Next Article in Journal
Henri Poincaré’s Comment on Calculus and Albert Einstein’s Comment on Entropy: Mathematical Physics on the Tenth Anniversary of Axioms
Next Article in Special Issue
Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP Integrated Model in a Smartness Assessment Framework of Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
A Superbundle Description of Differential K-Theory
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Rubberized Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash and Nano Silica by Artificial Neural Network Technique

by Musa Adamu 1,*, Andaç Batur Çolak 2, Yasser E. Ibrahim 1,*, Sadi I. Haruna 3 and Mukhtar Fatihu Hamza 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors conducted experimental program for rubberized concrete then utilized ANN method. Paper is good but needs to improved.

The authors more emphasize the importance of using recycled materials. Almost no significant sentecences and references were done.

Add a paragraph to discuss the use of recycled materials on

There are other materials to replace cement and aggregate such as waste glass, marble, bottom coal and etc. These should be indicated using followings: use of recycled coal bottom ash in reinforced concrete beams as replacement for aggregate; concrete containing waste glass as an environmentally friendly aggregate: a review on fresh and mechanical characteristics; mechanical behavior of crushed waste glass as replacement of aggregates;flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams using waste marble powder towards application of sustainable concrete; Effects of Waste Powder, influence of replacing cement with waste glass on mechanical properties of concrete; Fine and Coarse Marble Aggregates on Concrete Compressive Strength; Investigation on improvement in shear performance of reinforced-concrete beams produced with recycled steel wires from waste tires; Performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced concretes produced with steel fibers extracted from waste tire; Improvement in Bending Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams Produced with Waste Lathe Scraps

Novelty of paper is not clear. What is the difference with other studies

The size of crumb rubbers is higher than fine aggregate. Why the authors did not use same size materials?

The authors can include followings to emphasize the importance of ANN: Prediction Models for Marshall Mix Parameters Using Bio-inspired Genetic Programming and Deep Machine Learning Approaches: A Comparative Study; Free vibration analysis of open-cell FG porous beams: analytical, numerical and ANN approaches

Include both Vf and Wf ratio of crumbed rubber.

Why did you use only your data for ANN modeling. There are lots of studies on this subject. You can include them to increase accuracy

Add photo of rubber

Add photo of test setup

Concluison section is only based on ANN. Improve this section

Include future needs and recommendations

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper can be published after the corrections have been made. Please send the paper again after the authors make corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The submitted article, “Prediction of mechanical Properties of rubberized concrete incorporating fly ash and nano silica by artificial neural network technique” is interesting, original and within the scope of the journal but some changes should be addressed:

1.       Please update the state of the art by giving some examples of admixtures materials properties (e.g. surface, thermal stability) as you mentioned in the text from line 42 to 45 (please see   https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.19.5.7161) in order to understand how the material could influence the properties of final product.

2.       At line 113 the authors used commercial nanosilica, please mention the type, manufacturer and the country. Also, please give information regarding the fly ash origin.

3.       Please use the same font and size for text in figures.

4.       Try to eliminate the gridlines from figure 1.

5.        I recommend to give informations regarding the reproducibility and the repeatability of the experiments.

6.       Try to reformulate the results section in order to have results and discussion.

7.       Please rewrite the references according to journal instructions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper can be accepted in this current form

Back to TopTop