Next Article in Journal
Validation of PfSNP-LAMP-Lateral Flow Dipstick for Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Associated with Pyrimethamine Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes in Functional Outcome at Discharge from an Intensive Rehabilitation Hospital
Previous Article in Journal
Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/diagnostics10110947
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MPG and NPRL3 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Ischemic Stroke Susceptibility and Post-Stroke Mortality

by
Chang Soo Ryu
1,
Jinkun Bae
2,
In Jai Kim
3,
Jinkwon Kim
4,
Seung Hun Oh
4,
Ok Joon Kim
4,* and
Nam Keun Kim
1,*
1
Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, School of Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea
3
Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, School of Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea
4
Department of Neurology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, School of Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2020, 10(11), 947; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110947
Submission received: 19 September 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 12 November 2020 / Published: 13 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ischemic stroke is a complicated disease which is affected by environmental factors and genetic factors. In this field, various studies using whole-exome sequencing (WES) have focused on novel and linkage variants in diverse diseases. Thus, we have investigated the various novel variants, which focused on their linkages to each other, in ischemic stroke. Specifically, we analyzed the N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase (MPG) gene, which plays an initiating role in DNA repair, and the nitrogen permease regulator-like 3 (NPRL3) gene, which is involved in regulating the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. We took blood samples of 519 ischemic stroke patients and 417 controls. Genetic polymorphisms were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. We found that two NPRL3 polymorphisms (rs2541618 C>T and rs75187722 G>A), as well as the MPG rs2562162 C>T polymorphism, were significantly associated with ischemic stroke. In Cox proportional hazard regression models, the MPG rs2562162 was associated with the survival of small-vessel disease patients in ischemic stroke. Our study showed that NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms are associated with ischemic stroke prevalence and ischemic stroke survival. Taken together, these findings suggest that NPRL3 and MPG genotypes may be useful clinical biomarkers for ischemic stroke development and prognosis.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the advancement of whole-exome sequencing (WES) has allowed for enhanced screening of genetic diseases [1] and has become a useful tool for studying various diseases [2]. Specifically, the use of WES has resulted in large cohorts of subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders, from which numerous gene mutations have been identified, as well as the confirmation of a role for the identified variants in related pathways of more complex diseases [3,4]. Using this approach, many genes underlying monogenic disorders have now been established; however, the identification of genes involved in multi-genic diseases is more complicated [5]. Furthermore, various studies using WES have identified and focused on the novel, linkage, and haplotype variants in diverse diseases [6,7,8,9,10]. Thus, we have investigated the various novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms, which focused adjacent to one another, in ischemic stroke.
Ischemic stroke is a multifactorial disease that is affected by both genetic [11,12] and environmental factors [13], including advanced age [14], diabetes mellitus [15], family or personal history of stroke [16], high cholesterol [17], smoking [18], hypertension [19], hyperlipidemia [20], and metabolic syndrome [21]. Of these, the primary contributors to ischemic stroke are diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, and hyperlipidemia [22]. Ischemic strokes occur when an artery supplying blood to the brain becomes blocked. This occlusion is often the result of thrombosis, which is responsible for 53% of ischemic strokes, or an embolism, which is responsible for 31% of ischemic strokes [23].
Platelets are a component of the blood responsible for clotting and are directly involved in both thrombus composition and thrombosis [24]. Importantly, many studies have demonstrated a clear association between platelet levels and ischemic stroke [25]. Platelets are formed within the cytoplasm of large precursor cells called megakaryocytes, which reside in the bone marrow [26]. The proliferation of megakaryocyte progenitors is regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which plays an important role in megakaryocyte terminal differentiation, including platelet functions [27]. In the brain, the mTOR pathway regulates numerous processes, including the development of nerve cells and their plasticity over time [28]. Additionally, increased mTOR activity has been shown to facilitate brain recovery after stroke [29].
DNA repair mechanisms also play an important role in the mammalian brain, and polymorphisms of DNA repair-related genes are associated with ischemic stroke susceptibility and short-term recovery [30,31]. In addition, preservation of normal brain function after endogenous damage and protection from brain-related diseases are associated with successful DNA repair, such as base-excision repair [32]. DNA glycosylases are enzymes involved in base-excision repair and are found in many species, including bacteria, yeast, plants, rodents, and humans. As such, there exist multiple subfamilies of these enzymes, including the human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase [33]. Notably, this subfamily of monofunctional glycosylases is involved in the recognition of base lesions, including alterations in purines, and in the initiation of the base-excision repair pathway [34]. Together, these findings support our efforts to assess whether mTOR pathway-related and DNA repair-related genes are associated with ischemic stroke prevalence.
Therefore, in this study, we investigated gene polymorphisms associated with ischemic stroke using WES. Specifically, we investigated the MPG gene, which encodes for N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase [35], and the NPRL3 gene, which encodes for nitrogen permease regulator-like 3, a component of the GATOR1 complex (Figure S1). Importantly, the GATOR1 complex is a regulator of the mTOR pathway [36], and its actions can be blocked by inhibiting mTOR complex 1 activity [37]. As a result of our WES screening, we discovered novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms for NPRL3 (rs2541618 C>T, rs75187722 G>A) and MPG (rs2562162 C>T, rs710079 C>T) that were adjacent to one another in chromosome 16. Thus, we designed a case-control study to investigate the association between the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms and ischemic stroke in a Korean population. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first piece of evidence of a role for NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms in ischemic stroke risk in Korean individuals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

Blood samples were collected from 519 ischemic stroke patients and 417 controls. All study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of CHA Bundang Medical Center and followed the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki (IRB No. 2013-09-073, date of approval: 6 November 2013). All patients and controls were recruited from the Department of Neurology of CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University between 2000 and 2008. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of CHA Bundang Medical Center in June 2000 (IRB No. 2013-09-073, date of approval: 6 November 2013) and both informed and written consent was obtained from study participants.
Ischemic stroke was defined as a stroke (a clinical syndrome characterized by rapidly developing clinical symptoms and signs of the focal or global loss of brain function) with evidence of cerebral infarction in clinically relevant areas of the brain according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan findings. On the basis of the clinical symptoms and neuroimaging data, two neurologists categorized whole ischemic strokes into four causative subtypes using the criteria of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) [38] as follows: (1) large-artery disease (LAD) defined by an infarction lesion of ≥15 mm in diameter by MRI and significant (>50%) stenosis of the main brain artery or cerebral cortex artery by cerebral angiography, (2) small-vessel disease (SVD) defined by an infarction lesion of <15 and ≥5 mm in diameter by MRI and classic lacunar syndrome without evidence of cerebral cortical dysfunction or detectable cardiac embolism, (3) cardioembolism (CE) defined by arterial occlusions and due to an embolus arising in the heart, as detected by cardiac evaluation, and (4) pathogenesis in which the cause of the stroke was not determined or had more than two causes.
Based on these criteria, 39.9% (n = 207) of patients in the stroke group had LAD, 28.7% (n = 149) had SVD, 10.2% (n = 53) experienced a CE, and 21.2% (n = 110) were of an undetermined pathogenesis. In addition, we selected 417 controls that were matched for sex ratio and age within 5 years in accordance with the patient group. Controls were drawn from subjects visiting our hospitals during the same period for health examinations, including biochemical testing, electrocardiograms, and brain MRIs.
Hypertension was defined as a systolic pressure of >140 mmHg and a diastolic pressure of >90 mmHg on more than one occasion and included patients currently taking hypertensive medications. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting plasma glucose levels of >126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) and included patients currently taking diabetic medications. Smoking referred to patients that were current smokers. Hyperlipidemia was defined as a high fasting serum total cholesterol level (≥240 mg/dL) or a history of taking an antihyperlipidemic agent treatment. Patients that possessed more than three of the following five risk factors were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome (MetS): body mass index (BMI) of ≥25.0 kg/m2; triglycerides of ≥150 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) of ≤40 mg/dL in men or ≤50 mg/dL in women; blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or patients currently taking hypertensive medication; and fasting plasma glucose of ≥110 mg/dL or patients currently taking insulin or hypoglycemic medication.

2.2. Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Analysis

The NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms were selected using WES screening because our purpose was to investigate the various novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which focused adjacent to one another, in ischemic stroke. After the gene selection progressing, we progressed the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) because we needed to confirm that the WES data were correct. The significant SNP list was filtered by the significant criteria satisfying P-value < 0.05 for Fisher’s exact test, and these significant SNPs were shown through a Manhattan plot (Figure S2). Ten variants were selected by Fisher’s exact test (P = upper 0.2%), and we chose four sites in two genes, which were adjacent to one another, that contained a polymorphic genotype as well as one previously reported site (Table S2, Figure S2). Paired-end sequences produced by a HiSeq Instrument were first mapped on the human genome using the mapping program “BWA” (version 0.7.12). Based on the output BAM file, variant genotyping of each sample was performed with the Haplotype Caller of GATK. Then, an in-house program and SnpEff were applied to filter additional databases including ESP6500, ClinVar, and dbNSFP2.9. For the advanced analysis, we gathered all the per-sample genomic variant call formats (GVCFs) and passed them together to the joint genotyping tool and genotype GVCFs. We calculated genotype frequencies of each individual polymorphism and evaluated the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) to check the data quality and genotype error.
The association between the case-control status and each individual single-nucleotide polymorphism was analyzed by Fisher’s exact test, which assumed that a rare allele variant had an effect for each polymorphism. Gene enrichment and functional annotation analysis for significant SNPs were performed based on the Gene Ontology database (Gene Ontology unifying biology, available online: https://geneontology.org, accessed on 13 November 2020). The statistical analysis for association test was conducted using PLINK 1.07 (massgeneralbrigham, available online: https://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/, accessed on 13 November 2020).

2.3. Genotyping

Genomic DNA from the stroke patients and controls was extracted in blood leukocytes using a G-DEX(TM) on blood extraction kit (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam, South Korea). Most of the genetic polymorphisms were confirmed by PCR and RFLP. One genetic polymorphism was detected by real-time PCR. The NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T, NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A, and MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms were confirmed by restriction enzyme activation of Sau96I, HphI, and BccI (New England Bio Laboratories, Ipswich, MA, USA) at 37 °C over a period of 16–24 hrs (Table S1). Each polymorphism genotype was confirmed by electrophoretic separation on 4% agarose gels. In addition, for each polymorphism, 30% of the PCR data were randomly selected for a second PCR assay and were checked using DNA sequencing to validate real-time PCR and RFLP findings.

2.4. Post-Stroke Mortality

To estimate the association between NPRL3, MPG gene polymorphisms, and long-term prognosis after ischemic stroke, the time from stroke occurrence to death was recorded. The death dates of each stroke patient (n = 519) were confirmed using death certificates obtained from the Korean National Statistical Office. The survival statistics were derived from the survival data from 2008 to 2013, and patients who were alive on 31 December 2013 were censored.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Differences in the frequencies of the identified polymorphisms between stroke patients and control subjects were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized to measure the association between genotype frequencies and stroke. To evaluate the relationship between each specific polymorphism, as well as a combination of the allele, the OR and 95% CI were used. The relationships between polymorphisms and stroke prevalence were calculated using adjusted ORs (AORs) and 95% CIs in logistic regression with adjusted factors such as sex, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. Statistical significance was accepted at a degree of P < 0.05. The false discovery rate (FDR) correction was performed to adjust multiple comparisons. All of the polymorphisms were consistent with the HWE (P > 0.05). To estimate ischemic stroke risk, we used three genetic susceptibility models: additive, dominant, and recessive. All NPRL3 and MPG genotypes were converted into numeric values for logistic regression in accordance with their genotypes. Wild homozygotes were designated as “0” in all models. Heterozygotes were designated as “1” in additive and dominant models and “0” in the recessive model. Mutant homozygotes were designated as “1” in dominant and recessive models and “2” in the additive model.
The haplotypes of whole polymorphisms were confirmed using multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) to identify combinations with strong synergistic effects. Furthermore, the HAPSTAT program (version 3.0; www.bios.unc.edu/~lin/hapstat/; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) was used to estimate the frequency of all haplotypes and confirmed the combinations with strong synergistic effects. Furthermore, the statistical power of positive associations was calculated using G*POWER 3.0 (Universität Düsseldorf: gpower, available online: http://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.html, accessed on 13 November 2020). Survival curves were created from the Cox proportional hazards regression, and the log-rank test was used to estimate the importance of differences between groups. Cox regression models were used to analyze the independent prognostic importance markers, and results were adjusted for various factors, including sex, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

The demographic characteristics and clinical factors of the ischemic stroke patients and controls are shown in Table 1 and Table S3. The controls and ischemic stroke patients consisted of 41.5% and 44.1% males, respectively, and the mean ages of the control and stroke groups were 63.05 ± 11.00 and 63.29 ± 11.95 years, respectively. Some significant differences in clinical variables were confirmed between ischemic stroke patients and controls. Metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were more incident in stroke patients, LAD patients, and SVD patients than controls. In addition, HDL-c was lower in stroke patients and LAD patients than controls, and folate was lower in stroke patients, LAD patients, and SVD patients than controls. Furthermore, homocysteine was higher in stroke patients and LAD patients than controls. The vitamin B12, total cholesterol, and triglyceride had significant differences between CE patients and controls.

3.2. Comparison of the Frequencies of NPRL3 and MPG Polymorphisms between Patients with Ischemic Stroke, Subtypes, and Controls

We investigated the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T, NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A, MPG rs2562162 C>T, and MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms in patients with ischemic stroke and controls, as well as by stoke subtype (LAD, SVD, and CE). The data are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. We calculated the AOR using logistic regression analyses including adjusted factors such as age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and hyperlipidemia. The frequencies of the identified NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms agreed with the predictions of the HWE (P > 0.05).
We found numerous differences in the included polymorphisms between the ischemic stroke patients and control groups. For example, our results showed that the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T polymorphism was associated with the prevalence of ischemic stroke: the NPRL3 rs2541618 TT genotype and the dominant model (CC vs. CT+TT) were both associated with ischemic stroke prevalence. Similarly, the NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A polymorphism was associated with ischemic stroke prevalence, and the NPRL3 rs75187722 GA genotype and the dominant model (GG vs. GA+AA) were also significantly associated with ischemic stroke prevalence. However, no polymorphisms were associated with ischemic stroke prevalence after the FDR analysis.
In our ischemic stroke subgroup analysis, we found several associations between the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms and stroke subtype. SVD was significantly associated with the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T polymorphism (TT and additive model: CC vs. CT vs. TT; dominant model: CC vs. CT+TT; recessive model: CC+CT vs. TT), the NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A polymorphism (GA and additive model: GG vs. GA vs. AA; dominant model: GG vs. GA+AA), and the MPG rs2562162 C>T polymorphism (CT and additive model: CC vs. CT vs. TT; dominant model: CC vs. CT+TT). The NPRL3 gene polymorphisms and MPG gene polymorphisms were further assessed using the FDR analysis. Notably, only the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T (TT genotype and additive model), the rs75187722 G>A (additive model and dominant model), and the MPG rs2562162 C>T (additive model and dominant model) were significantly associated with SVD after FDR analysis. Additionally, NPRL3 and MPG gene polymorphisms were not significantly associated with LAD or CE stroke patients after FDR analysis. The statistical powers of positive associations measured in this study are shown in Table S9.

3.3. Haplotype Analyses of NPRL3 and MPG Polymorphisms between Ischemic Stroke Patients and Controls

We next proceeded to perform haplotype analyses comparing the ischemic stroke patients and controls (Table 4). The following showed significant associations with stroke prevalence (P < 0.05): the T-A-C allele combination of the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs2562162 C>T polymorphisms, the C-A-C allele combination of the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms, and the T-A-C allele combination of the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms. In addition, although it was not significant, the T-A allele combination of the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/rs75187722 G>A polymorphisms showed a trend toward increasing ischemic stroke prevalence. Each polymorphism was also evaluated with FDR analysis. Only the C-A-C allele combination of the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms and the T-A-C allele combination of the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms were significantly associated with stroke prevalence after FDR analysis.

3.4. Combined Effects of NPRL3 and MPG Polymorphisms and Clinical Factors

To determine if other factors contributed to the association of genotype and ischemic stroke, we stratified our genotype analyses by clinical variables (Tables S4 and S5). Moreover, we clarified the number of each subgroup in stratification analysis. These stratified analyses revealed many combined effects of genotype and ischemic stroke risk factors. Therefore, we next performed an analysis of interactions between the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms and environmental factors (Table 5, Table S6). Moreover, we clarified the number of each subgroup in interaction analysis. We found that the NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT genotype had synergistic effects with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking (Table 5). Especially, NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT with hypertension (AOR, 3.120; 95% CI, 2.116–4.599) was shown to significantly increase ischemic stroke prevalence. In addition, NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT with diabetes mellitus (AOR, 2.904; 95% CI, 1.758–4.796) was shown to significantly increase ischemic stroke prevalence. Furthermore, NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT had a combinatorial effect with HDL-c<40(M)/50(F) (AOR, 6.364; 95% CI, 4.103–9.869) and NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT was shown to possess a combinatorial effect with folate ≤3.54 nmol/L (AOR, 4.866; 95% CI, 2.527–9.370 (Table S6). Similarly, we found synergistic effects between this polymorphism and several clinical factors (hyperlipidemia, smoking, high homocysteine levels, and low prothrombin time levels) (Table 5 and Table S6). Furthermore, we found that the NPRL3 rs75187722 GA+AA genotype had synergistic effects with low HDL-c levels and high platelet levels (Table S6).
Similarly, the MPG rs2562162 CT+TT genotype exhibited synergistic effects with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking (Table 5). Especially, MPG rs2562162 CT+TT with hypertension (AOR, 3.256; 95% CI, 2.193–4.833) was shown to significantly increase ischemic stroke prevalence. Moreover, MPG rs2562162 CT+TT with diabetes mellitus (AOR, 2.984; 95% CI, 1.759–5.063) was shown to significantly increase ischemic stroke prevalence. Furthermore, MPG rs2562162 CT+TT had a combinatorial effect with HDL-c<40(M)/50(F) (AOR, 7.330; 95% CI, 4.564–11.773) and MPG rs2562162 CT+TT was shown to possess a combinatorial effect with folate ≤ 3.54 nmol/L (AOR, 5.601; 95% CI, 2.651–11.836) (Table S6). In addition, the MPG rs2562162 CT+TT genotype exhibited synergistic effects with several clinical factors (hyperlipidemia, smoking, and low prothrombin time levels) (Table 5 and Table S6). Moreover, the MPG rs710079 CT+TT genotype had synergistic effects with low HDL-c levels and low folate levels (Table S6).

3.5. Analysis of NPRL3 and MPG Polymorphisms with Respect to Survival in Ischemic Stroke Patients and Subtypes

Our final analysis investigated the relationships between the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms and survival in ischemic stroke patients (Figure 1, Figure S3). To this end, we performed a Cox proportional analysis, which showed that the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T, NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A, MPG rs2562162 C>T, and MPG rs710079 C>T polymorphisms were not associated with survival in ischemic stroke patients. However, the MPG rs2562162 CT genotype and dominant model were associated with survival of SVD patients in the Cox proportional hazard regression models (CC vs. CT and CC vs. CT+TT analyses; Figure 1A, Figure S3A). Conversely, the MPG rs2562162 CT genotype was not associated with survival in LAD or CE patients in our analyses (Figure S3B,C).
In addition, we found a significant association between the MPG rs2562162 C>T dominant model and SVD patients with hypertension using the Cox proportional hazard regression model (CC vs. CT+TT; Figure 1B). Similarly, the MPG rs710079 CT genotype was associated with survival in stroke patients with diabetes mellitus using the Cox proportional hazard regression model (CC vs. CT; Figure 1C), and the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T dominant model was associated with survival in stroke patients with hyperlipidemia (CC vs. CT+TT; Figure 1D). Finally, we performed a stepwise Cox regression analysis to confirm the covariant effects. As a result, we found that the MPG rs2562162 (in SVD patients), MPG rs710079 (with diabetes mellitus), and NPRL3 rs2541618 (with hyperlipidemia) polymorphisms and age were associated with mortality in stroke patients (Table S8).

3.6. Clinical Factors in Ischemic Stroke Patients, Subtypes Stratified by NPRL3 and MPG Polymorphisms

Using an analysis of variance (ANOVA), we confirmed that the NPRL3 rs75187722 AA genotype was associated with increased uric acid levels compared to the uric acid levels with the NPRL3 rs75187722 GG genotype (GG vs. GA vs. AA; P = 0.028) in ischemic stroke patients. Furthermore, the MPG rs256262 CT+TT was associated with increased platelet levels compared to the platelet levels with the MPG rs256262 CC genotype (CC vs. CT+TT; P = 0.022) in ischemic stroke patients (Table S7).
Subsequently, we performed an ANOVA based on the individual ischemic stroke subgroups. We found that the NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT was associated with increased platelet levels compared to the platelet levels with the NPRL3 rs2541618 CC genotype in the LAD patients (CC vs. CT+TT; P = 0.030). Moreover, the NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT decreased HDL-c compared to HDL-c with the NPRL3 rs2541618CC genotype in the LAD patients (CC vs. CT+TT; P = 0.038) (Table S7). With respect to the SVD patients, the NPRL3 rs2541618 TT genotype increased fibrinogen levels compared to fibrinogen levels with NPRL3 rs2541618 CC+CT (CC+CT vs. TT; P = 0.034) (Table S7).

4. Discussion

In this study, we sought to determine novel markers with potential use in clinical diagnostics. To this end, we selected four polymorphisms (NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T, NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A, MPG rs2562162 C>T, and MPG rs710079 C>T) to investigate with respect to ischemic stroke in a Korean population.
NPRL3 is a known regulator of mTOR activity that promotes neuronal survival in stroke patients and is associated with focal epilepsy [39,40]. Importantly, increased mTOR activity accelerates brain recovery after stroke, and focal epilepsy is associated with the manifestation of ischemic cerebrovascular disease [29,41]. Consequently, the NPRL3 gene has been previously linked to ischemic stroke prevalence due to its relationship with cerebrovascular disease. Therefore, we hypothesized that NPRL3 polymorphisms affect ischemic stroke prevalence and prognosis. In agreement with our hypothesis, our analyses showed that the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T and NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A genotypes were significantly associated with the prevalence of ischemic stroke, and this association was strengthened when limited to ischemic stroke patients with SVD. Interestingly, the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T polymorphism was associated with decreased long-term survival after stroke in patients with hyperlipidemia. Although we did not identify the cause of the high mortality of stroke patients with the NPRL3 rs2541618 CT+TT dominant model, our analysis did show that the NPRL3 rs2541618 polymorphism was significantly associated with the rate of ischemic stroke patient survival. Furthermore, we confirmed that the NPRL3 rs2541618 and rs75187722 polymorphisms were significantly associated with fibrinogen and uric acid, which are risk factors of ischemic stroke [42,43].
Polymorphisms in MPG and other base-excision repair-related genes due to age-related or oxidative DNA damage are major contributors to stroke [44,45,46]. Furthermore, base-excision repair, which is initiated by the MPG gene, was reported to promote ischemia-reperfusion injury in the brain [47]. These ischemia-reperfusion injuries alter the blood flow restoration at the post-ischemic tissue and lead to further tissue damage [48]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the MPG gene is associated with ischemic stroke prevalence and prognosis. In our analyses, we found that the MPG rs2562162 C>T genotype was significantly associated with prevalence of the SVD subtype of ischemic stroke. Interestingly, the MPG rs2562162 C>T polymorphism was significantly associated with increased long-term survival of SVD patients with and without hypertension, whereas this same polymorphism was not associated with mortality in LAD or CE patients. Although we did not identify the cause of low mortality in SVD patients (with or without hypertension) with the MPG rs2562162 dominant model, our analysis did show that the MPG rs2562162 polymorphism was significantly associated with the rate of ischemic stroke patient survival. Furthermore, we confirmed that the MPG rs2562162 dominant model was significantly associated with risk factors related to the SVD subtype of ischemic stroke, such as platelet levels [49].
This study has several limitations that must be considered when interpreting our results. First, it is not yet clear whether the gene polymorphisms predicted the phenotypes related to ischemic stroke prevalence. Second, we examined a limited pool of patients for our subgroup analyses. Third, the control group in our study was not completely healthy, as some required medical attention. Therefore, it is difficult to identify a casual effect for the clinical risk factors examined in these groups. Additional studies such as the replication study are needed to confirm that the NPRL3 and MPG genes play a crucial role in ischemic stroke pathogenesis and to provide more evidence that the regulation of NPRL3 and MPG expression or activation can be used as a tool to prevent ischemic stroke. Although expression of these genes has not been studied in ischemic stroke, the association between several risk factors of ischemic stroke, including inflammation activation and these gene polymorphisms, elicited speculation about the biomarker’s possible usefulness in early diagnosis [50,51,52,53]. We hypothesized that it could be affected by the decision of ischemic stroke diagnosis in the combined high-risk factor levels and these polymorphisms. Furthermore, the results of a previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) showed that NPRL3 rs2541618 and MPG rs2562162 were associated with SVD patients and controls in the European population (Table S10). Therefore, our findings suggest that these polymorphisms are potential biomarkers to diagnose ischemic stroke and assess risk.
Authors should discuss the results and how they can be interpreted from the perspective of previous studies and of the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T, NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A, and MPG rs2562162 C>T genotypes were all strongly associated with ischemic stroke prevalence. In a further analysis, we found that some of these genotypes were associated with different stroke subtypes; specifically, SVD was associated with NPRL3 rs2541618 TT genotype, NPRL3 rs75187722 GA genotype and the dominant model, and MPG rs2562162 CT genotypes and dominant model. Finally, we found that the dominant models of NPRL3 rs2541618, NPRL3 rs75187722, and MPG rs2562162 all showed synergistic effects with clinical risk factors of the SVD subtype and ischemic stroke, including platelet level, fibrinogen, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Taken together, these results suggest that NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms play a role in ischemic stroke. Consequently, we identified associations between the NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T, NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A, and MPG rs2562162 C>T polymorphisms with the prevalence of ischemic stroke in a Korean population as well as a significant association between NPRL3 and MPG gene polymorphisms and post-stroke mortality. However, the specific mechanisms underlying these effects need to be investigated in future research.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/11/947/s1, Figure S1: Information about MPG and NPRL3 gene polymorphism position numbers in chromosome 16, Figure S2: Information about MPG and NPRL3 gene polymorphism in Manhattan plot of WES analysis, Figure S3: Survival plot of a Cox proportional hazards model with MPG rs2562162 C>T in ischemic stroke, Table S1: Information about NPRL3, MPG polymorphisms for PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR analysis, Table S2: Information about NPRL3, MPG gene polymorphisms from WES results, Table S3: Comparison of baseline characteristics between ischemic stroke patients, ischemic stroke subgroups, and controls, Table S4: Stratified analysis of NPRL3 genotypes and characteristics of ischemic stroke among individual risk factors, Table S5: Stratified analysis of MPG genotypes and characteristics of ischemic stroke among individual risk factors, Table S6: Ischemic stroke incidence by interaction analysis between NPRL3, MPG genotypes and environmental factors, Table S7: Clinical variables of ischemic stroke patients and subtypes stratified according to NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms, Table S8: Results of stepwise Cox regression analysis for ischemic stroke survival, Table S9: Statistical power to detect various genetic associations in the present case-control study, Table S10: The results of meta-analysis restricted to Europeans in the MEGASTROKE GWAS loci of NPRL3 and MPG genes polymorphisms.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments, C.S.R., O.J.K. and N.K.K.; Collected the blood samples from ischemic stroke patients and control subjects, J.K., J.B., I.J.K., S.H.O. and O.J.K.; Performed the experiments, C.S.R.; Analyzed the data, C.S.R.; Contributed reagents-materials and analysis tools, C.S.R. and J.K.; Wrote the paper, C.S.R.; Article editing, O.J.K. and N.K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grants funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03930141) and by the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI18C19990200).

Acknowledgments

The MEGASTROKE project received funding from sources specified at http://www.megastroke.org/acknowledgements.html (megastroke, available online: http://www.megastroke.org, accessed on 13 November 2020). MEGASTROKE CONSORTIUM authors are listed in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviation

MPG: N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase; NPRL3: nitrogen permease regulator-like 3; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; RFLP: restriction fragment length polymorphism; WES: whole-exome sequencing; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; LAD: large-artery disease; SVD: small-vessel disease; CE: cardioembolism; MetS: metabolic syndrome; BMI: body mass index; HDL-c: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; GVCFs: genomic variant call formats; HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; AORs: adjusted ORs; FDR: false discovery rate; MDR: multifactor dimensionality reduction; GWAS: genome-wide association study; HR: hazard ratio.

References

  1. Jiang, T.; Tan, M.S.; Tan, L.; Yu, J.T. Application of next-generation sequencing technologies in Neurology. Ann. Transl. Med. 2014, 2, 125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Fu, W.; O’Connor, T.D.; Jun, G.; Kang, H.M.; Abecasis, G.; Leal, S.M.; Gabriel, S.; Rieder, M.J.; Altshuler, D.; Shendure, J.; et al. Analysis of 6515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature 2013, 493, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ahn, Y.J.; Markkandan, K.; Baek, I.P.; Mun, S.; Lee, W.; Kim, H.S.; Han, K. An efficient and tunable parameter to improve variant calling for whole genome and exome sequencing data. Genes Genom. 2018, 40, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mustafa, S.; Akhtar, Z.; Latif, M.; Hassan, M.; Faisal, M.; Iqbal, F. A novel nonsense mutation in NPR2 gene causing Acromesomelic dysplasia, type Maroteaux in a consanguineous family in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Genes Genom. 2020, 42, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rabbani, B.; Tekin, M.; Mahdieh, N. The promise of whole-exome sequencing in medical genetics. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 59, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Leung, G.K.C.; Mak, C.C.Y.; Fung, J.L.F.; Wong, W.H.S.; Tsang, M.H.Y.; Yu, M.H.C.; Pei, S.L.C.; Yeung, K.S.; Mok, G.T.K.; Lee, C.P.; et al. Identifying the genetic causes for prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies (SCAs) by whole-exome sequencing (WES). BMC Med. Genom. 2018, 11, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zheng, G.X.; Lau, B.T.; Schnall-Levin, M.; Jarosz, M.; Bell, J.M.; Hindson, C.M.; Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, S.; Masquelier, D.A.; Merrill, L.; Terry, J.M.; et al. Haplotyping germline and cancer genomes with high-throughput linked-read sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rimmer, A.; Phan, H.; Mathieson, I.; Iqbal, Z.; Twigg, S.R.F.; Consortium, W.G.S.; Wilkie, A.O.M.; McVean, G.; Lunter, G. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bis, J.C.; Jian, X.; Kunkle, B.W.; Chen, Y.; Hamilton-Nelson, K.L.; Bush, W.S.; Salerno, W.J.; Lancour, D.; Ma, Y.; Renton, A.E.; et al. Whole exome sequencing study identifies novel rare and common Alzheimer’s-Associated variants involved in immune response and transcriptional regulation. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 25, 1859–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jia, X.; Zhang, F.; Bai, J.; Gao, L.; Zhang, X.; Sun, H.; Sun, D.; Guan, R.; Sun, W.; Xu, L.; et al. Combinational analysis of linkage and exome sequencing identifies the causative mutation in a Chinese family with congenital cataract. BMC Med. Genet. 2013, 14, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Scherrer, N.; Fays, F.; Mueller, B.; Luft, A.; Fluri, F.; Christ-Crain, M.; Devaux, Y.; Katan, M. MicroRNA 150-5p Improves Risk Classification for Mortality within 90 Days after Acute Ischemic Stroke. J. Stroke 2017, 19, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kim, J.O.; Bae, J.; Kim, J.; Oh, S.H.; An, H.J.; Han, I.B.; Oh, D.; Kim, O.J.; Kim, N.K. Association of MicroRNA Biogenesis Genes Polymorphisms with Ischemic Stroke Susceptibility and Post-Stroke Mortality. J. Stroke 2018, 20, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Venketasubramanian, N.; Yoon, B.W.; Pandian, J.; Navarro, J.C. Stroke Epidemiology in South, East, and South-East Asia: A Review. J. Stroke 2017, 19, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mustacchi, P. Risk factors in stroke. West. J. Med. 1985, 143, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Kannel, W.B.; McGee, D.L. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA 1979, 241, 2035–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kulshreshtha, A.; Vaccarino, V.; Goyal, A.; McClellan, W.; Nahab, F.; Howard, V.J.; Judd, S.E. Family history of stroke and cardiovascular health in a national cohort. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. Off. J. Natl. Stroke Assoc. 2015, 24, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Cui, R.; Iso, H.; Yamagishi, K.; Saito, I.; Kokubo, Y.; Inoue, M.; Tsugane, S.; Group, J.S. High serum total cholesterol levels is a risk factor of ischemic stroke for general Japanese population: The JPHC study. Atherosclerosis 2012, 221, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Albertsen, I.E.; Overvad, T.F.; Lip, G.Y.; Larsen, T.B. Smoking, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic stroke: A confluence of epidemics. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2015, 30, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shekelle, R.B.; Ostfeld, A.M.; Klawans, H.L., Jr. Hypertension and risk of stroke in an elderly population. Stroke 1974, 5, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jimenez-Conde, J.; Biffi, A.; Rahman, R.; Kanakis, A.; Butler, C.; Sonni, S.; Massasa, E.; Cloonan, L.; Gilson, A.; Capozzo, K.; et al. Hyperlipidemia and reduced white matter hyperintensity volume in patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke 2010, 41, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kurl, S.; Laukkanen, J.A.; Niskanen, L.; Laaksonen, D.; Sivenius, J.; Nyyssonen, K.; Salonen, J.T. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of stroke in middle-aged men. Stroke 2006, 37, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Mouradian, M.S.; Majumdar, S.R.; Senthilselvan, A.; Khan, K.; Shuaib, A. How well are hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking managed after a stroke or transient ischemic attack? Stroke 2002, 33, 1656–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mohr, J.P.; Caplan, L.R.; Melski, J.W.; Goldstein, R.J.; Duncan, G.W.; Kistler, J.P.; Pessin, M.S.; Bleich, H.L. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: A prospective registry. Neurology 1978, 28, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Stegner, D.; Nieswandt, B. Platelet receptor signaling in thrombus formation. J. Mol. Med. 2011, 89, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shah, A.B.; Beamer, N.; Coull, B.M. Enhanced in vivo platelet activation in subtypes of ischemic stroke. Stroke 1985, 16, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nurden, P.; Poujol, C.; Nurden, A.T. The evolution of megakaryocytes to platelets. Baillieres Clin. Haematol. 1997, 10, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raslova, H.; Baccini, V.; Loussaief, L.; Comba, B.; Larghero, J.; Debili, N.; Vainchenker, W. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates both proliferation of megakaryocyte progenitors and late stages of megakaryocyte differentiation. Blood 2006, 107, 2303–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maiese, K. Cutting through the complexities of mTOR for the treatment of stroke. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2014, 11, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Xie, R.; Wang, P.; Ji, X.; Zhao, H. Ischemic post-conditioning facilitates brain recovery after stroke by promoting Akt/mTOR activity in nude rats. J. Neurochem. 2013, 127, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sykora, P.; Wilson, D.M., 3rd; Bohr, V.A. Base excision repair in the mammalian brain: Implication for age related neurodegeneration. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2013, 134, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. He, W.; Huang, P.; Liu, D.; Zhong, L.; Yu, R.; Li, J. Polymorphism of the XRCC1 Gene Is Associated with Susceptibility and Short-Term Recovery of Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Canugovi, C.; Misiak, M.; Ferrarelli, L.K.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. The role of DNA repair in brain related disease pathology. DNA Repair 2013, 12, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Abner, C.W.; Lau, A.Y.; Ellenberger, T.; Bloom, L.B. Base excision and DNA binding activities of human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase are sensitive to the base paired with a lesion. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 13379–13387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hedglin, M.; O’Brien, P.J. Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase employs a processive search for DNA damage. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 11434–11445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Adhikari, S.; Chetram, M.A.; Woodrick, J.; Mitra, P.S.; Manthena, P.V.; Khatkar, P.; Dakshanamurthy, S.; Dixon, M.; Karmahapatra, S.K.; Nuthalapati, N.K.; et al. Germ line variants of human N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase show impaired DNA repair activity and facilitate 1,N6-ethenoadenine-induced mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 4966–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nandagopal, N.; Roux, P.P. Regulation of global and specific mRNA translation by the mTOR signaling pathway. Translation 2015, 3, e983402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bar-Peled, L.; Chantranupong, L.; Cherniack, A.D.; Chen, W.W.; Ottina, K.A.; Grabiner, B.C.; Spear, E.D.; Carter, S.L.; Meyerson, M.; Sabatini, D.M. A tumor suppressor complex with GAP activity for the Rag GTPases that signal amino acid sufficiency to mTORC1. Science 2013, 340, 1100–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Adams, H.P. Jr.; Biller, J. Classification of subtypes of ischemic stroke: History of the trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment classification. Stroke 2015, 46, e114–e117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ricos, M.G.; Hodgson, B.L.; Pippucci, T.; Saidin, A.; Ong, Y.S.; Heron, S.E.; Licchetta, L.; Bisulli, F.; Bayly, M.A.; Hughes, J.; et al. Mutations in the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway regulators NPRL2 and NPRL3 cause focal epilepsy. Ann. Neurol. 2016, 79, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weiner, G.M.; Ducruet, A.F. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity promotes neuronal survival in stroke with or without ischemic postconditioning. Neurosurgery 2015, 76, N19–N20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cocito, L.; Loeb, C. Focal epilepsy as a possible sign of transient subclinical ischemia. Eur. Neurol. 1989, 29, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Swarowska, M.; Janowska, A.; Polczak, A.; Klimkowicz-Mrowiec, A.; Pera, J.; Slowik, A.; Dziedzic, T. The sustained increase of plasma fibrinogen during ischemic stroke predicts worse outcome independently of baseline fibrinogen level. Inflammation 2014, 37, 1142–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Storhaug, H.M.; Norvik, J.V.; Toft, I.; Eriksen, B.O.; Lochen, M.L.; Zykova, S.; Solbu, M.; White, S.; Chadban, S.; Jenssen, T. Uric acid is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality in the general population: A gender specific analysis from The Tromso Study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2013, 13, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Orhan, G.; Elkama, A.; Mungan, S.O.; Eruyar, E.; Karahalil, B. The impact of detoxifying and repair gene polymorphisms on oxidative stress in ischemic stroke. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 37, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mahabir, S.; Abnet, C.C.; Qiao, Y.L.; Ratnasinghe, L.D.; Dawsey, S.M.; Dong, Z.W.; Taylor, P.R.; Mark, S.D. A prospective study of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XRCC1, XPD23 and APE/ref-1 and risk of stroke in Linxian, China. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007, 61, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Li, P.; Hu, X.; Gan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liang, W.; Chen, J. Mechanistic insight into DNA damage and repair in ischemic stroke: Exploiting the base excision repair pathway as a model of neuroprotection. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 1905–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ebrahimkhani, M.R.; Daneshmand, A.; Mazumder, A.; Allocca, M.; Calvo, J.A.; Abolhassani, N.; Jhun, I.; Muthupalani, S.; Ayata, C.; Samson, L.D. Aag-initiated base excision repair promotes ischemia reperfusion injury in liver, brain, and kidney. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4878–E4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cho, A.H.; Suh, D.C.; Kim, G.E.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, D.H.; Kwon, S.U.; Park, S.M.; Kang, D.W. MRI evidence of reperfusion injury associated with neurological deficits after carotid revascularization procedures. Eur. J. Neurol. 2009, 16, 1066–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oberheiden, T.; Blahak, C.; Nguyen, X.D.; Fatar, M.; Elmas, E.; Morper, N.; Dempfle, C.E.; Bazner, H.; Hennerici, M.; Borggrefe, M.; et al. Activation of platelets and cellular coagulation in cerebral small-vessel disease. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2010, 21, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pinto, A.; Tuttolomondo, A.; Di Raimondo, D.; Fernandez, P.; Licata, G. Risk factors profile and clinical outcome of ischemic stroke patients admitted in a Department of Internal Medicine and classified by TOAST classification. Int. Angiol. 2006, 25, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  51. Di Raimondo, D.; Tuttolomondo, A.; Buttà, C.; Casuccio, A.; Giarrusso, L.; Miceli, G.; Licata, G.; Pinto, A. Metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects of a home-based programme of aerobic physical exercise. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2013, 67, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Tuttolomondo, A.; Maida, C.; Pinto, A. Diabetic foot syndrome as a possible cardiovascular marker in diabetic patients. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 2015, 268390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tuttolomondo, A.; Maida, C.; Pinto, A. Diabetic foot syndrome: Immune-inflammatory features as possible cardiovascular markers in diabetes. World J. Orthop. 2015, 6, 62–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 10 00947 g001 550
Figure 1. Survival analysis of the small-vessel disease (SVD) in ischemic stroke using the Cox proportional hazards model, according to the MPG rs2562162 C>T, MPG rs710079 C>T, and NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T polymorphisms. Survival probability of ischemic stroke patients is shown based on (A) the MPG rs2562162 CC vs. CT+TT dominant model, (B) the MPG rs2562162 CC vs. CT+TT dominant model with hypertension, (C) the MPG rs2562162 CC vs. CT genotypes, and (D) the NPRL3 rs2541618 CC vs. CT+TT dominant model with hyperlipidemia. Note for Figure 1: HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 1. Survival analysis of the small-vessel disease (SVD) in ischemic stroke using the Cox proportional hazards model, according to the MPG rs2562162 C>T, MPG rs710079 C>T, and NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T polymorphisms. Survival probability of ischemic stroke patients is shown based on (A) the MPG rs2562162 CC vs. CT+TT dominant model, (B) the MPG rs2562162 CC vs. CT+TT dominant model with hypertension, (C) the MPG rs2562162 CC vs. CT genotypes, and (D) the NPRL3 rs2541618 CC vs. CT+TT dominant model with hyperlipidemia. Note for Figure 1: HR, hazard ratio.
Diagnostics 10 00947 g001
Table
Table 1. Comparison of baseline characteristics between ischemic stroke patients, ischemic stroke subgroups, and controls.
Table 1. Comparison of baseline characteristics between ischemic stroke patients, ischemic stroke subgroups, and controls.
CharacteristicsControls
(n = 417)		Stroke Patients
(n = 519)		PaLAD Patients
(n = 207)		PaSVD Patients
(n = 149)		PaCE Patients
(n = 53)		Pa
Males, n (%)173 (41.5)229 (44.1)0.60989 (43.0)0.81972 (48.3)0.36821 (39.6)0.866
Age,
(years, mean ± SD)		63.05 ± 11.0063.29 ± 11.950.74764.36 ± 11.810.17260.76 ± 11.630.03266.58 ± 12.550.031
Smoking,
n (%)		140 (33.6)194 (37.4)0.40577 (37.2)0.53554 (36.2)0.68216 (30.2)0.724
MetS,
n (%)		94 (22.5)238 (45.9)<0.0001112 (54.1)<0.000168 (45.6)0.000120 (37.7)0.070
HTN,
n (%)		171 (41.0)331 (63.8)0.0001131 (63.3)0.00392 (61.7)0.01130 (56.6)0.189
DM,
n (%)		56 (13.4)142 (27.4)<0.000155 (26.6)0.00147 (31.5)<0.000112 (22.6)0.132
Hyperlipidemia,
n (%)		95 (22.8)156 (30.1)0.05770 (33.8)0.02744 (29.5)0.20710 (18.9)0.603
SD, standard deviation; LAD, large artery disease; SVD, small-vessel disease; CE, cardioembolism; MetS, metabolic syndrome; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus. a P-values were calculated by two-sided t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. P-values < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphism frequencies between ischemic stroke patients and controls.
Table 2. Comparison of the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphism frequencies between ischemic stroke patients and controls.
GenotypesControls
(n = 417)		Stroke Patients
(n = 519)		AOR (95% CI) *P†P‡
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T
CC205 (49.2)225 (43.4)1.000 (reference)
CT178 (42.7)238 (45.9)1.270 (0.944–1.710)0.115 0.153
TT34 (8.2)56 (10.8)1.679 (1.011–2.787)0.0450.180
Additive (CC vs. CT vs. TT) 1.205 (0.979–1.485)0.0790.161
Dominant (CC vs. CT+TT) 1.333 (1.004–1.770)0.0470.094
Recessive (CC+CT vs. TT) 1.504 (0.924–2.449)0.101 0.366
HWE-P0.5910.555
NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A
GG333 (79.9)438 (84.4)1.000 (reference)
GA82 (19.7)77 (14.8)0.638 (0.438–0.931)0.0200.080
AA2 (0.5)4 (0.8)0.979 (0.172–5.586)0.981 0.981
Additive (GG vs. GA vs. AA) 0.742 (0.531–1.037)0.0810.161
Dominant (GG vs. GA+AA) 0.650 (0.448–0.942)0.0230.092
Recessive (GG+GA vs. AA) 1.060 (0.186–6.039)0.948 0.948
HWE-P0.1970.762
MPG rs2562162 C>T
CC239 (57.3)266 (51.3)1.000 (reference)
CT151 (36.2)217 (41.8)1.265 (0.950–1.684)0.107 0.153
TT27 (6.5)36 (6.9)1.213 (0.696–2.114)0.495 0.661
Additive (CC vs. CT vs. TT) 1.175 (0.944–1.463)0.1490.198
Dominant (CC vs. CT+TT) 1.252 (0.954–1.643)0.106 0.141
Recessive (CC+CT vs. TT) 1.105 (0.642–1.901)0.719 0.948
HWE-P0.6330.355
MPG rs710079 C>T
CC290 (69.5)376 (72.4)1.000 (reference)
CT118 (28.3)136 (26.2)0.962 (0.709–1.304)0.801 0.801
TT9 (2.2)7 (1.3)0.500 (0.174–1.436)0.198 0.396
Additive (CC vs. CT vs. TT) 0.893 (0.680–1.172)0.4130.413
Dominant (CC vs. CT+TT) 0.925 (0.686–1.246)0.606 0.606
Recessive (CC+CT vs. TT) 0.489 (0.170–1.401)0.183 0.366
HWE-P0.4540.173
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NPRL3, nitrogen permease receptor like-3; MPG, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase. * Adjusted by age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. † P-value calculated by logistic regression analysis; ‡ P-value calculated by false discovery rate test; P-values < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphism frequencies between ischemic stroke subtype patients and controls.
Table 3. Comparison of the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphism frequencies between ischemic stroke subtype patients and controls.
GenotypeControls
(n = 417)		LAD
(n = 207)		AOR (95% CI) *P†P‡SVD
(n = 149)		AOR (95% CI) *P†P‡CE
(n = 53)		AOR (95% CI) *P†P‡
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T
CC205 (49.2)93 (44.9)1.000 (reference) 57 (38.3)1.000 (reference) 22 (41.5)1.000 (reference)
CT178 (42.7)89 (43.0)1.040 (0.717–1.509)0.835 0.870 73 (49.0)1.375 (0.902–2.097)0.138 0.185 27 (50.9)1.402 (0.766–2.568)0.274 0.737
TT34 (8.2)25 (12.1)1.860 (1.015–3.408)0.0450.178 19 (12.8)2.406 (1.225–4.725)0.0110.0434 (7.5)1.069 (0.329–3.480)0.911 0.911
Additive (CC vs. CT vs. TT)1.237 (0.946–1.618)0.1200.239 1.496 (1.102–2.031)0.0100.037 1.172 (0.747–1.838)0.4900.927
Dominant (CC vs. CT+TT)1.159 (0.815–1.647)0.411 0.548 1.524 (1.019–2.279)0.0410.054 1.342 (0.747–2.412)0.326 0.775
Recessive (CC+CT vs. TT)1.832 (1.028–3.262)0.0400.160 2.059 (1.087–3.899)0.0270.106 0.893 (0.295–2.701)0.841 0.841
NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A
GG333 (79.9)179 (86.5)1.000 (reference) 130 (87.2)1.000 (reference) 43 (81.1)1.000 (reference)
GA82 (19.7)28 (13.5)0.622 (0.380–1.017)0.058 0.207 18 (12.1)0.474 (0.261–0.860)0.0140.056 9 (17.0)0.835 (0.388–1.797)0.644 0.737
AA2 (0.5)0 (0.0)NA0.995 0.995 1 (0.7)1.301 (0.112–15.114)0.834 0.834 1 (1.9)2.829 (0.238–33.596)0.410 0.911
Additive (GG vs. GA vs. AA)0.599 (0.370–0.968)0.0370.146 0.535 (0.306–0.934)0.0280.037 0.969 (0.491–1.914)0.9270.927
Dominant (GG vs. GA+AA)0.606 (0.371–0.989)0.0450.180 0.495 (0.277–0.886)0.0180.044 0.898 (0.429–1.878)0.775 0.775
Recessive (GG+GA vs. AA)NA0.996 0.996 1.468 (0.127–16.980)0.759 0.759 2.690 (0.230–31.473)0.430 0.841
MPG rs2562162 C>T
CC239 (57.3)105 (50.7)1.000 (reference) 65 (43.6)1.000 (reference) 28 (52.8)1.000 (reference)
CT151 (36.2)88 (42.5)1.359 (0.940–1.965)0.103 0.207 72 (48.3)1.569 (1.038–2.372)0.0330.066 20 (37.7)1.156 (0.621–2.152)0.647 0.737
TT27 (6.5)14 (6.8)1.189 (0.576–2.452)0.640 0.853 12 (8.1)1.708 (0.786–3.708)0.176 0.343 5 (9.4)1.276 (0.440–3.697)0.654 0.911
Additive (CC vs. CT vs. TT)1.212 (0.916–1.605)0.1790.239 1.422 (1.040–1.945)0.0270.037 1.121 (0.718–1.753)0.6150.927
Dominant (CC vs. CT+TT)1.332 (0.937–1.894)0.110 0.219 1.589 (1.069–2.363)0.0220.044 1.153 (0.643–2.067)0.633 0.775
Recessive (CC+CT vs. TT)1.052 (0.522–2.121)0.886 0.996 1.412 (0.665–2.996)0.369 0.492 1.179 (0.421–3.300)0.754 0.841
MPG rs710079 C>T
CC290 (69.5)151 (72.9)1.000 (reference) 115 (77.2)1.000 (reference) 38 (71.7)1.000 (reference)
CT118 (28.3)55 (26.6)0.968 (0.652–1.436)0.870 0.870 33 (22.1)0.797 (0.499–1.274)0.344 0.344 14 (26.4)0.893 (0.461–1.728)0.737 0.737
TT9 (2.2)1 (0.5)0.217 (0.026–1.825)0.160 0.319 1 (0.7)0.293 (0.035–2.453)0.257 0.343 1 (1.9)0.819 (0.098–6.834)0.854 0.911
Additive (CC vs. CT vs. TT)0.858 (0.598–1.231)0.4060.406 0.738 (0.482–1.129)0.1610.161 0.894 (0.501–1.594)0.7040.927
Dominant (CC vs. CT+TT)0.910 (0.616–1.344)0.636 0.636 0.754 (0.476–1.196)0.230 0.230 0.891 (0.468–1.695)0.725 0.775
Recessive (CC+CT vs. TT)0.211 (0.025–1.760)0.151 0.301 0.294 (0.035–2.488)0.261 0.492 0.780 (0.094–6.509)0.818 0.841
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; LAD, large-artery disease; SVD, small-vessel disease; CE, cardioembolism; NA, not applicable; NPRL3, nitrogen permease receptor like-3; MPG, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase. * Adjusted by age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. † P-value calculated by logistic regression analysis; ‡ P-value calculated by false discovery rate test; P-values < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table
Table 4. Haplotype analyses for the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms in ischemic stroke patients and controls.
Table 4. Haplotype analyses for the NPRL3 and MPG polymorphisms in ischemic stroke patients and controls.
HaplotypesControls
(2n = 834)		Stroke
(2n = 1038)		OR (95% CI)PP *
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs2562162 C>T/MPG rs710079 C>T
C-G-C-C418 (50.1)525 (50.6)1.000 (reference)
C-A-C-C21 (2.6)10 (1.0)0.379 (0.177–0.814)0.0100.129
C-A-T-T4 (0.4)0 (0.0)0.088 (0.005–1.649)0.0390.254
T-A-C-C2 (0.3)10 (1.0)3.981 (0.867–18.270)0.077 0.335
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs2562162 C>T
C-G-C469 (56.2)568 (54.7)1.000 (reference)
C-A-T9 (1.1)4 (0.4)0.367 (0.112–1.200)0.098 0.196
T-G-T162 (19.5)243 (23.4)1.239 (0.981–1.564)0.072 0.196
T-A-C0 (0.0)7 (0.6)12.390 (0.705–217.600)0.0190.112
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs710079 C>T
C-G-C446 (53.5)568 (54.7)1.000 (reference)
C-G-T56 (6.7)49 (4.8)0.687 (0.459–1.028)0.067 0.133
C-A-C29 (3.5)10 (1.0)0.271 (0.131–0.562)0.00020.001
T-A-C0 (0.0)14 (1.4)22.780 (1.354–383.100)0.0010.002
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/MPG rs2562162 C>T/MPG rs710079 C>T
C-C-C440 (52.8)532 (51.3)1.000 (reference)
T-T-C159 (19.1)237 (22.8)1.233 (0.972–1.563)0.084 0.586
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A
C-G502 (60.2)608 (58.6)1.000 (reference)
T-A0 (0.0)5 (0.5)9.084 (0.501–164.800)0.068 0.154
NPRL3 rs2541618 C>T/MPG rs2562162 C>T
C-C545 (65.4)642 (61.9)1.000 (reference)
T-T162 (19.5)243 (23.4)1.273 (1.012–1.602)0.0390.116
NPRL3 rs75187722 G>A/MPG rs2562162 C>T
G-C553 (66.3)669 (64.5)1.000 (reference)
G-T195 (23.4)284 (27.3)1.204 (0.972–1.492)0.090 0.147
A-T10 (1.2)5 (0.5)0.413 (0.140–1.217)0.098 0.147
OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NPRL3, nitrogen permease receptor like-3; MPG, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase. * P-value calculated by false discovery rate test. P-values < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table
Table 5. Ischemic stroke incidence according to an interaction analysis between NPRL3 and MPG genotypes and environmental factors.
Table 5. Ischemic stroke incidence according to an interaction analysis between NPRL3 and MPG genotypes and environmental factors.
CharacteristicsNPRL3 rs2541618
CC		NPRL3 rs2541618
CT+TT		NPRL3 rs75187722
GG		NPRL3 rs75187722
GA+AA		MPG rs2562162
CC		MPG rs2562162
CT+TT		MPG rs710079
CC		MPG rs710079
CT+TT
Age (936)
<631.000 (reference)1.436 (0.951–2.167)1.000 (reference)0.589 (0.343–1.014)1.000 (reference)1.435 (0.952–2.164)1.000 (reference)0.903 (0.573–1.424)
≥630.903 (0.594–1.373)0.996 (0.655–1.515)0.762 (0.554–1.049)0.746 (0.443–1.255)0.866 (0.583–1.288)1.086 (0.712–1.656)0.785 (0.558–1.104)0.778 (0.501–1.207)
Sex (936)
Male1.000 (reference)1.581 (1.033–2.421)1.000 (reference)0.544 (0.310–0.957)1.000 (reference)1.461 (0.953–2.239)1.000 (reference)0.866 (0.540–1.388)
Female1.254 (0.769–2.044)1.325 (0.823–2.134)0.890 (0.618–1.281)1.031 (0.586–1.812)0.957 (0.601–1.525)1.546 (0.945–2.531)0.946 (0.641–1.394)1.002 (0.606–1.657)
Hypertension
(936)
No1.000 (reference)1.060 (0.714–1.574)1.000 (reference)0.993 (0.598–1.650)1.000 (reference)1.415 (0.948–2.110)1.000 (reference)1.093 (0.715–1.672)
Yes2.085 (1.399–3.105)3.120 (2.116–4.599)2.811 (2.069–3.819)1.339 (0.808–2.218)2.725 (1.878–3.955)3.256 (2.193–4.833)2.720 (1.958–3.777)2.000 (1.290–3.100)
Diabetes mellitus
(936)
No1.000 (reference)1.154 (0.853–1.561)1.000 (reference)0.681 (0.454–1.020)1.000 (reference)1.184 (0.873–1.605)1.000 (reference)0.829 (0.596–1.154)
Yes2.019 (1.217–3.351)2.904 (1.758–4.796)2.048 (1.378–3.042)1.724 (0.833–3.567)1.788 (1.107–2.888)2.984 (1.759–5.063)1.779 (1.187–2.666)2.883 (1.410–5.893)
Hyperlipidemia
(936)
No1.000 (reference)1.180 (0.862–1.616)1.000 (reference)0.594 (0.394–0.897)1.000 (reference)1.340 (0.976–1.839)1.000 (reference)0.821 (0.582–1.159)
Yes1.311 (0.834–2.059)1.769 (1.143–2.736)1.258 (0.894–1.771)1.555 (0.770–3.140)1.601 (1.048–2.446)1.739 (1.107–2.733)1.270 (0.881–1.832)1.533 (0.891–2.637)
Smoking (930)
No1.000 (reference)1.260 (0.900–1.764)1.000 (reference)0.799 (0.517–1.237)1.000 (reference)1.261 (0.899–1.769)1.000 (reference)0.989 (0.682–1.434)
Yes1.478 (0.904–2.416)1.649 (1.033–2.632)1.216 (0.848–1.743)0.880 (0.467–1.659)1.212 (0.766–1.917)1.946 (1.172–3.229)1.303 (0.888–1.912)1.095 (0.654–1.835)
NPRL3, nitrogen permease receptor like-3; MPG, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase. P-values < 0.05 are shown in bold. The number of each subgroup is located next to each subgroup.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ryu, C.S.; Bae, J.; Kim, I.J.; Kim, J.; Oh, S.H.; Kim, O.J.; Kim, N.K. MPG and NPRL3 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Ischemic Stroke Susceptibility and Post-Stroke Mortality. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110947

AMA Style

Ryu CS, Bae J, Kim IJ, Kim J, Oh SH, Kim OJ, Kim NK. MPG and NPRL3 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Ischemic Stroke Susceptibility and Post-Stroke Mortality. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(11):947. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110947

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ryu, Chang Soo, Jinkun Bae, In Jai Kim, Jinkwon Kim, Seung Hun Oh, Ok Joon Kim, and Nam Keun Kim. 2020. "MPG and NPRL3 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Ischemic Stroke Susceptibility and Post-Stroke Mortality" Diagnostics 10, no. 11: 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110947

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop