, I.P.; Van Doornum, S. Arterial stiffness is increased in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional comparison with matched controls. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2014, 32, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  30. Peled, N.; Shitrit, D.; Fox, B.D.; Shlomi, D.; Amital, A.; Bendayan, D.; Kramer, M.R. Peripheral arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in idiopathic and scleroderma associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Rheumatol. 2009, 36, 970–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roustit, M.; Simmons, G.H.; Baguet, J.-P.; Carpentier, P.; Cracowski, J.-L. Discrepancy between simultaneous digital skin microvascular and brachial artery macrovascular post-occlusive hyperemia in systemic sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 1576–1583. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vlachopoulos, C.; Aznaouridis, K.; Stefanadis, C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 1318–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vaja, V.; Ochodnicky, P.; Krenek, P.; Klimas, J.; Bajuszova, Z.; Kyselovic, J. Rapid large artery remodeling following the administration and withdrawal of calcium channel blockers in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 619, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kowal-Bielecka, O.; Fransen, J.; Avouac, J.; Becker, M.; Kulak, A.; Allanore, Y.; Distler, O.; Clements, P.; Cutolo, M.; Czirjak, L.; et al. Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nakayama, T.; Hironaga, T.; Ishima, H.; Maruyama, T.; Masubuchi, Y.; Kokubun, S. The prostacyclin analogue beraprost sodium prevents development of arterial stiffness in elderly patients with cerebral infarction. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2004, 70, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Augmentation Index (Alx) and Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave velocity (cf-PWV) in SSc patients (in black) and controls (in grey). Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). The p-values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test non-parametric test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Augmentation Index (Alx) and Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave velocity (cf-PWV) in SSc patients (in black) and controls (in grey). Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). The p-values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test non-parametric test (** p < 0.01).
Jpm 12 01952 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
(n = 14)
SSc Patients
(n = 14)
Demographic and Anthropometric
Age (years)60 ± 461 ± 130.836
Gender, female14 (100)14 (100)-
BMI (kg/m2)26 ± 224 ± 60.019
Disease Duration (years)-11 [5.0–16]-
Risk Factors
Smoking habit, yes (%)5 (36)5 (36)0.999
AH, yes (%)7 (50)8 (57)0.705
T2DM, yes (%)5 (36)4 (29)0.686
Dyslipidemia, yes (%)6 (43)4 (29)0.430
CVD familiarity, yes (%)6 (43)4 (29)0.430
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)189 [167–218]170 [128–197]0.094
LDL (mg/dL)117 [96–139]100 [80–115]0.125
HDL (mg/dL)61 [50–77]56 [45–63]0.329
Triglycerides (mg/dL)107 [62–133]107 [69–151]0.667
FBG (mg/dL)107 [92–130]86 [83–96]0.014
ESR (mm/h)22 [18–22]18 [7.5–27]0.541
CRP (mg/L)3.2 [2.0–5.3]3.2 [3.2–10]0.227
RBC (×103/μL)4.8 [4.4–5.3]4.3 [4.0–4.5]0.004
WBC (×106/μL)6.2 [5.9–8.5]6.4 [5.1–7.6]0.454
HB (g/dL)13 [12–14]11 [11–13]0.014
PLT (×103/μL)245 [204–293]223 [187–242]0.164
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.71 [0.59–0.88]0.72 [0.64–0.99]0.511
e-GFR93 [69–103]94 [56–100]0.701
Iloprost, yes (%)0 (0)14 (100)1.21 × 10−7
ERA, yes (%)0 (0)9 (64)2.71 × 10−4
CCB, yes (%)8 (57)4 (29)0.127
Β-blockers, yes (%)0 (0)5 (36)0.014
Antiplatelet drug, yes (%)8 (57)10 (71)0.430
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, yes (%)6 (43)4 (29)0.430
ACE inhibitors, yes (%)2 (14)6 (43)0.094
Angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists, yes (%)0 (0)2 (14)0.142
Steroids, yes (%)0 (0)7 (50)0.002
Abbreviations: SSc: Systemic Sclerosis; BMI: body mass index; AH: arterial hypertension; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; CVD: cardiovascular disease; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; FBG: fasting blood glucose; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP: C-reactive protein; RBC: red blood cell; WBC: white blood cell; HB: hemoglobin; PLT: platelet; e-GFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ERA: endothelin receptor antagonists; CCB: calcium channel blockers; ACE inhibitors: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Table 2. Peripheral and central hemodynamic determinations of the study group.
Table 2. Peripheral and central hemodynamic determinations of the study group.
(n = 14)
SSc Patients
(n = 14)
HR, bpm68 [63–73]70 [67–77]0.541
sBP, mmHg128 [112–143]123 [119–147]0.603
dBP, mmHg74 [60–87]77 [73–80]0.482
PP, mmHg51 [45–62]47 [44–67]0.946
Central-sBP, mmHg122 [111–142]117 [113–134]1
Central-dBP, mmHg78 [72–84]79 [75–82]0.635
Central-PP, mmHg44 [38–61]41 [35–57]0.635
AP7.8 [3.7–15]15 [10–24]0.035
Abbreviations: SSc: Systemic Sclerosis; HR: heart rate; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure; AP: augmentation pressure.
Table 3. Correlations between the variables and arterial stiffness parameters in the SSc patients.
Table 3. Correlations between the variables and arterial stiffness parameters in the SSc patients.
Augmentation Indexcf-Pulse Wave Velocity
Disease duration0.0610.418−0.1240.336
Total Cholesterol−0.4140.0700.1510.304
Antiplatelet drug0.0820.3900.1660.286
HMG-CoA reductase
ACE inhibitors0.1710.2800.4410.057
Abbreviations: SSc: Systemic Sclerosis; BMI: body mass index; AH: arterial hypertension; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP: C-reactive protein; ERA: endothelin receptor antagonists; CCB: Calcium channel blockers; ACE inhibitors: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Table 4. Arterial stiffness measurement in the clinical and serological subtypes of SSc patients.
Table 4. Arterial stiffness measurement in the clinical and serological subtypes of SSc patients.
(n = 7)
(n = 3)
(n = 3)
AIx37 ± 526 ± 228 ± 40.040 *
cf-PWV7 ± 27 ± 25 ± 10.234
(n = 3)
(n = 11)
AIx34 ± 533 ± 80.885
cf-PWV7 ± 36 ± 20.885
Abbreviation: AIx: augmentation index; cf-PWV: carotidal-femoral pulse wave velocity; ACA: anticentromere antibodies; RNAPIII: anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies; Scl70: anti-topoisomerase I antibodies; lcSSc: limited cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis; dcSSc: diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis. * Negative vs. ACA: p = 0.020.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iaquinta, F.S.; Grosso, R.; Di Napoli, S.; Cassano, V.; Naty, S.; Armentaro, G.; Massimino, M.; Condoleo, V.; Barbara, K.; Crescibene, D.; Caroleo, B.; Miceli, S.; Sciacqua, A.; Grembiale, R.D. Decreased Pulse Wave Velocity in a Systemic Sclerosis Population: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Study. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1952.

AMA Style

Iaquinta FS, Grosso R, Di Napoli S, Cassano V, Naty S, Armentaro G, Massimino M, Condoleo V, Barbara K, Crescibene D, Caroleo B, Miceli S, Sciacqua A, Grembiale RD. Decreased Pulse Wave Velocity in a Systemic Sclerosis Population: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(12):1952.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iaquinta, Francesco Salvatore, Roberta Grosso, Stefania Di Napoli, Velia Cassano, Saverio Naty, Giuseppe Armentaro, Mattia Massimino, Valentino Condoleo, Keti Barbara, Daniele Crescibene, Benedetto Caroleo, Sofia Miceli, Angela Sciacqua, and Rosa Daniela Grembiale. 2022. "Decreased Pulse Wave Velocity in a Systemic Sclerosis Population: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Study" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 12: 1952.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop