Next Article in Journal
Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Predicting the Probability of the Incidence of Maxillary Sinus Fungus Ball in Patients Using Nomogram Models
Previous Article in Journal
Ultra-High-Resolution Electrocardiography Enables Earlier Detection of Transmural and Subendocardial Myocardial Ischemia Compared to Conventional Electrocardiography
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Developmental Midline Nasal Masses: Histopathological, Clinical, and Radiological Aspects

Diagnostics 2023, 13(17), 2796; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172796
by Michal Kotowski
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(17), 2796; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172796
Submission received: 20 July 2023 / Revised: 24 August 2023 / Accepted: 26 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This narrative review on congenital middle line nasal masses is interesting. To my opinion only minor english language correction is required. I think that the addition of a table summarizing their statements would be of use

no further comments

Author Response

General information: I would like to thank the Reviewer for the revision.

 

Reviewer’s comment: This narrative review on congenital middle line nasal masses is interesting. To my opinion only minor english language correction is required.

Reply: I appreciate your assessment of the manuscript. The manuscript was checked by the native speaker and some language corrections have been made.

 

Reviewer’s comment: I think that the addition of a table summarizing their statements would be of use.

Reply and action: Thank you for this valuable comment. The table has been added.

Reviewer 2 Report

In his review, the author tried to underline the clinical, histopathological and radiological aspects of nasal dermoid, congenital encephalocele and nasal glial heterotopias and what should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

The article as a whole is very nicely arranged, well written and very well organized. I can contribute to the article at this point. I think it would be better if the author enriches the article by presenting examples of his own cases with radiological and endoscopic images of nasal dermoid, congenital encephalocele and nasal glial heterotopias.

Kind regards

Author Response

General information: I would like to thank the Reviewer for the revision.

 

Reviewer’s comment: The article as a whole is very nicely arranged, well written and very well organized. I can contribute to the article at this point.

Reply: I appreciate your assessment of the manuscript.

 

Reviewer’s comment: I think it would be better if the author enriches the article by presenting examples of his own cases with radiological and endoscopic images of nasal dermoid, congenital encephalocele and nasal glial heterotopias.

Reply and action: Thank you for this comment. I have added the images representing discussed pathologies to the manuscript.

 

Back to TopTop