Next Article in Journal
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of the Thymus in Children with Non-Thymic Neoplasms
Next Article in Special Issue
Antenatal Determinants of Postnatal Renal Function in Fetal Megacystis: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Prophylactic Medication during Radioembolization in Metastatic Liver Disease: Is It Really Necessary? A Retrospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of NAG, NGAL, and KIM-1 as Prognostic Markers of the Initial Evolution of Kidney Transplantation
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Identification of Messenger RNA Signatures in Age-Dependent Renal Impairment

Diagnostics 2023, 13(24), 3653; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13243653
by Katsunori Yanai 1,*, Shohei Kaneko 1, Akinori Aomatsu 1,2, Keiji Hirai 1, Susumu Ookawara 1 and Yoshiyuki Morishita 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(24), 3653; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13243653
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 30 November 2023 / Published: 13 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kidney Disease: Biomarkers, Diagnosis, and Prognosis: 2nd Edition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors, 

I have some comments about your paper:

-improve introduction

-explicit aim of the study  in the paper

-specify how many animal did you use? I suppose one animal for type: so your data have to be validated and confirmed

-add limits of the study

-why did you use ANOVA and parametric tests? did you test data?

the work is very interesting but the data have be to validate. Conclusions are hypothesis-genereting data and are to confirmed

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English is ok

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper is meticulously structured and logically organized. It effectively integrates pertinent and recent studies within the References section. Ethical guidelines were diligently followed, ensuring the proper treatment of the animals involved. The discussion section aptly identifies and deliberates upon the study's limitations. Despite certain ambiguities and the necessity for further investigation, this paper serves as a promising foundation for future research endeavors.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This version is ok for publication

Back to TopTop