Next Article in Journal
A Predictive Maintenance System Design and Implementation for Intelligent Manufacturing
Next Article in Special Issue
Load Distribution and Dynamic Response in Torque Split Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Fatigue Evaluation of Bogie Frames on Metro Trains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vibration Propagation Characteristics of Micro-Milling Tools
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Machines
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/machines10111005
Review Report
machines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New Modeling Approach for Parameter Design of Stewart Vibration Isolation System Integrated into Complex Systems

Machines 2022, 10(11), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10111005
by Tianqing Zhang 1,2, Xiaoxue Gong 3, Lei Zhang 1,2,3,* and Yang Yu 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Seok Moon
Machines 2022, 10(11), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10111005
Submission received: 23 July 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vibration and Acoustic Analysis of Components and Machines)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is very well written. However, some polishing is needed for improved readability.  Reference related to steward dynamics can be added to make the literature survey exhaustive. 

Quality of some figures is low. May be replaced with new one. 

Some symbols are not defined. Equation numbers are not properly defined. For eq, e9 defined twice.

In eq 9, page 14, authors show damping the dynamical equation of the system but its effects never discussed in the results. Authors are encouraged to compare the response of the system with and without damping. 

Author Response

    Sincerely invite you to review my paper again. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me,  I will reply to you seriously. Thank you for your patience and kindness.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall, the engineering contribution of this paper cannot be confirmed.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for reviewing my manuscript again, and if you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me as soon as possible.

Please see the response in the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The author's response to the first review is checked. Thank you for your sincere reply. The added review opinions are summarized as follows.

1. The description of "equivalent parameter modeling method" is insufficient in this paper. It is judged that the key is to model 6 spring-damping struts as one elastic node. In order to provide a sufficient explanation to the reader, it is necessary to show the reality of the finally produced elastic node.

2. Please present the final equation of motion modeled with one elastic node.

3. Some variables are still undefined. There are also examples of using the same variable differently. Please check it in its entirety and correct it.

4. Chapter 3 presents the results compared with FEM. A logical technique is required so that the presented method can highlight its superior advantages compared to FEM. I don't know what the meaning of the method presented for passive, not active, SVIP is.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your review，Specific responses are detailed in the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop