Next Article in Journal
CSGBBNet: An Explainable Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Lavage, Simethicone, and Prokinetics—What to Swallow with a Video Capsule
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Time Course in Patients and Vaccinated Subjects: An Evaluation of the Harmonization of Two Different Methods

Laboratory Medicine Unit, Ospedale dell’Angelo, ULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, 30122 Venice, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1709; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091709
Submission received: 26 July 2021 / Revised: 6 September 2021 / Accepted: 14 September 2021 / Published: 18 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease)

Abstract

The time course of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is not yet well elucidated, especially in people who underwent a vaccination campaign. In this study, we measured the antibodies anti-S1 and anti-RBD with two different methods, both in patients and in vaccinated subjects. One hundred and eight specimens from 48 patients with COVID-19 (time from the onset of symptoms from 3 to 368 days) and 60 specimens from 20 vaccinated subjects (collected after 14 days from the first dose, 14 days and 3 months after a second dose of Comirnaty) were evaluated. We used an ELISA method that measured IgG against anti-Spike 1, and a chemiluminescence immunoassay that measured IgG anti-RBD. In the patients, the antibodies concentrations tended to decline after a few months, with both the methods, but they persisted relatively high up to nearly a year after the symptoms. In the vaccinated subjects, the antibodies were already detectable after the first dose, but after the booster, they showed a significant increase. However, the decrease was rapid, given that 3 months after the second vaccination, they were reduced to less than a quarter. The conversion of the results into BAU units improves the relationship between the two methods. However, in the vaccinated subjects, there was no evidence of proportional error after the conversion, while in the patients, the difference between the two methods remained significant.
Keywords: immune response; SARS-CoV-2 antibody response; vaccination; method comparison; harmonization immune response; SARS-CoV-2 antibody response; vaccination; method comparison; harmonization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dittadi, R.; Seguso, M.; Bertoli, I.; Afshar, H.; Carraro, P. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Time Course in Patients and Vaccinated Subjects: An Evaluation of the Harmonization of Two Different Methods. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091709

AMA Style

Dittadi R, Seguso M, Bertoli I, Afshar H, Carraro P. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Time Course in Patients and Vaccinated Subjects: An Evaluation of the Harmonization of Two Different Methods. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(9):1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dittadi, Ruggero, Mara Seguso, Isabella Bertoli, Haleh Afshar, and Paolo Carraro. 2021. "Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Time Course in Patients and Vaccinated Subjects: An Evaluation of the Harmonization of Two Different Methods" Diagnostics 11, no. 9: 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091709

APA Style

Dittadi, R., Seguso, M., Bertoli, I., Afshar, H., & Carraro, P. (2021). Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Time Course in Patients and Vaccinated Subjects: An Evaluation of the Harmonization of Two Different Methods. Diagnostics, 11(9), 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop