Next Article in Journal
General Roadmap and Core Steps for the Development of AI Tools in Digital Pathology
Previous Article in Journal
Faster Time to Treatment Decision of Viscoelastic Coagulation Test Results through Improved Perception with the Animated Visual Clot: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Diagnostic Age, Age at Death and Stage Migration in Men Dying with or from Prostate Cancer in Denmark

Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051271
by Marc Casper Meineche Andersen 1,*, Hein Vincent Stroomberg 1, Klaus Brasso 1,2, John Thomas Helgstrand 1 and Andreas Røder 1,2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051271
Submission received: 6 May 2022 / Revised: 17 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for asking me to review the manuscript.

Herewith I am giving my comments. Hope these comments will be helpful for the authors.

Major Essential Revisions

・I can't find the results of survival in abstract. If your focus is age at death, the title was not appropriate.

Did you show data of life-expectancy in your results?

 

・Please show the characteristics of the men.

I recommend that you make the table of the characteristics of the men.

 

・The results section (lines 90-92 ) is different in a number of Figure2.

 

・What do you show in “No” of Figure 3B and Figure 3D?  

Please add annotation to the Figure 3B and Figure 3D.

 

・A numerical formula of Linear regression models is not clear.

Please show a numerical formula of Linear regression models.

 

Minor Essential Revisions

It is better to align the number of digits after the decimal point.

For example, p=0.24 (line140), p=0.1 (line142), p=0.002 (line144)

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

No suggestions

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the time spend on reviewing the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

No suggestions

Back to TopTop