Next Article in Journal
The Immunotherapeutic Role of Type I and III Interferons in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers
Next Article in Special Issue
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Antigens Elicit a Strong IgG4 Response in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Exacerbate Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin Effects in Primary Dysmenorrhea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/life13061309
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Microorganisms in the Etiopathogenesis of Demyelinating Diseases

by
Jessica Frau
1,*,
Giancarlo Coghe
1,
Lorena Lorefice
1,
Giuseppe Fenu
2 and
Eleonora Cocco
1,3
1
Multiple Sclerosis Centre, ASL Cagliari, 09126 Cagliari, Italy
2
Neurologia, ARNAS G. Brotzu, 09047 Selargius, Italy
3
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(6), 1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061309
Submission received: 1 May 2023 / Revised: 28 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 1 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Microorganism in the Etiopathogenesis of Demyelinating Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) are inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) with a multifactorial aetiology. Environmental factors are important for their development and microorganisms could play a determining role. They can directly damage the CNS, but their interaction with the immune system is even more important. The possible mechanisms involved include molecular mimicry, epitope spreading, bystander activation and the dual cell receptor theory. The role of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in MS has been definitely established, since being seropositive is a necessary condition for the onset of MS. EBV interacts with genetic and environmental factors, such as low levels of vitamin D and human endogenous retrovirus (HERV), another microorganism implicated in the disease. Many cases of onset or exacerbation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) have been described after infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, EBV and human immunodeficiency virus; however, no definite association with a virus has been found. A possible role has been suggested for Helicobacter pylori, in particular in individuals with aquaporin 4 antibodies. The onset of MOGAD could occur after an infection, mainly in the monophasic course of the disease. A role for the HERV in MOGAD has been hypothesized. In this review, we examined the current understanding of the involvement of infectious factors in MS, NMO and MOGAD. Our objective was to elucidate the roles of each microorganism in initiating the diseases and influencing their clinical progression. We aimed to discuss both the infectious factors that have a well-established role and those that have yielded conflicting results across various studies.

1. Introduction

Demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) are a group of overlapping syndromes characterized by immune-mediated inflammation of the brain and spinal cord. They mainly affect young adult people and their frequency varies worldwide, with multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) being the most important [1].
The cause of demyelinating diseases is unknown, but an interaction between genetics and the environment has been established, especially for MS. Among the environmental factors, the main risk factors for MS are vitamin D deficiency, obesity, smoking and infections [2].
Knowledge of the importance of infectious agents in the triggering of autoimmunity is very old, with MS having been postulated to be triggered by a microorganism as early as 1900 [3].
The role of persistent slow infections in MS has been suspected since 1975 when elevated titers of antibodies against rubeola, vaccinia and measles viruses were found in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with MS, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis and NMOSD [4].
In some autoimmune diseases such as MS and type 1 diabetes, infections during pregnancy have also been observed to play a role. In fact, patients with MS exhibit a month of birth seasonality that is different from that of healthy controls, suggesting that perinatal infections could trigger autoimmunity [5,6]. Two mechanisms have been postulated to explain the involvement of the fetus during the viral infection affecting the mother. In the first one, the inflammatory immune response caused by the viral infection in the mother is followed by a transmission of cytokines to the fetus. Alternatively, the viruses could be transmitted directly from the mother to the fetus [7]. On the contrary, there is a possibility of other environmental factors playing a role in the observed impact of the birth season. Specifically, studies have revealed that in the northern hemisphere, this impact correlates with latitude- and climate-related variables such as sunshine duration. Additionally, inadequate levels of vitamin D in the mother may increase the risk of MS in the infant and these levels are closely linked to sun exposure, which varies seasonally [8].
Viruses can damage the infected organism and trigger autoimmunity in different pathways [9].
The most plausible mechanism that could explain the role of infections in the triggering of autoimmunity is molecular mimicry, which consists of a cross-reaction between self and nonself epitopes, leading to their presentation by antigen-presenting cells to autoreactive CD4+ T cells [10,11].
Other pathways include direct neural toxicity, which is not mediated by inflammation [9]; bystander activation, which is an abnormal immune activation after tissue damage involving the exposure of normally hidden autoantigens and the production of other autoreactive T cells [10]; and epitope spreading, which consists of the release of myelin fragments after their disruption in the inflammatory environment, resulting in the exposure of additional epitopes [12,13]. Another mechanism is known as “dual T-cell receptors” and involves T cells that carry two different receptors with specificity for myelin and for microorganism epitopes, respectively [13] (Figure 1).
Even if viruses are considered as the microorganisms that are more implicated in the pathogenesis of demyelinating diseases, it has recently been suggested that fungi also play a role. Considering that CD4+ T cells are indispensable to protecting the organism against fungal infections, an overactivation of these immune cells could potentially lead to autoimmunity [14].
Many factors related to infection have been implicated in demyelinating diseases, some of which have only been described in a few populations [9,15,16,17].
In this review, our aim was to comprehensively discuss the role of infectious factors in MS, NMOSD and MOGAD individually. We conducted thorough research on each microorganism, presenting the current knowledge and hypotheses regarding their association with the onset and clinical course of these three diseases. We emphasized instances where the role of infections is well-established, backed by robust studies, as well as situations where different studies have yielded conflicting results. Additionally, we explored the potential involvement of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in managing the infection, particularly focusing on infectious factors strongly associated with MS.

2. MS

MS is the most common demyelinating disease of the CNS and its pathogenesis is multifactorial. Indeed, although a genetic predisposition is required, this in itself is not a sufficient condition for its occurrence. Many environmental factors, particularly acting during the first decades of life, are determinants of disease development, among which microorganisms play an important role [18,19]. MS is therefore a demyelinating disease for which strong evidence of the role of infections in its aetiopathogenesis is available. Several viruses, including rabies, coronavirus, measles, torque teno virus, herpes viruses and parainfluenza have been hypothesized to be important in MS [20].
The microorganism with the strongest association with MS is the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) [21,22], but it is possible that more than one agent may be involved [23]. Moreover, viruses can act as triggers or cofactors and strict interactions have been described among several microorganisms and between them and other environmental and genetic factors, such as among EBV, vitamin D receptor and HERV expression [9,24] (Figure 2).
Table 1 shows a selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in MS.

2.1. EBV

The presence of higher titers of antibodies against EBV in patients with MS compared to healthy controls has been understood since the eighties [25,26,27].
This virus is present in almost all patients with MS [28] and the risk of developing the disease is significantly higher if the patient has experienced a previous mononucleosis infection [91].
Recently, the role of EBV in the disease has been definitely established by a large cohort study involving more than 10 million military personnel who have been monitored for years [21]. The authors found EBV seropositivity in all but one of the 801 cases of MS diagnosed during follow-up and the risk of developing the disease for the infected persons was 32-fold higher compared to that for seronegative cases. Other viruses were not implicated in MS in this study. Interestingly, a cause-and-effect relationship between EBV and MS has been demonstrated by the presence in MS patients of high levels of neurofilament light chains, a serum biomarker of neurodegeneration, only after but never before EBV infection. This study definitively established that individuals that are seronegative for EBV have a low risk of developing MS [21]. In EBV-infected individuals, however, antibody titers against EBV are strong prognostic markers of MS onset [29].
Cross-reactivity with myelin basic protein has been detected in the serum of patients with antibodies against epitopes from EBV proteins such as Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 and DNA polymerase [30,31].
Despite the detection of EBV-specific oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in the CSF and the finding that OCBs from patients with MS bind to specific EBV proteins [32,33,34], the actual presence of the virus in the CNS of these patients has not been well established and the studies have yielded contradicting results [92].
The onset of MS may occur decades after the primary EBV infection [35,36]. This timeframe reflects the prodromal phase of MS [93] and it is possible that, during this period, EBV may interact with the immune system of the host through affinity maturation and clonal expansion of B cells, expansion of EBV-infected B cell reservoirs and epitope spreading, thus contributing to MS development [21].
It has been hypothesized that EBV could act through molecular mimicry, with B cells losing the episomic EBV DNA after replication but retaining the “forbidden” epitope recognition [94]. According to another theory, EBV could disrupt the blood–brain barrier during primary infection, allowing autoimmune cells to enter the CNS and leading to local inflammation [95]. The possibility of a persistent EBV infection in the CNS with activation of the immune response and subsequent CNS tissue damage is less probable [37,96]. However, B cells activated by EBV are preferentially recruited to the CNS and submucosal secondary lymphoid organs, thus stimulating autoimmune T cells, either in the CNS or in intestinal lymphoid organs [97]. After the initial damage in the CNS, autoantibodies produced by the infected B cells could target the myelin sheath and cause the release of myelin fragments, which in turn could stimulate the T cells to continue the degradation process [98].
Moreover, EBV could activate the human endogenous retrovirus (HERV), which has pro-inflammatory and neurotoxic properties [99].
The genetic factors involved in EBV control are becoming increasingly important. The main hypothesis regarding the role of EBV as a “key pathogenic event” in MS involves an altered balance between the virus and the immune system of the host in genetically predisposed individuals [100]. Indeed, the control of EBV within the human body is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. These factors, to some extent, are associated with age and sex and can influence the immune response against EBV [100].
It has been suggested that mutations in EBNA-2 could influence the host response and the risk of developing MS [38]. Some major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles predisposing to MS function as coreceptors for EBV entry into B cells [39], but other MS loci are also involved in the response to EBNA-2 [100] and there is an interaction between EBNA-1 antibody titers and HLA-DRB1*1501 [101]. It has been calculated that the risk of MS is more than 20-fold higher if HLA-DRB1*1501 is present in combination with high titers of EBNA-1 antibodies [40]. Furthermore, recent studies have observed that EBV, through the utilization of specific virulence factors, may possess the ability to manipulate MS susceptibility genes via epigenetic regulation [102].
Another piece of evidence is the presence of a complex interaction between EBV and environmental factors associated with MS, such as low vitamin D levels, obesity in childhood and adolescence and smoking. Their role in the modulation of MS risk after EBV infection has been hypothesized [21]. For example, there is an overlap between the receptor-binding sites of EBNA-2 and vitamin D, which suggests that the role of EBV in the increase in MS risk could be modulated by vitamin D deficiency. Furthermore, vitamin D could inhibit EBV infection via apoptosis and EBV-EBNA-3 could hamper the function of the vitamin D receptor [41].
Although the importance of EBV in the induction of MS is clear, there is no agreement about its role in the course of the disease or in the conversion from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to MS [103]. Some studies have agreed on the correlation between EBNA-1 antibody titers and radiological disease activity [42,43].
Nevertheless, there is evidence of DMTs, such as interferon beta, teriflunomide and ocrelizumab, playing a role in decreasing the immune response to EBV or inhibiting its replication in “in vitro” studies [44,45]. Therefore, the effectiveness of DMTs could be partly attributed to their capacity to modify the interaction between EBV and the immune system of the host.
In addition, new drugs such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors suppress the activation of EBV lytic infection [104], while others still being developed represent EBV-specific T cell immunotherapy aiming to reinforce the immune control of this virus that is deficient in patients with MS [100].
Hence, as our understanding of the role of EBV in terms of its interaction with the immune system and its impact on the clinical course continues to expand, clinical studies focusing on targeting EBV are currently underway [105].
A phase I trial has commenced, employing autologous EBV-specific T cell therapy, in patients with progressive MS and CIS, demonstrating promising results in terms of safety and efficacy in reducing disability. Additionally, studies on the noncyclic nucleoside analogue tenofovir alafenamide have revealed its ability to inhibit EBV DNA polymerase. Based on these findings, a clinical trial is currently underway to assess the use of this drug as an add-on to ocrelizumab, evaluating its efficacy in alleviating MS symptoms and promoting neuroprotection [102].
Owing to the primary role of EBV in the pathogenesis of MS, new prophylactic vaccines against the virus are being tested in healthy young adults [106]. The main aim of the vaccines should be to prevent EBV infection, but a vaccine that controls the immune response to EBV could also reduce the frequency of MS. On the other hand, research on vaccines is complicated due to potential adverse events such as an aberrant immune response that could trigger autoimmunity or transient protection against EBV that could only delay the infection and the onset of MS [21].

2.2. HERV

HERV are a class of retroviruses incorporated in the human genome millions of years ago and they represent up to 8% of the human genome. HERV are classified into various classes and families, with each family being designated by appending a letter after the acronym “HERV”. The letter corresponds to the transfer RNA specificity of the primer-binding site. The activation of the K, H and W types by a variety of different stimuli (i.e., infection with EBV, human herpes virus-6 and other viruses) could trigger demyelination in MS [107,108,109]. It is estimated that 8% of the entire human genome is constituted by some types of HERV, which normally have a regulatory function for human gene expression [110]. Nevertheless, they are abnormally expressed in some types of cancers and autoimmune diseases [20].
HERV-W is the type most closely implicated in MS pathogenesis and its envelope protein has been detected in the serum, brain, perivascular infiltrates and macrophages of patients with MS [46,47,48]. Moreover, HERV mRNA has been found in the brain lesions, CSF and blood cells of individuals with MS [49,50]. It has been demonstrated that the HERV-W envelope can stimulate microglia to damage myelinated axons, activate monocytes and endothelial cells and drive the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines responsible for demyelination and neurodegeneration [24,48].
HERV-W envelope epitopes are expressed on activated B cells and monocytes in individuals with MS, suggesting cross-reactivity through molecular mimicry [51,53]. The HERV-W envelope protein can be colocalized with oligodendrocyte progenitors in normal white matter, resulting in disrupted myelin repair, abnormal demyelination and development of MS [54].
Other HERV types, such as HERV-K and -H, have been reported to be associated with MS. In particular, the levels of some HERV-K gag genes are increased in mononuclear cells and in the brains of individuals with MS [52,111]. The HERV-H envelope and gag proteins have been reported to be present in the serum of MS patients [55] and when patients with active disease were compared to those with inactive MS and with healthy controls, both the HERV-H envelope protein and an HERV-H single nucleotide polymorphisms were found only in immune blood cells derived from the first group [51,52].
HERV-W appears to be implicated not only in the pathogenesis of MS, but also in its clinical course. Indeed, patients with a high level of disability or those in phases of high disease activity have more active loci for the HERV-W envelope compared to other patients with MS and to healthy controls [20].
It has been hypothesized that HERV-W is activated by EBV during infectious mononucleosis, thereby acting as an effector in MS pathogenesis [56]. EBV appears to induce the expression of some HERV genes in both patients with MS and in healthy controls [50,57]. HERV may activate the host immune response by acting as a superantigen or a toll-like receptor agonist [54,112].
In addition, other viruses such as varicella-zoster (VZV), herpes simplex-1 and herpes virus-6 could activate HERV [24].
An inverse correlation between HERV-W DNA and vitamin D levels has been reported in individuals with MS, suggesting a potential interaction between HERV and vitamin D [58]. Moreover, high levels of vitamin D could inhibit HERV transactivation [113]. Thus, both EBV and vitamin D levels could modify HERV expression and HERV could be considered the missing link between these factors and the induction of inflammation that takes place in MS [24].
Interestingly, as a further suggestion regarding the role of HERV in MS, DMTs such as interferon beta, natalizumab, rituximab and fingolimod may decrease the expression of HERV-W [59,60,114]. Additionally, a new drug tested in a phase II clinical trial for MS, known as GNbCA1, has been shown to block the HERV-W-dependent inflammatory cascade [61,62].

2.3. Human Herpes Virus (HHV)

Higher titers of antibodies against herpes simplex virus-2 have been reported in patients with MS, whereas herpes simplex virus-1 has been reported in pediatric cases and in CIS, but not in adult MS [115].
The HHV subtype with stronger evidence of implication in MS is HHV-6. HHV-6 infects the majority of the population before one year of age and comprises two species: HHV-6A and HHV-6B [116]. The detection of HHV-6 DNA in MS lesions, CSF and blood cells, the observation of high antibody titers in patients with MS and the identification of OCB specificity against HHV-6 have suggested an association between infection with this microorganism and the disease [63,64].
Although other studies have reported no association between HHV-6 and MS risk [117], a clear difference between patients with MS and healthy controls has been established after a thorough metanalysis in terms of anti-HHV-6 antibody titers and HHV-6 mRNA and DNA [118]. Furthermore, the antibody titer was associated with an enhanced risk of relapse [65].
Among the two subtypes, HHV-6A is more neurotrophic and it has been observed that the increased cellular immune response and increased HHV-6 DNA detected in the serum and CSF of patients with MS corresponds to subtype A and not B [66,67].
Increased anti-HHV-6 IgM has been reported in the early stages of the disease, suggesting an important role for the virus during this phase [119].
HHV-6 stimulates the microglia to produce pro-inflammatory molecules and activates latent EBV in B cells [9,120]. However, it is unclear how the virus induces these autoimmune processes. One of the hypotheses involves molecular mimicry through cross-reactivity with basic myelin proteins [68]. Other pathogenic pathways include incorporation into the host cell leading to the expression of host proteins in the virus envelope, direct infection of the CNS with primary local injury and triggering of the inflammation cascade [119,121].
An interaction with genetic factors has also been reported for HHV-6. In particular, the presence of HLA DRB1*1501 in combination with high anti-HHV-6 antibody titers and with the absence of the protective allele HLA-A*0201 increases the risk of MS [69]. Moreover, environmental risk factors for MS, such as low vitamin D levels, low UV irradiation, smoking and EBV infection, increase the risk of MS in individuals with high titers of anti-HHV-6A antibodies [70,71]. In contrast, there is an inverse interaction with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection: individuals with low levels of anti-CMV antibodies and high titers of anti-EBV and anti-HHV-6A antibodies have a 15-fold higher risk of developing MS compared to those with high anti-CMV and low anti-EBV and anti-HHV-6A antibody levels [89].

2.4. Gut Microbiota

There is clear evidence of a link between the gut microbiota and MS, with both bacteria and fungi playing an important role [122,123]. Different microorganisms comprise the gut microbiota, with Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria representing more than 97% of it [124]. Its composition is influenced by several internal and external factors, including diet, lifestyle and physical activity [125]. Disruption in the normal composition of gut microbiota, known as “dysbiosis”, has been related to many diseases [126]. The complex interplay between the CNS and the gut has led to the concept of the “gut-brain axis” and it has been noted that the development of the immune system from birth depends on the composition of the gut microbiota [127]. The gut microbiota of individuals with MS has some peculiarities compared to that of healthy individuals, such as an increased abundance of Akkermansia, Ruminococcus, Blautia and Bifidobacterium, while other microorganisms such as Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Prevotella and Lactobacillus are less represented [128]. The first group regulates the immune response mediated by T cells, promoting a pro-inflammatory and autoimmune environment both in vivo and in vitro. In contrast, the bacterial species that are less abundant in the gut of patients with MS have anti-inflammatory properties [72].
There is evidence of the amelioration of MS symptoms through the manipulation of the gut microbiota composition with probiotic supplementation, the use of antibiotics or changes in dietary habits. Moreover, some pilot studies have confirmed the promising role of microbiota transplantation [129].
It has recently been suggested that both DMTs and vitamin D may have an impact on the gut microbiota [130]. Indeed, dimethylfumarate can promote an increase in Bacteroides and a decrease in two clostridial families, whereas interferon beta can cause an increase in Prevotella [73,74].
Other studies have explored the effect of high-efficacy DMTs such as natalizumab, anti-CD20 antibodies and fingolimod and changes in the gut microbiota composition have been found in patients that were treated with these drugs [75]. However, it is not clear whether these changes in the composition of the microbiota are associated with altered function, or whether they could affect the efficacy of DMTs [131].

2.5. Fungi

Recent studies have shown that fungi may play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS [14] and the finding that genes involved in innate immunity are associated with the disease suggests a link between MS and dysregulation of the innate immune system [18].
Candida albicans is the fungus most closely associated with MS according to the available evidence. Candida infection is more frequent in MS patients compared to healthy individuals and correlates with disease severity. Antibodies against Candida have also been found in the CSF of individuals with MS [77,78,79]. This association may be the result of molecular mimicry, with memory B cells recognizing both Candida and CNS epitopes [17]. It has been hypothesized that the higher prevalence of MS among women could be partially explained by the higher titers of antibodies against Candida present in healthy women compared to men [132].
Another fungus isolated from the majority of individuals with MS is Trichosporon mucoid, while both Aspergillus and Saccharomyces have been shown to be increased in the gut microbiota of MS patients compared to healthy controls [76,77].
Fungal toxins could have a direct role in the development of the disease by damaging oligodendrocytes and astrocytes, but the peripheral action of fungi on the immune system may also make a contribution [14,133].
Notably, T helper 17 cells play a crucial role in MS pathogenesis and they are also important for antifungal immunity [134,135]. Candida albicans mannoproteins promote the production of interleukin 17 (IL-17) and even a low fungal load inside the CNS can trigger high levels of a T helper-17-mediated immune response, thus provoking an important increase in IL-17 [136,137]. Another finding suggesting the role of fungi inside the CNS in the development of MS is the presence of high levels of the antimicrobial protein calproctectin in the CSF during relapses [80]. The effectiveness of antifungal therapy in MS remains unclear, but in a study from more than 40 years ago, some improvement in MS symptoms was observed in a few patients after treatment with antifungal drugs [81]. Currently, one of the drugs used in clinical practice to treat MS (dimethylfumarate) is also a fungicide [17].

2.6. Mycobacterium avium Subspecies Paratuberculosis (MAP)

To date, this microorganism has been associated with MS only in Sardinia and Japan [82,84]. In a large cohort of Sardinian MS patients, a significantly higher frequency of anti-MAP antibodies and MAP DNA was observed compared to healthy controls [82,83]. Moreover, specific MAP antigens that are homologous with MS-related proteins have been described, suggesting that molecular mimicry and the ability to enhance the immune response are the main pathogenic mechanisms linking MAP to MS development [31,85,86,138].
After the study on the Sardinian cohort, a higher response against MAP was observed in a cohort of Japanese MS patients compared to healthy controls [84]. The prevalence of anti-MAP antibodies in the Sardinian and Japanese cohorts was quite similar [16]. Moreover, the two cohorts had a rare genetic factor in common (HLA-DRB1 04*05), which predisposed them to develop MS symptoms [84].
MAP infection can enhance the risk of MS if other factors, such as genetic predisposition, are present [15]. Nevertheless, no specific association between the predisposing haplotypes and MAP positivity was found in the Sardinian population. On the other hand, lower titers of anti-MAP antibodies have been detected in patients carrying at least one protective haplotype [87].
It has been suggested that the beneficial effects of the Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) vaccine in MS patients are derived from MAP mitigation [139]. On the other hand, the vaccine should prevent neuroinflammation, contrasting the low exposure to microbes and other pro-inflammatory changes in lifestyle that have occurred in recent decades [140].
This vaccine has been used since 1950 to prevent allergic encephalomyelitis [140]. It has also been tested in MS and CIS patients and it was shown to decrease disease activity assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, as well as to lower the risk of conversion from CIS to clinically defined MS [141,142,143]. More recently, this vaccine has also been proposed as a therapeutic agent against radiologically isolated syndrome and a phase II study is ongoing.

2.7. CMV

The active role of CMV in the pathogenesis of MS has been hypothesized [88] and it has been clearly established that it has a protective effect against the disease [22,26,65,90]. This may be related to the capacity of CMV to enhance the immune control of EBV infection, thus reducing the risk of MS development [144].

3. NMOSD

NMOSD designates a group of demyelinating syndromes characterized by specific clinical and radiological findings in addition to the presence of anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies in 80–90% of the patients [145]. The prevalence of the disease is increasing, probably because of changes in environmental factors such as the increased use of antibiotics and improvements in hygiene conditions [146].
NMO pathogenesis involves both genetic and environmental factors; however, clear evidence is lacking at the moment. It is likely that factors in the environment trigger the onset of the disease in genetically predisposed individuals [147].
The evidence regarding the role of infections in NMO is not as strong as that available for MS due to the dearth of experimental data, which in turn may be the result of the low prevalence of the disease and the small sample size of the studies. Nevertheless, several infectious agents have been described as potential triggers for disease onset or exacerbation, including CMV, VZV, EBV, hepatitis A virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 and dengue virus [148,149]. It has been reported in several cases that the onset of NMO occurs after a viral infection, but the frequency of previous infection is highly variable among different studies, ranging from 15% to 50% [149,150,151].
An analysis of cases of NMOSD reported after infection between 1975 and 2009 showed a high frequency of monophasic course and poor prognosis compared to cases without previous infection [152]. Koga et al. reported a short disease history and prevalence of acute myelitis without optic neuritis in patients with a previous acute infection [149].
It is possible that viral infection may be able to increase blood–brain barrier permeability, thus allowing the entry of autoantibodies into the CNS [149]. Nevertheless, as previously described in the case of MS, viruses trigger autoimmunity through molecular mimicry, bystander activation and/or antigen spreading [153].
The “hygiene hypothesis” has been advanced in support of the role of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of NMOSD. Indeed, daycare attendance has been associated with a low risk of NMOSD, whereas caesarean delivery doubles the risk compared to natural birth [154].
In Table 2, a selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in NMOSD is shown.

3.1. Tuberculosis (TB)

Many cases of NMO have been reported after or during active TB, in particular with pulmonary involvement [155,158,160]. Notably, Rafai et al. reported on two patients with NMOSD, each presenting distinct clinical observations. In one case, the diagnosis of pulmonary TB closely preceded the onset of NMOSD, whereas in the other patient, neurological symptoms of NMOSD were observed prior to the detection of pulmonary TB positivity in the sputum [158]. An additional remarkable case involved a patient who consistently experienced NMOSD relapses following episodes of active pulmonary TB [155]. Furthermore, among a cohort of Brazilian patients, a history of previous pulmonary TB was identified in 5 out of 24 individuals diagnosed with NMOSD [160].
In a case-control study, a higher frequency of pulmonary TB was observed in patients with NMOSD compared to healthy controls and a close temporal association (with a median of four weeks) was observed between the two diagnoses [157]. However, this finding was not confirmed in a different population [156].
Supporting the role of TB in NMO is the observation of an improvement in neurological symptoms after TB treatment in a cohort of patients with NMOSD who were unresponsive to steroids [159].

3.2. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)

Contradictory results have been reported in studies regarding the prevalence of this microorganism in patients with NMO.
When AQP4-positive and AQP4-negative NMOSD patients were compared, higher titers of antibodies against H. pylori were observed only in the former group [161]. In contrast, another study evaluating patients with NMO found high levels of antibodies against H. pylori in both AQP4-positive and AQP4-negative patients when compared to patients with MS and to healthy controls, although the stronger association was with the AQP4-positive group [162]. In another cohort, a higher prevalence of H. pylori infection was described in AQP4-positive compared to AQP4-negative patients [163]. Finally, a comparison between AQP4-negative NMOSD patients and healthy controls did not reveal any difference in terms of the frequency of H. pylori infection [164]. Considered together, these findings suggest a probable role for H. pylori in AQP4-positive patients and a weak association in the case of AQP4-negative patients.
It is possible that the involvement of this bacterium in NMO triggering may not only be through the promotion of cell differentiation in T helper 1 and 17 cells but also through increasing the levels of cytokines and leukocytes and by stimulating mast cells to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines [174]. In contrast to the case of other microorganisms, molecular mimicry between H. pylori and self-antigens has not yet been demonstrated [147].

3.3. EBV

Data regarding the active role of EBV in NMOSD are not as robust as those in MS. However, the serum and CSF titers of anti-early antigen (EA) IgG antibodies are higher in patients with NMOSD than in those with MS or in healthy controls and they are positively associated with AQP4 levels [165]. The same study showed that anti-EA IgM levels were higher in NMO and MS patients compared to healthy controls, whereas antiviral capsid antigen and anti-EBNA IgG levels were higher in MS patients than in NMO patients or healthy individuals. It has been suggested that pro-inflammatory molecules produced early during EBV infection may exacerbate NMO. The high levels of anti-EA antibodies could indicate active viral replication in patients with NMO and the presence of these antibodies in the CSF is indicative of their local production [163]. When antibodies against other viruses, such as VZV, CMV and HSV, were measured in the serum of the same cohort, no difference between patients with MS and NMO was found [165].
Another study reported that NMO could be associated with the reactivation of EBV and not with a single episode of past infection [166].

3.4. HERV

Despite the limited number of studies, there is a general agreement regarding the negative association between antibodies against the HERV-W envelope and NMOSD, particularly in patients that are seropositive for AQP4 IgG. In fact, patients with NMOSD have lower levels of antibodies compared to patients with MS and to healthy individuals [167,168]. The different trends in the levels of these antibodies among patients with MS and NMOSD suggest that this could be used as a potential biomarker to improve discrimination between these two diseases [167].

3.5. Gut Microbiota

The roles of Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli in NMOSD have been suggested by their effect in T helper 17 and T regulatory cell balance [147]. Moreover, the presence of Clostridium perfringens has been found to be enhanced in individuals with NMO compared to that in patients with MS and healthy controls [169] and potential molecular mimicry between this microorganism and AQP4 has been suggested [170].

3.6. Fungi

There is no clear evidence supporting the role of fungi in NMO; however, Candida albicans has been reported to promote lymphocyte proliferation in these patients, suggesting a possible exacerbation of NMO after fungal infection [148].

3.7. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

A separate discussion needs to be conducted regarding HIV infection associated with NMOSD, an entity that has been recognized only relatively recently. To date, seven cases of HIV-NMOSD have been described worldwide, including both AQP4-positive and AQP4-negative patients and the peculiarity of this disease is the concomitant presence in the same patients of hypo- and hyperactivation of the immune system [171]. The mechanism of autoimmunity during HIV infection is unclear; however, autoimmune disease may occur when immune competence is still present around the time of seroconversion or during retroviral therapy. Nevertheless, in one of the reported cases, the onset of NMO was accompanied by a decrease in lymphocyte levels, suggesting the active role of the virus in the development of the disease [171]. It has been observed that HIV can trigger the immune system through the production of alloantigens, the stimulation of immune cells, the induction of interferon gamma production and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [171,172]. Moreover, viral products in the lymph nodes and gut mucosal tissue, as well as the presence of HIV DNA in target cells, may activate both the adaptive and the innate immune systems [172,175].
Other pathogenic mechanisms that may be involved are the stimulation of memory T cells by activated HIV T cells [176] and a direct infection by HIV with damage to astrocytes [173].

4. MOGAD

The term “MOGAD” encompasses a series of demyelinating diseases of the CNS characterized by optic neuritis, optic neuromyelitis, myelitis, brain/brainstem syndrome or acute disseminating encephalomyelitis (ADEM) together with the presence of anti-MOG IgG antibodies in serum [177,178].
It should be noted that the presence of anti-MOG antibodies can be transient and the disease is sometimes monophasic [179]. Moreover, low antibody titers have a lower predictive value and may indicate a false positive [180].
ADEM is the most common manifestation in the pediatric population and often occurs after infection with EBV, measles, influenza, enterovirus, coronavirus, herpes simplex and, rarely, Mycoplasma pneumoniae [181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190]. Recently, it has been observed that previous infection is more common during the monophasic course of the disease [191].
How microorganisms damage the CNS is still not clear. Both direct and immune-mediated mechanisms have been proposed [190].
A case of MOGAD characterized by longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis occurring three weeks after a streptococcal brain abscess has been described and anti-MOG antibodies were detected only transiently [192]. Similarly to what was observed in patients with MS and in contrast to what was observed in NMOSD patients, higher levels of antibodies against the HERV-W envelope were present in patients with MOGAD [168]. The most probable explanation involves molecular mimicry between epitopes of the HERV-W surface and oligodendrocytes, which is the main cell type implicated in both MS and MOGAD, but not in NMOSD. Indeed, cross-reactivity between MOG and some HERV-W envelope peptides has been reported [193].
A case of severe MOGAD after infection with the Jamestown Canyon virus has been described [194]. This virus can cause fever and meningoencephalitis. In this case, the infection probably triggered an immune response, as has been reported in other cases of MOGAD, especially when the presentation of the disease is ADEM-like in the pediatric population [195].
In Table 3, a selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in MOGAD is shown.

5. What about SARS-CoV-2?

In recent years, after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, several cases of post-infectious demyelinating diseases have been reported worldwide.
SARS-CoV-2 has direct neurotropism, but its DNA has never been found in the CSF of reported cases; thus, direct damage is not the probable mechanism [196]. On the other hand, the virus can cause an aberrant immune response, increasing the levels of cytokines and chemokines and inhibiting regulatory T cells [197,198]. This mechanism may be related to both cases of relapses and of new-onset demyelinating diseases.
A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate all demyelinating events described in the context of COVID-19 [196].
The cases described in the literature were as follows: 73 demyelinating events with considerable MS/CIS (10 new diagnoses) with a median time from COVID-19 to the onset of neurological symptoms of 13.5 days; 18 NMOSD events (10 new diagnoses) after a median of 11.5 days from COVID-19 diagnosis; and 28 MOGAD cases (27 new diagnoses) after a median of 6 days from the infection. It should be noted that, in some of the cases, neurological symptoms preceded COVID-19 and the relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the demyelinating disease should be considered doubtful when more than 6 weeks have elapsed between both events [192]. According to this review, the rates of relapse and onset of MS, NMO and MOGAD associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection are low [196].

6. Conclusions

Infectious factors, including viruses, fungi and bacteria, have the potential to act as potent triggers of autoimmunity, playing a significant role in the initiation of demyelinating diseases and their subsequent clinical manifestations.
Currently, it is clear that MS occurs in genetically predisposed individuals when particular environmental factors are present and that previous EBV infection has a determinant role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Indeed, the risk of MS is very low in patients that are EBV seronegative and increases after EBV infection, especially in genetically predisposed individuals. Among the remaining microorganisms that have been associated with the disease, HERV-W has the more important role and it has been considered the missing link between EBV and other environmental factors and the development of MS.
The evidence for the role of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of NMOSD is still not as clear and solid as that available for MS. However, several viruses and bacteria have been associated with the onset or exacerbation of the disease. It is likely that no specific infectious agents are directly responsible for the triggering of NMOSD symptoms. A more probable hypothesis is that any infection that derives in immune system imbalance, causing over-reactivity, production of self-reactive lymphocytes and AQP4, enhanced levels of cytokines and damage to the blood–brain barrier may be involved in the onset or exacerbation of NMOSD.
Little is known about the role of infections in MOGAD, mostly because of the rarity of the disease, its clinical variability and the lack of large study cohorts. Different infections preceding neurological symptoms have been described in case reports and case series, particularly in patients with a monophasic course, none of which have revealed any specific role for the microorganisms.
In conclusion, infectious agents play an important role in the triggering of demyelinating diseases, in particular through an interaction with the immune system. The clearest and best-defined role is that of EBV in the development of MS, which could in fact be considered as one of the rare, severe and long-term complications of EBV infection.

Author Contributions

J.F.: literature research and writing the paper, G.C.: literature research and writing the paper, L.L.: literature research and revision of the paper, G.F.: literature research and revision of the paper, E.C.: literature research and revision of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gomes, A.B.A.G.R.; Adoni, T. Differential diagnosis of demyelinating diseases: What’s new? Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2022, 80 (Suppl. 1), 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ascherio, A. Environmental factors in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2013, 13 (Suppl. 12), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moreira, M.A.; Tilbery, C.P.; Lana-Peixoto, M.A.; Mendes, M.F.; Kaimen-Maciel, D.R.; Callegaro, D. Historical aspects of multiple sclerosis. Rev. Neurol. 2002, 34, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Adams, J.M. Persistent or slow viral infections and related diseases. West J. Med. 1975, 122, 380–393. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewy, H.; Rotstein, A.; Kahana, E.; Marrosu, M.G.; Cocco, E.; Laron, Z. Juvenile multiple sclerosis similar to type I diabetes mellitus has a seasonality of month of birth which differs from that in the general population. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 21, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Willer, C.J.; Dyment, D.A.; Sadovnick, A.D.; Ebers, G.C. Maternal-offspring HLA-DRB1 compatibility in multiple sclerosis. Tissue Antigens 2005, 66, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Laron, Z.; Shulman, L.; Hampe, C.; Blumenfeld, O. Hypothesis: Viral infections of pregnant women may be early triggers of childhood type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune disease. J. Autoimmun. 2023, 135, 102977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pantavou, K.G.; Bagos, P.G. Season of birth and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis. J. Neurol. 2020, 267, 2815–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Donati, D. Viral infections and multiple sclerosis. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Models 2020, 32, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fujinami, R.S.; von Herrath, M.G.; Christen, U.; Whitton, J.L. Molecular mimicry, bystander activation, or viral persistence: Infections and autoimmune disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 80–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wucherpfennig, K.W.; Strominger, J.L. Molecular mimicry in T cell-mediated autoimmunity: Viral peptides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. Cell 1995, 80, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lehmann, P.V.; Forsthuber, T.; Miller, A.; Sercarz, E.E. Spreading of T-cell autoimmunity to cryptic determinants of an autoantigen. Nature 1992, 358, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cusick, M.F.; Libbey, J.E.; Fujinami, R.S. Multiple sclerosis: Autoimmunity and viruses. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2013, 25, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, C.; Jiang, M.L.; Jiang, R.; Pang, T.; Zhang, C.J. The roles of fungus in CNS autoimmune and neurodegeneration disorders. Front. Immunol. 2023, 13, 1077335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Frau, J.; Coghe, G.; Lorefice, L.; Fenu, G.; Cocco, E. Infections and Multiple Sclerosis: From the World to Sardinia, From Sardinia to the World. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 728677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cossu, D.; Yokoyama, K.; Nobutaka, N.; Sechi, L.A. From Sardinia to Japan: Update on the role of MAP in multiple sclerosis. Future Microbiol. 2019, 14, 643–646. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benito-León, J.; Laurence, M. The Role of Fungi in the Etiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility. Science 2019, 365, eaav7188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ascherio, A.; Munger, K.L. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: The role of infection. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 61, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nali, L.H.; Olival, G.S.; Montenegro, H.; da Silva, I.T.; Dias-Neto, E.; Naya, H.; Spangenberg, L.; Penalva-de-Oliveira, A.C.; Romano, C.M. Human endogenous retrovirus and multiple sclerosis: A review and transcriptome findings. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2022, 57, 103383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bjornevik, K.; Cortese, M.; Healy, B.C.; Kuhle, J.; Mina, M.J.; Leng, Y.; Elledge, S.J.; Niebuhr, D.W.; Scher, A.I.; Munger, K.L.; et al. Longitudinal analysis reveals high prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus associated with multiple sclerosis. Science. 2022, 375, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bjornevik, K.; Münz, C.; Cohen, J.I.; Ascherio, A. Epstein-Barr virus as a leading cause of multiple sclerosis: Mechanisms and implications. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2023, 19, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Steiner, I.; Sriram, S. The “one virus, one disease” model of multiple sclerosis is too constraining. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 62, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Latifi, T.; Zebardast, A.; Marashi, S.M. The role of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) in Multiple Sclerosis and the plausible interplay between HERVs, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and vitamin D. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2022, 57, 103318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sumaya, C.V.; Myers, L.W.; Ellison, G.W. Epstein-Barr virus antibodies in multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 1980, 37, 94–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bray, P.F.; Bloomer, L.C.; Salmon, V.C.; Bagley, M.H.; Larsen, P.D. Epstein-Barr virus infection and antibody synthesis in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 1983, 40, 406–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Larsen, P.D.; Bloomer, L.C.; Bray, P.F. Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen and viral capsid antigen antibody titers in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1985, 35, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pakpoor, J.; Ramagopalan, S.V. Epstein-Barr virus is a necessary causative agent in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: Yes. Mult. Scler. 2013, 19, 1690–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Munger, K.L.; Levin, L.I.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Falk, K.I.; Ascherio, A. Anti-Epstein-Barr virus antibodies as serological markers of multiple sclerosis: A prospective study among United States military personnel. Mult. Scler. 2011, 17, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jog, N.R.; McClain, M.T.; Heinlen, L.D.; Gross, T.; Towner, R.; Guthridge, J.M.; Axtell, R.C.; Pardo, G.; Harley, J.B.; James, J.A. Epstein Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) peptides recognized by adult multiple sclerosis patient sera induce neurologic symptoms in a murine model. J. Autoimmun. 2020, 106, 102332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mameli, G.; Cossu, D.; Cocco, E.; Masala, S.; Frau, J.; Marrosu, M.G.; Sechi, L.A. Epstein-Barr virus and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis peptides are cross recognized by anti-myelin basic protein antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 2014, 270, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cepok, S.; Zhou, D.; Srivastava, R.; Nessler, S.; Stei, S.; Büssow, K.; Sommer, N.; Hemmer, B. Identification of Epstein-Barr virus proteins as putative targets of the immune response in multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Z.; Kennedy, P.G.; Dupree, C.; Wang, M.; Lee, C.; Pointon, T.; Langford, T.D.; Graner, M.W.; Yu, X. Antibodies from Multiple Sclerosis Brain Identified Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 1 & 2 Epitopes which Are Recognized by Oligoclonal Bands. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2021, 16, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Lanz, T.V.; Brewer, R.C.; Ho, P.P.; Moon, J.S.; Jude, K.M.; Fernandez, D.; Fernandes, R.A.; Gomez, A.M.; Nadj, G.S.; Bartley, C.M.; et al. Clonally expanded B cells in multiple sclerosis bind EBV EBNA1 and GlialCAM. Nature 2022, 603, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. DeLorenze, G.N.; Munger, K.L.; Lennette, E.T.; Orentreich, N.; Vogelman, J.H.; Ascherio, A. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: Evidence of association from a prospective study with long-term follow-up. Arch. Neurol. 2006, 63, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nielsen, T.R.; Rostgaard, K.; Nielsen, N.M.; Koch-Henriksen, N.; Haahr, S.; Sørensen, P.S.; Hjalgrim, H. Multiple sclerosis after infectious mononucleosis. Arch. Neurol. 2007, 64, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Serafini, B.; Rosicarelli, B.; Franciotta, D.; Magliozzi, R.; Reynolds, R.; Cinque, P.; Andreoni, L.; Trivedi, P.; Salvetti, M.; Faggioni, A.; et al. Dysregulated Epstein-Barr virus infection in the multiple sclerosis brain. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2899–2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Keane, J.T.; Afrasiabi, A.; Schibeci, S.D.; Swaminathan, S.; Parnell, G.P.; Booth, D.R. The interaction of Epstein-Barr virus encoded transcription factor EBNA2 with multiple sclerosis risk loci is dependent on the risk genotype. EBioMedicine 2021, 71, 103572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Menegatti, J.; Schub, D.; Schäfer, M.; Grässer, F.A.; Ruprecht, K. HLA-DRB1*15:01 is a co-receptor for Epstein-Barr virus, linking genetic and environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2021, 51, 2348–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sundström, P.; Nyström, M.; Ruuth, K.; Lundgren, E. Antibodies to specific EBNA-1 domains and HLA DRB1*1501 interact as risk factors for multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2009, 215, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yenamandra, S.P.; Hellman, U.; Kempkes, B.; Darekar, S.D.; Petermann, S.; Sculley, T.; Klein, G.; Kashuba, E. Epstein-Barr virus encoded EBNA-3 binds to vitamin D receptor and blocks activation of its target genes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 4249–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Farrell, R.A.; Antony, D.; Wall, G.R.; Clark, D.A.; Fisniku, L.; Swanton, J.; Khaleeli, Z.; Schmierer, K.; Miller, D.H.; Giovannoni, G. Humoral immune response to EBV in multiple sclerosis is associated with disease activity on MRI. Neurology 2009, 73, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kvistad, S.; Myhr, K.M.; Holmøy, T.; Bakke, S.; Beiske, A.G.; Bjerve, K.S.; Hovdal, H.; Løken-Amsrud, K.I.; Lilleås, F.; Midgard, R.; et al. Antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus and MRI disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2014, 20, 1833–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pham, H.P.T.; Gupta, R.; Lindsey, J.W. The cellular immune response against Epstein-Barr virus decreases during ocrelizumab treatment. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2021, 56, 103282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bilger, A.; Plowshay, J.; Ma, S.; Nawandar, D.; Barlow, E.A.; Romero-Masters, J.C.; Bristol, J.A.; Li, Z.; Tsai, M.H.; Delecluse, H.J.; et al. Leflunomide/teriflunomide inhibit Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)- induced lymphoproliferative disease and lytic viral replication. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 44266–44280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Perron, H.; Germi, R.; Bernard, C.; Garcia-Montojo, M.; Deluen, C.; Farinelli, L.; Faucard, R.; Veas, F.; Stefas, I.; Fabriek, B.O.; et al. Human endogenous retrovirus type W envelope expression in blood and brain cells provides new insights into multiple sclerosis disease. Mult. Scler. 2012, 18, 1721–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. van Horssen, J.; van der Pol, S.; Nijland, P.; Amor, S.; Perron, H. Human endogenous retrovirus W in brain lesions: Rationale for targeted therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2016, 8, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Charvet, B.; Pierquin, J.; Brunel, J.; Gorter, R.; Quétard, C.; Horvat, B.; Amor, S.; Portoukalian, J.; Perron, H. Human Endogenous Retrovirus Type W Envelope from Multiple Sclerosis Demyelinating Lesions Shows Unique Solubility and Antigenic Characteristics. Virol. Sin. 2021, 36, 1006–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rasmussen, H.B.; Geny, C.; Deforges, L.; Perron, H.; Tourtelotte, W.; Heltberg, A.; Clausen, J. Expression of endogenous retroviruses in blood mononuclear cells and brain tissue from multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 1995, 1, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mameli, G.; Poddighe, L.; Mei, A.; Uleri, E.; Sotgiu, S.; Serra, C.; Manetti, R.; Dolei, A. Expression and activation by Epstein Barr virus of human endogenous retroviruses-W in blood cells and astrocytes: Inference for multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brudek, T.; Christensen, T.; Aagaard, L.; Petersen, T.; Hansen, H.J.; Møller-Larsen, A. B cells and monocytes from patients with active multiple sclerosis exhibit increased surface expression of both HERV-H Env and HERV-W Env, accompanied by increased seroreactivity. Retrovirology 2009, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Laska, M.J.; Brudek, T.; Nissen, K.K.; Christensen, T.; Møller-Larsen, A.; Petersen, T.; Nexø, B.A. Expression of HERV-Fc1, a human endogenous retrovirus, is increased in patients with active multiple sclerosis. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 3713–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ramasamy, R.; Joseph, B.; Whittall, T. Potential molecular mimicry between the human endogenous retrovirus W family envelope proteins and myelin proteins in multiple sclerosis. Immunol. Lett. 2017, 183, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Madeira, A.; Burgelin, I.; Perron, H.; Curtin, F.; Lang, A.B.; Faucard, R. MSRV envelope protein is a potent, endogenous and pathogenic agonist of human toll-like receptor 4: Relevance of GNbAC1 in multiple sclerosis treatment. J. Neuroimmunol. 2016, 291, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Christensen, T.; Dissing Sørensen, P.; Riemann, H.; Hansen, H.J.; Munch, M.; Haahr, S.; Møller-Larsen, A. Molecular characterization of HERV-H variants associated with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2000, 101, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mameli, G.; Madeddu, G.; Mei, A.; Uleri, E.; Poddighe, L.; Delogu, L.G.; Maida, I.; Babudieri, S.; Serra, C.; Manetti, R.; et al. Activation of MSRV-type endogenous retroviruses during infectious mononucleosis and Epstein-Barr virus latency: The missing link with multiple sclerosis? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sutkowski, N.; Conrad, B.; Thorley-Lawson, D.A.; Huber, B.T. Epstein-Barr virus transactivates the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K18 that encodes a superantigen. Immunity 2001, 15, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mostafa, A.; Jalilvand, S.; Shoja, Z.; Nejati, A.; Shahmahmoodi, S.; Sahraian, M.A.; Marashi, S.M. Multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and vitamin D status in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J. Med. Virol. 2017, 89, 1309–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mameli, G.; Serra, C.; Astone, V.; Castellazzi, M.; Poddighe, L.; Fainardi, E.; Neri, W.; Granieri, E.; Dolei, A. Inhibition of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus as biomarker of interferon therapy. J. Neurovirol. 2008, 14, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Arru, G.; Leoni, S.; Pugliatti, M.; Mei, A.; Serra, C.; Delogu, L.G.; Manetti, R.; Dolei, A.; Sotgiu, S.; Mameli, G. Natalizumab inhibits the expression of human endogenous retroviruses of the W family in multiple sclerosis patients: A longitudinal cohort study. Mult. Scler. 2014, 20, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Derfuss, T.; Curtin, F.; Guebelin, C.; Bridel, C.; Rasenack, M.; Matthey, A.; Du Pasquier, R.; Schluep, M.; Desmeules, J.; Lang, A.B.; et al. A phase IIa randomized clinical study testing GNbAC1, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the envelope protein of multiple sclerosis associated endogenous retrovirus in multiple sclerosis patients-a twelve month follow-up. J. Neuroimmunol. 2015, 285, 68–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kremer, D.; Förster, M.; Schichel, T.; Göttle, P.; Hartung, H.P.; Perron, H.; Küry, P. The neutralizing antibody GNbAC1 abrogates HERV-W envelope protein-mediated oligodendroglial maturation blockade. Mult. Scler. 2015, 21, 1200–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Virtanen, J.O.; Pietiläinen-Nicklén, J.; Uotila, L.; Färkkilä, M.; Vaheri, A.; Koskiniemi, M. Intrathecal human herpesvirus 6 antibodies in multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases presenting as oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid. J. Neuroimmunol. 2011, 237, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Keyvani, H.; Zahednasab, H.; Aljanabi, H.A.A.; Asadi, M.; Mirzaei, R.; Esghaei, M.; Karampoor, S. The role of human herpesvirus-6 and inflammatory markers in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2020, 346, 577313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Simpson, S., Jr.; Taylor, B.; Dwyer, D.E.; Taylor, J.; Blizzard, L.; Ponsonby, A.L.; Pittas, F.; Dwyer, T.; van der Mei, I. Anti-HHV-6 IgG titer significantly predicts subsequent relapse risk in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2012, 18, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Soldan, S.S.; Leist, T.P.; Juhng, K.N.; McFarland, H.F.; Jacobson, S. Increased lymphoproliferative response to human herpesvirus type 6A variant in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Akhyani, N.; Berti, R.; Brennan, M.B.; Soldan, S.S.; Eaton, J.M.; McFarland, H.F.; Jacobson, S. Tissue distribution and variant characterization of human herpesvirus (HHV)-6: Increased prevalence of HHV-6A in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 182, 1321–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tejada-Simon, M.V.; Zang, Y.C.; Hong, J.; Rivera, V.M.; Zhang, J.Z. Cross-reactivity with myelin basic protein and human herpesvirus-6 in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 53, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Engdahl, E.; Gustafsson, R.; Huang, J.; Biström, M.; Lima Bomfim, I.; Stridh, P.; Khademi, M.; Brenner, N.; Butt, J.; Michel, A.; et al. Increased Serological Response Against Human Herpesvirus 6A Is Associated With Risk for Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, J.; Engdahl, E.; Gustafsson, R.; Fogdell-Hahn, A.; Waterboer, T.; Hillert, J.; Olsson, T.; Alfredsson, L.; Hedström, A.K. High antibody levels against human herpesvirus-6A interact with lifestyle factors in multiple sclerosis development. Mult. Scler. 2022, 28, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Biström, M.; Jons, D.; Engdahl, E.; Gustafsson, R.; Huang, J.; Brenner, N.; Butt, J.; Alonso-Magdalena, L.; Gunnarsson, M.; Vrethem, M.; et al. Epstein-Barr virus infection after adolescence and human herpesvirus 6A as risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cekanaviciute, E.; Yoo, B.B.; Runia, T.F.; Debelius, J.W.; Singh, S.; Nelson, C.A.; Kanner, R.; Bencosme, Y.; Lee, Y.K.; Hauser, S.L.; et al. Gut bacteria from multiple sclerosis patients modulate human T cells and exacerbate symptoms in mouse models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10713–10718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Katz Sand, I.; Zhu, Y.; Ntranos, A.; Clemente, J.C.; Cekanaviciute, E.; Brandstadter, R.; Crabtree-Hartman, E.; Singh, S.; Bencosme, Y.; Debelius, J.; et al. Disease-modifying therapies alter gut microbial composition in MS. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 6, e517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Castillo-Álvarez, F.; Pérez-Matute, P.; Oteo, J.A.; Marzo-Sola, M.E. The influence of interferon β-1b on gut microbiota composition in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurologia (Engl. Ed.) 2021, 36, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cox, L.M.; Maghzi, A.H.; Liu, S.; Tankou, S.K.; Dhang, F.H.; Willocq, V.; Song, A.; Wasén, C.; Tauhid, S.; Chu, R.; et al. Gut Microbiome in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2021, 89, 1195–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shah, S.; Locca, A.; Dorsett, Y.; Cantoni, C.; Ghezzi, L.; Lin, Q.; Bokoliya, S.; Panier, H.; Suther, C.; Gormley, M.; et al. Alterations of the gut mycobiome in patients with MS. EBioMedicine 2021, 71, 103557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Alonso, R.; Fernández-Fernández, A.M.; Pisa, D.; Carrasco, L. Multiple sclerosis and mixed microbial infections. Direct identification of fungi and bacteria in nervous tissue. Neurobiol. Dis. 2018, 117, 42–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Saroukolaei, S.A.; Ghabaee, M.; Shokri, H.; Badiei, A.; Ghourchian, S. The role of Candida albicans in the severity of multiple sclerosis. Mycoses 2016, 59, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pisa, D.; Alonso, R.; Jiménez-Jiménez, F.J.; Carrasco, L. Fungal infection in cerebrospinal fluid from some patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 32, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Berg-Hansen, P.; Vandvik, B.; Fagerhol, M.; Holmøy, T. Calprotectin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid reflect disease activity in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2009, 216, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Truss, C.O. The role of Candida albicans in human illness. J. Orthomol. Psychiatry 1981, 10, 38. [Google Scholar]
  82. Cossu, D.; Cocco, E.; Paccagnini, D.; Masala, S.; Ahmed, N.; Frau, J.; Marrosu, M.G.; Sechi, L.A. Association of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis with multiple sclerosis in Sardinian patients. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18482. [Google Scholar]
  83. Frau, J.; Cossu, D.; Coghe, G.; Lorefice, L.; Fenu, G.; Melis, M.; Paccagnini, D.; Sardu, C.; Murru, M.R.; Tranquilli, S.; et al. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and multiple sclerosis in Sardinian patients: Epidemiology and clinical features. Mult. Scler. 2013, 19, 1437–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cossu, D.; Yokoyama, K.; Sechi, L.A.; Otsubo, S.; Tomizawa, Y.; Momotani, E.; Hattori, N. Humoral response against host-mimetic homologous epitopes of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Japanese multiple sclerosis patients. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Cossu, D.; Masala, S.; Frau, J.; Mameli, G.; Marrosu, M.G.; Cocco, E.; Sechi, L.A. Antigenic epitopes of MAP2694 homologous to T-cell receptor gamma-chain are highly recognized in multiple sclerosis Sardinian patients. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 57, 138–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cossu, D.; Mameli, G.; Galleri, G.; Cocco, E.; Masala, S.; Frau, J.; Marrosu, M.G.; Manetti, R.; Sechi, L.A. Human interferon regulatory factor 5 homologous epitopes of Epstein-Barr virus and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis induce a specific humoral and cellular immune response in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 2015, 21, 984–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Frau, J.; Cossu, D.; Sardu, C.; Mameli, G.; Coghe, G.; Lorefice, L.; Fenu, G.; Tranquilli, S.; Sechi, L.A.; Marrosu, M.G.; et al. Combining HLA-DRB1-DQB1 and Mycobacterium Avium Subspecies Paratubercolosis (MAP) antibodies in Sardinian multiple sclerosis patients: Associated or independent risk factors? BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Salim, M.A.; Eftekharian, M.M.; Taheri, M.; Yousef Alikhani, M. Determining the IgM and IgG antibody titer against CMV and helicobacter pylori in the serum of multiple sclerosis patients comparing to the control group in Hamadan. Hum. Antibodies 2017, 26, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Grut, V.; Biström, M.; Salzer, J.; Stridh, P.; Jons, D.; Gustafsson, R.; Fogdell-Hahn, A.; Huang, J.; Brenner, N.; Butt, J.; et al. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity is associated with reduced risk of multiple sclerosis-a presymptomatic case-control study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 3072–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sundqvist, E.; Bergström, T.; Daialhosein, H.; Nyström, M.; Sundström, P.; Hillert, J.; Alfredsson, L.; Kockum, I.; Olsson, T. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity is negatively associated with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2014, 20, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Handel, A.E.; Williamson, A.J.; Disanto, G.; Handunnetthi, L.; Giovannoni, G.; Ramagopalan, S.V. An updated meta-analysis of risk of multiple sclerosis following infectious mononucleosis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lassmann, H.; Niedobitek, G.; Aloisi, F.; Middeldorp, J.M.; NeuroproMiSe EBV Working Group. Epstein-Barr virus in the multiple sclerosis brain: A controversial issue--report on a focused workshop held in the Centre for Brain Research of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Brain 2011, 134 Pt 9, 2772–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Makhani, N.; Tremlett, H. The multiple sclerosis prodrome. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2021, 17, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Laurence, M.; Benito-León, J. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: Updating Pender’s hypothesis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017, 16, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Guan, Y.; Jakimovski, D.; Ramanathan, M.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Zivadinov, R. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: From molecular pathophysiology to in vivo imaging. Neural. Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 373–386. [Google Scholar]
  96. Serafini, B.; Rosicarelli, B.; Veroni, C.; Mazzola, G.A.; Aloisi, F. Epstein-Barr Virus-Specific CD8 T Cells Selectively Infiltrate the Brain in Multiple Sclerosis and Interact Locally with Virus-Infected Cells: Clue for a Virus-Driven Immunopathological Mechanism. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00980-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Laichalk, L.L.; Hochberg, D.; Babcock, G.J.; Freeman, R.B.; Thorley-Lawson, D.A. The dispersal of mucosal memory B cells: Evidence from persistent EBV infection. Immunity 2002, 16, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sedighi, S.; Gholizadeh, O.; Yasamineh, S.; Akbarzadeh, S.; Amini, P.; Favakehi, P.; Afkhami, H.; Firouzi-Amandi, A.; Pahlevan, D.; Eslami, M.; et al. Comprehensive Investigations Relationship Between Viral Infections and Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 80, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dolei, A.; Perron, H. The multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus and its HERV-W endogenous family: A biological interface between virology, genetics, and immunology in human physiology and disease. J. Neurovirol. 2009, 15, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Aloisi, F.; Cross, A.H. MINI-review of Epstein-Barr virus involvement in multiple sclerosis etiology and pathogenesis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2022, 371, 577935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jacobs, B.M.; Giovannoni, G.; Cuzick, J.; Dobson, R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Epstein-Barr virus, multiple sclerosis and other risk factors. Mult. Scler. 2020, 26, 1281–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ortega-Hernandez, O.D.; Martínez-Cáceres, E.M.; Presas-Rodríguez, S.; Ramo-Tello, C. Epstein-Barr Virus and Multiple Sclerosis: A Convoluted Interaction and the Opportunity to Unravel Predictive Biomarkers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ruprecht, K. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in the etiology of multiple sclerosis: A current review. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 16, 1143–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kosowicz, J.G.; Lee, J.; Peiffer, B.; Guo, Z.; Chen, J.; Liao, G.; Hayward, S.D.; Liu, J.O.; Ambinder, R.F. Drug Modulators of B Cell Signaling Pathways and Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Activation. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00747-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Aloisi, F.; Giovannoni, G.; Salvetti, M. Epstein-Barr virus as a cause of multiple sclerosis: Opportunities for prevention and therapy. Lancet Neurol. 2023, 22, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wei, C.J.; Bu, W.; Nguyen, L.A.; Batchelor, J.D.; Kim, J.; Pittaluga, S.; Fuller, J.R.; Nguyen, H.; Chou, T.H.; Cohen, J.I.; et al. A bivalent Epstein-Barr virus vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies that block infection and confer immunity in humanized mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabf3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Perron, H.; Bernard, C.; Bertrand, J.B.; Lang, A.B.; Popa, I.; Sanhadji, K.; Portoukalian, J. Endogenous retroviral genes, Herpesviruses and gender in Multiple Sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 286, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Morandi, E.; Tanasescu, R.; Tarlinton, R.E.; Constantinescu, C.S.; Zhang, W.; Tench, C.; Gran, B. The association between human endogenous retroviruses and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Arneth, B. Up-to-date knowledge about the association between multiple sclerosis and the reactivation of human endogenous retrovirus infections. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tarlinton, R.E.; Martynova, E.; Rizvanov, A.A.; Khaiboullina, S.; Verma, S. Role of Viruses in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis. Viruses 2020, 12, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bogdanos, D.P.; Smyk, D.S.; Invernizzi, P.; Rigopoulou, E.I.; Blank, M.; Pouria, S.; Shoenfeld, Y. Infectome: A platform to trace infectious triggers of autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 2013, 12, 726–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Saini, S.K.; Ørskov, A.D.; Bjerregaard, A.M.; Unnikrishnan, A.; Holmberg-Thydén, S.; Borch, A.; Jensen, K.V.; Anande, G.; Bentzen, A.K.; Marquard, A.M.; et al. Human endogenous retroviruses form a reservoir of T cell targets in hematological cancers. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Brütting, C.; Stangl, G.I.; Staege, M.S. Vitamin D, Epstein-Barr virus, and endogenous retroviruses in multiple sclerosis-facts and hypotheses. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2021, 20, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dolei, A. The aliens inside us: HERV-W endogenous retroviruses and multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2018, 24, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xu, L.; Zhang, L.J.; Yang, L.; Yang, C.S.; Yi, M.; Zhang, S.N.; Wang, N.; Huang, C.N.; Liu, M.Q. Positive association of herpes simplex virus-IgG with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2021, 47, 102633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ablashi, D.; Agut, H.; Alvarez-Lafuente, R.; Clark, D.A.; Dewhurst, S.; DiLuca, D.; Flamand, L.; Frenkel, N.; Gallo, R.; Gompels, U.A.; et al. Classification of HHV-6A and HHV-6B as distinct viruses. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Merelli, E.; Bedin, R.; Sola, P.; Barozzi, P.; Mancardi, G.L.; Ficarra, G.; Franchini, G. Human herpes virus 6 and human herpes virus 8 DNA sequences in brains of multiple sclerosis patients, normal adults and children. J. Neurol. 1997, 244, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Voumvourakis, K.I.; Kitsos, D.K.; Tsiodras, S.; Petrikkos, G.; Stamboulis, E. Human herpesvirus 6 infection as a trigger of multiple sclerosis. Mayo. Clin. Proc. 2010, 85, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lundström, W.; Gustafsson, R. Human Herpesvirus 6A Is a Risk Factor for Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 840753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Fierz, W. Multiple sclerosis: An example of pathogenic viral interaction? Virol. J. 2017, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dunn, N.; Kharlamova, N.; Fogdell-Hahn, A. The role of herpesvirus 6A and 6B in multiple sclerosis and epilepsy. Scand. J. Immunol. 2020, 92, e12984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hube, B. From commensal to pathogen: Stage- and tissue-specific gene expression of Candida albicans. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Correale, J.; Hohlfeld, R.; Baranzini, S.E. The role of the gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2022, 18, 544–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012, 486, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cronin, O.; O’Sullivan, O.; Barton, W.; Cotter, P.D.; Molloy, M.G.; Shanahan, F. Gut microbiota: Implications for sports and exercise medicine. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 51, 700–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Yao, Y.; Cai, X.; Ye, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, F.; Zheng, C. The Role of Microbiota in Infant Health: From Early Life to Adulthood. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 708472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Altieri, C.; Speranza, B.; Corbo, M.R.; Sinigaglia, M.; Bevilacqua, A. Gut-Microbiota, and Multiple Sclerosis: Background, Evidence, and Perspectives. Nutrients 2023, 15, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Miyauchi, E.; Shimokawa, C.; Steimle, A.; Desai, M.S.; Ohno, H. The impact of the gut microbiome on extra-intestinal autoimmune diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023, 23, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cantarel, B.L.; Waubant, E.; Chehoud, C.; Kuczynski, J.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Warrington, J.; Venkatesan, A.; Fraser, C.M.; Mowry, E.M. Gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis: Possible influence of immunomodulators. J. Investig. Med. 2015, 63, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Pilotto, S.; Zoledziewska, M.; Fenu, G.; Cocco, E.; Lorefice, L. Disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis: Implications for gut microbiota. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2023, 73, 104671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Severance, E.G.; Gressitt, K.L.; Stallings, C.R.; Katsafanas, E.; Schweinfurth, L.A.; Savage, C.L.; Adamos, M.B.; Sweeney, K.M.; Origoni, A.E.; Khushalani, S.; et al. Candida albicans exposures, sex specificity and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. NPJ Schizophr. 2016, 2, 16018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Purzycki, C.B.; Shain, D.H. Fungal toxins and multiple sclerosis: A compelling connection. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 82, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Moser, T.; Akgün, K.; Proschmann, U.; Sellner, J.; Ziemssen, T. The role of TH17 cells in multiple sclerosis: Therapeutic implications. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Hernández-Santos, N.; Gaffen, S.L. Th17 cells in immunity to Candida albicans. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 11, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Marijnissen, R.J.; Kullberg, B.J.; Koenen, H.J.; Cheng, S.C.; Joosten, I.; van den Berg, W.B.; Williams, D.L.; van der Meer, J.W.; Joosten, L.A.; et al. The macrophage mannose receptor induces IL-17 in response to Candida albicans. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 5, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Marijnissen, R.J.; Koenders, M.I.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Dulos, J.; Netea, M.G.; Boots, A.M.; Joosten, L.A.; van den Berg, W.B. Exposure to Candida albicans polarizes a T-cell driven arthritis model towards Th17 responses, resulting in a more destructive arthritis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Mameli, G.; Cocco, E.; Frau, J.; Marrosu, M.G.; Sechi, L.A. Epstein Barr Virus and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis peptides are recognized in sera and cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Dow, C.T. Proposing BCG Vaccination for Mycobacterium avium ss. paratuberculosis (MAP) Associated Autoimmune Diseases. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Amato, M.P.; De Stefano, N.; Inglese, M.; Morena, E.; Ristori, G.; Salvetti, M.; Trojano, M. Secondary Prevention in Radiologically Isolated Syndromes and Prodromal Stages of Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 787160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ristori, G.; Buzzi, M.G.; Sabatini, U.; Giugni, E.; Bastianello, S.; Viselli, F.; Buttinelli, C.; Ruggieri, S.; Colonnese, C.; Pozzilli, C.; et al. Use of Bacille Calmette-Guèrin (BCG) in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1999, 53, 1588–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Paolillo, A.; Buzzi, M.G.; Giugni, E.; Sabatini, U.; Bastianello, S.; Pozzilli, C.; Salvetti, M.; Ristori, G. The effect of Bacille Calmette-Guérin on the evolution of new enhancing lesions to hypointense T1 lesions in relapsing remitting MS. J. Neurol. 2003, 250, 247–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ristori, G.; Romano, S.; Cannoni, S.; Visconti, A.; Tinelli, E.; Mendozzi, L.; Cecconi, P.; Lanzillo, R.; Quarantelli, M.; Buttinelli, C.; et al. Effects of Bacille Calmette-Guerin after the first demyelinating event in the CNS. Neurology 2014, 82, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Baasch, S.; Ruzsics, Z.; Henneke, P. Cytomegaloviruses and Macrophages-Friends and Foes From Early on? Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Wingerchuk, D.M.; Banwell, B.; Bennett, J.L.; Cabre, P.; Carroll, W.; Chitnis, T.; de Seze, J.; Fujihara, K.; Greenberg, B.; Jacob, A.; et al. International Panel for NMO Diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 2015, 85, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Liu, C.; Wang, G.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Dai, Y.; Hu, X. CD226 Gly307Ser association with neuromyelitis optica in Southern Han Chinese. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 39, 488–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhong, X.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, T.; Wang, Z.; Fang, L.; Peng, L.; Kermode, A.G.; Qiu, W. Infections in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 47, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Barros, P.O.; Linhares, U.C.; Teixeira, B.; Kasahara, T.M.; Ferreira, T.B.; Alvarenga, R.; Hygino, J.; Silva-Filho, R.G.; Bittencourt, V.C.; Andrade, R.M.; et al. High in vitro immune reactivity to Escherichia coli in neuromyelitis optica patients is correlated with both neurological disabilities and elevated plasma lipopolysaccharide levels. Hum. Immunol. 2013, 74, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Koga, M.; Takahashi, T.; Kawai, M.; Fujihara, K.; Kanda, T. A serological analysis of viral and bacterial infections associated with neuromyelitis optica. J. Neurol. Sci. 2011, 300, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wingerchuk, D.M.; Hogancamp, W.F.; O’Brien, P.C.; Weinshenker, B.G. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology 1999, 53, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bergamaschi, R.; Ghezzi, A. Devic’s neuromyelitis optica: Clinical features and prognostic factors. Neurol. Sci. 2004, 25 (Suppl. 4), S364–S367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Sellner, J.; Hemmer, B.; Mühlau, M. The clinical spectrum and immunobiology of parainfectious neuromyelitis optica (Devic) syndromes. J. Autoimmun. 2010, 34, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Münz, C.; Lünemann, J.D.; Getts, M.T.; Miller, S.D. Antiviral immune responses: Triggers of or triggered by autoimmunity? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Graves, J.; Grandhe, S.; Weinfurtner, K.; Krupp, L.; Belman, A.; Chitnis, T.; Ness, J.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Gorman, M.; Patterson, M. Protective environmental factors for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2014, 83, 1923–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Brey, N.; Henning, F. Relapsing neuromyelitis optica temporally related to recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2014, 18, 632–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, R.; Zhong, X.; Qiu, W.; Wu, A.; Dai, Y.; Lu, Z.; Hu, X. Association between neuromyelitis optica and tuberculosis in a Chinese population. BMC Neurol. 2014, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zatjirua, V.; Butler, J.; Carr, J.; Henning, F. Neuromyelitis optica and pulmonary tuberculosis: A case-control study. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2011, 15, 1675–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Rafai, M.A.; Boulaajaj, F.Z.; Gynerane, M.; El Moutawakkil, B.; Slassi, I. Devic-like syndrome in the course of pulmonary tuberculosis. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2010, 110, 196–200. [Google Scholar]
  159. Feng, Y.Q.; Guo, N.; Huang, F.; Chen, X.; Sun, Q.S.; Liu, J.X. Anti-tuberculosis treatment for Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2010, 17, 1372–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Papais-Alvarenga, R.M.; Miranda-Santos, C.M.; Puccioni-Sohler, M.; de Almeida, A.M.; Oliveira, S.; Basilio De Oliveira, C.A.; Alvarenga, H.; Poser, C.M. Optic neuromyelitis syndrome in Brazilian patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002, 73, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yoshimura, S.; Isobe, N.; Matsushita, T.; Yonekawa, T.; Masaki, K.; Sato, S.; Kawano, Y.; Kira, J.; South Japan Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Distinct genetic and infectious profiles in Japanese neuromyelitis optica patients according to anti-aquaporin 4 antibody status. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2013, 84, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Long, Y.; Gao, C.; Qiu, W.; Hu, X.; Shu, Y.; Peng, F.; Lu, Z. Helicobacter pylori infection in Neuromyelitis Optica and Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroimmunomodulation 2013, 20, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, W.; Minohara, M.; Piao, H.; Matsushita, T.; Masaki, K.; Matsuoka, T.; Isobe, N.; Su, J.J.; Ohyagi, Y.; Kira, J. Association of anti-Helicobacter pylori neutrophil-activating protein antibody response with anti-aquaporin-4 autoimmunity in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. Mult. Scler. 2009, 15, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Barzegar, M.; Nouri, H.; Mirmosayyeb, O.; Motedayyen, H.; Nehzat, N.; Shaygannejad, V. Association Between Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Casp. J. Neurol. Sci. 2023, 9, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Masuda, S.; Mori, M.; Arai, K.; Uzawa, A.; Muto, M.; Uchida, T.; Masuda, H.; Kuwabara, S. Epstein-Barr virus persistence and reactivation in neuromyelitis optica. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Mori, M. Association between Multiple Sclerosis or Neuromyelitis Optica and Epstein-Barr Virus. Brain Nerve 2015, 67, 881–890. [Google Scholar]
  167. Arru, G.; Sechi, E.; Mariotto, S.; Farinazzo, A.; Mancinelli, C.; Alberti, D.; Ferrari, S.; Gajofatto, A.; Capra, R.; Monaco, S.; et al. Antibody response against HERV-W env surface peptides differentiates multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult. Scler. J. Exp. Transl. Clin. 2017, 3, 2055217317742425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Arru, G.; Sechi, E.; Mariotto, S.; Zarbo, I.R.; Ferrari, S.; Gajofatto, A.; Monaco, S.; Deiana, G.A.; Bo, M.; Sechi, L.A.; et al. Antibody response against HERV-W in patients with MOG-IgG associated disorders, multiple sclerosis and NMOSD. J. Neuroimmunol. 2020, 338, 577110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Cree, B.A.; Spencer, C.M.; Varrin-Doyer, M.; Baranzini, S.E.; Zamvil, S.S. Gut microbiome analysis in neuromyelitis optica reveals overabundance of Clostridium perfringens. Ann. Neurol. 2016, 80, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Varrin-Doyer, M.; Spencer, C.M.; Schulze-Topphoff, U.; Nelson, P.A.; Stroud, R.M.; Cree, B.A.; Zamvil, S.S. Aquaporin 4-specific T cells in neuromyelitis optica exhibit a Th17 bias and recognize Clostridium ABC transporter. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 72, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Mathew, T.; Avati, A.; D’Souza, D.; Therambil, M.; Baptist, A.A.; Shaji, A.; Nadig, R.; Rockey, S.M.; Parry, G. HIV infection associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Clinical features, imaging findings, management and outcomes. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2019, 27, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Younas, M.; Psomas, C.; Reynes, J.; Corbeau, P. Immune activation in the course of HIV-1 infection: Causes, phenotypes and persistence under therapy. HIV Med. 2016, 17, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Feyissa, A.M.; Singh, P.; Smith, R.G. Neuromyelitis optica in patients with coexisting human immunodeficiency virus infections. Mult. Scler. 2013, 19, 1363–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Kountouras, J.; Zavos, C.; Polyzos, S.A.; Michael, S.; Tsiaousi, E.; Vardaka, E.; Katsinelos, P.; Kouklakis, G.; Paikos, D.; Gavalas, E.; et al. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and autoimmune disorders. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2013, 51, e73–e74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Lederman, M.M.; Funderburg, N.T.; Sekaly, R.P.; Klatt, N.R.; Hunt, P.W. Residual immune dysregulation syndrome in treated HIV infection. Adv. Immunol. 2013, 119, 51–83. [Google Scholar]
  176. Delgado, S.R.; Maldonado, J.; Rammohan, K.W. CNS demyelinating disorder with mixed features of neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis in HIV-1 infection. Case report and literature review. J. Neurovirol. 2014, 20, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. López-Chiriboga, A.S.; Majed, M.; Fryer, J.; Dubey, D.; McKeon, A.; Flanagan, E.P.; Jitprapaikulsan, J.; Kothapalli, N.; Tillema, J.M.; Chen, J.; et al. Association of MOG-IgG Serostatus With Relapse After Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for MOG-IgG-Associated Disorders. JAMA Neurol. 2018, 75, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Ramanathan, S.; Mohammad, S.; Tantsis, E.; Nguyen, T.K.; Merheb, V.; Fung, V.S.C.; White, O.B.; Broadley, S.; Lechner-Scott, J.; Vucic, S.; et al. Clinical course, therapeutic responses and outcomes in relapsing MOG antibody-associated demyelination. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2018, 89, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Jurynczyk, M.; Messina, S.; Woodhall, M.R.; Raza, N.; Everett, R.; Roca-Fernandez, A.; Tackley, G.; Hamid, S.; Sheard, A.; Reynolds, G.; et al. Clinical presentation and prognosis in MOG-antibody disease: A UK study. Brain 2017, 140, 3128–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sechi, E.; Buciuc, M.; Pittock, S.J.; Chen, J.J.; Fryer, J.P.; Jenkins, S.M.; Budhram, A.; Weinshenker, B.G.; Lopez-Chiriboga, A.S.; Tillema, J.M.; et al. Positive Predictive Value of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibody Testing. JAMA Neurol. 2021, 78, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Esposito, S.; Di Pietro, G.M.; Madini, B.; Mastrolia, M.V.; Rigante, D. A spectrum of inflammation and demyelination in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) of children. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Thomas, G.S.; Hussain, I.H. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: A report of six cases. Med. J. Malays. 2004, 59, 342–351. [Google Scholar]
  183. Chowdhary, J.; Ashraf, S.M.; Khajuria, K. Measles with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Indian Pediatr. 2009, 46, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  184. Ozkale, Y.; Erol, I.; Ozkale, M.; Demir, S.; Alehan, F. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis associated with influenza A H1N1 infection. Pediatr. Neurol. 2012, 47, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Mariotti, P.; Batocchi, A.P.; Colosimo, C.; Cattani, P.; Stefanini, M.C.; Colitto, F.; Tonali, P.; Guzzetta, F. Positive PCR for enterovirus in the cerebrospinal fluid of a child with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. J. Neurol. 2004, 251, 1267–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Yeh, E.A.; Collins, A.; Cohen, M.E.; Duffner, P.K.; Faden, H. Detection of coronavirus in the central nervous system of a child with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Pediatrics 2004, 113, e73–e76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  187. Nakamura, Y.; Nakajima, H.; Tani, H.; Hosokawa, T.; Ishida, S.; Kimura, F.; Kaneko, K.; Takahashi, T.; Nakashima, I. Anti-MOG antibody-positive ADEM following infectious mononucleosis due to a primary EBV infection: A case report. BMC Neurol. 2017, 17, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Nakamura, M.; Iwasaki, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Kaneko, K.; Nakashima, I.; Kunieda, T.; Kaneko, S.; Kusaka, H. A case of MOG antibody-positive bilateral optic neuritis and meningoganglionitis following a genital herpes simplex virus infection. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017, 17, 148–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Bonagiri, P.; Park, D.; Ingebritsen, J.; Christie, L.J. Seropositive anti-MOG antibody-associated acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM): A sequelae of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e234565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Huang, X.; Guo, R.; Li, C.; Long, X.; Yang, T.; Hou, X.; Wei, X.; Ou, M. A case of anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-immunoglobulin G (IgG) associated disorder (MOGAD) with clinical manifestations of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: Secondary to mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Huda, S.; Whittam, D.; Jackson, R.; Karthikeayan, V.; Kelly, P.; Linaker, S.; Mutch, K.; Kneen, R.; Woodhall, M.; Murray, K.; et al. Predictors of relapse in MOG antibody associated disease: A cohort study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e055392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Eaton, J.; Rahmlow, M. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated transverse myelitis following brain abscess: Case report and literature review. J. Neuroimmunol. 2022, 372, 577967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. de Luca, V.; Martins Higa, A.; Malta Romano, C.; Pimenta Mambrini, G.; Peroni, L.A.; Trivinho-Strixino, F.; Lima Leite, F. Cross-reactivity between myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and human endogenous retrovirus W protein: Nanotechnological evidence for the potential trigger of multiple sclerosis. Micron 2019, 120, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Abud, A.M.; Rizvi, S.; Zainah, H.; O’Brien, T.C.; Villamar, M.F. Aggressive MOGAD with bilateral corticospinal tract lesions following infection with Jamestown Canyon virus. J. Neuroimmunol. 2022, 373, 577997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Armangue, T.; Olivé-Cirera, G.; Martínez-Hernandez, E.; Sepulveda, M.; Ruiz-Garcia, R.; Muñoz-Batista, M.; Ariño, H.; González-Álvarez, V.; Felipe-Rucián, A.; Jesús Martínez-González, M.; et al. Associations of paediatric demyelinating and encephalitic syndromes with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies: A multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Lotan, I.; Nishiyama, S.; Manzano, G.S.; Lydston, M.; Levy, M. COVID-19 and the risk of CNS demyelinating diseases: A systematic review. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 970383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Qin, C.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Tao, Y.; Xie, C.; Ma, K.; Shang, K.; Wang, W.; et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 13 01309 g001 550
Figure 1. Representation of the potential inflammation-mediated mechanisms underlying autoimmunity triggered by infections. (A) Molecular mimicry: In certain instances, the antigens found on pathogens may bear a resemblance to self-antigens present in the body. This similarity can result in the activation of autoreactive T cells, which erroneously identify self-antigens as foreign. Notably, in demyelinating diseases, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) present myelin components to autoreactive CD4+ T cells, initiating the cascade of autoimmune responses. (B) Bystander activation: The virus induces a profound inflammatory response, resulting in significant damage to the surrounding tissue. Consequently, additional autoantigens become exposed and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) present these autoantigens to autoreactive CD4+ T cells. (C) Epitope spreading: Initially, the immune response may target a specific antigen derived from the infecting pathogen. However, as time progresses, the immune response can expand to encompass other self-antigens that share structural similarities or associations with the initial target antigen. In demyelinating diseases, for instance, viral infections can lead to the destruction of oligodendrocytes. Subsequent fragmentation of myelin in the inflammatory milieu exposes additional antigens, contributing to a self-perpetuating cycle of myelin destruction. (D) Dual T cell receptor: Certain T lymphocytes possess the capability to express multiple T cell receptors, allowing them to recognize both viral and myelin antigens. Consequently, these dual-specificity T cells can activate responses against both types of antigens simultaneously.
Figure 1. Representation of the potential inflammation-mediated mechanisms underlying autoimmunity triggered by infections. (A) Molecular mimicry: In certain instances, the antigens found on pathogens may bear a resemblance to self-antigens present in the body. This similarity can result in the activation of autoreactive T cells, which erroneously identify self-antigens as foreign. Notably, in demyelinating diseases, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) present myelin components to autoreactive CD4+ T cells, initiating the cascade of autoimmune responses. (B) Bystander activation: The virus induces a profound inflammatory response, resulting in significant damage to the surrounding tissue. Consequently, additional autoantigens become exposed and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) present these autoantigens to autoreactive CD4+ T cells. (C) Epitope spreading: Initially, the immune response may target a specific antigen derived from the infecting pathogen. However, as time progresses, the immune response can expand to encompass other self-antigens that share structural similarities or associations with the initial target antigen. In demyelinating diseases, for instance, viral infections can lead to the destruction of oligodendrocytes. Subsequent fragmentation of myelin in the inflammatory milieu exposes additional antigens, contributing to a self-perpetuating cycle of myelin destruction. (D) Dual T cell receptor: Certain T lymphocytes possess the capability to express multiple T cell receptors, allowing them to recognize both viral and myelin antigens. Consequently, these dual-specificity T cells can activate responses against both types of antigens simultaneously.
Life 13 01309 g001
Life 13 01309 g002 550
Figure 2. Representation of the interaction between EBV, HHV-6, HERV and vitamin D in triggering MS. Vitamin D deficiency has been proposed to influence the risk of MS in individuals infected with EBV due to the overlap between the receptor-binding sites of EBNA-2 (a protein produced by EBV) and vitamin D. Additionally, high levels of vitamin D may inhibit EBV infection through apoptosis, while HHV-6 can activate latent EBV in B cells. In patients with MS, an interaction between vitamin D and HERV has also been observed. There is an inverse correlation between HERV-W DNA levels and vitamin D levels and high vitamin D levels may inhibit HERV transactivation. Furthermore, low vitamin D levels increase the risk of MS in individuals with high titers of anti-HHV-6A antibodies. EBV has the ability to induce the expression of certain HERV genes and the activation of HERV-W during infectious mononucleosis has been proposed as a potential effector in the pathogenesis of MS. It is important to note that while these relationships have been identified, the precise mechanisms and their significance in MS development and progression require further investigation. The interplay between EBV, HHV, HERV and vitamin D in the context of MS is complex and multifaceted.
Figure 2. Representation of the interaction between EBV, HHV-6, HERV and vitamin D in triggering MS. Vitamin D deficiency has been proposed to influence the risk of MS in individuals infected with EBV due to the overlap between the receptor-binding sites of EBNA-2 (a protein produced by EBV) and vitamin D. Additionally, high levels of vitamin D may inhibit EBV infection through apoptosis, while HHV-6 can activate latent EBV in B cells. In patients with MS, an interaction between vitamin D and HERV has also been observed. There is an inverse correlation between HERV-W DNA levels and vitamin D levels and high vitamin D levels may inhibit HERV transactivation. Furthermore, low vitamin D levels increase the risk of MS in individuals with high titers of anti-HHV-6A antibodies. EBV has the ability to induce the expression of certain HERV genes and the activation of HERV-W during infectious mononucleosis has been proposed as a potential effector in the pathogenesis of MS. It is important to note that while these relationships have been identified, the precise mechanisms and their significance in MS development and progression require further investigation. The interplay between EBV, HHV, HERV and vitamin D in the context of MS is complex and multifaceted.
Life 13 01309 g002
Table
Table 1. Selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in MS.
Table 1. Selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in MS.
MS
Infectious AgentEvidenceReferences
EBVDefinitively established association between EBV infection and MS onset in a wide cohort study[21]
High titers of anti-EBNA and VCA antibodies are observed in patients with MS[25,26,27]
EBV is a necessary causative agent in the pathogenesis of MS[28]
Serum titers of pre-onset anti-EBNA antibodies are strong markers of MS[29]
EBNA-1 recognized by MS patient sera induces signs of EAE in a murine model[30]
EBNA-1 peptides are cross recognized by anti-MBP antibodies[31]
Immunoreactivity against EBV proteins BRRF2 and EBNA-1 is higher in MS; OCBs belonging to MS patients bound both EBV proteins[32]
OCBs in CSF belonging to MS patients are able to bind EBNA-1 and EBNA-2 epitopes[33]
There is high-affinity molecular mimicry between EBNA-1 and GlialCAM in MS[34]
High titers of anti-EBNA increase the risk of MS and are observed between 15 and 20 years before the onset of the disease[35]
The risk of MS is notably increased after infectious mononucleosis[36]
There is evidence of EBV infection in brain-infiltrating B cells and plasma cells in MS[37]
Mutations in EBNA-2 could influence the host response to EBV[38]
HLA-DRB1*15:01 acts as coreceptor for EBV infection of B cells[39]
Specific EBNA-1 antibodies and HLA-DRB1*1501 interact in the MS risk[40]
EBNA-3 blocks the activation of vitamin D receptor-dependent genes[41]
EBNA-1 antibodies correlate with radiological disease activity[42,43]
The cellular immune response to EBV decreases during ocrelizumab treatment[44]
Teriflunomide inhibits cellular proliferation in EBV-transformed B cells[45]
HERVThe envelope protein of HERV-W has been detected in serum, brain, perivascular infiltrates and macrophages of patients with MS[46,47,48]
HERV mRNA has been found in the brain lesions, CSF and blood cells of individuals with MS[49,50]
The expression of HERV is increased in patients with active MS[51,52]
There is evidence of molecular mimicry between HERV-W envelope protein and myelin proteins[53]
HERV may activate the host immune response by acting as an agonist of human toll-like receptor 4[54]
The HERV-H envelope and gag proteins have been reported to be present in the serum of MS patients[55]
HERV-W could act as effector in MS pathogenesis through its activation during EBV infection [56]
EBV transactivates the HERV-K18 that encodes a superantigen[57]
HERV-W DNA copy number was found to be higher in MS patients and was inversely correlated with vitamin D level[58]
Interferon beta may decrease the expression of HERV-W[59]
Natalizumab inhibits the expression of HERV-W[60]
A new drug tested in a phase II clinical trial for MS, known as GNbAC1, is able to block the HERV-W-dependent inflammatory cascade[61,62]
HHV-6OCBs specific against HHV-6 have been identified in patients with MS[63]
Pro-inflammatory cytokines are higher in HHV-6 infected patients and HHV-6 positivity is associated with higher disability[64]
Anti-HHV-6 IgG titers significantly predict subsequent relapse risk in MS[65]
The lymphoproliferative response to HHV-6A is increased in MS[66]
There is an increased prevalence of HHV-6A in MS[67]
MBP cross-reacts with HHV-6 antigens; thus, there is evidence of a molecular mimicry[68]
Increased serological response against HHV-6A is associated with the risk of MS[69]
There is an interaction between environmental factors and high titers of anti-HHV-6A antibodies in the risk of MS[70]
HHV-6A is a risk factor for MS[71]
Gut MicrobiotaGut bacteria from patients with MS have pro-inflammatory properties[72]
Disease-modifying therapies alter gut microbial composition in MS[73]
Interferon beta can cause an increase in Prevotella[74]
Gut microbiota differs from MS and controls. Enterobacteriaceae and several Clostridium species are associated with progressive course and disability[75]
There is an alteration of gut microbiota in MS patients, with an over-representation of Saccharomyces and Aspergillus[76]
FungiFirst evidence of fungal infection in CNS tissue of MS patients, with detection of fungal DNA[77]
The specific enzyme activity of Candida albicans is greater in MS patients and correlates with disease severity[78]
Fungal antigens and antibodies against several Candida species have been detected in CSF of MS patients[79]
Calprotectin levels in the CSF reflect disease activity[80]
Some improvement in MS symptoms was observed in MS patients after treatment with antifungal drugs[81]
MAPMAP peptides are cross-recognized by anti-MBP antibodies[31]
MAP is associated with MS in Sardinian population[82,83]
MAP is associated with MS in Japanese population[84]
Epitopes of MAP2694 homologous to TCR are highly recognized in MS[85]
Human IRF 5 homologous epitopes of MAP induce a specific immune response[86]
There is no association between the haplotypes predisposing to MS and MAP positivity[87]
CMVCMV can intensify the symptoms in MS patients[88]
CMV seropositivity is negatively associated with MS[89,90]
MS: multiple sclerosis; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; EBNA: Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen; VCA: viral capsid antigen; EAE: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; OCBs: oligoclonal bands; MBP: myelin basic protein; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; HERV: human endogenous retrovirus; HHV: herpes human virus; CNS: central nervous system; MAP: mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis; IRF: interferon regulatory factor; CMV: cytomegalovirus.
Table
Table 2. Selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in NMOSD.
Table 2. Selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in NMOSD.
NMOSD
Infectious AgentEvidenceReferences
TBCase report: a patient with NMOSD experienced relapses following episodes of pulmonary TB[155]
There is no association between NMO and pulmonary TB in a Chinese cohort[156]
There is an association between NMO and pulmonary TB in a South-African cohort[157]
Two cases of NMOSD with onset temporally related to pulmonary TB[158]
Antituberculosis treatment reduced relapses in patients with steroid-refractory NMO and led to neurological recovery[159]
Pulmonary TB was associated with NMOSD in 5 out of 24 Brazilian patients[160]
H. pyloriHigh titers of anti H. pylori antibodies are observed only in AQP4-positive patients[161]
High titers of anti H. pylori antibodies are observed in both AQP4-positive and -negative patients, with stronger association with the first group[162]
A higher prevalence of H. pylori infection was described in AQP4-positive compared to AQP4-negative patients[163]
There is no difference between AQP4-negative patients and healthy controls in terms of the frequency of H. pylori infection[164]
EBVAnti-EA IgG are higher in NMO patients than in MS patients and healthy controls, both in sera and CSF[165]
NMO is associated with the reactivation of EBV[166]
HERVPatients with NMOSD have lower levels of anti-HERV antibodies compared to patients with MS and to healthy individuals[167,168]
Gut microbiotaClostridium perfringens is abundant in individuals with NMO [169]
There is a potential molecular mimicry between Clostridium perfrigens and AQP4[170]
FungiHigh in vitro immune reactivity to Escherichia coli is correlated with disability in NMO[148]
HIVCharacterization of six cases of patients with HIV developing NMOSD[171]
HIV is able to activate several cellular lines of the immune system[172]
Characterization of two cases of patients with HIV developing NMO[173]
NMOSD: neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; TB: tuberculosis; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; EA: early antigen; HERV: human endogenous retrovirus; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.
Table
Table 3. Selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in MOGAD.
Table 3. Selection of studies investigating the role of infectious factors in MOGAD.
MOGAD
Infectious AgentEvidenceReferences
HERVHigher levels of antibodies against HER-W were present in MOGAD than in NMO[168]
There is a cross-reactivity between MOG and HERV-W proteins[193]
MeaslesCase report: ADEM associated with measles[183]
InfluenzaCase report: ADEM associated with influenza A H1N1 infection[184]
CoronavirusCase report: ADEM with detection of coronavirus in CNS[186]
EnterovirusCase report: ADEM with positive PCR for enterovirus in the CSF[185]
Mycoplasma pneumoniaeDescription of cases reporting MOGAD following Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection[189,190]
Jamestown Canyon virusCase report: MOGAD with bilateral corticospinal tract lesions following infection with Jamestown Canyon virus[194]
StreptococcusCase report: MOGAD transverse myelitis following brain abscess[192]
EBVCase report: anti-MOG positive ADEM following infectious mononucleosis[187]
Herpes simplexCase report: MOGAD (bilateral optic neuritis and meningoganglionitis) following a genital herpes simplex virus infection[188]
MOGAD: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease; HERV: human endogenous retrovirus; NMO: neuromyelitis optica; ADEM: acute disseminating encephalomyelitis; CNS: central nervous system; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frau, J.; Coghe, G.; Lorefice, L.; Fenu, G.; Cocco, E. The Role of Microorganisms in the Etiopathogenesis of Demyelinating Diseases. Life 2023, 13, 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061309

AMA Style

Frau J, Coghe G, Lorefice L, Fenu G, Cocco E. The Role of Microorganisms in the Etiopathogenesis of Demyelinating Diseases. Life. 2023; 13(6):1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frau, Jessica, Giancarlo Coghe, Lorena Lorefice, Giuseppe Fenu, and Eleonora Cocco. 2023. "The Role of Microorganisms in the Etiopathogenesis of Demyelinating Diseases" Life 13, no. 6: 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop