Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of the Short-Form BrainOK: An Efficient Digital Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Data-Efficient DRIL Classification in OCT Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small-Bowel Inflammatory Lesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Turkish Population
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Lei et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2056

by
Ian Io Lei
1,2,*,
Camilla Thorndal
3,
Muhammad Shoaib Manzoor
4,
Nicholas Parsons
5,
Charlie Noble
6,
Cristiana Huhulea
1,
Anastasios Koulaouzidis
3,7,8,9 and
Ramesh P. Arasaradnam
1,2,10
1
Institute of Precision Diagnostics & Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
2
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
3
Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
4
Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Hallam St., West Bromwich B71 4HJ, UK
5
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
6
Noblesoft, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3DN, UK
7
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
8
Department of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
9
Department of Surgery, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
10
Leicester Cancer Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(24), 3222; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243222
Submission received: 5 December 2025 / Accepted: 9 December 2025 / Published: 17 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammatory Pathologies)

Abstract Correction

There was an error in the abstract of the original publication [1]. The original publication states: “Overall, for inflammatory bowel disease, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90% (95% CI, 85–93%), 76% (95% CI, 56–90%), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.94–0.97), respectively”. A correction has been made in the abstract as follows:
“Overall, for inflammatory bowel disease, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90% (95% CI, 85–93%), 76% (95% CI, 56–90%), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97), respectively”.

Text Correction

There was an error in Section 3.5, paragraph 2 in the original publication [1]. The original publication states: “An overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.94–0.97) indicates high diagnostic accuracy of CCE for IBD (see Figure 3)”. A correction has been made as follows:
“An overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97) indicates high diagnostic accuracy of CCE for IBD (see Figure 3)”.

Error in Table 1

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Table 1: 0.92 (0.94–0.97). The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1. Overall and subgroup analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of CCE in IBD using a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM).
Table 1. Overall and subgroup analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of CCE in IBD using a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM).
Overall and Subgroup AnalysisPooled Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Pooled Specificity
(95% CI)
Pooled PLR
(95% CI)
Pooled NLR
(95% CI)
Pooled DOR
(95% CI)
SROC-AUC
(95% CI)
IBD overall
(n = 13)
0.90
(0.85–0.93)
0.76
(0.56–0.90)
5.43
(5.39–5.46)
0.107
(0.106–0.108)
50.79
(50.27–51.30)
0.92
(0.87–0.97)
No prokinetics
(n = 3)
0.87
(0.77–0.93)
0.71
(0.27–0.94)
3.04
(−1.07–7.13)
0.18
(0.058–0.31)
16.64
(−14.10–47.37)
NA
(n < 5)
Metoclopramide
(n = 4)
0.93
(0.89–0.96)
0.76
(0.58–0.88)
3.86
(1.50–6.22)
0.09
(0.051–0.13)
42.92
(10.88–74.95)
NA
(n < 5)
Domperidone
(n = 4)
0.91
(0.84–0.95)
0.93
(0.71–0.99)
13.33
(−7.89–34.56)
0.099
(0.044–0.15)
134.67
(−108.65–377.99)
NA
(n < 5)
UC pooled
(n = 7)
0.92
(0.88–0.95)
0.71
(0.35–0.92)
3.19
(−0.24–6.62)
0.11
(0.049–0.16)
30.16
(−14.11–74.43)
0.93
(0.89–0.97)
CCE1 capsule
(n = 4)
0.89
(0.82–0.93)
0.46
(0.44–0.94)
1.64
(−0.54–3.83)
0.24
(−0.16–0.64)
6.89
(−13.61–27.38)
NA
(n < 5)
CCE2 capsule
(n = 4)
0.95
(0.86–0.98)
0.93
(0.17–0.99)
14.54
(−42.6–7.17)
0.052
(0.0078–0.096)
279.62
(−859.73–1419)
NA
(n < 5)
CD pooled
(n = 6)
0.90
(0.85–0.93)
0.88
(0.83–0.91)
7.30
(4.90–9.69)
0.11
(0.061–0.16)
65.75
(30.96–100.55)
0.87
(0.76–0.98)
CCE2 capsule
(n = 4)
0.88
(0.79–0.93)
0.90
(0.84–0.93)
8.74
(5.16–12.31)
0.13
(0.056–0.21)
66.45
(18.34–114.56)
NA
(n < 5)
Crohn’s capsule
(n = 2)
0.93
(0.88–0.96)
0.85
(0.76–0.91)
6.07
(3.21–8.92)
0.08
(0.032–0.13)
75.5
(11.45–139.47)
NA
(n < 5)
CD colitis
(n = 6)
0.85
(0.77–0.90)
0.90
(0.86–0.94)
8.93
(5.19–12.68)
0.17
(0.093–0.24)
54.85
(17.93–89.76)
0.86
(n = too small)
CD terminal ileitis (n = 5)0.95
(0.90–0.97)
0.84
(0.76–0.89)
5.89
(3.49–8.29)
0.059
(0.018–0.10)
99.18
(12.95–185.40)
0.95
(n = too small)
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Lei, I.I.; Thorndal, C.; Manzoor, M.S.; Parsons, N.; Noble, C.; Huhulea, C.; Koulaouzidis, A.; Arasaradnam, R.P. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lei, I.I.; Thorndal, C.; Manzoor, M.S.; Parsons, N.; Noble, C.; Huhulea, C.; Koulaouzidis, A.; Arasaradnam, R.P. Correction: Lei et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2056. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243222

AMA Style

Lei II, Thorndal C, Manzoor MS, Parsons N, Noble C, Huhulea C, Koulaouzidis A, Arasaradnam RP. Correction: Lei et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2056. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(24):3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lei, Ian Io, Camilla Thorndal, Muhammad Shoaib Manzoor, Nicholas Parsons, Charlie Noble, Cristiana Huhulea, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, and Ramesh P. Arasaradnam. 2025. "Correction: Lei et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2056" Diagnostics 15, no. 24: 3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243222

APA Style

Lei, I. I., Thorndal, C., Manzoor, M. S., Parsons, N., Noble, C., Huhulea, C., Koulaouzidis, A., & Arasaradnam, R. P. (2025). Correction: Lei et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2056. Diagnostics, 15(24), 3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop