Next Article in Journal
Electromyographic Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Male Tennis Players: Which Role for Visual Input? A Proof-of-Concept Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect the Underlying Substrate in Patients with Frequent Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Application of a New SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection Kit (Colloidal Gold) in the Detection of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Anti-Inflammatory Treatment and Surgical Intervention on Endothelial Glycocalyx, Peripheral and Coronary Microcirculatory Function and Myocardial Deformation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Two-Arms Two-Stage Clinical Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/diagnostics11060996
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis in 2021

by
Weijia Li
1,*,
Dipan Uppal
1,
Yu Chiang Wang
1,
Xiaobo Xu
1,
Damianos G. Kokkinidis
2,
Mark I. Travin
3 and
James M. Tauras
4
1
Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
2
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
3
Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
4
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(6), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060996
Submission received: 16 May 2021 / Revised: 24 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 30 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging 2021)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cardiac amyloidosis is caused by the deposition of misfolded protein fibrils into the extracellular space of the heart. The diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis remains challenging because of the heterogeneous manifestations of the disease. There are many different types of amyloidosis with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis being the most common types of cardiac amyloidosis. Endomyocardial biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis and differentiating amyloid subtypes, but its use is limited because of the invasive nature of the procedure, with risks for complications and the need for specialized training and centers to perform the procedure. Radionuclide cardiac imaging has recently become the most commonly performed test for the diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis but is of limited value for the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. Positron emission tomography has been increasingly used for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and its applications are expected to expand in the future. Imaging protocols are under refinement to achieve better quantification of the disease burden and prediction of prognosis.

1. Introduction

Systemic amyloidosis is a multisystem disorder characterized by the formation and deposition of mis-folded protein fibrils which can result in multi-organ failure and death [1,2]. This condition is associated with significant disease burden with increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide over the past decades [3,4,5]. Studies have shown that at least 20 out of one million UK residents are estimated to have systemic amyloidosis with 65% being light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. The prevalence of wild type ATTR amyloidosis is estimated to be 10–25% in people over the age of 80 [6,7,8,9].
Cardiac amyloidosis is defined as a group of disorders that involve the deposition of amyloid protein in the cardiac tissue, leading to myocardial dysfunction [10]. Due to the increasing awareness of the disease, improved life expectancy, and advancements in diagnostic pathways, cardiac amyloidosis is currently diagnosed more frequently than in the past, with AL and ATTR amyloidosis being the most common types [3]. One population-based study focusing on Medicare beneficiaries in the United States revealed that between 2000 and 2012 the prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis increased from 8 to 17 cases per 100,000 person-year and the incidence increased from 18 to 55 cases per 100,000 person-year [11]. It is estimated that by 2050 there will be almost 25 million cases of wild-type ATTR globally [12,13].
AL amyloidosis is caused by the deposition of fragments of immunoglobulin and is associated with plasmacyte disorders such as multiple myeloma [14]. On the other hand, ATTR amyloidosis results from misfolded transthyretin, which normally functions as a transporter for thyroid hormone and retinol-binding protein [15]. ATTR amyloidosis can be further divided into wild-type which develops as people age and a hereditary form caused by inherited mutations [16,17].
AL cardiac amyloidosis and ATTR cardiac amyloidosis are clinically distinctive diseases and the diagnosis and differentiation are of vital importance, mainly because of the drastically different treatment strategies [18]. For example, the development of tafamidis, which acts on the rate-limiting step of the amyloidogenic process by binding to transthyretin, stabilizing the tetramer and slowing the dissociation into monomers, has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape for ATTR amyloidosis. On the other hand, the management for AL cardiac amyloidosis focuses on the control of the underlying plasmacyte disorder such as autologous stem cell transplantation and bortezomib-based treatment [19]. Thus, the early and accurate diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis is essential [20]. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis when combined with mass spectrometry to ascertain specific sub-types [21,22]. However, given the heterogeneity of cardiac amyloidosis, EMB may fail to diagnose the disease. Additionally, it is an invasive procedure by nature and thus can lead to serious complications such as right ventricle perforation, cardiac tamponade, and even death [23,24].
Nuclear imaging as an alternative diagnostic approach has become more popular among clinicians who suspect cardiac amyloidosis in their patients. In addition, compared to other imaging modalities such as echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), nuclear imaging is the only available non-invasive method that can accurately distinguish ATTR amyloidosis from AL cardiac amyloidosis within the appropriate clinical settings [25]. Nuclear imaging has been viewed as an essential part of the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and has been included in the multi-society consensus statement published in 2019 [26,27]. With this review article, we aim to summarize and discuss the current landscape of nuclear imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis, recent advancements and expected future changes in the field and how nuclear imaging can help cardiovascular clinicians diagnose cardiac amyloidosis.

2. Imaging Techniques and Radiotracers

Nuclear imaging for cardiac amyloidosis includes cardiac scintigraphy which adopts radiotracers from bone scintigraphy and the technique of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using targeted tracers for amyloid specific proteins (Figure 1). Nuclear imaging can offer direct visualization of disease activity and semi-quantification of the amyloid burden by calculating the ratio between concentration of the radiotracer in a specific volume of tissue and the concentration if the radiotracers are uniformly distributed. The ratio is also known as Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) [28]. Retention index (RI), calculated to assess the retention of radiotracers in myocardium over certain time interval, can be another important method measuring amyloid deposition quantitatively in PET imaging [29,30,31].

3. Cardiac Scintigraphy

Technetium (Tc)-labeled radiotracers from phosphate derivatives which are common bone scan agents have been investigated for the diagnosis of amyloidosis since the 1970s [32]. Cardiac scintigraphy utilizing those radiotracers has become more popular and widely used in clinical practice to assist the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. A large-sized multi-center study including 1217 patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis supported that cardiac scintigraphy with 99mTc-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD), 99mTc-pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP), or 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (99mTc-HMDP) had a 100% specificity and positive predictive value for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis if there are combined findings of grade 2 or 3 myocardial radiotracer uptake on cardiac scintigraphy and the absence of monoclonal protein in serum or urine [33]. Systematic review also confirmed the accuracy of scintigraphy diagnosing ATTR cardiac amyloidosis with both sensitivity and specificity above 90% [34]. Although it remains unclear how those bone-seeking agents can differentiate the types of amyloidosis, theories have postulated that the higher calcium containing compounds in ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, the unique characteristics of amyloidogenic fibrils, and the more indolent clinical course of ATTR amyloidosis allowing larger amount of amyloid protein to accumulate before the onset of symptoms might play a role [35]. However, the results of cardiac scintigraphy can be affected by multiple factors such as rib fracture and valvular/annular calcifications [36]. Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) technique can add a three-dimensional visualization to planar scintigraphy as well as more detailed and accurate assessment of radiotracer uptake in the myocardium wall as opposed to the blood pool [37]. Currently, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-PYP are the two most commonly used and studied radiotracers for the diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.

4. 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic Acid (99mTc-DPD) Scintigraphy

99mTc-DPD scintigraphy is usually performed as a whole-body planar imaging three hours after the injection of 99mTc-DPD radiotracer which can be followed by SPECT and non-contrast CT as adjuncts. 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy has high diagnostic accuracy for ATTR amyloidosis, especially when using the Perugini visual score. According to the Perugini visual score, the degree of radiotracer uptake is visually graded by comparing the radiotracer activity in the heart with its activity in the bones. Grade 0 means no cardiac uptake of radiotracer; grade 1 means that cardiac uptake is mild and less than skeletal uptake; grade 2 means that cardiac uptake is moderate and equals skeletal uptake; grade 3 means cardiac uptake is high and stronger than skeletal uptake. Grade 2 and above are considered as positive scan [38]. However, this protocol can lead to false positive results in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis [33]. Therefore, AL cardiac amyloidosis needs to be ruled out first with serum free light chains, serum protein electrophoresis, and urine protein electrophoresis before interpreting the results of cardiac scintigraphy. As the visual scoring system highly depends on reader expertise, it performed poorly when assessing the degree of amyloid burden [39]. In addition, Perugini visual score has not been found to have any prognostic significance in the overall survival for patients with cardiac amyloidosis [40].
Researchers have attempted to increase the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy and quantitatively assess amyloid burden by calculating the ratio between retention of radiotracer in the heart and retention of radiotracer in other body parts. Heart/whole-body ratio (H/WB), heart/pelvis ratio and heart/contralateral lung ratios (H/CL) are commonly used in clinical studies [41]. ATTR amyloidosis was found to have a higher H/WB ratio than AL amyloidosis. A study from Australia which enrolled biopsy-proven AL and ATTR cardiac amyloidosis has proposed a cut-off of H/WB ratio >0.091 with sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 88% for the diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis [42]. Additionally, an increasing H/WB ratio has been shown to correlate with major adverse cardiac events in patients with hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis [43]. Interestingly, researchers also found that 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy might have a role in the diagnosis of extracardiac AL amyloidosis when cardiac uptake is absent [44].
SPECT/CT has been developed to assist quantification in 99mTc-DPD Scintigraphy by acquiring peak Standard Uptake Values (SUVs) in the myocardium and offering three-dimensional assessment [45]. The cardiac peak SUV can be further normalized with the peak SUV on the bone or soft tissue as SUV retention index [46]. Studies have shown that cardiac SUV and SUV retention index are correlated well with Perugini visual scores and a peak SUV cut-off of 3.1 can separate patients with Perugini grade 2 and 3 clearly from those with Perugini grade 0 and 1 [47]. A recent study has found that the amyloid load in 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT has correlated well with strain values in echocardiography and biomarkers such as troponin and NT-proBNP (B-type Natriuretic Peptide) [48]. However, SPECT/CT was still unable to differentiate between patients with Perugini grade 2 and 3, which suggests that quantification of amyloid burden by 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT needs further improvement [39].

5. 99mTc-Pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) Scintigraphy

Although promising, 99mTc-DPD is not approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States. Hence, 99mTc-pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) is the only FDA-approved radiotracer in the US to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis [49]. Clinicians usually obtain anterior, lateral and left anterior oblique planar views as well as SPECT imaging following injection of 99mTc-PYP [50]. The degree of myocardial tracer uptake is graded using the semi-quantitative Perugini visual score and quantitative analysis by obtaining radiotracer activity within a region of interest (ROI) drawn over the heart corrected and its activity in the contralateral side of ROI to calculate a heart-to-contralateral (H/CL) ratio [51]. Unlike the 3-h protocol which is required in 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy, it has been found that a 1-h protocol in 99mTc-PYP imaging is comparable to the 3-h protocol for the diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. This translates to a 98% sensitivity and a 96% specificity of planar imaging and SPECT, identical between the 1-h and 3-h protocols [52]. The 1-h protocol reduces cost and time without compromising the diagnostic accuracy of the test and thus it is widely used.
Bokhari et al. found that subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis had a significantly higher cardiac visual score (p < 0.0001) as well as higher H/CL ratio (p < 0.00001) than AL amyloidosis and they concluded that using a H/CL ratio of ≥ 1.5, which is consistent with intensely diffused myocardial tracer retention, had a 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity (p < 0.0001) for identifying ATTR cardiac amyloidosis [35]. In a multicenter study which enrolled 171 participants, 99mTc-PYP scan demonstrated an overall 91% sensitivity and 92% specificity for detecting ATTR cardiac amyloidosis with area under the curve of 0.960 (95% CI, 0.930–0.981) [53]. It has also been noted that an H/CL ratio ≥ 1.6 predicts lower 5-year survival compared with group of patients with an H/CL ratio ≤ 1.6 (log-rank p = 0.02) [53]. Despite the high accuracy of the 99mTc-PYP scan visual score and H/CL ratio, the addition of SPECT is still necessary to rule out misclassified cases and distinguish myocardial activity from blood pool uptake [54]. A recent study showed that combining 99mTc-PYP and Thallium (Tl)-201 may improve diagnostic accuracy of both visual differentiation and H/CL semi-quantification for ATTR amyloidosis [55]. In addition, an integrated approach of utilizing both high sensitivity cardiac troponin T and 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy can significantly increase diagnostic yield of wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis [56]. A series of studies of 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy published from 2020 to 2021 are listed in Table 1.

6. Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is another imaging modality which can help diagnose cardiac amyloidosis [63]. PET imaging offers higher spatial resolution secondary to the decay of positrons and more accurate quantification of amyloid burden by using direct amyloid-binding radioactive tracers [64]. 11C-Pittsburgh B (11C-PiB) and 18F-labelled agents (such as 18F-florbetapir and 18F-florbetaben) are the two most common classes of radioactive tracers used for this purpose [65]. The tracers were originally developed to bind beta amyloid in the brain of patients with Alzheimer disease but it was reported later that they might have utility in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis as well [66]. Higher cardiac uptake of both 11C-PiB and 18F-labelled agents was constantly observed in both AL cardiac amyloidosis and ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, compared to controls in pilot studies [29,60,67,68,69,70]. Additionally, the radiotracer activities of both 11C-PiB and 18F-labelled agents have been found to be higher in AL cardiac amyloidosis than ATTR amyloidosis. A meta-analysis which combined the results of three pilot PET studies demonstrated that AL amyloidosis has significantly higher radiotracer activities than ATTR amyloidosis and thus PET imaging carries the potential to differentiate between AL and ATTR amyloidosis [71]. Overall, PET imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis is still in the early stages but future development of this technique is anticipated.

7. 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET Imaging

11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) PET imaging is a well-established technique for detecting β-amyloid in Alzheimer disease [72]. PiB, thioflavin-T, is an amyloid binding dye, and is theoretically able to bind to amyloid fibrils of any type, including amyloid fibrils in the myocardium [73]. A Swedish study included 10 patients with systemic amyloidosis (7 AL, 2 hereditary ATTR, 1 wild-type ATTR) and cardiac involvement, and the results showed increased myocardial 11C-PiB uptake in all the patients 15–25 min after injection of 11C-PiB. On the other hand, increased uptake was not seen in the five patients of the control group [29]. A Korean prospective study, which included 22 amyloidosis patients (15 with and 7 without cardiac involvement) and 10 normal controls, calculated the SUV and found significantly higher values in patients with cardiac amyloidosis than the control group (median 3.9 (range 1.7 to 19.9) vs. 1.0 (range 0.8 to 1.2), p < 0.001) [67].
11C-PiB PET imaging shows promise for identifying specific types of cardiac amyloidosis, especially for the AL subtype. A dual-center study showed that 11C-PiB PET imaging had 100% diagnostic accuracy of AL amyloidosis and that the uptake was significantly higher in AL cardiac amyloidosis compared to ATTR cardiac amyloidosis [58]. Researchers from Korea compared 11C-PiB PET imaging with endomyocardial biopsy in patients with chemotherapy-naive AL cardiac amyloidosis and they found that the degree of the 11C-PiB uptake on PET image was significantly higher in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and it corresponded well with the extent of amyloid deposition on the biopsy specimens. Patients with higher 11C-PiB uptake had high risks of composite adverse clinical outcomes including death, requiring heart transplantation and acute decompensated heart failure [59].
A study conducted in Japan revealed that 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy and 11C-PiB PET imaging can complement each other. In this study, the combination of positive 11C-PiB PET and negative 99mTc-PYP was observed in all AL cardiac amyloidosis and early onset V30M hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, while the combination of positive 99mTc-PYP and negative 11C-PiB PET was consistent in all wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, as well as the late-onset V30M and non-V30M hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis [57]. However, 11C-PiB PET imaging is limited by its short half-life of 20 min and the requirement of an onsite cyclotron for its production [74].

8. 18F-Labelled Agents PET Imaging

18F-labelled PET imaging is another promising imaging technique utilizing fluoride labelled radiotracers, primarily 18F-florbetapir and 18F-florbetaben. 18F-florbetapir and 18F-florbetaben are both FDA-approved radioactive tracers for Alzheimer’s disease with half-lives more than 100 min, which is a potential advantage over 11C-PiB PET for use in clinical practice. [75,76]. A pilot study in 2014 which enrolled 14 subjects (9 subjects with definite cardiac amyloidosis and 5 control subjects without amyloidosis) found that myocardial retention of 18F-florbetapir was higher in amyloid subjects, especially in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis [77]. An autoradiography study using myocardial autopsy sections yielded similar results, showing that 18F-florbetapir uptake was higher in amyloid samples versus controls but also found higher uptake in the AL groups compared to the ATTR samples [78]. Another pilot study in 2016 indicated that 18F-florbetaben PET imaging can accurately diagnose and differentiate between cardiac amyloidosis and hypertensive heart disease [69]. The percentage of myocardial 18F-florbetaben retention was found to be an independent determinant of myocardial dysfunction in cardiac amyloidosis [69]. A pilot study in 2019 involving 22 subjects (5 proven and 17 with clinical suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis) revealed that 18F-florbetaben-PET could further distinguish between the underlying amyloid types with higher retention in patients with AL amyloidosis than ATTR amyloidosis [79]. A recently published prospective study showed that delayed 18F-florbetaben cardiac uptake may distinguish AL cardiac amyloidosis from ATTR amyloidosis given higher mean SUV in patients with AL amyloidosis which was sustained over the whole acquisition period [60]. In addition, amyloid-directed PET can be used to assess therapy response. It has been shown that amyloid burden on PET after treatment with anti-inflammatory (AA), anti-myeloma (AL) and TTR-stabilizing (ATTR) therapies correlated well with changes in performance status and serological markers [79]. A series of most recent studies for 11C-PiB and 18F-labelled agents PET imaging can be found in Table 1.
Researchers have combined fluoride PET imaging with MRI in patients with cardiac amyloidosis to improve diagnostic accuracy of ATTR amyloidosis [61]. However, while PET imaging can distinguish between cardiac amyloidosis and controls, particularly when using quantitative analysis, it seems to be less sensitive when diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis than the more established nuclear medicine studies with 99mTc-PYP or 99mTc-DPD [62,80]. The comparison between cardiac scintigraphy and PET imaging is summarized in Table 2.
Our review highlights the importance of nuclear imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis with most updated clinical evidence and covers the most common radiotracers in this field. We not only elaborate on cardiac scintigraphy which is the more established nuclear imaging modality for cardiac amyloidosis, but also include the most recent evidence regarding PET imaging. However, we do acknowledge that other radiotracers, for example 99mTc-HMDP, are present and may play a role in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. In addition, we are unable to find large-sized clinical studies to compare between those radiotracers mentioned in this review.

9. Conclusions

Cardiac scintigraphy with SPECT is the current standard of care for diagnosing patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. However, PET imaging is another promising, non-invasive option for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and may help distinguish between AL amyloidosis and ATTR amyloidosis. The potential benefit of PET-based radiotracers includes better sensitivity for AL cardiac amyloidosis diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. Future studies are anticipated.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

James M. Tauras served as site principal investigator for several cardiac amyloidosis clinical trials and has received honoraria from Eidos Therapeutics, Inc., and Pfizer. There are no other disclosures relevant to this article.

References

  1. Alexander, K.M.; Orav, J.; Singh, A.; Jacob, S.A.; Menon, A.; Padera, R.F.; Kijewski, M.F.; Liao, R.; Di Carli, M.F.; Laubach, J.P.; et al. Geographic Disparities in Reported US Amyloidosis Mortality From 1979 to 2015: Potential Underdetection of Cardiac Amyloidosis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018, 3, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Blancas-Mejía, L.M.; Ramirez-Alvarado, M. Systemic Amyloidoses. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 745–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ravichandran, S.; Lachmann, H.J.; Wechalekar, A.D. Epidemiologic and Survival Trends in Amyloidosis, 1987–2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1567–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pinney, J.H.; Smith, C.J.; Taube, J.B.; Lachmann, H.J.; Venner, C.P.; Gibbs, S.D.J.; Dungu, J.; Banypersad, S.M.; Wechalekar, A.D.; Whelan, C.J.; et al. Systemic Amyloidosis in England: An epidemiological study. Br. J. Haematol. 2013, 161, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seo, S.R.; Jang, S.Y.; Lee, G.Y.; Choi, B.; Chun, H.; Cho, E.J.; Cho, S.-I. Prevalence of Amyloidosis in Korea. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nienhuis, H.L.; Bijzet, J.; Hazenberg, B.P. The Prevalence and Management of Systemic Amyloidosis in Western Countries. Kidney Dis. 2016, 2, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tanskanen, M.; Peuralinna, T.; Polvikoski, T.; Notkola, I.; Sulkava, R.; Hardy, J.; Singleton, A.; Kiuru-Enari, S.; Paetau, A.; Tienari, P.J.; et al. Senile systemic amyloidosis affects 25% of the very aged and associates with genetic variation in alpha2-macroglobulin and tau: A population-based autopsy study. Ann. Med. 2008, 40, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cornwell, G.G., III; Sletten, K.; Johansson, B.; Westermark, P. Evidence that the amyloid fibril protein in senile systemic amyloidosis is derived from normal prealbumin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1988, 154, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ueda, M.; Horibata, Y.; Shono, M.; Misumi, Y.; Oshima, T.; Su, Y.; Tasaki, M.; Shinriki, S.; Kawahara, S.; Jono, H.; et al. Clinicopathological features of senile systemic amyloidosis: An ante- and post-mortem study. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 1533–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Shah, K.B.; Inoue, Y.; Mehra, M.R. Amyloidosis and the heart: A comprehensive review. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gilstrap, L.G.; Dominici, F.; Wang, Y.; El-Sady, M.S.; Singh, A.; Di Carli, M.F.; Falk, R.H.; Dorbala, S. Epidemiology of Cardiac Amyloidosis–Associated Heart Failure Hospitalizations Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States. Circ. Heart Fail. 2019, 12, e005407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cuscaden, C.; Ramsay, S.C.; Prasad, S.; Goodwin, B.; Smith, J. Estimation of prevalence of transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis in an Australian subpopulation using bone scans with echocardiography and clinical correlation. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wechalekar, K.; Wechalekar, A.D. Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: When is a rare disease no longer a rare disease? J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sanchorawala, V. Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 1, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yamamoto, H.; Yokochi, T. Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: An update on diagnosis and treatment. ESC Heart Fail. 2019, 6, 1128–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Halatchev, I.G.; Zheng, J.; Ou, J. Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt-CA), previously known as senile cardiac amyloidosis: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and emerging therapies. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, 2034–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Puig-Carrion, G.D.; Reyentovich, A.; Katz, S.D. Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. Clin. Auton. Res. 2019, 29 (Suppl. 1), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Macedo, A.V.S.; Schwartzmann, P.V.; De Gusmão, B.M.; De Melo, M.D.T.; Coelho-Filho, O.R. Advances in the Treatment of Cardiac Amyloidosis. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2020, 21, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palladini, G.; Milani, P.; Merlini, G. Management of AL amyloidosis in 2020. Blood 2020, 136, 2620–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maurer, M.S.; Schwartz, J.H.; Gundapaneni, B.; Elliott, P.M.; Merlini, G.; Waddington-Cruz, M.; Kristen, A.V.; Grogan, M.; Witteles, R.; Damy, T.; et al. Tafamidis Treatment for Patients with Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1007–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pellikka, P.A.; Holmes, D.R.; Edwards, W.D.; Nishimura, R.A.; Tajik, A.J.; Kyle, R.A. Endomyocardial biopsy in 30 patients with primary amyloidosis and suspected cardiac involvement. Arch. Intern. Med. 1988, 148, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wisniowski, B.; Wechalekar, A. Confirming the Diagnosis of Amyloidosis. Acta Haematol. 2020, 143, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yilmaz, A.; Kindermann, I.; Kindermann, M.; Mahfoud, F.; Ukena, C.; Athanasiadis, A.; Hill, S.; Mahrholdt, H.; Voehringer, M.; Schieber, M.; et al. Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: Differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation 2010, 122, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. From, A.M.; Maleszewski, J.J.; Rihal, C.S. Current Status of Endomyocardial Biopsy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2011, 86, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, T.K.M.; Hassan, O.K.A.; Jaber, W.; Xu, B. Multi-modality imaging of cardiac amyloidosis: Contemporary update. World J. Radiol. 2020, 12, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dorbala, S.; Ando, Y.; Bokhari, S.; Dispenzieri, A.; Falk, R.H.; Ferrari, V.; Fontana, M.; Gheysens, O.; Gillmore, J.D.; Glaudemans, A.W.; et al. ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging. J. Card. Fail. 2019, 25, e1–e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dorbala, S.; Ando, Y.; Bokhari, S.; Dispenzieri, A.; Falk, R.H.; Ferrari, V.; Fontana, M.; Gheysens, O.; Gillmore, J.D.; Glaudemans, A.W.; et al. ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 2 of 2—Diagnostic Criteria and Appropriate Utilization. J. Card. Fail. 2019, 25, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kinahan, P.E.; Fletcher, J.W. Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy. Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI 2010, 31, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Antoni, G.; Lubberink, M.; Estrada, S.; Axelsson, J.; Carlson, K.; Lindsjö, L.; Kero, T.; Långström, B.R.; Granstam, S.-O.; Rosengren, S.; et al. In Vivo Visualization of Amyloid Deposits in the Heart with 11C-PIB and PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cuddy, S.A.M.; Bravo, P.E.; Falk, R.H.; El-Sady, S.; Kijewski, M.F.; Park, M.; Ruberg, F.L.; Sanchorawala, V.; Landau, H.; Yee, A.J.; et al. Improved Quantification of Cardiac Amyloid Burden in Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis: Redefining Early Disease? JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1325–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kero, T.; Sörensen, J.; Antoni, G.; Wilking, H.; Carlson, K.; Vedin, O.; Rosengren, S.; Wikström, G.; Lubberink, M. Quantification of 11C-PIB kinetics in cardiac amyloidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kula, R.; Engel, W.; Line, B. Scanning for soft-tissue amyloid. Lancet 1977, 309, 92–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gillmore, J.D.; Maurer, M.S.; Falk, R.H.; Merlini, G.; Damy, T.; Dispenzieri, A.; Wechalekar, A.D.; Berk, J.L.; Quarta, C.C.; Grogan, M.; et al. Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis. Circulation 2016, 133, 2404–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Treglia, G.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Bertagna, F.; Hazenberg, B.P.C.; Erba, P.A.; Giubbini, R.; Ceriani, L.; Prior, J.O.; Giovanella, L.; Slart, R.H.J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy in the assessment of cardiac transthyretin-related amyloidosis: A bivariate meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 1945–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bokhari, S.; Castaño, A.; Pozniakoff, T.; Deslisle, S.; Latif, F.; Maurer, M.S. 99m Tc-Pyrophosphate Scintigraphy for Differentiating Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis From the Transthyretin-Related Familial and Senile Cardiac Amyloidoses. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Garcia-Pavia, P.; Rapezzi, C.; Adler, Y.; Arad, M.; Basso, C.; Brucato, A.; Burazor, I.; Caforio, A.L.P.; Damy, T.; Eriksson, U.; et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: A position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 1554–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Grigoratos, C.; Aimo, A.; Rapezzi, C.; Genovesi, D.; Barison, A.; Aquaro, G.D.; Vergaro, G.; Pucci, A.; Passino, C.; Marzullo, P.; et al. Diphosphonate single-photon emission computed tomography in cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 307, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Perugini, E.; Guidalotti, P.L.; Salvi, F.; Cooke, R.M.T.; Pettinato, C.; Riva, L.; Leone, O.; Farsad, M.; Ciliberti, P.; Bacchi-Reggiani, L.; et al. Noninvasive etiologic diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis using 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Caobelli, F.; Braun, M.; Haaf, P.; Wild, D.; Zellweger, M.J. Quantitative 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT in patients with suspected ATTR cardiac amyloidosis: Feasibility and correlation with visual scores. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 1456–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hutt, D.F.; Fontana, M.; Burniston, M.; Quigley, A.; Petrie, A.; Ross, J.C.; Page, J.; Martinez-Naharro, A.; Wechalekar, A.D.; Lachmann, H.J.; et al. Prognostic utility of the Perugini grading of 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy in transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis and its relationship with skeletal muscle and soft tissue amyloid. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 18, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Gallini, C.; Tutino, F.; Martone, R.; Ciaccio, A.; Costanzo, E.N.; Taborchi, G.; Morini, S.; Bartolini, S.; Farsetti, S.; di Mario, C.; et al. Semi-quantitative indices of cardiac uptake in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis undergoing 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moore, P.T.; Burrage, M.K.; MacKenzie, E.; Law, W.P.; Korczyk, D.; Mollee, P. The Utility of 99m Tc-DPD Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis: An Australian Experience. Heart Lung Circ. 2017, 26, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rapezzi, C.; Quarta, C.C.; Guidalotti, P.L.; Pettinato, C.; Fanti, S.; Leone, O.; Ferlini, A.; Longhi, S.; Lorenzini, M.; Reggiani, L.B.; et al. Role of 99mTc-DPD Scintigraphy in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Hereditary Transthyretin-Related Cardiac Amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2011, 4, 659–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sachchithanantham, S.; Hutt, D.F.; Hawkins, P.; Wechalekar, A.D.; Quigley, A.-M. Role of 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy in imaging extra-cardiac light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 183, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Manrique, A.; Dudoignon, D.; Brun, S.; N’Ganoa, C.; Cassol, E.; Legallois, D.; Lavie-Badie, Y.; Agostini, D.; Lairez, O. Quantification of myocardial 99mTc-labeled bisphosphonate uptake with cadmium zinc telluride camera in patients with transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis. EJNMMI Res. 2019, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Scully, P.R.; Morris, E.; Patel, K.P.; Treibel, T.A.; Burniston, M.; Klotz, E.; Newton, J.D.; Sabharwal, N.; Kelion, A.; Manisty, C.; et al. DPD Quantification in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Novel Imaging Biomarker. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wollenweber, T.; Rettl, R.; Kretschmer-Chott, E.; Rasul, S.; Kulterer, O.; Rainer, E.; Raidl, M.; Schaffarich, M.P.; Matschitsch, S.; Stadler, M.; et al. In Vivo Quantification of Myocardial Amyloid Deposits in Patients with Suspected Transthyretin-Related Amyloidosis (ATTR). J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Löfbacka, V.; Axelsson, J.; Pilebro, B.; Suhr, O.B.; Lindqvist, P.; Sundström, T. Cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis 99mTc-DPD SPECT correlates with strain echocardiography and biomarkers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ruberg, F.L.; Miller, E.J. Nuclear tracers for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: Time to bone up? Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Castano, A.; Bokhari, S.; Brannagan, T.H.; Wynn, J.; Maurer, M.S. Technetium pyrophosphate myocardial uptake and peripheral neuropathy in a rare variant of familial transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis (Ser23Asn): A case report and literature review. Amyloid 2012, 19, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Bokhari, S.; Shahzad, R.; Castaño, A.; Maurer, M.S. Nuclear imaging modalities for cardiac amyloidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Masri, A.; Bukhari, S.; Ahmad, S.; Nieves, R.; Eisele, Y.S.; Follansbee, W.; Brownell, A.; Wong, T.C.; Schelbert, E.; Soman, P. Efficient 1-Hour Technetium-99 m Pyrophosphate Imaging Protocol for the Diagnosis of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, e010249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Castano, A.; Haq, M.; Narotsky, D.L.; Goldsmith, J.; Weinberg, R.L.; Morgenstern, R.; Pozniakoff, T.; Ruberg, F.L.; Miller, E.J.; Berk, J.L.; et al. Multicenter Study of Planar Technetium 99m Pyrophosphate Cardiac Imaging: Predicting Survival for Patients with ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016, 1, 880–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Asif, T.; Gomez, J.; Singh, V.; Doukky, R.; Nedeltcheva, A.; Malhotra, S. Comparison of planar with tomographic pyrophosphate scintigraphy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: Perils and pitfalls. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tamarappoo, B.; Otaki, Y.; Manabe, O.; Hyun, M.; Cantu, S.; Arnson, Y.; Gransar, H.; Hayes, S.W.; Friedman, J.D.; Thomson, L.; et al. Simultaneous Tc-99m PYP/Tl-201 dual-isotope SPECT myocardial imaging in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019, 27, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ochi, Y.; Kubo, T.; Nakashima, Y.; Baba, Y.; Hirota, T.; Yamasaki, N.; Yamashita, T.; Ueda, M.; Ando, Y.; Kitaoka, H. Integrated diagnostic approach to wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis with the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement and 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy. J. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Takasone, K.; Katoh, N.; Takahashi, Y.; Abe, R.; Ezawa, N.; Yoshinaga, T.; Yanagisawa, S.; Yazaki, M.; Oguchi, K.; Koyama, J.; et al. Non-invasive detection and differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis using 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy and 11C-Pittsburgh compound B PET imaging. Amyloid 2020, 27, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rosengren, S.; Clemmensen, T.S.; Tolbod, L.P.; Granstam, S.-O.; Eiskjær, H.; Wikström, G.; Vedin, O.; Kero, T.; Lubberink, M.; Harms, H.J.; et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of [11C]PIB Positron Emission Tomography for Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1337–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, S.-P.; Suh, H.-Y.; Park, S.; Oh, S.; Kwak, S.-G.; Kim, H.-M.; Koh, Y.; Park, J.-B.; Kim, H.-K.; Cho, H.-J.; et al. Pittsburgh B Compound Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With AL Cardiac Amyloidosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Genovesi, D.; Vergaro, G.; Giorgetti, A.; Marzullo, P.; Scipioni, M.; Santarelli, M.F.; Pucci, A.; Buda, G.; Volpi, E.; Emdin, M. [18F]-Florbetaben PET/CT for Differential Diagnosis Among Cardiac Immunoglobulin Light Chain, Transthyretin Amyloidosis, and Mimicking Conditions. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Andrews, J.P.M.; Trivieri, M.G.; Everett, R.; Spath, N.; MacNaught, G.; Moss, A.J.; Doris, M.K.; Pawade, T.; Van Beek, E.J.R.; Lucatelli, C.; et al. 18F-fluoride PET/MR in cardiac amyloid: A comparison study with aortic stenosis and age- and sex-matched controls. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, L.X.; Martineau, P.; Finnerty, V.; Giraldeau, G.; Parent, M.; Harel, F.; Pelletier-Galarneau, M. Comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging and 99mTc-pyrophosphate in cardiac amyloidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shukla, A.K.; Kumar, U. Positron emission tomography: An overview. J. Med. Phys. 2006, 31, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lee, J.H.; Lee, G.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, K.H.; Jeon, E.-S.; Lee, K.-H.; Kim, B.-T.; Choi, J.Y. Imaging Findings and Literature Review of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Primary Systemic AL Amyloidosis. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 49, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wolk, D.A.; Zhang, Z.; Boudhar, S.; Clark, C.M.; Pontecorvo, M.J.; Arnold, S.E. Amyloid imaging in Alzheimer’s disease: Comparison of florbetapir and Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2012, 83, 923–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Lhommel, R.; Sempoux, C.; Ivanoiu, A.; Michaux, L.; Gerber, B. Is 18F-Flutemetamol PET/CT Able to Reveal Cardiac Amyloidosis? Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, 747–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, S.-P.; Lee, E.S.; Choi, H.; Im, H.-J.; Koh, Y.; Lee, M.-H.; Kwon, J.-H.; Paeng, J.C.; Kim, H.-K.; Cheon, G.J.; et al. 11C-Pittsburgh B PET Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 8, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Dorbala, S.; Vangala, D.; Semer, J.; Strader, C.; Bruyere, J.R.; Di Carli, M.F.; Moore, S.C.; Falk, R.H. Imaging cardiac amyloidosis: A pilot study using 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 41, 1652–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Law, W.P.; Wang, W.Y.S.; Moore, P.T.; Mollee, P.N.; Ng, A.C.T. Cardiac Amyloid Imaging with 18F-Florbetaben PET: A Pilot Study. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Dietemann, S.; Nkoulou, R. Amyloid PET imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: A pilot study using 18F-flutemetamol positron emission tomography. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2019, 33, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, Y.J.; Ha, S. Cardiac amyloidosis imaging with amyloid positron emission tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cohen, A.D.; Rabinovici, G.D.; Mathis, C.A.; Jagust, W.J.; Klunk, W.; Ikonomovic, M.D. Using Pittsburgh Compound B for In Vivo PET Imaging of Fibrillar Amyloid-Beta. Charact. Porous Solids III 2012, 64, 27–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Levine, H., III. Soluble multimeric Alzheimer beta(1-40) pre-amyloid complexes in dilute solution. Neurobiol. Aging 1995, 16, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dorbala, S.; Cuddy, S.; Falk, R.H. How to Image Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Practical Approach. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1368–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Martínez, G.; Vernooij, R.W.; Padilla, P.F.; Zamora, J.; Cosp, X.B.; Flicker, L. 18F PET with florbetapir for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 11, CD012216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Martínez, G.; Vernooij, R.W.M.; Padilla, P.F.; Zamora, J.; Flicker, L.; Cosp, X.B. 18F PET with florbetaben for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 11, CD012883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Manwani, R.; Page, J.; Lane, T.; Burniston, M.; Skillen, A.; Lachmann, H.J.; Gillmore, J.D.; Fontana, M.; Whelan, C.; Hawkins, P.N.; et al. A pilot study demonstrating cardiac uptake with 18F-florbetapir PET in AL amyloidosis patients with cardiac involvement. Amyloid 2018, 25, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Park, M.-A.; Padera, R.F.; Belanger, A.; Dubey, S.; Hwang, D.H.; Veeranna, V.; Falk, R.H.; di Carli, M.F.; Dorbala, S. 18F-Florbetapir Binds Specifically to Myocardial Light Chain and Transthyretin Amyloid Deposits: Autoradiography Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kircher, M.; Ihne, S.; Brumberg, J.; Morbach, C.; Knop, S.; Kortüm, K.M.; Störk, S.; Buck, A.K.; Reiter, T.; Bauer, W.R.; et al. Detection of cardiac amyloidosis with 18F-Florbetaben-PET/CT in comparison to echocardiography, cardiac MRI and DPD-scintigraphy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Martineau, P.; Finnerty, V.; Giraldeau, G.; Authier, S.; Harel, F.; Pelletier-Galarneau, M. Examining the sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET for the imaging of cardiac amyloidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 11 00996 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of nuclear imaging modalities for cardiac amyloidosis.
Figure 1. Illustration of nuclear imaging modalities for cardiac amyloidosis.
Diagnostics 11 00996 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of a series of published studies of nuclear imaging in cardiac amyloidosis from 2020 to 2021.
Table 1. Summary of a series of published studies of nuclear imaging in cardiac amyloidosis from 2020 to 2021.
First AuthorPublication YearRadiotracerMethodResults
Caobelli et al. [39]202099mTc-DPDRetrospective single-center study including 13 patients with 8 ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and 5 not.Myocardial SUVmax and SUVpeak showed strong correlation with Perugini score but a great degree of overlap between patients in Perugini score 2 and 3.
Scully et al. [46]202099mTc-DPDSingle-center, retrospective study of 100 DPD scan (40 were Perugini grade 0, 12 were grade 1, 41 were grade 2, and 7 were grade 3).SUV retention index which is calculated as: ((Cardiac SUVpeak/Vertebral SUVpeak) × paraspinal muscle SUVpeak) increased across all Perugini grades. Cardiac SUVpeak and SUV retention index had excellent diagnostic accuracy with the area under the curve being 0.999.
Wollenweber et al. [47]202099mTc-DPD32 patients with bioptically-proven or suspected cardiac ATTR amyloidosis received a DPD total body bone scan with additional SPECT/CT.Patients with Perugini grade 2 and 3 can be clearly separated from those with Perugini grade 0 and 1 with a SUVpeak cut-off of 3.1.
Löfbacka et al. [48]202099mTc-DPD48 patients with genetically-verified hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and positive 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT were assessed manually for amyloid burden.Statistically significant correlation between DPD uptake and all echocardiographic strain parameters in all regions, as well as the biomarkers of troponin and logarithmic NT-proBNP.
Masri et al. [52]202099mTc-PYP233 patients with suspected ATTR cardiac amyloidosis underwent planar and SPECT imaging at 1 and 3 hours with a positive scan considered as visual grades ≥ 2 and heart to contralateral ratios ≥ 1.51-hour and 3-hour protocols have identical SPECT results. Planar imaging at 1 hour had 98% sensitivity and 96% specificity.
Asif et al. [54]202099mTc-PYP99mTc-PYP scintigraphy was performed including 1-hour planar imaging assessing visual score as well as H/CL ratio and SPECTVisual score had a diagnostic accuracy of 98% for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis but addition of H/CL ratio reduced the accuracy. SPECT is necessary to perform to prevent misdiagnoses.
Tamarappoo et al. [55]202099mTc-PYP/Tl-201Dual isotope of 99mTc-PYP/Tl-201 SPECT was performed in 112 patients suspicious of cardiac amyloidosis (39 ATTR, 26 AL, 47 no amyloidosis) and compared with single isotope. H/CL ratio was calculated.Interobserver agreement of visual assessment was better with dual-isotope SPECT. Area under the curve for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis by visual assessment and H/CL ratio were higher with dual-isotope SPECT than single-isotope SPECT.
Ochi et al. [56]202099mTc-PYP39 patients with wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis with 8 patients in group A who were diagnosed before the introduction of hs-cTnT and 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy and 31 patients in group B who were diagnosed after the introduction of the two tools.Increased diagnostic yield in patients who used the combined approach using hs-cTnT and 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy.
Takasone et al. [57]202099mTc-PYP, 11C-PiB17 patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis, 22 patients with hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, and 8 patients with wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis underwent both 11C-PiB PET imaging and 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy.All patients with cardiac amyloidosis are detectable by 99mTc-PYP or 11C-PiB PET imaging. The combination of positive 11C-PiB PET and negative 99mTc-PYP was observed in all AL cardiac amyloidosis and early onset V30M hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, while the combination of positive 99mTc-PYP and negative 11C-PiB PET was consistent in all wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, as well as the late-onset V30M and non-V30M hereditary ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.
Rosengren et al. [58]202011C-PiBA dual-center study included 51 subjects with 36 patients with known cardiac amyloidosis and increased wall thickness (15 AL, 21 ATTR) and 15 control patients. All the subjects underwent 11C-PiB PET imaging and echocardiography.High diagnostic accuracy of both visual inspection and semi-quantitative methods of 11C-PiB PET imaging to distinguish cardiac amyloidosis from controls. The uptake of 11C-PiB was significantly higher in AL cardiac amyloidosis than ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.
Lee et al. [59]202011C-PiB41 chemotherapy-naïve AL cardiac amyloidosis patients were enrolled. Myocardial uptake of 11C-PiB on PET was compared with endomyocardial biopsy for quantification of amyloid deposit.The degree of myocardial 11C-PiB uptake is significantly higher in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and higher degrees of uptake was associated with lowest survival from death, heart transplantation and acute decompensated heart failure.
Genovesi et al. [60]202118F-florbetaben40 patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses of cardiac amyloidosis (20 AL amyloidosis, 20 ATTR amyloidosis) and 20 patients with non-cardiac amyloidosis pathology.Patients with AL amyloidosis have higher mean SUV, heart-to-background uptake ratio, and molecular volume than ATTR amyloidosis and patients with non-cardiac amyloidosis.
Andrews et al. [61]202018F-fluorideA prospective multicenter study included 53 patients (10 ATTR and 8 AL cardiac amyloidosis, 13 controls and 22 with aortic stenosis). All patients were scanned by 18F-fluoride PET/MRI. SUV and tissue-to-background ratio (TBRmean) were obtained in the septum and areas of late gadolinium enhancement.TBRmean values are higher in ATTR amyloidosis than controls and those with AL amyloidosis. A TBRmean threshold >1.14 in areas of late gadolinium enhancement has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for ATTR amyloidosis compared to AL amyloidosis.
Zhang et al. [62]202018F-sodium fluoride and 99mTc-PYP12 subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and 5 controls underwent 18F-sodium fluoride and 99mTc-PYP-SPECT/CT.Visual assessment of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT had a sensitivity of 25% for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis when compared with 100% sensitivity in 99mTc-PYP-SPECT/CT.
99mTc-DPD: 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid; 99mTc-PYP: 99mTc-pyrophosphate; 11C-PiB: 11C-Pittsburgh compound B.
Table
Table 2. Comparison between the four most-studied nuclear imaging techniques for cardiac amyloidosis.
Table 2. Comparison between the four most-studied nuclear imaging techniques for cardiac amyloidosis.
Imaging TechniqueRadiotracer ComponentRadiotracer AnalogRadiotracers Original ApplicationAmyloidosis TypeAdvantageDisadvantage
99mTc-DPD Scintigraphy99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acidPhosphateBone scintigraphyATTR amyloidosis >> AL amyloidosis.High diagnostic accuracy for ATTR when combined with SPECT and the absence of a monoclonal protein in serum or urine.Limited on accurate quantification of amyloid burden.
99mTc-PYP Scintigraphy99mTc-Pyrophosphate
11C-PiB PET imagingN-methyl-[11C]2-(4′-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazoleThioflavin-TBrain imaging in Alzheimer dementia.AL amyloidosis > ATTR amyloidosis.Detect both AL and ATTR amyloidosis, ability to detect early disease, short study session. Can complement 99mTc-PYP Scintigraphy.Requirement of onsite cyclotron for generation; high synthesis cost with 20-min half-life.
18F-labelled agents PET imaging18F-florbetapir, 18F-florbetaben18F-NaFStilbeneCan diagnose both AL amyloidosis and ATTR amyloidosis. Allows for early detection of cardiac amyloidosis, aid in therapy response assessment.Lack of large-sized studies to confirm its efficacy.
99mTc-DPD: 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid; 99mTc-PYP: 99mTc-pyrophosphate; 11C-PiB: 11C-Pittsburgh compound B.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Uppal, D.; Wang, Y.C.; Xu, X.; Kokkinidis, D.G.; Travin, M.I.; Tauras, J.M. Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis in 2021. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060996

AMA Style

Li W, Uppal D, Wang YC, Xu X, Kokkinidis DG, Travin MI, Tauras JM. Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis in 2021. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(6):996. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Weijia, Dipan Uppal, Yu Chiang Wang, Xiaobo Xu, Damianos G. Kokkinidis, Mark I. Travin, and James M. Tauras. 2021. "Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis in 2021" Diagnostics 11, no. 6: 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060996

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop