Next Article in Journal
A New Approach for Gastrointestinal Tract Findings Detection and Classification: Deep Learning-Based Hybrid Stacking Ensemble Models
Previous Article in Journal
The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Biomarkers in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient with Severe Lung Function Impairment Allowed by Gallium-68 Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Case Report

1
Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
2
LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, 29200 Brest, France
3
Inserm, CHRU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Brest, 29238 Brest, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(4), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040718
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 13 February 2023 / Published: 14 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Abstract

:
Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly proposed, especially for patients with poor lung function who are not eligible for surgery. However, radiation-induced lung injury remains a significant treatment-related adverse event in these patients. Moreover, for patients with very severe COPD, we have very few data about the safety of SBRT for lung cancer. We present the case of a female with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 0.23 L (11%), for whom a localized lung tumor was found. Lung SBRT was the only possible treatment. It was allowed and safely performed, based on a pre-therapeutic evaluation of regional lung function with Gallium-68 perfusion lung positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT). This is the first case report to highlight the potential use of a Gallium-68 perfusion PET/CT in order to safely select patients with very severe COPD who can benefit from SBRT.

Figure 1. A 73-year-old female had a very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 0.23 L (11%). The patient received nocturn noninvasive ventilation and permanent oxygenotherapy. She was diagnosed with a lung tumor of the right hilum on chest radiography. On CT, a para-hilar mass of the posterior segment of the right upper lobe was measured to 29 mm × 23 mm in the axial plane (A). This mass was highly hypermetabolic on 18F-FDG PET/CT (B). The lesion was highly suspicious for a primary lung cancer. However, a biopsy was judged to be too risky. Multidisciplinary team meetings were proposed as the only possible therapeutic approach to treat this lesion by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) without histologic confirmation. Lung SBRT is considered to be a viable treatment option even in patients with poor lung function [1]. However, the reported incidence of symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury (grade ≥ 2) in the published data ranges from 9% to 28% [2,3,4,5] and is the most frequent adverse event after lung SBRT. Moreover, for patients with very severe COPD, we have very few data about the safety of SBRT for lung cancer [6,7]. Indeed, most clinical trials of SBRT for lung cancer have only included patients with FEV1 > 0.7 L [6,7]. Furthermore, retrospective studies about outcomes after SBRT in patients with severe COPD had very few patients with FEV1 < 0.7 L [8,9]. Therefore, for a patient with a FEV1 of 0.23 (11%), the therapeutic index was unknown. We decided to evaluate the possibility of treating this tumor with a SBRT protocol of 60 Gy in eight fractions due to the ultra-central localization [10]. This patient benefited from a perfusion PET/CT after the administration of 68Gallium-MAA to precisely evaluate lung function distribution and to assess the potential consequences of radiation therapy on lung function (Figure 2). Lung perfusion PET/CT images showed that a large part of the right lung was non-functional, especially the areas around the lung lesion. Lung functional volumes were delineated using a visually adapted semi-automatic method [11], and were co-registered with radiation plans. When we use this SBRT protocol, the dose constraints to both lungs are the anatomical lung volume receiving at least 26 Gy (V26 Gy) < 10% and the mean dose (Dmean) < 7 Gy [10]. However, these dose constraints have been evaluated in patients with FEV1 > 0.7 L and should be lower in patients with FEV1 < 0.7 L. In our case, the V26Gy (yellow line) to the anatomic lung volume was 4.7% versus only 1.1% to the functional lung volume. Furthermore, the Dmean to the anatomical lung volume was 5.29 Gy versus only 2.68 Gy to the functional lung volume. Based on this functional evaluation with functional lung volumes irradiated significantly below the limit values and in the absence of a therapeutic alternative, we approved the SBRT treatment. At 3 months of treatment, the CT scan showed a partial response to radiotherapy 15 vs. 29 mm (−49%) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) (Figure 3) [12]. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, with three questionnaires about quality of life (QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, and EQ-5D-5L) and with pulmonary function test. The patient experienced no side effects, and spirometry showed a FEV1 of 0.27 L (13%). Lung SBRT is the standard of care to treat inoperable stage 1 and 2 lung cancer [1]. However, the reported incidence of symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury (grade ≥ 2) in the published data ranges from 9% to 28% [1] and is the most frequent adverse event after lung SBRT. Moreover, most retrospective studies and ongoing clinical trials of SBRT for lung cancer have only included patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) > 0.7 L [6,8]. Therefore, for a patient with a FEV1 < 0.7 L, the therapeutic index is unknown. Patients with severe COPD frequently demonstrate high heterogeneity of regional lung function, with non-functional areas alternating with still functional regions, which should be preserved as much as possible. Lung perfusion PET/CT imaging is a novel imaging technique for regional lung function evaluation. Similar to conventional lung perfusion scintigraphy, images are obtained after intravenous administration of macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) particles, which embolize in the pulmonary capillaries according to pulmonary blood flow. However, as compared with lung scintigraphy, these molecules are not radiolabeled with Technetium-99m, but with Gallium-68, a ß+ isotope, allowing image acquisition with PET technology [13]. PET is an intrinsically superior technique for image acquisition, with greater sensitivity and better spatial and temporal resolutions [14,15]. This offers the opportunity to improve the accuracy of lung functional volumes delineation and its integration in thoracic radiation therapy planning. Indeed, unlike surgery, radiation therapy requires a more accurate assessment of the distribution of lung function because radiation doses can be given to both lungs, not just the tumor-affected lobe. Siva et al. demonstrated the feasibility of preserving lung functional volumes in a cohort of 14 patients treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy for NSCLC adapted to 68Ga-perfusion PET/CT [16]. However, SBRT is a more precise and conformal technique that allows the irradiation of smaller volumes of organs at risk (OARs) [17]. To date, no study has evaluated the performance of 68Ga-perfusion PET/CT imaging to personalize lung SBRT planning and dosimetry. In our case, the performance of lung perfusion PET/CT allowed a more accurate assessment of the doses delivered to the functional lung volume at the time of radiotherapy planning than lung perfusion scintigraphy. These data allowed us to improve the prediction of the risk of toxicity in this patient and to evaluate it as very low. This case report illustrates the potential use of a Gallium-68 perfusion PET/CT in order to safely select patients with very severe COPD who can benefit from SBRT.
Figure 1. A 73-year-old female had a very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 0.23 L (11%). The patient received nocturn noninvasive ventilation and permanent oxygenotherapy. She was diagnosed with a lung tumor of the right hilum on chest radiography. On CT, a para-hilar mass of the posterior segment of the right upper lobe was measured to 29 mm × 23 mm in the axial plane (A). This mass was highly hypermetabolic on 18F-FDG PET/CT (B). The lesion was highly suspicious for a primary lung cancer. However, a biopsy was judged to be too risky. Multidisciplinary team meetings were proposed as the only possible therapeutic approach to treat this lesion by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) without histologic confirmation. Lung SBRT is considered to be a viable treatment option even in patients with poor lung function [1]. However, the reported incidence of symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury (grade ≥ 2) in the published data ranges from 9% to 28% [2,3,4,5] and is the most frequent adverse event after lung SBRT. Moreover, for patients with very severe COPD, we have very few data about the safety of SBRT for lung cancer [6,7]. Indeed, most clinical trials of SBRT for lung cancer have only included patients with FEV1 > 0.7 L [6,7]. Furthermore, retrospective studies about outcomes after SBRT in patients with severe COPD had very few patients with FEV1 < 0.7 L [8,9]. Therefore, for a patient with a FEV1 of 0.23 (11%), the therapeutic index was unknown. We decided to evaluate the possibility of treating this tumor with a SBRT protocol of 60 Gy in eight fractions due to the ultra-central localization [10]. This patient benefited from a perfusion PET/CT after the administration of 68Gallium-MAA to precisely evaluate lung function distribution and to assess the potential consequences of radiation therapy on lung function (Figure 2). Lung perfusion PET/CT images showed that a large part of the right lung was non-functional, especially the areas around the lung lesion. Lung functional volumes were delineated using a visually adapted semi-automatic method [11], and were co-registered with radiation plans. When we use this SBRT protocol, the dose constraints to both lungs are the anatomical lung volume receiving at least 26 Gy (V26 Gy) < 10% and the mean dose (Dmean) < 7 Gy [10]. However, these dose constraints have been evaluated in patients with FEV1 > 0.7 L and should be lower in patients with FEV1 < 0.7 L. In our case, the V26Gy (yellow line) to the anatomic lung volume was 4.7% versus only 1.1% to the functional lung volume. Furthermore, the Dmean to the anatomical lung volume was 5.29 Gy versus only 2.68 Gy to the functional lung volume. Based on this functional evaluation with functional lung volumes irradiated significantly below the limit values and in the absence of a therapeutic alternative, we approved the SBRT treatment. At 3 months of treatment, the CT scan showed a partial response to radiotherapy 15 vs. 29 mm (−49%) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) (Figure 3) [12]. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, with three questionnaires about quality of life (QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, and EQ-5D-5L) and with pulmonary function test. The patient experienced no side effects, and spirometry showed a FEV1 of 0.27 L (13%). Lung SBRT is the standard of care to treat inoperable stage 1 and 2 lung cancer [1]. However, the reported incidence of symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury (grade ≥ 2) in the published data ranges from 9% to 28% [1] and is the most frequent adverse event after lung SBRT. Moreover, most retrospective studies and ongoing clinical trials of SBRT for lung cancer have only included patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) > 0.7 L [6,8]. Therefore, for a patient with a FEV1 < 0.7 L, the therapeutic index is unknown. Patients with severe COPD frequently demonstrate high heterogeneity of regional lung function, with non-functional areas alternating with still functional regions, which should be preserved as much as possible. Lung perfusion PET/CT imaging is a novel imaging technique for regional lung function evaluation. Similar to conventional lung perfusion scintigraphy, images are obtained after intravenous administration of macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) particles, which embolize in the pulmonary capillaries according to pulmonary blood flow. However, as compared with lung scintigraphy, these molecules are not radiolabeled with Technetium-99m, but with Gallium-68, a ß+ isotope, allowing image acquisition with PET technology [13]. PET is an intrinsically superior technique for image acquisition, with greater sensitivity and better spatial and temporal resolutions [14,15]. This offers the opportunity to improve the accuracy of lung functional volumes delineation and its integration in thoracic radiation therapy planning. Indeed, unlike surgery, radiation therapy requires a more accurate assessment of the distribution of lung function because radiation doses can be given to both lungs, not just the tumor-affected lobe. Siva et al. demonstrated the feasibility of preserving lung functional volumes in a cohort of 14 patients treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy for NSCLC adapted to 68Ga-perfusion PET/CT [16]. However, SBRT is a more precise and conformal technique that allows the irradiation of smaller volumes of organs at risk (OARs) [17]. To date, no study has evaluated the performance of 68Ga-perfusion PET/CT imaging to personalize lung SBRT planning and dosimetry. In our case, the performance of lung perfusion PET/CT allowed a more accurate assessment of the doses delivered to the functional lung volume at the time of radiotherapy planning than lung perfusion scintigraphy. These data allowed us to improve the prediction of the risk of toxicity in this patient and to evaluate it as very low. This case report illustrates the potential use of a Gallium-68 perfusion PET/CT in order to safely select patients with very severe COPD who can benefit from SBRT.
Diagnostics 13 00718 g001
Figure 2. Axial (left), coronal (middle), and sagittal (right) slices of registration between lung perfusion PET/CT using Gallium-68-MAA (in red: the most functional areas; in blue: the least functional areas) and treatment planning computed tomography simulation scan. The planning target volume (PTV) is contoured in red; the V26Gy is the yellow line.
Figure 2. Axial (left), coronal (middle), and sagittal (right) slices of registration between lung perfusion PET/CT using Gallium-68-MAA (in red: the most functional areas; in blue: the least functional areas) and treatment planning computed tomography simulation scan. The planning target volume (PTV) is contoured in red; the V26Gy is the yellow line.
Diagnostics 13 00718 g002
Figure 3. Computed tomography scan at 5 months of lung stereotactic radiotherapy.
Figure 3. Computed tomography scan at 5 months of lung stereotactic radiotherapy.
Diagnostics 13 00718 g003

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: F.L. and P.-Y.L.R.; methodology: F.L. and P.-Y.L.R.; software: D.B.; investigation: F.L., P.-Y.L.R., M.H. and F.P.; data curation: F.L., M.H. and F.P.; writing—original draft preparation: F.L., M.H. and P.-Y.L.R.; writing—review and editing: F.L., M.H., F.P. and P.-Y.L.R.; supervision: P.-Y.L.R.; project administration: F.L. and P.-Y.L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Nord Ouest IV Ethics Committee (ID RCB: 2021-002224-20) and registered in ClinicalTrial.gov registry (NCT04942275).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Research data are stored in an institutional repository and will be shared upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saha, A.; Beasley, M.; Hatton, N.; Dickinson, P.; Franks, K.; Clarke, K.; Jain, P.; Teo, M.; Murray, P.; Lilley, J. Clinical and dosimetric predictors of radiation pneumonitis in early-stage lung cancer treated with Stereotactic Ablative radiotherapy (SABR)—An analysis of UK’s largest cohort of lung SABR patients. Radiother. Oncol. 2021, 156, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barriger, R.B.; Forquer, J.A.; Brabham, J.G.; Andolino, D.L.; Shapiro, R.H.; Henderson, M.A.; Johnstone, P.A.; Fakiris, A.J. A dose-volume analysis of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 82, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bongers, E.M.; Botticella, A.; Palma, D.A.; Haasbeek, C.J.; Warner, A.; Verbakel, W.F.; Slotman, B.; Ricardi, U.; Senan, S. Predictive parameters of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis following stereotactic or hypofractionated radiotherapy delivered using volumetric modulated arcs. Radiother. Oncol. 2013, 109, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Matsuo, Y.; Shibuya, K.; Nakamura, M.; Narabayashi, M.; Sakanaka, K.; Ueki, N.; Miyagi, K.; Norihisa, Y.; Mizowaki, T.; Nagata, Y.; et al. Dose--volume metrics associated with radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 83, e545–e549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nakamura, M.; Nishimura, H.; Nakayama, M.; Mayahara, H.; Uezono, H.; Harada, A.; Hashimoto, N.; Ejima, Y.; Ishihara, T.; Sasaki, R. Dosimetric factors predicting radiation pneumonitis after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripheral lung cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 2016, 89, 20160560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kimura, T.; Nagata, Y.; Eba, J.; Ozawa, S.; Ishikura, S.; Shibata, T.; Ito, Y.; Hiraoka, M.; Nishimura, Y. Radiation Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology G: A randomized Phase III trial of comparing two dose-fractionations stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer or small lung lesions clinically diagnosed as primary lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1408 (J-SBRT trial). Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 47, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Nagata, Y.; Hiraoka, M.; Shibata, T.; Onishi, H.; Kokubo, M.; Karasawa, K.; Shioyama, Y.; Onimaru, R.; Kozuka, T.; Kunieda, E.; et al. Prospective Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Both Operable and Inoperable T1N0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0403. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015, 93, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Palma, D.; Lagerwaard, F.; Rodrigues, G.; Haasbeek, C.; Senan, S. Curative treatment of Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with severe COPD: Stereotactic radiotherapy outcomes and systematic review. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 82, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abe, T.; Ryuno, Y.; Saito, S.; Aoshika, T.; Igari, M.; Hirai, R.; Kumazaki, Y.; Kaira, K.; Kagamu, H.; Ishida, H.; et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife for T1N0M0 lung cancer patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction. J. Radiat. Res. 2020, 61, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhao, Y.; Khawandanh, E.; Thomas, S.; Zhang, S.; Dunne, E.M.; Liu, M.; Schellenberg, D. Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 15, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Le Roux, P.Y.; Siva, S.; Callahan, J.; Claudic, Y.; Bourhis, D.; Steinfort, D.P.; Hicks, R.J.; Hofman, M.S. Automatic delineation of functional lung volumes with 68Ga-ventilation/perfusion PET/CT. EJNMMI Res. 2017, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schwartz, L.H.; Litiere, S.; de Vries, E.; Ford, R.; Gwyther, S.; Mandrekar, S.; Shankar, L.; Bogaerts, J.; Chen, A.; Dancey, J.; et al. RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. Eur. J. Cancer 2016, 62, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Blanc-Beguin, F.; Hennebicq, S.; Robin, P.; Tripier, R.; Salaun, P.Y.; Le Roux, P.Y. Radiopharmaceutical Labelling for Lung Ventilation/Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Review of Production and Optimization Processes for Clinical Use. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Le Roux, P.Y.; Hicks, R.J.; Siva, S.; Hofman, M.S. PET/CT Lung Ventilation and Perfusion Scanning using Galligas and Gallium-68-MAA. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 49, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hicks, R.J.; Hofman, M.S. Is there still a role for SPECT-CT in oncology in the PET-CT era? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 9, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Siva, S.; Devereux, T.; Ball, D.L.; MacManus, M.P.; Hardcastle, N.; Kron, T.; Bressel, M.; Foroudi, F.; Plumridge, N.; Steinfort, D.; et al. Ga-68 MAA Perfusion 4D-PET/CT Scanning Allows for Functional Lung Avoidance Using Conformal Radiation Therapy Planning. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 15, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ball, D.; Mai, G.T.; Vinod, S.; Babington, S.; Ruben, J.; Kron, T.; Chesson, B.; Herschtal, A.; Vanevski, M.; Rezo, A.; et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer (TROG 09.02 CHISEL): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lucia, F.; Hamya, M.; Pinot, F.; Bourhis, D.; Le Roux, P.-Y. Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient with Severe Lung Function Impairment Allowed by Gallium-68 Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Case Report. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040718

AMA Style

Lucia F, Hamya M, Pinot F, Bourhis D, Le Roux P-Y. Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient with Severe Lung Function Impairment Allowed by Gallium-68 Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Case Report. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(4):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lucia, François, Mohamed Hamya, Fanny Pinot, David Bourhis, and Pierre-Yves Le Roux. 2023. "Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient with Severe Lung Function Impairment Allowed by Gallium-68 Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Case Report" Diagnostics 13, no. 4: 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040718

APA Style

Lucia, F., Hamya, M., Pinot, F., Bourhis, D., & Le Roux, P.-Y. (2023). Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient with Severe Lung Function Impairment Allowed by Gallium-68 Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Case Report. Diagnostics, 13(4), 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop