Next Article in Journal
Usefulness of Imaging and Biological Tools for the Characterization of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Glaucoma after Penetrating Keratoplasty
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/diagnostics12051144
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1932.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Abdi et al. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1932

by
Ahmed Jibril Abdi
1,2,*,
Bo Mussmann
1,3,
Alistair Mackenzie
4,
Oke Gerke
1,5,
Gitte Maria Jørgensen
3,
Thor Eriksen Bechsgaard
3,
Janni Jensen
1,3,
Lone Brunshøj Olsen
3 and
Poul Erik Andersen
1
1
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
2
Department of Clinical Engineering, Region of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
3
Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
4
National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
5
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1144; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051144
Submission received: 20 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 5 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the Figure 2 on page nine of the paper. Figures 2 and 3 are duplicated, and the corrected version of Figure 2 is missing. This correct figure appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Abdi, A.J.; Mussmann, B.; Mackenzie, A.; Gerke, O.; Jørgensen, G.M.; Bechsgaard, T.E.; Jensen, J.; Olsen, L.B.; Andersen, P.E. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 12 01144 g002 550
Figure 2. VGA estimated marginal mean comparison across the imaging systems and image quality criteria for (a) the chest PA projection and (b) the chest LAT projection.
Figure 2. VGA estimated marginal mean comparison across the imaging systems and image quality criteria for (a) the chest PA projection and (b) the chest LAT projection.
Diagnostics 12 01144 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdi, A.J.; Mussmann, B.; Mackenzie, A.; Gerke, O.; Jørgensen, G.M.; Bechsgaard, T.E.; Jensen, J.; Olsen, L.B.; Andersen, P.E. Correction: Abdi et al. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1932. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051144

AMA Style

Abdi AJ, Mussmann B, Mackenzie A, Gerke O, Jørgensen GM, Bechsgaard TE, Jensen J, Olsen LB, Andersen PE. Correction: Abdi et al. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1932. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051144

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdi, Ahmed Jibril, Bo Mussmann, Alistair Mackenzie, Oke Gerke, Gitte Maria Jørgensen, Thor Eriksen Bechsgaard, Janni Jensen, Lone Brunshøj Olsen, and Poul Erik Andersen. 2022. "Correction: Abdi et al. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1932" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051144

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop