Next Article in Journal
Senicapoc in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis or Other Progressive Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: Protocol for a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Phase II Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Additional Role of Myocardial Work in Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Severe Aortic Regurgitation Undergoing Aortic Valve Surgery
Previous Article in Special Issue
U-Net Optimization for Hyperreflective Foci Segmentation in Retinal OCT
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Fine Tuning RETFound with Clinically Guided Foveal ROI for Automated DRIL Classification in Diabetic Macular Edema OCT

by
Pavithra Kodiyalbail Chakrapani
1,†,
Preetham Kumar
1,*,
Sulatha Venkataraya Bhandary
2,†,
Geetha Maiya
1,
Shailaja Shenoy
2 and
Steven Fernandes
3,*
1
Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India
3
Department of Computer Science, Design and Journalism, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68187, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2026, 16(11), 1654; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111654
Submission received: 25 March 2026 / Revised: 23 May 2026 / Accepted: 25 May 2026 / Published: 27 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Eye Disease, 4th Edition)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) is an important and supportive biomarker in optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging for diagnosing the extent of diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients and anticipating visual outcomes. But the manual DRIL identification is subject to interobserver bias and requires a lot of time and effort from the experts. This research presents a novel, computerized, and clinically guided approach for the classification of DRIL that leverages the central 1 mm foveal region extracted through the annotations provided by the expert ophthalmologists and investigates the effectiveness of a transformer and Masked Auto Encoder (MAE) based foundation model (RETFound) as the primary approach. Methods: We fine-tuned and validated the RETFound model, utilizing accurate foveal center coordinates provided by the experienced ophthalmologists. Our approach emphasizes the macular region that is significant diagnostically, where DME biomarkers manifest more predominantly. To guarantee robust evaluation, the dataset was divided into 85% training and 15% held-out test sets. We performed 5-fold cross-validation exclusively on the training dataset with baseline, conservative, and moderate fine-tuning strategies, and the final model was evaluated on the independent, unseen test set. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based transfer learning (TL) models (MobileNetV2, EfficientNetB0, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and DenseNet169) were also assessed for comparative evaluation. Results: The RETFound model yielded the best outcomes under the conservative fine-tuning strategy, achieving a mean test accuracy (AC) of 0.9339 ± 0.0036 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9660 ± 0.0028 on the independent held-out test set across the five fold-trained models. The moderate and baseline evaluations achieved comparatively lower outcomes, highlighting the effectiveness of the conservative approach. The RETFound model consistently outperformed CNN models, exhibiting stability and superior generalization for DRIL classification. We performed statistical validation using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and 95% confidence intervals to confirm the robustness of the proposed method, and an ablation analysis showed that the fovea-centered region of interest (ROI) guidance consistently improved results when compared with whole OCT analysis. Conclusions: This research demonstrates that the deep-learning (DL) methods assisted by expert clinical knowledge with an anatomically aligned ROI could provide remarkable results in DRIL detection applications. This work attempts to establish an anatomically relevant framework for computerized DRIL identification that focuses on the highly crucial macular region, possibly helping in faster intervention and improved diagnosis in the management of DME.
Keywords: disorganization of retinal inner layers; diabetic macular edema; optical coherence tomography; deep learning; disease; diabetes; health; transfer learing; biomarker; vision transformer disorganization of retinal inner layers; diabetic macular edema; optical coherence tomography; deep learning; disease; diabetes; health; transfer learing; biomarker; vision transformer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chakrapani, P.K.; Kumar, P.; Bhandary, S.V.; Maiya, G.; Shenoy, S.; Fernandes, S. Fine Tuning RETFound with Clinically Guided Foveal ROI for Automated DRIL Classification in Diabetic Macular Edema OCT. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111654

AMA Style

Chakrapani PK, Kumar P, Bhandary SV, Maiya G, Shenoy S, Fernandes S. Fine Tuning RETFound with Clinically Guided Foveal ROI for Automated DRIL Classification in Diabetic Macular Edema OCT. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(11):1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111654

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chakrapani, Pavithra Kodiyalbail, Preetham Kumar, Sulatha Venkataraya Bhandary, Geetha Maiya, Shailaja Shenoy, and Steven Fernandes. 2026. "Fine Tuning RETFound with Clinically Guided Foveal ROI for Automated DRIL Classification in Diabetic Macular Edema OCT" Diagnostics 16, no. 11: 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111654

APA Style

Chakrapani, P. K., Kumar, P., Bhandary, S. V., Maiya, G., Shenoy, S., & Fernandes, S. (2026). Fine Tuning RETFound with Clinically Guided Foveal ROI for Automated DRIL Classification in Diabetic Macular Edema OCT. Diagnostics, 16(11), 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111654

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop