Next Article in Journal
Non-Parametric Hypothesis Testing for Used Better than Aged in Laplace Transform (UBAL) Life Distributions: A Moment Inequalities Approach with Medical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Max+Sum Spanning Tree Interdiction and Improvement Problems Under Weighted l Norm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Semi-Analytical Solutions for the Shimizu–Morioka Dynamical System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Axioms and Methods for Handling Differential Equations and Inverse Problems

1
John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Óbuda University, Becsi Str. 96/B, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
2
Bioimpedance Technologies Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Bécsi Str. 96, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
3
Multidisciplinary Medical and Engineering Cellular Bioimpedance Research Group, Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Ifjusag Str. 20, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
4
Symbolic Methods in Material Analysis and Tomography Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pecs, Boszorkany Str. 6, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
5
Department of Technical Informatics, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pecs, Boszorkany Str. 6, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
6
Institute of Information Technology, University of Dunaujvaros, Tancsics M. Str. 1/A, H-2401 Dunaujvaros, Hungary
7
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technical College of Applied Sciences in Zrenjanin, Đorđa Stratimirovića 23, 23000 Zrenjanin, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2025, 14(9), 692; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14090692
Submission received: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025

1. Special Issue Summary

Modeling real-life problems requires a variety of differential equations that often cause significant challenges for researchers. In the “handling” of these mathematical models, various axioms, mathematical methods, and techniques are able to transform often very complex mathematical objects into a better-behaving representation.
This Special Issue aimed to provide to researchers a platform to present new trends, recent advancements and future research directions. Contributions that addressed key challenges in collecting axioms, mathematical methods, and procedures that are effective for handling differential equations even in cases where classical methods have limited or no applications were invited and accepted.

2. Summary of the Special Issue Research Works

Within this Special Issue, five papers are published, covering various aspects of mathematical models, various axioms, mathematical methods, and techniques. In the following, the published papers will be summarized in brief.
In [Contribution 1], Stavroulakis presents a comprehensive survey of significant oscillation conditions for all solutions of first-order linear differential equations with retarded arguments. The conditions are organized in chronological order, with particular emphasis on cases where classical or well-known oscillation criteria fail to apply. The study also highlights key advancements and underscores the importance of these refined oscillation conditions in extending the applicability of oscillation theory.
In [Contribution 2], Savović et al. compared numerical results obtained using the explicit finite difference method (EFDM) and physics-informed neural networks (PINN) for three test problems involving various initial conditions and Dirichlet boundary conditions. These results were benchmarked against analytical solutions. While both numerical approaches demonstrated strong agreement with the analytical solutions, EFDM exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Given the close correspondence among the EFDM, PINN, and analytical results, both numerical methods are deemed competitive and recommended for use. The findings are particularly relevant for simulating a range of nonlinear physical phenomena, including flood waves in rivers, chromatography, gas dynamics, and traffic flow. Moreover, the solution techniques presented in this study offer a foundation for the development of numerical models targeting this class of nonlinear partial differential equations, providing valuable guidance for current and future model developers working across diverse application domains.
In [Contribution 3], Savović et al. presented a study employing a novel physics-informed neural network (PINN) approach, the standard explicit finite difference method (EFDM), and an unconditionally positivity-preserving finite difference method to solve the one-dimensional Sine-Gordon equation (SGE). Two test problems with known analytical solutions were used to evaluate the performance of these techniques. All three approaches demonstrated strong agreement with the analytical solutions; however, EFDM showed the closest alignment. Given the consistent accuracy of the numerical results obtained by EFDM, the positivity-preserving FDM, and the PINN method, all three are recommended as competitive and reliable tools. The solution techniques explored in this work hold significant potential for current and future modeling efforts in various nonlinear wave phenomena, such as soliton propagation in optical fibers.
In [Contribution 4], Pyatkov and Soldatov investigated inverse problems involving the identification of lower-order coefficients in a second-order parabolic equation. The unknown coefficients are represented as finite series with time-dependent terms. Both the general nonlinear case and the linear case were considered. Overdetermination conditions are formulated as integrals of the solution over the boundary of the domain, weighted appropriately. The authors focused on proving existence and uniqueness theorems, as well as deriving stability estimates for the solutions to these inverse problems. The problem is reformulated as an operator equation, which is analyzed using the contraction mapping principle. The solution is shown to lie in an appropriate Sobolev space and possesses all generalized derivatives appearing in the equation, each integrable to a certain power. The proof method is constructive, offering a foundation for the development of new numerical algorithms to solve such inverse problems.
In [Contribution 5], Ene et al. conducted an analytical investigation of the Shimizu-Morioka dynamical system using the Optimal Auxiliary Functions Method (OAFM). This system exhibits chaotic behavior, relevant to various physical applications, particularly in chaos synchronization—an important phenomenon observed in numerous real-world processes. The authors derived semi-analytical solutions to the system and performed a comparative analysis between these results and numerical solutions. The comparison demonstrated the accuracy and computational efficiency of the OAFM. The method’s selection is further justified by its favorable performance relative to an iterative approach requiring 7–10 iterations. Additionally, the study explores the influence of physical parameters on the system’s damped oscillations and periodic behaviors, offering insights into the dynamic characteristics of the solutions.
The aim of this Special Issue is to provide a broad and timely contribution to the existing body of literature on differential equations and inverse problems. The featured methodologies are expected to be both valuable and engaging, attracting interest from both the scientific community and industry practitioners. The novel strategies presented herein are intended to inspire researchers across mathematics and related multidisciplinary fields, encouraging further investigation into advanced approaches for addressing differential equations and inverse problems. Future research may focus on refining and extending these techniques to enhance their effectiveness and applicability in increasingly complex real-world scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.V. and V.T.; writing—original draft preparation, V.T.; writing—review and editing, Z.V., Z.S., V.T. and P.O.; supervision, M.K., R.K. and P.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors wish to express their appreciation and deep gratitude to all of the authors and reviewers who contributed to this Special Issue. This research was a part of project 2023-1.1.1-PIACI_FÓKUSZ-2024-00011 of the Óbuda University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Stavroulakis, I.P. A Survey on the Oscillation of First-Order Retarded Differential Equations. Axioms 2024, 13, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13060407.
  • Savović, S.; Ivanović, M.; Min, R. A Comparative Study of the Explicit Finite Difference Method and Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving the Burgers’ Equation. Axioms 2023, 12, 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12100982.
  • Savović, S.; Ivanović, M.; Drljača, B.; Simović, A. Numerical Solution of the Sine–Gordon Equation by Novel Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Two Different Finite Difference Methods. Axioms 2024, 13, 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13120872.
  • Pyatkov, S.; Soldatov, O. Inverse Problems of Recovering Lower-Order Coefficients from Boundary Integral Data. Axioms 2025, 14, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14020116.
  • Ene, R.-D.; Pop, N.; Badarau, R. Semi-Analytical Solutions for the Shimizu–Morioka Dynamical System. Axioms 2025, 14, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14080580.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vizvári, Z.; Klincsik, M.; Kersner, R.; Odry, P.; Sári, Z.; Tadić, V. Axioms and Methods for Handling Differential Equations and Inverse Problems. Axioms 2025, 14, 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14090692

AMA Style

Vizvári Z, Klincsik M, Kersner R, Odry P, Sári Z, Tadić V. Axioms and Methods for Handling Differential Equations and Inverse Problems. Axioms. 2025; 14(9):692. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14090692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vizvári, Zoltán, Mihály Klincsik, Róbert Kersner, Péter Odry, Zoltán Sári, and Vladimir Tadić. 2025. "Axioms and Methods for Handling Differential Equations and Inverse Problems" Axioms 14, no. 9: 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14090692

APA Style

Vizvári, Z., Klincsik, M., Kersner, R., Odry, P., Sári, Z., & Tadić, V. (2025). Axioms and Methods for Handling Differential Equations and Inverse Problems. Axioms, 14(9), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14090692

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop