Next Article in Journal
Towards an RNA/Peptides World by the Direct RNA Template Mechanism: The Emergence of Membrane-Stabilizing Peptides in RNA-Based Protocells
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Manifestation, Transmission, Pathogenesis, and Diagnosis of Monkeypox Virus: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/life13020524
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Suppression of the HOS1 Gene Affects the Level of ROS Depending on Light and Cold

by
Tatiana Y. Gorpenchenko
1,
Galina N. Veremeichik
1,*,
Yurii N. Shkryl
1,
Yulia A. Yugay
1,
Valeria P. Grigorchuk
1,
Dmitry V. Bulgakov
1,
Tatiana V. Rusapetova
1,
Yulia V. Vereshchagina
1,
Anastasiya A. Mironova
1,
Evgeniyy P. Subbotin
2,
Yuriy N. Kulchin
2 and
Victor P. Bulgakov
1,*
1
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 159 Stoletija Str., 690022 Vladivostok, Russia
2
Institute of Automation and Control Processes, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Radio Str., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(2), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020524
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 February 2023 / Published: 14 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HOS1 is an important integrator of temperature information and developmental processes. HOS1 is a negative regulator of plant cold tolerance, and silencing HOS1 leads to increased cold tolerance. In the present work, we studied ROS levels in hos1Cas9 Arabidopsis thaliana plants, in which the HOS1 gene was silenced by disruption of the open reading frame via CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Confocal imaging of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) showed that the hos1 mutation moderately increased levels of ROS under both low and high light (HL) conditions, but wild-type (WT) and hos1Cas9 plants exhibited similar ROS levels in the dark. Visualization of single cells did not reveal differences in the intracellular distribution of ROS between WT and hos1Cas9 plants. The hos1Cas9 plants contained a high basal level of ascorbic acid, maintained a normal balance between reduced and oxidized glutathione (GSH and GSSG), and generated a strong antioxidant defense response against paraquat under HL conditions. Under cold exposure, the hos1 mutation decreased the ROS level and substantially increased the expression of the ascorbate peroxidase genes Apx1 and Apx2. When plants were pre-exposed to cold and further exposed to HL, the expression of the NADPH oxidase genes RbohD and RbohF was increased in the hos1Cas9 plants but not in WT plants. hos1-mediated changes in the level of ROS are cold-dependent and cold-independent, which implies different levels of regulation. Our data indicate that HOS1 is required to maintain ROS homeostasis not only under cold conditions, but also under conditions of both low and high light intensity. It is likely that HOS1 prevents the overinduction of defense mechanisms to balance growth.

1. Introduction

The pleiotropic regulator HOS1 (E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase; synonym: high expression of osmotically responsive genes 1) is currently attracting attention from researchers as a link between the developmental processes of plants and abiotic stresses. This protein is considered a key integrator of temperature information and developmental processes that are essential for plant survival [1]. HOS1 is necessary to adapt the development of plants both to short-term cold stress and freezing tolerance by interacting with transcription factor ICE1 (Inducer of CBF expression 1), an important factor in establishing cold resistance [2,3,4,5]. ICE1 induces genes encoding dehydration-responsive element-binding proteins (CBFs), such as CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3, by binding to gene promoters [6,7]. This leads to the acquisition of resistance to cold through increased expression of numerous cold-responsive (COR) genes. In hos1 mutants, ICE1 is not degraded [3], which leads to the acquisition of cold tolerance via the unified ICE-CBF pathway [6,7]. If HOS1 is a negative regulator of cold stress, acting mainly by inhibiting ICE1 [3,4], then it is a positive regulator of heat stress [8]. In Arabidopsis, the hos1 mutation not only increased cold tolerance, but also induced flavonoid biosynthesis [9].
HOS1 is also involved in light signaling [10,11,12]. HOS1 physically interacts with the zinc-finger protein CONSTANS (CO) to regulate flowering time [10]. To link cold and photoperiodic responses, HOS1 interacts simultaneously with phytochrome B (phyB) and CO [11]. phyB activates HOS1, and HOS1 subsequently inhibits the transcriptional activity of the phytochrome-interacting transcription factor PIF4 [12]. hos1 mutants demonstrated an early flowering phenotype [10] and exhibited elongated hypocotyls [12].
Light plays a significant role in the adaptation of plants to abiotic stresses, and cold and light signaling combine to optimize plant growth and development [13,14,15,16,17]. The balance between ROS production and ROS decomposition, mediated by ROS-scavenging systems, determines the acclimation state. Signaling ROS are generated in a response to stress by NADPH oxidases (Rboh) at the plasma membrane and activate an acclimation response [18]. Besides acclimation, ROS are necessary for rapid systemic signaling. The balance between ROS production and ROS decomposition, mediated by the ROS-scavenging systems, determines the acclimation state. Cold acclimation increases plant tolerance to excessive light by increasing photosynthetic capacity during high light treatment [19,20]. Signaling modules linking cold adaptation to intense light have been summarized by Roeber et al. [17]. phyB plays a role in these links because it perceives both light and ambient temperature signals [15,17]. Cold acclimation transcription factors, CBFs, interact with PIF3 under cold stress, thereby preventing phyB degradation. Cold-stabilized phyB acts downstream of CBFs to positively regulate freezing tolerance by modulating the expression of stress-responsive genes. Devireddy et al. [21] showed that phyB is required for ROS wave initiation after light stress, and phyB acts via Arabidopsis RbohD activation. RbohD and RbohF are both required for local and systemic ROS signaling during light stress [15,17,21].
Although the combination of heat and intense light is more common in plant cultivation, the combination of cold and intense light is also important [22]. We proceeded from the assumption that HOS1 may be involved in the regulation of ROS metabolism, since ROS play an important role in both light and temperature adaptation [13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to study ROS production in WT and hos1Cas9 mutant Arabidopsis plants.
Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-engineered Arabidopsis plants were established, in which frameshift indels were introduced in the first exon of HOS1 [9]. This resulted in the appearance of premature stop codons, which completely disrupted the open reading frame of the gene [9]. These plants, designated as hos1Cas9 plants, were compared with SALK T-DNA insertion mutant plants, line hos1-3 [10]. The hos1-3 mutation is located in the fifth exon and disrupts the HOS1 reading frame at position 912 bp of mRNA, leading to the production of a truncated protein that retains 304 aa of its native form. The hos1Cas9 and hos1-3 mutations similarly increased cold resistance and CBF gene expression, but their effect on secondary metabolism was different [9]. The hos1-3 mutant line was also used in the present work to compare the results.
In the present investigation, hos1Cas9 plants were grown under normal and high light (HL) conditions, with or without cold pre-treatment. hos1Cas9 plants demonstrated different ROS levels compared with WT plants under these treatments. The hos1 mutation caused moderate ROS elevation at normal growth temperatures. In conditions of cold treatment followed by HL treatment, ROS levels decreased, and this process was accompanied by an increase in RbohD and RbohF expression with a concomitant increase in the activity of antioxidant genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The seeds of the A. thaliana wild-type (WT) Col-0 ecotype were purchased from the RIKEN BioResource Research Center (Ibaraki, Japan), while the hos1Cas9 mutant lines were obtained and described by us earlier [9]. In the present study, the hos1-1Cas9 line was used. Surface-sterilized seeds were subjected to cold stratification for 1 day at 4 °C prior to planting on agar plates with half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium and grown under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) in a growth chamber at 25 °C. After 2 weeks, seedlings were planted in the soil to promote rosette production and flowering. Four-week-old plants were used for experiments. HOS1 was disabled by genome editing, resulting in the termination of HOS1 translation, which was confirmed by heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA), high-resolution melting analysis (HRM) and genomic DNA sequencing of stable Arabidopsis hos1Cas9 mutants [9]. The first exon contained a premature stop codon, which completely disrupted the open reading frame of the HOS1 gene [9]. Silencing of the HOS1 protein was also monitored by Western blot before starting the experiments (Supplementary Figure S1). A. thaliana SALK_069312C T-DNA insertion line hos1-3 [10] was purchased from the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA, USA. The hos1-3 line was cultivated using the same conditions.
The callus lines were obtained from leaves of WT and hos1cas9 mutant plants. The control and hos1cas9 calli were cultivated as described [23] using W2,4-D medium supplemented with 0.4 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the dark at 24 °C with 25-day subculture intervals. The W2,4-D medium contained standard Murashige and Skoog macrosalts, microsalts, and Fe-EDTA, with the exception of NH4NO3, the concentration of which was decreased up to 400 mg/L. The following components were added to the W2,4-D medium (mg/L): thiamine-HCl (0.2), nicotinic acid (0.5), pyridoxine-HCl (0.5), meso-inositol (100), peptone (100), sucrose (25000), and agar (6000). All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA, “Tissue Culture Grade”). Transgenic calli were termed according to the number of the original hos1 plants (hos1-1Cas9 line) from which they were originated.

2.2. Experimental Design for High Light Stress Treatment

The experiments were carried out in a specially designed light unit, which was placed in a growth chamber. We used warm white LED lamps that were located at the top of the chamber, and the cool air came from the sides. Based on the literature data, the density of the photosynthetic photon flux (PPFD) was selected at a level of 80 µmol m−2 s−1 as control conditions, and 1200 µmol m−2 s−1 in the experiments for intense illumination, designated here as “high light” (HL) conditions. Plants were exposed to high light treatments for 15, 30, and 60 min, as well as for 2 h. Spectral characteristics of the light-emitting diode lamps used in experiments are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Cold treatment (12 °C) was performed for 24 h under normal light and HL (Supplementary Table S1).

2.3. Laser Confocal Imaging of Intracellular ROS

Measurements of intracellular ROS were performed as previously described [24]. The experiments were based on the ability of plant cells to oxidize fluorogenic dyes to their corresponding fluorescent analogues, allowing for ROS determination in living cells. Epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side were analyzed. The middle part of the leaves, after excision, were cut and incubated in liquid MS/2 medium containing 50 µM 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) or 10 µM dihydrorhodamine 123 (H2R123; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) at 24 ± 1 °C in the dark for 10 min. Subsequently, parts of the leaves were washed twice and placed in the MS/2 medium in a POC chamber (a convenient live cell incubation device). Examination of DCF fluorescence in single living cells was performed with the LSM 510 META confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an argon laser with an effective power of 30 mW and intensity of 3%. DCF fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and detected with a bandpass emission filter at 505–530 nm. Confocal images were recorded in a 40 s time series at intervals of 0.5 ms. The autofluorescence of chloroplasts was recorded with an additional emission channel at 600 nm. The objective was a Plan-Neofluar 40 × 1.3. The maximum intensity projection mode was applied to obtain 2D images from the time series. Video files of the captured images were recorded and analyzed using LSM 510 Release 3.5 software (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and for automatic whole image calculation ZEN2012 software (Blur edition) (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Data were presented as the average of DCF fluorescence intensity and pixels from three separate experiments (30–40 cells were analyzed in each experiment).

2.4. Paraquat and Argon Laser Treatments

Arabidopsis plants were grown for 28 days in control conditions, and then were treated with paraquat (15 μM, final concentration) for 1 h under control conditions or HL. Light stress was caused by continuous illumination of cells with the LSM 510 META Ar laser (excitation at 488 nm) as described [24]. The effective power was 30 mW. The laser intensity was increased by 1.5 times compared to the standard intensity.

2.5. Measurement of Glutathione and Ascorbic Acid

2.5.1. Chemicals

Analytical standards: ascorbic acid (AsA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were obtained from BioChemica (PanReac AppliChem, Ottoweg, Germany). All standard solutions, extraction buffers, and eluents were prepared with Milli-Q water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). HPLC-grade acetonitrile was obtained from PanReac AppliChem (Ottoweg, Germany). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

2.5.2. Sample Preparation for AsA and Glutathione Assays

For sample preparation, 35-day-old Arabidopsis plants were selected for analysis for AsA and glutathione after light treatment. Frozen plant tissues were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and immediately homogenized with two volumes (w/v) of cold (4 °C) extraction solution (2% trifluoroacetic acid). Then, the homogenates were sonicated on ice and centrifuged at 15,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected, filtered through a 0.45 μm nylon membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), and immediately analyzed by LC-UV-MS/MS. All manipulations were carried out in a cold room at 4 °C and protected from light. Each sample was prepared in two replications.

2.5.3. Analytical Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

The LC-UV-MS/MS assays were carried out at the Instrumental Centre of Biotechnology and Gene Engineering of Federal Scientific Center of East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity using a 1260 Infinity analytical HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation was performed using an analytical Zorbax C18 column (150 mm, 2.1 mm i.d., 3.5 μm part size, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in isocratic conditions with a mixture of acetonitrile:water (3:97) with formic acid (0.1%) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 35 °C. UV spectra were obtained with a DAD detector in the range between 200 and 400 nm. Chromatographic data for AsA quantification were recorded at a wavelength of 243 nm. Instrument operation, data collection, and analysis were controlled using the Agilent OpenLAB CDS software (v.01.06.111).
The LC system was interfaced with a mass spectrometer, the Bruker HCT ultra PTM Discovery System (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany), to detect glutathiones in plant tissue samples. The HCT ultra is equipped with a high-capacity ion trap that enables the acquisition of tandem mass spectrometry data of low-abundance precursor ions. The analyses were carried out using electrospray ionization in the mass range ultrascan mode with positive ionic polarity and a detection range of m/z 100–400. The following instrument parameters were applied: the drying gas (N2) flow rate was 8.0 L/min, the nebulizer gas (N2) pressure was 25 psi, the ion source potential was −4.0 kV, and the drying gas temperature was 325 °C. Manual MS/MS acquisition was chosen for quantification of the glutathiones using the following m/z values of isolation masses: 308 for GSH determination and 613 for GSSG. MS data were collected using Bruker Daltonics Compass 1.3 esquire (v.6.2.581.3) management software and processed with Bruker Daltonics Compass 1.3 (v.4.0.234.0) data analysis software.
Quantification was performed by obtaining calibration curves with linear regression (correlation coefficient R2 above 0.997) built at five concentration levels with standards of AsA, GSH, and GSSG. Standard solutions were prepared in 2% trifluoroacetic acid under cold, dark conditions at 4 °C. The following concentration ranges were chosen for calibration: 520–0.1 nmol/mL for GSH, 110–0.1 nmol/mL for GSSG, and 5000–1 nmol/mL for AsA. The calibration was confirmed several times during the analysis.

2.6. RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and PCR Reactions

To isolate total RNA, a LiCl precipitation protocol was used [23]. The integrity and purity of RNA samples were tested using microcapillary electrophoresis chips (Experion, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) as previously described [25]. For first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis from RNA templates (2.5 μg), the oligo-d(T)15 primer (0.5 ng) was used. After heating at 72 °C for 5 min, the solutions were cooled on ice. Following the protocol of Sileks M (Moscow, Russia), reverse transcription was accomplished in a 50 µL reaction mixture containing 200 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase, 1× M-MLV buffer, and 0.24 mM dNTPs. The reaction proceeded at 36 °C for 1 h, followed by 72 °C for 10 min. The cDNA samples were diluted with nuclease-free water at a 1:10 (v/v) ratio. In addition, each RNA sample was tested in the absence of the M-MLV enzyme as a negative (RNA-RT) control.

2.7. Real-Time RT-PCR

A CFX96 (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used with a 2.5 × SYBR green PCR master mix containing ROX as a passive reference dye (Syntol, Moscow, Russia) for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis using the gene-specific primer pairs. The gene-specific primer pairs used in qPCR analysis of ROS-related genes were previously reported [23]. The total 25 µL reaction mixture contained 300 nM primer, 1 µL diluted cDNA, and 2.5 mM MgCl2 in a 96-well reaction plate. For each PCR reaction, the protocol included the following steps: 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, and 30 s at 60 °C. Data were analyzed using CFX Manager Software (Version 1.5; Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). EF-1α (AT5G60390) and GAPDH (AT1G13440) genes showed the most stable expression patterns in all tested experimental sets and were used as internal controls in the relative comparison analysis of the studied genes. To confirm the absence of contamination, RNA-RT and no-template controls were included. Each run was accompanied by melting curve analysis to verify the absence of primer-dimer artifacts or non-specific products. Analysis was performed using two separate experiments (performed in January and March 2022) with three technical replicates.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 10.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), with a statistical significance level of p < 0.05. Two independent categories were compared using the Student’s t-test, while comparisons among multiple groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a multiple comparison protocol. The intergroup comparison was made using Fisher’s protected least significant difference (PLSD) post hoc test.

3. Results

3.1. WT and hos1Cas9 Cells Have Equal ROS Levels in the Dark

To test whether the mutation of the HOS1 gene could cause changes in the ROS level without exposure to light, WT and hos1Cas9 plants were cultivated in the dark for one day. ROS levels were then measured using confocal microscopy with H2DCF-DA. For confocal microscopy analysis, H2DCFDA was selected as a fluorescent dye because it displays the highest signal-to-noise ratio among other commonly used dyes, penetrates cell layers within the leaf, and reacts with several forms of ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, superoxide, and peroxynitrite, ensuring the detection of different types of ROS [26]. The epidermal cells from the abaxial side of leaves were analyzed by confocal microscopy as described in Materials and Methods. WT and mutant plants cultivated in the dark showed the same DCF fluorescence intensity (DFI) at 48.0 ± 2.8 and 49.0 ± 2.7, respectively. DCF fluorescence intensity indicates the total ROS level measured as the sum of hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, superoxide, and peroxynitrite. To confirm this result, we obtained callus cultures from WT and hos1Cas9 plants as described in Materials and Methods. Callus cultures were constantly grown in the dark. The calli were cultivated in liquid medium to obtain single cells and small cell aggregates, and steady-state ROS levels in WT and hos1Cas9 single living cells were monitored using confocal microscopy. This analysis showed that in the absence of light, WT and mutant cells contained equal amounts of ROS, 84 ± 5 and 83 ± 4 DFI in WT and hos1Cas9 cells, respectively.

3.2. WT and hos1Cas9 Plants Have Similar Patterns of ROS Accumulation Inside Cells

Confocal microscopy was used to study the distribution of ROS in the leaves of normal and mutant Arabidopsis plants. In both WT and hos1Cas9 plants growing in control conditions, ROS accumulated predominantly in the cytoplasm along the plasma membrane and in the adjacent areas of the apoplast (Figure 1). In addition, ROS were found in nuclei and vesicles. ROS accumulation was detected in the chloroplast stroma and along chloroplast membranes, as shown in the bottom panel of Figure 1, where ROS and chloroplast luminescence channels were combined. No peculiarities were found in the intracellular distribution of ROS in mutant plants, which indicates that WT and hos1Cas9 plants showed similar patterns of ROS accumulation inside cells.

3.3. ROS Levels in WT Plants

Arabidopsis WT plants were grown in control conditions for 28 days (low light (LL) at 80 µmol m−2 s−1 and normal growth temperature 24 °C), and then analyzed by confocal microscopy. The program LSM 510 Release 3.5 in the counting algorithm takes into account the size of the cells, the ratio of the cytoplasm and vacuoles, the threshold, and calculates the average value and standard error for individual cells but not for the area of the entire image (see Section 2). Confocal laser imaging of intracellular ROS showed that the ROS level in cells of WT plants increased under conditions of HL (Figure 2A). This result was confirmed in additional experiments with dihydrorhodamine 123 (H2R123) as a probe. Rhodamine-based fluorescent probes are mostly sensitive to H2O2 and often used in monitoring intracellular ROS [27]. We found that the content of ROS is increased in wild-type plants under intense illumination (Supplementary Figure S3). In conditions of cold or cold treatment followed by HL, a statistically significant increase in ROS level by 20% was observed in WT plants (Figure 2A).

3.4. ROS Levels in hos1Cas9 Plants

Arabidopsis hos1Cas9 plants were grown for 28 days in control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1) and then analyzed by confocal microscopy. In hos1Cas9 plants, ROS levels were increased in control conditions by 22–27% compared to WT plants (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure S3). Under HL treatment, the ROS content in WT and mutant plants was similar (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure S3). This means that under LL, the mutant plants increased the level of ROS, but when exposed to strong light, they could no longer increase the level of ROS. Under conditions of cold exposure, an opposite trend was observed, such as a decrease in the level of ROS in mutant plants compared to WT plants. The ROS level in hos1Cas9 plants under cold treatment followed by HL was 86% of that in WT plants. Measurements carried out on other mutant plants, line hos1-3 from the SALK collection [10], showed similar trends (Supplementary Figure S4). These results show that the hos1 mutation increases ROS level, but cold treatment attenuates this effect.

3.5. Dynamics of ROS Accumulation under High Light Conditions

3.5.1. The hos1 Mutation Has a Biphasic Effect on the Level of ROS

Previous experiments have shown that the hos1Cas9 mutation can alter ROS levels regardless of cold exposure (Figure 2). Next, we measured ROS levels under HL over a time series ranging from 15 min to 2 h. Under intense illumination of WT plants, the ROS level rapidly increased up to 15 min, and then stabilized at a constant level (Figure 3A). On the contrary, in hos1 plants, a decrease in the level of ROS was observed in the first 15 min and then increased, reaching a plateau by the 60th min (Figure 3A).
To study the first phase of ROS decline, we examined ROS levels in individual cells, using 2-min intervals (Figure 3B). Epidermal cells of WT and hos1Cas9 plants were stressed using the Ar laser (488 nm) with increased intensity (see Materials and Methods). The laser intensity was chosen to cause an increase in ROS but not cell damage. ROS accumulation was initially evident at the periphery of the cells and subsequently spread throughout, excluding the vacuoles. A gradual rise in ROS levels was observed for most studied WT cells during the first 10 min, after which the level of ROS stabilized (Supplementary Figure S5). Cells of hos1Cas9 plants demonstrated completely different trends (Figure 3B). A rapid ROS accumulation was observed in some cells of hos1Cas9 plants for 30 s before the ROS content dropped significantly.
Both of these experiments show a biphasic effect of hos1 mutation on ROS levels, i.e., an initial drop and then an increase in ROS levels. We interpreted these data in the sense that HOS1 is required to maintain steady-state ROS levels under strong illumination.

3.5.2. The hos1Cas9 Mutation Prevents the Rise in ROS Levels Caused by Paraquat

Since the decrease in ROS in mutant plants below the norm in the first 15 min of HL illumination could be due to the fact that the mutant plants were better prepared for HL treatment (for example, by the presence of a pre-existing pool of antioxidants), we treated WT and mutant plants with paraquat to cause ROS induction. The herbicide paraquat acts as a terminal oxidant of photosystem I. In light, it reduces oxygen to the superoxide radical, which subsequently dismutates to hydrogen peroxide, inducing stable ROS elevation in treated plant tissues [28]. In Arabidopsis plants, a 25 μM paraquat treatment induced rapid and severe oxidative stress [29].
The experimental setup used in our experiment included moderate treatment conditions (15 μM paraquat and 1 h of light incubation), in which paraquat caused a 1.5-fold increase in ROS in WT plants but did not lead to cell death. As shown in Figure 4, paraquat caused an increase in the ROS content in the cells of WT and hos1Cas9 plants under LL. HL attenuated paraquat-induced ROS generation in both plant lines. However, this effect on the mutant line was more pronounced. This indicates that the mutant plants generated a stronger antioxidant defense response when treated with HL compared to the wild-type plants. Since paraquat treatment leads to the weakening of chloroplast defense mechanisms, including the rapid oxidation of ascorbate and glutathione [30], the antioxidant status was measured.

3.5.3. Antioxidant Status

ROS is mitigated by an array of ROS-scavenging enzymes and pathways, such as Fe- and CuZn-SODs and the glutathione–ascorbate cycle, as well as high concentrations of antioxidants such as ascorbic acid and reduced glutathione (GSH) [31]. The reduction of H2O2 via the ascorbate–glutathione pathway is thought to be the major mechanism leading to oxidized glutathione (GSSG) accumulation in plants [31,32]. The balance between GSH and GSSG is a central factor in maintaining the cellular redox state [33]. When the intensity of a stress increases, GSH concentrations decline, and the redox state becomes more oxidized, leading to the deterioration of the system. Measurements of antioxidants were carried out by LC-UV-MS/MS as described in Materials and Methods (see also Supplementary Figure S6).
Measurements of GSH and GSSG, and calculation of their ratios showed that under 15-min HL treatment, both WT and hos1Cas9 plants significantly decreased GSH levels and increased GSSG levels (Table 1). This result is in good agreement with the data of Haber et al. [32] indicating that the chloroplastic glutathione redox potential was rapidly decreased (within minutes) when Arabidopsis plants were shifted from 120 µmol m−2 s−1 to high light intensity. Glutathione oxidation resulted in a decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio from 12 to 2.1 for WT plants and from 17 to 3.8 for hos1Cas9 plants. However, under 2-h HL illumination, both WT and mutant plants partially restored the reduced glutathione pool and returned to the initial GSH/GSSG ratios. According to the literature data, Arabidopsis leaves in normal physiological conditions contain 152–263 nmol g−1 FW of GSH and 21–75 nmol g−1 FW of GSSG, thus maintaining the GSH/GSSG ratio in the range of 2.0–12.5 [34]. Our data imply that when exposed to strong light, Arabidopsis plants rapidly deplete the pool of reduced glutathione at first but then adapt to light stress. The difference in the content of GSH in normal and mutant plants is significant and lies in the fact that mutant plants contain 1.3 times less GSH. However, since the dynamics of depletion and recovery are similar between WT and hos1Cas9 plants, we concluded that the hos1 gene mutation does not change the redox balance in this parameter.
Arabidopsis plants (ecotype Col-0) normally contain ascorbic acid (AsA) at a level between 2 and 3 µmol g−1 FW (2000 and 3000 nmol g−1 FW; [35,36]). The HPLC/MS measurements of AsA levels showed 2087 nmol g−1 FW of AsA in WT plants (Table 1). In hos1Cas9 plants, the level of AcA was twice as high and amounted to 4213 nmol g−1 FW. This may be a compensation for reduced GSH levels in hos1Cas9 plants, resembling an effect previously observed by Müller-Moulé et al. [37], when the lack of one reducing agent is compensated by another. A decrease in the concentration of AsA in mutant plants should be noted at a 15-min HL exposure. Under two hours of HL irradiation, both plant lines accumulated more AsA, reaching 5539 and 5534 nmol g−1 FW of AsA in WT plants and hos1Cas9 plants, respectively. This corresponds to the literature data, which indicate that under strong light, the content of AsA in Arabidopsis increases [37,38]. Thus, the hos1 mutation significantly increases AsA content but generally disrupts normal GSH and AsA levels in both control and HL conditions, indicating that HOS1 is required to maintain normal redox homeostasis.

3.6. NADPH Oxidase Gene Expression

ROS are generated in a response to stress by NADPH oxidases (Rboh) at the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis plants, and enhanced photoprotection occurs due to the induction of an apoplastic H2O2 burst by activating NADPH oxidase expression [39]. Two NADPH oxidases, RbohD and RbohF, play the most important role in light acclimation [21,40]. The different systemic responses observed during HL-induced acclimation could be divided into RBOHD-dependent and RBOHD-independent responses [41]. The hypothesis that the hos1 mutation affects the expression of genes encoding NADPH oxidases was tested by qPCR. The analysis showed that, in control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1), the expression of RbohD and RbohF was similar in WT and hos1Cas9 Arabidopsis plants (Figure 5). Similarly, light or cold acting separately did not significantly affect RbohD and RbohF expression. However, when plants were pre-exposed to cold and further exposed to HL, the expression of RbohD and RbohF was significantly increased in hos1Cas9 plants but not in WT plants.

3.7. Intense Light Has Little Effect on the Expression of Genes Involved in ROS Detoxification

Because ascorbate peroxidase (APX) relies on electrons from reduced glutathione, channeled to APX through the ascorbate–glutathione cycle [31], we measured the expression level of genes encoding APX and other ROS-detoxifying enzymes. The detection of sustained, moderately elevated ROS levels usually means that the expression of ROS-generating enzymes is compensated by the antioxidant system [41,42]. Enzymatic ROS-scavenging mechanisms include the induction of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT) [43]. Using qPCR, we tested whether marker genes, such as Apx1, Apx2, Apx3, CSD1, CSD2, CSD3, and CAT1, were activated or inhibited in hos1Cas9 plants. qPCR measurements showed almost complete insensitivity of these marker genes to the hos1 mutation when plants were cultivated under normal temperature conditions (Figure 5). At the same time, an increase in illumination (HL conditions) slightly stimulated the expression of Apx2 and CSD3 in hos1Cas9 plants compared to WT plants (Figure 5).

3.8. Cold Significantly Activates Expression of Genes Encoding Ascorbate Peroxidases

When WT and hos1Cas9 plants were cultivated in the cold, the expression of Apx1 and Apx2 increased significantly (Figure 5). This was especially noticeable for Apx1. The level of Apx1 transcripts increased in the cold 10-fold and 16-fold in WT and mutant plants, respectively, compared with normal cultivation conditions. Only Apx3 did not change the level of expression under the influence of cold. The expression of CSD1 increased sixfold in hos1Cas9 versus WT plants. The hos1 mutation had no effect on CSD2 or CSD3 expression (Figure 5).
A 24-h cold treatment followed by intense illumination led to a state in which the expression of Apx1 and Apx2 genes in WT plants was almost at the basal level under normal conditions. The hos1 mutation eliminated this effect, causing a significant increase in the expression of Apx1 and Apx2. In mutant plants, Apx1 and Apx2 appear to be induced as a response to increased ROS levels produced via enhanced RbohD and RbohF expression. In contrast to the Apx1 and Apx2 genes, CSD genes were not significantly affected by the hos1 mutation under cold with HL treatment. Based on these findings, we concluded that the hos1 mutation has an activatory effect on the expression of CSD1 under cold conditions and Apx1 and Apx2 under cold conditions, followed by HL.

4. Discussion

The basal level of ROS is necessary for normal plant development and maintaining the basal level of ROS below the cytotoxic level but above the cytostatic level is an important biological process [44,45]. In this work, we studied the effect of the hos1 mutation on ROS content in A. thaliana WT and hos1Cas9 mutant plants. Our goal was to attenuate the functioning of the pleiotropic regulator HOS1, which is required for adaptation of plant development to environmental temperature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], and to see against this background if HOS1 manifests its effects through ROS modulation.
The hos1Cas9 mutant plants showed complex dynamics of ROS accumulation depending on external stimuli. In the absence of light and at normal growth temperatures, the level of ROS does not change in mutant plants relative to WT plants. The level of ROS was affected differently by cold or light. LL and HL caused an increase in ROS in hos1Cas9 plants, similarly affecting ROS production (Figure 2), while cold caused processes similar to acclimation, which led to the stabilization of ROS at a lower level compared with WT plants (Figure 2).
The cold-dependent way of regulating ROS metabolism in hos1Cas9 plants was most pronounced when plants were exposed to cold and then to HL. Figure 6 shows the putative pattern of HOS1-mediated signaling when Arabilopsis plants are exposed to cold and strong light. Under these conditions, WT plants did not maintain the initial ROS level, and the ROS level increased (Figure 2A). However, hos1Cas9 plants treated with cold followed by HL maintained a low level of ROS (Figure 2A). This effect was accompanied by an increased expression of RbohD and RbohF and a concomitant increase in the expression of Apx1 and Apx2 (Figure 5). Probably, the initial rise of ROS, initiated by increased expression of RbohD and RbohF, was compensated by ascorbate peroxidases. Several studies [18,39,40] reported that RbohD and RbohF play important roles in cold and light acclimation. Since the maintenance of an optimal level of ROS is necessary for the proper functioning of cells [44], HOS1 can serve as a limiting factor to prevent intense changes in the level of ROS. This can be implemented using the mechanism proposed by Davletova et al. [46], where RbohD is involved in the Apx1 signaling pathway as a positive amplification factor that maintains the expression of Apx1 transcripts at a high stationary level.
While the effect of the hos1 mutation on light signaling components and the relationship between photoperiodic flowering and cold in hos1 mutant plants have been previously shown [10,11,12], the effect of HL on hos1-mutated plants was identified for the first time in this study. The adaptation processes of hos1Cas9 plants to intense light are different from those caused by cold. Increased ROS production is not accompanied by the induction of pro- and antioxidant genes (Figure 5). Rather, hos1Cas9 plants demonstrate pre-formed antioxidant defense. It is known that light illumination leads to the formation of reduced forms of oxygen, such as superoxide and excited chlorophyll molecules, which generate singlet oxygen. Superoxide can be converted into hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals. These light-induced ROS are amplified when the absorption of light energy becomes excessive relative to the photosynthetic activity [43,47]. The first line of defense against excessive ROS is the nonenzymatic ROS-scavenging mechanism, which include scavengers such as ascorbate, glutathione, carotenoids, tocopherol, and flavonoids [43].
We suggest that the hos1 mutation activates the first line of defense against HL. This is supported by several observations: (1) Changes in ROS levels in hos1Cas9 plants are rapid processes occurring within minutes, including biphasic fluctuations in ROS levels (Figure 3). Such rapid responses could be explained by the depletion of a pre-existing pool of antioxidants. (2) Under HL conditions, paraquat did not increase the accumulation of ROS (Figure 4), which can be explained by the presence of a high pool of antioxidants. (3) hos1Cas9 plants contain a high content of ascorbic acid (Table 1) and (4) hos1Cas9 plants contain a high content of flavonoids [9].
It is clear that the influence of the HOS1 gene on ROS can be associated with various regulatory mechanisms, including both ABA signaling and cues from the light signaling system. The most promising for further study are the regulatory modules HOS1—‖ICE1—‖ABI5→RbohD/F and HOS1—‖PIF4→ABI5→RbohD/F, which may have an overlap in ROS regulation via ABI5 function [48]. Similarly, the HOS1-RBOHD/F-ROS-ENO2-CBF signaling chain may explain how HOS1 activates plant cold response through ENOLASE2 (ENO2), given the recently discovered role of ENO2 in cold adaptation [49].

5. Conclusions

Changes in ROS levels mediated by the hos1 mutation seem to have complex behavior due to the cross-talk of several levels of regulation. Such levels of regulation could be the influence of the gene mutation itself, the compensatory mechanisms of plants, and the participation of signaling pathways triggered by external stimuli, such as cold or light. It is possible that HOS1 prevents the overinduction of defense mechanisms to balance growth. HOS1 is required to maintain ROS homeostasis not only under cold conditions, but also under conditions of both low and high light intensity. It is likely that HOS1 affects ROS metabolism through different mechanisms under cold or HL conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life13020524/s1, Reference [50] are cited in the supplementary materials. Table S1: Experimental design; Figure S1: Spectral characteristics of the light-emitting diode lamps used; Figure S2: Suppression of HOS1 in hos1Cas9 A. thaliana plants; Figure S3: ROS content in epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side of wild-type (WT), and hos1Cas9 lines of A. thaliana plants measured with dihydrorhodamine 123; Figure S4: ROS content in epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side of wild-type (WT), and hos1-3 lines mutant from the SALK collection of A. thaliana plants; Figure S5: Dynamics of ROS accumulation in epidermal cells of WT and hos1Cas9 plants under high-intensity argon laser illumination; Figure S6: HPLC chromatograms of ascorbic acid (ASA), reduced and oxidized glutathione (GSH and GSSG) in Arabidopsis WT and hos1Cas9 plants at the control condition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, project administration, supervision, V.P.B., Y.N.S., T.Y.G., G.N.V. and Y.N.K.; investigation, methodology, formal analysis, validation, visualization, and writing—original draft, Y.A.Y., Y.N.S., T.Y.G., G.N.V., T.V.R., Y.V.V., E.P.S., A.A.M., E.P.S., V.P.G. and D.V.B.; funding acquisition, V.P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation [grant number 20-16-00016].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The analyses described in this work were performed using equipment from the Instrumental Centre for Biotechnology and Gene Engineering at the Federal Scientific Centre of East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. MacGregor, D.R.; Penfield, S. Exploring the pleiotropy of hos1. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1661–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, H.; Xiong, L.; Gong, Z.; Ishitani, M.; Stevenson, B.; Zhu, J.-K. The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 912–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dong, C.-H.; Agarwal, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Q.; Zhu, J.-K. The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 8281–8286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ding, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Q.; Gong, Z.; Yang, S. OST1 kinase modulates freezing tolerance by enhancing ICE1 stability in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 2015, 32, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ye, K.; Li, H.; Ding, Y.; Shi, Y.; Song, C.; Gong, Z.; Yanga, S. BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE2 negatively regulates the stability of transcription factor ICE1 in response to cold stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 2682–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chinnusamy, V.; Ohta, M.; Kanrar, S.; Lee, B.; Hong, X.; Agarwal, M.; Zhu, J.-K. ICE1: A regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, Y.S.; Lee, M.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Park, C.-M. The unified ICE-CBF pathway provides a transcriptional feedback control of freezing tolerance during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 89, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, S.-H.; Park, Y.-J.; Park, C.-M. HOS1 activates DNA repair systems to enhance plant thermotolerance. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 1439–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shkryl, Y.; Yugay, Y.; Avramenko, T.; Grigorchuk, V.; Gorpenchenko, T.; Grischenko, O.; Bulgakov, V. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of HOS1 reveals its role in the regulation of secondary metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants 2021, 10, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lazaro, A.; Valverde, F.; Piñeiro, M.; Jarillo, J.A. The Arabidopsis E3 ubiquitin ligase HOS1 negatively regulates CONSTANS abundance in the photoperiodic control of flowering. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 982–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Lazaro, A.; Mouriz, A.; Piñeiro, M.; Jarillo, J.A. Red light-mediated degradation of CONSTANS by the E3 ubiquitin ligase HOS1 regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2437–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Jung, J.-H.; Lee, S.; Park, C.-M. HOS1 facilitates the phytochrome B-mediated inhibition of PIF4 function during hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2017, 10, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Catalá, R.; Medina, J.; Salinas, J. Integration of low temperature and light signaling during cold acclimation response in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 16475–16480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Franklin, K.A.; Toledo-Ortiz, G.; Pyott, D.E.; Halliday, K.J. Interaction of light and temperature signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 2859–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jiang, B.; Shi, Y.; Peng, Y.; Jia, Y.; Yan, Y.; Dong, X.; Li, H.; Dong, J.; Li, J.; Gong, Z.; et al. Cold-induced CBF-PIF3 interaction enhances freezing tolerance by stabilizing the phyB thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2020, 13, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, D.; Deng, X.W. CBF-phyB-PIF module links light and low temperature signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 952–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roeber, V.M.; Bajaj, I.; Rohde, M.; Schmülling, T.; Cortleven, A. Light acts as a stressor and influences abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 645–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sane, P.V.; Ivanov, A.G.; Hurry, V.; Huner, N.P.A.; Öquist, G. Changes in the redox potential of primary and secondary electron-accepting quinones in photosystem II confer increased resistance to photoinhibition in low-temperature-acclimated Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 2144–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rapacz, M.; Wolanin, B.; Hura, K.; Tyrka, M. The effects of cold acclimation on photosynthetic apparatus and the expression of COR14b in four genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare) contrasting in their tolerance to freezing and high-light treatment in cold conditions. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Devireddy, A.R.; Liscum, E.; Mittler, R. Phytochrome B is required for systemic stomatal responses and reactive oxygen species signaling during light stress. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 1563–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, J.; Zhao, X.; Chory, J. The Arabidopsis transcriptome responds specifically and dynamically to high light stress. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 4186–4199.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shkryl, Y.; Veremeichik, G.; Avramenko, T.; Gorpenchenko, T.; Tchernoded, G.; Bulgakov, V. Transcriptional regulation of enzymes involved in ROS metabolism and abiotic stress resistance in rolC-transformed cell cultures. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bulgakov, V.P.; Aminin, D.L.; Shkryl, Y.N.; Gorpenchenko, T.Y.; Veremeichik, G.N.; Dmitrenok, P.S.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. Suppression of reactive oxygen species and enhanced stress tolerance in Rubia cordifolia cells expressing the rolC oncogene. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 1561–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bulgakov, V.P.; Gorpenchenko, T.Y.; Veremeichik, G.N.; Shkryl, Y.N.; Tchernoded, G.K.; Bulgakov, D.V.; Aminin, D.L.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. The rolB gene suppresses reactive oxygen species in transformed plant cells through the sustained activation of antioxidant defense. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1371–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fichman, Y.; Miller, G.; Mittler, R. Whole-plant live imaging of reactive oxygen species. Mol Plant. 2019, 12, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krieger, G.; Shkolnik, D.; Miller, G.; Fromm, H. Reactive oxygen species tune root tropic responses. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1209–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hawkes, T.R. Mechanisms of resistance to paraquat in plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Benina, M.; Ribeiro, D.M.; Gechev, T.S.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Schippers, J.H.M. A cell type specific view on the translation of mRNAs from ROS-responsive genes upon paraquat treatment of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, F.; Brosché, M.; Shapiguzov, A.; He, X.-Q.; Vainonen, J.P.; Leppälä, J.; Trottae, A.; Kangasjärvi, S.; Salojärvi, J.; Kangasjärvi, J.; et al. Interaction of methyl viologen-induced chloroplast and mitochondrial signalling in Arabidopsis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 134, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Ascorbate and glutathione: The heart of the redox Hub1. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Haber, Z.; Lampl, N.; Meyer, A.J.; Zelinger, E.; Hipsch, M.; Rosenwasser, S. Resolving diurnal dynamics of the chloroplastic glutathione redox state in Arabidopsis reveals its photosynthetically derived oxidation. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1828–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: A re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1056–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vanhoudt, N.; Vandenhove, H.; Horemans, N.; Bello, D.M.; Hees, M.V.; Wannijn, J.; Carleer, R.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. Uranium induced effects on development and mineral nutrition of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Nutr. 2011, 34, 1940–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kavkova, E.I.; Blochl, C.; Tenhaken, R. The Myo-inositol pathway does not contribute to ascorbic acid synthesis. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kakan, X.; Yu, Y.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Huang, R.; Wang, J. Ascorbic acid modulation by ABI4 transcriptional repression of VTC2 in the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Müller-Moulé, P.; Golan, T.; Niyogi, K.K. Ascorbate-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis grow in high light despite chronic photooxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bartoli, C.G.; Yu, J.; Gómez, F.; Fernández, L.; McIntosh, L.; Foyer, C.H. Inter-relationships between light and respiration in the control of ascorbic acid synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, F.; Wu, N.; Zhang, L.; Ahammed, G.J.; Chen, X.; Xiang, X.; Zhou, J.; Xia, X.; Shi, K.; Yu, J.; et al. Light signaling-dependent regulation of photoinhibition and photoprotection in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1311–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Mittler, R. Vascular bundles mediate systemic reactive oxygen signaling during light stress. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3425–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mullineaux, P.; Ball, L.; Escobar, C.; Karpinska, B.; Creissen, G.; Karpinski, S. Are diverse signalling pathways integrated in the regulation of Arabidopsis antioxidant defence gene expression in response to excess excitation energy? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2000, 355, 1531–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mullineaux, P.M.; Exposito-Rodriguez, M.; Laissue, P.P.; Smirnoff, N. ROS-dependent signalling pathways in plants and algae exposed to high light: Comparisons with other eukaryotes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 122, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mittler, R. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Tognetti, V.B.; Vandepoele, K.; Gollery, M.; Shulaev, V.; Breusegem, F.V. ROS signaling: The new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Davletova, S.; Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Shengqiang, Z.; Oliver, D.J.; Coutu, J.; Shulaev, V.; Schlauch, K.; Mittler, R. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Asada, K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bulgakov, V.P.; Koren, O.G. Basic protein modules combining abscisic acid and light signaling in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 808960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, W.-C.; Song, R.-F.; Qiu, Y.-M.; Zheng, S.-Q.; Li, T.-T.; Wu, Y.; Song, C.-P.; Lu, Y.-T.; Yuan, H.-M. Sulfenylation of ENOLASE2 facilitates H2O2-conferred freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 2022, 57, 1883–1898.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bulgakov, V.P.; Vereshchagina, Y.V.; Bulgakov, D.V.; Veremeichik, G.N.; Shkryl, Y.N. The rolB plant oncogene affects multiple signaling protein modules related to hormone signaling and plant defense. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Life 13 00524 g001 550
Figure 1. A representative view of ROS localization in epidermal cells of WT and hos1Cas9 plants. The upper panel shows cell images using two merged channels: the “ROS channel,” in which DCF fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and detected at 505–530 nm, in combination with the “chloroplast channel.” The chloroplast channel represents chloroplast autofluorescence, which was recorded using an emission channel at 600 nm. Chloroplasts are visible as red organelles with green inclusions reflecting ROS localization. White arrows indicate ROS localization in the nucleus (green color), pink arrows indicate chloroplasts (red color), and blue arrows indicate vesicles with ROS (green color). Two bottom panels show images of WT and hos1Cas9 epidermal cells in a single ROS detection channel (left) and the same cells in merged ROS and chloroplast channels (on the right). The scale bars are 50 µm.
Figure 1. A representative view of ROS localization in epidermal cells of WT and hos1Cas9 plants. The upper panel shows cell images using two merged channels: the “ROS channel,” in which DCF fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and detected at 505–530 nm, in combination with the “chloroplast channel.” The chloroplast channel represents chloroplast autofluorescence, which was recorded using an emission channel at 600 nm. Chloroplasts are visible as red organelles with green inclusions reflecting ROS localization. White arrows indicate ROS localization in the nucleus (green color), pink arrows indicate chloroplasts (red color), and blue arrows indicate vesicles with ROS (green color). Two bottom panels show images of WT and hos1Cas9 epidermal cells in a single ROS detection channel (left) and the same cells in merged ROS and chloroplast channels (on the right). The scale bars are 50 µm.
Life 13 00524 g001
Life 13 00524 g002 550
Figure 2. ROS content in epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side of wild-type (WT) plants, hos1Cas9 lines of A. thaliana plants. The plants were loaded with H2DCF-DA, and the fluorescence of DCF was visualized by laser-scanning confocal microscopy under control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1), high light (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h), cold conditions (12 °C for 24 h/80 µmol m−2 s−1), and high light conditions after cold pre-treatment (12 °C for 24 h, followed by 1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h). (A) ROS levels are presented as the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. Different letters above the bars indicate significantly different means (p < 0.05; Fisher’s LSD). (B) A representative view of epidermal cells of wild-type (WT) plants and hos1Cas9 A. thaliana plants loaded with H2DCF-DA. The brightness of the green fluorescence reflects intracellular ROS abundance. The scale bars are 50 µm.
Figure 2. ROS content in epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side of wild-type (WT) plants, hos1Cas9 lines of A. thaliana plants. The plants were loaded with H2DCF-DA, and the fluorescence of DCF was visualized by laser-scanning confocal microscopy under control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1), high light (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h), cold conditions (12 °C for 24 h/80 µmol m−2 s−1), and high light conditions after cold pre-treatment (12 °C for 24 h, followed by 1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h). (A) ROS levels are presented as the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. Different letters above the bars indicate significantly different means (p < 0.05; Fisher’s LSD). (B) A representative view of epidermal cells of wild-type (WT) plants and hos1Cas9 A. thaliana plants loaded with H2DCF-DA. The brightness of the green fluorescence reflects intracellular ROS abundance. The scale bars are 50 µm.
Life 13 00524 g002
Life 13 00524 g003 550
Figure 3. The hos1Cas9 mutation has a biphasic effect on the level of ROS under HL illumination. Before these experiments, plants were grown at control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1). (A) ROS dynamics during the 2-h incubation of Arabidopsis plants at intense light 1200 µmol m−2 s−1. A statistically significant difference from the mean of two replicates was observed at 15-, 60-, and 120-min intervals (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05). (B) Different dynamics of ROS accumulation in WT and hos1Cas9 plants epidermal cells under high-intensity argon laser illumination. X-axis shows DCF fluorescence; Y-axis shows time in minutes. Each color line represents DCF fluorescence in the region of interest (ROI) of an individual cell. Approximately half of the hos1Cas9-mutant cells initially show high levels of ROS, but then the ROS content steadily decreases. Full 15-min scans and ROI of the analyzed cells are presented in Supplemental Figure S5.
Figure 3. The hos1Cas9 mutation has a biphasic effect on the level of ROS under HL illumination. Before these experiments, plants were grown at control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1). (A) ROS dynamics during the 2-h incubation of Arabidopsis plants at intense light 1200 µmol m−2 s−1. A statistically significant difference from the mean of two replicates was observed at 15-, 60-, and 120-min intervals (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05). (B) Different dynamics of ROS accumulation in WT and hos1Cas9 plants epidermal cells under high-intensity argon laser illumination. X-axis shows DCF fluorescence; Y-axis shows time in minutes. Each color line represents DCF fluorescence in the region of interest (ROI) of an individual cell. Approximately half of the hos1Cas9-mutant cells initially show high levels of ROS, but then the ROS content steadily decreases. Full 15-min scans and ROI of the analyzed cells are presented in Supplemental Figure S5.
Life 13 00524 g003
Life 13 00524 g004 550
Figure 4. ROS levels in epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side of WT and hos1Cas9 lines of A. thaliana plants treated with 10 μM paraquat under low and high light conditions. Data were obtained using confocal microscopy. The plants were loaded with H2DCF-DA, and the fluorescence of DCF was visualized by laser-scanning confocal microscopy under control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1) and high light (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h). ROS levels are presented as the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. Different letters above the bars indicate significantly different means (p < 0.05; Fisher’s LSD).
Figure 4. ROS levels in epidermal cells from the abaxial leaf side of WT and hos1Cas9 lines of A. thaliana plants treated with 10 μM paraquat under low and high light conditions. Data were obtained using confocal microscopy. The plants were loaded with H2DCF-DA, and the fluorescence of DCF was visualized by laser-scanning confocal microscopy under control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1) and high light (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h). ROS levels are presented as the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. Different letters above the bars indicate significantly different means (p < 0.05; Fisher’s LSD).
Life 13 00524 g004
Life 13 00524 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression of Rboh genes and genes encoding ROS-detoxifying enzymes in WT and hos1Cas9 plants. The genes encoding ROS-detoxifying enzymes are presented by superoxide dismutase (SOD, CSD1-3), ascorbate peroxidase (APX1-3), and catalase (Cat1). Data are presented as the mean ± SE from the analysis of two different experiments with three technical replicates. Different letters above the bars indicate significantly different means (p < 0.05; Fisher’s LSD). CC, control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1); HL, high light (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h); C, cold conditions (12 °C for 24 h/80 µmol m−2 s−1); C + HL, cold and high light conditions (12 °C for 24 h, followed by 1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h).
Figure 5. Expression of Rboh genes and genes encoding ROS-detoxifying enzymes in WT and hos1Cas9 plants. The genes encoding ROS-detoxifying enzymes are presented by superoxide dismutase (SOD, CSD1-3), ascorbate peroxidase (APX1-3), and catalase (Cat1). Data are presented as the mean ± SE from the analysis of two different experiments with three technical replicates. Different letters above the bars indicate significantly different means (p < 0.05; Fisher’s LSD). CC, control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1); HL, high light (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h); C, cold conditions (12 °C for 24 h/80 µmol m−2 s−1); C + HL, cold and high light conditions (12 °C for 24 h, followed by 1200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 2 h).
Life 13 00524 g005
Life 13 00524 g006 550
Figure 6. A working model showing putative signal transduction mediated by the HOS1 protein under cold exposure and strong lighting. It can be supposed (?) that when exposed to cold and strong light, HOS1 stabilizes the content of ROS by blocking its generation through NADPH oxidases (RbohD/F). As a result, there is no increased generation of ROS and no activation of ROS-regulated expression of ascorbate peroxidases Apx1 and Apx2. Inactivation of HOS1 removes (X) this regulatory block. The expression of RbohD/F activates the pathway of ROS-regulated expression of Apx1 and Apx2, which leads to a decrease in the content of ROS by active ROS decomposition.
Figure 6. A working model showing putative signal transduction mediated by the HOS1 protein under cold exposure and strong lighting. It can be supposed (?) that when exposed to cold and strong light, HOS1 stabilizes the content of ROS by blocking its generation through NADPH oxidases (RbohD/F). As a result, there is no increased generation of ROS and no activation of ROS-regulated expression of ascorbate peroxidases Apx1 and Apx2. Inactivation of HOS1 removes (X) this regulatory block. The expression of RbohD/F activates the pathway of ROS-regulated expression of Apx1 and Apx2, which leads to a decrease in the content of ROS by active ROS decomposition.
Life 13 00524 g006
Table
Table 1. Content of reduced and oxidized glutathione (GSH and GSSG) and ascorbic acid in WT and hos1Cas9 plants in control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1) and HL conditions (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1). The data are presented as nmol/g fresh weight ± SE from two separate experiments.
Table 1. Content of reduced and oxidized glutathione (GSH and GSSG) and ascorbic acid in WT and hos1Cas9 plants in control conditions (24 °C/80 µmol m−2 s−1) and HL conditions (24 °C/1200 µmol m−2 s−1). The data are presented as nmol/g fresh weight ± SE from two separate experiments.
Control ConditionsHL, 15 MinHL, 120 Min
WThos1Cas9WThos1Cas9WThos1Cas9
Ascorbic acid2087 ± 3124213 ± 475210 ± 603108 ± 2495539 ± 855374 ± 166
GSH258 ± 28199 ± 16121 ± 17125 ± 15157 ± 8161 ± 14
GSSG20.9 ± 2.911.6 ± 1.556.6 ± 7.232.8 ± 2.210.5 ± 0.813.1 ± 1.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gorpenchenko, T.Y.; Veremeichik, G.N.; Shkryl, Y.N.; Yugay, Y.A.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Bulgakov, D.V.; Rusapetova, T.V.; Vereshchagina, Y.V.; Mironova, A.A.; Subbotin, E.P.; et al. Suppression of the HOS1 Gene Affects the Level of ROS Depending on Light and Cold. Life 2023, 13, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020524

AMA Style

Gorpenchenko TY, Veremeichik GN, Shkryl YN, Yugay YA, Grigorchuk VP, Bulgakov DV, Rusapetova TV, Vereshchagina YV, Mironova AA, Subbotin EP, et al. Suppression of the HOS1 Gene Affects the Level of ROS Depending on Light and Cold. Life. 2023; 13(2):524. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gorpenchenko, Tatiana Y., Galina N. Veremeichik, Yurii N. Shkryl, Yulia A. Yugay, Valeria P. Grigorchuk, Dmitry V. Bulgakov, Tatiana V. Rusapetova, Yulia V. Vereshchagina, Anastasiya A. Mironova, Evgeniyy P. Subbotin, and et al. 2023. "Suppression of the HOS1 Gene Affects the Level of ROS Depending on Light and Cold" Life 13, no. 2: 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020524

APA Style

Gorpenchenko, T. Y., Veremeichik, G. N., Shkryl, Y. N., Yugay, Y. A., Grigorchuk, V. P., Bulgakov, D. V., Rusapetova, T. V., Vereshchagina, Y. V., Mironova, A. A., Subbotin, E. P., Kulchin, Y. N., & Bulgakov, V. P. (2023). Suppression of the HOS1 Gene Affects the Level of ROS Depending on Light and Cold. Life, 13(2), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop