Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effectiveness of Manual Trigger Point Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Trigger Points in the Orofacial Region—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Management—Case Reports and Short Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Efficacy of Manual Therapy Approaches on Pain, Maximum Mouth Opening and Disability in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/life13020335
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complicated Relationships between Anterior and Condylar Guidance and Their Clinical Implications—Comparison by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Electronic Axiography—An Observational Cohort Cross-Sectional Study

by
Łukasz Lassmann
1,*,
Zuzanna Nowak
2,
Jean-Daniel Orthlieb
3 and
Agata Żółtowska
4
1
Dental Sense Medicover, ul. Myśliwska 33a, 80-283 Gdańsk, Poland
2
Department of Temporomandibular Disorders, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Traugutta sq. 2, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
3
Faculty of Odontology, Aix-Marseille University, 58 Boulevard Charles Livon, 13007 Marseille, France
4
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(2), 335; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020335
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 23 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches in Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) and Myofascial Pain)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A complex prosthodontic treatment is believed to be more successful when the condylar path is replicated using the articulator. However, there is an ongoing major disagreement between the researchers as the exact relationship between the posterior and anterior determinants has not been clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the protrusive movement of the mandible does correlate with the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anatomy or with incised features. Subjects (15 males and 15 females) were qualified for this study based on an initial interview including the following criteria: age 21–23 (+/−1), no history of trauma, orthodontic treatment, or temporomandibular disorders (TMD). For each patient, the angle of the condylar path, incisal guidance angle (IGA), interincisal angle, as well as overbite and overjet were measured on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This was followed by the examination with the Modjaw® electronic axiograph recording and calculating the functional sagittal condylar guidance angle (SCGA) for the right and left TMJ during the protrusion. The results show that the mean functional axiographic measurement of SCGA in protrusion significantly correlates with the TMJ anatomy presented on CBCT. Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the values of SCGA in the functional and anatomical measurements in all its variants. It turned out that, statistically, the AB measurement was the most accurate. Finally, results showed that incisal relationships of permanent teeth such as overbite, overjet, incisal guidance angle and interincisal angle do not correlate with TMJ anatomy, and therefore, regarding an analyzed study group, do not affect the TMJ formation in young adults.

1. Introduction

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a part of the stomatognathic system that allows the mandible to move. In adults, those movements are dictated by the shape of the articular tubercle, articular disk, the limitation of the associated ligaments, the neuromuscular system, and the guiding planes of the teeth [1]. A sagittal trajectory of the condyle traversing the articular tubercle with any chosen horizontal plane (e.g., Frankfort) creates the sagittal condylar guidance angle (SCGA). The SCGA can be measured radiographically, using a jaw movement recording device, or with a protrusive interocclusal bite registration method [2,3]. In previous decades, pantomograms have sometimes been recommended for measuring SCG [4]. However, they have many disadvantages, including the orientation of the reference plane and the head, and parallax distortions due to the difficulty of distinguishing the outline of the articular elevation from the lower border of the zygomatic arch [5]. Moreover, panoramic images are often not precise for SCGA measurement due to the overlapping of many structures. In contrast, CBCT scans provide a 3D image for both sides without overlapping, so that articular sublimation and acetabular fossa can be clearly distinguished from adjacent structures, and the CBCT SCGA measurement alone gives much more reliable results. With the advent of CBCT, CT scans were associated with less radiation exposure and greater accuracy, which resulted in their widespread use in dentistry [6].
The registered values of SCGA allow for an accurate articulator setting [3,7,8]. A complex prosthodontic treatment is believed to be more successful when the condylar path is replicated using the articulator, since condylar inclination adjustment affects the cusp height and, to a lesser extent, the occlusal ridge and groove positions [9,10]. Studies have shown that it allows the restoration of the effective shape of the occlusal surface without interferences [2,8]. The steep angles of the articular tubercle allow longer cusps and deeper fossae of the posterior teeth, and shallower concavity of the palatal surfaces of the anterior teeth, thanks to a rapid discussion in the molar area during mandibular movements. A flat articular tubercle requires shorter cusps and shallower grooves of the posterior teeth. The incisal overlap is equally important. The greater the amount of vertical overlap and the smaller the horizontal overlap, the longer the cusps and the deeper the fissures may be [11].
However, there is an ongoing major disagreement between the researchers as the exact relationship between the posterior and anterior determinants has not been clear. Different authors have attempted to confirm or deny the relationship between the posterior determinant—corresponding to the condylar guidance path within the TMJ and the anterior determinant—the incisal, and canine guidance, and their findings vary [12]. The first group claims that there is no correlation between the path of the condyle and the anterior incisal slope [13,14,15]. According to that approach, the anterior guidance must be reconstructed in line with aesthetics, anatomical, and phonetic criteria and provide a posterior disclusion during movements [13]. Dawson emphasizes the importance of adequate concavity or occlusal clearance for anterior guidance to prevent restriction of the mandibular movements and its reduction to simple rotational movement [16].
The opposing group advocates the existence of a connection between the anterior slope and the path of the condyle [12]. As the gnathological approach matured, an anterior guidance steeper than the condylar guidance became a mandatory rule as it provided the elimination of all horizontal forces from the posterior teeth [17]. Brose et al. claim that the incisal guidance angle should always be steeper than the condylar guidance, whereas the height and slope angles of the cusps of the posterior teeth should be harmonious with the condylar and anterior guidance, and where such harmony does not exist, the teeth can be reshaped to a more desirable contour by adjusting or restoring them to eliminate trauma and lessen the harmful effects of parafunction [11]. There are reports suggesting that the steep incisal guidance (IG) may cause the temporomandibular joint to malfunction [18]. It has been hypothesized that IG influences the movements of the condyles, which in turn modifies the growth and morphology of TMJ [19]. However, so far, no one has proven this causation in a meaningful way. Han et al. showed weak but statistically significant correlations between the incisal angle (IGA) and the size of the condyle and fossa centroid [19].
On the other hand, Luca et al. in their study found that there are no differences in the relation between the mandibular fossa features and the inclination of the upper incisors in people with different types of faces, and there is no clinically significant relationship between the shape of the joint and the inclination of the incisors [20]. However, the age of the population in this study ranged from 18 to 40. It is an important factor as TMJ develops between 21 and 23 y.o., and after its peak in growth and development after 17 years of age, TMJ gradually exhibits various modes of adaptation that may be associated with IGA [21]. It is not likely that the morphology and position of incisors have a significant impact on shaping a developing TMJ since incisal guidance seems to be of recent origin. This hypothesis is supported by a study of plague victims in the south of France from 1720 in which a vertical overbite was not present. Some authors argue that incisal guidance did not appear until the Middle Ages, when the use of a fork became common [22,23,24].

1.1. Objectives

In view of the controversy raised by the literature, the aim of this study was to investigate the existence of a statistically significant correlation between the incisal features (IGA, interincisal angle, overbite, and overjet), TMJ morphology, and its function.
Therefore, the following null hypotheses were set:
  • The protrusive movement of the mandible does correlate with the TMJ anatomy.
  • The protrusive movement of the mandible does not correlate with the incisal features.
  • The position and relationship of upper and lower permanent incisors do not have a direct and significant effect on the TMJ morphology in young adults.

1.2. Clinical Implications

Incisal relationships of permanent dentition should not be considered as impacting TMJ morphology and function at an early age. Therefore, the orthodontist should not overestimate the role of overbite and overjet in the aspect of preventing TMJ disorders, and should focus their attention on more important issues, such as the angle of inclination of the occlusal plane.
If the CBCT scans are available, the AB measurement method allows one to accurately determine the condylar guidance angle and aids in the programming of virtual or analog articulators. Otherwise, electronic axiography is a reliable tool for transferring these data to virtual articulators as a part of prosthetic rehabilitation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

This study was approved by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research at Medical University of Gdańsk (number NKBBN/1043/2021-2022) and is retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05637372). Patients received verbal and written information describing the trial and gave their consent to participate in this study.
Subjects were qualified for this study based on an initial interview including the following criteria: age 21–23 (+/−1), no history of trauma, orthodontic treatment, or TMD. Previous studies by Sulün et al. confirmed that the articular eminence reaches its full size between 21 and 30 years of age in healthy patients and decreases after the age of 31 [25]. Similarly, the articular condyle is fully developed between the ages of 21 and 22 [26]. For this reason, we decided to construct the study group including subjects exactly in 21–23 (+/−1) age range, so the correlation between occlusal and joint features is not falsified by any form of adaptation within the TMJ. The interview was followed by an examination performed in accordance with the Polish version of the RDC/TMD criteria, which disqualified one patient diagnosed with myofascial pain [27]. Eventually, 30 patients qualified for this study.

2.2. Study Protocol

For each patient, the angle of the condylar path, incisal guidance angle, the interincisal angle, as well as overbite and overjet were measured on CBCT, followed by the examination with the Modjaw® (MODJAW, Lyon, France) electronic axiograph recording and calculating the functional SCGA for right and left TMJ during the protrusion.
Each CBCT examination was conducted by an experienced radiologist technician with the use of Carestream 9300 device (Carestream Dental, Altanta, GA, USA), set to following parameters: 120 kV, 3.20 mA, 40 s with 1698.19 mGy/cm2 delivered. The patient was in standing position with the mandible in the maximum intercuspation position (MIP). Obtained images were analyzed in CS Imaging 8.0.5 program. To measure the SCGA on the obtained imaging examination, the Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP) was marked as a horizontal reference plane. It was constructed by connecting the left Orbitale and Porion points on both sides (Figure 1A) [28]. Next, in the sagittal view, a layer perpendicular to one running through the innermost and outermost point of the condyle in transverse cross-section was selected for each joint separately (Figure 1B).
The temporomandibular joint space was described by marking the antero-superior space (ASS) and superior space (SS). ASS indicates the thickness of the intermediate band of the disc, while SS indicates the thickness of the posterior band of the disc. Additionally, the vertical height of the fossa (H) was marked (Figure 2A). Then, to achieve the most objective data, three different methods of measuring the SCGA were proposed. First—the AB measurement, which indicates the angle between FHP and the line connecting point A at the deepest point of the articular fossa to point B at the highest point of the articular eminence (Figure 2B). Second—the AT measurement, which indicates the angle between FHP and the line connecting point A at the deepest point of the articular fossa with the tangent point T adjacent to the articular eminence (Figure 2C). Additionally, third—the CD measurement, which indicates angle between Frankfurt plane and a line connecting the highest point C of the condyle to point D, which is below the highest point of the articular tubercle (B), considering the change in the thickness of the disc above the condyle during protrusive movement (Figure 2D). The distance BD reflects intermediate discal space that in vertical dimension is equal to ASS. The numerical data were collected for both joints of each patient and tabulated for further analyses.
Likewise, the data concerning the incisors were collected. The cross-section view of left and right incisors was examined, and, for each patient, the pair of central incisors presenting the higher value of IGA was selected for further measurements of the incisal features [19,29]. We measured the incisal guidance angle—the angle between the line connecting the incisal margin of the maxillary and mandibular incisors with the FHP (Figure 3A); the interincisal angle—between long axis of upper and lower incisors (Figure 3B); overbite—vertical and perpendicular to FHP distance between incisal margins; and overjet—horizontal and parallel to FHP distance between incisal margin of upper incisor and transverse to the FHP projection of the lower incisal edge (Figure 3C).
Afterward, intraoral scans of qualified patients were conducted with the use of the Carestream 3600 scanner. The obtained STL files were transferred to the Modjaw® measuring device to record the mandible movements in real time (Figure 4). The Modjaw® was designed as a substitute for the facebow, axiograph, and mechanical articulator at the same time, with the possibility to transfer obtained data along with the patient’s individual reference plane to CAD/CAM software (Exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) [30]. To obtain an individual value of the SCGA, the following actions were performed: fixing the hinge axis by means of repetitive opening and closing movements with the tongue positioned on the palate, and protrusive movement from MIP to edge-to-edge position. The SCGA during function for each patient was computed in the Modjaw® software between the path of the moving condyle and the individual reference plane set by the line connecting the hinge axis to the line created between the Nasion and Subnasale point.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All calculations have been carried out by means of Microsoft Excel 2019 spreadsheet and STATISTICA (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA; 2020) Data Science Workbench, version 14. In the statistical description of quantitative data, classical measures of location, such as arithmetic means and median, and measures of variation, such as standard deviation and range, were used. The normality of distribution of the variables was tested using Shapiro–Wilk’s test. To assess the linear correlation between two variables, Pearson’s correlation and Spearman’s correlation were used with respect to the type of distribution of the variables tested. To estimate best predictors for a particular dependent variable, multiple regression models were created. In all the calculations, the statistical significance level was set to p < 0.05.

2.4. Limitations

We are aware of some limitations of this work, which is mostly a small study group, and the fact that the Modjaw® axiograph uses an individual reference pane for each patient. However, due to the heterogeneity of the reference plane and its individual character for each patient, it was not possible to directly compare the angles obtained on Modjaw® and on CBCT; the statistical analysis was applied to check the correlations.

3. Results

The measurements of the parameters for all 30 patients (60 TMJ) were collated and subjected to statistical analysis. The aim was to test the correlation between the values of axiographic SCGA during protrusion with SCGA on CBCT (Table 1), the axiographic SCGA during protrusion with the incisal parameters on CBCT (Table 2), and the SCGA with the incisal parameters both measured on CBCT (Table 3), which are presented in the tables below accordingly.
The results show that the mean functional axiographic measurement of SCGA in protrusion significantly correlates with the TMJ anatomy described by the mean vertical height of the fossa (Figure 5) and the angle of the articular tubercle corresponding to SCGA on CBCT (Figure 6). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the values of SCGA in the functional and anatomical measurements in all its variants. It turned out that statistically, the AB measurement was the most accurate; however, the AT measurement and the CD method show the least correlation (Table 1). Therefore, this leads to proving the first null hypothesis.
Subsequent analysis of the mean functional axiographic measurement of SCGA in protrusion collated with the incisal features allowed the confirmation of the second null hypothesis. According to the resolution, the values describing the function of the TMJ did not correlate with any of the incisal parameters: IGA, interincisal angle, overjet, or overbite (Table 2, Figure 7).
Similarly, the third null hypothesis was successfully proved as the incisal parameters did not show a correlation with any of the anatomical CBCT measurements within the TMJ. Regardless of a reference line and slight differences in measurements, no correlation was found between the SCGA on CBCT and front teeth relationships (Table 3, Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Many researchers support the assumption that the shape of the temporomandibular joint is related to its function and that specific functional patterns will provide correlating changes in both dentition and TMJ [31,32,33,34]. The lack of a relationship between the position of the incisors and the morphology of the joint, however, is a much more debatable subject. Our results suggest that while the protrusive movement recorded with the axiograph is correlated with the height and inclination angle of the articular tubercle, the position and mutual relations of the front teeth do not show any correlation to the structure of the temporomandibular joint, regardless of which reference points in the joint are used for measurements.
The evident lack of influence of the anterior guidance and overlapping of the anterior permanent teeth on the formation of the temporomandibular joint early in life is not surprising, considering the age range during which the eminence develops and the hypothesis that the overbite appeared only in the Middle Ages. Articular tuberosity develops in more than 50% of people by the age of five, and almost 90% by the age of eight. The remaining 10% of the eminence angle forms during the teenage years [35]. Therefore, it would be surprising if permanent incisors significantly influenced the structure of the TMJ. An interesting example of a relatively recent change was found in the study of the Maïdu Indians from California. This population showed a straight edge-to-edge bite up to colonization. Later studies showed that the occlusion changed to include the incisal bite, “locking” canine occlusion, and these changes happened probably due to the introduction of a soft diet. The study by Laplanche et al., 2010 also showed more than a doubled incidence of class 3 in 1870 and almost doubled incidence of class 2 in 1970 [22].
Another interesting piece of evidence for modern changes in the relationship of the anterior teeth was provided by the linguist Charles Hockett [33]. He suggested that the use of teeth as tools in hunter–gatherer populations used to wear them down; thus, the production of “f” and “v” consonants between the lower lip and upper teeth was much more difficult. Therefore, there was a hypothesis that these sounds were a recent innovation in human language. Blasi et al. confirmed this hypothesis using paleoanthropology, speech sciences, historical linguistics, and methods from evolutionary biology in their research and provided evidence that labiodental sounds (such as “f” and “v”) were introduced after the Neolithic period [36]. It has also been confirmed that the current front teeth overlap is a relatively new phenomenon caused by recent centuries’ dietary modifications. It can therefore be concluded that the soft diet has made a significant contribution to changing the human bite from edge-to-edge configuration to what we now consider to be the norm, including incisal guidance, which some consider mandatory and necessary [37].
Additional evidence of lack of influence of both the bite type and the diet on the TMJ anatomy emerged from a study carried out on 120 human dry skulls divided into four groups: Forest Period Illinois population (900 to 1500 CE); Archaic Period Kentucky population (500 BC to AD 500), African Americans (20th century), and Caucasian Americans (20th century). Both the height and angle of the articular tubercle did not differ significantly between all studied populations. Thus, results do not support the hypothesis of micro-evolutionary changes in the temporomandibular joint caused by changes in the types of food or the way of food preparation over 2500 years [37].
In describing the complicated relationship between the teeth and the temporomandibular joint, one cannot omit the most controversial aspect, which is the impact of occlusion on TMD. Many recent studies report that occlusion is not a significant factor in disorders of masticatory muscles and the TMJ, as it has been repeated many times over the years. Authors in their current research more often highlight the need to evaluate the patients holistically and focus on various factors beyond the head and neck area [38,39,40]. On the other hand, multiple studies present the correlation between occlusion and the prevalence of TMD. A broad view of the etiology and diagnostics of TMD ensures the further development of more effective and modern treatment methods, which underlines a persistent need to reevaluate our knowledge all over in light of more current research [41,42,43,44,45]. Celebic et al. report that different indicators of condylar and incisal guidance affect the activity of anterior and posterior temporal muscles [30]. Tinastepe et al. found that patients with increased vertical overlapping occlusions and minimal horizontal overlap had more clinical symptoms associated with TMD than patients with physiological mandibular morphology [46]. In a study by Williamson et al., it was reported that masseter and temporalis muscle activity could only be reduced when anterior guidance causes disclusion in the molar region [47]. In the same study, authors stated that muscle activity is not eliminated by the specific relationships of the anterior teeth but by the elimination of contacts on the molars, which is also true for the therapy with the use of anterior jigs [48,49]. Obtaining an immediate disclusion in the posterior region with a protrusive movement may also protect the structure of the posterior teeth by the elimination of the balancing contacts; thus, incisal guidance is still considered to be an important factor in prosthetic rehabilitation and reconstruction. However, it still is a controversial subject whether the existence of balancing contacts can be a cause of TMD. Interestingly, a study by Kahn et al. proves that the balancing occlusal contacts were present much more often in patients without TMD, whereas the patients presenting the symptoms associated with TMD would mostly show an uninterrupted canine guidance [50]. A possible explanation of such an outcome could be the fact that people with TMD tend to clench more, whereas healthy, asymptomatic people grind more often, so they are more likely to show signs of interferences and group contacts during eccentric movements [51]. Moreover, it was proven in a 30 years long cohort study including 1037 patients that abnormal occlusal features such as posterior crossbite and high and low overbite in adolescence are not associated with a higher incidence of TMD later in life [52].
Additionally, according to the results of previous longitudinal studies, high overbite (≥4 mm) at the age of 15 was negatively associated with TMJ abnormalities at the age of 45 [53]. It is also worth answering the question of whether deep bite really protects the TMJ. It turns out that a high overbite is a feature common among people with hypodivergent facial patterns, who generally have larger temporomandibular joint condyles than hyperdivergent individuals [54]. There is a hypothesis that large condyles, due to the larger force distribution area, are less susceptible to mechanical stress than small ones, thus protecting against subsequent disc disturbances [55]. This hypothesis seems to be consistent with the results of a systematic review by Manfredini et al., indicating that facial hyperdivergence is a risk factor for degenerative disorders and temporomandibular disc dysfunction [56]. The following points toward the conclusion that the relationship of the incisors in terms of TMD might be significantly less important than the initial cause of their disrupted relationship, which is the vertical growth pattern. This pathology is also associated with a less favorable composition of the muscle fibers. The fibrous composition of the masseter muscle was studied based on a biopsy performed during the surgical correction of malocclusion. It turned out that the occupancy of type I fibers and areas of hybrid I/II fibers increased in open bites, and vice versa; the occupancy of type II fibers increased in deep bites [57]. This means that the masseter muscles of people presenting with an open bite are not predisposed to long and firm contractions characteristic of clenching activity. Further confirmation that skeletal abnormalities, rather than anterior tooth relationships, may contribute to TMD emerged in a study by Cifter et al. in 2022 [58]. It was found that clockwise jaw rotation, a frequent consequence of disrupted vertical facial growth, causes increased compression within the TMJ. Focusing on the occlusion, it could be once again considered that an impaired anterior teeth relationship is the cause of the muscular disorders, while it appears to be only secondary to skeletal disorders caused by abnormal facial growth.

5. Conclusions

  • The SCGA, during the protrusive movement recorded by the axiograph, is correlated with the features of the articular fossa, such as the height and inclination angle of the articular tubercle, suggesting that the TMJ anatomy dictates its function.
  • The SCGA, during the protrusive movement, is not correlated with the relations between the incisors, pointing towards the conclusion that the TMJ function does not depend on the incisal features (IGA, interincisal angle, overbite, and overjet).
  • Incisal relationships of permanent teeth such as overbite, overjet, IGA, and interincisal angle do not correlate with TMJ anatomy; therefore, they do not affect TMJ formation in young adults in regard to analyzed study group.
  • The AB line is the most reliable reference for measuring the SCGA on CBCT.
  • While processed foods contributed significantly to the change in the bite, neither a soft diet nor a change in the bite modified the structure of the temporomandibular joint, either now or in antiquity.

Author Contributions

Ł.L.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, resources, data curation, and writing—original draft; Z.N.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, and writing—original draft; J.-D.O.: methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision; A.Ż. methodology, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research at Medical University of Gdańsk (number NKBBN/1043/2021-2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationMeaning
TMJTemporomandibular joint
TMDTemporomandibular disorders
IGAIncisal guidance angle
CBCTCone beam computed tomography
SCGASagittal condylar guidance angle
SCGSagittal condylar guidance
IGIncisal guidance
MIPMaximum intercuspation position
FHPFrankfort horizontal plane
ASSAntero-superior space
SSSuperior space

References

  1. Kubein-Meesenburg, D.; Fanghänel, J.; Ihlow, D.; Lotzmann, U.; Hahn, W.; Thieme, K.M.; Proff, P.; Gedrange, T.; Nägerl, H. Functional state of the mandible and rolling–gliding characteristics in the TMJ. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz. 2007, 189, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gilboa, I.; Cardash, H.S.; Kaffe, I.; Gross, M.D. Condylar guidance: Correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008, 99, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shreshta, P.; Jain, V.; Bhalla, A.; Pruthi, G. A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2012, 4, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Tannamala, P.K.; Pulagam, M.; Pottem, S.R.; Swapna, B. Condylar Guidance: Correlation between Protrusive Interocclusal Record and Panoramic Radiographic Image: A Pilot Study. J. Prosthodont. 2012, 21, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Muddugangadhar, B.C.; Mawani, D.; Das, A.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Comparative evaluation of condylar inclination in dentulous subjects as determined by two radiographic methods: Orthopantomograph and cone-beam computed tomography—An in vivo study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2019, 19, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seth, V.; Kamath, P.; Vaidya, N. Cone beam computed tomography: Third eye in diagnosis and treatment planning. Int. J. Orthod. 2012, 23, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Utz, K.-H.; Muller, F.; Luckerath, W.; Fuss, E.; Koeck, B. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position. J. Oral Rehabil. 2002, 29, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shah, N.; Hegde, C.; Prasad, K.D. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2012, 3, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Price, R.B.; Kolling, J.N.; Clayton, J.A. Effects of changes in articulator settings on generated occlusal tracings. Part I: Condylar inclination and progressive side shift settings. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1991, 65, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lundeen, H.C.; Shryock, E.F.; Gibbs, C.H. An evaluation of mandibular border movements: Their character and significance. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1978, 40, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brose, M.O.; Tanquist, R.A. The influence of anterior coupling on mandibular movement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1987, 57, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zoghby, A.E.; Ré, J.-P.; Perez, C. Functional harmony between the sagittal condylar path inclination and the anterior guidance inclination. Int. J. Stomatol. Occlusion Med. 2009, 2, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Broderson, S.P. Anterior guidance—The key to successful occlusal treatment. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1978, 39, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pelletier, L.B.; Campbell, S.D. Evaluation of the relationship between anterior and posterior functionally disclusive angles. Part I: Literature review, instrumentation, and reproducibility. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1990, 63, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pelletier, L.B.; Campbell, S.D. Evaluation of the relationship between anterior and posterior functionally disclusive angles. Part II: Study of a population. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1990, 63, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. E Dawson, P. Determining the determinants of occlusion. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 1983, 3, 8–21. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kepron, D. Experiences with Modern Occlusal Concepts. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1971, 15, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thompson, J.R. Abnormal function of the temporomandibular joints and related musculature. Orthodontic implications. Part II. Angle Orthod. 1986, 56, 181–195. [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, S.; Shin, S.M.; Choi, Y.-S.; Kim, S.Y.; Ko, C.-C.; Kim, Y.-I. Morphometric analysis for evaluating the relation between incisal guidance angle, occlusal plane angle, and functional temporomandibular joint shape variation. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2018, 76, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luca, L.; Manfredini, D.; Arveda, N.; Rossi, L.; Siciliani, G. A cone-beam computerized tomography assessment of the relationship between upper incisors inclination and articular eminence features in orthodontically untreated patients with different facial type. J. World Fed. Orthod. 2016, 5, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Wu, Y.; Dai, H.; Zhou, J. The relation between incisal guidance angle and the growth and development of tem-poromandibular joint: A multi-cross-sectional retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Laplanche, O.; Orthlieb, J.D.; Laurent, M.; Vyslozil, O.; Dutour, O. Evolution of the incisal relationship in a Central European population (1870/1970). Int. J. Stomatol. Occlusion Med. 2010, 3, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kaifu, Y.; Kasai, K.; Townsend, G.C.; Richards, L.C. Tooth wear and the design of the human dentition: A perspective from evolutionary medicine. Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 2003, 122, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brace, C.L. Egg on the Face, f in the Mouth, and the Overbite. Am. Anthropol. 1986, 88, 695–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sülün, T.; Cemgil, T.; Duc, J.-M.P.; Rammelsberg, P.; Jäger, L.; Gernet, W. Morphology of the mandibular fossa and inclination of the articular eminence in patients with internal derangement and in symptom-free volunteers. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2001, 92, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lei, J.; Liu, M.-Q.; Yap, A.U.J.; Fu, K.-Y. Condylar subchondral formation of cortical bone in adolescents and young adults. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2013, 51, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Osiewicz, M.A.; Lobbezoo, F.; Loster, B.W.; Wilkosz, M.; Naeije, M.; Ohrbach, R. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD)—The Polish version of a dual-axis system for the diagnosis of TMD. RDC/TMD Form. J. Stomatol. 2013, 66, 576–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chae, J.-M.; Park, J.H.; Tai, K.; Mizutani, K.; Uzuka, S.; Miyashita, W.; Seo, H.Y. Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2020, 90, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Celebic, A.; Alajbeg, Z.I.; Kraljevic-Simunkovic, S.; Valentic-Peruzovic, M. Influence of different condylar and incisal guidance ratios to the activity of anterior and posterior temporal muscle. Arch. Oral Biol. 2007, 52, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bapelle, M.; Dubromez, J.; Savoldelli, C.; Tillier, Y.; Ehrmann, E. Modjaw® device: Analysis of mandibular kinematics recorded for a group of asymptomatic subjects. Cranio® 2021, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mongini, F. Remodelling of the mandibular condyle in the adult and its relationship to the condition of the dental arches. Cells Tissues Organs 1972, 82, 437–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mongini, F. Dental abrasion as a factor in remodeling of the mandibular condyle. Cells Tissues Organs 1975, 92, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Katsavrias, E.G.; Halazonetis, D. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: A morphometric tomographic study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2005, 128, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tanne, K.; Tanaka, E.; Sakuda, M. Stress distributions in the TMJ during clenching in patients with vertical discrepancies of the craniofacial complex. J. Orofac. Pain 1995, 9, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Nickel, J.C.; McLachlan, K.R.; Smith, D.M. Eminence Development of the Postnatal Human Temporomandibular Joint. J. Dent. Res. 1988, 67, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Blasi, D.E.; Moran, S.; Moisik, S.R.; Widmer, P.; Dediu, D.; Bickel, B. Human sound systems are shaped by post-Neolithic changes in bite configuration. Science 2019, 363, 6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kranjčić, J.; Hunt, D.; Peršić Kiršić, S.; Kovačić, I.; Vukšić, J.; Vojvodić, D. Articular Eminence Morphology of American Historic and Contemporary Populations. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2021, 55, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hirsch, C.; John, M.T.; Drangsholt, M.T.; A Mancl, L. Relationship between overbite/overjet and clicking or crepitus of the temporomandibular joint. J. Orofac. Pain 2005, 19, 218–225. [Google Scholar]
  39. Manfredini, D.; Lombardo, L.; Siciliani, G. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion. A systematic review of association studies: End of an era? J. Oral Rehabil. 2017, 44, 908–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lassmann, Ł.; Pollis, M.; Żółtowska, A.; Manfredini, D. Gut Bless Your Pain—Roles of the Gut Microbiota, Sleep, and Melatonin in Chronic Orofacial Pain and Depression. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nowak, Z.; Chęciński, M.; Nitecka-Buchta, A.; Bulanda, S.; Ilczuk-Rypuła, D.; Postek-Stefańska, L.; Baron, S. Intramuscular Injections and Dry Needling within Masticatory Muscles in Management of Myofascial Pain. Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chęciński, M.; Chęcińska, K.; Turosz, N.; Kamińska, M.; Nowak, Z.; Sikora, M.; Chlubek, D. Autologous Stem Cells Transplants in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joints Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. Cells 2022, 11, 2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Turosz, N.; Chęcińska, K.; Chęciński, M.; Kamińska, M.; Nowak, Z.; Sikora, M.; Chlubek, D. A Scoping Review of the Use of Pioglitazone in the Treatment of Temporo-Mandibular Joint Arthritis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Minervini, G.D.; Del Mondo, D.D.; Russo, D.D.; Cervino, G.D.; D’Amico, C.D.; Fiorillo, L.D. Stem Cells in Temporomandibular Joint Engineering: State of Art and Future Persectives. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2022, 33, 2181–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ferrillo, M.; Nucci, L.; Giudice, A.; Calafiore, D.; Marotta, N.; Minervini, G.; D’Apuzzo, F.; Ammendolia, A.; Perillo, L.; de Sire, A. Efficacy of conservative approaches on pain relief in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review with network meta-analysis. Cranio® 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tinastepe, N.; Oral, K. Investigation of the Relationship between Increased Vertical Overlap with Minimum Horizontal Overlap and the Signs of Temporomandibular Disorders. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 24, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williamson, E.; Lundquist, D. Anterior guidance: Its effect on electromyographic activity of the temporal and masseter muscles. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1983, 49, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lukic, N.; Saxer, T.; Hou, M.; Wojczyńska, A.Z.; Gallo, L.M.; Colombo, V. Short-term effects of NTI-tss and Michigan splint on nocturnal jaw muscle activity: A pilot study. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2021, 7, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. MacDonald, J.W.C.; Hannam, A.G. Relationship between occlusal contacts and jaw-closing muscle activity during tooth clenching: Part I. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1984, 52, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kahn, J.; Tallents, R.H.; Katzberg, R.W.; Ross, M.E.; Murphy, W.C. Prevalence of dental occlusal variables and intraarticular temporomandibular disorders: Molar relationship, lateral guidance, and nonworking side contacts. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999, 82, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rompré, P.; Daigle-Landry, D.; Guitard, F.; Montplaisir, J.; Lavigne, G. Identification of a Sleep Bruxism Subgroup with a Higher Risk of Pain. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Olliver, S.; Broadbent, J.; Thomson, W.; Farella, M. Occlusal Features and TMJ Clicking: A 30-Year Evaluation from a Cohort Study. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 1245–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mohlin, B.O.; Derweduwen, K.; Pilley, R.; Kingdon, A.; Shaw, W.C.; Kenealy, P. Malocclusion and temporomandibular disorder: A comparison of adolescents with moderate to severe dysfunction with those without signs and symptoms of temporoman-dibular disorder and their further development to 30 years of age. Angle Orthod. 2004, 74, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Ma, Q.; Bimal, P.; Mei, L.; Olliver, S.; Farella, M.; Li, H. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2018, 149, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nickel, J.; Iwasaki, L.; Gonzalez, Y.; Gallo, L.; Yao, H. Mechanobehavior and Ontogenesis of the Temporomandibular Joint. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Manfredini, D.; Segù, M.; Arveda, N.; Lombardo, L.; Siciliani, G.; Rossi, A.; Guarda-Nardini, L. Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients With Different Facial Morphology. A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 74, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rowlerson, A.; Raoul, G.; Daniel, Y.; Close, J.; Maurage, C.-A.; Ferri, J.; Sciote, J.J. Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2005, 127, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Cifter, E.D. Effects of Occlusal Plane Inclination on the Temporomandibular Joint Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2022, 2022, 2171049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Life 13 00335 g001 550
Figure 1. (A,B) Establishing a Frankfort reference plane and a proper CBCT layer to obtain reproducible measurements for all the patients according to anatomical landmarks (FHP—Frankfort horizontal plane).
Figure 1. (A,B) Establishing a Frankfort reference plane and a proper CBCT layer to obtain reproducible measurements for all the patients according to anatomical landmarks (FHP—Frankfort horizontal plane).
Life 13 00335 g001
Life 13 00335 g002a 550Life 13 00335 g002b 550Life 13 00335 g002c 550
Figure 2. (A–D) The sagittal view of the TMJ with marked landmarks and illustration of three different methods of measuring the SCGA (ASS—antero-superior space; SS—superior space; H—vertical height of the fossa; FHP—Frankfort horizontal plane; A—deepest point of the articular fossa; B—highest point of the articular eminence; T—tangent point adjacent to the articular eminence; C—highest point of the condyle; D—point below the highest point of the articular tubercle).
Figure 2. (A–D) The sagittal view of the TMJ with marked landmarks and illustration of three different methods of measuring the SCGA (ASS—antero-superior space; SS—superior space; H—vertical height of the fossa; FHP—Frankfort horizontal plane; A—deepest point of the articular fossa; B—highest point of the articular eminence; T—tangent point adjacent to the articular eminence; C—highest point of the condyle; D—point below the highest point of the articular tubercle).
Life 13 00335 g002aLife 13 00335 g002bLife 13 00335 g002c
Life 13 00335 g003a 550Life 13 00335 g003b 550
Figure 3. (A–C) Illustration of measurements concerning the anterior determinant—the incisors: A—incisal guidance angle (IGA), B—interincisal angle, C—overbite and overjet (FHP—Frankfort horizontal plane).
Figure 3. (A–C) Illustration of measurements concerning the anterior determinant—the incisors: A—incisal guidance angle (IGA), B—interincisal angle, C—overbite and overjet (FHP—Frankfort horizontal plane).
Life 13 00335 g003aLife 13 00335 g003b
Life 13 00335 g004 550
Figure 4. An example of SCGA measured by Modjaw axiography.
Figure 4. An example of SCGA measured by Modjaw axiography.
Life 13 00335 g004
Life 13 00335 g005 550
Figure 5. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and mean vertical height of the TMJ fossa.
Figure 5. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and mean vertical height of the TMJ fossa.
Life 13 00335 g005
Life 13 00335 g006 550
Figure 6. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and mean SCGA in AB measurement.
Figure 6. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and mean SCGA in AB measurement.
Life 13 00335 g006
Life 13 00335 g007 550
Figure 7. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and the incisal guidance angle.
Figure 7. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and the incisal guidance angle.
Life 13 00335 g007
Life 13 00335 g008 550
Figure 8. The correlation between the incisal guidance angle and mean SCGA in AB measurement.
Figure 8. The correlation between the incisal guidance angle and mean SCGA in AB measurement.
Life 13 00335 g008
Table
Table 1. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and mean SCGA in CBCT measurements.
Table 1. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and mean SCGA in CBCT measurements.
VariablesnMeanSDr (X, Y)r2p
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.62990.4962530.2462670.005285
Mean vertical height of the TMJ fossa8.24670.8467
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.62990.5518150.3045000.001571
Mean SCGA in AB measurement41.11676.2694
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.62990.5323730.2834210.002459
Mean SCGA in AT measurement52.41677.9525
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.62990.4498540.2023680.012623
Mean SCGA in CD measurement36.48335.8509
Table
Table 2. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and the incisal parameters measured on CBCT.
Table 2. Correlation between mean SCGA during protrusion and the incisal parameters measured on CBCT.
VariablesnMeanSDr (X, Y)r2p
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.6299−0.1736060.0301390.358898
Overbite3.54001.2544
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.62990.0221520.0004910.907500
Overjet2.40670.7701
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.6299−0.1833190.0336060.332212
Interincisal angle134.600011.7403
Mean SCGA during protrusion3056.60006.6299−0.1733430.0300480.359636
Incisal guidance angle53.133312.1789
Table
Table 3. The correlation between the incisal guidance angle and mean SCGA in AB measurements.
Table 3. The correlation between the incisal guidance angle and mean SCGA in AB measurements.
VariablesnMeanSDr (X, Y)r2p
Incisal guidance angle3053.1333312.17893−0.0699850.0048980.713254
Mean SCGA in AB measurement41.116676.26936
Incisal guidance angle3053.1333312.17893−0.0628990.0039560.741250
Mean SCGA in AT measurement52.416677.95254
Incisal guidance angle3053.1333312.17893−0.1299000.0168740.493869
Mean SCGA in CD measurement36.483335.85085
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lassmann, Ł.; Nowak, Z.; Orthlieb, J.-D.; Żółtowska, A. Complicated Relationships between Anterior and Condylar Guidance and Their Clinical Implications—Comparison by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Electronic Axiography—An Observational Cohort Cross-Sectional Study. Life 2023, 13, 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020335

AMA Style

Lassmann Ł, Nowak Z, Orthlieb J-D, Żółtowska A. Complicated Relationships between Anterior and Condylar Guidance and Their Clinical Implications—Comparison by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Electronic Axiography—An Observational Cohort Cross-Sectional Study. Life. 2023; 13(2):335. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lassmann, Łukasz, Zuzanna Nowak, Jean-Daniel Orthlieb, and Agata Żółtowska. 2023. "Complicated Relationships between Anterior and Condylar Guidance and Their Clinical Implications—Comparison by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Electronic Axiography—An Observational Cohort Cross-Sectional Study" Life 13, no. 2: 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020335

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop