Next Article in Journal
Development of a Prediction Model for the Occurrence of Stenosis or Occlusion after Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization
Next Article in Special Issue
Correlation between Pre- and Post-Surgical Findings for Long-Term Neurocognitive and Behaviour Development Due to Posterior Fossa Pilocytic Astrocytomas: The Trend after 10 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Imaging of Fibrous Dysplasia Protuberans, an Extremely Rare Exophytic Variant of Fibrous Dysplasia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Detection Rate of H3K27M Mutations in Cerebrospinal Fluid Obtained from Lumbar Puncture in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Midline Gliomas
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Synchronous Presentation of Rare Brain Tumors in Von Hippel–Lindau Syndrome

Diagnostics 2021, 11(6), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061005
by Mariachiara Lodi 1, Antonio Marrazzo 2, Antonella Cacchione 1, Marina Macchiaiolo 3, Antonino Romanzo 4, Luciano Mastronardi 5, Francesca Diomedi-Camassei 6, Alessia Carboni 2, Andrea Carai 7, Carlo Gandolfo 2, Lidia Monti 8, Angela Mastronuzzi 1 and Giovanna Stefania Colafati 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2021, 11(6), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061005
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Nicely presented report!

Lines 169 - 184 are superfluous and may be removed. 

Please add post-op images following cranial surgeries. 

Please add histopathology images from hemangioblastoma and ELST.

Was an ophthalmology exam performed? Fundcoscopy results could be reported in text and as a panel in Figure 2. 

Figures 3 and 4 do not add much to the report. 

Author Response

.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present the investigation of a patient who initially presents with an endolymphatic sac tumour and is eventually diagnosed with Von Hippel Lindau disease.  ELST are a more uncommon manifestation of VHL disease, and this article brings attention this as a portal of VHL diagnosis.

The article is well written from the radiologic and clinical perspective.  Some improvements include:

  1. The authors suggest a thorough workup of a hemangioblastoma is merited (line 131).  This is true.  The converse for ELST should also be mentioned.  Should all ELST have a VHL workup?
  2. The genetic section (line 185) seems separate, and could be split to bring up some of the background of the genetics of VHL in the introduction.
  3. The VHL variant in c. and p. along with NM number and the interpretation should be added.  The subtype of VHL should be also added (VHL type 1, 2a, 2b, and 2c).
  4. The diagnostic criteria for VHL disease varies (Danish criteria, VHL Alliance etc).  This should be mentioned.
  5. Minor typos (ELST, pathological variant)

Author Response

Comments to Author
Review -1185267


1.      The authors suggest a thorough workup of a hemangioblastoma is merited (line 131). This is true. The converse for ELST should also be mentioned. Should all ELST have a VHL workup?

 

Although these tumors also occur sporadically, ELSTs are common in patients with VHL disease, within an incidence of approximately 15 percent on detailed evaluation. In one series, for example, bilateral tumors were present in 28 percent of the patients with VHL versus 1 percent in the patients without VHL disease.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop