You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Life
  • Review
  • Open Access

24 June 2021

New Insights into Profibrotic Myofibroblast Formation in Systemic Sclerosis: When the Vascular Wall Becomes the Enemy

,
,
,
and
1
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
2
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Anatomy and Histology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
This article belongs to the Section Physiology and Pathology

Abstract

In systemic sclerosis (SSc), abnormalities in microvessel morphology occur early and evolve into a distinctive vasculopathy that relentlessly advances in parallel with the development of tissue fibrosis orchestrated by myofibroblasts in nearly all affected organs. Our knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying such a unique relationship between SSc-related vasculopathy and fibrosis has profoundly changed over the last few years. Indeed, increasing evidence has suggested that endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT), a process in which profibrotic myofibroblasts originate from endothelial cells, may take center stage in SSc pathogenesis. While in arterioles and small arteries EndoMT may lead to the accumulation of myofibroblasts within the vessel wall and development of fibroproliferative vascular lesions, in capillary vessels it may instead result in vascular destruction and formation of myofibroblasts that migrate into the perivascular space with consequent tissue fibrosis and microvessel rarefaction, which are hallmarks of SSc. Besides endothelial cells, other vascular wall-resident cells, such as pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, may acquire a myofibroblast-like synthetic phenotype contributing to both SSc-related vascular dysfunction and fibrosis. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the differentiation of myofibroblasts inside the vessel wall provides the rationale for novel targeted therapeutic strategies for the treatment of SSc.

1. Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc, or scleroderma) is a multifaceted autoimmune disorder characterized by widespread microvascular abnormalities occurring early during the disease and evolving into a distinctive vasculopathy that inexorably advances in parallel with the development of tissue fibrosis [1,2,3,4]. The microvascular disease may present clinically as Raynaud’s phenomenon, abnormal nailfold capillaries, digital ulcers, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and scleroderma renal crisis [5,6] and together with myofibroblast-orchestrated untreatable skin and internal organ fibrosis, often lead to organ failure accounting for the high morbidity and mortality of SSc [1,2,3]. Over the past few years, many steps forward have been made in the knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the unique relationship between SSc-related vasculopathy and fibrosis [2,3,7]. In this context, a process in which profibrotic myofibroblasts originate from vascular endothelial cells (ECs), namely endothelial-to-myofibroblast transition, commonly referred to as endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT), has been assumed to take center stage [8,9]. Indeed, if in arterioles and small arteries EndoMT is supposed to lead to the accumulation of myofibroblasts within the vessel wall, with consequent development of fibroproliferative vascular lesions, in capillary vessels it may result in significant microvascular destruction due to disappearance of ECs and concomitant formation of myofibroblasts migrating into the perivascular space, thus leading to tissue fibrosis and microvessel rarefaction [8]. Interestingly, it appears that other vascular wall-resident cells, such as pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), may acquire a myofibroblast-like profibrotic phenotype contributing to both SSc-related vascular dysfunction and fibrosis [8].
In this review, after a brief description of the main pathologic characteristics of the microvasculature in SSc, we discuss the mechanisms underlying the differentiation of myofibroblasts inside the vessel wall and their contribution to vasculopathy and tissue fibrosis in this disease. An overview of the main therapeutic strategies that have been proposed to counteract SSc-associated tissue fibrosis, with a particular focus on the blockade of profibrotic myofibroblast differentiation from vascular wall-resident cells, will also be provided.

2. The Normal Vascular Wall

The vascular system is fundamental to deliver oxygen and nutrients to tissues and remove CO2 and tissue waste matter, a process that is conducted by both macro- and micro-vasculature. The macro-vasculature is composed of large vessels that rapidly transport blood toward or away from organs, while micro-vasculature consists of small vessels including arterioles, capillaries and postcapillary venules [10,11]. The innermost layer of each of these vessels is lined with ECs that interact with the circulation and respond to various stimuli, coordinating the vessel response to changes in nutrients, oxygen and different molecules including hormones. Although all blood vascular ECs are thought to derive from mesodermal progenitors, it has been demonstrated that they are able not only to express different genes/proteins depending on the type of vessel to which they belong, but also to acquire tissue-specific characteristics, especially in capillaries [10,11]. As an example, ECs comprising brain and retina capillaries express high levels of tight junctions in order to restrict the passage of different molecules in the circulation, while in liver and kidney capillaries, these cells present fenestrations that allow for extensive filtration of a variety of factors [10]. Inside the vascular wall, ECs are also surrounded by other cell types such as pericytes, VSMCs and fibroblasts/fibroblast-like cells, in a measure that varies depending upon anatomical location within the vasculature, as well as organ or tissue type [11]. Structurally, the wall of arteries and arterioles consists of three layers, the innermost and thinnest of which is represented by the tunica intima, a single continuous EC layer supported by subendothelial connective tissue. The tunica media surrounds the tunica intima and is comprised of VSMCs that control the vessel caliber and the volume of blood flow via contraction or relaxation, as well as elastic and collagen fibers circularly arranged around the vessel; the tunica adventitia instead constitutes the outermost layer and is entirely composed of connective tissue that allows to anchor vessels to surrounding tissues [11,12]. In particular, arteries present a thick vessel wall with multiple layers of VSMCs, while arterioles are surrounded by a thinner muscular wall [11]. As far as the structural organization of small capillaries, their thin wall presents a single layer of ECs connected with a basement membrane hosting pericytes, a kind of supportive cells that maintain capillary vessel integrity [10,13,14]. Moreover, because of the absence of a continuous smooth muscle layer, the wall of these microvessels lacks vasomotor function [11]. The structure of capillaries is organ-specific, with a morphology that is perfectly suited for the needs of the tissue [10,15].

4. The Pathogenic Role of Vascular Wall-Resident Cells in Systemic Sclerosis: Linking Vasculopathy to Fibrosis

Since microvascular injury clearly represents the initial event in SSc pathogenesis, but the true remarkable feature of the disease is represented by widespread tissue fibrosis, it is conceivable that different vascular wall-resident cells including ECs, pericytes and VSMCs may be central in establishing this unique relationship between vasculopathy and fibrosis.

4.1. Endothelial Cells

In recent years, numerous studies have significantly expanded our knowledge about the plausible mechanisms underlying EC dysregulation and the contribution of these cells to the main pathogenic features of SSc. The initial EC damage may be induced by different triggers including anti-endothelial autoantibodies, infections, environmental factors, ischemia-reperfusion events and reactive oxygen species [1]. Once injured, ECs are believed to undergo two distinct fates: cell activation or cell death [4,19]. In the first case, ECs function abnormally, becoming unable to promote angiogenesis and leading to increased endothelin-1 (ET-1) production and impaired nitric oxide and prostacyclin release, an imbalance that mediates vasospasm and contributes to both intimal proliferation and vascular wall fibrosis [2,3,4,18]. Activated ECs in SSc also undergo cytoskeletal rearrangement, loss of tight junctions and increase in adhesion molecule, cytokine and growth factor expression, thus enhancing the interaction with circulating immune cells and contributing to tissue inflammation [2,3,4,18]. Moreover, activated ECs may determine platelet activation and consequent intravascular fibrin deposition, finally resulting in luminal narrowing and vessel obstruction [2,3,4,18]. On the other hand, EC apoptosis is known to account for the loss of peripheral capillary network and the consequent chronic tissue ischemia, which cannot be compensated by an adequate and functional angiogenesis [2,3,18].
In this context, the recently described EndoMT, a transdifferentiation process consisting of a phenotypic switch of ECs toward profibrotic myofibroblasts, adds to endothelial activation/loss in promoting both SSc-related microvascular dysfunction and tissue fibrosis [8,9,43]. In particular, during EndoMT, ECs go through a profound morphologic change consisting of disaggregation, loss of polarity, acquisition of the typical fibroblast-like spindly shape, migratory and invasive abilities and enhanced resistance to apoptosis [8,43,44,45]. Immunophenotypically, ECs encounter a downregulation of their specific markers CD31/platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin and von Willebrand factor (vWF) and acquire myofibroblast products, including α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), S100A4/fibroblast-specific protein-1 and type I collagen [8,43,44,45]. A pivotal role in inducing the gene expression program responsible for EndoMT is played by the activation, stabilization and nuclear translocation of Snail1, a transcription factor that is upregulated in SSc [8,43,44,45]. Furthermore, the EndoMT process may be triggered by several cytokines and growth factors such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), ET-1, interleukin-1β (IL1-β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Notch and Wnt ligands, as well as by caveolin-1 deficiency, hypoxia and oxidative stress [8,9,43,44].
In recent years, increasing evidence supports the implication of EndoMT in the development of the main pathologic aspects of SSc, namely dermal fibrosis, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and PAH [8,43,44,46,47,48].
In the skin, the concomitant expression of endothelial and myofibroblast markers has been detected in ECs from SSc-affected dermal microvessels (Figure 1) and in both the bleomycin-induced and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-deficient mouse models of SSc [8,9,43,46,49]. Moreover, explanted SSc dermal microvascular ECs were found not only to co-express endothelial and myofibroblast markers, but also to exhibit a spindle-shaped morphology and a contractile phenotype [46].
Figure 1. Microphotographs of skin sections from healthy individuals and patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) subjected to double immunofluorescence for the endothelial cell marker CD31 (red) and the myofibroblast marker α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; green). Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue). In healthy skin microvessels, α-SMA expression is restricted to pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells surrounding endothelial cells. In SSc skin microvessels, endothelial cells undergoing endothelial-to-myofibroblast transition display colocalization of CD31 and α-SMA (yellow staining). In both panels, the inset represents a higher magnification view of the dermal microvessel pointed by arrow.
Of note, comparable phenotypic, morphologic and functional features were also detected in healthy dermal microvascular ECs upon stimulation with SSc sera [46]. In this regard, the pro-EndoMT effect exerted by SSc sera has been in part attributed to matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12)-dependent uPAR cleavage, a process that had already been implicated in both SSc impaired angiogenesis and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation [46]. Strikingly, MMP-12 is known to be significantly increased in SSc sera and tissues [50] and its upregulation has been recently supposed to be partially triggered by SSc fibroblast-mediated extracellular acidosis [51]. Indeed, the acidic milieu generated by the highly glycolytic SSc fibroblasts has been reported to induce MMP-12 overexpression and consequent uPAR cleavage in ECs, making these cells prone to undergo EndoMT [51]. Recently, it has also been demonstrated that SSc sera are able to induce a fibroblastic morphology in murine ECs. In particular, sera from Scl70 + SSc patients significantly upregulated the expression of the EndoMT markers plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, type I collagen, and α-SMA in respect to control sera, suggesting that EndoMT-promoting signals are more represented in those patients characterized by a higher risk of visceral involvement [52]. Two different studies have further demonstrated the role of the profibrotic mediators ET-1 and TGF-β in the induction of the EndoMT program in dermal ECs. In the former, ET-1 and TGF-β stimulation was able to trigger EndoMT in SSc dermal microvascular ECs [53], while in the latter, microvascular ECs explanted from the unaffected skin of SSc patients were reported to transdifferentiate toward profibrotic myofibroblasts when co-cultured with SSc fibroblasts from affected skin and concomitantly treated with ET-1 and TGF-β [54]. Besides triggering EndoMT in the skin, the master fibrogenic cytokine TGF-β is able to induce this transdifferentiation process also in internal organs. Experimentally, constitutive EC-specific activation of TGF-β signaling in transgenic mice indeed led to a strong expression of genes related to myofibroblast activation, resulting in a severe cutaneous and pulmonary fibrosis, with important perivascular ECM deposition and subendothelial thickening of small arterioles resembling the typical SSc alterations [55]. Among the various mechanisms of action exerted by TGF-β in inducing EndoMT, it has been demonstrated that this profibrotic molecule is able to abrogate the activity of Friend leukemia integration factor 1 (Fli1), a transcription factor important for the maintenance of EC homeostasis [8,43]. Accordingly, SSc dermal microvascular ECs undergoing EndoMT showed a significant Fli1 downregulation in culture [46] while ex vivo, mice with a conditional Fli1 deletion in ECs exhibited a significant downregulation of EC markers together with several vascular dysfunctions consistent with those detected in SSc microvasculature [56]. Moreover, Fli1 haploinsufficiency has been found to induce a profibrotic phenotype in dermal ECs of bleomycin-treated mice, further strengthening the involvement of this transcription factor in EndoMT during the development of cutaneous fibrosis [57,58]. Recently, dermal ECs explanted from KLF5+/−; Fli1+/− mice, a new animal model resembling the fundamental pathologic features of SSc, were reported not only to be defective in performing in vitro angiogenesis, but also to have a reduced expression of VE-cadherin and CD31, suggesting the occurrence of EndoMT, as observed in SSc-affected ECs, and highlighting that a deficiency of KLF5 transcription factor may be another important trigger of this process [59]. SSc-related EndoMT has been recently found to be induced also by oncostatin M, a member of the IL-6 family, and the inflammatory lipid mediator leukotriene B4, whose expression levels are increased in SSc [60,61]. In particular, oncostatin M was able to induce EndoMT-like morphologic changes in healthy dermal microvascular ECs, while leukotriene B4 promoted EndoMT in human umbilical vein ECs via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, independently of TGF-β1 release [61]. A putative contribution in EndoMT induction has additionally been attributed, even if only in experimental scleroderma, to abnormal fibrillin-1 expression and chronic oxidative stress in the tight-skin mouse model of SSc [62] and to interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), as demonstrated by the fact that EndoMT is inhibited in the IRF5 knockout mouse model [63]. Interestingly, some molecules that are known to have a role in both SSc-related impaired angiogenesis and tissue fibrosis, namely vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)165b, soluble α-Klotho and caveolin-1 [64,65,66,67], have been correlated to the induction of EndoMT as well [54,68,69,70]. As an example, the antiangiogenic factor VEGF165b has been found to be significantly overexpressed in transitioning ECs of an in vitro model of EndoMT consisting of healthy dermal microvascular ECs cocultured with SSc fibroblasts and concomitantly stimulated with ET-1 and TGF-β [54]. Furthermore, among the molecules that have been recently studied in SSc, it is worth mentioning soluble α-Klotho, a protein with vasculoprotective effects whose expression has been found to be decreased in SSc microvascular ECs and whose in vitro administration was able to significantly improve endothelial functions by acting as a powerful proangiogenic factor [65]. Interestingly, this pleiotropic molecule was shown to significantly ameliorate EndoMT progression in a mouse model of renal fibrosis by targeting TGF-β1/Smad/Snail1 signaling, evidence suggesting a possible therapeutic use of α-Klotho against pathologic fibrosis [68]. As far as the caveolae-associated protein caveolin-1 is concerned, it acts as a crucial inhibitor of tissue fibrosis and its downregulation in different SSc dermal cell types including microvascular ECs and fibroblasts has been broadly implicated in SSc-related tissue fibrosis [66,67,71]. Remarkably, caveolin-1 deficiency has also been related to EndoMT, with pulmonary ECs explanted from caveolin-1 knockout mice displaying high levels of mesenchymal/myofibroblast markers such as type I collagen, α-SMA and Snail [70]. Finally, the antiangiogenic molecule semaphorin 3E, which has been found to contribute to defective angiogenesis of SSc dermal microvascular ECs and to participate in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a transdifferentiation process similar to EndoMT, might have a possible role in SSc-associated EndoMT, as well [8,43,72].
The presence of ECs undergoing EndoMT has been detected not only in the skin but also in the lungs of SSc patients, where this cell transdifferentiation may contribute to two important SSc-related complications such as PAH and ILD [47,48,73,74]. Colocalization of vWF and α-SMA, indicative of the occurrence of EndoMT, has been reported in both pulmonary arterioles of patients with SSc-associated PAH and in a murine model of hypoxia-induced PAH [75]. Moreover, the same authors reported that the exposure of healthy pulmonary artery ECs to inflammatory cytokines led to a significant reorganization of their actin cytoskeleton and the development of a myofibroblast-like morphology [75]. Interestingly, ECs in intermediate stages of EndoMT have been also found in lung tissue of patients suffering from SSc-associated ILD [74]. This evidence has been further confirmed in a subsequent study reporting significant expression of different mesenchymal cell/myofibroblast-specific genes in lung microvascular ECs isolated from SSc patients affected by ILD [76]. Recently, the fate of ECs was investigated during bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by means of EC-specific genetic lineage tracing mice. Here, the induction of fibrosis caused an increased expression of different myofibroblast markers, but no changes in endothelial markers in lung ECs, suggesting the occurrence of a partial EndoMT [52]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that macrophage depletion, together with bleomycin injection, was able to contribute to EndoMT-associated gene increase in pulmonary ECs, indicating a possible role of lung macrophages in preserving EC morphology and preventing fibrosis [52].
As recently proposed, it is important to point out that the SSc-related EndoMT process may play different pathogenic roles on the basis of the type of affected vessels, both in the skin and in internal organs [8,43,47]. In particular, when affecting arterioles and small arteries, EndoMT may contribute to the so-called “fibroproliferative vasculopathy”, consisting of myofibroblast accumulation in the vessel subintima and media, with consequent thickening of the vessel wall and occlusive vascular disease (Figure 2). The main clinical manifestations of such a profound vessel remodeling are represented by digital ulcers, gangrene of the extremities, SSc-associated PAH, scleroderma renal crisis and myocardial blood vessel anomalies [8,43,47].
Figure 2. In systemic sclerosis, vasculopathy affecting arterioles and small arteries in the skin and internal organs features fibrosis of the tunica adventitia, hyperplasia of the tunica media and thickening of the tunica intima, eventually leading to luminal occlusion. Fibroproliferative structural changes of the vascular wall are driven mainly by the differentiation of profibrotic myofibroblasts from fibroblasts and endothelial cells through the processes of fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition and endothelial-to-myofibroblast transition, respectively, as well as the transition of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from a contractile to a synthetic/proliferative phenotype.
On the contrary, EndoMT occurring in the thin wall of capillary vessels may result in an increase in the number of perivascular profibrotic myofibroblasts and a parallel loss of ECs, thus providing a unique link between tissue fibrosis and “destructive vasculopathy”, a process clinically evident in SSc skin by nailfold video-capillaroscopy and characterized by capillary rarefaction and disturbed angiogenic responses (Figure 3) [8,43,47]. Thus, the well-known capillary rarefaction commonly observed in fibrotic tissues should not be further regarded as a mere consequence of microvessel entrapment in the fibrotic ECM, but rather as an important pathogenic process fueling tissue fibrosis via EndoMT.
Figure 3. In the skin and internal organs of systemic sclerosis, the differentiation of capillary wall-resident endothelial cells and pericytes into profibrotic myofibroblasts (i.e., endothelial-to-myofibroblast and pericyte-to-myofibroblast transitions) results in destructive vasculopathy characterized by progressive capillary rarefaction and contributes concomitantly to tissue fibrosis alongside fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition.

4.2. Pericytes

Pericytes are perivascular cells embedded in the basement membrane and directly interacting with the endothelium of capillaries, precapillary arterioles and postcapillary venules in all human organs [8,43,77,78]. Because of their close relationship with ECs, pericytes inside the capillary wall play an important role in endothelial barrier development/maintenance and their dysfunction or loss has been related to many microvascular diseases, including hypoxia, hypertension and diabetic retinopathy, as well as fibrosis, inflammation and cancer [79,80]. From a functional point of view, these perivascular cells display contractile properties with which they regulate blood flow by varying the microvessel diameter in response to vasoactive molecules [8,43,77], while immunophenotypically they are characterized by the expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β (PDGFR-β), chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 4 (also known as nerve/glial antigen 2 or NG2), CD135, nestin, desmin and the transcription factor FoxD1 [8,43,78]. Interestingly, they have also been shown to express the myofibroblastic marker α-SMA, an immunophenotypic feature that makes them an additional plausible source of activated myofibroblasts [8,43,78]. In this regard, several studies have indicated the evidence of a pericyte-to-myofibroblast transition in different fibrotic disorders including pulmonary, liver, kidney and myocardial fibrosis [81,82,83,84]. In addition, it has been recently demonstrated that pericyte-to-myofibroblast differentiation represents a primary hallmark of tissue fibrosis occurring during organ aging, with age-associated tissue-specific molecular changes in the endothelium driving the acquisition of a profibrotic phenotype in pericytes with progressive microvascular loss and tissue accumulation of myofibroblasts [84]. Of note, in skin- and muscle-wounding experiments, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM)12+ lineage-derived pericytes were demonstrated to be able to migrate into the perivascular tissue and differentiate into myofibroblasts [85] and, in a similar way, pericytes were found to detach from the microvasculature, migrate into the interstitial space and express profibrotic proteins after spinal cord injury [86,87]. Likewise, pulmonary pericytes explanted from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were reported to be proner to migrate and invade the surrounding extracellular matrix, suggesting that these cells may play an important role in the development of lung fibrosis [88].
As far as SSc is concerned, different preclinical and experimental studies underlined the contribution of pericytes to the appearance of profibrotic myofibroblasts [89,90,91,92,93]. In particular, in the affected skin of SSc patients with the diffuse cutaneous subset pericytes were proved to express type I collagen and the ED-A fibronectin splice variant, an isoform that is de novo expressed during wound healing and fibrotic changes [89], while in mouse pulmonary pericytes stimulation with TGF-β1 was able to increase mRNA expression of type I collagen, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and α-SMA, suggesting the occurrence of a transdifferentiation process in these cells [92]. Moreover, an immunophenotypic analysis of myofibroblasts and perivascular mesenchymal cells in the bleomycin-induced rat scleroderma model demonstrated that pericytes may be considered as possible myofibroblast progenitors in the sclerotic lesions of these animals [93].
Interestingly, since pericytes exhibit a great plasticity with an ability to differentiate into different mesenchymal populations such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes and fibroblasts, they can be considered a type of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) [8,43,94,95]. In addition, pericytes and MSCs derived from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) share some cell markers including PDGFR-β, α-SMA, NG2 and desmin, with BM-MSCs distributing around vessels and behaving as pericytes in assisting ECs to form and maintain a vascular network in a variety of experimental conditions [8,43,77,95]. Based on this evidence, recent studies employing SSc BM-MSCs as pericyte surrogates demonstrated that these stem cells display a myofibroblast-like phenotype and may participate in the accumulation of profibrotic myofibroblasts in SSc skin [96,97]. Moreover, it was demonstrated that SSc BM-MSCs express higher levels of ADAM12 in respect to healthy MSCs and that a pathologic microenvironment enriched in TGF-β1 may contribute to pericyte-to-myofibroblast differentiation by further increasing ADAM12 expression, which indeed acts as a positive regulator of the profibrotic TGF-β1 signaling cascade [97]. Furthermore, prolonged exposure of BM-MSCs to a profibrotic milieu mimicking the SSc microenvironment increased the tendency of these cells to differentiate into myofibroblasts [98]. Finally, similarly to human SSc BM-MSCs, it has been reported that also BM-MSCs from the KLF5+/−; Fli1+/− murine model of SSc display enhanced migration, proliferation and collagen production in response to TGF-β1, thus showing a preferential differentiation toward myofibroblasts instead of behaving as pericyte precursors [59].
Collectively, the aforementioned studies support the notion that, in concert with EndoMT, pericyte-to-myofibroblast transition inside the wall of capillary vessels may contribute to SSc-related “destructive vasculopathy” and the concomitant tissue accumulation of profibrotic myofibroblasts driving fibrosis of the skin and internal organs (Figure 3).

4.3. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

VSMCs are highly specialized cells that are located in the vascular tunica media and whose main functions consist of regulating blood vessel tone, stream and pressure [99]. While fully differentiated VSMCs exhibit a quiescent “contractile” phenotype, with a very low proliferation rate and the expression of specific contractile proteins (i.e., smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, smooth muscle 22α and calponin), after vascular injury they switch to a dedifferentiated or highly “synthetic” phenotype, becoming proliferative/migratory and displaying production of ECM proteins and reduced expression of VSMC-specific markers [99]. Such a “synthetic” phenotype has been found to participate in the development of different pathologic conditions including atherosclerosis, hypertension, and neointima formation [99,100,101,102]. Of note, VSMCs can also switch to the non-canonical myofibroblast-like phenotype, characterized by increased expression of fibronectin 1, osteoprotegerin, type I collagen and upregulation of fibroblast specific pathways [102,103]. These myofibroblast-like cells have been identified in mouse plaques, particularly accumulating in the fibrous cap, and in a single-cell RNA sequencing dataset from human coronary plaques [102,104], but such a phenotypic change in VSMCs might occur in the vessels of SSc patients, as well.
In this context, to date it has been demonstrated that SSc VSMCs are characterized by higher proliferation rates, increased metabolic activity and enhanced resistance to apoptosis, likely contributing to the altered structure of the vascular wall in SSc patients [105]. Moreover, when stimulated with agonistic anti-PDGFR autoantibodies isolated from SSc sera, healthy pulmonary VSMCs were shown to acquire a “synthetic” phenotype consisting of higher proliferation and migration activities, type I collagen production and reduced expression of the typical “contractile” markers, thus contributing to hyperplasia of the tunica media as well as intimal thickening [106].
It is well known that VSMCs may originate from multipotent BM-MSCs [107,108]. For this reason, a recent study analyzed the differentiation potential of SSc BM-MSCs toward VSMCs and fibroblasts in response to different key factors including CTGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) and TGF-β1 [98]. Indeed, the SSc profibrotic microenvironment may lead to distinct differentiation processes in such multipotent cells ranging from VSMCs with “contractile” or “synthetic” phenotypes to two functionally different fibroblast populations, namely fibroblasts and activated myofibroblasts [98]. Interestingly, the authors demonstrated that SSc BM-MSCs responded to CTGF with impaired physiologic “contractile” VSMC differentiation, and to b-FGF with a shift toward a “synthetic” phenotype. Mostly, SSc BM-MSCs exhibited increased commitment toward myofibroblast differentiation after induction with TGF-β1 in respect to healthy cells, with SSc-MSC-derived myofibroblasts functionally resembling activated SSc lesional fibroblasts [98]. Thus, the authors concluded that deregulated plasticity of VSMC progenitors might additionally contribute to the severity of SSc vasculopathy [98].
Altogether, currently available data indicate that a switch of VSMCs from a “contractile” to a “synthetic” and “proliferative” phenotype is one of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the formation of SSc-related fibroproliferative vascular lesions (Figure 2).

6. Conclusions

As described in this review, microvascular disease represents a prominent pathologic event in SSc, with vascular wall-resident cells including ECs, pericytes and VSMCs likely being the initial target of the disease process. In particular, increasing evidence reported that, once injured, ECs may undergo two different fates: cell activation, finally resulting in impaired angiogenesis, tissue inflammation and luminal narrowing, or apoptosis, accounting for the loss of peripheral capillary network and consequent tissue ischemia. In addition, the recently described EndoMT process, during which ECs switch toward profibrotic myofibroblasts, is known to strongly contribute to both SSc-related fibroproliferative vascular lesions and capillary rarefaction accompanying the development of progressive tissue fibrosis. Of note, pericyte-to-myofibroblast differentiation and VSMC acquisition of a myofibroblast-like “synthetic” phenotype may additionally participate in these crucial pathologic events. In recent years, the principal mechanisms underlying the formation and consequent accumulation of profibrotic myofibroblasts in SSc have been investigated in depth, leading to the discovery of different molecular pathways (i.e., TGF-β and ET-1 cascade, developmental pathways and JAK/STAT signaling), against which several antifibrotic agents have been tested in preclinical models or are currently under evaluation in different clinical trials. At present, no effective curative strategies are available for SSc treatment, and the main therapeutic approach is merely symptomatic. Thus, the identification of novel drugs able to prevent vascular injury and consequent tissue fibrosis, together with a deeper understanding of preferential associations of different microvascular alterations with specific SSc subsets, may provide the rationale for counteracting the most significant pathogenic aspects and developing more effective and personalized therapies for SSc patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R., I.R., B.S.F. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R., I.R., B.S.F. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, E.R., I.R., B.S.F., M.M.-C. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Varga, J.; Trojanowska, M.; Kuwana, M. Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: Recent insights of molecular and cellular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2017, 2, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sierra-Sepúlveda, A.; Esquinca-González, A.; Benavides-Suárez, S.A.; Sordo-Lima, D.E.; Caballero-Islas, A.E.; Cabral-Castañeda, A.R.; Rodríguez-Reyna, T.S. Systemic sclerosis pathogenesis and emerging therapies, beyond the fibroblast. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 4569826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Korman, B. Evolving insights into the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Transl. Res. 2019, 209, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Asano, Y. The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: An understanding based on a common pathologic cascade across multiple organs and additional organ-specific pathologies. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Trojanowska, M. Cellular and molecular aspects of vascular dysfunction in systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010, 6, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Colaci, M.; Dal Bosco, Y.; Schinocca, C.; Ronsivalle, G.; Guggino, G.; De Andres, I.; Russo, A.A.; Sambataro, D.; Sambataro, G.; Malatino, L. Aortic root dilation in associated with the reduction in capillary density observed at nailfold capillaroscopy in SSc patients. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021, 40, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Kahaleh, B.; Wigley, F.M. Review: Evidence that systemic sclerosis is a vascular disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 1953–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rosa, I.; Romano, E.; Fioretto, B.S.; Manetti, M. The contribution of mesenchymal transitions to the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 7, S157–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Di Benedetto, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Berardicurti, O.; Vomero, M.; Navarini, L.; Dolo, V.; Cipriani, P.; Giacomelli, R. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2021, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Marziano, C.; Genet, G.; Hirschi, K.K. Vascular endothelial cell specification in health and disease. Angiogenesis 2021, 24, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yuan, S.Y.; Rigor, R.R. Structure and function of exchange microvessels. In Regulation of Endothelial Barrier Function; Granger, D.N., Granger, J., Eds.; Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences: San Rafael, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Milutinović, A.; Šuput, D.; Zorc-Pleskovič, R. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in the tunica intima, media, and adventitia of coronary arteries: An updated review. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020, 20, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stratman, A.N.; Malotte, K.M.; Mahan, R.D.; Davis, M.J.; Davis, G.E. Pericyte recruitment during vasculogenic tube assembly stimulates endothelial basement membrane matrix formation. Blood 2009, 114, 5091–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Dijk, C.G.; Nieuweboer, F.E.; Pei, J.Y.; Xu, Y.J.; Burgisser, P.; van Mulligen, E.; el Azzouzi, H.; Duncker, D.J.; Verhaar, M.C.; Cheng, C. The complex mural cell: Pericyte function in health and disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 190, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Potente, M.; Mäkinen, T. Vascular heterogeneity and specialization in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 477–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Feghali-Bostwick, C.; Varga, J. Introduction: The etiopathogenesis of systemic sclerosis—An integrated overview. In Scleroderma, 2nd ed.; Part III The Biological Basis of Systemic Sclerosis; Varga, J., Denton, C., Wigley, F.M., Allanore, Y., Kuwana, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kavian, N.; Batteux, F. Macro- and microvascular disease in systemic sclerosis. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2015, 71, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Manetti, M.; Kahaleh, B. Mechanisms of vascular disease. In Scleroderma, 2nd ed.; Part III The Biological Basis of Systemic Sclerosis; Varga, J., Denton, C., Wigley, F.M., Allanore, Y., Kuwana, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 221–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saygin, D.; Highland, K.B.; Tonelli, A.R. Microvascular involvement in systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Microcirculation 2019, 26, e12440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bruni, C.; Frech, T.; Manetti, M.; Rossi, F.W.; Furst, D.E.; De Paulis, A.; Rivellese, F.; Guiducci, S.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Bellando-Randone, S. Vascular leaking, a pivotal and early pathogenetic event in systemic sclerosis: Should the door be closed? Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Overbeek, M.J.; Vonk, M.C.; Boonstra, A.; Voskuyl, A.E.; Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.; Smit, E.F.; Dijkmans, B.A.; Postmus, P.E.; Mooi, W.J.; Heijdra, Y.; et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A distinctive vasculopathy. Eur. Respir. J. 2009, 34, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ruaro, B.; Confalonieri, M.; Salton, F.; Wade, B.; Baratella, E.; Geri, P.; Confalonieri, P.; Kodric, M.; Biolo, M.; Bruni, C. The relationship between pulmonary damage and peripheral vascular manifestations in systemic sclerosis patients. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bruni, C.; Guignabert, C.; Manetti, M.; Matucci Cerinic, M.; Humbert, M. The multifaceted problem of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020, 3, e149–e159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rooper, L.M.; Askin, F.B. Pathology of systemic sclerosis. In Scleroderma, 2nd ed.; Part III The Biological Basis of Systemic Sclerosis; Varga, J., Denton, C., Wigley, F.M., Allanore, Y., Kuwana, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hassoun, P.M. Lung involvement in systemic sclerosis. Presse Med. 2011, 40, e3–e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dorfmüller, P.; Humbert, M.; Perros, F.; Sanchez, O.; Simonneau, G.; Müller, K.M.; Capron, F. Fibrous remodeling of the pulmonary venous system in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue diseases. Hum. Pathol. 2007, 38, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Iliopoulos, G.; Daoussis, D. Renal dysfunction in systemic sclerosis beyond scleroderma renal crisis. Rheumatol. Int. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zanatta, E.; Codullo, V.; Allanore, Y. Scleroderma renal crisis: Case reports and update on critical issues. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bose, N.; Chiesa-Vottero, A.; Chatterjee, S. Scleroderma renal crisis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 44, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Batal, I.; Domsic, R.T.; Medsger, T.A.; Bastacky, S. Scleroderma renal crisis: A pathology perspective. Int. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 2010, 543704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nikpour, M.; Baron, M. Mortality in systemic sclerosis: Lessons learned from population-based and observational cohort studies. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2014, 26, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ferri, C.; Sebastiani, M.; Lo Monaco, A.; Iudici, M.; Giuggioli, D.; Furini, F.; Manfredi, A.; Cuomo, G.; Spinella, A.; Colaci, M.; et al. Systemic sclerosis evolution of disease pathomorphosis and survival. Our experience on Italian patients’ population and review of the literature. Autoimmun. Rev. 2014, 13, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Luca, G.; Cavalli, G.; Campochiaro, C.; Bruni, C.; Tomelleri, A.; Dagna, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Interleukin-1 and systemic sclerosis: Getting to the heart of cardiac involvement. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 653950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bruni, C.; Ross, L. Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis: Getting to the heart of the matter. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Allanore, Y.; Meune, C. Primary myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis: Evidence for a microvascular origin. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2010, 28, S48–S53. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lambova, S. Cardiac manifestations in systemic sclerosis. World J. Cardiol. 2014, 6, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nussinovitch, U.; Shoenfeld, Y. Atherosclerosis and macrovascular involvement in systemic sclerosis: Myth or reality. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011, 10, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Klein-Weigel, P.; Opitz, C.; Riemekasten, G. Systemic sclerosis—A systematic overview: Part 1—Disease characteristics and classification, pathophysiologic concepts, and recommendations for diagnosis and surveillance. VASA 2011, 40, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Johnson, S.R.; Glaman, D.D.; Schentag, C.T.; Lee, P. Quality of life and functional status in systemic sclerosis compared to other rheumatic diseases. J. Rheumatol. 2006, 33, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. McFarlane, I.M.; Bhamra, M.S.; Kreps, A.; Iqbal, S.; Al-Ani, F.; Saladini-Aponte, C.; Grant, C.; Singh, S.; Awwal, K.; Koci, K.; et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) 2018, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tan, T.C.; Noviani, M.; Leung, Y.Y.; Low, A.H.L. The microbiome and systemic sclerosis: A review of current evidence. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Di Ciaula, A.; Covelli, M.; Berardino, M.; Wang, D.Q.; Lapadula, G.; Palasciano, G.; Portincasa, P. Gastrointestinal symptoms and motility disorders in patients with systemic scleroderma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Romano, E.; Rosa, I.; Fioretto, B.S.; Cerinic, M.M.; Manetti, M. The role of pro-fibrotic myofibroblasts in systemic sclerosis: From origin to therapeutic targeting. Curr. Mol. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kanno, Y. The role of fibrinolytic regulators in vascular dysfunction of systemic sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Thuan, D.T.B.; Zayed, H.; Eid, A.H.; Abou-Saleh, H.; Nasrallah, G.K.; Mangoni, A.A.; Pintus, G. A potential link between oxidative stress and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in systemic sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Manetti, M.; Romano, E.; Rosa, I.; Guiducci, S.; Bellando-Randone, S.; De Paulis, A.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to endothelial dysfunction and dermal fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 924–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Manetti, M.; Guiducci, S.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. The origin of the myofibroblast in fibroproliferative vasculopathy: Does the endothelial cell steer the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis? Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 2164–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sánchez-Duffhues, G.; García de Vinuesa, A.; Ten Dijke, P. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cardiovascular diseases: Developmental signaling pathways gone awry. Dev. Dyn. 2018, 247, 492–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manetti, M.; Rosa, I.; Milia, A.F.; Guiducci, S.; Carmeliet, P.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Inactivation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) gene induces dermal and pulmonary fibrosis and peripheral microvasculopathy in mice: A new model of experimental scleroderma? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Manetti, M.; Guiducci, S.; Romano, E.; Bellando-Randone, S.; Conforti, M.L.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Increased serum levels and tissue expression of matrix metalloproteinase-12 in patients with systemic sclerosis: Correlation with severity of skin and pulmonary fibrosis and vascular damage. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Andreucci, E.; Margheri, F.; Peppicelli, S.; Bianchini, F.; Ruzzolini, J.; Laurenzana, A.; Fibbi, G.; Bruni, C.; Bellando-Randone, S.; Guiducci, S.; et al. Glycolysis-derived acidic microenvironment as a driver of endothelial dysfunction in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2021, keab022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nicolosi, P.A.; Tombetti, E.; Giovenzana, A.; Donè, E.; Pulcinelli, E.; Meneveri, R.; Tirone, M.; Maugeri, N.; Rovere-Querini, P.; Manfredi, A.A.; et al. Macrophages guard endothelial lineage by hindering endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition: Implications for the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2019, 203, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cipriani, P.; Di Benedetto, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Capece, D.; Zazzeroni, F.; Liakouli, V.; Pantano, I.; Berardicurti, O.; Carubbi, F.; Pecetti, G.; et al. The endothelial-mesenchymal transition in systemic sclerosis is induced by endothelin-1 and transforming growth factor-β and may be blocked by macitentan, a dual endothelin-1 receptor antagonist. J. Rheumatol. 2015, 42, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Corallo, C.; Cutolo, M.; Kahaleh, B.; Pecetti, G.; Montella, A.; Chirico, C.; Soldano, S.; Nuti, R.; Giordano, N. Bosentan and macitentan prevent the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) in systemic sclerosis: In vitro study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wermuth, P.J.; Carney, K.R.; Mendoza, F.A.; Piera-Velazquez, S.; Jimenez, S.A. Endothelial cell-specific activation of transforming growth factor-β signaling in mice induces cutaneous, visceral, and microvascular fibrosis. Lab. Investig. 2017, 97, 806–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Asano, Y.; Stawski, L.; Hant, F.; Highland, K.; Silver, R.; Szalai, G.; Watson, D.K.; Trojanowska, M. Endothelial Fli1 deficiency impairs vascular homeostasis: A role in scleroderma vasculopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 1983–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taniguchi, T.; Asano, Y.; Akamata, K.; Noda, S.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Toyama, T.; Trojanowska, M.; Sato, S. Fibrosis, vascular activation, and immune abnormalities resembling systemic sclerosis in bleomycin-treated Fli-1-haploinsufficient mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Manetti, M. Fli1 deficiency and beyond: A unique pathway linking peripheral vasculopathy and dermal fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2015, 24, 256–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Nakamura, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Hirabayashi, M.; Yamashita, T.; Saigusa, R.; Miura, S.; Takahashi, T.; Toyama, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Yoshizaki, A.; et al. Altered properties of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells underlying the development of scleroderma-like vasculopathy in KLF5+/−; Fli-1+/−mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 2136–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Marden, G.; Wan, Q.; Wilks, J.; Nevin, K.; Feeney, M.; Wisniacki, N.; Trojanowski, M.; Bujor, A.; Stawski, L.; Trojanowska, M. The role of the oncostatin M/OSM receptor β axis in activating dermal microvascular endothelial cells in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Liang, M.; Lv, J.; Jiang, Z.; He, H.; Chen, C.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Xue, Y.; Yu, Y.; Yang, S.; et al. Promotion of myofibroblast differentiation and tissue fibrosis by the leukotriene B4-Leukotriene B4 receptor axis in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 1013–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Xu, H.; Zaidi, M.; Struve, J.; Jones, D.W.; Krolikowski, J.G.; Nandedkar, S.; Lohr, N.L.; Gadicherla, A.; Pagel, P.S.; Csuka, M.E.; et al. Abnormal fibrillin-1 expression and chronic oxidative stress mediate endothelial mesenchymal transition in a murine model of systemic sclerosis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 300, C550–C556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Saigusa, R.; Asano, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Yamashita, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Toyama, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; Sugawara, K.; Tsuruta, D.; et al. Multifaceted contribution of the TLR4-activated IRF5 transcription factor in systemic sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15136–15141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Manetti, M.; Guiducci, S.; Romano, E.; Ceccarelli, C.; Bellando-Randone, S.; Conforti, M.L.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Overexpression of VEGF165b, an inhibitory splice variant of vascular endothelial growth factor, leads to insufficient angiogenesis in patients with systemic sclerosis. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, e14–e26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mazzotta, C.; Manetti, M.; Rosa, I.; Romano, E.; Blagojevic, J.; Bellando-Randone, S.; Bruni, C.; Lepri, G.; Guiducci, S.; Ibba-Manneschi, L.; et al. Proangiogenic effects of soluble α-Klotho on systemic sclerosis dermal microvascular endothelial cells. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  66. Del Galdo, F.; Lisanti, M.P.; Jimenez, S.A. Caveolin-1, transforming growth factor-beta receptor internalization, and the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2008, 20, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kulshrestha, R.; Singh, H.; Pandey, A.; Mehta, A.; Bhardwaj, S.; Jaggi, A.S. Caveolin-1 as a critical component in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis of different etiology: Evidences and mechanisms. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2019, 111, 104315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, S.; Yu, L.; He, A.; Liu, Q. Klotho inhibits unilateral ureteral obstruction-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via TGF-β1/Smad2/Snail1 signaling in mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, X.; Pan, L.; Pu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Yang, Z. Loss of caveolin-1 promotes endothelial-mesenchymal transition during sepsis: A membrane proteomic study. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 32, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  70. Li, Z.; Wermuth, P.J.; Benn, B.S.; Lisanti, M.P.; Jimenez, S.A. Caveolin-1 deficiency induces spontaneous endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in murine pulmonary endothelial cells in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Manetti, M.; Allanore, Y.; Saad, M.; Fatini, C.; Cohignac, V.; Guiducci, S.; Romano, E.; Airó, P.; Caramaschi, P.; Tinazzi, I. Evidence for caveolin-1 as a new susceptibility gene regulating tissue fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tseng, C.H.; Murray, K.D.; Jou, M.F.; Hsu, S.M.; Cheng, H.J.; Huang, P.H. Sema3E/plexin-D1 mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ovarian endometrioid cancer. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jimenez, S.A.; Piera-Velazquez, S. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Myth or reality? Matrix Biol. 2016, 51, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mendoza, F.A.; Piera-Velazquez, S.; Farber, J.L.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.; Jiménez, S.A. Endothelial cells expressing endothelial and mesenchymal cell gene products in lung tissue from patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Good, R.B.; Gilbane, A.J.; Trinder, S.L.; Denton, C.P.; Coghlan, G.; Abraham, D.J.; Holmes, A.M. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to endothelial dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 1850–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Piera-Velazquez, S.; Mendoza, F.A.; Addya, S.; Pomante, D.; Jimenez, S.A. Increased expression of interferon regulated and antiviral response genes in CD31+/CD102+ lung microvascular endothelial cells from systemic sclerosis patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2020. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  77. Di Benedetto, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Liakouli, V.; Cipriani, P.; Giacomelli, R. The vessels contribute to fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2019, 21, 471–474. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hung, C.F.; Wilson, C.L.; Schnapp, L.M. Pericytes in the lung. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1122, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Takakura, N. Role of intimate interactions between endothelial cells and the surrounding accessory cells in the maturation of blood vessels. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 1, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Zhang, Z.S.; Zhou, H.N.; He, S.S.; Xue, M.Y.; Li, T.; Liu, L.M. Research advances in pericyte function and their roles in diseases. Chin. J. Traumatol. 2020, 23, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Greenhalgh, S.N.; Iredale, J.P.; Henderson, N.C. Origins of fibrosis: Pericytes take centre stage. F1000Prime Rep. 2013, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Humphreys, B.D.; Lin, S.L.; Kobayashi, A.; Hudson, T.E.; Nowlin, B.T.; Bonventre, J.V.; Valerius, M.T.; McMahon, A.P.; Duffield, J.S. Fate tracing reveals the pericyte and not epithelial origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, Y.; Gao, F.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Li, C.; Ouyang, Y.; Hou, Y. Valproic acid regulates Ang II-induced pericyte-myofibroblast transdifferentiation via MAPK/ERK pathway. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2018, 10, 1976–1989. [Google Scholar]
  84. Chen, J.; Sivan, U.; Tan, S.L.; Lippo, L.; De Angelis, J.; Labella, R.; Singh, A.; Chatzis, A.; Cheuk, S.; Medhghalchi, M.; et al. High-resolution 3D imaging uncovers organ-specific vascular control of tissue aging. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabd7819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Dulauroy, S.; Di Carlo, S.E.; Langa, F.; Eberl, G.; Peduto, L. Lineage tracing and genetic ablation of ADAM12(+) perivascular cells identify a major source of profibrotic cells during acute tissue injury. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Göritz, C.; Dias, D.O.; Tomilin, N.; Barbacid, M.; Shupliakov, O.; Frisén, J. A pericyte origin of spinal cord scar tissue. Science 2011, 333, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Birbrair, A.; Zhang, T.; Files, D.C.; Mannava, S.; Smith, T.; Wang, Z.M.; Messi, M.L.; Mintz, A.; Delbono, O. Type-1 pericytes accumulate after tissue injury and produce collagen in an organ-dependent manner. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014, 5, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wilson, C.L.; Stephenson, S.E.; Higuero, J.P.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.; Hung, C.F.; Schnapp, L.M. Characterization of human PDGFR-β-positive pericytes from IPF and non-IPF lungs. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2018, 315, L991–L1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rajkumar, V.S.; Howell, K.; Csiszar, K.; Denton, C.P.; Black, C.M.; Abraham, D.J. Shared expression of phenotypic markers in systemic sclerosis indicates a convergence of pericytes and fibroblasts to a myofibroblast lineage in fibrosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005, 7, R1113–R1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hung, C.; Linn, G.; Chow, Y.H.; Kobayashi, A.; Mittelsteadt, K.; Altemeier, W.A.; Gharib, S.A.; Schnapp, L.M.; Duffield, J.S. Role of lung pericytes and resident fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, 820–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Liu, S.; Taghavi, R.; Leask, A. Connective tissue growth factor is induced in bleomycin-induced skin scleroderma. J. Cell. Commun. Signal. 2010, 4, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hung, C.F.; Wilson, C.L.; Chow, Y.H.; Schnapp, L.M. Role of integrin alpha8 in murine model of lung fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Juniantito, V.; Izawa, T.; Yuasa, T.; Ichikawa, C.; Tanaka, M.; Kuwamura, M.; Yamate, J. Immunophenotypical analysis of myofibroblasts and mesenchymal cells in the bleomycin-induced rat scleroderma, with particular reference to their origin. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2013, 65, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cai, X.; Lin, Y.; Friedrich, C.C.; Neville, C.; Pomerantseva, I.; Sundback, C.A.; Zhang, Z.; Vacanti, J.P.; Hauschka, P.V.; Grottkau, B.E. Bone marrow derived pluripotent cells are pericytes which contribute to vascularization. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2009, 5, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ebmeier, S.; Horsley, V. Origin of fibrosing cells in systemic sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2015, 27, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cipriani, P.; Marrelli, A.; Benedetto, P.D.; Liakouli, V.; Carubbi, F.; Ruscitti, P.; Alvaro, S.; Pantano, I.; Campese, A.F.; Grazioli, P.; et al. Scleroderma mesenchymal stem cells display a different phenotype from healthy controls; implications for regenerative medicine. Angiogenesis 2013, 16, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Cipriani, P.; Di Benedetto, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Liakouli, V.; Berardicurti, O.; Carubbi, F.; Ciccia, F.; Guggino, G.; Zazzeroni, F.; Alesse, E.; et al. Perivascular cells in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis overexpress activated ADAM12 and are involved in myofibroblast transdifferentiation and development of fibrosis. J. Rheumatol. 2016, 43, 1340–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hegner, B.; Schaub, T.; Catar, R.; Kusch, A.; Wagner, P.; Essin, K.; Lange, C.; Riemekasten, G.; Dragun, D. Intrinsic deregulation of vascular smooth muscle and myofibroblast differentiation in mesenchymal stromal cells from patients with systemic sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Shi, J.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, A.; Xu, G.; He, F. Metabolism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020, 319, H613–H631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gomez, D.; Owens, G.K. Smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 95, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Allahverdian, S.; Chaabane, C.; Boukais, K.; Francis, G.A.; Bochaton-Piallat, M.L. Smooth muscle cell fate and plasticity in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Grootaert, M.O.J.; Bennett, M.R. Vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis: Time for a reassessment. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sorokin, V.; Vickneson, K.; Kofidis, T.; Woo, C.C.; Lin, X.Y.; Foo, R.; Shanahan, C.M. Role of vascular smooth muscle cell plasticity and interactions in vessel wall inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wirka, R.C.; Wagh, D.; Paik, D.T.; Pjanic, M.; Nguyen, T.; Miller, C.L.; Kundu, R.; Nagao, M.; Coller, J.; Koyano, T.K.; et al. Atheroprotective roles of smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation and the TCF21 disease gene as revealed by single-cell analysis. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1280–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Altorok, N.; Nada, S.; Kahaleh, B. The isolation and characterization of systemic sclerosis vascular smooth muscle cells: Enhanced proliferation and apoptosis resistance. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2016, 1, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Svegliati, S.; Amico, D.; Spadoni, T.; Fischetti, C.; Finke, D.; Moroncini, G.; Paolini, C.; Tonnini, C.; Grieco, A.; Rovinelli, M.; et al. Agonistic anti-PDGF receptor autoantibodies from patients with systemic sclerosis impact human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells function in vitro. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tamama, K.; Sen, C.K.; Wells, A. Differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into the smooth muscle lineage by blocking ERK/MAPK signaling pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhang, X.; Bendeck, M.P.; Simmons, C.A.; Santerre, J.P. Deriving vascular smooth muscle cells from mesenchymal stromal cells: Evolving differentiation strategies and current understanding of their mechanisms. Biomaterials 2017, 145, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yamaguchi, M.; Hirai, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Sumi, T.; Tada, M.; Takahashi, H.; Watanabe, A.; Sakuma, Y. Pericyte-myofibroblast transition in the human lung. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 528, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, N.; Deng, Y.; Liu, A.; Shen, N.; Wang, W.; Du, X.; Tang, Q.; Li, S.; Odeh, Z.; Wu, T.; et al. Novel mechanism of the pericyte-myofibroblast transition in renal interstitial fibrosis: Core fucosylation regulation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wang, Y.C.; Chen, Q.; Luo, J.M.; Nie, J.; Meng, Q.H.; Shuai, W.; Xie, H.; Xia, J.M.; Wang, H. Notch1 promotes the pericyte-myofibroblast transition in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis through the PDGFR/ROCK1 signal pathway. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zent, J.; Guo, L.W. Signaling mechanisms of myofibroblastic activation: Outside-in and inside-out. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 49, 848–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lescoat, A.; Varga, J.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Khanna, D. New promising drugs for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: Pathogenic considerations, enhanced classifications, and personalized medicine. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Campochiaro, C.; Allanore, Y. An update on targeted therapies in systemic sclerosis based on a systematic review from the last 3 years. Arthritis. Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lu, X.; Gong, J.; Dennery, P.A.; Yao, H. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition: Pathogenesis and therapeutic targets for chronic pulmonary and vascular diseases. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 168, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Van Caam, A.; Vonk, M.; van den Hoogen, F.; van Lent, P.; van der Kraan, P. Unraveling SSc pathophysiology; the myofibroblast. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Asano, Y.; Varga, J. Rationally-based therapeutic disease modification in systemic sclerosis: Novel strategies. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2020, 101, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hinchcliff, M.; O’Reilly, S. Current and potential new targets in systemic sclerosis therapy: A new hope. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2020, 22, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Man, S.; Sanchez Duffhues, G.; Ten Dijke, P.; Baker, D. The therapeutic potential of targeting the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Angiogenesis 2019, 22, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rice, L.M.; Padilla, C.M.; McLaughlin, S.R.; Mathes, A.; Ziemek, J.; Goummih, S.; Nakerakanti, S.; York, M.; Farina, G.; Whitfield, M.L.; et al. Fresolimumab treatment decreases biomarkers and improves clinical symptoms in systemic sclerosis patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 2795–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ursini, F.; Grembiale, R.D.; D’Antona, L.; Gallo, E.; D’Angelo, S.; Citraro, R.; Visca, P.; Olivieri, I.; De Sarro, G.; Perrotti, N.; et al. Oral metformin ameliorates bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 1892–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mendoza, F.A.; Piera-Velazquez, S.; Jimenez, S.A. Tyrosine kinases in the pathogenesis of tissue fibrosis in systemic sclerosis and potential therapeutic role of their inhibition. Transl. Res. 2021, 231, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Song, S.; Zhang, M.; Yi, Z.; Zhang, H.; Shen, T.; Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, X.; Yu, L.; Ma, C. The role of PDGF-B/TGF-β1/neprilysin network in regulating endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary artery remodeling. Cell Signal. 2016, 28, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Schermuly, R.T.; Dony, E.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Pullamsetti, S.; Savai, R.; Roth, M.; Sydykov, A.; Lai, Y.J.; Weissmann, N.; Seeger, W. Reversal of experimental pulmonary hypertension by PDGF inhibition. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 2811–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Huang, J.; Beyer, C.; Palumbo-Zerr, K.; Zhang, Y.; Ramming, A.; Distler, A.; Gelse, K.; Distler, O.; Schett, G.; Wollin, L.; et al. Nintedanib inhibits fibroblast activation and ameliorates fibrosis in preclinical models of systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wollin, L.; Maillet, I.; Quesniaux, V.; Holweg, A.; Ryffel, B. Antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib in experimental models of lung fibrosis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 349, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tsutsumi, T.; Nagaoka, T.; Yoshida, T.; Wang, L.; Kuriyama, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Nagata, Y.; Harada, N.; Kodama, Y.; Takahashi, F.; et al. Nintedanib ameliorates experimental pulmonary arterial hypertension via inhibition of endothelial mesenchymal transition and smooth muscle cell proliferation. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wollin, L.; Wex, E.; Pautsch, A.; Schnapp, G.; Hostettler, K.E.; Stowasser, S.; Kolb, M. Mode of action of nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 45, 1434–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Richeldi, L.; du Bois, R.M.; Raghu, G.; Azuma, A.; Brown, K.K.; Costabel, U.; Cottin, V.; Flaherty, K.R.; Hansell, D.M.; Inoue, Y.; et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2071–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Lamb, Y.N. Nintedanib: A review in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Drugs 2021, 81, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mura, M. Use of nintedanib in interstitial lung disease other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Much caution is warranted. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 66, 101987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Piera-Velazquez, S.; Jimenez, S.A. Simultaneous inhibition of c-Abl and Src kinases abro-gates the exaggerated expression of profibrotic genes in cultured systemic sclerosis dermal fibroblasts. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2018, 36, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Wermuth, P.J.; Jimenez, S.A. Abrogation of transforming growth factor-β-induced tissue fibrosis in TBRIcaCol1a2Cretransgenic mice by the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor SKI-606 (Bosutinib). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Li, Z.; Jimenez, S.A. Protein kinase C delta and the c-abl kinase are required for transforming growth factor-beta induction of endothelial-mesenchymal transition in vitro. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gao, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, T.; Shi, W. Rapamycin prevents endothelial cell migration by inhibiting the endothelial-to- mesenchymal transition and matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9: An in vitro study. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 3406–3414. [Google Scholar]
  136. González-Mateo, G.T.; Aguirre, A.R.; Loureiro, J.; Abensur, H.; Sandoval, P.; Sánchez-Tomero, J.A.; del Peso, G.; Jiménez-Heffernan, J.A.; Ruiz-Carpio, V.; Selgas, R. Rapamycin protects from type-I peritoneal membrane failure inhibiting the angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and Endo-MT. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 989560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Yoshizaki, A.; Yanaba, K.; Yoshizaki, A.; Iwata, Y.; Komura, K.; Ogawa, F.; Takenaka, M.; Shimizu, K.; Asano, Y.; Hasegawa, M. Treatment with rapamycin prevents fibrosis in tight-skin and bleomycin induced mouse models of systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 2476–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yoon, K.H. Proliferation signal inhibitors for the treatment of refractory autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A new therapeutic option. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1173, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Su, T.I.; Khanna, D.; Furst, D.E.; Danovitch, G.; Burger, C.; Maranian, P.; Clements, P.J. Rapamycin versus methotrexate in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: Results from a randomized, sin-gle-blind pilot study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 3821–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fried, L.; Kirsner, R.S.; Bhandarkar, S.; Arbiser, J.L. Efficacy of rapamycin in scleroderma: A case study. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2008, 6, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sasaki, N.; Itakura, Y.; Toyoda, M. Rapamycin promotes endothelial-mesenchymal transition during stress-induced premature senescence through the activation of autophagy. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Qi, Q.; Mao, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, K.; Cha, X.; Wu, M.; Zhou, X. Geniposide inhibited endothelial–mesenchymal transition via the mTOR signaling pathway in a bleomycin-induced scleroderma mouse model. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 15, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar]
  143. Jiang, Y.; Hu, F.; Li, Q.; Shen, C.; Yang, J.; Li, M. Tanshinone IIA ameliorates the bleomycin-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in a murine model of systemic sclerosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 77, 105968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Liu, M.; Yang, J.; Li, M. Tanshinone IIA attenuates interleukin-17A-induced systemic sclerosis patient-derived dermal vascular smooth muscle cell activation via inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway. Clinics 2015, 70, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Shi, S.; Srivastava, S.P.; Kanasaki, M.; He, J.; Kitada, M.; Nagai, T.; Nitta, K.; Takagi, S.; Kanasaki, K.; Koya, D. Interactions of DPP-4 and integrin β1 influences endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Kidney Int. 2015, 88, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Soare, A.; Györfi, H.A.; Matei, A.E.; Dees, C.; Rauber, S.; Wohlfahrt, T.; Chen, C.W.; Ludolph, I.; Horch, R.E.; Bäuerle, T.; et al. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 as a marker of activated fibroblasts and a potential target for the treatment of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Yamashita, T.; Asano, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Nakamura, K.; Saigusa, R.; Miura, S.; Toyama, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Yoshizaki, A.; et al. Glycyrrhizin ameliorates fibrosis, vasculopathy, and inflammation in animal models of systemic sclerosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Yamashita, T.; Lakota, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Yoshizaki, A.; Sato, S.; Hong, W.; Zhou, X.; Sodin-Semrl, S.; Fang, F.; Asano, Y.; et al. An orally-active adiponectin receptor agonist mitigates cutaneous fibrosis, inflammation and microvascular pathology in a murine modelof systemic sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yang, R.; Yang, F.; Hu, Y.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhong, W. Hepatocyte growth factor attenuates the development of TGF-β1-induced EndMT through down-regulating the Notch signaling. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2020, 20, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chen, X.; Cai, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, L.; Gong, Y.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Zhou, H. Protective effect of spironolactone on endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in HUVECs via Notch pathway. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 36, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Bianchini, F.; Peppicelli, S.; Fabbrizzi, P.; Biagioni, A.; Mazzanti, B.; Menchi, G.; Calorini, L.; Pupi, A.; Trabocchi, A. Triazole RGD antagonist reverts TGFβ1-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in endothelial precursor cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 424, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Beyer, C.; Distler, J.H. Morphogen pathways in systemic sclerosis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2013, 15, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gyftaki-Venieri, D.A.; Abraham, D.J.; Ponticos, M. Insights into myofibroblasts and their activation in scleroderma: Op-portunities for therapy? Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018, 30, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Cisternas, P.; Vio, C.P.; Inestrosa, N.C. Role of Wnt signaling in tissue fibrosis, lessons from skeletal muscle and kidney. Curr. Mol. Med. 2014, 14, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wild, S.L.; Elghajiji, A.; Grimaldos Rodriguez, C.; Weston, S.D.; Burke, Z.D.; Tosh, D. The canonical Wnt pathway as a key regulator in liver development, differentiation and homeostatic renewal. Genes 2020, 11, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wei, J.; Fang, F.; Lam, A.P.; Sargent, J.L.; Hamburg, E.; Hinchcliff, M.E.; Gottardi, C.J.; Atit, R.; Whitfield, M.L.; Varga, J. Wnt/β-catenin signaling is hyperactivated in systemic sclerosis and induces Smad dependent fibrotic responses in mesen-chymal cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 2734–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Beyer, C.; Reichert, H.; Akan, H.; Mallano, T.; Schramm, A.; Dees, C.; Palumbo-Zerr, K.; Lin, N.Y.; Distler, A.; Gelse, K.; et al. Blockade of canonical Wnt signalling ameliorates experimental dermal fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1255–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Lafyatis, R.; Mantero, J.C.; Gordon, J.; Kishore, N.; Carns, M.; Dittrich, H.; Spiera, R.; Simms, R.W.; Varga, J. Inhibition of β-catenin signaling in the skin rescues cutaneous adipogenesis in systemic sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebocon-trolled trial of C-82. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Zhang, J.; Corciulo, C.; Liu, H.; Wilder, T.; Ito, M.; Cronstein, B. Adenosine A 2a receptor blockade diminishes Wnt/b-catenin signaling in a murine model of bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 1935–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Bergmann, C.; Hallenberger, L.; Chenguiti Fakhouri, S.; Merlevede, B.; Brandt, A.; Dees, C.; Zhu, H.; Zehender, A.; Zhou, X.; Schwab, A.; et al. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) inhibition in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Nandagopal, N.; Santat, L.A.; Elowitz, M.B. Cis-activation in the Notch signaling pathway. eLife 2019, 8, e37880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Condorelli, A.G.; El Hachem, M.; Zambruno, G.; Nystrom, A.; Candi, E.; Castiglia, D. Notch-ing up knowledge on molecular mechanisms of skin fibrosis: Focus on the multifaceted Notch signalling pathway. J. Biomed. Sci. 2021, 28, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Dees, C.; Tomcik, M.; Zerr, P.; Akhmetshina, A.; Horn, A.; Palumbo, K.; Beyer, C.; Zwerina, J.; Distler, O.; Schett, G.; et al. Notch signalling regulates fibroblast activation and collagen release in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 1304–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Kavian, N.; Servettaz, A.; Mongaret, C.; Wang, A.; Nicco, C.; Chéreau, C.; Grange, P.; Vuiblet, V.; Birembaut, P.; Diebold, M.D.; et al. Targeting ADAM-17/notch signaling abrogates the development of systemic sclerosis in a murine model. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 3477–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Dees, C.; Zerr, P.; Tomcik, M.; Beyer, C.; Horn, A.; Akhmetshina, A.; Palumbo, K.; Reich, N.; Zwerina, J.; Sticherling, M.; et al. Inhibition of Notch signaling prevents experimental fibrosis and induces regression of established fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 1396–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tian, D.Y.; Jin, X.R.; Zeng, X.; Wang, Y. Notch signaling in endothelial cells: Is it the therapeutic target for vascular neointimal hyperplasia? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chang, A.C.; Fu, Y.; Garside, V.C.; Niessen, K.; Chang, L.; Fuller, M.; Setiadi, A.; Smrz, J.; Kyle, A.; Minchinton, A.; et al. Notch initiates the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the atrioventricular canal through autocrine activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Dev. Cell. 2011, 21, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Liu, J.; Dong, F.; Jeong, J.; Masuda, T.; Lobe, C.G. Constitutively active Notch1 signaling promotes endothelial mesenchymal transition in a conditional transgenic mouse model. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Tian, D.; Zeng, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Protective effect of rapamycin on endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in HUVECs through the Notch signaling pathway. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2019, 113, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Larsen, L.J.; Møller, L.B. Crosstalk of hedgehog and mTORC1 pathways. Cells 2020, 9, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Skoda, A.M.; Simovic, D.; Karin, V.; Kardum, V.; Vranic, S.; Serman, L. The role of the Hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: A comprehensive review. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2018, 18, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Horn, A.; Kireva, T.; Palumbo-Zerr, K.; Dees, C.; Tomcik, M.; Cordazzo, C.; Zerr, P.; Akhmetshina, A.; Ruat, M.; Distler, O.; et al. Inhibition of hedgehog signalling prevents experimental fibrosis and induces regression of established fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Shah, P.V.; Balani, P.; Lopez, A.R.; Nobleza, C.M.N.; Siddiqui, M.; Khan, S. A review of pirfenidone as an antifibrotic in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and its probable role in other diseases. Cureus 2021, 13, e12482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Didiasova, M.; Singh, R.; Wilhelm, J.; Kwapiszewska, G.; Wujak, L.; Zakrzewicz, D.; Schaefer, L.; Markart, P.; Seeger, W.; Lauth, M.; et al. Pirfenidone exerts antifibrotic effects through inhibition of GLI transcription factors. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 1916–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Xiao, H.; Zhang, G.F.; Liao, X.P.; Li, X.J.; Zhang, J.; Lin, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X. Anti-fibrotic effects of pirfenidone by interference with the hedgehog signalling pathway in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 21, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Conte, E.; Gili, E.; Fagone, E.; Fruciano, M.; Iemmolo, M.; Vancheri, C. Effect of pirfenidone on proliferation, TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation and fibrogenic activity of primary human lung fibroblasts. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 58, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Lehtonen, S.T.; Veijola, A.; Karvonen, H.; Lappi-Blanco, E.; Sormunen, R.; Korpela, S.; Zagai, U.; Sköld, M.C.; Kaarteenaho, R. Pirfenidone and nintedanib modulate properties of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Khanna, D.; Albera, C.; Fischer, A.; Khalidi, N.; Raghu, G.; Chung, L.; Chen, D.; Schiopu, E.; Tagliaferri, M.; Seibold, J.R.; et al. An open-label, phase II study of the safety and tolerability of pirfenidone in patients with scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease: The LOTUSS trial. J. Rheumatol. 2016, 43, 1672–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Distler, A.; Lang, V.; Del Vecchio, T.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Beyer, C.; Lin, N.Y.; Palumbo-Zerr, K.; Distler, O.; Schett, G.; et al. Combined inhibition of morphogen pathways demonstrates additive antifibrotic effects and improved tolerability. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1264–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Piersma, B.; Bank, R.A.; Boersema, M. Signaling in fibrosis: TGF-β, WNT, and YAP/TAZ converge. Front. Med. 2015, 2, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sun, M.; Sun, Y.; Feng, Z.; Kang, X.; Yang, W.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Y. New insights into the Hippo/YAP pathway in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 169, 105635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Toyama, T.; Looney, A.P.; Baker, B.M.; Stawski, L.; Haines, P.; Simms, R.; Szymaniak, A.D.; Varelas, X.; Trojanowska, M. Therapeutic targeting of TAZ and YAP by dimethyl fumarate in systemic sclerosis fibrosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Haak, A.J.; Kostallari, E.; Sicard, D.; Ligresti, G.; Choi, K.M.; Caporarello, N.; Jones, D.L.; Tan, Q.; Meridew, J.; Diaz Espinosa, A.M.; et al. Selective YAP/TAZ inhibition in fibroblasts via dopamine receptor D1 agonism reverses fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Wang, W.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Marangoni, R.G.; Carns, M.; Dennis-Aren, K.; Yeldandi, A.; Wei, J.; Varga, J. The JAK/STAT pathway is activated in systemic sclerosis and is effectively targeted by tofacitinib. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2020, 5, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. You, H.; Xu, D.; Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Tian, X.; Li, M.; Zeng, X. JAK inhibitors: Prospects in connective tissue diseases. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 59, 334–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Roger, I.; Milara, J.; Montero, P.; Cortijo, J. The role of JAK/STAT molecular pathway in vascular remodeling associated with pulmonary hypertension. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chakraborty, D.; Šumová, B.; Mallano, T.; Chen, C.W.; Distler, A.; Bergmann, C.; Ludolph, I.; Horch, R.E.; Gelse, K.; Ramming, A.; et al. Activation of STAT3 integrates common profibrotic pathways to promote fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Pedroza, M.V.; Le, T.T.; Lewis, K.; Karmouty-Quintana, H.; To, S.; George, A.T.; Blackburn, M.R.; Tweardy, D.J.; Agarwal, S.K. STAT-3 contributes to pulmonary fibrosis through epithelial injury and fibroblast myofibroblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2016, 30, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Dees, C.; Tomcik, M.; Palumbo-Zerr, K.; Distler, A.; Beyer, C.; Lang, V.; Horn, A.; Zerr, P.; Zwerina, J.; Gelse, K.; et al. JAK-2 as a novel mediator of the profibrotic effects of transforming growth factor β in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3006–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Papaioannou, I.; Xu, S.; Denton, C.P.; Abraham, D.J.; Ponticos, M. STAT3 controls COL1A2 enhancer activation cooperatively with JunB, regulates type I collagen synthesis post transcriptionally, and is essential for lung myofibroblast differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2018, 29, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. O’Reilly, S.; Ciechomska, M.; Cant, R.; van Laar, J.M. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) trans signaling drives a STAT3-dependent pathway that leads to hyperactive transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling promoting SMAD3 activation and fibrosis via Gremlin protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 9952–9960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Jing, J.; Dou, T.T.; Yang, J.Q.; Chen, X.B.; Cao, H.L.; Min, M.; Cai, S.Q.; Zheng, M.; Man, X.Y. Role of endothelin-1 in the skin fibrosis of systemic sclerosis. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2015, 26, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Wermuth, P.J.; Li, Z.; Mendoza, F.A.; Jimenez, S.A. Stimulation of transforming growth factor- β1-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tissue fibrosis by endothelin-1 (ET-1): A novel profibrotic effect of ET-1. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Soldano, S.; Paolino, S.; Pizzorni, C.; Trombetta, A.C.; Montagna, P.; Brizzolara, R.; Corallo, C.; Giordano, N.; Sulli, A.; Cutolo, M. Dual endothelin receptor antagonists contrast the effects induced by endothelin-1 on cultured human microvascular endothelial cells. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2017, 35, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  195. Makino, K.; Makino, T.; Stawski, L.; Lipson, K.E.; Leask, A.; Trojanowska, M. Anti-connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) monoclonal antibody attenuates skin fibrosis in mice models of systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Haak, A.J.; Tsou, P.S.; Amin, M.A.; Ruth, J.H.; Campbell, P.; Fox, D.A.; Khanna, D.; Larsen, S.D.; Neubig, R.R. Targeting the myofibroblast genetic switch: Inhibitors of myocardin-related transcription factor/serum response factor-regulated gene transcription prevent fibrosis in a murine model of skin injury. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 349, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Kahl, D.J.; Hutchings, K.M.; Lisabeth, E.M.; Haak, A.J.; Leipprandt, J.R.; Dexheimer, T.; Khanna, D.; Tsou, P.S.; Campbell, P.L.; Fox, D.A.; et al. 5-Aryl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthioalkanoic acids: A highly potent new class of inhibitors of rho/myocardin-related transcription factor (mrtf)/serum response factor (srf)-mediated gene transcription as potential antifibrotic agents for scleroderma. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 4350–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Hutchings, K.M.; Lisabeth, E.M.; Rajeswaran, W.; Wilson, M.W.; Sorenson, R.J.; Campbell, P.L.; Ruth, J.H.; Amin, A.; Tsou, P.S.; Leipprandt, J.R.; et al. Pharmacokinetic optimitzation of CCG-203971: Novel inhibitors of the Rho/MRTF/SRF transcriptional pathway as potential antifibrotic therapeutics for systemic scleroderma. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 1744–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Denton, C.P.; Ong, V.H.; Xu, S.; Chen-Harris, H.; Modrusan, Z.; Lafyatis, R.; Khanna, D.; Jahreis, A.; Siegel, J.; Sornasse, T. Therapeutic interleukin-6 blockade reverses transforming growth factor-beta pathway activation in dermal fibroblasts: Insights from the faSScinate clinical trial in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1362–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Khanna, D.; Denton, C.P.; Jahreis, A.; van Laar, J.M.; Frech, T.M.; Anderson, M.E.; Baron, M.; Chung, L.; Fierlbeck, G.; Lakshminarayanan, S.; et al. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in adults with systemic sclerosis (faSScinate): A phase 2, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 2630–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Khanna, D.; Denton, C.P.; Lin, C.J.F.; van Laar, J.M.; Frech, T.M.; Anderson, M.E.; Baron, M.; Chung, L.; Fierlbeck, G.; Lakshminarayanan, S.; et al. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: Results from the open-label period of a phase II randomised controlled trial (faSScinate). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Khanna, D.; Lin, C.J.F.; Furst, D.E.; Goldin, J.; Kim, G.; Kuwana, M.; Allanore, Y.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Distler, O.; Shima, Y.; et al. Tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Mantero, J.C.; Kishore, N.; Ziemek, J.; Stifano, G.; Zammitti, C.; Khanna, D.; Gordon, J.K.; Spiera, R.; Zhang, Y.; Simms, R.W.; et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of IL1-trap, rilonacept, in systemic sclerosis. A phase I/II biomarker trial. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2018, 36, 146–149. [Google Scholar]
  204. Mor, A.; Segal Salto, M.; Katav, A.; Barashi, N.; Edelshtein, V.; Manetti, M.; Levi, Y.; George, J.; Matucci-Cerinic, M. Blockade of CCL24 with a monoclonal antibody ameliorates experimental dermal and pulmonary fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, 1260–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Avouac, J.; Konstantinova, I.; Guignabert, C.; Pezet, S.; Sadoine, J.; Guilbert, T.; Cauvet, A.; Tu, L.; Luccarini, J.M.; Junien, J.L.; et al. Pan-PPAR agonist IVA337 is effective in experimental lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1931–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Ruzehaji, N.; Frantz, C.; Ponsoye, M.; Avouac, J.; Pezet, S.; Guilbert, T.; Luccarini, J.M.; Broqua, P.; Junien, J.L.; Allanore, Y. Pan PPAR agonist IVA337 is effective in prevention and treatment of experimental skin fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 2175–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Toyama, T.; Asano, Y.; Akamata, K.; Noda, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ichimura, Y.; Shudo, K.; Sato, S.; Kadono, T. Tamibarotene ameliorates bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis by modulating phenotypes of fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Tsou, P.S.; Palisoc, P.J.; Flavahan, N.A.; Khanna, D. Dissecting the cellular mechanism of prostacyclin analogue iloprost in reversing vascular dysfunction in scleroderma. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 73, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Yu, M.; Peng, L.; Liu, P.; Yang, M.; Zhou, H.; Ding, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, W.; Tan, Q.; Wang, Y.; et al. Paeoniflorin ameliorates chronic Hypoxia/SU5416-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension by inhibiting endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2020, 14, 1191–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ghofrani, H.A.; Galiè, N.; Grimminger, F.; Grünig, E.; Humbert, M.; Jing, Z.C.; Keogh, A.M.; Langleben, D.; Kilama, M.O.; Fritsch, A.; et al. Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Khanna, D.; Allanore, Y.; Denton, C.P.; Kuwana, M.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Pope, J.E.; Atsumi, T.; Bečvář, R.; Czirják, L.; Hachulla, E.; et al. Riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (RISE-SSc): Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Garcia-Gonzalez, E.; Selvi, E.; Balistreri, E.; Lorenzini, S.; Maggio, R.; Natale, M.R.; Capecchi, P.L.; Lazzerini, P.E.; Bardelli, M.; Laghi-Pasini, F.; et al. Cannabinoids inhibit fibrogenesis in diffuse systemic sclerosis fibroblasts. Rheumatology 2009, 48, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Balistreri, E.; Garcia-Gonzalez, E.; Selvi, E.; Akhmetshina, A.; Palumbo, K.; Lorenzini, S.; Maggio, R.; Lucattelli, M.; Galeazzi, M.; Distler, J.W. The cannabinoid WIN55, 212-2 abrogates dermal fibrosis in scleroderma bleomycin model. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Fu, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Dong, X.; Wang, L.; Jiang, C.G. Activation of cannabinoid receptor type 2 by JWH133 alleviates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 103486–1034898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Spiera, R.; Hummers, L.; Chung, L.; Frech, T.M.; Domsic, R.; Hsu, V.; Furst, D.E.; Gordon, J.; Mayes, M.; Simms, R.; et al. Safety and efficacy of lenabasum in a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 1350–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Di Benedetto, P.; Liakouli, V.; Ruscitti, P.; Berardicurti, O.; Carubbi, F.; Panzera, N.; Di Bartolomeo, S.; Guggino, G.; Ciccia, F.; Triolo, G.; et al. Blocking CD248 molecules in perivascular stromal cells of patients with systemic sclerosis strongly inhibits their differentiation toward myofibroblasts and proliferation: A new potential target for antifibrotic therapy. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.