Next Article in Journal
Adaptation of Plants to UV-B Radiation with Altitude in Tuha Basin: Synergistic Regulation of Epidermal Structure, Secondary Metabolites, and Organic Element Allocation
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Non-Local Means Algorithm for Breast Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a 3D-Printed Breast-Mimicking Phantom
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Three DNA Isolation Methods and Two Sequencing Techniques for the Study of the Human Microbiota
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microbiota in Health and Disease

by
Amélia Sarmento
1,2,* and
Catarina D. Simões
1
1
RISE-Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, Fernando Pessoa Teaching and Culture Foundation, Rua Carlos da Maia 296, 4200-150 Porto, Portugal
2
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2025, 15(9), 1374; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15091374
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 21 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiota in Health and Disease)

1. Introduction

In recent years microbiota has been shown to strongly influence host metabolism and immunity, resulting in a huge impact in human physiology [1,2,3]. Understanding the role that different microbial groups and their metabolites play in modulating those processes is pivotal both for the opening of new perspectives towards disease prevention and for developing new and personalized therapies. In line with this, the main aim of the current Special Issue was to join different contributions addressing the state-of-the art research on human microbiota and its impact on human well-being or disease.
Fourteen contributions were included in this Special Issue. Contribution 1 evaluated various techniques for extracting DNA from fecal samples and breast tissue, as well as different sequencing approaches, with the aim of enhancing result accuracy by reducing the influence of human DNA contamination. Other contributions focused on the resilience and dynamics of gut microbiota (Contribution 2) and the interconnected axes with other organ systems, such as the skin (Contributions 3,4), lung (Contribution 5), liver (Contribution 6) and brain (Contributions 7–9). Finally, therapeutic approaches based on gut microbiota modulation are discussed by Contributions 10–14.

2. Development of Reliable Methods for Studying Human Microbiota

Contribution 1, by Plaza-Díaz and collaborators, investigated the optimal methods for studying the human microbiota, specifically focusing on fecal and breast samples from healthy women and breast cancer patients. The researchers compared the efficacy of three DNA isolation techniques (mechanical lysis, trypsin digestion, and saponin-based differential lysis) to minimize human DNA contamination, which often hinders microbial analysis. Additionally, they evaluated two sequencing approaches, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing, to identify discrepancies in the microbiome profiles obtained. The study concluded that for samples rich in microbial DNA, like feces, 16S rRNA sequencing was most effective, while for tissues with complex microbial compositions, shotgun sequencing combined with the trypsin DNA extraction method offered the most accurate results.

3. Dynamics of Gut Microbiota Populations

Several reports have demonstrated that dominant gut microbial strains are unique to each individual and generally remain stable over time [4]. However, various conditions (e.g., treatment with antibiotics) may induce perturbations in these communities. After exposure to disruptive conditions, the dominant microbial strains usually recover, but the mechanisms involved in this process are not yet fully understood.
In Contribution 2, Koo & Morrow highlight that dominant fecal microbial strains tend to remain stable over time, despite antibiotic treatment. This study investigates the presence and dynamics of Bacteroidales-specific antimicrobial protein (BSAP) genes, specifically BSAP-2 (that lyses Bacteroides uniformis strains) and BSAP-3 (that lyses Bacteroides vulgatus strains), in human fecal microbial communities. This research utilized three publicly available longitudinal metagenomic datasets from healthy individuals and individuals treated with either a single antibiotic (cefprozil) or with multiple antibiotics (meropenem, gentamicin, and vancomycin). BLAST+ and Integrative Genomics Viewer tools were used for gene analysis. The findings showed that, following antibiotic treatment, the BSAP gene pattern from most individuals recovered to be the same as the pre-antibiotic strain. Although in a few individuals incomplete BSAP-3 genes were observed at early recovery times, they were replaced by B. vulgatus strains with complete BSAP-3 genes. These observations are consistent with the stability of Bacteroides strains over time and provide insights into the selection dynamics of dominant strains in the gastrointestinal tract following perturbation.

4. Skin Microbiota and Inflammatory Skin Diseases

The skin microbiota is gaining attention as a potential contributor to inflammatory skin diseases [5,6]. Indeed, skin and gut microbiota dysbiosis can influence skin inflammation through activation of immune pathways [7]. Two contributions focus on the relationship between skin inflammation and microbiota composition.
The preliminary study by Ferček et al. (Contribution 3) investigated the bacterial communities on the skin around the eyes (periocular region), comparing healthy individuals to those with inflammatory skin conditions like atopic dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, rosacea, and contact dermatitis. The researchers collected skin swabs to extract DNA, which was further analyzed to identify and quantify the different bacteria present, aiming to understand if specific microbial imbalances contribute to these diseases. Key findings included a significant difference in bacterial diversity between healthy and affected skin, with certain bacterial genera like Rothia, Corynebacterium, Bartonella and Paracoccus being more prevalent in patients with specific conditions, while others like Anaerococcus, Bacteroides, Porphyromonas, and Enhydrobacter were more abundant in healthy controls. The study suggests that changes in the periocular skin microbiota could play a role in the development of inflammatory skin diseases. The development of new diagnostic tools or targeted therapies that modify the microbiota to restore skin health or prevent disease progression may be assisted by an understanding of these microbial differences.
Contribution 4 (study by Chung et al.) investigated the frequency of dendritic epidermal T cells (DETCs)—a γδ T cell population residing in the skin—in mice under different housing conditions. The researchers observed that local skin inflammation significantly increased DETC numbers in Balb/c mice and that housing conditions impacted DETC populations. Exposure to bedding from a non-barrier environment led to higher DETC counts and distinct gut microbial compositions, notably an increase in Bacillaceae and a decrease in Prevotellaceae, which are known to influence T cell populations. These findings suggest a strong connection between the abundance of DETCs and the gut microbial composition, environmental stimuli, and the dynamics of skin immunity.

5. Gut–Lung Axis—Connection Between Gut Microbiota and Lung Diseases

Gut microbiota has been associated with the development of lung immunity [8,9]. Indeed, lungs and intestines share multiple epithelial structures, like goblet cells and IgA secretion. Perturbations of gut microbiota in early life lead to long-term deficient lung immunity [10], which demonstrates the importance of the gut–lung axis.
The comprehensive review by Alswat A.S. (Contribution 5) explores the profound connection between the gut microbiota and overall host health, with a particular focus on the gut–lung axis. This review highlights how the complex ecosystem of microorganisms in our gut plays a role in susceptibility to various respiratory conditions like asthma, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung infections. It emphasizes that a balanced gut microbiota, a condition known as “eubiosis,” is vital for well-being, while an imbalance, or “dysbiosis,” can contribute to numerous diseases. Furthermore, the study addresses promising therapeutic approaches targeting the gut microbiota such as dietary interventions, the use of probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, and postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation aimed at restoring this crucial microbial balance for improved respiratory health outcomes.

6. Liver Diseases and Bile Microbiota

Bile secretion, considered sterile in the past, has been shown to harbor a diverse microbial community, differing between healthy and pathological conditions of the biliary tract [11,12].
Lee et al. (Contribution 6) investigated the possible role of the bile microbiome and metabolites in cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) development, a type of bile duct cancer with high mortality. The authors collected bile samples from patients with and without CCC to analyze microbial composition and metabolic profiles, discovering that patients with CCC exhibited lower microbial diversity and a higher abundance of Escherichia coli. Notably, the study also identified significantly lower levels of isoleucine in the bile of CCC patients. Further in vitro experiments revealed that isoleucine suppressed CCC cell proliferation, suggesting its potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target for this challenging disease.

7. Neurological Disorders and the Gut–Brain Axis

The gut–brain axis represents a crucial bidirectional communication pathway between the central nervous system, the enteric nervous system, and the brain’s emotional and cognitive centers [13]. Three review reports (Contributions 7–9) indicate its pivotal role in numerous neurological diseases.
In Contribution 7, Nakhai and collaborators present an extensive review on the microbiota–gut–brain axis. The text systematically details how dysbiosis is implicated in conditions ranging from developmental disabilities, like Rett syndrome and autism spectrum disorder, to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s, as well as mental health conditions like depression and schizophrenia. It further investigates how therapeutics, diet, lifestyle factors, and early life experiences can, in turn, impact the interactions within the gut–brain axis, offering potential avenues for microbe-based interventions to improve patient outcomes.
Che Mohd Nassir et al. (Contribution 8) explored the importance of the gut–brain axis in general, with a particular focus on its role in the context of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). The authors describe potential links between gut microbiota and CSVD, highlighting how imbalances in gut bacteria contribute to neuroinflammation, vascular dysfunction, and impaired waste clearance in the brain. The paper also introduces the glymphatic system, the brain’s waste removal pathway, and the role of circulating cell-derived microparticles as key mediators in these complex interactions. Ultimately, the review suggests that modulating the gut microbiota through interventions like probiotics and diet could offer novel therapeutic avenues to improve brain health and mitigate the progression of CSVD.
Contribution 9 discusses the emerging role of the gut microbiota in mood disorders. This review article describes how dysbiosis contributes to conditions such as bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder by affecting neurotransmitters and inflammation. Finally, it reviews current and future therapeutic approaches including dietary interventions, prebiotics, psychobiotics (probiotics that confer mental health benefits), and fecal microbiota transplantation, highlighting the need for personalized medicine and further rigorous research to develop effective, targeted treatments for mood disorders.

8. Therapeutic Strategies Based on Microbiota Modulation

Administration of probiotics/postbiotics and dietary supplements was demonstrated to be beneficial for the management of gut and systemic cancers and inflammatory diseases [14,15]. Several contributions of this Special Issue addressed the therapeutic potential of different formulations.
Zhong et al. (Contribution 10) explored the use of postbiotics in colorectal cancer treatment. Postbiotics are substances produced by probiotic species and so postbiotic formulations do not contains living organisms [16]. The authors used a mouse model to investigate the inhibitory effects of administered Weizmannia coagulans MZY531 postbiotics on colorectal cancer growth. Evaluation of tumor growth, body weight, and various biochemical and cellular markers was performed. The results demonstrated that W. coagulans MZY531 postbiotics significantly inhibited tumor growth, reduced tumor size, and lowered serum levels of tumor markers. Multiple mechanisms of action against colorectal cancer were activated by the postbiotic treatment. The effects of postbiotics were often more pronounced than those observed with probiotics.
In Contribution 11, Ghannoum et al. demonstrated the ability of a probiotic–amylase blend to modulate gut microbiota, leading to a significant increase in beneficial Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a decrease in potential pathogens like Bacillus thuringiensis and Macrococcus caseolyticus. The authors hypothesized that these changes are possibly related to the improvement of clinical gastrointestinal symptoms observed in a previous study using the same cohort.
The study from Ko et al. (Contribution 12) aimed to investigate the effects of red beet powder and betanin pigment on the composition and metabolic activity of human gut microbiota using an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and fecal fermentation model. Fecal samples from healthy subjects were used, which were classified into three enterotypes: Phocaeicola, Prevotella, and Bifidobacterium. The results suggest that beetroot powder and betaine pigment have enterotype-specific responses in the gut microbiota and SCFA production. S3-Bifidobacterium enterotype subjects showed the most significant decrease in alpha diversity (Chao index) and a different trend in other microbial changes as compared to the other enterotypes.
Treatment with probiotics may also be used to ameliorate liver function. Hizo & Rampelotto (Contribution 13) systematically reviewed the impact of the probiotic Bifidobacterium on various liver diseases and gut microbiota, including studies that used Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies for microbiota analysis. The core purpose was to evaluate Bifidobacterium’s potential as a safe and effective treatment by restoring intestinal microbiota balance, reducing inflammation, and improving clinical parameters in conditions like Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Alcoholic Liver Disease, and Cirrhosis. Bifidobacterium proved highly effective in restoring the balance of gut microbiota in humans and animals, leading to improved clinical and biochemical parameters in these diseases. A significant gap in the literature regarding Bifidobacterium efficacy in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma was identified in this study, particularly concerning NGS-based research.
In Contribution 14, Mutlutürk and collaborators reported a clinical study exploring how a specially designed dietary intervention influenced the gut microbiota and various health markers in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. The study found that adhering to this “Ideal Food Pyramid,” which differed from the standard Mediterranean diet by emphasizing specific vegetables, gluten-free grains, and supplements while avoiding salt and sugar, led to positive clinical benefits. These benefits included improvements in anthropometric measurements, disease activity, and certain biochemical parameters, alongside beneficial shifts in the gut microbiome composition by decreasing harmful bacteria like Prevotella copri and increasing beneficial ones such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. This suggests that targeted dietary approaches can serve as a valuable complementary strategy for RA management.

9. Conclusions

This Special Issue illustrates the important role of the human microbiota in maintaining health and influencing the development and outcome of numerous diseases, from localized conditions like inflammatory skin diseases to systemic conditions affecting the liver, brain, and overall gut function. The body of evidence presented here, largely enabled by recent sequencing technologies, offers deeper insights into the intricate mechanisms of host–microbe interactions.
While significant advances have been made in recent years, particularly in identifying microbial signatures and the efficacy of various interventions, the field still requires more robust and comprehensive research. Future studies must focus on larger cohorts, long-term longitudinal analyses and investigation of causal relationships and mechanisms of pathology, moving beyond simple correlations. The development of personalized microbiota-based interventions, tailored to an individual’s unique microbial profile, genetic trends and lifestyle, is a promising avenue for more effective therapies.
A deeper insight into the therapeutic potential of the human microbiota necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, integrating microbiology, nutrition, bioinformatics, and clinical science. This Special Issue demonstrates the dynamic and rapidly evolving nature of microbiome research, paving the way for revolutionary strategies in disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Acknowledgments

In the spirit of transparency and ethical professional practice, we would like to inform that this manuscript was supported by Generative Artificial Intelligence tools. These technologies were used as assistants for instrumental tasks, such as text optimization and initial ideation, and as support for consistency and structure development. However, the intellectual authorship, strategic vision and editorial integrity of this manuscript are of the sole responsibility of the authors. All the ideas, the narrative, the text flow presented and the careful editing of the final content were conceived and executed by Amélia Sarmento and Catarina Simões. The use of AI was therefore a means to enhance the execution of an original vision, not the source of it. AI tools used: NotebookLM, Ludwig.guru.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BSAPBacteroidales-specific antimicrobial proteins
CCCcholangiocarcinoma
CSVDcerebral small vessel disease
DETCdendritic epidermal T cells
NGSNext-generation sequencing

List of Contributions

  • Plaza-Díaz, J.; Fernández, M.F.; García, F.; Chueca, N.; Fontana, L.; Álvarez-Mercado, A.I. Comparison of Three DNA Isolation Methods and Two Sequencing Techniques for the Study of the Human Microbiota. Life 2025, 15, 599.
  • Koo, H.; Morrow, C.D. Bacteroidales-Specific Antimicrobial Genes Can Influence the Selection of the Dominant Fecal Strain of Bacteroides vulgatus and Bacteroides uniformis from the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbial Community. Life 2024, 14, 555.
  • Ferček, I.; Ozretić, P.; Tambić-Andrašević, A.; Trajanoski, S.; Ćesić, D.; Jelić, M.; Geber, G.; Žaja, O.; Paić, J.; Lugović-Mihić, L.; Civljak, R. Comparison of the Skin Microbiota in the Periocular Region between Patients with Inflammatory Skin Diseases and Healthy Participants: A Preliminary Study. Life 2024, 14, 1091.
  • Chung, J.; Lee, J.-C.; Oh, H.; Kim, Y.; Lim, S.; Lee, C.; Shim, Y.-G.; Bang, E.-C.; Baek, J.H. Gut Microbiota Regulates the Homeostasis of Dendritic Epidermal T Cells. Life 2024, 14, 1695.
  • Alswat, A.S. The Influence of the Gut Microbiota on Host Health: A Focus on the Gut–Lung Axis and Therapeutic Approaches. Life 2024, 14, 1279.
  • Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Park, J.-S. Beyond the Bile: Exploring the Microbiome and Metabolites in Cholangiocarcinoma. Life 2024, 14, 698.
  • Nakhal, M.M.; Yassin, L.K.; Alyaqoubi, R.; Saeed, S.; Alderei, A.; Alhammadi, A.; Alshehhi, M.; Almehairbi, A.; Al Houqani, S.; BaniYas, S.; Qanadilo, H.; Ali, B.R.; Shehab, S.; Statsenko, Y.; Meribout, S., Sadek, B.; Akour, A., Hamad, M.I.K. The Microbiota– Gut–Brain Axis and Neurological Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Life 2024, 14, 1234.
  • Che Mohd Nassir, C.M.N.; Che Ramli, M.D.; Mohamad Ghazali, M.; Jaffer, U.; Abdul Hamid, H.; Mehat, M.Z.; Hein, Z.M. The Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Key Mechanisms Driving Glymphopathy and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Life 2025, 15, 3.
  • Marano, G.; Rossi, S.; Sfratta, G.; Traversi, G.; Lisci, F.M.; Anesini, M.B.; Pola, R.; Gasbarrini, A.; Gaetani, E.; Mazza, M. Gut Microbiota: A New Challenge in Mood Disorder Research. Life 2025, 15, 593.
  • Zhong, B.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, L.;Yang, G.; Gao, Y.; Li, F.; Li, S. Anticancer Effects of Weizmannia coagulans MZY531 Postbiotics in CT26 Colorectal Tumor-Bearing Mice by Regulating Apoptosis and Autophagy. Life 2024, 14, 1334.
  • Ghannoum, M.A.; Elshaer, M.; Al-Shakhshir, H.; Retuerto, M.; McCormick, T.S. A Probiotic Amylase Blend Positively Impacts Gut Microbiota Modulation in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Life 2024, 14, 824.
  • Ko, G.-P.; Jo, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.S.; Boo, K.-H.; Kim, C.S. Enterotype-Specific Effects of Red Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) Powder and Betanin on Human Gut Microbiota: A Preliminary Study Based on In Vitro Fecal Fermentation Model. Life 2024, 14, 1391.
  • Hizo, G.H.; Rampelotto, P.H. The Impact of Probiotic Bifidobacterium on Liver Diseases and the Microbiota. Life 2024, 14, 239.
  • Kaçar Mutlutürk, Ü.; Çiçek, B.; Cengiz, G. The Effect of the Ideal Food Pyramid on Gut Microbiota in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Life 2025, 15, 463.

References

  1. Adak, A.; Khan, M.R. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hou, K.; Wu, Z.X.; Chen, X.Y.; Wang, J.Q.; Zhang, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, D.; Koya, J.B.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shabani, M.; Ghoshehy, A.; Mottaghi, A.M.; Chegini, Z.; Kerami, A.; Shariati, A.; Taati Moghadam, M. The relationship between gut microbiome and human diseases: Mechanisms, predisposing factors and potential intervention. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1516010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, R.; Yi, N.; Zhi, D.; Eipers, P.; Goldsmith, K.T.; Dixon, P.; Crossman, D.K.; Crowley, M.R.; Lefkowitz, E.J.; Rodriguez, J.M.; et al. Identification of donor microbe species that colonize and persist long term in the recipient after fecal transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2017, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Paller, A.S.; Kong, H.H.; Seed, P.; Naik, S.; Scharschmidt, T.C.; Gallo, R.L.; Luger, T.; Irvine, A.D. The microbiome in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 143, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, X.E.; Zheng, P.; Ye, S.Z.; Ma, X.; Liu, E.; Pang, Y.B.; He, Q.Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Li, W.Q.; Zeng, J.H.; et al. Microbiome: Role in Inflammatory Skin Diseases. J. Inflamm. Res. 2024, 17, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, Z.; Wang, R.; Li, M.; Lu, M. Current insights and trends in atopic dermatitis and microbiota interactions: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1613315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dumas, A.; Bernard, L.; Poquet, Y.; Lugo-Villarino, G.; Neyrolles, O. The Role of the Lung Microbiota and the Gut–Lung Axis in Respiratory Infectious Diseases. Cell Microbiol. 2018, 20, e12966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, L.; Cai, Y.; Garssen, J.; Henricks, P.A.J.; Folkerts, G.; Braber, S. The Bidirectional Gut-Lung Axis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2023, 207, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lathrop, S.K.; Bloom, S.M.; Rao, S.M.; Nutsch, K.; Lio, C.W.; Santacruz, N.; Peterson, D.A.; Stappenbeck, T.S.; Hsieh, C.S. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature 2011, 478, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Grigor’eva, I.N.; Romanova, T.I. Gallstone Disease and Microbiome. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lee, J.; Park, J.-S.; Bae, J.; Lee, S.; Hwang, Y. Bile Microbiome in Patients with Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones and Correlation with the Duodenal Microbiome. Life 2022, 12, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cryan, J.F.; O’Riordan, K.J.; Cowan, C.S.M.; Sandhu, K.V.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Boehme, M.; Codagnone, M.G.; Cussotto, S.; Fulling, C.; Golubeva, A.V.; et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Galica, A.N.; Galica, R.; Dumitrașcu, D.L. Diet, fibers, and probiotics for irritable bowel syndrome. J. Med. Life 2022, 15, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jach, M.E.; Serefko, A.; Szopa, A.; Sajnaga, E.; Golczyk, H.; Santos, L.S.; Borowicz-Reutt, K.; Sieniawska, E. The Role of Probiotics and Their Metabolites in the Treatment of Depression. Molecules 2023, 28, 3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vinderola, G.; Sanders, M.E.; Salminen, S. The Concept of Postbiotics. Foods 2022, 11, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarmento, A.; Simões, C.D. Microbiota in Health and Disease. Life 2025, 15, 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15091374

AMA Style

Sarmento A, Simões CD. Microbiota in Health and Disease. Life. 2025; 15(9):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15091374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarmento, Amélia, and Catarina D. Simões. 2025. "Microbiota in Health and Disease" Life 15, no. 9: 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15091374

APA Style

Sarmento, A., & Simões, C. D. (2025). Microbiota in Health and Disease. Life, 15(9), 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15091374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop