Next Article in Journal
Maternal BMI and Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Estimated Fetal Growth to Predict Abnormal Birthweight: Results from NICHD Fetal Growth Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Home Spirometry for Post-COVID Recovery: A Clinical Validation Study of an Ultrasonic Device
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Quang Nam Province (Vietnam) from 2020 to 2022—A Study on Serotypes Distribution and Immunology Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy: Awareness of the Increased Incidence of Severe Intrauterine Infection

1
Department of Women and Child Health Sciences and Public Health, Women Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
2
Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(11), 1397; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111397
Submission received: 4 May 2025 / Revised: 26 May 2025 / Accepted: 28 May 2025 / Published: 31 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Diagnostic Virology)

Abstract

In 2024, Europe experienced a significant upsurge in cases of Parvovirus B19 (B19V), the etiological agent of erythema infectiosum, also known as fifth disease. The prevalence of B19V in pregnant women, a particularly vulnerable population, holds critical clinical significance. Typically, B19V follows a well-documented seasonal pattern, with annual epidemics peaking in the spring and larger outbreaks occurring approximately every four years. B19V exhibits a tropism for erythroid precursor cells, potentially resulting in fetal anemia and, in the most severe scenarios, intrauterine demise. Severe in utero infections necessitate intrauterine erythrocyte transfusion (IUT), a highly specialized and technically demanding procedure that is exclusively performed in tertiary-level prenatal care units. This study delineates how the notable increase in B19V infections is also reflected in our prenatal diagnosis unit at Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli (FPG) IRCCS, Rome, Italy. According to our case series, since 2018, B19V has been identified as the second most common cause of fetal anemia during the study period (29%, 6 patients), yet it accounted for the majority of IUT procedures performed in 2024 (16 out of 19 cases, 84.2%). Given the rising incidence of severe intrauterine infections in recent epidemic cycles, healthcare professionals should maintain a high index of suspicion regarding the clinical manifestations of maternal B19V infection and its potential obstetric complications. Further research is imperative to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine screening for B19V immunity in pregnant women and to investigate the long-term neurodevelopmental and clinical outcomes of neonates affected by intrauterine B19V infection.

1. Introduction

Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is a small, single-stranded, non-enveloped DNA virus, recognized as the etiological agent of erythema infectiosum, also known as fifth disease [1,2]. B19V infection predominantly manifests in school-aged children, presenting with a characteristic facial rash termed “erythema infectiosum”, accompanied by mild pyrexia, arthralgia, and cephalalgia [3]; however, it frequently remains asymptomatic, particularly in adults [4]. B19V is primarily disseminated via respiratory droplets; nonetheless, hematogenous transmission through blood and blood-derived products has been documented [3]. The incubation period ranges from 4 to 14 days post exposure, although it may extend up to three weeks in certain cases [5]. In non-immune pregnant women acquiring the infection, the probability of vertical transmission to the fetus ranges between 33% and 51% [6]. B19V exhibits a tropism for erythroid precursor cells, myocardial tissue, and placental endothelium [7]. The infection and subsequent lysis of erythroid progenitor cells makes B19V a potent suppressor of hematopoiesis, culminating in transient aplastic crisis, particularly in the context of underlying hemolysis [8,9]. In immunocompetent adults, aplastic crisis is generally well tolerated, with minimal anemia as the immune system determines promptly the clearance of viral infection. However, the fetus exhibits an increased demand for erythrocytes and a larger erythroid mass, characterized by rapid cellular turnover, explaining why it is highly susceptible to disruptions in erythropoiesis. The fetal liver is the primary hematopoietic organ from 9 to 24 weeks of gestation [5]. The second trimester also sees the most rapid increase in the mass of fetal red blood cells. However, the half-life of fetal red blood cells produced in this period is relatively short, approximately 45–70 days [5]. Therefore, the fetus is extremely vulnerable to any pause in red blood cell production during the second trimester and is more susceptible to the changes caused by parvovirus B19 [10]. This risk is greatly reduced in the third trimester when fetal hematopoiesis migrates to the bone marrow, and red blood cell lifespan increases [5]. Fetal anemia, in conjunction with associated hepatitis, hypoalbuminemia, and myocarditis, may precipitate cardiac insufficiency and subsequent hydrops fetalis [11]. Furthermore, the suppression of platelet precursors and direct cytotoxic effects on megakaryocytes can contribute to fetal thrombocytopenia [12,13]. Severe in utero infections necessitate intervention via intrauterine erythrocyte transfusion (IUT), an invasive procedure conducted exclusively in specialized fetal medicine centers [14]. Typically, a minimum of two IUTs are required to manage severe fetal compromises. The significant incidence of concurrent severe fetal thrombocytopenia may substantially influence procedural outcomes due to an elevated risk of fetal exsanguination [12,15]. Various studies recommend ensuring the availability of compatible platelet concentrates at the time of transfusion, and if fetal platelet levels fall below 50 × 109/L, platelet transfusion should be performed to mitigate the risk of catastrophic hemorrhage [12,15]. Survival rates following IUT for B19V infection range from 67% to 84%, in contrast to 30% to 50% in pregnancies without in utero therapeutic intervention [6]. Prognosis is strongly correlated with the severity of fetal anemia and the presence of hydrops. While IUT enhances survival outcomes, fetuses with advanced hydrops often exhibit suboptimal responses to treatment. In such cases, myocarditis may represent a pivotal determinant of fetal survival [16]. Myocardial dysfunction secondary to viral-induced myocarditis may explain instances where hydrops fails to resolve or exacerbates post IUT. Indeed, blood transfusion may further compromise fetal cardiovascular homeostasis, potentially culminating in fetal demise. Some investigations have identified leukocytosis on cordocentesis blood analysis as a robust biomarker of myocarditis, portending a poor prognosis [17]. Current evidence underscores the necessity of meticulous fetal surveillance in pregnancies complicated by maternal B19V infection. Ultrasound monitoring is imperative for detecting signs of fetal anemia, notably an increased peak systolic velocity of the middle cerebral artery (PSV-MCA) on a Doppler assessment (>1.5 multiples of the median, MoM) and sonographic markers of hydrops (ascites, skin edema, pleural and pericardial effusions, and placentomegaly) [5]. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) guidelines for congenital infections advocate serial ultrasonographic assessment in all women testing positive for B19V-specific IgM antibodies, irrespective of IgG status, to ascertain potential fetal involvement [18]. Notably, serological testing exhibits a considerable false-negative rate (20–40%), particularly in early asymptomatic stages when high viral loads may form immune complexes with B19V-specific antibodies, rendering them undetectable [19]. Therefore, in cases of strong clinical suspicion, despite negative IgM results, molecular diagnostic techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), IgG avidity testing, or amniocentesis for viral DNA detection should be employed [3,18,19]. Once maternal infection is confirmed, weekly PSV-MCA evaluations should be performed, with IUT indicated when PSV-MCA exceeds 1.5 MoM and/or when other sonographic markers of severe fetal anemia (e.g., hydrops) are identified [18]. Continuous fetal surveillance is warranted for a minimum of 8 to 12 weeks post maternal infection [13,14,20,21]. If, after 12 weeks from exposure, no abnormal ultrasound findings suggestive of B19V-related complications are observed, the probability of adverse fetal outcomes is significantly diminished [18,22,23].
Epidemiologically, B19V infections follow a seasonal trend, with annual epidemics peaking in spring and major outbreaks occurring approximately every four years [14]. A clear association exists between epidemic years and an increased incidence of severe intrauterine infections [6,14]. The risk of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) is estimated at 12 per 100,000 pregnancies in non-epidemic periods, surging to 48 per 100,000 during epidemic years [14]. Recent investigations have highlighted the substantial impact of COVID-19-related restrictions on the incidence and seasonal variability of airborne-transmitted viruses, including B19V [24,25]. The marked decline in B19V circulation during the COVID-19 pandemic has likely contributed to diminished population immunity, potentially predisposing individuals to the resurgence of outbreaks in subsequent years [26].

2. The Third-Level Birth Center’s Experience

In 2024, a pronounced upsurge in B19V infections was documented across Europe and the United States, prompting national centers for disease prevention to advise clinicians to maintain a heightened level of clinical vigilance for pregnant women exhibiting suggestive symptomatology or recent exposure to confirmed cases [27]. Similarly, at the Fetal Medicine Unit of Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS in Rome, Italy, we observed a substantial escalation in severe intrauterine B19V infections, with an increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes surpassing prior expectations based on historical data. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all cases undergoing IUT between 2018 and 2024. Throughout the study period, a total of 21 patients received IUT, with 58 invasive procedures performed in total. These interventions were primarily executed by three different senior fetal medicine specialists. The predominant etiology of severe fetal anemia requiring IUT was anti-D alloimmunization, accounting for 57% of patients (12 out of 21). The second most prevalent cause was B19V infection, responsible of severe fetal anemia in 29% of patients (6 out of 21) who received a IUT and they were all recorded in 2024. In 2024, B19V infection emerged as the leading cause of severe fetal anemia necessitating IUT, accounting for 16 out of 19 procedures (84.2%), as illustrated in Table 1. Notably, the highest frequency of IUT procedures was recorded in 2024, with 19 procedures performed, constituting 32.7% of all IUTs conducted throughout the study period. Among these six patients who required a IUT for B19V, in four (Cases 1, 3, 4 and 6) out of the six patients, serological testing for Parvovirus B19 (B19V) was prompted by the immediate presentation of severe signs of fetal anemia, as hydrops fetalis and elevated PSV in the MCA, at the ultrasound. These clinical findings raised suspicion of intrauterine infection and led to a targeted serological investigation. The remaining two patients (Cases 2 and 5) were referred to our fetal medicine unit following confirmed exposure to B19V, in both cases through close contact with their own symptomatic children. For each patient at the admission to the Fetal Medicine Unite, we performed serology IgG and IgM and PCR for B19V, which all produced positive results. For the detection of Parvovirus B19 antibodies, our laboratory employed the LIAISON® Biotrin Parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM Plus panel, a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) designed for the quantitative determination of specific IgG antibodies (expressed in IU/mL) and the qualitative assessment of IgM antibodies (expressed as S/CO) in human serum. The detection of parvovirus B19 DNA was performed using the QIAGEN artus® Parvo B19 PCR kit. As mentioned, B19V-specific IgG antibodies are detected using a quantitative assay, with values exceeding 2.5 IU/mL considered indicative of a positive result, while IgM antibodies are assessed qualitatively, with positivity defined by a signal-to-cut-off (S/CO) ratio greater than 1.10. Parvovirus B19 DNA is detected through a quantitative PCR assay, with a positivity threshold set at >140 IU/mL. The key clinical parameters, sonographic findings, laboratory results, and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by B19V infection in 2024 are summarized in Table 2. Based on our institutional experience, the overall survival rate following IUT was 50%, with three cases of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) and three liveborn neonates. The high rate of adverse outcomes can be related to the severity of case presentation. As detailed in Table 2, among neonates delivered following B19V infection and treated with IUT, the most adverse neonatal outcome was documented in Case 4, who exhibited fetal growth restriction (FGR) and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) at birth. In this patient, B19V infection occurred at an earlier gestational age (18 + 6 weeks), with profound fetal anemia (PSV-MCA 2 MoM) and hydrops fetalis, necessitating a total of five IUTs—the highest number of IUTs performed in a single pregnancy within our case series.

3. Recommendations

In conclusion, clinicians should maintain a high degree of vigilance regarding the clinical presentation and associated risks of B19V infection during pregnancy, particularly in epidemic years. Serological screening for B19V should be considered in pregnant women presenting with febrile illness, exanthema, or debilitating arthralgia; those with documented exposure to individuals infected with B19V; and in any instance where ultrasonographic evaluation reveals fetal hydrops [6]. When Parvovirus B19 infection is confirmed, patients should be promptly referred to a specialized fetal medicine center for appropriate follow-up and timely intervention in the event that severe signs of fetal anemia are detected. Current evidence regarding the long-term prognosis of infected fetuses remains limited; however, according to the latest studies, the risk of abnormal neurodevelopment appears to be low (approximately 10%) in hydropic fetuses and negligible in non-hydropic cases [10,28]. Figure 1 represents a flowchart outlining the proposed strategy for the diagnosis in pregnancies with suspected B19V infection. Further research is warranted to assess the cost-effectiveness of universal screening for B19V immunity in pregnant women, as well as to elucidate the long-term neurodevelopmental and clinical outcomes of neonates affected by intrauterine B19V infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: E.B., A.F., E.T., G.d.M., E.P., M.V.A., F.R., M.D.S. and T.G.; formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—draft preparation, E.T.; writing—review and editing, E.T. and E.B.; supervision, E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli (protocol code DIPUSVSP-21-03-253), approval date is 21 March 2025.

Informed Consent Statement

Our study was conducted using fully anonymized retrospective clinical data, ensuring compliance with the ethical and regulatory requirements of Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all participating patients and study team members for their time spent on this project and the Fondazione Policlino A. Gemelli, IRCCS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cossart, Y.E.; Cant, B.; Field, A.M.; Widdows, D. Parvovirus-like particles in human sera. Lancet 1975, 305, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Anderson, M.J.; Higgins, P.G.; Davis, L.R.; Willman, J.S.; Jones, S.E.; Kidd, I.M.; Pattison, J.R.; Tyrrell, D.A.J. Experimental Parvoviral Infection in Humans. J. Infect. Dis. 1985, 152, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Jong, E.P.; Walther, F.J.; Kroes, A.C.M.; Oepkes, D. Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy: New Insights and Management. Prenat. Diagn. 2011, 31, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Enders, M.; Weidner, A.; Enders, G. Current Epidemiological Aspects of Human Parvovirus B19 Infection during Pregnancy and Childhood in the Western Part of Germany. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007, 135, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dittmer, F.P.; Guimarães, C.D.M.; Peixoto, A.B.; Pontes, K.F.M.; Bonasoni, M.P.; Tonni, G.; Araujo Júnior, E. Parvovirus B19 Infection and Pregnancy: Review of the Current Knowledge. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Russcher, A.; Verweij, E.J.; Maurice, P.; Jouannic, J.-M.; Benachi, A.; Vivanti, A.J.; Devlieger, R. Extreme Upsurge of Parvovirus B19 Resulting in Severe Fetal Morbidity and Mortality. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e475–e476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pasquinelli, G.; Bonvicini, F.; Foroni, L.; Salfi, N.; Gallinella, G. Placental Endothelial Cells Can Be Productively Infected by Parvovirus B19. J. Clin. Virol. 2009, 44, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Broliden, K.; Tolfvenstam, T.; Norbeck, O. Clinical Aspects of Parvovirus B19 Infection. J. Intern. Med. 2006, 260, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Syridou, G.; Spanakis, N.; Konstantinidou, A.; Piperaki, E.; Kafetzis, D.; Patsouris, E.; Antsaklis, A.; Tsakris, A. Detection of Cytomegalovirus, Parvovirus B19 and Herpes Simplex Viruses in Cases of Intrauterine Fetal Death: Association with Pathological Findings. J. Med. Virol. 2008, 80, 1776–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bascietto, F.; Liberati, M.; Murgano, D.; Buca, D.; Iacovelli, A.; Flacco, M.E.; Manzoli, L.; Familiari, A.; Scambia, G.; D’Antonio, F. Outcome of Fetuses with Congenital Parvovirus B19 Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 52, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garcia, A.G.P.; Pegado, C.S.; Cubel, R.D.C.N.; Fonseca, M.E.F.; Sloboda, I.; Nascimento, J.P. Feto-placentary pathology in human parvovirus b19 infection. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 1998, 40, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Segata, M.; Chaoui, R.; Khalek, N.; Bahado-Singh, R.; Paidas, M.J.; Mari, G. Fetal Thrombocytopenia Secondary to Parvovirus Infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 196, 61.e1–61.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Srivastava, A.; Bruno, E.; Briddell, R.; Cooper, R.; Srivastava, C.; Van Besien, K.; Hoffman, R. Parvovirus B19-Induced Perturbation of Human Megakaryocytopoiesis In Vitro. Blood 1990, 76, 1997–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Russcher, A.; Van Boven, M.; Benincà, E.; Verweij, E.J.T.; Molenaar-de Backer, M.W.A.; Zaaijer, H.L.; Vossen, A.C.T.M.; Kroes, A.C.M. Changing Epidemiology of Parvovirus B19 in the Netherlands since 1990, Including Its Re-Emergence after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kosian, P.; Hellmund, A.; Geipel, A.; Bald, R.; Geist, O.-M.; Böckenhoff, P.; Jimenez-Cruz, J.; Deja, M.; Strizek, B.; Berg, C.; et al. Intrauterine Transfusion in 103 Fetuses with Severe Anemia Caused by Parvovirus Infection. A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022, 308, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hichijo, A.; Morine, M. A Case of Fetal Parvovirus B19 Myocarditis that Caused Terminal Heart Failure. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 2014, 463571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olejniczak, O.; Kornacki, J.; Boroń, D.; Gutaj, P.; Iciek, R.; Wender-Ożegowska, E. Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy—Course of the Disease, Fetal Complications and Management Tools: A Case Series and Literature Review. Children 2024, 11, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khalil, A.; Sotiriadis, A.; Chaoui, R.; Da Silva Costa, F.; D’Antonio, F.; Heath, P.T.; Jones, C.; Malinger, G.; Odibo, A.; Prefumo, F.; et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Role of Ultrasound in Congenital Infection. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 128–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bredl, S.; Plentz, A.; Wenzel, J.J.; Pfister, H.; Möst, J.; Modrow, S. False-Negative Serology in Patients with Acute Parvovirus B19 Infection. J. Clin. Virol. 2011, 51, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Attwood, L.O.; Holmes, N.E.; Hui, L. Identification and Management of Congenital Parvovirus B19 Infection. Prenat. Diagn. 2020, 40, 1722–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crane, J.; Mundle, W.; Boucoiran, I.; Gagnon, R.; Bujold, E.; Basso, M.; Bos, H.; Brown, R.; Cooper, S.; Gouin, K.; et al. Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2014, 36, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Morgan-Capner, P.; Crowcroft, N.S.; PHLS Joint Working Party of the Advisory Committees of Virology and Vaccines and Immunisation. Guidelines on the Management of, and Exposure to, Rash Illness in Pregnancy (Including Consideration of Relevant Antibody Screening Programmes in Pregnancy). Commun. Dis. Public Health 2002, 5, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Simms, R.A.; Liebling, R.E.; Patel, R.R.; Denbow, M.L.; Abdel-Fattah, S.A.; Soothill, P.W.; Overton, T.G. Management and Outcome of Pregnancies with Parvovirus B19 Infection over Seven Years in a Tertiary Fetal Medicine Unit. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2009, 25, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Williams, T.C.; Sinha, I.; Barr, I.G.; Zambon, M. Transmission of Paediatric Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eurosurveillance 2021, 26, 2100186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Faiola, S.; Morelli, R.; Casati, D.; Laoreti, A.; Lanna, M.; Savasi, V.M. Impact of Parvovirus B19 Outbreak in a Single Center. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2024, 302, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Messacar, K.; Baker, R.E.; Park, S.W.; Nguyen-Tran, H.; Cataldi, J.R.; Grenfell, B. Preparing for Uncertainty: Endemic Paediatric Viral Illnesses after COVID-19 Pandemic Disruption. Lancet 2022, 400, 1663–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Risks Posed by Reported Increased Circulation of Human Parvovirus B19 in the EU/EEA: Threat Assessment Brief; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagel, H.T.C.; De Haan, T.R.; Vandenbussche, F.P.H.A.; Oepkes, D.; Walther, F.J. Long-Term Outcome After Fetal Transfusion for Hydrops Associated With Parvovirus B19 Infection. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 109, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram for diagnosis in pregnancies with suspected B19V infection.
Figure 1. Flow diagram for diagnosis in pregnancies with suspected B19V infection.
Diagnostics 15 01397 g001
Table 1. IUTs performed at FPG per year from 2018 to 2024 and their cause.
Table 1. IUTs performed at FPG per year from 2018 to 2024 and their cause.
Yearn° IUT Causes
20181210 anti-D alloimmunization
2 idiopathic
20190
20201513 anti-D alloimmunization
2 idiopathic
202153 anti-Kell alloimmunization
2 anti-D alloimmunization
202275 idiopathic
2 anti-D alloimmunisation
20230
20241916 ParvovirusB19
2 anti D alloimmunisation
1 idiopathic
Table 2. Main characteristics of pregnancies complicated by Parvovirus B19 infection that underwent IUT in 2024, such as gestational age (GA) at diagnosis, serology (IgM and IgG) and PCR for B19 at the diagnosis, ultrasonographic features like peak systolic velocity of the middle cerebral artery, the presence (+) or absence (−) of hydrops, gestational age (GA) at the first IUT, how many IUTs were performed for each patients, the localization of the placenta if it was anterior (A) or posterior (P) and the obstetrical outcome. In case of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) (+), we reported the gestational age (GA) of demise.
Table 2. Main characteristics of pregnancies complicated by Parvovirus B19 infection that underwent IUT in 2024, such as gestational age (GA) at diagnosis, serology (IgM and IgG) and PCR for B19 at the diagnosis, ultrasonographic features like peak systolic velocity of the middle cerebral artery, the presence (+) or absence (−) of hydrops, gestational age (GA) at the first IUT, how many IUTs were performed for each patients, the localization of the placenta if it was anterior (A) or posterior (P) and the obstetrical outcome. In case of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) (+), we reported the gestational age (GA) of demise.
Patient n°GA DiagnosisIgM B19V (S/CO)IgG B19V (UI/mLPCR B19V (UI/mL)PSV MCA MoMHydropsGA IUTN° IUT TOT.Placenta IUFDGA Demise Neonatal Outcome
Case 125 + 02.62775,600732.4+253A Born full term, good clinical conditions.
Case 221 + 27.865.57,000,000411.5221 + 21A Born full term, good clinical conditions.
Case 319 + 221.810162,940,500421.68+19 + 51P+19 + 6
Case 418 + 65.8648.209,215,500562+19 + 05P Born at term, with FGR and RDS at birth.
Case 519 + 0 2.6629.1/481.821 + 13P+24 + 3
Case 61238.14.5>70,000,000 2.02+21 + 23A+23 + 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torcia, E.; Familiari, A.; Passananti, E.; Alesi, M.V.; di Marco, G.; Romanzi, F.; De Santis, M.; Ghi, T.; Bevilacqua, E. Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy: Awareness of the Increased Incidence of Severe Intrauterine Infection. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111397

AMA Style

Torcia E, Familiari A, Passananti E, Alesi MV, di Marco G, Romanzi F, De Santis M, Ghi T, Bevilacqua E. Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy: Awareness of the Increased Incidence of Severe Intrauterine Infection. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(11):1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torcia, Eleonora, Alessandra Familiari, Elvira Passananti, Maria Vittoria Alesi, Giulia di Marco, Federica Romanzi, Marco De Santis, Tullio Ghi, and Elisa Bevilacqua. 2025. "Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy: Awareness of the Increased Incidence of Severe Intrauterine Infection" Diagnostics 15, no. 11: 1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111397

APA Style

Torcia, E., Familiari, A., Passananti, E., Alesi, M. V., di Marco, G., Romanzi, F., De Santis, M., Ghi, T., & Bevilacqua, E. (2025). Parvovirus B19 Infection in Pregnancy: Awareness of the Increased Incidence of Severe Intrauterine Infection. Diagnostics, 15(11), 1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop