1. Introduction
Let be the disk, centered at zero, of radius where
We denote by
We say that a function
f of the form
is convex on
if and only if
is a convex domain in the set
and the function
f is univalent.
We know that the function
f is convex on
if and only if
We say that
f is a convex function of order
on
if
The radius of convexity of order
for
f is defined by the equality
We say that
f is uniformly convex in the disk
if the function
f has the form in (
1), it is a convex function, and it has the property that the arc
is convex for every circular arc
contained in the disk
with center
, also in
. The function
f is uniformly convex in the disk
if and only if
We know that the radius of uniform convexity is defined by
The Bessel function of the first kind is defined by
Consider the following normalized forms:
and
where
is a real number and
, and
and
are entire functions.
This article can be considered a continuation of previous papers [
1,
2] which dealt with geometric properties of Bessel functions.
For more details about the geometric properties of Bessel functions, interested readers are referred to the following papers: [
1,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13].
The aim of this work is to determine the radius of convexity of order , for and and the radius of uniform convexity for the case and to derive an interesting connection between the convexity and uniform convexity.
In the next section, we provide several results which are necessary later in this work.
2. Preliminaries
Lemma 1 ([
14], p. 483, Hurwitz)
. If then has exactly two purely imaginary conjugate complex zeros, and all the other zeros are real. The zeros are taken to be , where We may suppose, without restricting the generality, that and
Lemma 2 ([
14], p. 502)
. The following equality holds Lemma 3 ([
8])
. In the notations of Lemma 2, we haveandThe series are uniformly convergent on every compact subset of
Lemma 4 ([
9])
. If , , and , then Proof. The following implications hold
If the last two inequalities are multiplied by the inequality we obtain the desired results. □
Lemma 5. If , , then Proof. We can prove the second inequality of the following equivalence:
where
.
We prove the inequality (
10) in two steps.
Let
; then, it is obvious that
where
.
On the other hand, a simple calculation results in
It is easily seen that (
11) and (
12) imply the second inequality of (
10). Finally, multiplying the inequality
by the first inequality of (
10), we obtain (
9) and the proof is complete. □
Lemma 6. If , , and , then Proof. The inequality obviously holds provided that
(see (
10)), thus, we have to prove it in the case that
We can then prove the following inequality:
We define
and define the mapping
As
and
, it follows that
We can determine the maximum of the function
The derivative
has one positive root,
, and one negative root,
As
and
it follows the inequality
for every
From (
15) and (
16), we have (
14). Finally, multiplying the inequalities (
14),
and the first inequality of (
10), we infer (
13). □
Lemma 7. If the functions and are defined by (4) and (5), respectively, then Proof. We differentiate the equality (
4), and at the second time we differentiate it logarithmically. After multiplying by
z, we obtain the following equality:
The function
is a solution of the Bessel differential equation; thus, we can replace the function
using the equality
, and it follows that
In the second step, we use the following well-known equality:
, and infer
Finally, we replace
in the numerator by
and obtain (
17).
We differentiate equality (
5) twice, similarly to the case of the function
and obtain
We use the equality
and obtain
Now, using the equality
we infer
and combining this with the equality
, (
18) follows. □
3. Main Results
Theorem 1. If and , then the radius of convexity of order α for the mapping is where is the unique root of the equationin the interval Proof. According to the proof of Theorem 1 [
2], the equalities
imply
The logarithmic differentation of this equality leads to
It is proven in Theorem 1 [
2] that the radius of starlikeness,
, for the function
is the smallest root of the equation
in the interval
Thus, we have
Taking into account that
the equality (
20) implies the following inequality:
for every
Using
and
in Lemma 4, we obtain
In a similar manner, Lemma 5 and Lemma 6 imply that
Now, inequalities (
22)–(
24) imply the following inequality:
provided that
where
verifies the inequalities (
21).
The following equalities hold:
and
Consequently, equation
has a real root in the interval
The smallest positive real root of the equation
is denoted by
and this root is the radius of convexity of order
of the function
The first equality of Lemma 7 and the equality
imply that the equation
is equivalent to (
19).
□
We determine the radius of uniform convexity of the mapping in the next theorem.
Theorem 2. If then the radius of uniform convexity for the mapping is where is the smallest positive root of the equationin the interval Proof. Equality (
20) implies the following inequality:
We can again use inequalities (
22) and (
23), and in combination with (
27), we have
Inequalities (
25) and (
27) imply
The smallest positive root of the equation
in the interval
is denoted by
According to (
28), the value
is the biggest with the property that
Lemma 7 and the equality
imply that the equation
is equivalent to (
26), completing the proof. □
Theorems 1 and 2 imply the following result.
Corollary 1. The mapping is uniformly convex in the disk if and only if it is convex of order
Theorem 3. If and then the radius of convexity of order α for the mapping is where is the smallest real root of the equationin the interval Proof. According to the proof of Theorem 2 [
2], the equalities
imply
where
The logarithmic differentiation of the equality leads to
It is proven in [
2] that the radius of starlikeness,
, for function
is the smallest root of the equation
Taking into the account that
we obtain from relation (
30)
and
. We obtain from Lemmas 4 and 5 the following inequality:
similarly to the proof of Theorem 1. The mapping
is strictly decreasing, and
We then have
and the equation
has at least one real root in the interval
The smallest positive real root of the equation
is denoted by
and this root is the radius of convexity of order
of the function
The second equality of Lemma 7 and the equality
imply that the equation
is equivalent to (
29). □
Theorem 4. If and then the radius of uniform convexity of is where is the smallest positive root of the equationin the interval Proof. Equality (
30) implies the following inequality:
We obtain the following from the relation (
31), Lemma 4, and the relation (
34):
Inequalities (
32) and (
34) imply
The smallest positive root of the equation in the interval is denoted by
According to (
35), the value
is the biggest with the property that
The equation
is equivalent to (
33), completing the proof. Lemma 7 and the equality
imply that the equation
is equivalent to (
33). □
From Theorems 3 and 4, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2. The function is uniformly convex in the disk if and only if it is convex of order
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; methodology, R.S.; software, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; validation, R.S.; formal analysis, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; investigation, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; resources, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; data curation, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; writing—review and editing, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; visualization, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; supervision, R.S.; project administration, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K.; funding acquisition, L.-I.C., R.S. and P.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the referees for their valuable suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Deniz, E.; Szász, R. The radius of uniform convexity of Bessel functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 453, 572–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szász, R. About the radius of starlikeness of Bessel functions of the first kind. Monatsh. Math. 2015, 176, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baricz, Á.; Szakál, A.; Szász, R.; Yagmur, N. Radii of starlikeness and convexity of a product and cross-product of Bessel functions. Results Math. 2018, 73, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baricz, Á. Geometric properties of generalized Bessel functions. Publ. Math. Debrecen 2008, 73, 155–178. [Google Scholar]
- Baricz, Á. Generalized Bessel Functions of the First Kind; Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1994; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume XIV, p. 206. ISBN 978-3-642-12229-3. [Google Scholar]
- Baricz, Á.; Ponnusamy, S. Starlikeness and convexity of generalized Bessel functions. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2010, 21, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baricz, Á.; Szász, R. The radius of convexity of normalized Bessel functions. Anal. Math. 2015, 41, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baricz, Á.; Kupán, A.P.; Szász, R. The radius of starlikeness of normalized Bessel functions of the first kind. Proc. AMS 2014, 142, 2019–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulut, S.; Engel, O. The radius of starlikeness, Convexity and uniform convexity of the Legendre polynomials of odd degree. Results Math. 2019, 74, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.Y.; Engel, O. Certain properties of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function. Electronic J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2018, 6, 288–294. [Google Scholar]
- Murat, Ç.; Deniz, E.; Szász, R. Radii of a-convexity of some normalized Bessel functions of the first kind. Results Math. 2017, 72, 2023–2035. [Google Scholar]
- Engel, O.; Kupán, A.P.; Páll-Szabó, Á.O. About the radius of convexity of some analytic functions. Creat. Math. Inform. 2015, 24, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engel, O.; Páll-Szabó, Á.O. The radius of convexity of particular functions and applications to the study of a second order differential inequality. Izv. Nats. Akad. Nauk Armenii Mat. 2017, 52, 127–132, Reprinted in J. Contemp. Math. Anal. 2017, 52, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, G.N. A Treatise of the Theory of Bessel Functions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1944. [Google Scholar]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).