Next Article in Journal
The Role of Adjuvant Single Postoperative Instillation of Gemcitabine for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Large Pericardial Effusion—Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options, with a Special Attention to the Role of Prolonged Pericardial Fluid Drainage
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Classification of Breast Cancer Lesions in Histopathological Images Using DEEP_Pachi: Multiple Self-Attention Head
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pelvic Pain in Reproductive Age: US Findings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Point-of-Care Ultrasonography as an Extension of the Physical Examination for Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: The Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Volvulus as a Rare Complication after Changing the Feeding Jejunostomy Tube

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
2
College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
4
Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City 236, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1153; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051153
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022

Abstract

:
Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has become the most popular modality of testing for physicians in recent years and is used for improving the quality of care and increasing patient safety. However, POCUS is not always acceptable to all physicians. To address the benefits and importance of POCUS, numerous studies have examined the use of POCUS in clinical practice and even medical education. This article aims to highlight the effects of POCUS as an extension of the physical examination, and we present a case to address the reasons it should be performed. For a man experiencing abdominal pain immediately after his feeding jejunostomy tube was changed, there was high suspicion of small-bowel volvulus after a “whirlpool sign” was observed during the POCUS, whereby mesenteric vessels presented in a whirling or spiral shape. This impression was subsequently confirmed by computed tomography. Small-bowel volvulus is a rare complication of changing a feeding jejunostomy tube. The images submitted here add to the sparse evidence from the literature on the use of POCUS as an extension of the physical examination for evaluating abdominal pain. POCUS can be used after taking the patient’s history and conducting a physical examination. The observation of a whirlpool sign may indicate the presence of a volvulus that is life-threatening.

Graphical Abstract

Figure 1. Point-of-care ultrasonography image demonstrating the “whirlpool sign” (arrows) over the mesenteric vessels as indicated by their presentation in a spiral shape. Abdominal pain is the most common complaint in the emergency department (ED) [1,2]. Acute abdominal pain can be caused by a spectrum of conditions ranging from benign and self-limited diseases to surgical emergencies. Abdominal pain is caused by a variety of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal disorders. Some frequently missed conditions include biliary pathology, appendicitis [3], diverticulitis, urogenital pathology, and even vascular emergency [1]. Therefore, the rapid and early detection of urgent conditions is crucial for managing patients efficiently. The combination of clinical and laboratory evaluation cannot reliably predict or exclude urgent conditions and can result in unnecessary or delayed interventions. Further diagnostic imaging such as point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) can help in the early identification of the cause of abdominal pain [4,5] and increase the certainty of the diagnosis [6]. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) defines clinical ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality that provides clinically significant data that are not obtainable by inspection, palpation, auscultation, or other components of the physical examination [7]. POCUS performed and interpreted by physicians at the bedside has grown rapidly in recent decades [8], as current ultrasound equipment has become less expensive, higher quality and more compact. The use of bedside ultrasonography (or insonation), incorporated with traditional inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation have become the five pillars of bedside clinical medicine [9]. As an extension of the physical examination [10], a more generalized concept of an “ultrasound stethoscope” is used to provide directed clinical assessments [11,12]. It could provide immediate, real-time dynamic images that are correlated with a patient’s clinical condition and are easily repeatable. The main goal of POCUS in ED is to rapidly rule in or rule out a dangerous diagnosis and to solve clinical problems, such as evaluating the cause of shock [13]; shortness of breath [14]; chest pain; fever; and muscular, skeleton, or soft tissue swelling and pain [15,16] before laboratory tests. It can also help to guide the procedure [17,18] and allow checking for complications to promote patient safety [19]. Moreover, it can be used as a first-line tool for the evaluation of abdominal pain after taking the patient’s history and conducting a physical examination [4,5,20,21]. The use of ultrasonography can enable the detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain and can decrease unnecessary radiation exposure [6], decrease the need for further examinations, and decrease the frequency with which patients are admitted [22]. Nevertheless, ultrasonography is an extremely operator-dependent modality of testing. Acquiring the skills to properly manipulate and interpret images for safe integration with clinical work takes years to master [20,23]. There are many factors that can affect the quality of POCUS and the decision making involved, such as patient factors, the operator’s skills in image acquisition and interpretation, and machine quality [11]. It is important to be able to identify and differentiate artifacts and false positives and negatives to overcome the pitfalls of POCUS [24,25]. Therefore, POCUS education has been integrated into postgraduate-year training, and emergency resident training is important. It will result in physicians having more self-confidence to overcome the barriers for implementing POCUS in clinical practice. Here, we present an unusual case of abdominal pain after jejunostomy tube insertion with the use of POCUS for diagnosis. A 51-year-old male with a history of esophageal cancer presented to the emergency department due to a jejunostomy tube that had been accidentally dislodged without causing abdominal pain and hemodynamically stable. A few minutes after the introduction of a new tube, the patient complained of diffuse abdominal pain. Upon examination, his body temperature was 36.6 °C, his pulse rate was 79 beats per minute, his blood pressure was 90/45 mmHg, and his respiratory rate was 18 breaths per minute. The physical examination revealed a soft abdomen without rebounding tenderness or muscle guarding. The jejunostomy tube functioned well, and laboratory tests were unremarkable. The source of abdominal pain was considered benign. However, analgesic agents could not relieve abdominal pain. We performed POCUS for persistent abdominal pain to rule out bowel perforation or other dangerous etiology such as vascular emergencies, and it demonstrated mesenteric vessels presenting in a whirlpool sign, namely, in a whirling or spiral shape (Figure 1, Video S1). We tried to remove the tube; however, it could not be moved and induced progressive pain. It prompted the use of computed tomography (CT) (Figure 2, Video S2). This confirmed the presence of a small-bowel volvulus with a whirlpool sign over the jejunal branches of the superior mesenteric vessels. A surgeon was consulted, and this patient underwent surgical correction of the volvulus, without subsequent complications.
Figure 1. Point-of-care ultrasonography image demonstrating the “whirlpool sign” (arrows) over the mesenteric vessels as indicated by their presentation in a spiral shape. Abdominal pain is the most common complaint in the emergency department (ED) [1,2]. Acute abdominal pain can be caused by a spectrum of conditions ranging from benign and self-limited diseases to surgical emergencies. Abdominal pain is caused by a variety of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal disorders. Some frequently missed conditions include biliary pathology, appendicitis [3], diverticulitis, urogenital pathology, and even vascular emergency [1]. Therefore, the rapid and early detection of urgent conditions is crucial for managing patients efficiently. The combination of clinical and laboratory evaluation cannot reliably predict or exclude urgent conditions and can result in unnecessary or delayed interventions. Further diagnostic imaging such as point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) can help in the early identification of the cause of abdominal pain [4,5] and increase the certainty of the diagnosis [6]. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) defines clinical ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality that provides clinically significant data that are not obtainable by inspection, palpation, auscultation, or other components of the physical examination [7]. POCUS performed and interpreted by physicians at the bedside has grown rapidly in recent decades [8], as current ultrasound equipment has become less expensive, higher quality and more compact. The use of bedside ultrasonography (or insonation), incorporated with traditional inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation have become the five pillars of bedside clinical medicine [9]. As an extension of the physical examination [10], a more generalized concept of an “ultrasound stethoscope” is used to provide directed clinical assessments [11,12]. It could provide immediate, real-time dynamic images that are correlated with a patient’s clinical condition and are easily repeatable. The main goal of POCUS in ED is to rapidly rule in or rule out a dangerous diagnosis and to solve clinical problems, such as evaluating the cause of shock [13]; shortness of breath [14]; chest pain; fever; and muscular, skeleton, or soft tissue swelling and pain [15,16] before laboratory tests. It can also help to guide the procedure [17,18] and allow checking for complications to promote patient safety [19]. Moreover, it can be used as a first-line tool for the evaluation of abdominal pain after taking the patient’s history and conducting a physical examination [4,5,20,21]. The use of ultrasonography can enable the detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain and can decrease unnecessary radiation exposure [6], decrease the need for further examinations, and decrease the frequency with which patients are admitted [22]. Nevertheless, ultrasonography is an extremely operator-dependent modality of testing. Acquiring the skills to properly manipulate and interpret images for safe integration with clinical work takes years to master [20,23]. There are many factors that can affect the quality of POCUS and the decision making involved, such as patient factors, the operator’s skills in image acquisition and interpretation, and machine quality [11]. It is important to be able to identify and differentiate artifacts and false positives and negatives to overcome the pitfalls of POCUS [24,25]. Therefore, POCUS education has been integrated into postgraduate-year training, and emergency resident training is important. It will result in physicians having more self-confidence to overcome the barriers for implementing POCUS in clinical practice. Here, we present an unusual case of abdominal pain after jejunostomy tube insertion with the use of POCUS for diagnosis. A 51-year-old male with a history of esophageal cancer presented to the emergency department due to a jejunostomy tube that had been accidentally dislodged without causing abdominal pain and hemodynamically stable. A few minutes after the introduction of a new tube, the patient complained of diffuse abdominal pain. Upon examination, his body temperature was 36.6 °C, his pulse rate was 79 beats per minute, his blood pressure was 90/45 mmHg, and his respiratory rate was 18 breaths per minute. The physical examination revealed a soft abdomen without rebounding tenderness or muscle guarding. The jejunostomy tube functioned well, and laboratory tests were unremarkable. The source of abdominal pain was considered benign. However, analgesic agents could not relieve abdominal pain. We performed POCUS for persistent abdominal pain to rule out bowel perforation or other dangerous etiology such as vascular emergencies, and it demonstrated mesenteric vessels presenting in a whirlpool sign, namely, in a whirling or spiral shape (Figure 1, Video S1). We tried to remove the tube; however, it could not be moved and induced progressive pain. It prompted the use of computed tomography (CT) (Figure 2, Video S2). This confirmed the presence of a small-bowel volvulus with a whirlpool sign over the jejunal branches of the superior mesenteric vessels. A surgeon was consulted, and this patient underwent surgical correction of the volvulus, without subsequent complications.
Diagnostics 12 01153 g001
Figure 2. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrating the “whirlpool sign” over the jejunal branches of the superior mesenteric vessels (asterixis) with the feeding jejunostomy tube in place (arrows). In fact, if we conducted POCUS immediately after the physical examination, as an extension of the physical examination, we could obtain the final diagnosis faster without waiting for laboratory tests and symptom relief. This is where the real usefulness of POCUS lies—in speeding up diagnosis and management. Owing to how crowded and busy the emergency department is, many physicians order laboratory studies just after taking patient history and conducting physical examinations without POCUS. If the patient does not have a peritoneal sign and laboratory tests are not abnormal, physicians will screen for abdominal pain. If any of the above changes or abdominal pain persists or worsens, the physicians will arrange an abdominal CT for further confirmation. Abdominal CT has been shown to reduce early return visits [26]. However, if a patient suffers from a vascular emergency such as superior mesenteric artery dissection [27] or abdominal aortic aneurysm [28], “waiting for the laboratory tests” will result in a disaster, due to interventions being delayed. Moreover, abdominal pain is the leading presenting symptom, which accounts for 31% of the symptoms among patients who spend >4 h in the ED [29]. If we perform POCUS immediately after taking the patient’s history and conducting a physical examination, we will obtain the impression earlier, and it will help us to obtain the correct disposition faster. Moreover, it will help to create more order in the emergency department. It may help to relieve overcrowding in the ED and decrease inpatient mortality, the length of stay, and the costs for the admitted patients [30]. However, there is still no direct evidence for this. In the literature, there is only evidence that POCUS could reduce the disposition time in patients with dyspnea [31] and deep vein thrombosis [32]. Feeding jejunostomy is a common surgical procedure for enteral nutrition. However, complications that require re-exploration and that can be life-threatening may develop. Common complications include tube dislocation, abdominal wall or intra-abdominal infection, gastrointestinal symptoms, bowel necrosis, pneumatosis intestinalis [33], fluid and electrolyte imbalances [34], enteral migration [35], and intussusception [36]. Small-bowel volvulus, which refers to the torsion of the alimentary tract, is a rare complication of changing the jejunostomy tube [33,37]. A patient with volvulus may present with abdominal pain, abdominal distension, constipation, nausea, or vomiting. The characteristics of whirlpool signs (mesenteric vessels that have a whirling or spiral shape) can be detected via POCUS [38] or CT. Although abdominal CT is considered the optimal tool for diagnosis [39], POCUS can detect specific and dynamic signs of small-bowel volvulus [38] with no radiation, contrast exposure, lesser expenses, and higher availability. Patients who present with small-bowel volvulus should obtain immediate surgical consultations. If left untreated, it may eventually lead to catastrophic bowel ischemia, necrosis, and perforation [40]. Our case illustrates that abdominal pain immediately after jejunostomy tube insertion is a sign of life-threatening iatrogenic small-bowel volvulus with a characteristic “whirlpool sign”, which may be detected by POCUS. The pain may be mimicked by benign colic or traction pain caused by the tube. If we performed POCUS as an extension of the physical examination, we would obtain the final diagnosis faster. In addition to the utilization of POCUS in ED patients with abdominal pain, this review identified whether POCUS could reduce the disposition time, length of stay in the ED, and number of return visits for patients with abdominal pain in the ED, as an area for potential policy research and future exploration.
Figure 2. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrating the “whirlpool sign” over the jejunal branches of the superior mesenteric vessels (asterixis) with the feeding jejunostomy tube in place (arrows). In fact, if we conducted POCUS immediately after the physical examination, as an extension of the physical examination, we could obtain the final diagnosis faster without waiting for laboratory tests and symptom relief. This is where the real usefulness of POCUS lies—in speeding up diagnosis and management. Owing to how crowded and busy the emergency department is, many physicians order laboratory studies just after taking patient history and conducting physical examinations without POCUS. If the patient does not have a peritoneal sign and laboratory tests are not abnormal, physicians will screen for abdominal pain. If any of the above changes or abdominal pain persists or worsens, the physicians will arrange an abdominal CT for further confirmation. Abdominal CT has been shown to reduce early return visits [26]. However, if a patient suffers from a vascular emergency such as superior mesenteric artery dissection [27] or abdominal aortic aneurysm [28], “waiting for the laboratory tests” will result in a disaster, due to interventions being delayed. Moreover, abdominal pain is the leading presenting symptom, which accounts for 31% of the symptoms among patients who spend >4 h in the ED [29]. If we perform POCUS immediately after taking the patient’s history and conducting a physical examination, we will obtain the impression earlier, and it will help us to obtain the correct disposition faster. Moreover, it will help to create more order in the emergency department. It may help to relieve overcrowding in the ED and decrease inpatient mortality, the length of stay, and the costs for the admitted patients [30]. However, there is still no direct evidence for this. In the literature, there is only evidence that POCUS could reduce the disposition time in patients with dyspnea [31] and deep vein thrombosis [32]. Feeding jejunostomy is a common surgical procedure for enteral nutrition. However, complications that require re-exploration and that can be life-threatening may develop. Common complications include tube dislocation, abdominal wall or intra-abdominal infection, gastrointestinal symptoms, bowel necrosis, pneumatosis intestinalis [33], fluid and electrolyte imbalances [34], enteral migration [35], and intussusception [36]. Small-bowel volvulus, which refers to the torsion of the alimentary tract, is a rare complication of changing the jejunostomy tube [33,37]. A patient with volvulus may present with abdominal pain, abdominal distension, constipation, nausea, or vomiting. The characteristics of whirlpool signs (mesenteric vessels that have a whirling or spiral shape) can be detected via POCUS [38] or CT. Although abdominal CT is considered the optimal tool for diagnosis [39], POCUS can detect specific and dynamic signs of small-bowel volvulus [38] with no radiation, contrast exposure, lesser expenses, and higher availability. Patients who present with small-bowel volvulus should obtain immediate surgical consultations. If left untreated, it may eventually lead to catastrophic bowel ischemia, necrosis, and perforation [40]. Our case illustrates that abdominal pain immediately after jejunostomy tube insertion is a sign of life-threatening iatrogenic small-bowel volvulus with a characteristic “whirlpool sign”, which may be detected by POCUS. The pain may be mimicked by benign colic or traction pain caused by the tube. If we performed POCUS as an extension of the physical examination, we would obtain the final diagnosis faster. In addition to the utilization of POCUS in ED patients with abdominal pain, this review identified whether POCUS could reduce the disposition time, length of stay in the ED, and number of return visits for patients with abdominal pain in the ED, as an area for potential policy research and future exploration.
Diagnostics 12 01153 g002

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics12051153/s1: “Whirlpool sign” (arrows) over the mesenteric vessels is indicated by the spiral shape of the mesenteric vessels as demonstrated by ultrasonography (Video S1). “Whirlpool sign” (arrows) over the mesenteric vessels is indicated by the spiral shape of the mesenteric vessels as demonstrated by computed tomography (Video S2).

Author Contributions

T.-C.W., R.-C.T. and S.-H.W. were involved in drafting the manuscript and reviewing the images. J.-X.L., T.-H.C., W.-J.L. and T.-F.C. were involved in reviewing, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to no additional intervention apart from routine clinical treatment being conducted.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this review. Data sharing is not applicable for this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Halsey-Nichols, M.; McCoin, N. Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: Missed Diagnoses. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 39, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cinar, O.; Jay, L.; Fosnocht, D.; Carey, J.; Rogers, L.; Carey, A.; Horne, B.; Madsen, T. Longitudinal trends in the treatment of abdominal pain in an academic emergency department. J. Emerg. Med. 2013, 45, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mahajan, P.; Basu, T.; Pai, C.W.; Singh, H.; Petersen, N.; Bellolio, M.F.; Gadepalli, S.K.; Kamdar, N.S. Factors Associated With Potentially Missed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in the Emergency Department. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e200612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hata, J. Point-of-care ultrasound for acute abdomen: 5W1H (Translated version). J. Med. Ultrason. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Al Ali, M.; Jabbour, S.; Alrajaby, S. ACUTE ABDOMEN systemic sonographic approach to acute abdomen in emergency department: A case series. Ultrasound J. 2019, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bassler, D.; Snoey, E.R.; Kim, J. Goal-directed abdominal ultrasonography: Impact on real-time decision making in the emergency department. J. Emerg. Med. 2003, 24, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. American College of Emergency Physicians. ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines-2001. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2001, 38, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Díaz-Gómez, J.L.; Mayo, P.H.; Koenig, S.J. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1593–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Narula, J.; Chandrashekhar, Y.; Braunwald, E. Time to Add a Fifth Pillar to Bedside Physical Examination: Inspection, Palpation, Percussion, Auscultation, and Insonation. JAMA Cardiol. 2018, 3, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, Y.J.; Jung, J.Y.; Kwon, H. Effectiveness of education in point-of-care ultrasound-assisted physical examinations in an emergency department: A before-and-after study. Medicine 2017, 96, e7269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abu-Zidan, F.M. Point-of-care ultrasound in critically ill patients: Where do we stand? J. Emerg. Trauma Shock 2012, 5, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alpert, J.S.; Mladenovic, J.; Hellmann, D.B. Should a hand-carried ultrasound machine become standard equipment for every internist? Am. J. Med. 2009, 122, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Perera, P.; Mailhot, T.; Riley, D.; Mandavia, D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 28, 29–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kameda, T.; Kimura, A. Basic point-of-care ultrasound framework based on the airway, breathing, and circulation approach for the initial management of shock and dyspnea. Acute Med. Surg. 2020, 7, e481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wu, J.; Ge, L.; Wang, X.; Jin, Y. Role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the diagnosis of an abscess in paediatric skin and soft tissue infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. Ultrason. 2021; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, K.C.; Lin, A.C.; Chong, C.F.; Wang, T.L. An overview of point-of-care ultrasound for soft tissue and musculoskeletal applications in the emergency department. J. Intensive Care 2016, 4, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Khandelwal, A.; Devine, L.A.; Otremba, M. Quality of Widely Available Video Instructional Materials for Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Procedure Training in Internal Medicine. J. Ultrasound Med. 2017, 36, 1445–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lahham, S.; Schmalbach, P.; Wilson, S.P.; Ludeman, L.; Subeh, M.; Chao, J.; Albadawi, N.; Mohammadi, N.; Fox, J.C. Prospective evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound for pre-procedure identification of landmarks versus traditional palpation for lumbar puncture. World J. Emerg. Med. 2016, 7, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Montrief, T.; Auerbach, J.; Cabrera, J.; Long, B. Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Confirm Central Venous Catheter Placement and Evaluate for Postprocedural Complications. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 60, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kjesbu, I.E.; Laursen, C.B.; Graven, T.; Holden, H.M.; Rømo, B.; Newton Andersen, G.; Mjølstad, O.C.; Lassen, A.; Dalen, H. Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Abdominal Sonography by Pocket-Sized Imaging Devices, Performed by Medical Residents. J. Ultrasound Med. 2017, 36, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cartwright, S.L.; Knudson, M.P. Evaluation of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am. Fam. Physician 2008, 77, 971–978. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oks, M.; Cleven, K.L.; Cardenas-Garcia, J.; Schaub, J.A.; Koenig, S.; Cohen, R.I.; Mayo, P.H.; Narasimhan, M. The effect of point-of-care ultrasonography on imaging studies in the medical ICU: A comparative study. Chest 2014, 146, 1574–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bahner, D.P.; Hughes, D.; Royall, N.A. I-AIM: A novel model for teaching and performing focused sonography. J. Ultrasound Med. 2012, 31, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Di Serafino, M.; Iacobellis, F.; Schillirò, M.L.; D’Auria, D.; Verde, F.; Grimaldi, D.; Dell’Aversano Orabona, G.; Caruso, M.; Sabatino, V.; Rinaldo, C.; et al. Common and Uncommon Errors in Emergency Ultrasound. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blanco, P.; Volpicelli, G. Common pitfalls in point-of-care ultrasound: A practical guide for emergency and critical care physicians. Crit. Ultrasound J. 2016, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Yau, F.F.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, C.Y.; Li, C.J.; Wang, S.H.; Chiu, I.M. Risk Factors for Early Return Visits to the Emergency Department in Patients Presenting with Nonspecific Abdominal Pain and the Use of Computed Tomography Scan. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huang, C.Y.; Sun, J.T.; Lien, W.C. Early Detection of Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection by Ultrasound: Two Case Reports. J. Med. Ultrasound 2019, 27, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Murray, M.; Costa, A.F. Appropriateness of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening With Ultrasound: Potential Cost Savings With Guideline Adherence and Review of Prior Imaging. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2021, 72, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dadeh, A.A.; Phunyanantakorn, P. Factors Affecting Length of Stay in the Emergency Department in Patients Who Presented with Abdominal Pain. Emerg. Med. Int. 2020, 2020, 5406516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, B.C.; Hsia, R.Y.; Weiss, R.E.; Zingmond, D.; Liang, L.J.; Han, W.; McCreath, H.; Asch, S.M. Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2013, 61, 605–611.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zare, M.A.; Bahmani, A.; Fathi, M.; Arefi, M.; Hossein Sarbazi, A.; Teimoori, M. Role of point-of-care ultrasound study in early disposition of patients with undifferentiated acute dyspnea in emergency department: A multi-center prospective study. J. Ultrasound, 2021; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seyedhosseini, J.; Fadavi, A.; Vahidi, E.; Saeedi, M.; Momeni, M. Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on disposition time of patients presenting with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, done by emergency physicians. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2018, 18, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Myers, J.G.; Page, C.P.; Stewart, R.M.; Schwesinger, W.H.; Sirinek, K.R.; Aust, J.B. Complications of needle catheter jejunostomy in 2022 consecutive applications. Am. J. Surg. 1995, 170, 547–550; discussion 550–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Choi, A.H.; O’Leary, M.P.; Merchant, S.J.; Sun, V.; Chao, J.; Raz, D.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J. Complications of Feeding Jejunostomy Tubes in Patients with Gastroesophageal Cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017, 21, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ozben, V.; Karataş, A.; Atasoy, D.; Sımşek, A.; Sarigül, R.; Tortum, O.B. A rare complication of jejunostomy tube: Enteral migration. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 22, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Dutta, S.; Gaur, N.K.; Reddy, A.; Jain, A.; Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah, V.P. Antegrade Jejunojejunal Intussusception: An Unusual Complication Following Feeding Jejunostomy. Cureus 2021, 13, e13264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sivasankar, A.; Johnson, M.; Jeswanth, S.; Rajendran, S.; Surendran, R. Small bowel volvulus around feeding jejunostomy tube. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 24, 272–273. [Google Scholar]
  38. Enyuma, C.O.A.; Adam, A.; Aigbodion, S.J.; McDowall, J.; Gerber, L.; Buchanan, S.; Laher, A.E. Role of the ultrasonographic ‘whirlpool sign’ in intestinal volvulus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J. Surg. 2018, 88, 1108–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Laméris, W.; van Randen, A.; van Es, H.W.; van Heesewijk, J.P.; van Ramshorst, B.; Bouma, W.H.; ten Hove, W.; van Leeuwen, M.S.; van Keulen, E.M.; Dijkgraaf, M.G.; et al. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: Diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ 2009, 338, b2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Yi, D.; Zhang, C.; Sun, N.; Lv, W.; Jiao, A. Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of small bowel volvulus in adults: A monocentric summary of a rare small intestinal obstruction. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wong, T.-C.; Tan, R.-C.; Lu, J.-X.; Cheng, T.-H.; Lin, W.-J.; Chiu, T.-F.; Wu, S.-H. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography as an Extension of the Physical Examination for Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: The Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Volvulus as a Rare Complication after Changing the Feeding Jejunostomy Tube. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051153

AMA Style

Wong T-C, Tan R-C, Lu J-X, Cheng T-H, Lin W-J, Chiu T-F, Wu S-H. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography as an Extension of the Physical Examination for Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: The Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Volvulus as a Rare Complication after Changing the Feeding Jejunostomy Tube. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wong, Tse-Chyuan, Rhu-Chia Tan, Jian-Xun Lu, Tzu-Heng Cheng, Wei-Jun Lin, Te-Fa Chiu, and Shih-Hao Wu. 2022. "Point-of-Care Ultrasonography as an Extension of the Physical Examination for Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: The Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Volvulus as a Rare Complication after Changing the Feeding Jejunostomy Tube" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop