Next Article in Journal
Analytical Modeling of Slot Leakage Inductance for Hairpin Windings
Previous Article in Journal
Friction and Wear Behavior of General Freight Train Composite Brake Shoes with Reinforced Steel Fibers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Features of the Data Collection and Transmission Technology in an Intelligent Thermal Conditioning System for Engines and Vehicles Operating on Thermal Energy Storage Technology Based on a Digital Twin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Operators and Mambas in Detecting and Quantifying Electrical Machine Faults: A Case Study on Eccentricity

by
Latifa Yusuf
*,
Belaid Moa
and
Ilamparithi Thirumarai Chelvan
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Machines 2026, 14(5), 574; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14050574
Submission received: 29 March 2026 / Revised: 15 May 2026 / Accepted: 16 May 2026 / Published: 21 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis for Machines and Systems, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Reliable fault detection and quantification are essential for the operational integrity of electric machines. While traditional current-based analysis relies on harmonic signatures or wavelet-based time-frequency representations, this study investigates modern learning formulations that capture spectral, multiscale, and temporal characteristics of fault-affected signals. Moving beyond conventional models, including our earlier CNN-based approaches, we develop sequence-based and operator-learning architectures within a multi-output formulation for eccentricity fault analysis. Three models are investigated: Mamba for temporal dynamics, the Fourier Neural Operator for global spectral mapping, and the Wavelet Neural Operator for localized multiscale decomposition. Evaluated on induction, salient pole synchronous, and inverter-based reluctance synchronous machines, each model maps stator current waveforms to multiple diagnostic quantities, including voltages, operating conditions, and fault severity. With time-delay embedding, all three achieve low prediction errors, with severity RMSE reaching the 104 scale for the induction machine, a notable reduction from the 0.04 errors of our earlier hierarchical CNN models. These results show that modern sequence-based and operator-learning formulations can broaden machine fault analysis by enabling simultaneous prediction and estimation of multiple aspects of machine condition within a single model.
Keywords: condition monitoring; eccentricity; electrical machines; fault detection; fault severity estimation; Mamba; neural operator; multi-output prediction condition monitoring; eccentricity; electrical machines; fault detection; fault severity estimation; Mamba; neural operator; multi-output prediction

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yusuf, L.; Moa, B.; Thirumarai Chelvan, I. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Operators and Mambas in Detecting and Quantifying Electrical Machine Faults: A Case Study on Eccentricity. Machines 2026, 14, 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14050574

AMA Style

Yusuf L, Moa B, Thirumarai Chelvan I. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Operators and Mambas in Detecting and Quantifying Electrical Machine Faults: A Case Study on Eccentricity. Machines. 2026; 14(5):574. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14050574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yusuf, Latifa, Belaid Moa, and Ilamparithi Thirumarai Chelvan. 2026. "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Operators and Mambas in Detecting and Quantifying Electrical Machine Faults: A Case Study on Eccentricity" Machines 14, no. 5: 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14050574

APA Style

Yusuf, L., Moa, B., & Thirumarai Chelvan, I. (2026). The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Operators and Mambas in Detecting and Quantifying Electrical Machine Faults: A Case Study on Eccentricity. Machines, 14(5), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14050574

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop