Next Article in Journal
Microvascular Genesis of Diseases: From Hypothesis to Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Concomitant Venous Disease in Patients with Advanced Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Patient- and Limb-Level Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Severe HAPE in a Remote High-Altitude Research Station in Antarctica

1
French Polar Institute Paul-Émile Victor (IPEV), 29280 Plouzané, France
2
Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises (TAAF), 97410 Saint-Pierre, France
3
Programma Nazionale di Ricerche in Antartide (PNRA), 00185 Rome, Italy
4
European Space Agency (ESA), French Polar Institute Paul-Émile Victor (IPEV), Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2026, 16(2), 313; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020313
Submission received: 18 December 2025 / Revised: 13 January 2026 / Accepted: 14 January 2026 / Published: 11 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)

Abstract

Isolated, confined, and extreme environments hold the opportunity to collect unique biomedical data. These often-remote places present specific medical challenges for deployed expeditioners. Here we report a case of acute severe high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) and its management at a remote research station in Antarctica. At the beginning of the 2023 summer campaign at Concordia Station (3200 m AMSL), a technician presented with shortness of breath and compromised circulation three days after arrival on site. Immediate diagnostics and medical treatments with high-flow oxygen and the use of a mobile hyperbaric chamber after initial resuscitation were administered. Within a time window of 24 h, evacuation to sea level was organised via aircraft (flight duration 4 h, non-pressurised cabin) inside the mobile hyperbaric chamber. The patient was discharged from medical treatment 48 h later in Christchurch (NZ). We conclude that despite rigorous pre-deployment screening, even experienced expeditioners can develop critical medical conditions that require prompt reaction and rescue. Structured assessment tools can aid in their recognition and management.

1. Introduction

The pathophysiological processes of diseases associated with high altitude are subject to ongoing research. Often, they are preceded by a pattern of alterations in pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange [1,2,3,4]. Main risk factors include fast ascent to altitude and high exertion levels [3,5,6]. The Concordia research station is located on an Antarctic plateau called Dome Charlie at 3233 m AMSL (75°06′ S–123°21′ E, Figure 1 and Figure 2). The atmospheric pressure at Concordia can reach equivalent altitudes up to 3800 m AMSL, and the majority of people arrive by plane. Therefore, acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a very common experience for many Concordia expeditioners during the first days after arrival. Through advised rest and clinical monitoring, the medical team tries to prevent severe cases of high-altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) or high-altitude cerebral oedema (HACE), in order to avoid a complicated and dangerous evacuation. The standard evaluation at Concordia station for arriving expeditioners includes assessment of vital signs and safety instructions to rest for 48 h, as well as to present to the medical area for any symptoms, e.g., refractory headache and shortness of breath.

2. Case Presentation

Here, we report about a 34-year-old male with non-significant medical history, who arrived at Concordia station two days prior to symptom onset. At the time, he had extensive local experience and had spent several summer campaigns at Concordia within the last 3 years. Shortly after his arrival, he performed tasks of high physical demand by removing snow from the shelters and containers, and exertion was facilitated by frequently going up and down many flights of stairs inside the station. Approximately 48 h after his arrival, he presented to the hospital area of Concordia with a headache. His vital signs were as follows: SpO2 of 79%, RR 18/min, HR 90/min. He was treated with paracetamol 1 g and 30 min of oxygen 4 L/min via nasal cannula. No prior medication or other treatments were noted at the time. Subsequently, his SpO2 increased to 84%, and he felt subjectively better.
The next day (~72 h after arrival), he did not attend the morning meeting or lunch. His roommates reported continuous nocturnal coughing from the patient. As he was sleeping in shelters located outside the station approximately 500 m away, subsequently, an evacuation to the hospital was initiated. When found by the rescue team, the patient was leaving the dormitory tent close to the Concordia summer camp and was helped into the Pistenbully vehicle to transport him to the station. Initially, he was maintaining his own airway, presented dyspneic with a RR of roughly 25/min, a SpO2 of 81%, and a HR of ~120/min, and his skin looked pale without peripheral or central cyanosis. He was oriented, GCS 15, and able to speak single words, limited by respiratory exhaustion. Auscultation and measurement of blood pressure were impractical and omitted due to heavy polar clothing. The patient received 15 L/min high-flow O2 via a facemask and was transported in a sitting position to the station. At the time, he was wearing jeans, polar boots, and a polar-gear jacket (Marck & Balsan, Gennevilliers, France). The evacuation took around ten minutes in total.
On arrival at the hospital area, he was confused and complained of a frontal headache. The SpO2 was 55% after the transfer to the ICU bed, and his RR was 46/min with the presence of a dry cough. The auscultation showed a crackling noise in both lungs. The blood pressure was measured at 155/110 mmHg symmetrical, and the ECG showed a sinus rhythm with tachycardia at a HR of 160/min. The rest of the clinical examination was normal. A severe high altitude pulmonary oedema was suspected. He received corticosteroids intravenously and was put on 15 L/min of oxygen with a high-flow facemask. A pulmonary X-ray concurred with our diagnosis: right dominant, yet bilateral multifocal asymmetrical pulmonary opacities with patchy distribution. Additionally, focal areas of confluence with some well-defined, rounded opacities were noted (Figure 3).
After two hours of high-flow oxygen administration (15 L/min), the patient appeared less confused, and his HR decreased to ~120/min. We introduced Nifedipine 20 mg slow-release capsule and prepared a session in the mobile hyperbaric chamber (Certec ®, 69210 Sourcieux les Mines, France). Initially, a 1 h session at full use according to the handbook (interval venting) on 220 mbar was conducted. The patient remained off the chamber until the evacuation flight. CPAP, although available, was not utilised due to limited oxygen and pressurised air supply at the station. In parallel, the station leader was organising the medical evacuation to sea level.
As soon as the patient went into a supine position in bed, his SpO2 level deteriorated, and he became dyspneic. Consequently, we decided to build a slope named Pentetto, which enabled a reversed Trendelenburg position of the patient inside the portable hyperbaric chamber (Figure 4).
After one hour in the hyperbaric chamber, the following vital signs were noted: HR 92/min and SpO2 of 92% at 5 L/min oxygen via nasal cannula. Given this temporary recompensation, the situation allowed us to wait for the evacuation outside of the hyperbaric chamber for the rest of the night.
The following day at 8:00 a.m., a Basler DC-3 aircraft arrived at Concordia Station for the medical evacuation. This aircraft type does not have a pressurised cabin; therefore, the patient was placed inside the hyperbaric chamber on the plane for the whole time (Figure 5) and was accompanied by the departing Winter-Over 2023 doctor. A 490 L oxygen cylinder was placed inside the mobile hyperbaric chamber and set to a flow rate of 4 L/min via nasal cannula. The only monitoring device was a pulse oximeter, which could be seen through the chamber window. No verbal communication was possible due to the ambient noise of the aircraft and the sound isolation of the mobile hyperbaric chamber. Therefore, communication was limited to gestures and written notes through the chamber window.
The medical evacuation was uneventful, and SpO2 remained above 99% during the flight. The O2 cylinder, which was placed inside the mobile hyperbaric chamber, emptied after 2.5 h with no impact on the patients’ vital signs. Upon arrival at the Italian Mario Zuchelli Station around 12 p.m., the hyperbaric chamber was opened, and the patient was placed on 8 L/min O2. He was able to walk to the ambulance waiting on the airfield and was brought to the hospital inside the station. Although improved, the patients’ condition did not recover to normal physiology: the O2 flow via cannula was reduced to 3 L/min and then 2 L/min with the SpO2 remaining above 97%, HR 90–96/min, and a RR of 14/min. At the time, there were no laboratory capacities to advance diagnostics to exclude any underlying conditions, such as cardiac failure or pneumonia. After a telemedical discussion with the TAAF medical chief (Terres australes et antarctiques françaises), the decision to evacuate the patient to New Zealand was made. The same day, an Italian transcontinental military flight was scheduled for 10 pm local time and brought the patient to Christchurch. The second flight was also uneventful, and 2 to 4 L/min of oxygen was administered.
Upon arrival in New Zealand, the medical evacuation team attended an emergency room, where the patient received 2 L/min of oxygen via nasal canula. The following laboratory results were documented: haemoglobin 14.1 g/L, haematocrit 0.42%, platelets 188 G/L, WBC 12.5 G/L, Na 139 mmol/L, K 4.3 mmol/L, creatinine 69 µ mol/L, EGFR 117 mL/min, CRP 60 mg/L, troponin us 9 mmol/L, blood gas pH 7.43, pO2 71 mmHg, pCO2 36 mmHg, HCO3 23.8 mEq/L. A chest X-ray showed opacities, more pronounced on the right side than the left, consistent with mild-moderate pulmonary oedema. He was transferred to a General Medicine Ward and discharged the following day. Six days after his discharge, he had fully recovered and was able to go hiking as usual without any symptoms.
A full clinical and paraclinical examination in Chamonix, France, was performed six months later by a Medical Doctor specialising in Mountain and High-Altitude Medicine, which revealed no comorbidities that could explain the HAPE episode. No cardiologic nor respiratory conditions, in particular no patent foramen ovale, were found. Echocardiography showed no further abnormalities.

3. Discussion

The physiopathology of mountain sickness is not yet perfectly understood. However, HAPE seems to be a form of hydrostatic pulmonary oedema with altered alveolar-capillary permeability [4]. Therefore, exposure to high altitude would lead to vasoconstriction of the pulmonary arterioles and increase the pressure inside the pulmonary capillaries [2]. Also, the vital functional capacity was found to be reduced at altitude, which could be explained by a secondary reduction in muscular compliance due to hypoxia [7]. Hypoxia and an increase in capillary permeability are associated with interstitial oedema [3,4,8]. The interstitial fluid accumulation in lung tissue could induce reduced compliance and a decrease in respiratory muscle strength, resulting in an uneven distribution of ventilation and gas exchange impairments [7]. In the case of our patient, after full recovery and examination, it can be assumed that the cause of HAPE was physical exertion after a rapid, unacclimatized ascent. When a rapid ascent is not avoidable, e.g., arriving at Concordia by plane, it seems that expeditioners need to be at rest for at least 48 h after arrival, to prevent HAPE, AMS, and HACE [6,9].
In general, cold and arid environments, such as research stations within mainland Antarctica, seem to show a higher incidence of AMS than compared to exposure to altitude in moderate climates [10]. The main difficulty at Concordia is the limited accessibility due to its location on a high plateau in the middle of Antarctica, causing many expeditioners to arrive by plane without sufficient acclimatisation. However, we know that normally the ascent to higher altitudes needs to be progressive to avoid these classic mountain illnesses due to hypobaric hypoxia [5]. While HACE often follows worsening symptoms of AMS, HAPE usually develops without precipitating factors and thus presents critical challenges in remote places due to unpredictability [11,12]. A consensus exists that physical exertion significantly contributes to the development of HAPE [5,12,13,14], explaining the need for strict limitation in remote places such as Concordia. In our case, high exertion led to early diagnosis of moderate AMS, progressing to an acute presentation of HAPE. Especially the overlap of classic AMS symptoms during the absence of severe impairment can challenge early recognition of HAPE and present potential diagnostic pitfalls. Reports of nocturnal coughs in combination with previous attendance in the medical area should trigger early assessment. Data on escalation strategies are currently limited, and management plans are even more difficult under the questioned specificity of the Lake Louise Score, which may not sufficiently monitor disease development and severity [15]. The use of systems such as the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) could be helpful in identifying medical problems early [16]. In addition to the clinical picture, laboratory tests and chest X-Ray, non-invasive ultrasound assessment could be used to aid the diagnosis of HAPE [1,17]. We note that in our case report, non-cyanosis was mentioned during the primary survey. We attribute this to the bright lighting conditions at the station during the first assessment outside, peripheral vasoconstriction as a result of the cold environment, leading to a reduced cutaneous blood flow, masking cyanosis, and the heavy polar gear worn by the patient during the rescue period [18,19,20].
This case report adds to a small number of previously published cases of HAPE in Antarctica. Rose et al. [21] reported three cases of expeditioners suffering from HAPE at Amundsen-Scott Station at 2835 m AMSL, whole seven patients had to be evacuated during one season only. Nowadly et al. [22] presented two cases of HAPE, specifically investigating the use of chest X-Rays correlated to disease severity. The reported cases presented within a timeframe of 4 days and SpO2 ranging from 41% to 90%, which is in keeping with our observation. Overall, the incidence of AMS seems to affect 52% of staff arriving at Amundsen-Scott station [10]. For HAPE, prevalence ranges between 0.2% and 15% for expeditioners ascending to elevations above 2000 m AMSL (up to 5500 m), with emphasis on a reverse correlation between period of ascent and likelihood of occurrence, as well as for altitude itself [12,23]. Key contributing factors include rapid ascent, altitudes above 2500–3000 m AMSL, prior history of HAPE, genetic predisposition, structural conditions such as open foramen ovale or pulmonary artery atresia, exertion, cold exposure, and concurrent respiratory infections [14,24,25,26]. Furthermore, the use of oral contraceptives was associated with a higher risk for AMS, and it is reasonable to assume it might also predispose to HAPE [27].
To mitigate the hazards of arriving at remote locations such as Concordia, pre-acclimatisation strategies could be employed to prepare expeditioners. Following expert advice and guidelines, a stepwise reduction in oxygen concentration during the nights preceding the deployment can significantly decrease risks associated with rapid, unacclimatized ascent [28,29]. Financial and logistic burden are within reasonable limits as tents and oxygen generators could be used at home. Experts advised the following altitude profile for pre-acclimatisation in Concordia: first night at 15.5% O2 (corresponding to ~2500 m), two nights at 14.5% (~3000 m), and probably (just to improve safety even more) one night at 13.5%, with reference to the experience by Küpper et al. [29]. Regardless of preparation efforts, prompt response to AMS and HAPE is required; in Table 1, we summarize a management plan for Concordia station. Additionally, early intervention with immediately available aids is advised, e.g., Tannheimer et al. have shown significant improvements in SpO2 by using simple means such as auto-PEEP [30].
Often summarised as ICE, standing for Isolated Confined and Extreme environment, the weather conditions are extreme and result in significant physiological adaptation processes in the human body. At sea level, the barometric pressure is around 1013 hPa, and oxygen saturation is normally around 98% in healthy individuals. In Concordia, even after many months spent at the base, SpO2 rarely increases above 90% at rest. Comparison is often made to a desert-like climate on the basis of its mean annual precipitation. This falls into the ‘hyper arid’ category, shared with the Sahara, Namib, Atacama, and other great deserts of the world. As mentioned earlier, the incidence of AMS seems to be higher in cold and arid conditions [10]; thresholds for symptom monitoring or admission to the medical area should be lowered as a precaution to acknowledge the differences between “Physical altitude” and “Pressure Altitude”. Pressure altitude is the single most important variable of changes in physiology at high altitude [31].
On a separate note, technical factors should be flagged when using pressurised oxygen cylinders in mobile hyperbaric chambers, as this can result in a significant fire hazard. Experts in the field usually recommend strict avoidance of common expedition clothing as it often contains plastic content. This can lead to friction and subsequent electrical charging potential sparks and ignition, especially during the use of an O2-source. Expert advice includes jeans and a T-shirt, or wool underwear and blanket only, among the safest options to use in a mobile hyperbaric chamber. Another practical aspect is the limited oxygen supply in remote places and during repatriation flights. Interval administration may extend the duration of increased FiO2.
For reference, Figure 6 shows the pressure and temperature data from November to February (time window of the summer campaign at Concordia) and the week when the underlying case occurred.

4. Conclusions

In the peculiar and remote environment of Concordia, the prevention and management of mountain diseases must be considered carefully. Medical aptitude and awareness of the risks are essential to mitigate risk to the expeditioners.
For the majority of Concordia expeditioners, arrival at Dome C by plane cannot be avoided. Therefore, prevention of mountain diseases is paramount and should include avoidance of physical work for at least 48 h after arrival. Close monitoring of the arriving staff within this critical period seems mandatory. Where available, pre-acclimatisation strategies should be used.
Due to the weather and geographic conditions at the Concordia station, a medical evacuation is sometimes impossible for many days, even during the Antarctic summer period. If descent to sea level cannot be achieved immediately, the use of a mobile hyperbaric chamber, administering additional oxygen, seems to be the best treatment to improve the conditions of patients with HAPE quickly in remote areas.
Following the event, the management plan at the station was updated according to the information provided in Table 1. The stock of pressurised oxygen was increased to enable CPAP treatment and longer field care if needed.
It is important that we continue to study early monitoring of mountain disease to improve prevention and care at high altitude locations in Antarctica.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L. and S.F. (Sascha Freigang); methodology, F.L., S.F. (Sascha Freigang) and S.F. (Stephane Fraize); validation, S.F. (Sascha Freigang), P.L., S.V. and R.S.; investigation, F.L. and S.F. (Sascha Freigang); resources, R.S., P.L. and G.B.F.; data curation, F.L., S.F. (Sascha Freigang), S.F. (Stephane Fraize) and M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L., S.F. (Sascha Freigang) and M.L.; writing—review and editing, S.F. (Stephane Fraize), P.L., S.V.; visualization, F.L., S.F. (Sascha Freigang), and R.S.; supervision, P.L. and S.V.; project administration, P.L., S.V., R.S. and G.B.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. This research was conducted at Concordia Research Station, jointly operated by the French Polar Institute (IPEV), the Italian Antarctic Programme (PNRA). The research doctor position was supported by the European Space Agency (ESA).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This is a single clinical case prepared retrospectively as a descriptive medical case report; formal Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee approval is not required under the applicable legal and regulatory frameworks governing the jurisdictions involved. Antarctica: Activities were conducted in accordance with the Antarctic Treaty System, under which medical care and reporting of clinical cases fall under national regulations of the operating programmes rather than a dedicated Antarctic IRB. No interventional research was conducted. France: Under French law (Loi n°2012–300, dite Loi Jardé and subsequent decrees), retrospective case reports describing routine clinical care without modification of management do not constitute “recherche impliquant la personne humaine” and therefore do not require ethics committee approval. Italy: According to Italian regulations and guidance from national ethics committees, single, retrospective case reports based on standard care and fully anonymised data are exempt from prior ethics approval. Australia: In line with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NHMRC), case reports that involve only one individual, are retrospective, non-interventional, and use de-identified data do not require Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent for publication has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all expeditioners who helped and supported the rescue process and ensured safety and recovery of the patient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMSLAbove Mean Sea Level
AMSAcute Mountain Sickness
bpmBeats per minute
CPAPContinuous Positive Airway Pressure
DCDome C
ECGElectrocardiogram
EPAPExpiratory Positive Airway Pressure
HACEHigh-altitude cerebral oedema
HAPEHigh altitude pulmonary oedema
PEEPPositive End-Expiratory Pressure
NZNew Zealand
PNRA Programma Nazionale di Ricerche in Antartide
TAAF Terres australes et antarctiques françaises
U + EUrea + Electrolytes

References

  1. Hundt, N.; Apel, C.; Bertsch, D.; Cerfontaine, C.; van der Giet, M.; van der Giet, S.; Graß, M.; Haunolder, M.; Heussen, N.M.; Jäger, J.; et al. Variables Influencing the Pressure and Volume of the Pulmonary Circulation as Risk Factors for Developing High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Swenson, E.R.; Maggiorini, M.; Mongovin, S.; Gibbs, J.S.R.; Greve, I.; Mairbäurl, H.; Bärtsch, P. Pathogenesis of high-altitude pulmonary edema. JAMA 2002, 287, 2228–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhagi, S.; Srivastava, S.; Singh, S.B. High-altitude pulmonary edema: Review. J. Occup. Health 2014, 56, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Richalet, J.P. High altitude pulmonary oedema: Still a place for controversy? Thorax 1995, 50, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luks, A.M.; Beidleman, B.A.; Freer, L.; Grissom, C.K.; Keyes, L.E.; McIntosh, S.E.; Rodway, G.W.; Schoene, R.B.; Zafren, K.; Hackett, P.H. Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Acute Altitude Illness: 2024 Update. Wilderness Environ. Med. 2024, 35, 2S–19S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hultgren, H.N.; A Marticorena, E. High altitude pulmonary edema: Epidemiologic observations in Peru. Chest 1978, 74, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Clarenbach, C.F.; Senn, O.; Christ, A.L.; Fischler, M.; Maggiorini, M.; Bloch, K.E. Lung function and breathing pattern in subjects developing high altitude pulmonary edema. PLoS One 2012, 7, e41188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, I.; Kapila, C.C.; Khanna, P.K.; Nanda, R.B.; Rao, B.D. High-altitude pulmonary oedema. Lancet 1965, 285, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lobenhoffer, H.P.; Zink, R.A.; Brendel, W. High Altitude Pulmonary Edema: Analysis of 166 Cases. In High Altitude Physiology and Medicine; Brendel, W., Zink, R.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Anderson, P.J.; Miller, A.D.; O’MAlley, K.A.; Ceridon, M.L.; Beck, K.C.; Wood, C.M.; Wiste, H.J.; Mueller, J.J.; Johnson, J.B.; Johnson, B.D. Incidence and symptoms of high altitude illness in South Pole workers: Antarctic study of altitude physiology (ASAP). Clin. Med. Insights Circ. Respir. Pulm. Med. 2011, 5, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Apkarian, A.V. Chronic Pain and Neuroplasticity. NIH Public Access 2012, 152, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bärtsch, P.; Swenson, E.R. Acute high-altitude illnesses. New Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 1664–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Basnyat, B.; Murdoch, D.R. High-altitude illness. Lancet 2003, 361, 1967–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gallagher, S.A.; Hackett, P.H. High-altitude illness. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2004, 22, 329–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moore, J.; MacInnis, M.J.; Dallimore, J.; Wilkes, M. The Lake Louise Score: A Critical Assessment of Its Specificity. High Alt. Med. Biol. 2020, 21, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Smith, G.B.; Redfern, O.C.; Pimentel, M.A.; Gerry, S.; Collins, G.S.; Malycha, J.; Prytherch, D.; E Schmidt, P.; Watkinson, P.J. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). Clin. Med. 2019, 19, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fagenholz, P.J.; Gutman, J.A.; Murray, A.F.; Noble, V.E.; Thomas, S.H.; Harris, N.S. Chest ultrasonography for the diagnosis and monitoring of high-altitude pulmonary edema. Chest 2007, 131, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Changizi, M.; Rio, K. Harnessing color vision for visual oximetry in central cyanosis. Med Hypotheses 2010, 74, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McNamara, R.; Taylor, C.M.; McKenzie, D.K.; Coroneo, M.T.; Dain, S.J. Colour change in cyanosis and the confusions of congenital colour vision deficient observers. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. J. Br. Coll. Ophthalmic Opt. 2010, 30, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arnold, J.T.; Lloyd, A.B.; Bailey, S.J.; Fujimoto, T.; Matsutake, R.; Takayanagi, M.; Nishiyasu, T.; Fujii, N. The nitric oxide dependence of cutaneous microvascular function to independent and combined hypoxic cold exposure. J. Appl. Physiol 2020, 129, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rose, J.S.; Law, J.; Scheuring, R.; Ramage, M.H.; McKeith, J.J. Serious altitude illness at the South Pole. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 2020, 91, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nowadly, C.D.; Solomon, A.J.; Burke, S.M.; Rose, J.S. Evaluation of Serial Chest Radiographs of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema Requiring Medical Evacuation from South Pole Station, Antarctica: From Diagnosis to Recovery. Mil. Med. 2021, 186, e1135–e1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Korzeniewski, K.; Nitsch-Osuch, A.; Guzek, A.; Juszczak, D. High altitude pulmonary edema in mountain climbers. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2015, 209, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Naughton, G.; Carlson, J.; Fairweather, I. Determining the Variability of Performance on Wingate Anaerobic Tests in Children Aged 6–12 Years. Int. J. Sports Med. 1992, 13, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bärtsch, P. High altitude pulmonary edema. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1999, 31, S23–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abman, S.H.; Hansmann, G.; Archer, S.L.; Ivy, D.D.; Adatia, I.; Chung, W.K.; Hanna, B.D.; Rosenzweig, E.B.; Raj, J.U.; Cornfield, D.; et al. Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: Guidelines From the American Heart Association and American Thoracic Society. Circulation 2015, 132, 2037–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Harrison, M.F.; Anderson, P.; Miller, A.; O’mAlley, K.; Richert, M.; Johnson, J.; Johnson, B.D. Oral contraceptive use and acute mountain sickness in South Pole workers. Aviat. Space. Environ. Med. 2013, 84, 1166–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. KÜPper, T.; Milledge, J.S.; Hillebrandt, D.; KubalovÁ, J.; Hefti, U.; Basnyat, B.; Gieseler, U.; Pullan, R.; SchÖFfl, V. Work in hypoxic conditions—Consensus statement of the Medical Commission of the Union Internationale des Associations d’Alpinisme (UIAA MedCom). Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2011, 55, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Küpper, T.E.A.H.; Schöffl, V. Preacclimatization in hypoxic chambers for high altitude sojourns. Sleep Breath. 2010, 14, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tannheimer, M.; Lechner, R. Initial Treatment of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema: Comparison of Oxygen and Auto-PEEP. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Helman, A.; Workman, J.; Sype, J. The Determination of Pressure Altitude and Implications for High Altitude Physiology. 2010. Available online: http://www.cohp.org/ak/notes/pressure_altitude_v6.html (accessed on 25 December 2025).
Figure 1. Main Towers of Concordia Research Station as seen from the summer camp.
Figure 1. Main Towers of Concordia Research Station as seen from the summer camp.
Life 16 00313 g001
Figure 2. Drone Image of Main Towers on left side and Summer Camp on bottom right side; the rescue was conducted from the tents seen on the bottom right side (5 white squares) to the Main Towers.
Figure 2. Drone Image of Main Towers on left side and Summer Camp on bottom right side; the rescue was conducted from the tents seen on the bottom right side (5 white squares) to the Main Towers.
Life 16 00313 g002
Figure 3. Initial assessment chest X-Ray.
Figure 3. Initial assessment chest X-Ray.
Life 16 00313 g003
Figure 4. Mobile hyperbaric chamber on Pentetto.
Figure 4. Mobile hyperbaric chamber on Pentetto.
Life 16 00313 g004
Figure 5. First flight installation (Basler flight from Dome Charlie to Mario Zucchelli Station).
Figure 5. First flight installation (Basler flight from Dome Charlie to Mario Zucchelli Station).
Life 16 00313 g005
Figure 6. Overview of temperature and atmospheric pressure during the summer campaign at Concordia, the marked area depicts the period of the incident.
Figure 6. Overview of temperature and atmospheric pressure during the summer campaign at Concordia, the marked area depicts the period of the incident.
Life 16 00313 g006
Table 1. DC protocol prevention and care of mountain disease.
Table 1. DC protocol prevention and care of mountain disease.
DiagnosisAMS/HACEHAPE
AMSHACE
Symptomsheadache + 1 symptoms
(nausea/vomiting, fatigue, lassitude, dizziness)
Moderate-severe AMS symptoms + neurologic sign: ataxia, severe
lassitude, altered mental status, encephalopathy
Dyspnoea, non-productive cough, fatigue, weakness, and fever are possible.
Mild AMS:
All symptoms of mild intensity
Moderate-severe
AMS:
All symptoms of
moderate-severe intensity
Lake Louise AMS Score3–5 6–12 NA NA
Differential
diagnosis
Migraine, dehydration, hyponatremia, viral infection Migraine, dehydration,
hyponatremia, viral infection
Neurologic stroke, hypoglycemia, severe dehydration,
hyponatremia, viral infection
Pneumonia, asthma, bronchospasm,
pneumothorax,
embolism, heart failure, viral infection
PreventionACETAZOLAMIDE 125 mg/12 h—DEXAMETHASONE 2 mg/6 h NIFEDIPINE 30 mg/12 h
48 h with no physical exercise after arrival in DC
TreatmentPARACETAMOL/
ACETAZOLAMIDE
250 mg/12 h
PARACETAMOL/
ACETAZOLAMIDE
250 mg/12 h
DEXAMETHASONE
8 mg and then 4 mg/6 h (oral, IM or IV)
NIFEDIPINE 30 mg/12 h
TADAFIL (10 mg/12 h) or
SILDENAFIL (50 mg/8 h) if N. Contradicted
OxygenNo need
(Or if Sp02 < 80%)
For Sp02 > 90% (1–2 L/min > 2 h) For Sp02 > 90%
Consider a hyperbaric chamber
For Sp02 > 90%
Consider a hyperbaric chamber + Pentetto, CPAP, EPAP
SurveillanceDaily Hospital visits twice a day/sleep in base Hospitalisation—
Consider evacuation with the station leader and the MD chief
Hospitalisation—
Consider evacuation with the station leader and the MD chief
ExamsNo need No need U + E, Blood gas Blood gas, ECG,
chest X-ray,
POCUS lung (B lines)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Larcher, F.; Laforet, P.; Fraize, S.; Lecca, M.; Scipinotti, R.; Fasani, G.B.; Vagnoni, S.; Freigang, S. Severe HAPE in a Remote High-Altitude Research Station in Antarctica. Life 2026, 16, 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020313

AMA Style

Larcher F, Laforet P, Fraize S, Lecca M, Scipinotti R, Fasani GB, Vagnoni S, Freigang S. Severe HAPE in a Remote High-Altitude Research Station in Antarctica. Life. 2026; 16(2):313. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Larcher, Fanny, Paul Laforet, Stephane Fraize, Mario Lecca, Riccardo Scipinotti, Gianluca Bianchi Fasani, Salvatore Vagnoni, and Sascha Freigang. 2026. "Severe HAPE in a Remote High-Altitude Research Station in Antarctica" Life 16, no. 2: 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020313

APA Style

Larcher, F., Laforet, P., Fraize, S., Lecca, M., Scipinotti, R., Fasani, G. B., Vagnoni, S., & Freigang, S. (2026). Severe HAPE in a Remote High-Altitude Research Station in Antarctica. Life, 16(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop