Cervical Power Doppler Angiography with Micro Vessel Blood Flow Indices in the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Acute Cervicitis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Patient Population
2.2. Transvaginal Ultrasound with Power Doppler Angiography (TV-PDA)
2.3. Measurement of Blood Flow Velocity Waveforms within the Uterine Cervix
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Visual Grading of Vascularity Findings on TV-PDU
3.2. Micro-vessel Flow Velocity Waveform Findings on TV-PDU
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kupestic, S.; Kurjak, A.; Pasalic, L.; Benic, S.; Iljas, M. The value of transvaginal color Doppler in the assessment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1995, 21, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alatas, C.; Aksoy, E.; Akarsu, C.; Yakin, K.; Bahceci, M. Hemodynamic assessment in pelvic inflammatory disease by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996, 70, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tinkanen, H.; Kujansuu, E. Doppler ultrasound findings in tubo-ovarian infectious complex. J. Clin. Ultrasound 1993, 21, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fortunato, S.J. The use of power Doppler and color power angiography in fetal imaging. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996, 174, 1828–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Y.C.; Yuan, C.C.; Hung, J.H.; Chao, K.C.; Yen, M.S.; Ng, H.T. Power Doppler angiographic appearance and blood flow velocity waveforms in invasive cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 2000, 79, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kurjak, A.; Zalud, I.; Jurkovic, D.; Alfirevic, Z.; Miljan, M. Transvaginal color flow Doppler for the assessment of pelvic circulation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1989, 68, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Y.C.; Tsui, K.H.; Hung, J.H.; Yuan, C.C.; Ng, H.T. High-frequency power Doppler angiographic appearance and microvascular flow velocity in recurrent scar endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 21, 96–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Y.C.; Yang, H.J.; Yuan, C.C.; Chao, K.C. Visual grading system, blood flow index, and tumor marker SCC antigen as prognostic factors in invasive cervical carcinoma. J. Med. Ultrasound 2006, 14, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Molander, P.; Sjoberg, J.; Paavonen, J.; Cacciatore, B. Transvaginal power Doppler findings in laparoscopically proven acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 17, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Romosan, G.; Bjartling, C.; Skoog, L.; Valentin, L. Ultrasound for diagnosing acute salpingitis: A prospective observational diagnostic study. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 1569–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Romosan, G.; Valentin, L. The sensitivity and specificity of transvaginal ultrasound with regard to acute pelvic inflammatory disease: A review of the literature. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014, 289, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ozbay, K.; Deveci, S. Relationships between transvaginal colour Doppler findings, infectious parameters, and visual analogue scale scores in patients with mild acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2010, 156, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tepper, R.; Aviram, R.; Cohen, N.; Cohen, I.; Holtzinger, M.; Beyth, Y. Doppler flow characteristic in patients with pelvic inflammatory disease: Responders versus non-responders to therapy. J. Clin. Ultrasound 1998, 26, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Suren, A.; Osmers, R.; Kuhn, W. 3D Color Power Angio TM imaging: A new method to assess intracervical vascularization in benign and pathological conditions. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 11, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Testa, A.C.; Ferrandina, G.; Distefano, M.; Fruscella, E.; Mansueto, D.; Basso, D.; Salutari, V.; Scambia, G. Color Doppler velocimetry and three-dimensional color power angiography of cervical carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 24, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rovas, L.; Sladjevicius, P.; Strobel, E.; Valentin, L. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional grayscale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 26, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Basgul, A.; Kavak, Z.N.; Bakirci, N.; Gokaslan, H. Three-dimensional ultrasound power Doppler assessment of the cervix: Comparison between nulliparas and multiparas. J. Perinat. Med. 2007, 35, 48–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Esin, S.; Yirci, B.; Yalvac, S.; Kandemir, O. Use of translabial three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for cervical assessment before labor induction. J. Perinat. Med. 2017, 45, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wataganara, T.; Yapan, P.; Moungmaithong, S.; Sompagdee, N.; Phithakwatchara, N.; Limsiri, P.; Nawapun, K.; Rekhawasin, T.; Talungchit, P. Additional benefits of three-dimensional ultrasound for prenatal assessment of twins. J. Perinat. Med. 2020, 48, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shao, J.; Shi, G.; Qi, Z.; Zheng, J.; Chen, S. Advancements in the application of ultrasound elastography in the cervix. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2021, 47, 2048–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feltovich, H.; Carlson, L. New techniques in evaluation of the cervix. Semin. Perinatol. 2017, 41, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Carlson, L.C.; Hall, T.J.; Rosado-Mendez, I.M.; Palmeri, M.L.; Feltovich, H. Detection of changes in cervical softness using shear wave speed in early versus late pregnancy: An in vivo cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2018, 44, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]







| Number | Vascular Hot Spot Grading | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | ||
| Simple Cervicitis | 26 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| Complex Cervicitis | 12 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + TOA | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + PCS | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + PCO | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + RO | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + BC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + ROC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Cervicitis + TOA+ OC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Normal Cervix | 41 | 30 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grading | Numbers of Vascular Hot Spot within Cervix (One Spot: 1 × 1 mm) |
|---|---|
| Grade 0 | Absence of vascular hot spot |
| Grade 1 | <5 vascular spots, not involve the endocervical canal |
| Grade 2 | >5 vascular spots, not involve the endocervical canal |
| Grade 3 | Involved the endocervical canal, without involved whole endocervix |
| Grade 4 | Involved the whole endocervix |
| A: Optimal Cutoff of Six Sonographic Parameters for Discriminating Acute Cervicitis Group (N = 38) with Control Group (N = 41) | ||||||||
| Area under the Curve | ||||||||
| Variables | Area | Optimal | Sensitivity | 95%LCL | 95%UCL | Specificity | 95%LCL | 95%UCL |
| PI | 0.93 | 1.1 | 92.1 | 78.6 | 98.3 | 85.4 | 70.8 | 94.4 |
| RI | 0.86 | 0.6 | 78.9 | 62.7 | 90.4 | 85.4 | 70.8 | 94.4 |
| PS | 0.59 | 8.5 | 50 | 33.3 | 66.6 | 56.1 | 39.7 | 71.5 |
| ED | 0.64 | 3.1 | 65.8 | 48.6 | 80.4 | 58.5 | 42.1 | 73.7 |
| TAMV | 0.54 | 5.2 | 60.5 | 43.4 | 75.9 | 46.3 | 30.7 | 62.6 |
| VI | 0.85 | 2.6 | 78.9 | 62.7 | 90.4 | 85.4 | 70.8 | 94.4 |
| B: Optimal Cutoff of Six Sonographic Parameters for Discriminating Complex Cervicitis Group (N = 12) with Simple Cervicitis Group (N = 26) | ||||||||
| Area under the Curve | ||||||||
| Variables | Area | Optimal | Sensitivity | 95%LCL | 95%UCL | Specificity | 95%LCL | 95%UCL |
| PI | 0.74 | 0.9 | 83.3 | 51.6 | 97.9 | 69.2 | 48.2 | 85.7 |
| RI | 0.69 | 0.6 | 75 | 42.8 | 94.5 | 65.4 | 44.3 | 82.8 |
| PS | 0.55 | 8.6 | 66.7 | 34.9 | 90 | 50 | 29.9 | 70.1 |
| ED | 0.58 | 3.3 | 75 | 42.8 | 94.5 | 46.2 | 26.6 | 66.6 |
| TAMV | 0.54 | 5.4 | 50 | 21.1 | 78.9 | 50 | 29.9 | 70.1 |
| VI | 0.69 | 2.4 | 75 | 42.8 | 94.5 | 65.4 | 44.3 | 82.8 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Ko, Y.-L.; Huang, J.Y.-J.; Yuan, C.-C.; Wang, P.-H.; Hsiao, C.-H.; Chu, W.-C. Cervical Power Doppler Angiography with Micro Vessel Blood Flow Indices in the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Acute Cervicitis. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051131
Wu Y-C, Chen C-H, Ko Y-L, Huang JY-J, Yuan C-C, Wang P-H, Hsiao C-H, Chu W-C. Cervical Power Doppler Angiography with Micro Vessel Blood Flow Indices in the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Acute Cervicitis. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051131
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Yi-Cheng, Ching-Hsuan Chen, Yi-Li Ko, Jack Yu-Jen Huang, Chiou-Chung Yuan, Peng-Hui Wang, Ching-Hua Hsiao, and Woei-Chyn Chu. 2022. "Cervical Power Doppler Angiography with Micro Vessel Blood Flow Indices in the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Acute Cervicitis" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051131
APA StyleWu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-H., Ko, Y.-L., Huang, J. Y.-J., Yuan, C.-C., Wang, P.-H., Hsiao, C.-H., & Chu, W.-C. (2022). Cervical Power Doppler Angiography with Micro Vessel Blood Flow Indices in the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Acute Cervicitis. Diagnostics, 12(5), 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051131

