Next Article in Journal
Qualitative and Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Platelet Abnormalities in Children with Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza
Previous Article in Journal
Post-COVID Endocrine Disorders: Putative Role of Molecular Mimicry and Some Pathomorphological Correlates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formalin Inactivation of Virus for Safe Downstream Processing of Routine Stool Parasite Examination during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of InTray Cassettes Directly from Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Clinical Bacteriology Laboratories as an Alternative to Classic Culture Media

Diagnostics 2023, 13(3), 523; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030523
by Alessandra Natale 1,*, Saoussen Oueslati 2,3, Alice Rochard 1, Sien Ombelet 4, Daniel Lopez-Baez 5, Liselotte Hardy 4, Jane Cunningham 6, Céline Franquesa 1, Olivier Vandenberg 7,8,9,† on behalf of the Mini-Lab Scientific Committee, Jean-Baptiste Ronat 1,2,3 and Thierry Naas 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2023, 13(3), 523; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030523
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 14 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases and Microorganisms)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

   This is an interesting article on Evaluation of In Tray cassettes directly from blood cultures for 2 the diagnosis of sepsis in clinical bacteriology laboratories as 3 an alternative to classic culture media with accepts for publication.

Comments

1-      The English used correct and readable.

2-      The work had a significant contribution to the field.

 

3-      The work was well organized and comprehensively described.

 4-      There were appropriate and adequate references to related and previous work.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you!

Back to TopTop