Next Article in Journal
Endobronchial Valves for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in Severe Emphysema: A Reversible and Non-Surgical Treatment for Patients Who May or May Not Be Candidates for Lung Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying Radiation Exposure Across Cardiac Catheterization Procedures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Automated Cephalometric Points Marking System

1
Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Anomalies, Fredry 10, 60-812 Poznan, Poland
2
Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2026, 16(11), 1638; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111638
Submission received: 1 December 2025 / Revised: 30 April 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 27 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Modern artificial intelligence methods are increasingly used in medical and dental image analysis to support diagnosis and treatment planning. In orthodontics, automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks from X-ray images remains a challenging and clinically relevant task. Methods: This study proposes a multi-model approach for cephalometric landmark detection based on the ALD algorithm and three derived models trained with extended image augmentation techniques. The applied augmentations, including contrast and negative transformations, improved the detection of specific anatomical landmarks. The final detection strategy integrates outputs from all four models, selecting the most accurate prediction for each landmark based on historical performance results. Results: The proposed method was evaluated on real datasets. It achieved a mean radial error (MRE) of 2.12 mm compared to 2.26 mm for the baseline model, and a successful detection rate (SDR) of 72.22% within a 2.5 mm threshold compared to 68.87% for the baseline model. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the ensemble-based approach improves landmark detection accuracy and has the potential to support clinical orthodontic workflows.
Keywords: medical decisions; algorithms; AI; decision support system; cephalometric analysis; deep learning; image processing medical decisions; algorithms; AI; decision support system; cephalometric analysis; deep learning; image processing

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szwarczyńska, K.; Kosmala, E.; Antczak, M.; Domagała, I.; Biedziak, B.; Musiał, J. Automated Cephalometric Points Marking System. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111638

AMA Style

Szwarczyńska K, Kosmala E, Antczak M, Domagała I, Biedziak B, Musiał J. Automated Cephalometric Points Marking System. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(11):1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szwarczyńska, Kaja, Eryk Kosmala, Maciej Antczak, Ivo Domagała, Barbara Biedziak, and Jędrzej Musiał. 2026. "Automated Cephalometric Points Marking System" Diagnostics 16, no. 11: 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111638

APA Style

Szwarczyńska, K., Kosmala, E., Antczak, M., Domagała, I., Biedziak, B., & Musiał, J. (2026). Automated Cephalometric Points Marking System. Diagnostics, 16(11), 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop