Next Article in Journal
Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Autism Parenting Stress Index (APSI) among Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Proximal Caries Detection Using Short-Wave Infrared Transillumination at Wavelengths of 1050, 1200 and 1300 nm in Permanent Posterior Human Teeth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative NLR, MLR, and PLR Values in Predicting the Outcome of Primary Cytoreductive Surgery in Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
 
 
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

Prognostic Significance of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics 2023, 13(20), 3258; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203258
by Jeongwan Kang, Kang Min Han, Hera Jung and Hyunchul Kim *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(20), 3258; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203258
Submission received: 25 September 2023 / Revised: 9 October 2023 / Accepted: 18 October 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Gynecological Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

 

The article is interesting. Ovarian cancer still represents a challenging diagnosis and overall management nowadays, still associating a poor prognosis. Thus new markers of prognostics are very useful. The meta-analysis is well designed and well presented, the style is impeccable and the research adds value to our current knowledge. I only have a few minor comments.

Here are my observations:

1.       Title – no need for point at the end of the title.

2.       Abstract - no need for numbers with concern to each section since these sections are standard.

3.       Abstract. Please provide a few core data (numbers, statistics) based on your research starting for the published data.

4.       Introduction. Please specify the current role of PD-L1 assessments in other cancers (the most practical aspects nowadays).

5.       Table 1. Reference number should be included within the first column.

6.       Table 1. Is the display is based on the data of publication or another criteria has been used?

7.       Results. Please use “p” (not capital letter) for p-value.

8.       Conclusion. Please avoid “In summary” after announcing “5.Conclusions”

Thank you

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

===================================================

Reviewer 2 Report

Although PD-L1 expression has been discussing intensively related to different type of tumours recently, the potential benefit of this biomarker e aluatiom in high grade serous carcinoma has yet to be established. This systematic review and meta- analysis is comprehensive and well organised, including many available investigations, either whole section evaluation or TMA. At the same time a conclusion is not so impactful because the relationship between positive PD-L1 expression and good prognosis is not surprising. It would be more interesting to discuss PD-L1 expression and HGSC immunoreactive molecular subtype, because molecular subtyping is a futures step for patients subdividing, and more personalised therapy. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop