Next Article in Journal
Multiparametric Characterization of Intracranial Gliomas Using Dynamic [18F]FET-PET and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Measurement and Modeling of the Optical Properties of Adipose Tissue in the Terahertz Range: Aspects of Disease Diagnosis
Previous Article in Journal
Complete Blood Cell Count-Derived Biomarkers and Clinical Studies: Is It Time for New Reporting Criteria? Comment on Anand et al. Utility of Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) as a Noninvasive Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5222 Cases. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1011
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Accuracy in Measuring the Enamel Thickness of Maxillary Incisors with Optical Coherence Tomography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Choroidal Thickness in a Hyperopic Pediatric Population

by
Vanessa Antonia Gerena Arévalo
1,2,* and
Jose Maria Ruiz-Moreno
1,3
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain
2
Sanitas La Moraleja University Hospital, 28050 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Castilla de la Mancha University, 13001 Ciudad Real, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(10), 2330; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102330
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 21 September 2022 / Accepted: 24 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Diagnostics and Monitoring of Human Diseases)

Abstract

:
Aims: To evaluate the choroidal thickness (CT) in hyperopic and emmetropic children using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional comparative study. Macular choroidal thickness and axial length of 62 eyes from hyperopic pediatric patients were studied. CT was determined at nine different macular locations. The results were compared to 66 eyes of healthy pediatric patients. Results: Study groups were classified as a hyperopic group (SE ≥ 2D) and an emmetropic group (SE < 2D). The hyperopic group have shorter AL than the emmetropic group (p < 0.001). The mean CT is greater in the hyperopic group (p = 0.039), and there are no significant differences between CT and gender (p = 0.389). Study participants were also classified by age (2–5 years old and 6–18 years old), and we observe differences in CT, but these differences are only significant for the 6–18 years old group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: CT in hyperopic pediatric populations is statistically thicker than in healthy pediatric patients. AL and SE have statistically significant correlations with CT values, and those correlations are seen in children in the ocular slow-growing phase (6–18 years old), and not in the early years (2–5 years old).

1. Introduction

Pathological hyperopia in childhood can lead to visual dysfunctions such as strabismus or amblyopia, and may be the origin of poor performance at school due to distraction, poor reading skills [1,2], or headaches. Previous research studied the associated factors of hyperopia, such as age, outdoor activities, axial length (AL), corneal radius [3,4,5,6], and genetics [7,8].
To evaluate the role of choroid variations in refractive status such as myopia and hyperopia, and after learning the essential role of the choroidal layer in ocular pathologies and its influence on the regulation of eye growth by remodeling the scleral extracellular matrix and controlling the defocus of the eye [9,10,11,12], new studies are using swept-source optical coherence tomography with spectral domain (SS-OCT) technology [13,14,15].
Prior studies investigated the choroidal thickness (CT) in general populations, concluding that there are correlations between the choroid and AL, age [16], and refractive status [3,17], but few studies compared mean or sub-foveal CT [13,16,18] in young hyperopic children without amblyopia.
In this cross-sectional study, we investigated choroidal characteristics using SS-OCT in children aged 4–17 years of age, evaluating choroidal morphological variations, comparing the total mean CT with age and AL, and differentiating between refractive status.

2. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethic Committee of Hospital Puerta de Hierro- Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (approval code PI 128/18).
Every parent and child understood the study protocol and provided written informed consent.
A sample of 128 eyes of 128 pediatric patients (4–17 years old), who met inclusion criteria: emmetropic (spherical equivalent (SE) 0-2D) or hyperopic (SE > 2D), was randomly collected in the ophthalmology consulting unit in Hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda and Hospital Sanitas La Moraleja. All the examinations were carried out in the afternoon to avoid diurnal variations in choroid thickness.
Exclusion criteria were amblyopia (anisometropia of 2 diopter (D) or greater), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of less than 20/40, astigmatism of 2D or greater, intraocular surgery of pathology, any systemic disease, or any birth or gestation problem.
All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, including BCVA using the Snellen test, sensorimotor examination, slit lamp biomicroscopy, cycloplegic refraction (with >6 mm of pupil dilation or non-reactive pupil using 3 drops of 1% cyclopentolate) (Colicursi Ciclopléjico, Alcon Co., Barcelona, Spain), and fundus examination.
For those patients who met the inclusion criteria, and after parental consent was obtained, the same investigator carried out complementary tests, and included non-contact optical biometry (IOL Master 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) to measure the AL and swept-source optical coherence tomography with spectral domain Triton (SS-OCT), using the 12-line radial (12 mm surface area) scan pattern program to study the CT.
The SS-OCT software was used to segment retinal layers and construct topographic maps. All the acquired images were inspected, and if automatic segmentation errors occurred, manual segmentation was performed.
The CT was measured between the Bruch membrane and the scleral interface, and after a correct segmentation (Figure 1), the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) circular grid (most frequent scanning protocol used) [19] was applied to the tomography maps, which divided the macula into three concentric circles centered on the fovea: the central foveal circle (1 mm), parafoveal circle (3 mm), and perifoveal circle (6 mm). Then, this was divided into the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal areas (Figure 2).
Refractive status groups (hyperopic and emmetropic) were classified using spherical equivalent (SE), and, using the meta-analysis conducted by Castagno et al. (2014) on hyperopia prevalence as a reference [3], the hyperopic group was defined as SE ≥ 2 diopters (D), and the emmetropic group as 0–<2 D.
In previous studies [5,17,20], a strong correlation between age and axial length is demonstrated, so, for our study, we classified patients by age and growth periods [21] to assess the correlation between axial length and choroid in each group:
  • 0–18 months old: the rapid postnatal phase where the axial length increases by 3.7–3.8 mm;
  • 2–5 years old: slower phase, decreased growth velocity (1.1–1.2 mm);
  • 6–18 years old: slow juvenile phase where the eye attains emmetropia.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) program was used for statistical analyses. The normality of the samples was evaluated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The variables in the hyperopic patients did not show a normal distribution. Thus, non-parametric statistics were used in this study. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare parameters between two groups (AL, CT, SE, age, gender). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used to detect influential factors in CT. Finally, a multiple regression analysis was carried out with the significant variables.

3. Results

The baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. The median age is 9 years (range: 4–17 years old); 43.8% are boys, and 56.3% are girls. In the hyperopic group, the median AL is 22.04 mm (interquartile range IQR 4.65) and the SE ranges between +2D and +9.25D. In the emmetropic group, the median AL is 22.97 mm IQR 3.5 and the SE ranges between 0 D and 1.88D (Table 1).
The hyperopic group shows a shorter AL than the emmetropic group, and has higher CT values in topographic measures than the emmetropic group (Figure 3).
As shown in Table 2, there are no significant correlations between mean CT and gender, and there is a non-significant direct correlation with age. Correlations between AL, SE, study groups, and mean CT show statistical significance.
All patients were separated into three groups based on age (0–18 months old, 2–5 years old, 6–18 years old) in order to analyze their CT and axial length. As there are no patients in the 0–18 months old group, we only have two groups.
As shown in Table 3 and Table 4, in the 2–5 years old age group, there is no clinical significance for CT and SE. The correlation between mean CT and AL is positive, but not significant (p = 0.305). In the 6–18 years old age group, there are significant correlations in CT values; the correlation between mean CT and AL is negative (−0.366) and clinically significant (p < 0.001).
Macular CT multiple regression analysis (Figure 4) including AL and SE and controlling for age has an adjusted R2 of 0.155 with high significance (p = 0.001). The SE is not statistically significant, and, thus, the equation to calculate mean CT is:
Mean macular CT(6–17 y) = 630.633 − 15.464 (LA)

4. Discussion

Studies were previously carried out on the multifunctionality of the choroid, showing that, apart from being the vascular layer for the retina, it contributes to thermoregulation and production of cytokines and growth factors, modulates intraocular pressure by controlling blood flow, intervenes in the drainage of aqueous humor, and adjusts the position of the retina by modifying its thickness to regulate the defocus of the eye, increasing its size if there is myopic defocus or decreasing it if its defocus is hypermetropic [10,12,15]. Zhang et al. described that this process can be altered by drugs that inhibit nitric oxide, preventing the increase in thickness secondary to myopic defocus [9], which opens up possibilities for new therapies for refractive alterations that are modified by the choroid, such as myopia.
Due to these studies, and with the possibility of being able to study the choroid with new technology, such as SS-OCT, we carried out a cross-sectional study of the retina, overcoming the pigment epithelium and allowing us to obtain knowledge on the pathophysiology and etiology of some ocular medical conditions [9,22].
In this study, we observed the possible relationship and role of choroidal thickness with refractive status (hyperopic and emmetropic) in pediatric patients (4–17 years old). We assessed the correlation between the two variables to open the possibility of future therapies that modify the choroid and improve pathologic hyperopia (>2D) in children, as is performed for myopia [8].
Initially, observing the results of choroidal thickness in nine CT zones of all patients, the zone with the thickest CT is the temporal zone, followed by the superior zone, central fovea, and inferior zone, and the thinnest zone is the nasal zone, as shown in adults in previous studies [13,16,17]. Therefore, we can say that, with ocular growth, although the structures increase in size, the vascular proportions in the choroid remain the same as in adulthood [9,22].
On the other hand, a comparison of CT between study groups according to refractive status (hyperopic and emmetropic) shows that hyperopic children (with an SE of more than 2D) have greater mean choroidal thickness than emmetropic children. This is clinically relevant, as it may suggest that refractive status may be influenced, among other things, by vascular changes in the choroid.
The SE is the number of diopters of each eye and the cause for which a patient is classified in refractive states. Usually, 0D is an emmetropic eye, positive values are hyperopic and negative values are myopic, but in pediatric populations, emmetropia is considered as an hyperopic eye less than 2D [3]. Thus, we wanted to assess the correlation that SE has with choroidal thickness, avoiding classification bias and ensuring satisfactory and clinically relevant results.
Xiong et al. report that in children, there are no significant differences between choroidal thickness and gender, and describe that AL increases with growth and choroidal thickness decreases [22]. However, there are studies that do not associate choroidal thickness with age in the pediatric population [11,16].
Due to this, we analyzed the correlation between AL and CT, which shows a statistically significant correlation in these patients. However, AL presents a very close relationship with age, as is demonstrated in several studies [3,17,22]. There is a greater emphasis on AL in pediatric populations due to ocular development, where the eye is born hyperopic with a length of 22 mm and, in three growth phases, reaches its normal length of 23–24 mm, achieving the emmetropia that occurs in adolescence.
For this reason, in this study, data on the relationship between AL and CT were analyzed in each growth phase of the eye. In our study, patients were classified into two groups: one from 2 to 5 years old, and the other from 6 to 17 years old. The results show that in the 2–5 years old group, there is no correlation between CT and SE, or AL, while in the 6–17 years old group, there is a relationship between these variables, i.e., the shorter the AL, the thicker the CT.
This may be because, in healthy eyes, the initial development presents a rapid growth rate of all ocular structures, with probably no relationship between the variables studied. However, when growth slows down (6–18 years old), relevant factors that modify the CT can be observed.
The result is an inverse correlation between these variables, i.e., the longer the axial length, the thinner the choroidal thickness, which is consistent with previous clinical studies [9,13,16] where patients with longer AL, such as myopes, have thinner choroidal thickness.
An analysis of the SE variable and its relationship with CT in each age group was also performed, with a similar result to the AL variable, where in the younger age group (2–5 years old), there is no relationship between both variables, while for the 6–17 years old group, there is a positive correlation between them, where the greater the spherical equivalent (more hyperopic), the thicker the choroidal thickness, which coincides with the previous results of the groups in this study according to refractive status.
In other words, having a greater or positive spherical equivalent, or being hyperopic, leads to a thicker choroidal thickness than in those with a lower spherical equivalent, or who are emmetropic in this case. However, when the multivariate analysis was performed, controlling for age, spherical equivalent, unlike AL, does not present a significant result. Therefore, unlike adults [9,10], children’s SE is probably not an important influencing factor for CT, or vice versa. This is different from the nerve fiber layer, as, according to Banc’s systematic review of pediatric retinal parameters in OCT [13], retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is not influenced by age or gender, but does have a positive association with spherical equivalent.
The multivariate analysis of choroidal thickness according to axial length explains only 15% of the result. Therefore, although it is important to study the results according to age groups in children, it would also be necessary to study other ophthalmologic and sociocultural data, such as hours in front of screens or close-up tasks and hours of play time outside the home, among others, to elucidate other causes that may influence choroidal thickness.
A limitation in this study is the number of patients in the 2–5 years old group, since this is much smaller than the second group and, thus, differences may not be seen for this reason.
In future studies, it will be important to bear the age parameter in mind when assessing changes and influential factors in ocular structures in the pediatric population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; methodology, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; software, V.A.G.A.; validation, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; formal analysis, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; investigation, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; resources, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; data curation, V.A.G.A.; writing—original draft preparation, V.A.G.A.; writing—review and editing, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M.; visualization, V.A.G.A.; supervision, J.M.R.-M.; project administration, V.A.G.A. and J.M.R.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and it was reviewed and approved by Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Ethic Committee, approval code PI 128/18, approved on 9 March 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kulp, M.T. Uncorrected hyperopia and preschool early literacy: Results of the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) study. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hashemi, H. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 2018, 30, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Castagno, V.D. Hyperopia: A meta-analysis of prevalence and a review of associated factors among school-aged children. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014, 14, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Uretmen, O. Oculometric features of hyperopia in children with accommodative refractive esotropia. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2003, 81, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wen, G. Prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in non-hispanic white and Asian children: Multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2109–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borchert, M. Risk factors for Hyperopia and Myopia in Preschool Children: The Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease and Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Studies. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1966–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, Q. Childhood gene-environment interactions and age-dependent effects of genetic variants associated with refractive error and myopia: The CREAM Consortium. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harb, E.N. Origins of Refractive Errors: Environmental and Genetic Factors. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 2019, 5, 47–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y. RPE and Choroid Mechanisms Underlying Ocular Growth and Myopia. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015, 134, 221–240. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nickla, D.L. The multifunctional choroid. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 144–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Atchison, D.A. Relative peripheral hyperopia does not predict development and progression of myopia in children. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 6162–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Summers, J.A. Visually Induced Changes in Choroidal Cytokine Production: Implications for Ocular Growth Regulation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021, 56, 6162–6170. [Google Scholar]
  13. Banc, A. Normative data for optical coherence tomography in children: A systematic review. Eye 2021, 35, 714–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hung, L.F. Vision-dependent changes in the CT of macaque monkeys. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wildsoet, C. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res. 1995, 35, 1175–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruiz-Moreno, J.M. Macular CT in normal pediatric population measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jin, P. Choroidal and Retinal Thickness in Children with Different Refractive Status Measured by Swept-Source Optical Coherence. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 168, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Öner, V. Influence of Hyperopia and Amblyopia on Choroidal Thickness in Children. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 26, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—An extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology 1991, 98, 786–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fujiwara, A. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal Japanese eyes. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 56, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lambert, S.R. Taylor & Hoyt’s Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 3rd ed.; ElSevier: Edinburg, UK, 2017; pp. 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiong, S. Changes in choroidal thickness varied by age and refraction in children and adolescents: A 1-year longitudinal study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 213, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Macular OCT with 12-line radial scan and retina layers defined.
Figure 1. Macular OCT with 12-line radial scan and retina layers defined.
Diagnostics 12 02330 g001
Figure 2. Macular OCT with EDTS grid, which divides the macula into three concentric circles centered on the fovea: the central foveal circle (1 mm), parafoveal circle (3 mm), and perifoveal circle (6 mm). This was divided into the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal areas.
Figure 2. Macular OCT with EDTS grid, which divides the macula into three concentric circles centered on the fovea: the central foveal circle (1 mm), parafoveal circle (3 mm), and perifoveal circle (6 mm). This was divided into the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal areas.
Diagnostics 12 02330 g002
Figure 3. Median CT in each choroid area in different study groups.
Figure 3. Median CT in each choroid area in different study groups.
Diagnostics 12 02330 g003
Figure 4. Scatterplot showing results for choroidal thickness and axial length in patients 6–17 years old.
Figure 4. Scatterplot showing results for choroidal thickness and axial length in patients 6–17 years old.
Diagnostics 12 02330 g004
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population.
ParameterHyperopic n = 62Emmetropic n = 66Mann–Whitney U
MedianIQRMedianIQR
AGE9129.513p = 0.682
AL22.044.6522.903.5p < 0.001
SE3.887.250.751.88p < 0.001
MEAN CT 303.22297279244.45p = 0.039
AL: axial length; SE: spherical equivalent; CT: choroidal thickness; IQR: interquartile range.
Table 2. Correlations between biometric factors and mean CT in all patients.
Table 2. Correlations between biometric factors and mean CT in all patients.
Mean CT SEXAGEALSE
Correlation coefficientsSTUDY GROUP−0.183
p = 0.039
0.154
p = 0.083
0.036
p = 0.684
0.486
p = < 0.001
−0.866
p = < 0.001
AGE0.023
p = 0.797
0.276
p = 0.002
−0.049
p = 0.582
AL−0.298
p = 0.001
−0.617
p = < 0.001
SE0.261
p = 0.003
AL: axial length; SE: spherical equivalent; CT: choroidal thickness.
Table 3. Correlations between biometric factors and mean CT (2–5 years old age group) n = 16.
Table 3. Correlations between biometric factors and mean CT (2–5 years old age group) n = 16.
Mean CT
Correlation coefficientsAL0.274
p = 0.305
SE0.018
p = 0.948
AL: axial length; SE: spherical equivalent; CT: choroidal thickness.
Table 4. Correlations between biometric factors and mean CT (6–17 years old age group) n = 112.
Table 4. Correlations between biometric factors and mean CT (6–17 years old age group) n = 112.
Mean CT
Correlation coefficientsAL−0.366
p = < 0.001
SE0.287
p = 0.002
AL: axial length; SE: spherical equivalent; CT: choroidal thickness.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gerena Arévalo, V.A.; Ruiz-Moreno, J.M. Choroidal Thickness in a Hyperopic Pediatric Population. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102330

AMA Style

Gerena Arévalo VA, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Choroidal Thickness in a Hyperopic Pediatric Population. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(10):2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gerena Arévalo, Vanessa Antonia, and Jose Maria Ruiz-Moreno. 2022. "Choroidal Thickness in a Hyperopic Pediatric Population" Diagnostics 12, no. 10: 2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop