Next Article in Journal
Cytogenetic Effects in Patients after Computed Tomography Examination
Previous Article in Journal
Overexpression of Nitrate Transporter 1/Peptide Gene OsNPF7.6 Increases Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/life12121982
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Origanum majorana Essential Oil—A Review of Its Chemical Profile and Pesticide Activity

by
Eleni Kakouri
1,
Dimitra Daferera
1,
Charalabos Kanakis
1,
Panagiota-Kyriaki Revelou
1,
Eleftheria H. Kaparakou
1,
Sofia Dervisoglou
2,
Dionysios Perdikis
2 and
Petros A. Tarantilis
1,*
1
Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Food Science & Human Nutrition, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
2
Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(12), 1982; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121982
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 24 November 2022 / Published: 26 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Origanum majorana is a medicinal and aromatic plant that belongs to the Lamiaceae family. It is cultivated in several parts of the world and, due to its splendid aroma and taste, is widely used for culinary purposes and in perfumes. The essential oil of the plant, to which is attributed its aroma, contains many secondary metabolites with valuable biological activity. One of them is the pesticide activity, which has attracted much interest. Given the necessity of replacing synthetic pesticides, essential oils are studied in an attempt to find naturally derived products. Thus, the aim of this review paper is to discuss the chemical profile of O. majorana essential oil and to present data regarding its insecticidal, repellent and fumigant activity. Data were collected from 1992 to 2022. Databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Scopus, were used for the research, and keywords, including O. majorana, sweet marjoram, essential oil, volatiles, pesticide, insecticide and repellent activity, were used. The results of this review paper indicate that O. majorana essential oil can be an alternative agent to manage pests. However, still, much research should be conducted to evaluate its toxicity against beneficial insects and to ensure its safety for human health.

1. Introduction

Aromatic plants are plants that produce and exude from their different plant organs (leaves, flowers, etc.) aromatic substances, which are used for cosmetic and culinary purposes. On the other hand, according to WHO, medicinal plants are defined as those plants (wild or cultivated) that contain a mixture of active compounds, able to prevent, relieve or cure diseases or serve as lead molecules for the discovery of new drug formulations. These compounds are synthesized through common biochemical pathways shared by primary and secondary metabolism and are commonly known as secondary metabolites. Plants provide a plethora of secondary metabolites that exert significant biological activity.
Lamiaceae is a family well studied for the presence of secondary metabolites, which includes volatile and nonvolatile compounds that are present as complex mixtures. These complex mixtures provide significant biological activity, making these plants useful in the food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries [1,2].
O. majorana L. belongs to the large family of Lamiaceae plants, which consists of 230 genera and almost 7000 species [3]. It is a perennial aromatic, annual herb. Its synonym and accepted botanical name is Majorana hortensis, while the plant is commonly known as sweet marjoram. The plant is native to Greece, Cyprus and Turkey; however, it has also been cultivated in Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria and elsewhere [4,5].
O. majorana is among the well-studied species of the Lamiaceae family. Its rich chemical profile, either referring to the essential oil fraction or the extracts of the plant, has classified O. majorana as a plant with valuable pharmacological activities [5,6,7,8,9,10]. In particular, the biological activity of the essential oil derived from the aerial part of the plant has been examined in various studies. Many properties have been attributed to this fraction of secondary metabolites, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antiacetylcholinesterase, anticancer, antidepressant and analgesic [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Apart from the above-mentioned biological activities, the repellent and insecticidal activity of the essential oil of the plant is of maximum importance [18,19,20]. Nowadays, in order to ensure food availability, crops are treated with synthetic pesticides, for which is intensively discussed their negative impact on human health and the environment as well [21]. Biological replacements for synthetic pesticides currently in use could be essential oils [22]. Thus, a considerable number of studies examine the biological activity of essential oils as candidate pesticides against many insect species [23,24,25]. These naturally derived products aim to protect crops in an eco-friendly manner and at the same time not to adversely affect human health. In particular, regarding the essential oil of O. majorana, its insecticidal, larvicidal, repellent and fumigant activities have been evaluated [20,24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Given the potential of the essential oil of the plant in insect pest control as revealed by the above-mentioned studies, this review aims (a) to gather information regarding the chemical profile of O. majorana essential oil, as has been described by various researchers from different countries; (b) to discuss its pesticide activity in an attempt to evaluate its possible use as a naturally derived insecticide, repellent or fumigant agent. Databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Scopus, were used for the research, and keywords, including O. majorana, sweet marjoram, essential oil, volatiles, pesticide, insecticide and repellent activity, were used.

2. Chemical Profile of O. majorana Essential Oil

Essential oils are complex mixtures, consisting of volatile, usually aromatic, colorless compounds, poorly soluble in water but highly soluble in many organic solvents such as acetone, ethanol and diethyl ether. They are products of the secretory system of the plants, obtained via different procedures, which depend on the plant part used. The most common isolation methods are hydrodistillation and steam distillation, applied when the essential oil is obtained from the aerial parts of the plant.
Volatiles are accumulated at the glandular trichomes of the reproductive and vegetative organs of the plants that belong to the Lamiaceae family. In particular, they are more abundant in reproductive organs and young leaves [33]. Thus, in general, the most popular parts of the plants used are stems, flowers and leaves, from which essential oil is extracted mainly by steam distillation.
Typical constituents of the essential oils are terpenoids and more precisely monoterpenes, which are flavor compounds and sesquiterpenes, oxygenated or not. Other constituents include derivates of monoterpenes, which means compounds bearing different functional groups such as esters, acetates and alcohols [34]. Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes are indicated by the molecular formula (C5H8)n, in which n = 2 in the monoterpenes case since they consist of two isoprene units. On the other hand, sesquiterpenes consist of three isoprene units; thus, n equals 3.
For O. majorana, characteristic volatile compounds presented in great quantities are monoterpenes hydrocarbons and oxygenated monoterpenes. Other constituents, less in quantity, are sesquiterpenes, oxygenated or not (Table 1). As discussed below, the oxygenated monoterpenes prevail in most cases in the O. majorana essential oil derived from different geographical regions, with terpinen-4-ol being the most abundant compound [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
In most studies, compounds detected in abundance were terpinen-4-ol, cis-sabinene hydrate and γ-terpinene, while in some cases, the essential oil is rich in carvacrol and thymol, with the concentration of terpinen-4-ol being half of carvacrol or even absent [20,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. Thus, researchers have classified O. majorana into two main chemotypes, based on qualitative criteria. The first one is the terpinen-4-ol/cis-sabinene hydrate chemotype, and the second belongs to the carvacrol/thymol type [56,57,58]. However, according to literature data gathered in this review paper, this is not always the case, as minor exceptions exist. For example, Chaves et al. (2020) [59] studied a sample of O. majorana originating from Brazil, which was found rich in pulegone (57.05%). Interestingly, no terpinen-4-ol or cis-sabinene hydrate or carvacrol were detected [59]. Furthermore, of the four studies that were found to analyze O. majorana from Morocco, one of them classified the studied sample as terpinen-4-ol chemotype (however without the second major in quantity compound being cis-sabinene hydrate) [60]; the other study identified the compound found in abundance as 4-terpinene [27], and in the rest of the studies, linalool (32.68%), sabinene hydrate (14.08%) and trans-sabinene hydrate (16.0%) were the most characteristic compounds [61,62,63]. However, remarkably, in the first two studies is the presence of terpinen-4-ol (22.30% and 13.07%, respectively).
Other studies that classified O. majorana to a different chemotype are those of Yang et al. (2009), Waller et al. (2016), Baj et al. (2018), Barazandeh et al. (2001) and Dantas et al. (2016) [64,65,66,67,68]. The first two studies [64,65] analyzed samples from India and Egypt, respectively, and found the major constituent being 1.8 cineole (50.96% and 20.9%, respectively). On the other hand, samples from Ukraine and Iran were rich in linalyl acetate (16.0% and 26.1%) [66,67]. Dantas et al. (2016) [68] studied a sample from Egypt. However, a different chemotype was observed, with γ-terpinene being the compound in abundance followed by α-terpinene.
Origanum majorana grown in Greece is classified into three chemotypes. Komaitis et al. (1992) [69] determined a terpinen-4-ol chemotype. This cyclic monoterpene constitutes 37.10% of the total content of essential oil, with p-cymene and α-terpineol being constituents that consist of 50% of the essential oil composition. Daferera et al. (2000) [57] also described an intermediate chemotype of thymol (14.0%) as the main compound. Carvacrol concentration reached 0.2%, while the other compounds found at higher concentrations were 3-carene (10.4%), 2-carene (7.8%), terpinen-4-ol (7.8%) and sabinene hydrate (6.0%). Finally, Giatropoulos et al. (2018) [19] identified a clear carvacrol chemotype, in which the concentration of carvacrol reached 74.8%.
In Table 1 is given summarized information about the collected literature data regarding the volatile profile of O. majorana. The most popular parts of the plant used are stems, flowers and leaves [33], from which essential oil is extracted mainly by steam distillation, a method adopted by the majority of researchers, as concluded from Table 1. Considerable variability is observed regarding the chemical composition of the plant, as well as the percentage yield of its essential oil. Terpinen-4-ol, cis/trans-sabinene hydrate, γ-terpinene, cis-β-terpineol, carvacrol and thymol are the compounds mentioned in abundance in the studied samples. Regarding the essential oil yield from the aerial parts of the plant, the % yield ranges from 0.4 to 1.85 mL/100 g of dry material, while when only leaves were used, the extent of the % yield ranges from 0.09 to 2.5 mL/100 g of dry material.
This chemical diversity of essential oil isolated from O. majorana samples is a product of different parameters such as the growth stage of the plant, climate variability, irrigated or arid crops, geographical area, soil salinity, storage conditions and method of distillation [70,71]. All these variables influence the production of secondary metabolites, thus affecting both the qualitative and quantitative composition of an essential oil. In particular, limited water availability is a factor that decreases crop yield and essential oil yield, or is even responsible for altering an essential oil composition.
A study conducted by Farsi et al. (2019) [72] examined the effect of partial irrigation on O. majorana crops. The authors evaluated three cases: sufficient irrigation of the crop, mild limited irrigation and moderate limited irrigation. Their results showed that inadequate water supply reduced both plant biomass and essential oil yield with respect to their control, fully irrigated crop; however, it did not affect the percentage of the compounds present in the essential oil [72]. Moreover, regarding the carvacrol chemotype, the high percentage of carvacrol can be attributed to the relative humidity at which the plant grows, wild or cultivated, or even the handling (dried or not) of the sample prior to analysis. The effect of humidity on carvacrol content was analyzed in the study of Bağci et al. (2017) [73]. The authors reported that the amount of this phenol-type compound on dried plant material was higher than that of fresh samples. In addition, the increase in carvacrol concentration was higher in the plants collected from the wild. A high concentration of carvacrol was also observed in cases of environmental aridity and increased the ambient temperature as well [74,75,76]. On the other hand, thymol abundance is correlated negatively with temperature, because an increase in thymols’ concentration is favored by a decrease in the ambient temperature. Carvacrol and thymol share a common biosynthetic pathway. The main precursor for the production of these two phenols is γ-terpinene, from which derives carvacrol via an oxidation reaction. Thymol is produced via hydroxylation of an intermediate, namely, p-cymene [77]. Therefore, it is usually the increased or decreased presence of γ-terpinene or/and p-cymene in marjoram essential oil classified as a carvacrol chemotype, because it is dependent on the increased or decreased percentage, respectively, of carvacrol and thymol.
As mentioned above, the most common chemotype is terpinen-4-ol accompanied in many cases by the presence of cis-sabinene hydrate. Cis-sabinene hydrate, together with cis-sabinene hydrate acetate, is considered the responsible compound for the sweet marjoram flavor [78]. Later, other authors reported that terpinen-4-ol also contributes to its characteristic aroma [79]. Nevertheless, cis-sabinene hydrate, rather than its acetate, is more frequently presented in marjoram essential oil. This may be because the acetate derivate is a less stable compound because of cis-sabinene hydrate resistance to temperature [80]. On the contrary, cis- and trans-sabinene hydrate are products of an enzymatic reaction catalyzed by sabinene hydrate synthase [81,82]. Furthermore, the authors of these studies stated that the production ratio of these compounds is 1 (trans-isomer):10 (cis isomer). However, this result was questioned by Novak et al. (2002) [80], who proposed that more enzymes must participate in this reaction, since according to their study, the ratio of 1:10 is not always stable.
Table
Table 1. Origanum majorana essential oil from different geographic regions.
Table 1. Origanum majorana essential oil from different geographic regions.
Plant MaterialExtraction MethodColumn Used for the GC Analysis% YieldChemical CompositionRegionReference
200 g of plant material (the part used is not identified)Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)VB-5
30 × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm		0.8 mL/100 g dry material4-terpinene (28.96%), γ-terpinene (18.57%) and α-terpinene (12.72%), sabinene (8.02%)Morocco[27]
1000 g of the aerial partsHydrodistillation (according to European Pharmacopeia 5th edition guidelines)DB-5
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.33 μm		0.97 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (34.1%), α-terpinene (19.2%), terpineol (8.9%)South West Morocco[60]
10 g of plant materialSteam distillation
(Likens–Nickerson apparatus)		CP-Sil 8
30 m, 0.32 mm		-thymol (14.0%), 3-carene (10.4%), 2-carene (7.8%), terpinen-4-ol (7.8%), sabinene hydrate (6.0%)Greece[57]
100 g of aerial part (stems, leaves and flowers)Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)HP-5MS 30 m × 0.25 mm,
0.25 μm		1.85 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (23.2%), cis-sabinene hydrate (17.5%), γ-terpinene (10.5%), p-cymene (9%), α-terpineol (5.6%)Tunisia[58]
100 g of leavesHydrodistillation (Quik-fit apparatus)HP-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 mm		0.09 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (555.1 μg/g dw), γ-terpinene (192.8 mg/g dw), cis sabinene hydrate (168.8 mg/g dw)Tunisia[35]
100 g of aerial parts) three developmental stages: vegetative, flowering and post-flowering)Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)HP-5MS
30 m × 250 m, 0.25 μM		-terpinen-4-ol (76.94–37.15), cyclohexanol 3,3,5 trimethyl (15.99–5.41), α-terpineol (11.34–0.94); β-cymene (10.56–1.88)Tunisia[47]
-Steam distillationCarbowax 20M
25 m × 0.3 mm		0.20 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (37.10%), p-cymene (12.05%), α-terpineol (7.15%)Greece[69]
LeavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)DB-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm		1.2 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (29.97%), γ-terpinene (15.40%), trans-sabinene hydrate (10.93%), α-terpinene (6.86%) and α-terpineol (6.54%)Egypt[14]
5 gHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)Rtx-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm		-terpinen-4-ol (19.7%), γ-terpinene (18.4), α-terpinene (11.4%), cis-sabinene hydrate (8.6%), sabinene (7.8%)Commercial sample
Germany		[80]
LeavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)DB5
30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm		-carvacrol (57.86%), thymol (13.54%), trans-caryophyllene (11.52%), cymene (6.78%)Iran[49]
Aerial partsHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)DB-5 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm-terpinen-4-ol (31.15%), cis-sabinene hydrate (15.76%), p-cymene (6.83%), sabinene (6.91%), trans-sabinene hydrate (3.86%), α-terpineol (3.71%)India[36]
500 g of leavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)HP-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm		0.6 mL/100 g dry materialcis-sabinene hydrate (30.2%), terpinen-4-ol (28.8%), γ-terpinene (7.2%), α-terpineol (6.9%), trans-sabinene hydrate (4.4%), linalyl acetate (3.8%), α-terpinene (3.6%)Venezuela[79]
20 g of aerial part (two vegetative and two generative growth stages)HydrodistillationHP-Innowax
30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm		0.04 to 0.09 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (29.13–32.57%), cis-sabinene hydrate (19.9–29.27%), trans-sabinene hydrate (3.5–11.61%), γ-terpinene (2.11–8.20%), bornyl acetate (1.52–2.94%), linalool (1.05–1.39%)Tunisia[37]
-HydrodistillationSupelcowax
10, 60 m × 0.25
mm, 0.25 μm		0.8 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (30.3%), γ-terpinene (14%), linalool (12%), p-cymol (9.8%), α-pinene (5.9%), camphene (5.8%)Hungary[38]
Flowering plantsHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)Carbowax 20 M, 50 m × 0.32 mm i.d, 0.20 μm1 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (38.4%), cis-sabinene hydrate (15.0%), p-cymene (7.0%), γ-terpinene (6.9%).Reunion Island[39]
-Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)Equity-5
60 m × 0.32 mm, 0.25 μm		0.45–0.50 mL/100 g dry materialcis-sabinene hydrate (20.23–46.27%), terpinen-4-ol (9.32–23.43%), γ-terpinene (5.67–13.76%), α-terpinene (2.98–8.38%), sabinene (4.90–8.17%), trans-sabinene hydrate (5.01–7.34%), α-terpineol (3.41–4.17%)India[50]
LeavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)DB-5 (5% phenylmethylpolysiloxane) capillary column, 60 m
× 0.25 mm		1.6 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (30.0%), γ-terpinene
(11.3%), trans-sabinene hydrate (10.8%)		Egypt[26]
131 g leavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)OPTIMAL-5
0.25 μm, 30
M, 0.25 mm		-pulegone (57.05%), verbenone (16.92%), trans-menthone (8.57%)Brasil[60]
0.5 kg of aerial partHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)HP-5
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm		-carvacrol (74.8%), thymol (2.7%)Greece[19]
--DB-1MS
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm		-terpinen-4-ol (22.96%), linalool (15.32%), γ-terpinene (12.92%), p-cymene (6.37%)Commercial sample, Korea[24]
--VF-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm		-terpinen-4-ol (33.8%), terpinolene (16.5%), linalool (14.7%), α-terpinene
(6.8%)		Commercial sample[28]
20 g dried leavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)-12.70 μL·g−1terpinen-4-ol (23.83%) cis-β-terpineol (21.63%),-[20]
--DB-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm		-1,8-cineole (50.96%), linalool (24.04%), limonene (6.38%)India[64]
Two samples from different regions were analyzedHydrodistillation-6.5–7.7 mL/100 g dry materialcarvacrol (78.27–79.46%), p-cymene (4.31–4.68%), y-terpinene (3.72–4.84%)Turkey[56]
100 g of fresh plant materialSteam distillationSE-54 50 m × 0.32 mm linalool (32.68%), terpinen-4-ol (22.30%), p-cymene (8.07%)Morocco[61]
80 g of aerial partsHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)HP-5MS
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm		17.2 g/kgterpinen-4-ol (20.9%), linalool (15.7%), linalyl acetate (13.9%), limonene (13.4%), α-terpineol (8.57%)Pakistan[40]
1 kg of dried aerial partsHydrodistillationDB-5
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.33 µm		0.4 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (29.6%), δ-2-carene (20.1%), camphene (13.4%), α-pinene (7.9%)Italy[12]
100 g dried aerial partsHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)Cp WAX 52 CB
50 m × 0.32 mm, 1.2 µm		-carvacrol (52.5%), linalool (45.4%),Turkey[51]
100 g of dried aerial part
▪
Microwave-assisted extraction (MWE)
▪
Hydrodistillation (HD)
▪
Steam distillation (SD)
TR-5 MS
30 m × 0.32 mm, 0.25 μm		(HD) 0.73 mL/100 g dry material
(MWE) 0.80 mL/100 g dry material
(SD) 0.66 mL/100 g dry material		terpinen-4-ol MWE: 22.28%, HD: 28.49%, SD: 26.72%
trans-sabinene hydrate MWE: 13.05%, HD: 11.69%, SD: 3.04%
γ-terpinene MWE: 13.20%, HD: 7.87%, SD: 13.72%
α-terpinene MWE: 9.07%, HD 3.89%, SD: 9.46%		Egypt[48]
300 g of plant materialHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)-1.7 mL/100 g dry materialterpin-4-ol (27.32%), γ-terpinene (15.67%), α-terpinene (11.08%) α-terpineol (6.90%), sabinene (5.53%)Tunisia[52]
Aerial partsExtraction with organic solventZB-5MS (Phenomenex), 30 m ×
0.25 mm, 0.25 µm		 trans-sabinene hydrate (16.0%), sabinene (14.1%), cis-sabinene hydrate (11.8%), γ-terpinene (10.2%), α-terpinyl acetate (10.0%), α-terpinene (8.9%)Yemen[63]
--DB-5
30 × 0.25 × 2.5 mm		-terpinen-4-ol (20.55%), terpinene (13.13%), trans-terpineol (12.67%), 2-carene (7.67%), sabinene (6.96%)-[41]
--ZB-5 MS
30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm		-linalyl acetate (16.0%), linalool (14.7%), α-terpineol (13.8%), limonene (11.5%)Commercial sample produced in Ukraine[66]
-Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)HP-5MS
30 m× 0.25 mm, 0.25 mm		-terpinen-4-ol (32.69%), γ-terpinene (12.88%), trans-sabinene hydrate (8.47%), α-terpinene (7.98%), sabinene (6.21%)-[16]
200 g of aerial partHydrodistillation (Dean–Stark apparatus)VB5
30 m × 0.25 mm 0.25 μm		1.06 mL/100 g dry materialSabinene hydrate (14.08%), α-terpineol (13.95%), (-)-terpinen-4-ol (13.07%), (+)-sabinene (5.67%)Morocco[62]
--HP-5
30 m× 0.32 mm× 0.25 mm		-1,8-cineole (20.9%), terpinen-4-ol (20.4%), p-cymene (7.0%), sabinene (6.7%)Commercial sample Egypt[65]
Dried leavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)DB-5
30 m × 0.25 mm 0.25 mm		1.20 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (30.41%), γ-terpinene (13.94%), cis-sabinene hydrate (9.64%), α-terpinene (7.70%)Egypt[53]
--Restek
30 m × 0.32 mm, 0.50 μm		-terpinen-4-ol (21.3%), trans-sabinene hydrate (15.5%), γ-terpinene (14.0%) and α-terpinene
(8.9%)		Commercial product Albania[54]
Aerial parts of plant material collected in different regionsHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)FSC
60 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm		-terpinen-4-ol (8–14%), linalyl acetate (7–10%), trans-sabinene hydrate (6–7%)Turkey[42]
100 g of air-dried
aerial parts		Hydrodistillation
(Dean–Stark apparatus)		HP-101
25 m × 0.32 mm		1.40 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (32.8%), y-terpinene (9.9%), cis-sabinene hydrate (8.6%)Tunisia[55]
Dried leavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)TR-5MS
30 m × 0.25
mm, 0.25 μm		2.5 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (33.0%), caryophyllene oxide (11.9%), p-cymene (6.8%), α-terpineol (6.7%) spathulenol (6.0%)Commercial sample
China		[43]
200 g dried flowers
200 g dried leaves		Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)Supelcowax 10
30 m × 0.32 mm,
0.5 pm		12.8 mL/100 g dry material (flowers)
8% ml/100 g dry material (leaves)		Leaves: cis-sabinene hydrate (33.3%), terpinen-4-ol (21.6%), y-terpinene (8.3%), α-terpineol (7.3%), trans-sabinene hydrate (4.7% )
Flowers: cis-sabinene hydrate (24%), terpinen-4-ol (16.6%), α-terpineol (12.4%), y-terpinene (10.6%)
Stems: terpinen-4-ol (19%), α-terpineol (14.25%), y-terpinene (11.1%), cis-sabinene hydrate (7.4%)		Cyprus[70]
FlowersSteam distillationDB-1
60 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 pm		0.3 mL/100 g dry materiallinalyl acetate (26.1%), sabinene (12%), y-terpinene (8.8%), cis-sabinene hydrate (8.7%)Iran[67]
-----Egypt[44]
--DB-1
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm		-terpinen-4-ol (20.8%), γ-Terpinene (14.1%), cis-sabinene hydrate (10.8%) sabinene (9.3%), α-terpinene (9.2%)Commercial sample
UK		[45]
300 g of aerial partsHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)-1.72 mL/100 g dry materialterpinen-4-ol (26.7%), γ-terpinene (16.96%), p-menthenol (11.85%), α-terpinen (9.22%), α-terpineol (5.76%),
p-cymene (5.27%)		Tunisia[46]
Dried leavesHydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)Durabond-DB5
30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm		-γ-terpinene (25.73%), α-terpinene (17.35%), terpinen-4-ol (17.24%), sabinene (10.8%), β-phellandreneEgypt[68]
200 g aerial part
(a)
Microwave-assisted hydrodistillation
(b)
Hydrodistillation
HP-5 ms capillary
30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm		5 mL/100 g of dry material
(a)
carvacrol (41.3%), linalool (12.2%), terpinen-4-ol (6.6%), linalyl acetate (6.8%), γ-terpinene (5.1%)
(b)
carvacrol (39.1%), linalool (7.2%), terpinen-4-ol (10.1%), linalyl acetate γ-terpinene (6.8%), (3.2%)
Greece[71]
-Hydrodistillation (clevenger apparatus)-0.2 mL/100 g of dry materialcarvacrol (43.7%), thymol (18.3%), γ-terpinene (14.1%), o-cymene (8.1%), α-terpinene (2.0%)Greece[83]
In the studies mentioned in this review paper, the concentration of cis- and trans-sabinene hydrate ranges from 0.95% to 46.27%. This difference can be explained by taking into account the influence of abiotic components on the production of essential oils. As reported in the study of Novak et al. (2002) [80], increased temperature resulted in increased production of sabinene hydrate. In addition, apart from the effect of temperature, a longer period of sunlight had a positive influence on the production of cis- and trans-isomers, while the opposite was observed regarding the terpinene content [84]. Furthermore, row planting arrangement seems to be important. Single-row planting yielded essential oils richer in sabinene than binate rows. This effect was explained by the fact that single rows receive more sunlight [85]. On the other hand, the cyclic monoterpenes α- and γ-terpinene are frequently stated as components of the essential oil. Terpinen-4-ol, α-terpinene and γ-terpinene are typical products derived from a rearrangement reaction that follows the distillation process due to elevated temperature [86,87].

3. Insecticidal, Fumigant and Repellent Activity of O. majorana Essential Oil

Secondary metabolites are studied for their biological activity in an attempt to replace the use of synthetic compounds, since naturally derived products seem to relate with fewer side effects concerning human health. The field of study of secondary metabolites is multifarious. This review paper focuses on the studies dealing with the research being conducted in an attempt to replace chemical pesticides with essential oils.
The term pesticide includes different types of products, for example, insecticides, repellents, fungicides and many more. In fact, synthetic pesticides are currently used to protect crops and plants from insect pests. Although the effectiveness of these products is widely accepted, at the same time, concern is raised due to their toxicity because of pesticide residues in the crop. One crucial difference of an essential oil with a synthetic pesticide is the fact that due to its volatility, it is quickly degraded and thus does not remain on the surface of the final edible product. In addition, soil and water contamination are often completely avoidable [22].
Origanum majorana essential oil has been tested mainly against Lepidoptera such as Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval; Ephestia kuehniella Zeller; Plodia interpunctella Hübner; Corcyra cephalonica [20,26,29,30]; Coleoptera, including Weevil Sitophilus oryzae, Tribolium castaneum and Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky [24,31,32]; Hemiptera such as Apis fabae L and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) [26,71]; and Tetranychidae such as Tetranychus urticae Koch [28]. The above-mentioned pests can infect either stored food or destroy crops. In both cases, the damage caused results in nutritional and economic losses. However, exposure of adults or larvae insects at different concentrations of essential oil resulted in population decline with high rates of mortality (Table 2). This effect is certainly attributed to the chemical composition of the essential oil and, of course, depends on the percentage and configuration of the compounds that are present. These compounds may have an additive effect. However, synergism or antagonism may also appear. A variation between the quantity of the oil used is observed, which is rather expected, since according to data given in Table 1, neither the composition of the essential oil nor the percentage of its constituents is the same. Therefore, to explain the biological activity, it is necessary to understand first the activity of every single compound of the essential oil, to explain their degradative behavior, to study their half-life and to explain their physicochemical properties. Unfortunately, such data are not yet clear or are very limited. For example, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), in their conclusion report on pesticide peer review [88], mentions the half-life of only three compounds, namely, α-terpinene, p-cymene and d-limonene.
In Table 3 is given information regarding the effect of pure compounds on insects’ survival. Data presented in this table refer to the concentration used against various types of insects, in order to examine their repellent, fumigant and insecticide activity. When the experiment refers to mortality, the concentration chosen to present here (when different doses were tested) was not that which had a 100% mortality. This derives from our thoughts that the lower the dose, the lower might be any other undesirable side effects (for example, toxicity to the plant or to beneficial insects for the crop). In addition, the rate of mortality for the adult insects given is that observed on the third day after treatment, since developmental delays or other developmental problems are better observed on this day. On the contrary, larvae insects’ mortality rates are given on the first day of treatment. As for the repellent activity, data are discussed at the shortest time of exposure and at the lowest concentration tested.
Comparing the data from Table 2 and Table 3, it is concluded that different doses are required in order for the essential oil or a pure compound to exert its pesticide activity. This is normally dependent not only on the targeted species or strain but also on the chemistry of the compound(s) used (as discussed below). Among the most prominent compounds in terms of their effect and the concentration used are terpinen-4-ol, linalool, camphor, carvone, dihydrocarvone, 1,8 cineole, γ-terpinene and myrcene. Structures and the terpene class to which these compounds belong are shown in Figure 1. For example, Abbassy et al. (2009) [26] studied the effect of γ-terpinene and terpinen-4-ol against Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval. γ-terpinene was more active than terpinen-4-ol, but both compounds acted synergistically with profenofos and methomyl, an organophosphate and a carbamate pesticide, respectively. The binary system used boosted the insecticidal activity of these two synthetic pesticides. Such synergistic activity was able to reduce the concentration of profenofos or methomyl, resulting in less harmful residues in food and the environment. Tribolium castaneum was found to be susceptible to myrcene, R(-)-carvone [23], terpinen-4-ol [90], carvacrol and thymol [83]. Volatiles have also been studied against the genus Sitophilus (S. oryzae, S. granarius (L.), C. glomerata, P. xylostella and S. zeamais Motschulsky [24,25,89,91,92]. The mortality rate of camphor, linalool, carvacrol, terpinen-4-ol, 1,8-cineole, carvone and dihydrocarvone, was high in the studied species and reached 100% for most of the compounds tested.
Taken together, the data presented here show that terpinen-4-ol was one of the compounds to almost always have a remarkable insecticidal or fumigant activity. Linalool, camphor and carvone are also worth mentioning. As can be seen in Figure 1, their activity, apart from the sensitivity of each species, is also dependent on the chemical structure of each compound. Kim et al. (2016) [24] reported that an aldehyde, ketone or alcohol group enhances the activity of a monoterpene. Consequently, compounds bearing the above-mentioned groups are more active with respect to monoterpenes hydrocarbons. Terpinen-4-ol and linalool belong both to tertiary alcohols. Both compounds were highly active against the insects tested. This is in accordance with the study of Seo et al. (2009) [93]; however, both these conclusions, are opposite to the observations of Choi et al. (2007) [94], who reported in their study that primary alcohols were the most active compounds regarding their nematicidal activity. Furthermore, it has been reported that aldehydes monoterpenes are more active than ketone monoterpenes. However, this is not always the rule, as according to data herein presented, camphor, carvone and dihydrocarvone are among the most active compounds [25,89]. Finally, the presence of an unsaturated α, β bond enhances the insecticidal activity of a compound, as in the case of linalool and carvone [95]. It remains to be clarified, however, why myrcene, an acyclic monoterpene bearing only methyl and methylene groups and γ-terpinene, a menthane monoterpene, presented better activity against camphor and linalool in inhibiting Tribonium castaneum [23] and Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval [26]. Maybe the membrane integrity and permeability of the insects are more prone to these compounds.
Data presented in this review paper are promising regarding the possible replacement of synthetic pesticides with those derived from natural sources. Nonetheless, some important issues should be addressed. For example, the use of essential oils as pesticides, apart from their decreased risk of adverse health effects, should at the same time outweigh the use of synthetic ones in effectiveness. In addition, their production must be economically more advantageous. Usually, the yield of O. majorana essential oil is low (from 0.4 to 1.85 mL/100 g, taking for example data extracted from this study). Consequently, a large amount of plant material is needed, and the most important is that the plant used should grow exactly under the same conditions and should be cropped in the same developmental stage. Thus, controlled environment agriculture should be used to grow plants. Furthermore, another issue to evaluate is the effect of the essential oil on crop development and on beneficial insects such as bees and butterflies. The studies mentioned here do not examine these parameters, which are of major importance. The toxic effect discussed focus on the capacity of the essential oil against insects’ lethality. In addition, few studies compare the activity of the essential oil with that of an appropriate control, namely, a synthetic pesticide, so as to extract more reliable conclusions [26]. Last but not least, duration of protection and solubility of the compounds in water or another environmentally friendly medium, should be evaluated [96]. The use of low concentrations of the isolated volatile compounds may simplify their dissolution in inorganic solvents.

4. Conclusions and Future Trends

Several research teams have examined the volatile profile of Origanum majorana. Steam distillation is the technique most used to collect the essential oil; however, a considerable variation between the studies was revealed, which is attributed to the plant itself (i.e., developmental stage) or the different geographic areas, which means, at the same time, different climatic and soil conditions. Despite this variability, and regardless of the constituent present in abundance, the essential oil from Origanum majorana possesses considerable insecticide activity. Indeed, such biological activity is of paramount importance. Given the exposure of humans and the environment to pesticide residues, a great effort is made to replace synthetic pesticides with natural and consequently less harmful ones. Origanum majorana is one promising example of such possible use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.K., D.D., C.K. and P.A.T.; methodology, E.H.K., D.D. and C.K.; investigation, E.K., D.D. and C.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K.; writing—review and editing, E.K., D.D., C.K., P.-K.R., E.K., S.D., D.P. and P.A.T.; supervision, D.P. and P.A.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH–CREATE–INNOVATE (project code: T2EDK-03105). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramos da Silva, L.R.; Ferreira, O.O.; Cruz, J.N.; de Jesus Pereira Franco, C.; Oliveira Dos Anjos, T.; Cascaes, M.M.; Almeida da Costa, W.; Helena de Aguiar Andrade, E.; Santana de Oliveira, M. Lamiaceae Essential Oils, Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant, and Biological Activities. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 6748052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oalđe Pavlović, M.; Kolarević, S.; Đorđević, J.; Jovanović Marić, J.; Lunić, T.; Mandić, M.; Kračun Kolarević, M.; Živković, J.; Alimpić Aradski, A.; Marin, P.D.; et al. A Study of Phytochemistry, Genoprotective Activity, and Antitumor Effects of Extracts of the Selected Lamiaceae Species. Plants 2021, 10, 2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tamokou, J.D.D.; Mbaveng, A.T.; Kuete, V. Antimicrobial Activities of African Medicinal Spices and Vegetables in Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa. In Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa, 1st ed.; Kuete, V., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 207–237. ISBN 978-0-12-809286-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Singla, P.; Vasudeva, N. Origanum majorana L.-Phyto-pharmacological review. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 2015, 6, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bina, F.; Rahimi, R. Sweet Marjoram: A Review of Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 22, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hossain, M.B.; Camphuis, G.; Aguiló-Aguayo, I.; Gangopadhyay, N.; Rai, D.K. Antioxidant activity guided separation of major polyphenols of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) using flash chromatography and their identification by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2014, 37, 3205–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sahranavard, S.; Ghafari, S.; Mosaddegh, M. Medicinal plants used in Iranian traditional medicine to treat epilepsy. Seizure 2014, 23, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Amaghnouje, A.; Mechchate, H.; Es-safi, I.; Alotaibi, A.A.; Noman, O.M.; Nasr, F.A.; Al-zharani, M.; Cerruti, P.; Calarco, A.; EL Fatemi, H.; et al. Anxiolytic, Antidepressant-Like Proprieties and Impact on the Memory of the Hydro-Ethanolic Extract of Origanum majorana L. on Mice. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gutiérrez, R.M.P.; Felipe Fernando Martínez Jerónimo, F.F.M.; Soto, J.G.C.; Ramírez, A.M.; Mendoza, M.F.E. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polyphenols from the polyherbal formulation of Cinnamomum verum, Origanum majorana, and Origanum vulgare and their anti-diabetic capacity in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Heliyon 2022, 8, e08682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soliman, A.M.; Desouky, S.; Marzouk, M.; Sayed, A.A. Origanum majorana Attenuates Nephrotoxicity of Cisplatin Anticancer Drug through Ameliorating Oxidative Stress. Nutrients 2016, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Ouedrhiri, W.; Mechchate, H.; Moja, S.; Mothana, R.A.; Noman, O.M.; Grafov, A.; Greche, H. Boosted Antioxidant Effect Using a Combinatory Approach with Essential Oils from Origanum compactum, Origanum majorana, Thymus serpyllum, Mentha spicata, Myrtus communis, and Artemisia herba-alba: Mixture Design Optimization. Plants 2021, 10, 2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Della Pepa, T.; Elshafie, H.S.; Capasso, R.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I.; Nazzaro, F.; Scognamiglio, M.R.; Caputo, L. Antimicrobial and Phytotoxic Activity of Origanum heracleoticum and O. majorana Essential Oils Growing in Cilento (Southern Italy). Molecules 2019, 24, 2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arranz, E.; Jaime, L.; Lopez, M.C.; Reglero, G.; Santoyo, S. Supercritical fluid extraction as an alternative process to obtain essential oils with anti-inflammatory properties from marjoram and sweet basil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 67, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mossa, A.T.; Nawwar, G.A. Free radical scavenging and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of Origanum majorana L. essential oil. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2011, 30, 1501–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Athamneh, K.; Alneyadi, A.; Alsamri, H.; Alrashedi, A.; Palakott, A.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Eid, A.H.; Al Dhaheri, Y.; Iratni, R. Origanum majorana Essential Oil Triggers p38 MAPK-Mediated Protective Autophagy, Apoptosis, and Caspase-Dependent Cleavage of P70S6K in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Abbasi-Maleki, S.; Kadkhoda, Z.; Taghizad-Farid, R. The antidepressant-like effects of Origanum majorana essential oil on mice through monoaminergic modulation using the forced swimming test. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2019, 10, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ou, M.C.; Hsu, T.F.; Lai, A.C.; Lin, Y.T.; Lin, C.C. Pain relief assessment by aromatic essential oil massage on outpatients with primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2012, 38, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aboelhadid, S.M.; Abdel-Tawab, H.; Mahran, H.A.; Daferera, D.; Sokmen, A.; Al-Quraishy, S.; Abdel-Baki, A.S. Synergistic larvicidal and repellent effects of essential oils of three Origanum species on Rhipicephalus annulatus tick. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 87, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Giatropoulos, A.; Kimbaris, A.; Michaelakis, A.; Papachristos, D.P.; Polissiou, M.G.; Emmanouel, N. Chemical composition and assessment of larvicidal and repellent capacity of 14 Lamiaceae essential oils against Aedes albopictus. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 1953–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prabu, S.; Jing, D.; Chandran, V.; Mathew, P. Insecticidal activity of Origanum majorana L. essential oil as anti-cholinergic agent. Entomol. Res. 2020, 50, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P.; Maipas, S.; Kotampasi, C.; Stamatis, P.; Hens, L. Chemical Pesticides and Human Health: The Urgent Need for a New Concept in Agriculture. Front. Public Health 2016, 4, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.C.; Dinu-Pirvu, C.E.; Fierascu, I.; Paunescu, A. The application of essential oils as a next-generation of pesticides: Recent developments and future perspectives. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2020, 75, 183–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Caballero-Gallardo, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Stashenko, E.E. Repellent activity of essential oils and some of their individual constituents against Tribolium castaneum herbst. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, S.W.; Lee, H.R.; Jang, M.J.; Jung, C.S.; Park, I.K. Fumigant Toxicity of Lamiaceae Plant Essential Oils and Blends of Their Constituents against Adult Rice Weevil Sitophilus oryzae. Molecules 2016, 21, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kordali, Ş.; Usanmaz, A.; Bayrak, N.; Çakır, A. Fumigation of volatile monoterpenes and aromatic compounds against adults of Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Rec. Nat. Prod. 2017, 11, 362. [Google Scholar]
  26. Abbassy, M.A.; Abdelgaleil, S.A.M.; Rabie, R.Y.A. Insecticidal and synergistic effects of Majorana hortensis essential oil and some of its major constituents. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2009, 131, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. El-Akhal, F.; El Ouali Lalami, A.; Ez Zoubi, Y.; Greche, H.; Guemmouh, R. Chemical composition and larvicidal activity of essential oil of Origanum majorana (Lamiaceae) cultivated in Morocco against Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pavela, K.R.; Stepanycheva, E.; Shchenikova, A.; Chermenskaya, T.; Petrova, M. Essential oils as prospective fumigants against Tetranychus urticae. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ayvaz, A.; Karaborklu, S.; Sagdic, O. Fumigant toxicity of five essential oils against the eggs of Ephestia kuehniella zeller and Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Asian J. Chem. 2009, 21, 596–604. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavela, R. Insecticidal activity of some essential oils against larvae of Spodoptera littoralis. Fitoterapia 2005, 76, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sharma, N.; Dubey, N.K.; Sharma, K. Screening of Insecticidal Activity of Origanum majorana Oil Against Tribolium Castenium. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2008, 6, 203–208. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang, Y.; Isman, M.B.; Tak, J.H. Insecticidal Activity of 28 Essential Oils and a Commercial Product Containing Cinnamomum cassia Bark Essential Oil against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. Insects 2020, 11, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Werker, E. Function of essential oil-secreting glandular hairs in aromatic plans of Lamiaceae: A review. Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Salakhutdinov, N.; Volcho, K.; Yarovaya, O. Monoterpenes as a renewable source of biologically active compounds. Pure Appl. Chem. 2017, 89, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jelali, N.; Dhifi, W.; Chahed, T.; Marzouk, B. Salinity effects on growth, essential oil yield and composition and phenolic compounds content of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) leaves. J. Food Biochem. 2011, 35, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Raina, A.P.; Negi, K.S. Essential oil composition of Origanum majorana and Origanum vulgare spp. hirtum growing in India. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2012, 47, 1015–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sellami, I.H.; Maamouri, E.; Chahed, T.; Wannes, W.A.; Kchouk, M.E.; Marzouk, B. Effect of growth stage on the content and composition of the essential oil and phenolic fraction of sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 30, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vagi, E.; Simandi, B.; Suhajda, A.; Hethelyi, E. Essential oil composition and antimicrobial activity of Origanum majorana L. extracts obtained with ethyl alcohol and supercritical carbon dioxide. Food Res. Int. 2005, 38, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vera, R.R.; Chane-Ming, J. Chemical composition of the essential oil of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) from Reunion Island. Food Chem. 1999, 66, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hussain, A.I.; Anwar, F.; Rasheed, S.; Nigam, P.S.; Janneh, O.; Sarker, S.D. Composition, antioxidant and chemotherapeutic properties of the essential oils from two Origanum species growing in Pakistan. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2011, 21, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Da Cunha, J.A.; de Ávila Scheeren, C.; Fausto, V.P.; de Melo, L.; Henneman, B.; Frizzo, C.P.; de Almeida Vaucher, R.; Castagna de Vargas, A.; Baldisserotto, B. The antibacterial and physiological effects of pure and nanoencapsulated Origanum majorana essential oil on fish infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tabanca, N.; Özek, T.; Baser, K.H.C.; Tümen, G. Comparison of the Essential Oils of Origanum majorana L. and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004, 16, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jiang, Z.T.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.H.; Guan, W.Q. Volatile Oil Composition of Natural Spice, Origanum majorana L. Grown in China. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2011, 14, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Edris, A.E.; Shalaby, A.S.; Fadel, H.H. Effect of organic agriculture practices on the volatile aroma components of some essential oil plants growing in Egypt II: Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana L.) essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baratta, M.T.; Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Ruberto, G. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of some commercial essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 1998, 13, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Raouafi, K.; Nefzi, H.; Esghaier, B.; Sadfi, N.; Abderrabba, M.; Sameh Ayadi, S. Biological activity and characterization of essential oil of areal part from Origanum majorana L.: First report of antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum and against his biofilm. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2021, 12, 746–756. [Google Scholar]
  47. Khadhri, A.; Bouali, I.; Aouadhi, C.; Lagel, M.C.; Masson, E.; Pizzi, A. Determination of phenolic compounds by MALDI-TOF and essential oil composition by GC-MS during three development stages of Origanum majorana L. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2019, 33, e4665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ragab, T.I.; El Gendy, A.N.G.; Saleh, I.A.; Esawy, M.A. Chemical composition and evaluation of antimicrobial activity of the Origanum majorana essential oil extracted by microwave-assisted extraction, conventional hydro-distillation and steam distillation. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Partovi, R.; Talebi, F.; Sharifzadeh, A. Antimicrobial Efficacy and Chemical Properties of Caryophyllus aromaticus and Origanum majorana Essential Oils Against Foodborne Bacteria Alone and in Combination. Int. J. Enteric. Pathog. 2018, 6, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Verma, R.S.; Padalia, R.C.; Chauhan, A.; Verma, R.K.; Rahman, L.; Singh, A. Changes in the Essential Oil Composition of Origanum majorana L. During Post Harvest Drying. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2016, 19, 1547–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Erdogan, A.; Ozkan, A. Investigatıon of Antioxıdative, Cytotoxic, Membrane-Damaging and Membrane-Protective Effects of The Essentıal Oil of Origanum majorana and its Oxygenated Monoterpene Component Linalool in Human-Derived Hep G2 Cell Line. Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 16, 24–34. [Google Scholar]
  52. Salha, G.B.; Díaz, R.H.; Labidi, J.; Abderrabba, M. Deterpenation of Origanum majorana L. essential oil by reduced pressure steam distillation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Busatta, C.; Vidal, R.S.; Popiolski, A.S.; Mossi, A.J.; Dariva, C.; Rodrigues, M.R.; Corazza, F.C.; Corazza, M.L.; Vladimir Oliveira, J.; Cansian, R.L. Application of Origanum majorana L. essential oil as an antimicrobial agent in sausage. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schmidt, E.; Bail, S.; Buchbauer, G.; Stoilova, I.; Krastanov, A.; Stoyanova, A.; Jirovetz, L. Chemical Composition, Olfactory Evaluation and Antioxidant Effects of the Essential oil of Origanum majorana L. from Albania. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 1934578X0800300704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ezzeddine, N.B.H.B.; Abdelkefi, M.M.; Aissa, R.B.; Chaabouni, M.M. Antibacterial screening of Origanum majorana L. oil from Tunisia. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 295–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Baser, K.H.C.; Kirimer, N.; Tümen, G. Composition of the Essential Oil of Origanum majorana L. from Turkey. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1993, 5, 577–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Daferera, D.J.; Ziogas, B.N.; Polissiou, M.G. GC-MS analysis of essential oils from some Greek aromatic plants and their fungitoxicity on Penicillium digitatum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2576–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hajlaoui, H.; Mighri, H.; Aouni, M.; Gharsallah, N.; Kadri, A. Chemical composition and in vitro evaluation of antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxicity and anti-acetylcholinesterase properties of Tunisian Origanum majorana L. essential oil. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 95, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chaves, R.D.S.B.; Martins, R.L.; Rodrigues, A.B.L.; Rabelo, É.M.; Farias, A.L.F.; Brandão, L.B.; Santos, L.L.; Galardo, A.K.R.; de Almeida, S.S.M.D.S. Evaluation of larvicidal potential against larvae of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) and of the antimicrobial activity of essential oil obtained from the leaves of Origanum majorana L. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amor, G.; Caputo, L.; La Storia, A.; De Feo, V.; Mauriello, G.; Fechtali, T. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Artemisia herba-alba and Origanum majorana Essential Oils from Morocco. Molecules 2019, 24, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Charai, M.; Mosaddak, M.; Faid, M. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Two Aromatic Plants: Origanum majorana L. and O. compactum Benth. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1996, 8, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Makrane, H.; Aziz, M.; Berrabah, M.; Mekhfi, H.; Ziyyat, A.; Bnouham, M.; Legssyer, A.; Elombo, F.K.; Gressier, B.; Eto, B. Myorelaxant Activity of essential oil from Origanum majorana L. on rat and rabbit. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 228, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Al-Fatimi, M. Volatile constituents, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the aerial parts of Origanum majorana L. from Yemen. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2018, 23, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, Y.C.; Lee, S.H.; Clark, J.M.; Ahn, Y.J. Ovicidal and adulticidal activities of Origanum majorana essential oil constituents against insecticide-susceptible and pyrethroid/malathion-resistant Pediculus humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Waller, S.B.; Madrid, I.M.; Ferraz, V.; Picoli, T.; Cleff, M.B.; de Faria, R.O.; Meireles, M.C.A.; de Mello, J.R.B. Cytotoxicity and anti-Sporothrix brasiliensis activity of the Origanum majorana Linn. Oil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Baj, T.; Baryluk, A.; Sieniawska, E. Application of mixture design for optimum antioxidant activity of mixtures of essential oils from Ocimum basilicum L., Origanum majorana L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 115, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Barazandeh, M.M. Essential Oil Composition of Origanum majorana L. from Iran. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 76–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dantas, A.D.S.; Klein-Júnior, L.C.; Machado, M.S.; Guecheva, T.N.; Dos Santos, L.D.; Zanette, R.A.; de Mello, F.B.; Pêgas Henriques, J.A.; de Mello, J.R. Origanum majorana Essential Oil Lacks Mutagenic Activity in the Salmonella/Microsome and Micronucleus Assays. Sci. World J. 2016, 2016, 3694901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Komaitis, M.E.; Ifanti-Papatragianni, N.; Melissari-Panagiotou, E. Composition of the essential oil of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.). Food Chem. 1992, 45, 117–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Arnold, N.; Bellomaria, B.; Valentini, G.; Arnold, H.J. Comparative Study of the Essential Oils from Three Species of Origanum Growing Wild in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1993, 5, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Petrakis, E.A.; Kimbaris, A.C.; Perdikis, D.C.; Lykouressis, D.P.; Tarantilis, P.A.; Polissiou, M.G. Responses of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) to three Lamiaceae essential oils obtained by microwave-assisted and conventional hydrodistillation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 62, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Farsi, M.; Abdollahi, F.; Salehi, A.; Ghasemi, S. Growth Responses of Origanum majorana L. to Methyl Jasmonic Acid under Limited Irrigation Conditions. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bağci, Y.; Kan, Y.; Doğu, S.; Çelik, S.A. The Essential Oil Compositions of Origanum majorana L. Cultivated in Konya and Collected from Mersin-Turkey. Indian. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2017, 51, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Novak, J.; Lukas, B.; Franz, C. Temperature Influences Thymol and Carvacrol Differentially in Origanum spp. (Lamiaceae). J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 412–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vaičiulytė, V.; Butkiene, R.; Ložienė, K. Effects of meteorological conditions and plant growth stage on the accumulation of carvacrol and its precursors in Thymus pulegioides. Phytochemistry 2016, 128, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ale Omrani Nejad, S.M.H.; Naghdi Badi, H.; Mehrafarin, A.; Abdossi, V.; Khalighi-Sigaroodi, F. The Impact of Macro Environmental Factors on Essential Oils of Oliveria decumbens Vent. from Different Regions of Iran. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 2018, 14, 59456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Poulose, A.J.; Croteau, R. Biosynthesis of aromatic monoterpenes: Conversion of γ-terpinene to p-cymene and thymol in Thymus vulgaris L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1978, 187, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fischer, N.; Nitz, S.; Drawert, F. Original flavour compounds and the essential oil composition of marjoram (Majorana hortensis moench). Flavour Fragr. J. 1987, 2, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ramos, S.; Rojas, L.B.; Lucena, M.E.; Meccia, G.; Usubillaga, A. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Origanum majorana L. Essential Oil from the Venezuelan Andes. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2011, 23, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Novak, J.; Langbehn, J.; Pank, F.; Franz, C.M. Essential oil compounds in a historical sample of marjoram (Origanum majorana L., Lamiaceae). Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hallahan, T.W.; Croteau, R. Monoterpene biosynthesis: Demonstration of a geranyl pyrophosphate:sabinene hydrate cyclase in soluble enzyme preparations from sweet marjoram (Majorana hortensis). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1988, 264, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hallahan, T.W.; Croteau, R. Monoterpene biosynthesis: Mechanism and stereochemistry of the enzymatic cyclization of geranyl pyrophosphate to (+)-cis- and (+)-trans-sabinene hydrate. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1989, 269, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Papanikolaou, N.E.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Iliopoulos, V.; Evergetis, E.; Skourti, A.; Nika, E.P.; Haroutounian, S.A. Essential Oil Coating: Mediterranean Culinary Plants as Grain Protectants against Larvae and Adults of Tribolium castaneum and Trogoderma granarium. Insects 2022, 13, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Circella, G.; Franz, C.; Novak, J.; Resch, H. Influence of day length and leaf insertion on the composition of marjoram essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 1995, 10, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. De Falco, E.; Mancini, E.; Roscigno, G.; Mignola, E.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Senatore, F. Chemical composition and biological activity of essential oils of Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L. under different growth conditions. Molecules 2013, 18, 14948–14960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Wesolowska, A.; Jadczak, D.; Grzeszczuk, M. Influence of distillation time on the content and composition of essential oil isolated from lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.). Herba Pol. 2010, 56. [Google Scholar]
  87. Turek, C.; Stintzing, F.C. Stability of essential oils: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. 2013, 12, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance terpenoid blend QRD-460. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rozman, V.; Kalinovic, I.; Korunic, Z. Toxicity of naturally occurring compounds of Lamiaceae and Lauraceae to three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Saad, M.; El-Deeb, D.A.; Abdelgaleil, S. Insecticidal potential and repellent and biochemical effects of phenylpropenes and monoterpenes on the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 6801–6810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yi, C.G.; Hieu, T.T.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, B.R.; Kwon, M.; Ahn, Y.J. Toxicity of Lavandula angustifolia oil constituents and spray formulations to insecticide-susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant Plutella xylostella and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1202–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yıldırım, E.; Emsen, B.; Kordali, S. Insecticidal effects of monoterpenes on Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2013, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Seo, S.M.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.G.; Shin, C.H.; Shin, S.C.; Park, I.K. Fumigant antitermitic activity of plant essential oils and components from Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi), Allspice (Pimenta dioica), caraway (Carum carvi), dill (Anethum graveolens), Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens), and Litsea (Litsea cubeba) oils against Japanese termite (Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6596–6602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Choi, I.H.; Park, J.Y.; Shin, S.C.; Kim, J.; Park, I.K. Nematicidal activity of medicinal plant essential oils against the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2007, 42, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Nerio, L.S.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Stashenko, E. Repellent activity of essential oils: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Weidenhamer, J.D.; Macias, F.A.; Fischer, N.H.; Williamson, G.B. Just how insoluble are monoterpenes? J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19, 1799–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 01982 g001 550
Figure 1. Terpenoids with insecticide, repellent and fumigant activity.
Figure 1. Terpenoids with insecticide, repellent and fumigant activity.
Life 12 01982 g001
Table
Table 2. Activity of Origanum majorana essential oil against agricultural insects.
Table 2. Activity of Origanum majorana essential oil against agricultural insects.
Species ExaminedFamily/OrderDose UsedEffectReference
Corcyra cephalonicaPyralidae/Lepidoptera11.31 μL/L air (adult)
49.83 μL/L air (larvae)		Fumigant toxicity[20]
Spodoptera littoralis BoisduvalNoctuidae/Lepidoptera2.48 μg
3.14 g/L
1.86 g/L
2.27 g/L		Insecticidal activity[26]
Aphis fabae L.Aphididae/Hemiptera
Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychidae/Tetranychidae15 μg/cm2Fumigant activity[28]
Ephestia kuehniella ZellerPyralidae/Lepidoptera200 μg/L air
200 μg/L air		Fumigant activity[29]
Plodia interpunctella (Hübner)Pyralidae/Lepidoptera
Spodoptera littoralisNoctuidae/Lepidoptera19.6 mL/m3 LD50Insecticidal activity[30]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidae/Coleoptera100 ppmRepellent activity[31]
Sitophilus zeamais MotschulskyCurculionidae/Coleoptera0.18 mg/cm2Insecticidal activity[32]
Myzus persicae (Sulzer)Aphididae/Hemiptera500 μL/LLongevity and fecundity[71]
Tribolium. castaneum (Herbst)
Trogoderma granarium (Everts)		Tenebrionidae/Coleoptera
Dermestidae/Coleoptera		1000 ppmInsecticidal activity[83]
Table
Table 3. Activity of pure compounds against agricultural insects.
Table 3. Activity of pure compounds against agricultural insects.
Species Examined
Method of Exposure		Compound NameDose Requested for the Activity and % Effect after the Application (in Parenthesis)Reference
Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval
Topical application/Residual film		terpinen-4-ol16.20 μg/larva32.94 g/L[26]
γ-terpinene11.86 μg/larva23.94 g/L
RapidAphis fabae L.
Rapid dipping/Residual film		terpinen-4-ol14.86 g/L20.77 g/L
γ-terpinene12.24 g/L18.03 g/L
Sitophilus oryzae
filter paper disc		camphene6.5 mg/L (10%)[24]
α-terpinene25 mg/L (52%)
sabinene hydrate6.5 mg/L (26%)
terpinolene25 mg/L (98%)
linalool6.5 mg/L (74%)
camphor6.5 mg/L (22%)
α-terpineol1.5 mg/L (18%)
terpinen-4-ol3 mg/L (88%)
Rhyzopertha dominica
filter paper disc		1,8-cineole0.1 μL/720 mL (97.5%)[89]
linalyl acetate0.1 μL/720 mL (90%)
carvacrol0.1 μL/720 mL (82.5%)
camphor0.1 μL/720 mL (100%)
linalool0.1 μL/720 mL (100%)
bornyl acetate0.1 μL/720 mL (92.5%)
borneol0.1 μL/720 mL (92.5%)
thymol0.1 μL/720 mL (77.5%)
linalyl acetate0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
Tribolium castaneum
filter paper disc		1,8-cineole0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
carvacrol0.1 μL/720 mL (5.0%)
camphor0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
linalool0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
bornyl acetate0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
borneol0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
thymol0.1 μL/720 mL (0.00%)
Sitophilus oryzae
filter paper disc		linalyl acetate0.1 μL/720 mL (100%)
1,8-cineole0.1 μL/720 mL (100%)
carvacrol0.1 μL/720 mL (85%)
camphor0.1 μL/720 mL (90%)
linalool0.1 μL/720 mL (90%)
bornyl acetate0.1 μL/720 mL (97.5%)
borneol0.1 μL/720 mL (100%)
thymol0.1 μL/720 mL (100%)
Tribolium castaneum
surface-film bioassay (contact toxicity)		terpinen-4-ol0.21 mg/cm2[90]
α-terpinene>0.50 mg/cm2
p-cymene>0.50 mg/cm2
Tribolium castaneum
surface-film bioassay (fumigant toxicity)		terpinen-4-ol20.47 mg/cm2
α-terpinene23.70 mg/cm2
p-cymene27.01 mg/cm2
Tribolium castaneum
area preference method (repellent activity)		terpinen-4-ol0.001 mg/cm2 (23.3% RI 1, 2 h)
α-terpinene0.001 mg/cm2 (80.0%% RI 1, 2 h)
p-cymene0.001 mg/cm2 (66.70%% RI 1, 2 h)
Plutella xylostella
vapor-phase mortality bioassay (fumigant toxicity)		 JJ-PX P. xylostella larvaeKS-PX P. xylostella larvae[91]
linalool0.021 mg cm−30.016 mg cm−3
linalool oxide0.024 mg cm−30.016 mg cm−3
terpinen-4-ol0.020 mg cm−30.018 mg cm−3
(1S)-(−)-camphor0.022 mg cm−30.019 mg cm−3
(1R)-(+)-camphor0.029 mg cm−30.024 mg cm−3
1.8-cineole0.029 mg cm−30.037 mg cm−3
p-cymene0.037 mg cm−30.038 mg cm−3
(1R)-(+)-α-pinene0.047 mg cm−30.045 mg cm−3
(1S)-(−)-α-pinene0.040 mg cm−30.052 mg cm−3
(1R)-(+)-β-Pinene0.058 mg cm−30.046 mg cm−3
(1S)-(−)-β-Pinene0.063 mg cm−30.057 mg cm−3
camphene0.060 mg cm−30.074 mg cm−3
α-Terpineol0.069 mg cm−30.076 mg cm−3
(R)-(−)-α-Phelladrene0.109 mg cm−30.087 mg cm−3
(1S)-(−)-Borneol0.140 mg cm−30.121 mg cm−3
(1R)-(+)-Camphor0.029 mg cm−30.024 mg cm−3
Cotesia glomerata
vapor-phase mortality bioassay (fumigant toxicity)		(1S)-(−)-Camphor0.0016 mg cm−3
terpinen-4-ol0.0018 mg cm−3
1.8-cineole0.0039 mg cm−3
bornyl acetate0.0064 mg cm−3
linalool0.0075 mg cm−3
α-terpineol0.0078 mg cm−3
(1S)-(−)-β-pinene0.0083 mg cm−3
α-Terpinyl acetate0.0084 mg cm−3
(1R)-(+)-β-Pinene0.0089 mg cm−3
(1R)-(+)-α-Pinene0.018 mg cm−3
nerol0.0093 mg cm−3
neryl acetate0.012 mg cm−3
linalyl acetate0.014 mg cm−3
camphene0.015 mg cm−3
(1S)-(−)-α-Pinene0.015 mg cm−3
geranyl acetate0.016 mg cm−3
limonene0.016 mg cm−3
γ-Terpinene0.017 mg cm−3
β-Caryophyllene0.018 mg cm−3
myrcene0.019 mg cm−3
p-cymene0.021 mg cm−3
(R)-(−)-α-phelladrene0.025 mg cm−3
limonene0.027 mg cm−3
α-Terpinene0.026 mg cm−3
geraniol0.032 mg cm−3
Cotesia glomerata
leaf-dip bioassay (residual toxicity)		 JJ-PX P. xylostella larvaeKS-PX P. xylostella larvae
terpinen-4-ol0.0538 mg cm−20.0405 mg cm−2
linalool0.0582 mg cm−20.0489 mg cm−2
linalool oxide0.0654 mg cm−20.0521 mg cm−2
(1S)-(−)-camphor0.0816 mg cm−20.0737 mg cm−2
p-cymene0.1586 mg cm−20.1388 mg cm−2
1,8-cineole0.1726 mg cm−20.1552 mg cm−2
(1R)-(+)-α-pinene0.4996 mg cm−20.4486 mg cm−2
Tribolium castaneum (Herbst)
(area preference method)		myrcene2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (8%)[23]
carvacrol2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (8%)
geraniol2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (6%)
geranyl acetate2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (5%)
nerol2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (8%)
p-cymene2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (−6%)
R(-) carvone2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (21%)
S(+) carvone2 × 10−5 μL/cm2 (−10%)
Sitophilus granarius (L.)
(petri dishes)		camphene10 μg/petri dish (22.2%)[25]
3-carene8.7 μg/petri dish (88.9%)
limonene8.4 μg/petri dish (91.9%)
myrcene7.9 μg/petri dish (79.8%)
γ-terpinene8.5 μg/petri dish (80.8%)
borneol10 μg/petri dish (54.5%)
linalool8.6 μg/petri dish (100%)
thymol10 μg/petri dish (73.7%)
carvacrol9.8 μg/petri dish (100%)
nerol8.8 μg/petri dish (100%)
terpinen-4-ol10 μg/petri dish (100%)
α-terpineol10 μg/petri dish (62.6%)
1.8-cineole9.2 μg/petri dish (100%)
camphor10 μg/petri dish (49.5%)
carvone9.6 μg/petri dish (100%)
dihydrocarvone9.3 μg/petri dish (100%)
Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky
(petri dishes)		camphene10 μg (4.04%)[92]
3-carene10 μg (47.47%)
limonene10 μg (6.06%)
myrcene10 μg (4.04%)
α-pinene10 μg (4.04%)
β-pinene10 μg (3.03%)
linalool10 μg (76.77%)
nerol10 μg (3.03%)
terpinen-4-ol10 μg (96.97%)
α-terpineol10 μg (45.45%)
1.8-cineole10 μg (89.90%)
camphor10 μg (75.76%)
carvone10 μg (100%)
dihydrocarvone10 μg (100%)
1 RI: repellent activity.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kakouri, E.; Daferera, D.; Kanakis, C.; Revelou, P.-K.; Kaparakou, E.H.; Dervisoglou, S.; Perdikis, D.; Tarantilis, P.A. Origanum majorana Essential Oil—A Review of Its Chemical Profile and Pesticide Activity. Life 2022, 12, 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121982

AMA Style

Kakouri E, Daferera D, Kanakis C, Revelou P-K, Kaparakou EH, Dervisoglou S, Perdikis D, Tarantilis PA. Origanum majorana Essential Oil—A Review of Its Chemical Profile and Pesticide Activity. Life. 2022; 12(12):1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121982

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kakouri, Eleni, Dimitra Daferera, Charalabos Kanakis, Panagiota-Kyriaki Revelou, Eleftheria H. Kaparakou, Sofia Dervisoglou, Dionysios Perdikis, and Petros A. Tarantilis. 2022. "Origanum majorana Essential Oil—A Review of Its Chemical Profile and Pesticide Activity" Life 12, no. 12: 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121982

APA Style

Kakouri, E., Daferera, D., Kanakis, C., Revelou, P.-K., Kaparakou, E. H., Dervisoglou, S., Perdikis, D., & Tarantilis, P. A. (2022). Origanum majorana Essential Oil—A Review of Its Chemical Profile and Pesticide Activity. Life, 12(12), 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121982

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop