Next Article in Journal
Effect of Heat/Mass Transfer and Magnetic Field on Peristaltic Flow of Rabinowitsch Fluid Through a Symmetric Inclined Channel with Thermal Radiation
Previous Article in Journal
The Double-Slit Experiment in the Bivector Standard Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Wijsman fρ-Statistical Convergence of Order α of Modulus Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Essential Norm of Generalized Integral-Type Operator from the Fractional Cauchy Transform Space into Weighted Bloch and Dirichlet Spaces

by
Mostafa Hassanlou
1,*,
Ebrahim Abbasi
2,* and
Maryam G. Alshehri
3
1
Engineering Faculty of Khoy, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 57166, Iran
2
Department of Mathematics, Mah. C., Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran
3
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, P.O. Box 741, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2026, 15(6), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms15060418
Submission received: 7 April 2026 / Revised: 1 June 2026 / Accepted: 2 June 2026 / Published: 4 June 2026

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the generalized integral-type operator acting between the fractional Cauchy transform space and two classical analytic function spaces: the weighted Bloch space and the weighted Dirichlet space. For the operator acting into the weighted Bloch space, we obtain two equivalent exact formulas for its operator norm. Furthermore, an estimate for its essential norm is provided, which leads to a necessary and sufficient condition for compactness. For the operator acting into the weighted Dirichlet space, we derive the exact operator norm and fully characterize its compactness.

1. Introduction

Let D be the open unit disk in C and H ( D ) be the set of analytic functions on D . Here, we use some subspaces of H ( D ) , which are known in the literature. If a function f is analytic in D , then the Cauchy formula gives
f ( z ) = 1 2 π i T f ( ξ ) ξ z d ξ , z D ,
where T = { z C : | z | = 1 } . The above representation extends to more general functions belonging to the fractional Cauchy transform space. For α > 0 , a function f belongs to the space of fractional Cauchy transforms F α if it has a representation as
f ( z ) = T 1 ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α d μ ( ξ ) , z D ,
for some μ M , the space of all complex-valued Borel measures on T with the total variation norm. The representation (1) is a special case for α = 1 and d μ ( ξ ) = f ( ξ ) 2 π i d ξ . The family of fractional Cauchy transforms F α has been studied extensively; two standard references are [1,2]. The space F α is a vector space with respect to the ordinary addition of functions and multiplication by complex numbers. The statement
f F α = inf μ μ
defines a norm on F α , which is a Banach space with this norm. Here, infimum is taken over measures in M for which (2) holds and μ is the total variation of μ . It can be shown that for every f F α , there is a μ M , such that (2) holds and f F α = μ .
Now, we define weighted Bloch and Dirichlet spaces. Suppose that ω is a weight function on D , i.e., a positive continuous function on D . The weighted Bloch space B ω is the space of all analytic functions in D for which
f B ω = | f ( 0 ) | + sup z D ω ( z ) | f ( z ) | < .
The space B ω is a Banach space equipped with the above norm. For ω ( z ) = ( 1 | z | 2 ) α , α > 0 , we obtain the Bloch-type space B α . See [3] for a more complete understanding of these spaces. For a radial weight ω , ω ( | z | ) = ω ( z ) , the weighted Dirichlet space D ω is defined as follows:
D ω = { f H ( D ) : D | f ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < } .
Here, d A is the normalized area measure on D ,   D d A ( z ) = 1 . The norm on the space D ω is
f D ω = | f ( 0 ) | + D | f ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 / 2 .
The classical Dirichlet space D is a special case of this space for ω 1 .
Let φ S ( D ) , which is the space of all analytic self-maps of D . The composition operator induced by φ is denoted by C φ and is defined by
C φ f = f φ f H ( D ) .
The above operator can be generalized using an integral called a generalized integral type operator C φ , g n or a generalized integration operator. For g H ( D ) , n N 0 = { 0 , 1 , } , and φ S ( D ) , the generalized integral-type operator is defined as follows:
C φ , g n f ( z ) = 0 z f ( n ) ( φ ( ζ ) ) g ( ζ ) d ζ , f H ( D ) , z D .
If n = 1 , then C φ , g n = C φ g . This kind of operator also includes integral and Volterra operators. The generalized integration operator between the Bloch type space and weighted Dirichlet type spaces was investigated in [4]. For studies on composition operators on the space of fractional Cauchy transforms, see [5,6]. For differences in composition operators and differentiation composition operators on fractional Cauchy transforms spaces, one can refer to [7,8]. The boundedness, essential norm, and compactness of generalized Stević–Sharma-type operators on spaces of fractional Cauchy transforms have been characterized in [9]. For additional studies on this type of operator or other generalization of composition operators on spaces of analytic function spaces, especially the spaces we consider here, see [10,11]. To the best of our knowledge, the operator C φ , g n on F α has not been systematically studied before. The main novelties of this paper are the following: (i) exact norm formulas for both target spaces, (ii) an essential norm estimate (equivalence) for the Bloch case, and (iii) a compactness criterion for the Dirichlet case.
In this paper, we compute or estimate two features of C φ , g n as a linear operator, norm, and essential norm. First, we find two formulas for the norm of C φ , g n : F α B ω , and as an application, the bounded operators are characterized. Then, an estimate for the essential norm is proved. Finally, we find the norm of the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω and characterize its compactness.
For a bounded linear operator T : X Y between two Banach spaces, the essential norm T e is the distance from T to the space of all compact operators from X into Y. This means that
T e = inf { T K : K : X Y is compact } .
Therefore, the operator T is compact if and only if T e = 0 .
In this work, if there exists a constant C such that A C B , we say that A B . The symbol A B means that A B A .

2. Norm and Essential Norm of C φ , g n : F α B ω

In this section, we obtain two exact formulas for the norm of the generalized integral-type operator from the Cauchy transform space into a weighted Bloch space. We also find an estimate for the essential norm of the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω . As a result, we present equivalence conditions for the compactness of such operators. First, we state the following estimate of | f ( n ) ( z ) | for functions in F α :
Lemma 1.
If f F α and n N 0 , then
| f ( n ) ( z ) | C f F α ( 1 | z | 2 ) α + n , z D
where C is a positive constant independent of f.
Proof. 
Since f F α , there exists a μ M such that
f ( z ) = T 1 ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α d μ ( ξ ) .
Taking the derivative of the above equation, we have
f ( n ) ( z ) = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α + n d μ ( ξ ) .
Thus,
| f ( n ) ( z ) | C T d | μ | ( ξ ) | 1 ξ ¯ z | α + n C T d | μ | ( ξ ) ( 1 | z | 2 ) α + n = C μ ( 1 | z | 2 ) α + n .
Taking the infimum over all measures in M , inequality (3) is obtained.   □
In the following theorem, we obtain the first formula for the norm of the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω .
Theorem 1.
Let n N 0 , α > 0 , ω be a weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) . Then,
C φ , g n F α B ω = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α .
Proof. 
For any ξ T , let f ξ ( z ) = 1 ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α . Then, f ξ F α , f ξ F α = 1 , and
f ξ ( k ) ( z ) = ξ ¯ k l = 0 k 1 ( α + l ) ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α + k ,
where k N [12]. The definition of the norm of the operator implies that
C φ , g n F α B ω   C φ , g n ( f ξ ) B ω = | C φ , g n ( f ξ ) ( 0 ) | + sup z D ω ( z ) | ( C φ , g n f ξ ) ( z ) |
Since C φ , g n ( f ξ ) ( 0 ) = 0 and ( C φ , g n f ξ ) ( z ) = g ( z ) f ξ ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) , we obtain
C φ , g n ( f ξ ) B ω = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup z D · ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α .
Taking the supremum over ξ T gives
C φ , g n F α B ω l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α .
Conversely, for any f F α , there exists ν M such that ν = f F α and
f ( z ) = T d ν ( ξ ) ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α ;
see [12]. Moreover,
f ( n ) ( z ) = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) n + α d ν ( ξ ) .
Hence, for any f F α , we have
C φ , g n f B ω =   | ( C φ , g n f ) ( 0 ) | + sup z D ω ( z ) | ( C φ , g n f ) ( z ) | = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) ) n + α d ν ( ξ ) l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | T 1 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) ) | n + α d | ν | ( ξ ) l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α T d | ν | ( ξ ) l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α ν = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α f F α = sup ξ T sup z D l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α f F α .
Considering the above discussion with regard to inequality (5) yields (4).   □
In the next theorem, we find another formula for the norm of the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω .
Theorem 2.
Let n N 0 , α > 0 , ω be a weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) . Then,
C φ , g n F α B ω = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | ) n + α .
Proof. 
For any w D , there exists 0 θ w < 2 π such that φ ( w ) = e i θ w | φ ( w ) | . Thus, for any w D , using the previous theorem, we have
C φ , g n F α B ω = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T ω ( w ) | g ( w ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( w ) | n + α l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) ω ( w ) | g ( w ) | | 1 e i θ w ¯ φ ( w ) | n + α = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) ω ( w ) | g ( w ) | | 1 e i θ w ¯ e i θ w | φ ( w ) | | n + α = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) ω ( w ) | g ( w ) | ( 1 | φ ( w ) | ) n + α .
By taking the supremum on w, we obtain
C φ , g n F α B ω l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup w D ω ( w ) | g ( w ) | ( 1 | φ ( w ) | ) n + α
Also, by Theorem 1, we have
C φ , g n F α B ω = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | ) n + α .
The proof is complete.   □
From Theorem 1 and 2, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
Let n N 0 , α > 0 , ω be a weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) . Then, the following statements are equivalent:
1. 
The operator C φ , g n : F α B ω is bounded.
2. 
sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | ) n + α < .
3. 
sup ξ T sup z D ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | n + α < .
In the following theorem, we obtain an estimate for the essential norm of the generalized integral-type operator from the Cauchy transform space into a weighted Bloch space.
Theorem 3.
Let n N 0 , α > 0 , ω be a weight, g H ( D ) and φ S ( D ) . If C φ , g n : F α B ω is bounded, then
C φ , g n ϵ lim sup | φ ( z ) | 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n .
Proof. 
It is clear that when φ = sup z D | φ ( z ) | < 1 , then the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω is compact and both sides of the desired equality are zero. Hence, we assume φ = 1 . Choose z k D such that lim k φ z k = 1 . Consider the functions { f k } ,
f k , φ ( z k ) ( z ) = ( 1 | φ ( z k ) | 2 ) α ( 1 φ ( z k ) ¯ z ) α + k .
Then, { f k , φ ( z k ) } is a bounded sequence in F α that converges to zero uniformly on compact subsets of D (see [12]). Thus, using Lemma 2.10 of [13] for any compact operator T : F α B ω , we get
C φ , g n T lim sup k ( C φ , g n T ) f k , φ ( z k ) B ω lim sup k ( C φ , g n f k , φ ( z k ) B ω T f k , φ ( z k ) B ω ) = lim sup k C φ , g n f k , φ ( z k ) B ω = lim sup k sup z D ω ( z ) | ( C φ , g n ( f k , φ ( z k ) ) ) z | lim sup k ω ( z k ) | ( C φ , g n ( f k , φ ( z k ) ) ) z k | = lim sup k ω ( z k ) | f k , φ ( z k ) ( n ) ( φ ( z k ) ) | | g ( z k ) | = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) lim sup k ω ( z k ) | φ ( z k ) | n | g ( z k ) | ( 1 | φ ( z k ) | 2 ) α + n .
Hence,
C φ , g n e = inf T is compact C φ , g n T lim sup k ω ( z k ) | φ ( z k ) | n | g ( z k ) | ( 1 | φ ( z k ) | 2 ) α + n = lim sup | φ ( z ) | 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n .
For the upper estimate, consider the operators K r on F α , K r f ( z ) = f r ( z ) = f ( r z ) , where 0 < r < 1 . Then, K r is a compact operator on F α . Let { r j } ( 0 , 1 ) be an increasing sequence such that r j 1 as j . As j , f r j f uniformly on compact subsets of D . Therefore, for any positive integer j, the operator C φ , g n K r j : F α B ω is compact. Let f F α with f F α 1 . Then,
( C φ , g n C φ , g n K r j ) f B ω = sup z D ω ( z ) | ( ( C φ , g n C φ , g n K r j ) f ) ( z ) | = sup z D ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | = sup | φ ( z ) | r N ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | + sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | ,
where N N is large enough such that r j 1 2 for all j N . As f r j ( n ) f ( n ) uniformly on compact subsets of D ,
lim sup j sup | φ ( z ) | r N ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | = 0 .
Conversely, using Lemma 1 and Theorem 2, we get
sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) ( | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) |   +   | f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | ) | g ( z ) | sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | + sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | f ( n ) ( r j φ ( z ) ) | | g ( z ) | sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n f F α + sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | r j φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n f F α sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n + sup r N < | φ ( z ) | < 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | r j φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n .
Whenever j , we obtain | φ ( z ) | 1 ; hence, the above expression tends to
lim sup | φ ( z ) | 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n .
Applying relations (6)–(8), we get
C φ , g n C φ , g n K r j = sup f F α 1 ( C φ , g n C φ , g n K r j ) f B ω lim sup | φ ( z ) | 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n .
Therefore,
C φ , g n e lim sup j C φ , g n C φ , g n K r j lim sup | φ ( z ) | 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n .
The proof is complete.   □
Corollary 2.
Let n N 0 , α > 0 , ω be a weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) such that the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω is bounded. Then, the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω is compact if and only if
lim sup | φ ( z ) | 1 ω ( z ) | g ( z ) | ( 1 | φ ( z ) | 2 ) α + n = 0 .

3. Boundedness and Compactness of C φ , g n : F α D ω

In this section, we investigate the norm, boundedness, and compactness of the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω . First, we obtain the exact norm of the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω .
Theorem 4.
Let n N , α > 0 , ω be a radial weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) . Then,
C φ , g n F α D ω = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 .
Proof. 
Consider the function
f ξ ( z ) = 1 ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α , ξ T .
It is clear that f ξ F α = 1 . Therefore,
C φ , g n F α D ω C φ , g n f ξ D ω = | ( C φ , g n f ξ ) ( 0 ) | 0 + D | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 = ( l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) ) 2 D | ξ | 2 n | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( α + n ) | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( α + n ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 .
The above holds for every ξ T . Thus,
l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( α + n ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 C φ , g n F α D ω .
Now, we prove the other part of the inequality. Let f F α . Then, there exists a μ M such that μ = f F α and
f ( z ) = T d μ ( ξ ) ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α .
Moreover,
f ( n ) ( z ) = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) n + α d μ ( ξ ) .
Thus, Jensen’s inequality implies that
| f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) 2 T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) ) n + α d μ ( ξ ) 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) 2 μ 2 T | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d | μ | ( ξ ) μ .
Set β = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) . Then, based on Fubini’s Theorem,
D | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) β 2 μ D T | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d | μ | ( ξ ) d A ( z ) = β 2 μ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) d | μ | ( ξ ) β 2 μ sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) T d | μ | ( ξ ) β 2 μ 2 sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) = β 2 f F α 2 sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) .
Thus,
C φ , g n f D ω = D | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 β f F α sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 .
Therefore,
C φ , g n F α D ω l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) 1 2 .
The proof is complete.   □
Through the application of Theorem 4, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.
Let n N , α > 0 , ω be a radial weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) . Then, the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω is bounded if and only if
sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < .
Corollary 4.
Let n N , α > 0 , ω be a radial weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) . If
D | g ( z ) | 2 ( 1 | φ ( z ) | ) 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) <
then C φ , g n : F α D ω is bounded.
Proof. 
For any ξ T ,
D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) D | g ( z ) | 2 ( 1 | φ ( z ) | ) 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) .
Therefore,
sup ξ T D | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < .
Hence, based on Corollary 3, the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω is bounded.   □
Now, we find the compactness criteria of the operator.
Theorem 5.
Let n N , α > 0 , ω be a radial weight, g H ( D ) , and φ S ( D ) such that the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω is bounded. Then, the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω is compact if and only if
lim r 1 sup ξ T | φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) = 0 .
Proof. 
First, assume that (9) holds. To prove compactness, we show that for every bounded sequence { f j } j N in F α , which converges to zero uniformly on compact subsets of D , lim j C φ , g n f j D ω = 0 ; see Lemma 2.10 [13]. Since for each j N , f j F α , there exists μ j M such that μ j = f j F α and
f j ( z ) = T d μ j ( ξ ) ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α .
In this case, we have
f j ( n ) ( z ) = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) n + α d μ j ( ξ ) .
Set β = l = 0 n 1 ( α + l ) . Applying Jensen’s inequality, we have
| f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) = β 2 T ξ ¯ n ( 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) ) n + α d μ j ( ξ ) 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) β 2 μ j 2 T | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d | μ j | ( ξ ) μ j .
It follows from (9) that for every ϵ > 0 , we can find 0 < r 1 < 1 such that for any r ( r 1 , 1 ) ,
sup ξ T | φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ .
Therefore,
C φ , g n f j D ω 2 = D | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) | φ ( z ) | r | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) + | φ ( z ) | > r | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) : = Q 1 + Q 2 .
We know that f j ( n ) 0 uniformly on compact subsets of D . Therefore,
sup | φ ( z ) | r | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 < ϵ ,
for sufficiently large j, say j j 0 . In this case
Q 1 = | φ ( z ) | r | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ D | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) ϵ .
Note that we use the fact that D | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < , which can be obtained from the boundedness of the operator C φ , g n , applied to the function f ( z ) = z n .
  • Moreover, Equations (10) and (11) imply that
    Q 2 = | φ ( z ) | > r | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) β 2 μ j | φ ( z ) | > r T | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d | μ j | ( ξ ) d A ( z ) = β 2 μ j T | φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) d | μ j | ( ξ ) β 2 μ j sup ξ T | φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) T d | μ j | ( ξ ) β 2 μ j 2 sup ξ T | φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) ϵ .
    From Equations (12)–(14), we get C φ , g n f j D ω 2 ϵ . Hence, the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω is compact.
To prove the converse, note that D | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < by applying the bounded operator C φ , g n to the function f ( z ) = z n . Thus, for each ϵ > 0 , there is an r ( 0 , 1 ) such that
| φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ .
Consider the functions f t ( z ) = f ( t z ) , 0 < t < 1 , and f F α . Then, sup 0 < t < 1 f t F α f F α and f t f uniformly on compact subsets of D as t 1 . From the compactness of the operator C φ , g n and Lemma 2.10 of [13], we get
lim t 1 C φ , g n f t C φ , g n f D ω = 0 .
Thus, for each ϵ > 0 , there is a t ( 0 , 1 ) such that
C φ , g n f t C φ , g n f D ω 2 = D | f t ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ .
From (15) and (16), we have
| φ ( z ) | > r | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) | φ ( z ) | > r | f t ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) + | φ ( z ) | > r | f t ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) ϵ + f t ( n ) 2 ϵ .
Hence, for each f F α with f F α 1 , there is a δ 0 ( 0 , 1 ) and δ 0 = δ 0 ( f , ϵ ) such that for r ( δ 0 , 1 ) ,
| φ ( z ) | > r | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ .
Since C φ , g n is a compact operator, it maps bounded sets into totally bounded sets. Therefore, for every ϵ > 0 , there is a finite collection of functions f 1 , , f k with f j F α 1 , 1 j k , such that for each f F α with f F α 1 , there is a j { 1 , 2 , , k } such that
D | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ .
Conversely, it follows from (17) that if δ = max 1 j k δ j ( f j , ϵ ) , then for r ( δ , 1 ) and all j { 1 , 2 , , k } , we have
| φ ( z ) | > r | f j ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) < ϵ .
Therefore, from (18) and (19), for r ( δ , 1 ) and every f F α with f F α 1 , we get
| φ ( z ) | > r | f ( n ) ( φ ( z ) ) | 2 | g ( z ) | 2 ω ( z ) d A ( z ) ϵ .
Now, consider the function f ( z ) = f ξ ( z ) = 1 ( 1 ξ ¯ z ) α , ξ T and apply (20) to these functions; we obtain
sup ξ T | φ ( z ) | > r | g ( z ) | 2 | 1 ξ ¯ φ ( z ) | 2 ( n + α ) ω ( z ) d A ( z ) ϵ .
The proof is complete.   □

Potential Applications

Compact operators are important not only for their well-developed theory but also because they arise naturally in many applications, such as integral equations in mathematical physics. The compactness criteria established in Corollary 2.6 and 3.4 can be used to determine when the integral equation
0 z f ( n ) ( φ ( ζ ) ) g ( ζ ) d ζ = h ( z )
has a solution in the weighted Bloch space B ω or the weighted Dirichlet space D ω . Moreover, in the compact case, the operator C φ , g n can be approximated by finite-rank operators, which allows the use of numerical methods. These results also apply to special cases of the operator, including composition operators, integral operators, and differentiation-composition operators, which have been widely studied in the literature.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we systematically investigated the generalized integral-type operator C φ , g n acting between the fractional Cauchy transform space F α and two important classes of analytic function spaces: the weighted Bloch space B ω and the weighted Dirichlet space D ω . Our main objectives were to compute or estimate the operator and essential norms and characterize the boundedness and compactness of these operators.
For the operator C φ , g n : F α B ω , we established two equivalent exact formulas for the operator norm (see Theorems 1 and 2). These formulas are expressed in terms of the weight ω , functions g and φ , and parameters α and n, and they directly characterize boundedness (Corollary 1). Moreover, we obtained an estimate for the essential norm, showing that it is equivalent to a limit involving the weight and the symbol φ as | φ ( z ) | 1 (Theorem 3). Consequently, we could derive a necessary and sufficient condition for the compactness of the operator (Corollary 2).
In the second part, we studied the operator C φ , g n : F α D ω . We provided an exact formula for the operator norm (Theorem 4) and, as a corollary, gave a boundedness criterion (Corollary 3). Furthermore, we characterized the compactness of this operator as a limiting condition on the integral kernel over the region where | φ ( z ) | is close to one (Theorem 5). The proof techniques applied here involved the use of test functions, measure representations for functions in F α , and standard compactness criteria in Banach spaces of analytic functions.
The results presented here extend and unify several previous studies on composition operators, integral-type operators, and their generalizations on spaces of analytic functions. Exact norm formulas are obtained for both target spaces, and an essential norm estimate (in the sense of an equivalence) is provided for the Bloch case; for the Dirichlet case, a compactness criterion is established. Not only are these results of theoretical interest, but they also provide practical tools for verifying boundedness and compactness in concrete applications. Possible directions for future research include the study of similar operators on other function spaces, such as weighted Bergman or Hardy spaces, and the investigation of the essential norm for other operator classes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.; Methodology, M.H.; Software, E.A.; Validation, E.A. and M.G.A.; Formal analysis, M.G.A.; Investigation, M.H.; Resources, M.H.; Data curation, E.A.; Writing—original draft, E.A. and M.G.A.; Writing—review & editing, M.G.A.; Visualization, M.H.; Supervision, M.H.; Project administration, E.A.; Funding acquisition, E.A. and M.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cima, J.; Matheson, A.; Ross, W.T. The Cauchy transform. In Mathematical Surveys and Monographs; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2006; Volume 125. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hibschweiler, R.A.; MacGregor, T.H. Fractional Cauchy Transforms; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, K. Bloch type spaces of analytic functions. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1993, 23, 1143–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alighadr Ardebili, F.; Vaezi, H.; Hassanlou, M. Generalized integration operator between the Bloch-type space and weighted Dirichlet-type spaces. Kyungpook Math. J. 2020, 60, 519–534. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cima, J.; Matheson, A. Cauchy transforms and composition operators. Ill. J. Math. 1998, 4, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hibschweiler, R.A. Composition operators on spaces of fractional Cauchy transforms. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2012, 6, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, Z.; Guo, X. Product-type operators on the space of fractional Cauchy transforms. J. Funct. Spaces 2022, 2022, 2644844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharma, A.; Krishan, R.; Subhadarsini, E. Difference ofcomposition operators from the space of Cauchy integral transforms to Bloch-type spaces. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2017, 28, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abbasi, E.; Hassanlou, M. Generalized Stević-Sharma type operators on spaces of fractional Cauchy transforms. Mediterr. J. Math. 2024, 21, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stević, S. On an integral operator from the Zygmund space to the Bloch-type space on the unit ball. Glasg. Math. J. 2009, 51, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stević, S.; Ueki, S.I. Integral-type operators acting between weighted-type spaces on the unit ball. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 215, 2464–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, M.; Guo, X. Difference of differentiation composition operators on the fractional Cauchy transforms spaces. Num. Func. Anal. Optim. 2018, 39, 1291–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tjani, M. Compact Composition Operators on Some Möbius Invariant Banach Space. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassanlou, M.; Abbasi, E.; Alshehri, M.G. Essential Norm of Generalized Integral-Type Operator from the Fractional Cauchy Transform Space into Weighted Bloch and Dirichlet Spaces. Axioms 2026, 15, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms15060418

AMA Style

Hassanlou M, Abbasi E, Alshehri MG. Essential Norm of Generalized Integral-Type Operator from the Fractional Cauchy Transform Space into Weighted Bloch and Dirichlet Spaces. Axioms. 2026; 15(6):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms15060418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassanlou, Mostafa, Ebrahim Abbasi, and Maryam G. Alshehri. 2026. "Essential Norm of Generalized Integral-Type Operator from the Fractional Cauchy Transform Space into Weighted Bloch and Dirichlet Spaces" Axioms 15, no. 6: 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms15060418

APA Style

Hassanlou, M., Abbasi, E., & Alshehri, M. G. (2026). Essential Norm of Generalized Integral-Type Operator from the Fractional Cauchy Transform Space into Weighted Bloch and Dirichlet Spaces. Axioms, 15(6), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms15060418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop