Next Article in Journal
First Use of Non-Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation in Motor Rehabilitation of Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Previous Article in Journal
Key Factors in Early Diagnosis of Myopia Progression within Ocular Biometric Parameters by Scheimpflug Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exogenous γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Application Mitigates Salinity Stress in Maize Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/life13020448
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Potassium Humate and Salicylic Acid to Mitigate Salinity Stress of Common Bean

by
Hossam S. El-Beltagi
1,2,*,
Hala Hazam Al-Otaibi
3,
Aditya Parmar
4,
Khaled M. A. Ramadan
5,6,
Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato
7 and
Mohamed M. El-Mogy
8,*
1
Agricultural Biotechnology Department, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
2
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Gamma Street, Giza 12613, Egypt
3
Food and Nutrition Science Department, Agricultural Science and Food, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
4
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
5
Central Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11241, Egypt
7
Nucleo de Pesquisa Vegetal Basica e Aplicada, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazonia, Paragominas 68627-450, Para, Brazil
8
Vegetable Crops Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(2), 448; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020448
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 3 February 2023 / Published: 5 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Particular Strategies to Combat the Harmful Impacts of Salinization in Plants: Sodification and Alkalinity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the current study, we investigated the effect of potassium humate (Kh) and salicylic acid (SA) in mitigating the salinity stress of common bean plants. Common bean seedlings were treated with 0.2 g/L SA as a foliar application and 0.3 g/L Kh as a soil application individually or in combination. After 7 days of germination, plants were treated with 50 mM NaCl and normal water as a control. Our results indicate that salt treatment reduced the plant growth (fresh and dry shoots and roots), leaf pigments (total chlorophyll and carotenoids), ascorbic acid (AA), glutathione (GSH), and potassium (K) contents. On the contrary, proline content; sodium (Na); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); superoxide anion (O2•−); and antioxidant enzymes, including catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), were increased by saline stress. However, applying either individual Kh and SA or their combination stimulated seedling growth under salinity stress by increasing growth parameters, leaf pigment contents, AA, GSH, proline content, K content, and antioxidant enzymes compared with the control. Additionally, Na content, H2O2, and O2•− were reduced by all applications. The application of the Kh (0.3 g/L) + SA (0.2 g/L) combination was more effective than using the individual compounds. In conclusion, applications of Kh + SA can mitigate salt stress and improve the seedling growth of common bean.

1. Introduction

Water and soil salinity have been among the main problems in the agricultural sector in recent decades. Most economically essential crops are classified as moderate or severely sensitive to salinity. These crops have been reported to lose about 20–50% of their production due to exposure to salinity stress [1]. More than 33% of agricultural lands are affected by salinity. Current estimates suggest that salinization is increasing by 10% annually due to factors such as irrigation with saline water, climate change, high temperatures, and high soil evaporation, as well as poor agricultural practices [2]. It is estimated that by 2050, about 50% of cultivated lands will be affected by salinity [3].
Crops grown under salinity stress suffer from osmotic stress and a lack of nutrient supply [4]. These factors cause severe damage to plants, such as reductions in seed germination, photosynthesis processes, growth, yield, and fruit quality [5,6,7]. Additionally, several physiological processes in plants, such as respiration, protein synthesis, lipid metabolism, enzyme and hormone activities, and gene expression, are affected by salinity [8,9]. The effect of salinity on plants occurs first during an early stage of growth known as the osmotic phase and then during a late stage of growth known as the ionic phase [10]. Plant response to salinity depends on the salinity level, growth stage, and exposure duration.
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a notable crops belonging to the legume family that is consumed either as fresh pods (also known as green beans, French beans, string beans, or snap beans) or dry seeds. Common beans are considered one of the most nutritious vegetable crops due to the high availability of protein and micronutrients [11]. Globally in 2020, the production of common beans was about 23 million tonnes harvested from about 16 million hectares (FAOSTAT 2020, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/, accessed on 1 September 2022). The top producers of green beans are China, Indonesia, Turkey, India, Thailand, and Egypt.
One of the critical aspects of common bean cultivation is its salinity sensitivity [12]. It is well known that the growth and production of common bean plants are reduced when salinity levels exceed 1 dS m−1 [12]. Several previous studies have reported the adverse effect of salinity on the growth and production of common bean [13], as well as other legumes, such as soybean, mungbean, and fava bean [14,15,16]. Under saline conditions, Na+ and Cl− are accumulated in plant cells, which causes toxicity for plants and reduces the uptake of most elements, such as N, P, K, Ca, and Mg [17]. Some of the strategies to reduce the harmful effects of salinity are the application of fertilizer with organic matter, including compost and biochar [18], foliar application with nutrients [19], the use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria [20], and breeding for resistance cultivars [21]. However, some previous applications have had limited effects. Therefore, more than one application may support mitigation of abiotic stresses crops sensitive to salinity, such as common beans.
Potassium humate (Kh) is a salt derived from humic acid (HA) that is used to improve plant growth and production via soil [22] and foliar applications [23]. The role of HA in stimulating plant growth and increasing yield is attributed to its role in facilitating the transfer of elements from the soil into the plant by increasing the permeability of the cell membrane [24]. Additionally, it has been reported that HA improves plant growth and photosynthesis processes under abiotic stresses and increases antioxidant enzyme activity [25]. Additionally, potassium (K) is classified as a macro element essential for most physiological processes inside plants [26]. K plays a positive role in alleviating stresses such as salinity and drought [27]. Previous studies indicate the role of HA in mitigating salinity stress in crops such as sorghum [28]. A limited number of studies have been conducted on the effect of exogenous Kh application on beans, such as that by Taha and Osman [29], who found that Kh improves bean growth under saline stress.
Salicylic acid (SA) is classified as a natural plant hormone and one of the phenolic compounds that affect several physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, respiration, growth, and production of plants [30]. Most reports indicate the positive role of foliar application with SA in resistance to salinity in different crops, such as strawberries [31], cabbage [32], and cowpea [33]. Previous studies reported the role of exogenous SA application in mitigating biotic and abiotic stresses [34,35].
The combination of SA as a foliar application and Kh as a soil application to mitigate abiotic stresses is rarely reported in the literature. For example, Shalaby et al. [36] found that foliar application of SA + Kh enhanced plant growth, leaf pigments, and the activities of the antioxidant enzymes of marigold plants. Additionally, foliar application of SA + Kh enhanced the growth, photosynthetic pigments, and K accumulation of maize seedlings compared to control plants [37].
To the best of our knowledge, the combined application of SA + Kh to mitigate salinity stress has not been evaluated to date in common bean plants. Our hypothesis in this study is that using SA + Kh could mitigate the salinity stress of common bean plants better than the individual application of either SA or Kh. To evaluate our hypothesis, SA as foliar application and Kh as soil application were applied to common bean plants, and their effects on the plant growth, nutrient uptake, and changes in non-enzymatic antioxidant and antioxidant enzymes were evaluated. The accumulation of reactive oxygen species and hormone formations was also tested.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

Pot experiments were performed in a modified growth chamber at a temperature of 24–28 °C of temperature, 65% relative humidity, and 3500 lx light intensity. Seeds of common bean (cv. Bronco) were used in this experiment. The seeds were sterilized with sodium hypochlorite (1%) for 2 min to avoid seed contamination before seed furrow. The seeds were washed twice with distilled water, then dried. The experiment consisted of 8 treatments (Figure 1) with 5 replicates as follows:
  • Soil application of K-humate treated with 0 NaCl (Kh + 0 NaCl);
  • Soil application of K-humate treated with 50 mM NaCl (Kh + 50 NaCl);
  • Foliar application of salicylic acid treated with 0 NaCl (SA + 0 NaCl);
  • Foliar application of salicylic acid treated with 50 mM NaCl (SA + 50 NaCl);
  • Soil application of K-humate + foliar application of salicylic acid + 0 NaCl (Kh + SA + 0 NaCl);
  • Soil application of K-humate + foliar application of salicylic acid + 50 mM NaCl (Kh + SA + 50 NaCl);
  • Foliar application of water treated with 50 mM NaCl (Cont. + 50 NaCl);
  • Control (without K-humate, salicylic acid, or NaCl) (Cont.).
The concentration of Kh was 0.3 g/L, and that of SA was 0.2 g/L according to previous work [38]. Potassium humate contains 65% humic acid and 15% potassium.
The seeds were sown in plastic pots (15 × 15 cm) filled with acid-washed sand and arranged in a complete randomized design with 5 replicates. After 7 days of complete germination (14 days from seed planting), the desired salt concentration (200 mL) was added daily. Foliar spraying with SA (about 10 mL) was performed using a handgun sprayer on all shoots until the solution began to drip. The soil application of Kh was performed by adding the desired concentration (200 mL) into the growth media. Half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution was used to irrigate seedlings with saline treatment every two days. The foliar application of SA and soil application of Kh were performed 4 times 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after complete germination individually or together. After 33 days of complete germination, the plants were harvested to determine the physiological and chemical parameters.

2.2. Plant Growth and Leaf Pigments

We used a digital balance to measure the fresh weight of the shoots and the roots. Plants were dried in a forced-air drying oven to measure the dry weight of shoots and roots (75 °C) until a consistent weight. For chlorophyll and carotenoid, the method described by Lichtenthaler and Wellburn [39] was followed. In brief, 1 g of fresh samples was extracted in 10 mL acetone (80%) for 1 h at 5 °C. Then, the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 3000× g. The absorption was measured by a spectrophotometer (model UV-2401 PC, International Equipment Trading LTD. (IET), Milano, Italia) at three wavelengths (470, 647, and 663 nm) against the blank. Chlorophyll content and carotenoids are represented in the results as mg g−1 FW.

2.3. Proline Content

The method of Bates et al. [40] was used to determine proline content. Briefly, leaf samples (0.1 g) were extracted in sulfosalicylic acid (3% 10 mL). Then, filter paper (Whatman one) was used to filter the samples. Subsequently, ninhydrin and glacial acetic acid (100% 2 mL) were mixed with 2 mL of the filtrated solution. The samples were boiled for one hour in a water bath at 100 °C. The samples were kept in ice water for 15 min, 4 mL of toluene was added, and the mixture was added and stirred for 15 to 20 s in a test tube. A spectrophotometer measured the absorbance at 520 nm. A standard curve was used to calculate the proline content, and the results are represented as µg g−1 FW.

2.4. Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and Superoxide Anion (O2•−)

The content of H2O2 in fresh leaves was measured according to the method described by Junglee et al. [41]. In brief, 0.1 g of fresh sample was homogenised with 1 mL of extraction mixture (0.1% TCA, 1 M KI, and 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer) for 10 min in an ice bath. The results are expressed as mmol g−1 FW. To determine O2•−, the method of Yang et al. [42] was followed. In brief, a fresh sample (0.2 g) of bean leaves was mixed with 3 mL of phosphate buffer (50 mM; pH 7.8). Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP 1% w/v) was mixed with the reagent and centrifuged for 20 min under cooling (4 °C) at 10,000 rpm. Finally, the optical density was measured at 530 nm. The results are expressed as mmol g−1 FW.

2.5. Determination of Antioxidant Enzymes

Anitoxidant enzymes in leaf samples were determined using the method proposed by Grace and Logan [43]. Proteins were extracted by homogenising 0.1 g of fresh samples in a buffer of potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), which contains 0.1 mM EDTA, 4% PVP, and 2% glycerol. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 15,000× g under cooling (4 °C) for 40 min. The supernatant was used as a crude extract. The total soluble protein was also determined in the supernatant to calculate the specific activity of different enzymes according to Bradford [44]. Enzyme activities of POX and CAT were measured in the supernatants.
To measure the activity of peroxidase (POX) (EC: 1.11.1.7), the method of Lagrimini [45] was used. In brief, 100 µL of crude extract was mixed with 2.9 mL of the reaction solution containing 100 mM guaiacol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 50 mM phosphate buffer, and 30 mM H2O2. The tetra-guaiacol was measured at 465 nm, and the POX activity result is presented as µmol mg−1 protein min−1. The activity of catalase (CAT) (EC: 1.11.1.6) was measured according to Aebi [46]. The ability of the enzyme extract to decompose H2O2 at room temperature was used to measure CAT activity by observing the drop in absorbance at 240 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of potassium phosphate (100 Mm) buffer (pH 7) and 25 mM H2O2. A volume of 100 µL of crude extract was added to 3 mL to begin the reaction. The results are expressed as µmol mg−1 protein min−1. The method of Dhindsa et al. [47] was used to determine the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. This method depends on the ability of one unit of SOD to inhibit 50% of nitro blue tetrazolium photoreduction at 560 nm. The results are expressed in mg−1 protein min−1.

2.6. Determination of Sodium (Na+) and Potassium (K+) in Leaves

The amounts of sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) in bean leaves were measured using the flame photometric method (Jenway, Leicestershire, UK) as described previously [4]. In brief, the fresh samples were washed with distilled water and kept in a forced-air oven until constant weight at 70 °C. The dried samples were ground to obtain powder. Then, 0.2 g of sample was digested using a mixture of perchloric acids and sulphuric acid. The results are presented as mg g−1 DW.

2.7. Determination of Ascorbic Acid (AA) and Glutathione (GSH)

The previously described by Mukherjee and Choudhuri [48] was followed to determine the ascorbic acid (AA) content in the common bean leaves. Briefly, samples (0.1 g) were extracted in 6% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. Then, 2 mL of dinitrophenyl hydrazine (2%; w/v) was mixed with 4 mL of the extract, and 1 drop of thiourea in 70% (v/v) ethanol was added. The mixtures were then boiled for 15 min in a water bath. After cooling, 5 mL of H2SO4 (80%; v/v) was added, and samples were read at 530 nm. The results are expressed as mg/100 g FW. The method of Griffth [49] was used to determine the concentration of GSH. The concentration of GSH was calculated from a standard curve, and the results are expressed as nmol GSH g−1 FW.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The results were statistically analysed using a one-way analysis of variance under a complete randomized design. The means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test at p ≤ 0.05. SPSS (V.21) computer software was used for statistical analysis. The heatmap figure was created using ClustVis online software. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using Statistica 7 software (TIBCO Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Kh and SA on Growth

As expected, salinity stress (50 mM NaCl) reduced the growth of common bean plants (Figure 2A–D). Under non-saline and saline conditions, all treatments increased the fresh weight of shoots compared to control plants (Figure 2A). The highest values of shoots were recorded under the Kh + SA treatment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the fresh weight of shoots between the Kh + SA treatment under saline conditions and the control plants under non-saline conditions. Similarly, under non-saline conditions, Kh and Kh + SA applications showed higher shoot dry weight than the control plants (Figure 2B). Under the saline condition, both Kh and Kh + SA applications improved the shoots’ dry weight by 16.35 % and 23.59 %, respectively, compared with the control plants.
As shown in Figure 2C, the root fresh weight was increased by Kh and Kh + SA treatments compared with control plants under non-saline conditions. However, under 50 mM NaCl stress, all treatments significantly increased the root fresh weight by 28.10%, 19.73%, and 49.41%, respectively, compared with the control. Furthermore, the Kh + SA treatment under saline conditions resulted in the highest values. As shown in Figure 2D, Kh and Kh + SA applications increased the dry weight of roots compared to the control treatment under non-saline conditions. Moreover, under saline conditions, Kh + SA treatment resulted in the highest values of root dry weight.

3.2. Effect of Kh and SA on Leaf Pigments, O2•−, and H2O2

Salinity stress reduced the content of total chlorophyll and carotenoids in common bean leaves under all treatments (Figure 3A,B). Moreover, the total chlorophyll content was significantly increased by only Kh + SA treatment under non-saline conditions compared to the control treatment. However, under saline stress, SA, Kh, and Kh + SA applications improved total chlorophyll content by 19.28%, 30.79%, and 45.41%, respectively, compared to the control. None of the treatments changed carotenoid content under the non-saline condition (Figure 3B). However, all treatments improved carotenoid content without significant differences compared to the control treatment.
As shown in Figure 3C,D, H2O2 and O2•− levels were increased by salinity stress under all treatments. Under the non-saline condition, neither H2O2 nor O2•− levels were significantly different between any of the treatments. The accumulation of H2O2 in the leaves of common bean plants that were treated with Kh, SA, and Kh + SA was reduced by 20.37, 27.45, and 27.16%, respectively, compared to control treatment under NaCl stress. The same trend of results was recorded for O2•− content.

3.3. Effect of Kh and SA on the Activity of Antiaxidant Enzymes and Proline

As shown in Figure 4A–C, the activity of POX, CAT, and SOD enzymes in leaves was increased under saline stress compared to non-saline conditions for all treatments. Moreover, under non-saline conditions, there was no significant difference in the activity of any enzymes between treatments. However, under saline conditions, the POX activity in plants that were treated with Kh + SA was increased compared to the control. Similarly, SA, Kh, and Kh + SA treatments significantly increased the activities of CAT and SOD enzymes compared to the control under saline conditions.
The proline concentration was increased under 50 mM NaCl stress compared with the non-saline condition in all treatments (Figure 3D). Under the non-saline condition, there was no significant difference in proline content between any of the treatments. However, all applications resulted in higher proline content values than the control treatment under saline conditions.

3.4. Effect of Kh and SA on the GSH, AA, Na, and K

The results presented in Figure 5A,B show that both GSH and AA in common bean seedlings were decreased by salinity treatment compared to the control treatment (non-saline condition). However, the SA + Kh application significantly increased GSH content under saline conditions compared to untreated seedlings. Furthermore, both SA and SA + Kh applications increased AA content in bean seedlings compared to the control under saline stress.
The content of Na in the leaves of the bean seedlings irrigated with 50 mM NaCl was higher than in plants irrigated with regular water (Figure 5C). There was no significant difference in Na content between any of the treatments under non-saline conditions. Additionally, all treatments significantly reduced Na content compared with the control under saline stress. Under non-saline conditions, SA + Kh application resulted in higher K content than the control, whereas SA treatment decreased the K content (Figure 5D). However, SA, Kh, and Kh + SA applications increased the K content compared to the control under saline conditions.

3.5. Principal Component Analysis and Heatmap Clustering

A PCA biplot including PC1 and PC2 is presented in Figure 6A. The biplot visualizes how samples relate to each other, i.e., which samples are similar and which are different, as well as how each variable contributes to each principal component. PCA analysis accounted for 82% of the variance. PC1 and PC2 accounted for 69.27 and 12.95% of the total variability, respectively. Antioxidant enzymes and proline contributed significantly to PC2, and all vegetative growth and non-enzymatic antioxidants (GSH, AA, and carotenoids) showed inclinations toward PC1, including K and total chlorophyll.
The heatmap shows that all growth and biochemical parameters under different treatments can be divided into four clusters (Figure 6B a, b, c, and d). Group a includes all vegetative growth parameters, total chlorophyll, and K. GSH, AA, and carotenoids are in group b, whereas H2O2, O2•−, and Na are in group c. Proline, CAT, POX, and SOD enzymes are categorized in group d. As shown in Figure 6B, group a indicates that vegetative parameters were reduced (dark blue) by salinity stress but enhanced by SA and Kh applications (light blue to red). GSH, AA, and carotenoid values (Figure 6B, group b) were reduced by salinity stress (blue) compared to non-saline conditions (red) and increased by SA and Kh applications under saline conditions. In contrast, H2O2, O2•−, and Na were increased by salinity stress (Figure 6B, group c). The double treatments (SA + Kh) showed the best results in reducing H2O2, O2•−, and Na contents under saline conditions (light blue values). Finally, the activity of antioxidant enzymes and proline increased under salinity stress compared to the non-saline condition (Figure 6B, group d).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Kh and SA on Growth

Salt stress reduces plant growth by affecting physiological processes such as photosynthesis, hormones, and enzyme activities [9]. Our study shows that salinity stress decreased the growth of common bean seedlings (Figure 2A–D). This reduction in growth might be due to several factors, such as ionic toxicity, osmotic pressure, limitation of elements absorption, a reduction in photosynthesis processes, and accumulation of Na in plant tissue [4,50]. In this study, SA, Kh, and Kh + SA applications increased plant growth parameters under normal and saline conditions. Recently, SA has been used in plant cultivation to mitigate the harmful effects of several abiotic stresses, such as salinity. This is due to the role of SA in enhancing the photosynthesis processes and mitigating cell membrane damage caused by salinity stress [51].
The application of SA might enhance the growth of seedlings by weakening the cell membrane. Furthermore, SA enhanced plant growth by maintaining the expected levels of indole acetic and gibberellic acid levels responsible for plant growth [52]. Additionally, previous studies indicated that SA application mitigates salinity and improves growth (plant fresh and dry weight) of some crops, such as kidney beans and cabbage [31,34].
In line with our results, previous works reported the positive role of Kh in enhancing plant growth of beans under normal and salinity stress [29,53,54]. The positive role of Kh in enhancing plant growth might be due to its role in increasing the organic matter of growth media, water availability, conserved mineral nutrients from leaching, and mineral absorption by plant roots [53,54,55]. Additionally, Kh was more effective than SA in improving plant growth (Figure 2). This could be due to the role of potassium in controlling many enzymes in plants [56], as well as the role of humate as a biostimulants [36]. Taken together, our results suggest that SA + Kh application was the most effective treatment. This result is in agreement with that reported by Shalaby et al. [36], who found that the combined application of SA + Kh significantly enhanced the plant growth of marigold plants. Moreover, heatmap analysis (Figure 6B, group a) showed that SA and Kh treatments increased vegetative growth parameters under saline conditions.

4.2. Effect of Kh and SA on Leaf Pigments, O2•−, and H2O2

The decline in photosynthetic pigments is one of the most damaging effects of salt stress. Our results show that salinity stress reduced total chlorophyll and carotenoids (Figure 3A,B). Alzahrani et al. [57] confirmed our findings, reporting that saline conditions prevented the synthesis of chlorophyll and carotenoid in stressed plants. Salinity stress might also reduce chlorophyll fluorescence and cause a severe imbalance in stomatal function [58]. Additionally, salinity retards the absorption of magnesium, which is required for chlorophyll synthesis [59].
The results in this study (Figure 3A) and those of previous studies indicate that SA application enhances the chlorophyll content of kidney bean plants [31], tomatoes [60], cucumbers [61], and mungbean [62]. These results could be due to the role of SA in increasing the relative vitality of photosynthesis and decreasing initial fluorescence [63]. Furthermore, the role of Kh in enhancing chlorophyll and carotenoid contents under saline conditions was previously reported [29,64]. These findings could be due to the role of SA and Kh in enhancing photosynthesis biosynthesis (by protecting chloroplast pigments from salt toxicity through oxidative protection of chloroplasts) and improving the performance of enzymes during the chlorophyll process [51]. Bijanzadeh et al. [37] found that a combination treatment of SA and Kh improved chlorophyll and carotenoid content in corn plants, which supports our hypothesis that the combination of the two compounds is more effective than the individual compounds. Furthermore, heatmap analysis (Figure 6B) showed that SA and Kh treatments under saline conditions increased leaf pigments.
Environmental stresses, especially salinity and drought, encourage the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including O2•− and H2O2, which promote the tolerance of plants to these stresses [62]. Figure 3C,D show a clear trend of increasing ROS under salinity stress compared with the non-saline condition. A similar result was recorded by Nawaz et al. [62], who found that salinity increased ROS levels in mungbean shoots. However, in this study, the application of SA and Kh retarded the production of H2O2 under saline conditions. This result is in agreement with that reported by Nawaz et al. [62], who showed that SA application decreased the H2O2 content in mungbean shoots under saline conditions. SA may have played a vital role in ROS scavenging and reduced H2O2 content, which maintains plant growth under adverse conditions [65]. Moreover, Kh effectively reduced ROS generated by oxidative stresses in maize [66] and strawberries [38]. Additionally, PCA (Figure 6A) and heatmap analysis (Figure 6A, group c) showed that O2•−, H2O2, and Na are closely clustered in the same group.

4.3. Effect of Kh and SA on the Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes and Proline

Under abiotic stresses, several mechanisms of plants mitigate these stresses. One of these mechanisms is enhancement of the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, SOD, and POX, which play a vital role in scavenging ROS [67]. These findings are consistent with our results presented in Figure 4A–C, indicating an increase in the activity of antioxidant enzymes under saline conditions. Similar results were recorded in strawberry plants [33].
The results of this study indicate that the application of SA increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes under saline stress. Treatment with SA might stimulate the activity of antioxidant enzymes, reducing the harmful effects of ROS under saline stress [68]. Previous studies indicated that SA application increases the activity of antioxidant enzymes under biotic stress conditions [36,69,70,71]. We also recorded an increase in the activities of CAT, SOD, and POX as a result of Kh treatment (Figure 4A–C). These results match those observed in an earlier study by Hemida et al. [53], who found that Kh application increased the activities of CAT, SOD, and POX enzymes in common bean plants under salinity conditions. The increased activity of antioxidant enzymes with the increasing AA and GSH (Figure 5A,B) by SA + Kh application could encourage the normal growth of plants under environmental stresses. Potassium also plays a vital role in plant growth and regulates many physiological processes by controlling their enzymes [72], which could explain the effective role of Kh in enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity [36].
It is well known that proline accumulates in plant tissue under unfavourable environmental conditions, especially salinity and drought [73]. Proline protects proteins, membranes, and cellular structures from damage by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) in tissue [74,75,76]. Many previous works recorded an increase in proline content in some crops, such as tomatoes [4], broad bean [9], and green beans [29], under saline conditions. Similarly, our results presented in Figure 3C and Figure 5 show that salinity increased proline content in common bean leaves. The increase in proline content by SA application in mungbean was previously recorded [62]. As a growth regulator, SA could help regulate osmotic pressure, protect cell membranes from damage, and scavenge ROS under stress conditions [62]. Additionally, previous work indicated that Kh application increased proline content in pea leaves under saline stress [55]. In this study, Kh improved the activity of antioxidant enzymes and proline content, which could mitigate salinity [25]. Moreover, PCA (Figure 6A) and heatmap analysis (Figure 6B, group d) showed that the activity of antioxidant enzymes and proline are in the same group that increased by SA and Kh treatments under saline conditions compared to the control plants.

4.4. Effect of Kh and SA on the GSH, AA, Na+, and K+

In this study, GSH and AA were decreased by salinity but increased by Kh and SA application (Figure 5A,B). It has been reported that AA and GSH protect cell membranes from oxidative damage by reacting with O2•− and H2O2 [77,78]. The application of Kh mitigates the adverse effects of salinity by improving the absorption of elements, enhancing plant growth [55], and motivating the plant defence system against stresses [53]. Previous studies indicated that Kh application increased antioxidant activity in pepper plants under saline conditions [79]. The role of SA treatment in salinity resistance was reported in some previous studies [33,34,35]. Increasing GSH and AA contents in plants by SA application could enhance a mechanism to protect plants from the accumulation of ROS under stress conditions [80].
Salinity affects the absorption and accumulation of elements in plant tissue [10]. It is well known that uptakes of nutrients (N, P, K+, Ca, and Mg, as well as microelements) in the rhizosphere area is negatively affected by high levels of Na and Cl [4]. In this study, salinity increased the level of Na+ and decreased the K+ content in common bean leaves (Figure 4C,D). Saidimoradi et al. [38] obtained a similar pattern of results, finding that salinity stress reduced the uptake of K+ by strawberry plants. Maintaining adequate K+ levels in plants could mitigate adverse salinity conditions [11,81,82]. Under the saline condition, our results show that Na+ content in leaves was decreased, whereas Kh and SA treatments and their combination increased K+ content (Figure 4C,D). This result is in line with previous studies by Gunes et al. [83] and Roshdy et al. [33], who found that SA application reduced Na+ levels and increased K levels in maize and strawberry plants, respectively, under saline conditions. Additionally, soil Kh application improved the absorption of K+ and decreased the uptake of Na+ in shoots of strawberry plants Saidimoradi et al. [38]. Kh also contains K+, which is known to be responsible for salinity resistance, owing to its competition with sodium in terms of binding and maintaining plant water status [84]. The adsorption of Na by humic compounds as a result of Kh application helps to reduce the content of Na in common bean shoots and allows more K+ to be absorbed by the roots [85].

4.5. Effect of Combined Application (Kh + SA)

The results of this study show that there are no significant differences between SA + Kh and Kh applications in shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, total chlorophyll, total carotenoids, H2O2, O2•−, POX, GSH, Na+, or K+ under saline conditions. This might be due to the role of K+ and humate in both treatments in improving plant growth. However, with respect to some other parameters (fresh weight, CAT, proline, AA, and SOD) SA + Kh treatment was more effective than the individual applications. Thus, our results suggest that soil application of Kh plus SA foliar application can mitigate salinity stress of bean seedlings. More studies are required to prove the effectiveness of the combined application of SA and Kh in enhancing salinity tolerance in bean plants.

5. Conclusions

Oxidative damage resulting from salinity stress was observed, as evidenced by a reduction in shoot and root growth and pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoids (Figure 7). However, the application of SA, Kh, and SA + Kh enhanced the resistance of common bean to salinity stress by reducing Na, O2•−, and H2O2 contents in shoots and increasing content, the activity of the antioxidant enzymes, AA, GSH, and proline content. The most effective treatment was the combined treatment. Thus, combining SA + Kh can effectively mitigate salinity stress in common bean plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., A.P., K.M.A.R., A.K.d.S.L. and M.M.E.-M.; methodology, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., A.P., K.M.A.R. and M.M.E.-M.; software, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., A.P. and M.M.E.-M.; validation, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., K.M.A.R., A.K.d.S.L. and M.M.E.-M.; formal analysis, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., A.P., K.M.A.R., A.K.d.S.L. and M.M.E.-M.; investigation, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., A.K.d.S.L. and M.M.E.-M.; resources, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O. and M.M.E.-M.; data curation, A.P., H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O. and M.M.E.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.E.-B. and M.M.E.-M.; writing—review and editing, H.S.E.-B., A.P., A.K.d.S.L., K.M.A.R. and M.M.E.-M.; visualization, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O., K.M.A.R. and M.M.E.-M.; supervision, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O. and M.M.E.-M.; project administration, H.S.E.-B. and M.M.E.-M.; funding acquisition, H.S.E.-B., H.H.A.-O. and K.M.A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (grant 2,401).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yamaguchi, T.; Blumwald, E. Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: Challenges and opportunities. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jamil, A.; Riaz, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 435–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdeldym, E.A.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Abdellateaf, H.R.L.; Atia, M.A.M. Genetic characterization, agro-morphological and physiological evaluation of grafted tomato under salinity stress conditions. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Murillo-Amador, B.; Yamada, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Rueda-Puente, E.; Ávila-Serrano, N.; García-Hernández, J.L.; López-Aguilar, R.; Troyo-Diéguez, E.; Nieto-Garibay, A. Influence of calcium silicate on growth, physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in two legume species under salt stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2007, 193, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. F. Abdelgawad, K.; M. El-Mogy, M.; I. A. Mohamed, M.; Garchery, C.; G. Stevens, R. Increasing Ascorbic acid content and salinity tolerance of cherry tomato plants by suppressed expression of the ascorbate oxidase gene. Agronomy 2019, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Mogy, M.M.; Garchery, C.; Stevens, R. Irrigation with salt water affects growth, yield, fruit quality, storability and marker-gene expression in cherry tomato. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2018, 68, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmad, F.; Kamal, A.; Singh, A.; Ashfaque, F.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.H. Salicylic Acid modulates anti-oxidant system, defense metabolites, and expression of salt transporter genes in Pisum sativum under salinity stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1905–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nasrallah, A.K.; Kheder, A.A.; Kord, M.A.; Fouad, A.S.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Atia, M.A.M. Mitigation of salinity stress effects on Broad bean productivity using calcium phosphate nanoparticles application. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nadeem, M.; Li, J.; Yahya, M.; Wang, M.; Ali, A.; Cheng, A.; Wang, X.; Ma, C. Grain legumes and fear of salt stress: Focus on mechanisms and management strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Garcia, C.L.; Dattamudi, S.; Chanda, S.; Jayachandran, K. Effect of salinity stress and microbial inoculations on glomalin production and plant growth parameters of Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Agronomy 2019, 9, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Osman, H.S.; Salim, B.B.M. Influence of exogenous application of some phytoprotectants on growth, yield and pod quality of snap bean under NaCl salinity. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2016, 61, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shu, K.; Qi, Y.; Chen, F.; Meng, Y.; Luo, X.; Shuai, H.; Zhou, W.; Ding, J.; Du, J.; Liu, J.; et al. Salt Stress represses soybean seed germination by negatively regulating ga biosynthesis while positively mediating ABA biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yasar, F.; Ellialtioglu, S.; Yildiz, K. Effect of salt stress on anti-oxidant defense systems, lipid peroxidation, and chlorophyll content in green bean. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 55, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rahman, A.; Alam, M.M.; Mahmud, J.-A.; Suzuki, T.; Fujita, M. Polyamines confer salt tolerance in Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) by reducing sodium uptake, improving nutrient homeostasis, anti-oxidant defense, and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Y.; Schmidhalter, U. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, H.; Lu, H.; Chu, L.; Shao, H.; Shi, W. Biochar applied with appropriate rates can reduce N leaching, keep N retention and not increase NH3 volatilization in a coastal saline soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zuccarini, P. Effects of silicon on photosynthesis, water relations and nutrient uptake of Phaseolus vulgaris under NaCl stress. Biol. Plant. 2008, 52, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumawat, K.C.; Nagpal, S.; Sharma, P. Potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-plant interactions in mitigating salt stress for sustainable agriculture: A review. Pedosphere 2022, 32, 223–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smýkal, P.; Coyne, C.J.; Ambrose, M.J.; Maxted, N.; Schaefer, H.; Blair, M.W.; Berger, J.; Greene, S.L.; Nelson, M.N.; Besharat, N.; et al. Legume crops phylogeny and genetic diversity for science and breeding. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2015, 34, 43–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. dos Santos, B.D.M.S.; Chávez, D.W.H.; de Oliveira, R.; Santos, C.H.B.; Oliveira, E.C.; Rigobelo, E.C. K-humate as an agricultural alternative to increase nodulation of soybeans inoculated with Bradyrhizobium. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 36, 102129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdelrasheed, K.G.; Mazrou, Y.; Omara, A.E.; Osman, H.S.; Nehela, Y.; Hafez, E.M.; Rady, A.M.S.; El-Moneim, D.A.; Alowaiesh, B.F.; Gowayed, S.M. Soil amendment using biochar and application of k-humate enhance the growth, productivity, and nutritional value of Onion (Allium cepa L.) under Deficit Irrigation Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Noroozisharaf, A.; Kaviani, M. Effect of soil application of humic acid on nutrients uptake, essential oil and chemical compositions of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under greenhouse conditions. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants Int. J. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 24, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kaya, C.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Sonmez, O. Exogenous Application of humic acid mitigates salinity stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) plants by improving some key physico-biochemical attributes. Cereal Res. Commun. 2018, 46, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mridha, D.; Paul, I.; De, A.; Ray, I.; Das, A.; Joardar, M.; Chowdhury, N.R.; Bhadoria, P.B.S.; Roychowdhury, T. Rice seed (IR64) priming with potassium humate for improvement of seed germination, seedling growth and anti-oxidant defense system under arsenic stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 219, 112313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumari, S.; Chhillar, H.; Chopra, P.; Khanna, R.R.; Khan, M.I.R. Potassium: A track to develop salinity tolerant plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 1011–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ali, A.Y.A.; Ibrahim, M.E.H.; Zhou, G.; Nimir, N.E.A.; Jiao, X.; Zhu, G.; Elsiddig, A.M.I.; Zhi, W.; Chen, X.; Lu, H. Ameliorative effects of jasmonic acid and humic acid on anti-oxidant enzymes and salt tolerance of Forage Sorghum under salinity conditions. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 3099–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Taha, S.S.; Osman, A.S. Influence of potassium humate on biochemical and agronomic attributes of bean plants grown on saline soil. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koo, Y.M.; Heo, A.Y.; Choi, H.W. Salicylic acid as a safe plant protector and growth regulator. Plant Pathol. J. 2020, 36, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roshdy, A.E.; Alebidi, A.; Almutairi, K.; Al-Obeed, R.; Elsabagh, A. The effect of salicylic acid on the performances of salt stressed strawberry plants, enzymes activity, and salt tolerance index. Agronomy 2021, 11, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Linić, I.; Mlinarić, S.; Brkljačić, L.; Pavlović, I.; Smolko, A.; Salopek-Sondi, B. Ferulic acid and salicylic acid foliar treatments reduce short-term salt stress in Chinese Cabbage by increasing phenolic compounds accumulation and photosynthetic performance. Plants 2021, 10, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. El-Taher, A.M.; Abd El-Raouf, H.S.; Osman, N.A.; Azoz, S.N.; Omar, M.A.; Elkelish, A.; Abd El-Hady, M.A.M. Effect of salt stress and foliar application of salicylic acid on morphological, biochemical, anatomical, and productivity characteristics of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Plants. Plants 2021, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tania, S.S.; Rhaman, M.S.; Rauf, F.; Rahaman, M.M.; Kabir, M.H.; Hoque, M.A.; Murata, Y. Alleviation of Salt-Inhibited germination and seedling growth of kidney bean by seed priming and exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Seeds 2022, 1, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Osei, R.; Yang, C.; Wei, L.; Jin, M.; Boamah, S. Effects of combined application of salicylic acid and proline on the defense response of potato tubers to newly emerging soft rot bacteria (Lelliottia amnigena) Infection. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shalaby, T.A.; El-Newiry, N.A.; El-Tarawy, M.; El-Mahrouk, M.E.; Shala, A.Y.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; Rezk, A.A.; Ramadan, K.M.A.; Shehata, W.F.; El-Ramady, H. Biochemical and physiological response of marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.) to foliar application of salicylic acid and potassium humate in different soil growth media. Gesunde Pflanz. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bijanzadeh, E.; Naderi, R.; Egan, T.P. Exogenous application of humic acid and salicylic acid to alleviate seedling drought stress in two corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 1483–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saidimoradi, D.; Ghaderi, N.; Javadi, T. Salinity stress mitigation by humic acid application in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Junglee, S.; Urban, L.; Sallanon, H.; Lopez-Lauri, F. Optimized assay for hydrogen peroxide determination in plant 580 tissue using potassium iodide. Am. J. Anal. Chem 2014, 5, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, H.; Wu, F.; Cheng, J. Reduced chilling injury in cucumber by nitric oxide and the anti-oxidant response. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1237–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Grace, S.C.; Logan, B.A. Acclimation of Foliar Anti-oxidant systems to growth irradiance in three broad-leaved evergreen species. Plant Physiol. 1996, 112, 1631–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lagrimini, L. Plant peroxidases: Under-and over-expression in transgenic plants and physiological consequences. Plant Peroxidases 1980, 1990, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  46. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; Volume 105, pp. 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dhindsa, R.S.; Plumb-Dhindsa, P.; Thorpe, T.A. Leaf Senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J. Exp. Bot. 1981, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mukherjee, S.P.; Choudhuri, M.A. Implications of water stress-induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 1983, 58, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Griffith, O.W. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Anal. Biochem. 1980, 106, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abbas, G.; Rehman, S.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Ali, H.M.; Farooq, M.A.; Chen, Y. Potassium and Humic Acid synergistically increase salt tolerance and nutrient uptake in contrasting wheat genotypes through ionic homeostasis and activation of anti-oxidant enzymes. Plants 2022, 11, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Q.; Qian, R. Salicylic acid alleviates the adverse effects of salt stress on Dianthus superbus (Caryophyllaceae) by activating photosynthesis, protecting morphological structure, and enhancing the anti-oxidant system. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. El-Mergawi, R.A.; Abd El-Wahed, M.S.A. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid or indole acetic acid on their endogenous levels, germination, and growth in maize. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2020, 44, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hemida, K.A.; Eloufey, A.Z.A.; Seif El-Yazal, M.A.; Rady, M.M. Integrated effect of potassium humate and α-tocopherol applications on soil characteristics and performance of Phaseolus vulgaris plants grown on a saline soil. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 1556–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mahdi, A.H.A.; Badawy, S.A.; Abdel Latef, A.A.; El Hosary, A.A.A.; Abd El Razek, U.A.; Taha, R.S. Integrated Effects of Potassium Humate and planting density on growth, physiological traits and yield of Vicia faba L. Grown in Newly Reclaimed Soil. Agronomy 2021, 11, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Osman, A.S.; Rady, M.M. Ameliorative effects of sulphur and humic acid on the growth, anti-oxidant levels, and yields of pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants grown in reclaimed saline soil. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumar, P.; Kumar, T.; Singh, S.; Tuteja, N.; Prasad, R.; Singh, J. Potassium: A key modulator for cell homeostasis. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 324, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alzahrani, O.; Abouseadaa, H.; Abdelmoneim, T.K.; Alshehri, M.A.; El-Mogy, M.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; Atia, M.A.M. Agronomical, physiological and molecular evaluation reveals superior salt-tolerance in bread wheat through salt-induced priming approach. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2021, 49, 12310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khan, H.A.; Siddique, K.H.; Munir, R.; Colmer, T.D. Salt sensitivity in chickpea: Growth, photosynthesis, seed yield components and tissue ion regulation in contrasting genotypes. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 182, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant Responses to Salt Stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Molina, A.; Bueno, P.; Marín, M.C.; Rodríguez-Rosales, M.P.; Belver, A.; Venema, K.; Donaire, J.P. Involvement of endogenous salicylic acid content, lipoxygenase and anti-oxidant enzyme activities in the response of tomato cell suspension cultures to NaCl. New Phytol. 2002, 156, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shim, I.-S.; Momose, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Kim, D.-W.; Usui, K. Inhibition of catalase activity by oxidative stress and its relationship to salicylic acid accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 39, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nawaz, M.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Khan, A.; Nawaz, F. Salicylic Acid– and Ascorbic Acid–Induced Salt Tolerance in Mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) Accompanied by Oxidative Defense Mechanisms. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 2057–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ghassemi-Golezani, K.; Lotfi, R. The impact of salicylic acid and silicon on chlorophyll a fluorescence in mung bean under salt stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 62, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aminifard, M.H.; Aroiee, H.; Azizi, M.; Nemati, H.; Jaafar, H.Z.E. Effect of Humic Acid on Antioxidant Activities and Fruit Quality of Hot Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2012, 18, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jini, D.; Joseph, B. Physiological Mechanism of Salicylic Acid for Alleviation of Salt Stress in Rice. Rice Sci. 2017, 24, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kaya, C.; Şenbayram, M.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Sulfur-enriched leonardite and humic acid soil amendments enhance tolerance to drought and phosphorus deficiency stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Parihar, P.; Singh, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4056–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hayat, S.; Hasan, S.A.; Fariduddin, Q.; Ahmad, A. Growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in response to salicylic acid under water stress. J. Plant Interact. 2008, 3, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Horváth, E.; Szalai, G.; Janda, T. Induction of Abiotic Stress Tolerance by Salicylic Acid Signaling. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 26, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Harfouche, A.L.; Rugini, E.; Mencarelli, F.; Botondi, R.; Muleo, R. Salicylic acid induces H2O2 production and endochitinase gene expression but not ethylene biosynthesis in Castanea sativa in vitro model system. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Mohamed, H.I.; Aldaej, M.I.; Al-Khayri, J.M.; Rezk, A.A.; Al-Mssallem, M.Q.; Sattar, M.N.; Ramadan, K.M.A. Production and anti-oxidant activity of secondary metabolites in Hassawi rice (Oryza sativa L.) cell suspension under salicylic acid, yeast extract, and pectin elicitation. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guo, K.; Tu, L.; He, Y.; Deng, J.; Wang, M.; Huang, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. Interaction between calcium and potassium modulates elongation rate in cotton fiber cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5161–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaur, G.; Asthir, B. Proline: A key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Biol. Plant. 2015, 59, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Salinas, R.; Sánchez, E.; Ruíz, J.M.; Lao, M.T.; Romero, L. Proline, Betaine, and Choline Responses to Different Phosphorus Levels in Green Bean. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2013, 44, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Shah, S.; Ullah, S.; Sulaiman; Mansour, A.T.; Shalaby, T.A. Impacts of ascorbic acid and alpha-tocopherol on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown in water deficit regimes for sustainable production. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8861. [Google Scholar]
  76. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Sulaiman; Mohamed, M.E.M.; Ullah, S.; Shah, S. Effects of ascorbic acid and/or α-tocopherol on agronomic and physio-biochemical traits of Oat (Avena sativa L.) under drought condition. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mutlu, A.; Tas, T. Foliar application of humic acid at heading improves physiological and agronomic characteristics of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 102320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Das, K.; Roychoudhury, A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of anti-oxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akladious, S.A.; Mohamed, H.I. Ameliorative effects of calcium nitrate and humic acid on the growth, yield component and biochemical attribute of pepper (Capsicum annuum) plants grown under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 236, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khan, N.; Syeed, S.; Masood, A.; Nazar, R.; Iqbal, N. Application of salicylic acid increases contents of nutrients and antioxidative metabolism in mungbean and alleviates adverse effects of salinity stress. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2010, 1, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Naeem, M.; Basit, A.; Ahmad, I.; Mohamed, H.I.; wasila, H. Effect of salicylic acid and salinity stress on the performance of tomato. Gesunde Pflanz. 2020, 72, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Farag, H.A.S.; Ibrahim, M.F.M.; El-Yazied, A.A.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; El-Gawad, H.G.A.; Alqurashi, M.; Shalaby, T.A.; Mansour, A.T.; Alkhateeb, A.A.; Farag, R. Applied selenium as a powerful antioxidant to mitigate the harmful effects of salinity stress in snap bean seedlings. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gunes, A.; Inal, A.; Alpaslan, M.; Eraslan, F.; Bagci, E.G.; Cicek, N. Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Capula-Rodríguez, R.; Valdez-Aguilar, L.A.; Cartmill, D.L.; Cartmill, A.D.; Alia-Tejacal, I. Supplementary Calcium and Potassium Improve the Response of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to Simultaneous Alkalinity, Salinity, and Boron Stress. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016, 47, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lakhdar, A.; Rabhi, M.; Ghnaya, T.; Montemurro, F.; Jedidi, N.; Abdelly, C. Effectiveness of compost use in salt-affected soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Life 13 00448 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of the experimental treatments.
Figure 1. Scheme of the experimental treatments.
Life 13 00448 g001
Life 13 00448 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) shoot fresh weight, (B) shoot dry weight, (C) root fresh weight, and (D) root dry weight of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are reported as means ± SE; n = 5.
Figure 2. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) shoot fresh weight, (B) shoot dry weight, (C) root fresh weight, and (D) root dry weight of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are reported as means ± SE; n = 5.
Life 13 00448 g002
Life 13 00448 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) total chlorophyll, (B) carotenoids, (C) H2O2, and O2•− (D) of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5.
Figure 3. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) total chlorophyll, (B) carotenoids, (C) H2O2, and O2•− (D) of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5.
Life 13 00448 g003
Life 13 00448 g004a 550Life 13 00448 g004b 550
Figure 4. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) POX, (B) CAT, (C) SOD, and (D) proline content of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5.
Figure 4. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) POX, (B) CAT, (C) SOD, and (D) proline content of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5.
Life 13 00448 g004aLife 13 00448 g004b
Life 13 00448 g005a 550Life 13 00448 g005b 550
Figure 5. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) GSH, (B) AA, (C) Na, and (D) K content of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5.
Figure 5. Effect of potassium humate (Kh), salicylic acid (SA), and their combination on (A) GSH, (B) AA, (C) Na, and (D) K content of common bean plants irrigated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5.
Life 13 00448 g005aLife 13 00448 g005b
Life 13 00448 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Loading plot of all recorded parameters included in the PCA. (B) Heatmap analysis for treatments (columns) and tested parameters (rows). The numbers indicate the degree of colour. Blue refers to lower numerical values, and red refers to higher numerical values. The colour scale is located in the top-right corner of the chart.
Figure 6. (A) Loading plot of all recorded parameters included in the PCA. (B) Heatmap analysis for treatments (columns) and tested parameters (rows). The numbers indicate the degree of colour. Blue refers to lower numerical values, and red refers to higher numerical values. The colour scale is located in the top-right corner of the chart.
Life 13 00448 g006
Life 13 00448 g007 550
Figure 7. Simplified chart illustrating the effect of Kh and SA applications on the growth and chemical changes of common bean seedlings grown under salinity stress.
Figure 7. Simplified chart illustrating the effect of Kh and SA applications on the growth and chemical changes of common bean seedlings grown under salinity stress.
Life 13 00448 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Beltagi, H.S.; Al-Otaibi, H.H.; Parmar, A.; Ramadan, K.M.A.; Lobato, A.K.d.S.; El-Mogy, M.M. Application of Potassium Humate and Salicylic Acid to Mitigate Salinity Stress of Common Bean. Life 2023, 13, 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020448

AMA Style

El-Beltagi HS, Al-Otaibi HH, Parmar A, Ramadan KMA, Lobato AKdS, El-Mogy MM. Application of Potassium Humate and Salicylic Acid to Mitigate Salinity Stress of Common Bean. Life. 2023; 13(2):448. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020448

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Beltagi, Hossam S., Hala Hazam Al-Otaibi, Aditya Parmar, Khaled M. A. Ramadan, Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato, and Mohamed M. El-Mogy. 2023. "Application of Potassium Humate and Salicylic Acid to Mitigate Salinity Stress of Common Bean" Life 13, no. 2: 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop