Next Article in Journal
Gene Expression Meta-Analysis of Cerebellum Samples Supports the FKBP5 Gene-Environment Interaction Model for Schizophrenia
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitogenomics and Evolutionary History of Rodent Whipworms (Trichuris spp.) Originating from Three Biogeographic Regions
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Autophagy in Eye Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Trichuristrichiura from Macaca sylvanus and Papio papio
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Overview of Immunological Responses and Immunomodulation Properties of Trichuris sp.: Prospects for Better Understanding Human Trichuriasis

by
Dewi Masyithah Darlan
1,
Muhammad Fakhrur Rozi
2,* and
Hemma Yulfi
1
1
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(3), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030188
Submission received: 17 November 2020 / Revised: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 February 2021 / Published: 27 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trichuris: Other World, Other Life)

Abstract

:
Trichuris sp. infection has appeared as a pathological burden in the population, but the immunomodulation features could result in an opportunity to discover novel treatments for diseases with prominent inflammatory responses. Regarding the immunological aspects, the innate immune responses against Trichuris sp. are also responsible for determining subsequent immune responses, including the activation of innate lymphoid cell type 2 (ILC2s), and encouraging the immune cell polarization of the resistant host phenotype. Nevertheless, this parasite can establish a supportive niche for worm survival and finally avoid host immune interference. Trichuris sp. could skew antigen recognition and immune cell activation and proliferation through the generation of specific substances, called excretory/secretory (ESPs) and soluble products (SPs), which mainly mediate its immunomodulation properties. Through this review, we elaborate and discuss innate–adaptive immune responses and immunomodulation aspects, as well as the clinical implications for managing inflammatory-based diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, allergic, sepsis, and other autoimmune diseases.

1. Introduction

Trichuris trichiura, or human whipworm, is one of the soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) in the phylum of Nematoda. T. trichiura is grouped similarly with Ascaris lumbricoides, as it involves inseparable risk factors with trichuriasis, but it is phylogenetically distinct [1]. There are more than 70 species in the genus of Trichuris., but only T. trichiura infects humans as the definitive host [2]. The infection is generated through the ingestion of an embryonated egg that has been fully developed following 2–3 weeks of soil contact [3]. It hatches in the proximal part of the large intestine or cecum induced by the microbiota in the large intestine via direct and indirect contact with bacterial type 1 fimbriae found in colonic microbiota, previously known for its mannose-sensitive bacterial adherence to the mucosal surface [4,5].
The first larvae, L1, soon grows to L4, completing the full 3 months of its life cycle. Finally, adult worms create a supportive environment in the intestinal crypt [6]. The adult worm is equipped with a modified anterior region, called the bacillary band, which is mostly constituted by stichocytes and a few bacillary glands and cuticular inflations and invades the gut mucosa with minor damage. A collective of stichocytes, which is known as a schistosome, also acts as a house producer of several secretory products, as discussed in the next section [7]. Meanwhile, an anterior-ventral portion of the bacillary band, called “cuticular inflation,” is hypothetically involved in the active transport for the host–parasite interaction. It comprises many mitochondria but has not yet been fully elucidated [8]. Adult whipworm lives by implanting its anterior portion into gut mucosa and produces 2000–10,000 eggs per day [9], meaning that adult worm observation is possible in fecal samples, but colonoscopy findings could be an alternative [10]. However, the double-knob egg is more practical for trichuriasis diagnosis. Previously, morphometric analysis was used to differentiate eggs in varied hosts and species [11,12].
Nevertheless, the different analyses between species not only relies on the morphological features of the egg and worm, but the recent classification system for whipworm mainly relies on this conventional system and cannot explain the significant stratification among species. Furthermore, several studies have also demonstrated cross-transmission with a challenge from distant phylogenetic variants, including Trichuris sp. Zoonotic transmission includes T. vulpis (dog whipworm) and T. suis (pig whipworm) being discovered in human hosts [13]. Besides this, T suis has also shown identical arrangements with T. trichiura based on phylogenetic analysis. Although morphological differences are disputable, molecularly, it still constitutes different genetic lineages [14,15,16,17,18]. Thus, the extensification for using molecular classification systems is also beneficial for investigating inter-species diversity. Extensification includes the analysis of nuclear internally transcribed spacers (ITS) or mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) in order to determine three main clades among different host species [19,20,21].
Meanwhile, parasite incursion into colonic mucosa induces immune cascade activation to support parasite eradication and expulsion. It is not uncommon that the helminthic species’ complex antigenic structure and its secreted substances appear to be the significant challenge for the immune system, from recognition until eradication. There are still some unanswerable facts, particularly relating to the host-resistant phenotype and the complexity of immune activation against T. trichiura. Nevertheless, the presence of several facts showing that the T. muris (mice whipworms) antigen cross-reacts against human whipworm could boost research on human trichuriasis [22]. In addition, some Trichuris sp. species also bear indistinguishable secreted products with human whipworm, creating a near-identical milieu for the research into human trichuriasis [23,24,25,26].
Based on a prior study, it is notable that Trichuris sp. modulates the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa environment, causing it to be less hostile for worm development and survival. However, abundant types of immune cells and specialized structures produce a unique interaction after the first invasion occurs [27,28]. These immunomodulation mechanisms transform the immune system, locally and systemically, in combination to support the livelihood of whipworm. Excretory-secretory (ESPs) and soluble products (SPs) are responsible for immunomodulation features, comprising several protein based-substances and miRNA [29]. It is predicted that dozens of ESPs and SPs are secreted throughout the infection process, but only a few have certain functions. Based on genomic analysis, it was found that more than 50% of T. muris protein is homologous with the mammalian origin of exosomes. Gene ontology (GO) terms regarding the molecular function are mostly categorized into binding, catalytic activity, and structural molecule activity. At the same time, three major GO terms in the biological process refer to cellular, metabolic, and single organism processes, confirming the role of secreted products in modulating the immune process. A total of 14 ESPs containing miRNA candidates and 73 proteins have been extracted from T. muris [30]. In addition, ESPs and SPs could also transform gut microbiota and increase the susceptibility to bacterial invasion during chronic infection with Trichuris sp. [31].
In this work, we present a scientific investigation into the uncharted pathogenesis and immune response against trichuriasis. The discussion explores the role of immune cells in the early development of infection, antigenic recognition, the involvement of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), and undisputed pro-worm expulsion cytokine surges. However, immune response against trichuriasis is still unsuccessful in most infected hosts. Understanding the immunomodulation properties of Trichuris sp. is another key area of discussion in this review. This will open the horizons into managing other diseases that involve surges of proinflammatory cytokines. Nevertheless, there are still major issues relating to human trichuriasis that are not discussed here. For instance, the lower potency of anti-helminthic drugs against Trichuris sp., which presents a challenge for the efficacy of mass drug administration (MDA) programs and therefore the discovery of putative vaccines and drugs based on host–parasite and immune interactions with the help of several advances in technology, including X-ray computed tomography (CT), for examining morphological features [32].

2. Basic Immunology Concept against Trichuris trichiura

Trichuris sp. induces a cascade of immunological responses characterized by hyper-IgE and eosinophil or humoral-mediated responses in the human large intestine [33,34,35]. However, several incomplete pictures relating to the immune response against whipworm and other helminth infections have been presented. Besides, the host–parasite interaction could be confounded by several factors that contribute to the complex immunity process against the parasite, including the presence of additional parasite non-self-antigens, ESPs and SPs, infection burden, T helper polarization, antibody responses, host microbiota changes, and bacterial translocation [31,35,36,37,38,39].
Several factors affecting the immune response are also orchestrated locally and systematically during infection, which were represented through a study using peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). PBL played a role as a marker for the immunologic response in mesenteric lymph nodes against T. trichiura, and ultimately secreted higher levels of type 2 cytokines, including interleukin (IL-4), IL-5, IL-9, and low levels of interferon gamma (IFNϒ) secretion obtained via peripheral blood samples [40]. In another study, trickle infection appeared as a transforming factor of immunological direction. This mode of infection also modulated the immune response during the experimental study more predominantly with Th1-type cytokine. In contrast, a high burden of infection at a single time prevents a large degree of Th1-type cytokine expression, and it is concurrent with a significant change in the resistant phenotype [41,42,43].
In the subsection below, the basic concept of the immunological response against Trichuris is discussed regarding the fate of worm expulsion with a potent Th2 response versus chronic infection dominated by Th1-type cytokine expression.

2.1. Innate Immune System Also Determines the Fate of Infection

A recent review explored the substantial role of the GI epithelium as the first structural barrier against pathogens, as it maintains the homeostasis with the work of mucus, intestinal microbiomes, and functional innate immune cell content [44]. Besides this, the gut microbiome, symptomatic diarrhea, and pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-like receptors, nucleotide-binding domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), or C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), contribute to the immune response to Trichuris infection [45]. As a result, this generates a hostile environment for Trichuris development and proliferation if effective anti-helminthic immunity is formulated.
Intestinal epithelial cells have been notably enrolled in the immune response against intestinal bacterial and parasitic infection by inundating the gut environment with Th2-type cytokine during the initial phase of infection [23,44,46]. Previous studies have shown that colonic epithelial cells and mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNCs) secrete high levels of interferon (IFN) ϒ with a low expression of Th2 cytokines produced both in resistant and susceptible laboratory-infected mice, suggesting a multistage process for immune activation [47,48].
The involvement of GI tissue in secreting cytokines against parasitic invasion was also evident in another study provoking IL1, IL6, IFNϒ, and TNFα mRNA expression [49]. Consequently, Th1 cytokine expression then upregulates and shifts to Th2-type cytokine for the resistant state of infection. However, immunity timelines against Trichuris have not been entirely delineated, since strong Th2 immune responses alone could trigger worm expulsion without B cell involvement [50]. Still, a mixed response (Th1/Th2) requires B cells to effectively expedite expulsion in an IFNϒ-rich environment, denoting the involvement of B cells in amplifying Th2 polarization [37,51]. Moreover, local intestinal antigen-presenting cells (APCs) could produce retinoic acid for IL10 production and TGFβ—a cytokine hallmark for priming Th2-type phenotypic responses [52].
Classical findings associated with immune activation in Trichuris sp. infection have delineated innate and adaptive immune systems as different processes, but recent studies have shown otherwise. The interaction between the two parts of the immune response is responsible for the successful fate of parasite eradication, as it is shown in Figure 1. IL4, IL5, and IL-13 authenticate the activation of Th2 immune response, and these proinflammatory cytokines surge prior to Th2 activation. Intestinal epithelial cells and innate immune cells can upregulate Th2 cytokines via thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-25, and IL-33 secretion, which are potent inducers for Th2 cytokine expression [53,54,55,56]. Therefore, the innate cellular component could also determine the reactivity and the quality of adaptive immune responses, which could result in a failure during antigenic recognition or cellular induction that consequently reverberates to the priming and proliferation of the adaptive immune system.
In the end, the complex framework between innate and adaptive immune response is a continuation of different immune activation and regulation processes. The amalgamation of functions among immune cells is responsible for leading to worm expulsion by increasing intestinal epithelial cell turnover and mucin secretion. Specifically, IL-4 induce smucin production from enterocytes while IL-13 triggers goblet cell hyperplasia. Both cytokines promote smooth muscle contraction, which ultimately expedites worm expulsion, but cytokine activities might also be independent of the adaptive immune responses [57,58].

2.2. Antibody-Dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC): Is It Reliable for Trichuriasis?

In another perspective, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) has become an alternative route to eradicate whipworm due to the inability of phagocytic cells to ingest macropathogens [29,59]. The definition of ADCC refers to the immune killing method through the opsonization of antigens using antibodies mediated by cross-linked Fc receptors found in effector cells, such as macrophages, natural killer cells (NK cells), neutrophils, and eosinophils [29]. IgG, IgA, or IgE coat antigens and activate the complement system to finalize the cytotoxic response. In the end, effector cells release granules and lysosomal content and form an identical immunopathology with a “granulomatous appearance” in certain parasitic infections implicated by ADCC, which is highly dependent on sensitized CD4+ T lymphocytes [60,61].
It has long been documented that cytotoxicity represents the essential immune response against Trichuris sp. infection, but the role of antibodies has also been notable in some studies. Moreover, some reports have concluded that the role of one of the cytotoxic cell effectors, eosinophil, has been disputed in terms of its protective function during ADCC and its intrinsic function during infection [62,63,64]. The study demonstrated that the worm expulsion or resistance state also continued in the absence of eosinophil and mast cells, while other immune cell subsets affected the regulation [64]. Nevertheless, ADCC might still occur as an innate immune response against helminth larvae, but it could be an inefficient way to generate adult worm expulsion [65].

2.3. Adaptive Immune Response: Worm Expulsion versus Chronic Infection

The investigation of the adaptive immune response against T. trichiura is incomplete, and several hypotheses and deviant responses have also been proposed during the infection. Early studies divided the terms of “responders,” referring to mice that achieved worm expulsion, and “non-responders,” referring to mice with no immune response against Trichuris sp., resulting in chronic infection [66]. Nevertheless, recent studies have disputed the terms because there is still significant immunity established following infection in both groups but inadequate responses among non-responders. Therefore, “resistant” and “susceptible” have been proposed to reflect immune reactivity against Trichuris sp. infection. In other words, resistant mice will generate a predominantly Th2-type response, resulting in worm expulsion [67].
Susceptible hosts experience chronic infection and Th1 polarization that is ineffective and even increases immunopathological abnormality [23]. Many studies have supported the fact that Th2-type response predominance against T. trichiura quickly results in worm expulsion [36,41,42,47,48,68]. A study discovered that Schistosoma mansoni coinfection with T. muris caused spontaneous infection resolution [69]. This resistant host phenotype relied on Th2-associated cytokine and antibody isotypes previously produced by the antigenic exposure to the S. mansoni egg.

3. Innate Lymphoid Cells: A Paucity Not to Be Ignored

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are a part of the innate immune system and contribute to several crucial steps bolstering the immune system against Trichuris sp. infection. ILCs arise as the preliminary immune response before the initiation phase of APCs by antigenic exposure to T lymphocytes via the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) II-mediated pathway. Several conditions have notably accelerated the effects of ILCs without the involvement of adaptive immunity [70,71]. ILCs do not express specific lineage markers, as usually demonstrated in other myeloid and lymphoid lineage cells, and comprise two major groups based on the expression of specific transcription factors (TFs), cytotoxic cells (NK cells) and cytotoxic cytokines (ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3 with IL-7Ra+ expression). NK cells and ILC1 are associated with type-1 immune response against an intracellular pathogen, while ILC2, similar to the Th2-type response, acts during parasitic infection, allergic reactions, and tissue remodeling, producing IL-3, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, as well as amphiregulin [68].
The identification methods of ILC2s are also defined in the literature, as they are tissue-resident cells [72]. ILC2s are not identifiable with other innate immune cells, but they share similarities with common lymphoid-origin cells by carrying CD45, a common leukocyte antigen. The ILC2 subset has distinct TFs, including a transcription factor of the GATA family, GATA3 [73], which is essential for humoral mediated immunity by Th2 response. However, early ILC2 development and activation also depend on this TF in addition to others, such as BCL11b, RORalfa, and GFi1 [68]. Meanwhile, ILC2 also bears several biologic markers, such as chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2), MHCII, CD127, CD80, IL-17RB, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST-2), and amphiregulin. ILC2 also has two different subsets, natural ILC2 (nILC2) and inflammatory ILC2 (iILC2), with iILC2 demonstrating proliferative activity during helminth infection [74]. ILC2 also loads a high burden of IL-17RB and killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1), a C-type lectin-like inhibitory receptor with E-cadherin as a ligand which is mostly expressed in NK cells and essential for cell transmigration [74,75].
Innate lymphoid cells 2 (ILC2s) integrate with the adaptive immune system to deliver worm expulsion. During their first handling, antigen recognition hypothetically occurs as the first part of immune triggering for ILC2. Other lymphoid and myeloid lineage cells are involved in the adaptive immune response utilized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) or non-self-peptides bound to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) for antigenic recognition, but whether or not this stage also applies during ILC2 first antigenic exposure is still questionable. The bridging of the communication between ILC2s and T helpers ensues with the presence of MHC II-bound ILC2s to exert a type-2 cytokine response against helminth [76]. Nevertheless, three main alarmins (IL25, IL33, and TSLP) secreted from the surrounding environment contribute to ILC2 activation and proliferation following Trichuris infection [77,78,79]. Both IL25 and TSLP are secreted by the intestinal epithelial cells, but a specialized epithelial cell called a tuft cell is more abundantly secreted in IL25 production [77,80]. IL33 is another alarmin that is upregulated by the ATP release from necrotic epithelial cells, inducing local mast cells to release IL33. All three alarmins induce IL5, IL13, and amphiregulin as the signature of type-2 immunity against Trichuris sp. infection.
In addition, IL25 and IL33 are also secreted by ILC2s, mediating the fibrosis pattern in pulmonary fibrosis and raising questions regarding the stenosis inducer subset of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [81]. Nevertheless, the profibrotic effect of ILC2s is disputed by the fact that ILC2-deficient mice failed to attenuate colitis and fibrosis and had a slower recovery rate compared to ILC2-positive mice with IL13 surges [82]. The presence of cytokine type-2 secreted by ILC2 and TF related to the humoral immune response supports the hypothesis regarding the role of this cell for effective Trichuris expulsion.

4. Immunomodulation Properties of Trichuris sp. and Clinical Implications: Focus on the Role of Excretory/Secretory (ESPs) and Soluble Products (SPs)

Drawing the theoretical background regarding how helminths, particularly Trichuris sp., produce chronic infection is not a simple task. During this period, helminth infection deliberately invades the gastrointestinal mucosa and produces a supportive niche for its sustainability. Nevertheless, the infection process only triggers a subtle inflammatory response, frequently flawed Th2 response, or a predominant Th1 immune response. The latest investigation demonstrated one of the remarkable features of Trichuris sp.—that it could transform the immune response into favorable states through the secretion of excretory/secretory products (ESPs)—as we elaborate in the following discussion.
ESPs are a group of molecules released from helminths, bearing immunomodulation features during the host–parasite interaction consisting of some uncharacterized substances, proteases, glycolytic enzymes, protease inhibitors, chaperones, miRNA, and antigen homologs or metabolites [30,83,84]. Whipworms organize the substances for survival and modulate the immune response through two primary mechanisms. First, ESPs can manipulate the expression of PRRs or act as cytokine homologs, affecting downstream signaling pathways [85]. Second, immunomodulation features can also trigger several changes in the response to the regulation and polarization of immune cells that could blunt inflammatory responses via anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion, such as IL10 and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ). In a study, the direct effect of the presence of ESPs reduced IL-1β, TNF-α, and NO-2 as secreted products of macrophages in the large intestine [31]. However, whey acidic protein (WAP), as an abundant type of EPs found in T. muris, induces induce type-2 immunity that eventually promotes worm expulsion [86].

4.1. Secreted Products Modulate Pattern Recognition Receptor (PRR)

ESPs impair the function of PRR, which is an essential part of the innate immune response for antigen recognition. There are several types of PRRs, such as retinoic-acid inducible gene (RIG)-like receptors (RLRs), NLRs, CLRs, and toll-like receptors (TLRs), contained by future antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). By modulating the activation of PRRs, the ESPs of T. suis were shown to prevent lipopolysaccharide-induced TLR4 sensing in human dendritic cells (DCs) in a study, suppressing downstream signaling pathways [87]. It was also evident that T. suis SPs transform macrophages into a more anti-inflammatory phenotype by inhibiting P2RX7, a receptor involved in the stimulation of immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes, concurrent with reduced IL12B, CCL1, and CXCL9 expression [88]. This interaction reduced the expression of proinflammatory cytokines via Rab7b overexpression, a small GTPase-degrading TLR4 [89,90]. Both pathways related to TLR4 for myeloid differentiation would undoubtedly also be impaired. Reductions mainly involve MyD88-dependent mediated TLR4 responses, finally reducing the level of proinflammatory cytokine genes, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and eicosanoids [89]. ESPs also affected the remaining TLR4 signaling pathway in a TIR-domain-containing adaptor protein-inducing, interferon-β (TRIF)-dependent manner, by reducing IFN α/β production, finally resulting in the scarcity of expression of type I IFNs [91]. Retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG)-I-like receptors also disintegrate following ESP administration, downregulating several essential signaling proteins such as lrf7, Ddx60, and Dhx58 [92]. Thus, there is a decreased downstream signaling for proinflammatory cytokines, and the threats for type-I IFN production become more prominent [93].
Impairing TLR4 activation prevents the surge of proinflammatory cytokine secretion, which eventually results in several clinical implications for other conditions. In sepsis, the hyperactivation of TLR4 and TLR2 is concurrent with the overload of systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction and could produce poor outcomes in animal models [94]. Trichuris infection prevents TLR4 activation by downgrading its receptor and signaling pathway, thus reducing the repercussions of proinflammatory cytokine upregulation [88]. Additionally, the immunomodulation properties of Trichuris could also increase insulin sensitivity [95]. Dietary fatty acids and enteric lipopolysaccharides (LPS) can activate TLR4 and provoke proinflammatory responses to behave as insulin resistance inducers [96,97]. Therefore, preventing TLR4 signal activation could be the novel target to increase insulin sensitivity.
Glycan-based components in Trichuris sp. SPs bind the mannose receptor, a CLR, and increase its expression in monocytes and dendritic cells, inducing protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation, specifically PKC δ, and shift the monocyte behavior to an anti-inflammatory phenotype [98,99]. Most novel PKC activation implications remain unknown, but CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 2 and lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA) 1 expression are upregulated following PKC activation [100,101]. In IBD, a disease characterized by gut physiology resembling T. muris infection, breaking mucosal integrity becomes the basis of pathogenesis, which is perpetually insulted by the expression of proinflammatory cytokine and oxidants caused by the PKC downstream signaling pathway [102]. Moreover, PKC inhibitors were found to attenuate tissue injury in a mice model for colitis [103]. The same study also suggested a breakthrough in advancing qualities for managing several autoimmune diseases with T cells and the autoreactivity of monocyte-derived macrophages using Trichuris sp.-secreted products, such as multiple sclerosis and IBD [98].
Cytosolic PRR or the inflammasome have demonstrated several pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [85]. The presence of ESPs and other extracellular vesicles released from Trichuris also affects the function of NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), a well-known inflammasome that has pivotal roles during the initiation and amplification phases of both the innate and adaptive immune response [104]. Trichuris exosomes encourage pro-helminthic immunity by upregulating IL1β and IL18 via the NLRP3-dependent pathway [104,105]. IL18 appears to be a driving force for the different outcomes since it has a diverse function that could initiate a resistant or susceptible type of immune response. IL18 used to be known as IFNϒ-inducing factor (IGIF) and is involved in the vast signaling pathway for Th1 and NK cell activation, but in vivo studies have suggested that IL18 undermines anti-helminth immunity through an IFNϒ-independent pathway. In other studies, NLRP3 activation triggered downstream signaling pathways of the Th1-type response, making the host susceptible to chronic infection [104]. In contrast, infecting NLRP3-deficient mice with helminths augmented early innate immune cell recruitment, eosinophilia, and neutrophilia, as well as type-2 cytokine responses, while the presence of NLRP3 attenuated immunopathological changes in the tissue environment [106].

4.2. Secreted Product Skewed Innate Immune System

Trichuris ESPs and SPs have also become key to developing the innate immune system by shifting the response of classical (inflammatory type) into nonclassical monocytes after Trichuris SPs administration. This type of monocyte has no expression of CCR2 and CD14 but has a higher expression of CX3CR1. A group of proinflammatory cytokines (a marker of classical monocytes), including IL-10, TGFβ, TNFα, IL-6, and ROS, was first secreted during early observation. However, transition occurred following 16 h of SPs treatment with prominent anti-inflammatory cytokine expression, showing that classical monocytes were largely impacted by the presence of SPs [98].
Monocyte hypermotility, mediated by the activity of small Rho GTPases such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 on the actin cytoskeleton, was also notable and reduced adhesion to endothelial cells following Trichuris ESPs treatment [98]. A high-saturated prostaglandin E2 content of EPs and SPs also manipulated dendritic cells by skewing proinflammatory features by upregulating RAB7B [90]. PGE2 synthesis by T. suis was independent of cyclooxygenase activity in the study. SPs modulate DCs through a mechanism that predominantly involves the overexpression of PGE2, although its effect differs based on its concentration and bound receptors [84]. This could resolve inflammation to accommodate immunopathological repair. However, the glycan component of SPs was also found to interact with CLRs in human DC, with the final result of modulating DCs to suppress proinflammatory responses, but this is a concentration-related effect.

4.3. Secreted Product Produce Deviant Cytokine Response

ESPs influence proinflammatory cytokine expression. However, higher levels of IL10 and other regulatory cytokines, TGFβ and IL-35, are associated with the administration of Trichuris ESPs. This also suggests that this cytokine concoction yields the main immunomodulation properties of ESPs. The regulatory function of IL10 cannot be described solely as pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines because of the pleiotropic features caused by heterogeneous receptors IL10Rα, IL10Rβ, IL22Rα, and IL28Rα with diverse implications. Nevertheless, IL10 still augments the Th2-type immune response against acute Trichuris infection via IL10Rα activation [107]. It also plays a vital role in protecting the intestinal barriers, preventing other bacterial invasions, and constraining the systemic inflammatory response against Trichuris infection. Conversely, several significant findings regarding tissue rupture are caused by Trichuris invasion promoting bacterial translocation through the lesion. In two separate studies, the response of T.suis inoculation was clearly found to lead to macro-pathological changes associated with bacterial infiltration and the suppression of local immunity to the Trichuris sp. site of infection [31,108].
In contrast, it was observed that Alzheimer’s transgenic mice infected with Trichuris were more vulnerable to suffer from exacerbations caused by neuroinflammation and larger microglia size, suggesting that a systemic response also developed during overwhelming IL10 secretion [109]. Nevertheless, IL10 upregulation following ESP treatment showed positive implications in other pathological conditions, including IBD. IL10-deficient mice developed chronic inflammation, resulting in the significant immunopathology caused by an incessant immune response against normal intestinal flora [110]. Meanwhile, the reduction of airway responsiveness and IgE production dependent on IL10 was also evident in the mice model for allergic disease, showing the immunoregulatory function of IL10 [111]. Concerning this evidence, ESPs ultimately reduces the inflammatory response and its immunopathology by promoting IL10 secretion.
The administration of ESPs also thwarts Th2 immune cell polarization via the direct activity of ESPs modulating IL4 and IL13 expression, which are useful in different pathways for Th2 immune maintenance [112,113]. This recent finding shows that the protein component of ESPs secreted during chronic T. muris infection, called p43, acts as a homolog for IL13 receptor α2 (IL13Rα2) and thrombospondin type 1 [113]. This protein binds into the IL13 active site, inhibiting downstream activation, thus resulting in susceptibility and failed worm expulsion. In predominant eosinophilic diseases, IL13 plays a crucial role in eosinophil priming and proliferation, causing more damage to the tissue environment. Since ESP mimics IL13Rα2, it could halt the vicious pathological changes mediated by IL13 activity, such as airway hyperresponsiveness and goblet cell proliferation, as well as mucus secretion. Therefore, it might be beneficial for asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

5. Conclusions

The Th2-type cytokine mainly plays pivotal roles in alleviating the burden of a worm and thus its expulsion. Nevertheless, innate and adaptive immune responses are evidently connected as the reasons for the success of worm expulsion. The roles of the innate immune system are demonstrated by ILC2s that could provoke Th2-type responses before the involvement of adaptive immune responses. Furthermore, ESPs and SPs mediate major Trichuris immunomodulation properties and could support pro-helminthic immunity. However, the scientific investigation of this feature has brought several experimental breakthroughs in the clinical resolution of several autoimmune, allergic, and other chronic immunoreactive diseases. Further research is necessary to confirm its effects in the general population.

Author Contributions

M.F.R. preparing original draft and writing the manuscript; D.M.D. and H.Y. writing, reviewing, and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garcia, L.S. Classification of Human Parasites, Vectors, and Similar Organisms. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 29, 734–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Horton, J. Helminth-Nematode: Trichuris trichiura. Encycl. Food Saf. 2014, 2, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bharti, B.; Bharti, S.; Khurana, S. Worm infestation: Diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Indian J. Pediatr. 2018, 85, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vejzagic, N.; Adelfio, R.; Keiser, J.; Kringel, H.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Kapel, C.M. Bacteria-induced egg hatching differs for Trichuris muris and Trichuris suis. Parasit Vectors 2015, 8, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Koyama, K. Bacteria-induced hatching of Trichuris muris eggs occurs without direct contact between eggs and bacteria. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Beer, R. Studies on the biology of the life-cycle of Trichuris suis Schrank, 1788. Parasitology 1973, 67, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sheffield, H.G. Electron microscopy of the bacillary band and stichosome of Trichuris muris and T. vulpis. J. Parasitol. 1963, 49, 998–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. O’Sullivan, J.D.; Cruickshank, S.M.; Starborg, T.; Withers, P.J.; Else, K.J. Characterisation of cuticular inflation development and ultrastructure in Trichuris muris using correlative X-ray computed tomography and electron microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Viswanath, A.; Yarrarapu, S.N.S.; Williams, M. Trichuris Trichiura. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507843/ (accessed on 15 November 2020).
  10. Sunkara, T.; Sharma, S.R.; Ofosu, A. Trichuris trichiura—An Unwelcome Surprise during Colonoscopy. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 99, 555–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. García-Sánchez, A.M.; Reguera-Gomez, M.; Valero, M.A.; Cutillas, C. Differentiation of Trichuris species eggs from non-human primates by geometric morphometric analysis. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 12, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. World Health Organization. Bench Aids for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasites; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Betson, M.; Soe, M.J.; Nejsum, P. Human Trichuriasis: Whipworm Genetics, Phylogeny, Transmission and Future Research Directions. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2015, 2, 209–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Beer, R.J.S. The relationship between Trichuris trichiura (Linnaeus 1758) of man and Trichuris suis (Schrank 1788) of the pig. Res. Vet. Sci. 1976, 20, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cutillas, C.; Callejon, R.; de Rojas, M.; Tewes, B.; Ubeda, J.M.; Ariza, C.; Guevara, D.C. Trichuris suis and Trichuris trichiura are different nematode species. Acta Trop. 2009, 111, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meekums, H.; Hawash, M.B.; Sparks, A.M.; Oviedo, Y.; Sandoval, C.; Chico, M.E.; Stothard, J.R.; Cooper, P.J.; Nejsum, P.; Betson, M. A genetic analysis of Trichuris trichiura and Trichuris suis from Ecuador. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Nissen, S.; Al-Jubury, A.; Hansen, T.V.; Olsen, A.; Christensen, H.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Nejsum, P. Genetic analysis of Trichuris suis and Trichuris trichiura recovered from humans and pigs in a sympatric setting in Uganda. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 188, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rivero, J.; García-Sánchez, Á.M.; Zurita, A.; Cutillas, C.; Callejón, R. Trichuris trichiura isolated from Macaca sylvanus: Morphological, biometrical, and molecular study. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Phosuk, I.; Sanpool, O.; Thanchomnang, T.; Sadaow, L.; Rodpai, R.; Anamnart, W.; Janwan, P.; Wijit, A.; Laymanivong, S.; Pa Aung, W.P.; et al. Molecular Identification of Trichuris suis and Trichuris trichiura Eggs in Human Populations from Thailand, Lao PDR, and Myanmar. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Guardone, L.; Deplazes, P.; Macchioni, F.; Magi, M.; Mathis, A. Ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA analysis of Trichuridae nematodes of carnivores and small mammals. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Callejón, R.; Halajian, A.; De Rojas, M.; Marrugal, A.; Guevara, D.; Cutillas, C. 16S partial gene mitochondrial DNA and internal transcribed spacers ribosomal DNA as differential markers of Trichuris discolor populations. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roach, T.; Wakelin, D.; Else, K.; Bundy, D. Antigenic cross-reactivity between the human whipworm, Trichuris trichiura, and the mouse trichuroids Trichuris muris and Trichinella spiralis. Parasite Immunol. 1988, 10, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Klementowicz, J.E.; Travis, M.A.; Grencis, R.K. Trichuris muris: A model of gastrointestinal parasite infection. In Seminars in Immunopathology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 815–828. [Google Scholar]
  24. Eichenberger, R.M.; Talukder, M.H.; Field, M.A.; Wangchuk, P.; Giacomin, P.; Loukas, A.; Sotillo, J. Characterization of Trichuris muris secreted proteins and extracellular vesicles provides new insights into host-parasite communication. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1428004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Leroux, L.P.; Nasr, M.; Valanparambil, R.; Tam, M.; Rosa, B.A.; Siciliani, E.; Hill, D.E.; Zarlenga, D.S.; Jaramillo, M.; Weinstock, J.V.; et al. Analysis of the Trichuris suis excretory/secretory proteins as a function of life cycle stage and their immunomodulatory properties. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lillywhite, J.; Cooper, E.; Needham, C.; Venugopal, S.; Bundy, D.; Bianco, A. Identification and characterization of excreted/secreted products of Trichuris trichiura. Parasite Immunol. 1995, 17, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leonardi, I.; Gerstgrasser, A.; Schmidt, T.S.; Nicholls, F.; Tewes, B.; Greinwald, R.; von Mering, C.; Rogler, G.; Frey-Wagner, I. Preventive Trichuris suis ova (TSO) treatment protects immunocompetent rabbits from DSS colitis but may be detrimental under conditions of immunosuppression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dige, A.; Rasmussen, T.K.; Nejsum, P.; Hagemann-Madsen, R.; Williams, A.R.; Agnholt, J.; Dahlerup, J.F.; Hvas, C.L. Mucosal and systemic immune modulation by Trichuris trichiura in a self-infected individual. Parasite Immunol. 2017, 39, e12394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Motran, C.C.; Silvane, L.; Chiapello, L.S.; Theumer, M.G.; Ambrosio, L.F.; Volpini, X.; Celias, D.P.; Cervi, L. Helminth infections: Recognition and Modulation of the immune Response by innate immune Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tritten, L.; Tam, M.; Vargas, M.; Jardim, A.; Stevenson, M.M.; Keiser, J.; Geary, T.G. Excretory/secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris. Exp. Parasitol. 2017, 178, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schachter, J.; de Oliveira, D.A.; da Silva, C.M.; de Barros Alencar, A.C.M.; Duarte, M.; da Silva, M.M.P.; Ignácio, A.C.d.P.R.; Lopes-Torres, E.J. Whipworm Infection Promotes Bacterial Invasion, Intestinal Microbiota Imbalance, and Cellular Immunomodulation. Infect. Immun. 2020, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Else, K.J.; Keiser, J.; Holland, C.V.; Grencis, R.K.; Sattelle, D.B.; Fujiwara, R.T.; Bueno, L.L.; Asaolu, S.O.; Sowemimo, O.A.; Cooper, P.J. Whipworm and roundworm infections. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. King, C.; Low, C.; Nutman, T. IgE production in human helminth infection. Reciprocal interrelationship between IL-4 and IFN-gamma. J. Immunol. 1993, 150, 1873–1880. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Belhassen-García, M.; Pardo-Lledías, J.; del Villar, L.P.; Muro, A.; Velasco-Tirado, V.; de Castro, A.B.; Vicente, B.; García, M.I.G.; Bellido, J.L.M.; Cordero-Sánchez, M. Relevance of eosinophilia and hyper-IgE in immigrant children. Medicine 2014, 93, e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lillywhite, J.; Bundy, D.; Didier, J.; Cooper, E.; Bianco, A. Humoral immune responses in human infection with the whipworm Trichuris trichiura. Parasite Immunol. 1991, 13, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Else, K.; Entwistle, G.; Grencis, R. Correlations between worm burden and markers of Th1 and Th2 cell subset induction in an inbred strain of mouse infected with Trichuris muris. Parasite Immunol. 1993, 15, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Blackwell, N.M.; Else, K.J. B cells and antibodies are required for resistance to the parasitic gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 3860–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Houlden, A.; Hayes, K.S.; Bancroft, A.J.; Worthington, J.J.; Wang, P.; Grencis, R.K.; Roberts, I.S. Chronic Trichuris muris infection in C57BL/6 mice causes significant changes in host microbiota and metabolome: Effects reversed by pathogen clearance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Holm, J.B.; Sorobetea, D.; Kiilerich, P.; Ramayo-Caldas, Y.; Estellé, J.; Ma, T.; Madsen, L.; Kristiansen, K.; Svensson-Frej, M. Chronic Trichuris muris infection decreases diversity of the intestinal microbiota and concomitantly increases the abundance of lactobacilli. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Taylor, M.D.; Betts, C.J.; Else, K.J. Peripheral cytokine responses to Trichuris muris reflect those occurring locally at the site of infection. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 1815–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bancroft, A.J.; Else, K.J.; Humphreys, N.E.; Grencis, R.K. The effect of challenge and trickle Trichuris muris infections on the polarisation of the immune response. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001, 31, 1627–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Glover, M.; Colombo, S.A.; Thornton, D.J.; Grencis, R.K. Trickle infection and immunity to Trichuris muris. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kringel, H.; Iburg, T.; Dawson, H.; Aasted, B.; Roepstorff, A. A time course study of immunological responses in Trichuris suis infected pigs demonstrates induction of a local type 2 response associated with worm burden. Int. J. Parasitol. 2006, 36, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Coackley, G.; Harris, N.L. The Intestinal Epithelium at the Forefront of Host–Helminth Interactions. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ogra, P.L.; Mestecky, J.; Lamm, M.E.; Strober, W.; McGhee, J.R.; Bienenstock, J. Handbook of Mucosal Immunology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cortés, A.; Muñoz-Antoli, C.; Toledo, R.; Esteban, J.G. Th2 and Th1 Responses: Clear and Hidden Sides of Immunity Against Intestinal Helminths. Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Deschoolmeester, M.L.; Manku, H.; Else, K.J. The innate immune responses of colonic epithelial cells to Trichuris muris are similar in mouse strains that develop a type 1 or type 2 adaptive immune response. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 6280–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bellaby, T.; Robinson, K.; Wakelin, D. Induction of differential T-helper-cell responses in mice infected with variants of the parasitic nematode Trichuris muris. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Stadnyk, A.W.; Kearsey, J.A. Pattern of proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression during Trichinella spiralis infection of the rat. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 5138–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ludwig-Portugall, I.; Layland, L.E. TLRs, Treg, and B celss, an interplay of regulation during helminth infection. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Sahputra, R.; Else, K.J.; Rückerl, D.; Couper, K.; Müller, W. The essential role played by B cells in supporting protective immunity against Trichuris muris infection is by controlling the Th1/Th2 balance in the mesenteric lymph nodes and depends on host genetic background. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sanders, T.J.; McCarthy, N.E.; Giles, E.M.; Davidson, K.L.; Haltalli, M.L.; Hazell, S.; Lindsay, J.O.; Stagg, A.J. Increased production of retinoic acid by intestinal macrophages contributes to their inflammatory phenotype in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1278–1288.e1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fort, M.M.; Cheung, J.; Yen, D.; Li, J.; Zurawski, S.M.; Lo, S.; Menon, S.; Clifford, T.; Hunte, B.; Lesley, R. IL-25 induces IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and Th2-associated pathologies in vivo. Immunity 2001, 15, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Jang, S.; Morris, S.; Lukacs, N.W. TSLP promotes induction of Th2 differentiation but is not necessary during established allergen-induced pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kitajima, M.; Lee, H.C.; Nakayama, T.; Ziegler, S.F. TSLP enhances the function of helper type 2 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 1862–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Murakami-Satsutani, N.; Ito, T.; Nakanishi, T.; Inagaki, N.; Tanaka, A.; Vien, P.T.X.; Kibata, K.; Inaba, M.; Nomura, S. IL-33 promotes the induction and maintenance of Th2 immune responses by enhancing the function of OX40 ligand. Allergol. Int. 2014, 63, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Marillier, R.G.; Michels, C.; Smith, E.M.; Fick, L.C.; Leeto, M.; Dewals, B.; Horsnell, W.G.; Brombacher, F. IL-4/IL-13 independent goblet cell hyperplasia in experimental helminth infections. BMC Immunol. 2008, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sharba, S.; Navabi, N.; Padra, M.; Persson, J.; Quintana-Hayashi, M.; Gustafsson, J.; Szeponik, L.; Venkatakrishnan, V.; Sjöling, Å.; Nilsson, S. Interleukin 4 induces rapid mucin transport, increases mucus thickness and quality and decreases colitis and Citrobacter rodentium in contact with epithelial cells. Virulence 2019, 10, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Capron, A.; Dessaint, J.-P.; Haque, A.; Capron, M. Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity against Parasites. Immun. Concomitant Immun. Infect. Dis. 1982, 31, 234–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tang, H.; Ming, Z.; Liu, R.; Xiong, T.; Grevelding, C.G.; Dong, H.; Jiang, M. Development of adult worms and granulomatous pathology are collectively regulated by T-and B-cells in mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54432. [Google Scholar]
  61. Matsuda, S.; Tani, Y.; Yamada, M.; Yoshimura, K.; Arizono, N. Type 2-biased expression of cytokine genes in lung granulomatous lesions induced by Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection. Parasite Immunol. 2001, 23, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Behm, C.A.; Ovington, K.S. The Role of Eosinophils in Parasitic Helminth Infections: Insights from Genetically Modified Mice. Parasitol. Today 2000, 16, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Klion, A.D.; Nutman, T.B. The role of eosinophils in host defense against helminth parasites. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 113, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. BETTS, C.J.; ELSE, K.J. Mast cells, eosinophils and antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity are not critical in resistance to Trichuris muris. Parasite Immunol. 1999, 21, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yasuda, K.; Kuroda, E. Role of eosinophils in protective immunity against secondary nematode infections. Immunol. Med. 2019, 42, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hurst, R.J.; Else, K.J. Trichuris muris research revisited: A journey through time. Parasitology 2013, 140, 1325–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wakelin, D. Acquired immunity to Trichuris muris in the albino laboratory mouse. Parasitology 1967, 57, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mirchandani, A.S.; Besnard, A.G.; Yip, E.; Scott, C.; Bain, C.C.; Cerovic, V.; Salmond, R.J.; Liew, F.Y. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells drive CD4+ Th2 cell responses. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 2442–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Curry, A.; Else, K.; Jones, F.; Bancroft, A.; Grencis, R.; Dunne, D. Evidence that cytokine-mediated immune interactions induced by Schistosoma mansoni alter disease outcome in mice concurrently infected with Trichuris muris. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 181, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chang, Y.J.; Kim, H.Y.; Albacker, L.A.; Baumgarth, N.; McKenzie, A.N.; Smith, D.E.; Dekruyff, R.H.; Umetsu, D.T. Innate lymphoid cells mediate influenza-induced airway hyper-reactivity independently of adaptive immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Kim, H.Y.; Chang, Y.J.; Subramanian, S.; Lee, H.H.; Albacker, L.A.; Matangkasombut, P.; Savage, P.B.; McKenzie, A.N.; Smith, D.E.; Rottman, J.B.; et al. Innate lymphoid cells responding to IL-33 mediate airway hyperreactivity independently of adaptive immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 129, 216–227.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Duerr, C.U.; Fritz, J.H. Isolation of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells from Mouse Lungs. In Innate Antiviral Immunity; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2017; Volume 1656, pp. 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mjosberg, J.; Bernink, J.; Golebski, K.; Karrich, J.J.; Peters, C.P.; Blom, B.; te Velde, A.A.; Fokkens, W.J.; van Drunen, C.M.; Spits, H. The transcription factor GATA3 is essential for the function of human type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 2012, 37, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Huang, Y.; Guo, L.; Qiu, J.; Chen, X.; Hu-Li, J.; Siebenlist, U.; Williamson, P.R.; Urban, J.F.; Paul, W.E. IL-25-responsive, lineage-negative KLRG1 hi cells are multipotential ‘inflammatory’type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nakamura, S.; Kuroki, K.; Ohki, I.; Sasaki, K.; Kajikawa, M.; Maruyama, T.; Ito, M.; Kameda, Y.; Ikura, M.; Yamamoto, K. Molecular basis for E-cadherin recognition by killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1). J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 27327–27335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Oliphant, C.J.; Hwang, Y.Y.; Walker, J.A.; Salimi, M.; Wong, S.H.; Brewer, J.M.; Englezakis, A.; Barlow, J.L.; Hams, E.; Scanlon, S.T.; et al. MHCII-mediated dialog between group 2 innate lymphoid cells and CD4(+) T cells potentiates type 2 immunity and promotes parasitic helminth expulsion. Immunity 2014, 41, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Han, M.; Rajput, C.; Hong, J.Y.; Lei, J.; Hinde, J.L.; Wu, Q.; Bentley, J.K.; Hershenson, M.B. The Innate Cytokines IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP Cooperate in the Induction of Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Expansion and Mucous Metaplasia in Rhinovirus-Infected Immature Mice. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 1308–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hong, J.Y.; Bentley, J.K.; Chung, Y.; Lei, J.; Steenrod, J.M.; Chen, Q.; Sajjan, U.S.; Hershenson, M.B. Neonatal rhinovirus induces mucous metaplasia and airways hyperresponsiveness through IL-25 and type 2 innate lymphoid cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Toki, S.; Goleniewska, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, W.; Newcomb, D.C.; Zhou, B.; Kita, H.; Boyd, K.L.; Peebles, R.S., Jr. TSLP and IL-33 reciprocally promote each other’s lung protein expression and ILC2 receptor expression to enhance innate type-2 airway inflammation. Allergy 2020, 75, 1606–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Von Moltke, J.; Ji, M.; Liang, H.E.; Locksley, R.M. Tuft-cell-derived IL-25 regulates an intestinal ILC2-epithelial response circuit. Nature 2016, 529, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hams, E.; Armstrong, M.E.; Barlow, J.L.; Saunders, S.P.; Schwartz, C.; Cooke, G.; Fahy, R.J.; Crotty, T.B.; Hirani, N.; Flynn, R.J.; et al. IL-25 and type 2 innate lymphoid cells induce pulmonary fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Creyns, B.; Cremer, J.; De Hertogh, G.; Boon, L.; Ferrante, M.; Vermeire, S.; Van Assche, G.; Ceuppens, J.L.; Breynaert, C. Fibrogenesis in chronic murine colitis is independent of innate lymphoid cells. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2020, 8, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lightowlers, M.W.; Rickard, M.D. Excretory-secretory products helminth parasite: Effects on host immune responses. Parasitology 1988, 96, S123–S166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hewitson, J.P.; Grainger, J.R.; Maizels, R.M. Helminth immunoregulation: The role of parasite secreted proteins in modulating host immunity. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2009, 167, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Maizels, R.M.; Smits, H.H.; McSorley, H.J. Modulation of Host Immunity by Helminths: The Expanding Repertoire of Parasite Effector Molecules. Immunity 2018, 49, 801–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Briggs, N.; Wei, J.; Versteeg, L.; Zhan, B.; Keegan, B.; Damania, A.; Pollet, J.; Hayes, K.S.; Beaumier, C.; Seid, C.A. Trichuris muris whey acidic protein induces type 2 protective immunity against whipworm. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Summan, A.; Nejsum, P.; Williams, A.R. Modulation of human dendritic cell activity by Giardia and helminth antigens. Parasite Immunol. 2018, 40, e12525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ottow, M.; Klaver, E.; van der Pouw Kraan, T.; Heijnen, P.; Laan, L.; Kringel, H.; Vogel, D.; Dijkstra, C.; Kooij, G.; Van Die, I. The helminth Trichuris suis suppresses TLR4-induced inflammatory responses in human macrophages. Genes Immun. 2014, 15, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Klaver, E.; van der Pouw Kraan, T.; Laan, L.; Kringel, H.; Cummings, R.; Bouma, G.; Kraal, G.; Van Die, I. Trichuris suis soluble products induce Rab7b expression and limit TLR4 responses in human dendritic cells. Genes Immun. 2015, 16, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Laan, L.C.; Williams, A.R.; Stavenhagen, K.; Giera, M.; Kooij, G.; Vlasakov, I.; Kalay, H.; Kringel, H.; Nejsum, P.; Thamsborg, S.M. The whipworm (Trichuris suis) secretes prostaglandin E2 to suppress proinflammatory properties in human dendritic cells. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Harnett, W. Secretory products of helminth parasites as immunomodulators. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2014, 195, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rehwinkel, J.; Gack, M.U. RIG-I-like receptors: Their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Duque-Correa, M.A.; Schreiber, F.; Rodgers, F.H.; Goulding, D.; Forrest, S.; White, R.; Buck, A.; Grencis, R.K.; Berriman, M. Development of caecaloids to study host-pathogen interactions: New insights into immunoregulatory functions of Trichuris muris extracellular vesicles in the caecum. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Krivan, S.; Kapelouzou, A.; Vagio, S.; Tsilimigras, D.I.; Katsimpoulas, M.; Moris, D.; Aravanis, C.V.; Demesticha, T.D.; Schizas, D.; Mavroidis, M.; et al. Increased expression of Toll-like receptors 2, 3, 4 and 7 mRNA in the kidney and intestine of a septic mouse model. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Wiria, A.E.; Hamid, F.; Wammes, L.J.; Prasetyani, M.A.; Dekkers, O.M.; May, L.; Kaisar, M.M.; Verweij, J.J.; Guigas, B.; Partono, F. Infection with soil-transmitted helminths is associated with increased insulin sensitivity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127746. [Google Scholar]
  96. Rocha, D.; Caldas, A.; Oliveira, L.; Bressan, J.; Hermsdorff, H. Saturated fatty acids trigger TLR4-mediated inflammatory response. Atherosclerosis 2016, 244, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qi, X.; Qin, L.; Du, R.; Chen, Y.; Lei, M.; Deng, M.; Wang, J. Lipopolysaccharide upregulated intestinal epithelial cell expression of Fn14 and activation of Fn14 signaling amplify intestinal TLR4-mediated inflammation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kooij, G.; Braster, R.; Koning, J.J.; Laan, L.C.; van Vliet, S.J.; Los, T.; Eveleens, A.M.; van der Pol, S.M.; Förster-Waldl, E.; Boztug, K. Trichuris suis induces human non-classical patrolling monocytes via the mannose receptor and PKC: Implications for multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2015, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Klaver, E.J.; Kuijk, L.M.; Laan, L.C.; Kringel, H.; van Vliet, S.J.; Bouma, G.; Cummings, R.D.; Kraal, G.; van Die, I. Trichuris suis-induced modulation of human dendritic cell function is glycan-mediated. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bono, M.a.R.; Elgueta, R.l.; Sauma, D.; Pino, K.; Osorio, F.; Michea, P.; Fierro, A.; Rosemblatt, M. The essential role of chemokines in the selective regulation of lymphocyte homing. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2007, 18, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Laufer, J.M.; Legler, D.F. Beyond migration—Chemokines in lymphocyte priming, differentiation, and modulating effector functions. J. Leucoc. Biol. 2018, 104, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Yang, L.; Yan, Y. Protein kinases are potential targets to treat inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 5, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Brown, J.F.; Chang, Q.; Soper, B.D.; Tepperman, B.L. Protein kinase C mediates experimental colitis in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, G583–G590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alhallaf, R.; Agha, Z.; Miller, C.M.; Robertson, A.A.; Sotillo, J.; Croese, J.; Cooper, M.A.; Masters, S.L.; Kupz, A.; Smith, N.C. The NLRP3 inflammasome suppresses protective immunity to gastrointestinal helminth infection. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 1085–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Zaiss, M.M.; Maslowski, K.M.; Mosconi, I.; Guenat, N.; Marsland, B.J.; Harris, N.L. IL-1β suppresses innate IL-25 and IL-33 production and maintains helminth chronicity. PLoS Pathog 2013, 9, e1003531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Chenery, A.L.; Alhallaf, R.; Agha, Z.; Ajendra, J.; Parkinson, J.E.; Cooper, M.M.; Chan, B.H.; Eichenberger, R.M.; Dent, L.A.; Robertson, A.A. Inflammasome-independent role for NLRP3 in controlling innate antihelminth immunity and tissue repair in the lung. J. Immunol. 2019, 203, 2724–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Duque-Correa, M.A.; Karp, N.A.; McCarthy, C.; Forman, S.; Goulding, D.; Sankaranarayanan, G.; Jenkins, T.P.; Reid, A.J.; Cambridge, E.L.; Reviriego, C.B. Exclusive dependence of IL-10Rα signalling on intestinal microbiota homeostasis and control of whipworm infection. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Mansfield, L.; Urban Jr, J. The pathogenesis of necrotic proliferative colitis in swine is linked to whipworm induced suppression of mucosal immunity to resident bacteria. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Montacute, R.; Foley, K.; Forman, R.; Else, K.J.; Cruickshank, S.M.; Allan, S.M. Enhanced susceptibility of triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease (3xTg-AD) mice to acute infection. J. Neuroinflammation 2017, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Kühn, R.; Löhler, J.; Rennick, D.; Rajewsky, K.; Müller, W. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 1993, 75, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ebner, F.; Hepworth, M.; Rausch, S.; Janek, K.; Niewienda, A.; Kühl, A.; Henklein, P.; Lucius, R.; Hamelmann, E.; Hartmann, S. Therapeutic potential of larval excretory/secretory proteins of the pig whipworm Trichuris suis in allergic disease. Allergy 2014, 69, 1489–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Bancroft, A.J.; McKenzie, A.N.; Grencis, R.K. A critical role for IL-13 in resistance to intestinal nematode infection. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 3453–3461. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Bancroft, A.J.; Levy, C.W.; Jowitt, T.A.; Hayes, K.S.; Thompson, S.; Mckenzie, E.A.; Ball, M.D.; Dubaissi, E.; France, A.P.; Bellina, B. The major secreted protein of the whipworm parasite tethers to matrix and inhibits interleukin-13 function. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The fate of the immunological response against Trichuris sp. infection. There are two critical factors associated with the successful worm expulsion: The host inflammatory genotype and infection burden. The innate immune response must mount Th2-type cytokines.
Figure 1. The fate of the immunological response against Trichuris sp. infection. There are two critical factors associated with the successful worm expulsion: The host inflammatory genotype and infection burden. The innate immune response must mount Th2-type cytokines.
Life 11 00188 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Darlan, D.M.; Rozi, M.F.; Yulfi, H. Overview of Immunological Responses and Immunomodulation Properties of Trichuris sp.: Prospects for Better Understanding Human Trichuriasis. Life 2021, 11, 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030188

AMA Style

Darlan DM, Rozi MF, Yulfi H. Overview of Immunological Responses and Immunomodulation Properties of Trichuris sp.: Prospects for Better Understanding Human Trichuriasis. Life. 2021; 11(3):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Darlan, Dewi Masyithah, Muhammad Fakhrur Rozi, and Hemma Yulfi. 2021. "Overview of Immunological Responses and Immunomodulation Properties of Trichuris sp.: Prospects for Better Understanding Human Trichuriasis" Life 11, no. 3: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop