Next Article in Journal
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Have We Come Full Circle?
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Personalized Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High Throughput Genetic Characterisation of Caucasian Patients Affected by Multi-Drug Resistant Rheumatoid or Psoriatic Arthritis

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(10), 1618; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101618
by Paola Tesolin 1, Francesca Eleonora Bertinetto 2, Arianna Sonaglia 3, Stefania Cappellani 4, Maria Pina Concas 4,*, Anna Morgan 4, Norma Maria Ferrero 2, Alen Zabotti 3, Paolo Gasparini 1,4, Antonio Amoroso 2, Luca Quartuccio 3 and Giorgia Girotto 1,4
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(10), 1618; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101618
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 30 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This report is very elaborate and of high interest in the field of personalized medicine. However, it has important limitations. On the one hand, the sample of patients under study (difficult-to-treat) is very small (especially psoriatic arthritis) and a comparator group of RA and PsA that do respond to treatment has not been taken into account, in order to appreciate the differences genetics between the two groups, not only with control cohort composed of healthy individuals.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1.      The title of this paper was too long and may be corrected

2.      In the part of introduction, failure of cDMARDs or biologics in PsA and RA should be enhanced. The duration of therapeutic failure should be made from previous papers.

3.  The number of IRB should be given. 

4.      In the part of discussion, RA and PsA were different diseases with different pathogenesis or disease progression.

5.      The finding of drug-resistance gene from RA and PsA was observed in this study, and the author should made adequate discussion about this finding.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The changes made are appropriate to the comments made.

Back to TopTop