Next Article in Journal
Lipoid Pneumonia: HRCT and MRI Spectrum, Diagnostic Pitfalls, and Imaging-Based Diagnostic Workflow—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Asphyxial Mechanisms in Sand Burial, Findings and Diagnostic Challenges—A Case Report and a Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapidly Progressive Medial Calcific Sclerosis in a Dialysis Patient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Sinonasal and Pulmonary Computed Tomography Images Before and After Triple-Combination Therapy in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis Without ΔF508 Mutations

1
AST Ancona, Ospedale di Comunità Maria Montessori di Chiaravalle, Via Fratelli Rosselli 176, 60033 Chiaravalle, Italy
2
Dipartimento Materno Infantile, UOSD Centro di Riferimento Regionale Fibrosi Cistica, Ospedale “San Liberatore”, Viale Risorgimento, 64032 Atri, Italy
3
Dipartimento dei Servizi, UOSD Radiologia Ospedale “San Liberatore”, Viale Risorgimento, 64032 Atri, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2026, 16(11), 1692; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111692 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 April 2026 / Revised: 28 May 2026 / Accepted: 29 May 2026 / Published: 30 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images)

Abstract

Here, we present the case of a 25-year-old patient with G542X and G85E cystic fibrosis mutations who underwent computed tomography examination before and after triple-combination therapy. Clear improvement in sinonasal and lung involvement is visible two years after modulator treatment initiation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about sinonasal improvement demonstrated by computed tomography images in a patient with G542X/G85E mutations.

Figure 1. A 25-year-old patient with G542X and G85E cystic fibrosis mutations performed lung and sinus computed tomography examinations before (a,c) and after (b,d) triple-combination therapy. Computed tomography lung and sinus examinations were performed using a 64-slice scanner (Lightspeed VCT 64, GE, Milwaukee, WI, United States) with patients in supine position and head towards the gantry. The lung scan parameters of computed tomography examinations performed in the caudocranial direction in suspended deep inspiration were as follows: scan range from the lung apices to the diaphragm, 64 × 0.625 mm beam collimation, 100 kVp tube voltage, tube current variable between 20 and 150 mAs, noise index 50, spiral pitch factor 1.375, rotation time 0.5 s, matrix 512 × 512, 1.25 mm slice thickness reconstructions and an increment of 1.25 mm, and coronal and sagittal images for multiplanar reconstructions using an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) protocol with application of 60% ASIR to the raw datasets. The sinus scan parameters were as follows: scan range from the hard palate to above the end of the frontal sinuses, 64 × 0.625 mm beam collimation, 100 kVp tube voltage, 40 mA tube current, 1.25 mm slice thickness reconstructions, and coronal and sagittal images for multiplanar reconstructions, using both bone and soft-tissue reconstruction kernels. Clear improvement in sinonasal and lung involvement is visible two years after modulator treatment initiation. In fact, lung scan after treatment showed mucous plugging and peribronchial thickening reduction, and sinus scan showed paranasal sinuses opacification decrease. For forced expiratory volume in one second, percentage of predicted value was 44 before treatment and 58 two years after its initiation [1,2]. Brody-II score evaluates chest disease involvement assessing mucous plugging, peribronchial thickening, bronchiectasis, parenchyma and hyperinflation, and it was 21 before treatment and 15 two years after its initiation [3]. The not-cystic fibrosis-specific computed tomography modified Lund–Mackay score and the cystic fibrosis-specific Sheikh–Lind computed tomography sinus disease severity scoring system were, respectively, 11 and 9 before treatment, and 8 and 6 two years after its initiation [4,5]. The 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test questionnaire evaluated sinonasal quality of life impairment, and it was 28 before treatment and 16 two years after its initiation [6,7]. Elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor contains two correctors and a potentiator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator channel [8,9,10]. A few years ago, it was indicated for patients 6 years of age and older who had at least one copy of the F508del gene [11]. More recently, it has been authorized for patients aged 2 years old and older who have at least one non-class I mutation [12]. This allows a lot of cystic fibrosis patients to be treated with this highly effective therapy, obtaining clear lung improvements. In fact, elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor treatment was associated with lung function improvement, pulmonary exacerbation reduction, improved gas exchange, enhanced nutritional status and lung transplant reduction [13,14,15]. Computed tomography examinations before and after triple-combination therapy initiation showed a significant improvement in structural lung disease [16]. Moreover, triple-combination therapy was associated with sinonasal disease improvement, and a reduction in the need for endoscopic sinus surgery was reported [17,18,19]. Furthermore, previously published articles reported a reduction in sinus disease severity in computed tomography [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about sinonasal improvement demonstrated by computed tomography images in a patient with G542X/G85E mutations.
Figure 1. A 25-year-old patient with G542X and G85E cystic fibrosis mutations performed lung and sinus computed tomography examinations before (a,c) and after (b,d) triple-combination therapy. Computed tomography lung and sinus examinations were performed using a 64-slice scanner (Lightspeed VCT 64, GE, Milwaukee, WI, United States) with patients in supine position and head towards the gantry. The lung scan parameters of computed tomography examinations performed in the caudocranial direction in suspended deep inspiration were as follows: scan range from the lung apices to the diaphragm, 64 × 0.625 mm beam collimation, 100 kVp tube voltage, tube current variable between 20 and 150 mAs, noise index 50, spiral pitch factor 1.375, rotation time 0.5 s, matrix 512 × 512, 1.25 mm slice thickness reconstructions and an increment of 1.25 mm, and coronal and sagittal images for multiplanar reconstructions using an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) protocol with application of 60% ASIR to the raw datasets. The sinus scan parameters were as follows: scan range from the hard palate to above the end of the frontal sinuses, 64 × 0.625 mm beam collimation, 100 kVp tube voltage, 40 mA tube current, 1.25 mm slice thickness reconstructions, and coronal and sagittal images for multiplanar reconstructions, using both bone and soft-tissue reconstruction kernels. Clear improvement in sinonasal and lung involvement is visible two years after modulator treatment initiation. In fact, lung scan after treatment showed mucous plugging and peribronchial thickening reduction, and sinus scan showed paranasal sinuses opacification decrease. For forced expiratory volume in one second, percentage of predicted value was 44 before treatment and 58 two years after its initiation [1,2]. Brody-II score evaluates chest disease involvement assessing mucous plugging, peribronchial thickening, bronchiectasis, parenchyma and hyperinflation, and it was 21 before treatment and 15 two years after its initiation [3]. The not-cystic fibrosis-specific computed tomography modified Lund–Mackay score and the cystic fibrosis-specific Sheikh–Lind computed tomography sinus disease severity scoring system were, respectively, 11 and 9 before treatment, and 8 and 6 two years after its initiation [4,5]. The 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test questionnaire evaluated sinonasal quality of life impairment, and it was 28 before treatment and 16 two years after its initiation [6,7]. Elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor contains two correctors and a potentiator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator channel [8,9,10]. A few years ago, it was indicated for patients 6 years of age and older who had at least one copy of the F508del gene [11]. More recently, it has been authorized for patients aged 2 years old and older who have at least one non-class I mutation [12]. This allows a lot of cystic fibrosis patients to be treated with this highly effective therapy, obtaining clear lung improvements. In fact, elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor treatment was associated with lung function improvement, pulmonary exacerbation reduction, improved gas exchange, enhanced nutritional status and lung transplant reduction [13,14,15]. Computed tomography examinations before and after triple-combination therapy initiation showed a significant improvement in structural lung disease [16]. Moreover, triple-combination therapy was associated with sinonasal disease improvement, and a reduction in the need for endoscopic sinus surgery was reported [17,18,19]. Furthermore, previously published articles reported a reduction in sinus disease severity in computed tomography [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about sinonasal improvement demonstrated by computed tomography images in a patient with G542X/G85E mutations.
Diagnostics 16 01692 g001

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.T. and P.R.; methodology, C.T., G.C.; M.D.S.; G.L.; D.B. and P.R.; validation, G.L., D.B. and P.R.; data curation, C.T., G.C., M.D.S., D.B. and P.R.; writing—original draft preparation, C.T., G.C.; M.D.S.; G.L.; D.B. and P.R.; validation, G.L., D.B. and P.R.; writing—review and editing, C.T., G.C.; M.D.S.; G.L.; D.B. and P.R.; supervision, G.L., D.B. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. In general, single-patient case reports do not require Institutional Review Board approval, as they are typically not classified as research under regulations in the U.S. and Europe. The work was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Grasemann, H.; Ratjen, F. Cystic Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 389, 1693–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mall, M.A.; Brugha, R.; Gartner, S.; Legg, J.; Moeller, A.; Mondejar-Lopez, P.; Prais, D.; Pressler, T.; Ratjen, F.; Reix, P.; et al. Efficacy and 536 Safety of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children 6 Through 11 Years of Age with Cystic Fibrosis Heterozygous for. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 206, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brody, A.S.; Klein, J.S.; Molina, P.L.; Quan, J.; Bean, J.A.; Wilmott, R.W. High-resolution computed tomography in young patients with cystic fibrosis: Distribution of abnormalities and correlation with pulmonary function tests. J. Pediatr. 2004, 145, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lund, V.J.; Mackay, I.S. Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 1993, 31, 183–184. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheikh, S.I.; Handly, B.; Ryan-Wenger, N.A.; Hayes, D., Jr.; Kirkby, S.E.; McCoy, K.S.; Lind, M. Novel Computed Tomography Scoring System for Sinus Disease in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2016, 125, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hopkins, C.; Gillett, S.; Slack, R.; Lund, V.J.; Browne, J.P. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2009, 34, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, C.M.; Fischer, J.L.; Overdevest, J.B.; Zemke, A.C.; Strand, M.J.; Gudis, D.A.; Kimple, A.J.; Tervo, J.P.; DiMango, E.; Goralski, J.L.; et al. Psychometric validity of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2026, 25, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Boni, A.; d’Aniello, F.; Ubertini, G.; Cappa, M.; Ciciriello, F.; Majo, F.; Cristiani, L.; Alghisi, F.; Montemitro, E.; Bella, S.; et al. Height Velocity in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Under Triple CFTR Modulator Therapy: A Real-Life Monocentric Experience. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dillenhöfer, S.; Schütz, K.; Burkhart, M.; Ellemunter, H.; Kappler, M.; Sieber, S.; Naehrlich, L.; Brinkmann, F.; Sutharsan, S. Long-term impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on small and large airways in people with cystic fibrosis aged ≥6 years: 24-month real-world evidence from the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry. ERJ Open Res. 2026, 12, 00813–02025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hansen, C.M.E.; Zendaky, B.; Zwitserloot, A.M.; van den Bemt, P.M.L.A.; van Boven, J.F.M. Long-Term Adherence to Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in People with Cystic Fibrosis. Pulm. Ther. 2026. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zemanick, E.T.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Davies, J.; Gibson, R.L.; Mall, M.A.; McKone, E.F.; McNally, P.; Ramsey, B.W.; Rayment, J.H.; Rowe, S.M.; et al. A Phase 3 Open-Label Study of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children 6 through 11 Years of Age with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 203, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Terlizzi, V.; Lopes-Pacheco, M. Cystic fibrosis: New challenges and perspectives beyond elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2025, 19, 17534666251323194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Salvatore, D.; Pepe, A. Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Modulators in Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of Registry-Based Evidence. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gifford, A.H.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Davies, J.C.; McNally, P. Update on Clinical Outcomes of Highly Effective Modulator Therapy. Clin. Chest Med. 2022, 43, 677–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dhôte, T.; Grenet, D.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Chatron, E.; Renaud-Picard, B.; Tissot, A.; Macey, J.; Murris-Espin, M.; Bunel, V.; Sermet-Gaudelus, I.; et al. The impact of progressive expansion of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor availability on lung transplant for cystic fibrosis in France. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2026. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hernández-Muñiz, S.; Caballero, P.; Peláez, A.; Solís-García, M.; de Benavides, C.; Collada, J.; Díaz-Lorenzo, I.; Zorzo, C.; Gómez-Punter, R.M.; Girón, R.M. Evolution of Lung Disease Studied by Computed Tomography in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis Treated with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor. J. Imaging 2025, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tagliati, C.; Lanni, G.; Battista, D.; Pantano, S.; Ripani, P. Triple combination CFTR modulator therapy reduces the need for endoscopic sinus surgery in adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2024, 49, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stapleton, A.L.; Kimple, A.; Goralski, J.L.; Beswick, D.M.; Gupta, A.; Li, D.A.; Branstetter, B.F.; Nouraie, S.M.; Shaffer, A.D.; Senior, B.; et al. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor Improves Sinonasal Outcomes in Young Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025, 15, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petitjean, M.; Letierce, A.; Bonnel, A.S.; Reix, P.; Deneuville, E.; Stremler, N.; Luscan, R.; Couloigner, V.; Mely, L.; Bessaci, K.; et al. Beyond the Lung. Impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor on Sinonasal Disease in Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025, 15, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beswick, D.M.; Humphries, S.M.; Balkissoon, C.D.; Strand, M.; Vladar, E.K.; Lynch, D.A.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L. Impact of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Therapy on Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Health Status: Deep Learning CT Analysis and Patient-reported Outcomes. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2022, 19, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beswick, D.M.; Khatiwada, A.; Miller, J.E.; Humphries, S.M.; Wilson, A.; Vladar, E.K.; Lynch, D.A.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L. Impact of highly effective modulator therapy on chronic rhinosinusitis and health status: 2-year follow-up. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2024, 23, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sheikh, S.; Ho, M.L.; Eisner, M.; Gushue, C.; Paul, G.; Holtzlander, M.; Johnson, T.; McCoy, K.S.; Lind, M. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor Therapy for Chronic Sinus Disease in Cystic Fibrosis. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2023, 149, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tagliati, C.; Pantano, S.; Lanni, G.; Battista, D.; Marcucci, M.; Fogante, M.; Argalia, G.; Paci, E.; Pressanti, G.L.; Ying, M.; et al. Sinus Disease Grading on Computed Tomography Before and After Modulating Therapy in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Belg. Soc. Radiol. 2022, 106, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petit, G.; Coudert, A.; Hermann, R.; Truy, E.; Bonjour, M.; Reix, P.; Ayari, S. Effects of Elexacaftor Tezacaftor Ivacaftor on sinonasal imaging in children with cystic fibrosis. Rhinology 2026, 64, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tagliati, C.; Campagna, G.; Di Sabatino, M.; Lanni, G.; Battista, D.; Ripani, P. Sinonasal and Pulmonary Computed Tomography Images Before and After Triple-Combination Therapy in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis Without ΔF508 Mutations. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111692

AMA Style

Tagliati C, Campagna G, Di Sabatino M, Lanni G, Battista D, Ripani P. Sinonasal and Pulmonary Computed Tomography Images Before and After Triple-Combination Therapy in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis Without ΔF508 Mutations. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(11):1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tagliati, Corrado, Giovanna Campagna, Maria Di Sabatino, Giuseppe Lanni, Davide Battista, and Pietro Ripani. 2026. "Sinonasal and Pulmonary Computed Tomography Images Before and After Triple-Combination Therapy in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis Without ΔF508 Mutations" Diagnostics 16, no. 11: 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111692

APA Style

Tagliati, C., Campagna, G., Di Sabatino, M., Lanni, G., Battista, D., & Ripani, P. (2026). Sinonasal and Pulmonary Computed Tomography Images Before and After Triple-Combination Therapy in a Patient with Cystic Fibrosis Without ΔF508 Mutations. Diagnostics, 16(11), 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111692

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop