Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) for Spanish Dancers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Instruments
2.2. Cross-Cultural Adaptation
2.3. Participants
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Allen, N.; Nevill, A.M.; Brooks, J.H.M.; Koutedakis, Y.; Wyon, M.A. The effect of a comprehensive injury audit program on injury incidence in ballet: A 3-year prospective study. Clin. J. Sports Med. 2013, 23, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Batista, C.G.; Martins, E.O. The prevalence of pain in classical ballet dancers. J. Health Sci. Inst. 2010, 28, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
- Aquino, C.F.; Cardoso, V.A.; Machado, N.C.; Franklin, J.S.; Augusto, V.G. Análise da relação entre dor lombar e desequilíbrio de força muscular em bailarinas. Fisioter. Mov. 2010, 23, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picon, A.P.; Franchi, S.S. Análise antropométrica dos pés de praticantes de ballet clássico que utilizam sapatilhas de ponta. Rev. Uniara 2007, 20, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simões, R.D.; Anjos, A.F.P. O ballet clássico e as implicações anatômicas e biomecânicas de sua prática para os pés e tornozelo. Rev. Fac. Educ. Fís. Unicamp 2010, 8, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bronner, S.; McBride, C.; Gill, A. Musculoskeletal injuries in professional modern dancers: A prospective cohort study of 15 years. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 36, 1880–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkumar, P.N.; Farber, J.; Arnouk, J.; Varner, K.E.; McCulloch, P.C. Injuries in a professional ballet dance company: A 10-year retrospective study. J. Dance Med. Sci. 2016, 20, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leanderson, C.; Leanderson, J.; Wykman, A.; Strender, L.E.; Johansson, S.E. Sundquist, K. Musculoskeletal injuries in young ballet dancers. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011, 19, 1531–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Seters, C.; Van Rijn, R.M.; Van Middelkoop, M.; Stubbe, J.H. risk factors for lower-extremity injuries among contemporary dance students. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2020, 30, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bronner, S.; Chodock, E.; Urbano, I.E.R.; Smith, T. Psychometric properties of the dance functional outcome survey (dfos): Reliability, validity and responsiveness. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2019, 49, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bronner, S.; Novella, T.; Becica, L. Management of a delayed-union sesamoid fracture in a dancer. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2007, 37, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bronner, S.; Ojofeitimi, S.; Rose, D. Repair and rehabilitation of extensor hallucis longus and brevis tendon lacerations in a professional dancer. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2008, 38, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Filipa, A.; Barton, K. Physical therapy rehabilitation of an adolescent pre-professional dancer following os trigonum excision: A case report. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018, 48, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ojofeitimi, S.; Bronner, S.; Becica, L. Conservative management of second metatarsophalangeal joint instability in a professional dancer: A case report. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2016, 46, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roussel, N.A.; De Kooning, M.; Nijs, J.; Wouters, K.; Cras, P.; Daenen, L. The Role of sensorimotor incongruence in pain in professional dancers. Mot. Control. 2015, 19, 271–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, T.R. Management of dancers with symptomatic accessory navicular: 2 case reports. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2012, 42, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobrino, F.J.; Guillen, P. Overuse injuries in professional ballet: Influence of age and years of professional practice. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2017, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De-la-Cruz-Torres, B.; Barrera-García-Martín, I.; Albornoz-Cabello, M. Immediate effects of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation versus physical exercise on performance of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in professional dancers: A randomised clinical trial. Acupunct. Med. 2019, 37, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De-la-Cruz-Torres, B.; Barrera-García-Martín, I.; Romero-Morales, C. Comparative effects of one-shot electrical stimulation on performance of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in professional dancers: Percutaneous versus transcutaneous? Neuromodulation 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De-la-Cruz-Torres, B.; Barrera-García-Martín, I.; De-la-Cueva-Reguera, M.; Bravo-Aguilar, M.; Abuín-Porras, V.; Romero-Morales, C. Ultrasound imaging features of the Achilles Tendon in dancers. Is there a correlation between the imaging and clinical findings? A cross-sectional study. Phys. Ther. Sport. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maher, C.G.; Costa, L.O.P. The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 2007, 11, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, T.R.; Filipa, A.; Paterno, M.; Bronner, S. Reliability and Validity of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) in Adolescent Dancers. In Proceedings of the APTA Combined Sections Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 21–24 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ware, J.E., Jr.; Snow, K.K.; Kosinski, M.; Gandek, B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, MA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Valovich-McLeod, T.C.; Bay, R.C.; Parsons, J.T.; Sauers, E.L.; Snyder, A.R. Recent injury and health-related quality of life in adolescent athletes. J. Athl. Train. 2009, 44, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alonso, J.; Prieto, L.; Anto, J.M. The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): An instrument for measuring clinical results. Med. Clin. 1995, 104, 771–776. [Google Scholar]
- Beaton, D.E.; Bombardier, C.; Guillemin, F.; Ferraz, M.B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000, 25, 3186–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wild, D.; Grove, A.; Martin, M.; Eremenco, S.; McElroy, S.; Verjee-Lorenz, A.; Erikson, P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005, 8, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sperber, A.D. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 2004, 126 (Suppl. 1), S124–S128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suhr, D.D. Principal component analysis vs. exploratory factor analysis. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual SAS® Users Group International Conference (SUGI 30), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 10–13 April 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Hajian-Tilaki, K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J. Biomed. Inform. 2014, 48, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Munro, B.H. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research, 3rd ed.; JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Domholdt, E. Physical Therapy Research: Principles and Applications; W. B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Fowler, J.; Jarvis, P.; Chevannes, M. Practical Statistics for Nursing and Health Care; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Naal, F.D.; Impellizzeri, F.M.; Von Eisenhart-Rothe, R.; Mannion, A.F.; Leunig, M. Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of the hip outcome score in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Arthr. Care Res. 2012, 64, 1770–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, R.L. Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research; Aspen: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Terwee, C.B.; Bot, S.D.; De Boer, M.R.; Vvan der Windt, D.A.; Knol, D.L.; Dekker, J.; Bouer, L.M.; De Vet, H.C. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2007, 60, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yong, A.G.; Pearce, S. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 2013, 9, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokkink, L.B.; Terwee, C.B.; Patrick, D.L.; Alonso, J.; Stratford, P.W.; Knol, D.L.; Bouter, L.M.; De Vet, H.C. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010, 63, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- De Knikker, R.; El Hadouchi, M.; Velthuis, M.; Wittink, H. The Dutch version of the Victoria Institute of Sports Assessment—Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Dutch patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Nederlands Tijdschr. Fysiother. 2008, 118, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez-Sanchez, S.; Poveda-Pagan, E.J.; Alakhdar-Mohmara, Y.; Hidalgo, M.D.; Fernandez-de-Las-Penas, C.; Arias-Buria, J.L. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire for spanish athletes with achilles tendinopathy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018, 48, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martin, R.L.; Irrgang, J.J.; Burdett, R.G.; Conti, S.F.; Van Swearingen, J.M. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005, 26, 968–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binkley, J.M.; Stratford, P.W.; Lott, S.A.; Riddle, D.L. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys. Ther. 1999, 79, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Martin, R.L.; Kelly, B.T.; Philippon, M.J. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22, 1304–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marx, R.G.; Jones, E.C.; Allen, A.A.; Altchek, D.W.; O’Brien, S.J.; Rodeo, S.A.; Williams, R.J.; Warren, R.F.; Wickiewicz, T.L. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2001, 83, 1459–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stratford, P.W.; Binkley, F.M.; Riddle, D.L. Health status measures: Strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys. Ther. 1996, 76, 1109–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandrekar, J.N. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, 1315–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Williams, V.J.; Piva, S.R.; Irrgang, J.J.; Crossley, C.; Fitzgerald, G.K. Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2012, 42, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yeung, T.S.; Wessel, J.; Stratford, P.; Macdermid, J. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale for inpatients of an orthopaedic rehabilitation ward. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2009, 39, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Male | Female | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Subjects (%) | 31 (24%) | 96 (76%) | 127 (100%) |
Professional dancers (%) | 17 (13%) | 40 (32%) | 57 (45%) |
Pre-professional Student (%) | 14 (11%) | 56 (44%) | 70 (55%) |
Age (yrs) | 21.03 ± 4.69 | 19.82 ± 4.14 | 20.12 ± 4.30 |
Dance Training (yrs) | 10.90 ± 4.95 | 11.55 ± 5.86 | 11.39 ± 5.64 |
Dance training | |||
Ballet | 18 (14%) | 45 (36%) | 63 (50%) |
Contemporary | 13 (10%) | 39 (31%) | 52 (41%) |
Contemporary/Ballet | 0 (0%) | 12 (9%) | 12 (9%) |
Professional experience (yrs) | 5.00 ± 4.23 | 4.83 ± 3.40 | 4.89 ± 3.63 |
Status (%) | |||
Healthy | 10 (8%) | 49 (38%) | 59 (46%) |
Injured | 21 (17%) | 47 (37%) | 68 (54%) |
Group | Combined | Healthy | Injured | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICC (95% CI) | SEM | ICC (95% CI) | SEM | ICC (95% CI) | SEM | ||
DFOS Total | 0.99 (0.98–0.99) | 1.60 | 0.92 (0.87–0.96) | 1.93 | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | 1.49 | |
ADL | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.92 | 0.89 (0.80–0.94) | 1.29 | 0.99 (0.97–0.99) | 0.66 | |
Overall Activity | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.71 (0.48–0.84) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Movement Quality | 0.96 (0.95–0.98) | 0.84 (0.72–0.91) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Walking | 0.94 (0.91–0.96) | 0.82 (0.68–0.90) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Stairs | 0.97 (0.95–0.98) | 0.66 (0.39–0.81) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Stability/Symptoms | 0.93 (0.89–0.95) | 0.81 (0.66–0.89) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Pain | 0.92 (0.88–0.95) | 0.77 (0.59–0.87) | 0.99 (0.98–0.99) | ||||
Technique | 0.98 (0.98–0.99) | 1.02 | 0.91 (0.84–0.95) | 1.40 | 0.99 (0.97–0.99) | 0.97 | |
Plié | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.70 (0.47–0.83) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Developpé | 0.95 (0.93–0.97) | 0.68 (0.44–0.82) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Relevé Balance | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.79 (0.63–0.89) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Rond de Jambe | 0.93 (0.90–0.96) | 0.69 (0.45–0.83) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Kneeling | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.92 (0.86–0.95) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Turning | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | 0.86 (0.73–0.91) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Jumping | 0.96 (0.95–0.98) | 0.79 (0.62–0.88) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) | ||||
Grand Allegro | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | 0.86 (0.75–0.92) | 0.99 (0.99–0.99) |
Score | PCS | R (95% CI) | MCS | r (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
DFOS Total | PCS** | 0.61 (0.49–0.71) | MCS | −0.26 (−0.42– −0.09) |
ADL | PCS** | 0.56 (0.43–0.67) | MCS | −0.24 (−0.40– −0.07) |
Overall Activity | PF** | 0.30 (0.13–0.45) | VT | 0.05 (−0.12–0.22) |
Overall Activity | RP** | 0.26 (0.09–0.42) | SF | 0.03 (−0.14–0.20) |
Movement Quality | PF** | 0.52 (0.38–0.64) | MH* | 0.07 (−0.11–0.24) |
Movement Quality | RP** | 0.48 (0.33–0.60) | SF* | 0.07 (−0.11–0.24) |
Walking | PF** | 0.48 (0.33–0.60) | SF* | 0.22 (0.05–0.38) |
Stairs | PF** | 0.53 (0.39–0.64) | SF* | 0.09 (−0.09–0.26) |
Stability | BP** | 0.44 (0.29–0.57) | SF* | 0.14 (−0.04–0.31) |
Pain | BP** | 0.54 (0.40–0.65) | VT | −0.03 (−0.21– −0.14) |
Pain | RE | 0.11 (−0.07–0.28) | ||
Pain | SF* | 0.11 (−0.07–0.28) | ||
Technique | PCS** | 0.58 (0.55–0.68) | MCS | −0.24 (−0.40– −0.07) |
Plié | PF** | 0.50 (0.36–0.62) | SF | 0.09 (−0.09–0.26) |
Developpé | PF** | 0.47 (0.32–0.60) | SF* | 0.04 (−0.14–0.21) |
Relevé Balance | PF** | 0.38 (0.22–0.52) | SF | −0.01 (−0.19–0.16) |
Rond de Jambe | PF | 0.20 (0.03–0.36) | SF | −0.03 (−0.20–0.15) |
Kneeling | PF** | 0.48 (0.33–0.60) | SF | 0.08 (−0.10–0.25) |
Turning | PF** | 0.31 (0.14–0.46) | SF* | 0.04 (−0.14–0.21) |
Jumping | PF** | 0.45 (0.30–0.58) | SF* | 0.19 (0.01–0.35) |
Grand Allegro | PF** | 0.45 (0.30–0.58) | SF | 0.04 (−0.14–0.21) |
Item Content | Factor 1 |
---|---|
Overall Activity | 0.62 |
Movement Quality | 0.82 |
Walking | 0.77 |
Stairs | 0.79 |
Stability/Symptoms | 0.77 |
Pain | 0.76 |
Plié | 0.81 |
Developpé | 0.74 |
Relevé Balance | 0.83 |
Rond de Jambe | 0.75 |
Kneeling | 0.50 |
Turning | 0.85 |
Jumping | 0.79 |
Grand Allegro | 0.79 |
Time | DFOS-Sp ADL | DFOS-Sp Technique | DFOS-Sp Total | PCS | MCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intake Time | |||||
Score (Mean ±SD) | 32.24 ± 4.76 | 42.47 ± 7.06 | 74.71 ± 10.48 | 44.81 ± 9.65 | 41.99 ± 9.57 |
SEM | 0.67 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.37 | 1.35 |
MDC95 | 1.86 | 2.77 | 2.91 | 3.78 | 3.75 |
Discharged | |||||
Score (Mean ±SD) | 35.43 ± 4.46 | 46.65 ± 3.06 | 82.08 ± 6.21 | 51.16 ± 6.57 | 42.46 ± 6.72 |
SEM | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
MDC95 | 1.75 | 1.20 | 1.72 | 2.58 | 2.64 |
Δ (Injured minus Discharged) | 3.20 | 4.18 | 7.37 | 6.35 | 0.47 |
SRM | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 1.37 | 0.12 |
ES | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.05 |
3-months | |||||
Score (Mean ±SD) | 38.84 ± 1.35 | 47.98 ± 2.92 | 86.82 ± 3.62 | 58.83 ± 3.39 | 41.04 ± 4.96 |
SEM | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.70 |
MDC95 | 0.53 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.94 |
Δ (Discharged minus 3-months) | 4.23 | 3.61 | 5.89 | 7.67 | 1.42 |
SRM | 0.81 | 0.37 | 0.81 | 1.67 | 0.50 |
ES | 1.39 | 0.78 | 1.16 | 1.45 | 0.10 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
de-la-Cruz-Torres, B.; Barrera-García-Martín, I.; Romero-Morales, C.; Bronner, S. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) for Spanish Dancers. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030169
de-la-Cruz-Torres B, Barrera-García-Martín I, Romero-Morales C, Bronner S. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) for Spanish Dancers. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(3):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030169
Chicago/Turabian Stylede-la-Cruz-Torres, Blanca, Irene Barrera-García-Martín, Carlos Romero-Morales, and Shaw Bronner. 2020. "Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) for Spanish Dancers" Diagnostics 10, no. 3: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030169