Abstract
Consider a point on a convex surface in , and a plane of support to the surface at this point. Draw a plane parallel with cutting a part of the surface. We study the limiting behavior of this part of the surface when the plane approaches the point, being always parallel with . More precisely, we study the limiting behavior of the normalized surface area measure in induced by this part of the surface. In this paper, we consider two cases: (a) when the point is regular and (b) when it is singular conical, that is the tangent cone at the point does not contain straight lines. In Case (a), the limit is the atom located at the outward normal vector to , and in Case (b), the limit is equal to the measure induced by the part of the tangent cone cut off by a plane.
Keywords:
convex surfaces; surface area measure of a convex body; Newton’s problem of minimal resistance MSC:
52A20; 26B25
1. Introduction
Consider a convex compact set C with a nonempty interior in Euclidean space , . Let be a point on its boundary, and let be a plane of support to C at . Consider the part of the boundary containing and bounded by a plane parallel with . We are interested in studying the limiting properties of this part of the boundary when the bounding plane approaches
In what follows, a convex compact set with a nonempty interior will be called a convex body.
The point is called regular if the plane of support at this point is unique and singular otherwise. It is well known that regular points form a full-measure set in .
Let e denote the outward unit normal vector to . Take , and let be the plane parallel with at the distance t from it, on the side opposite to the normal vector. Thus, the plane is given by the equation and by the equation . The body C is contained in the closed half-space . Here and in what follows, means the scalar product.
Consider the convex body:
In other words, is the part of C cut off by the plane . The boundary of is the union of the convex set of codimension 1:
and the convex surface:
thus, .
In what follows, we will denote as the m-dimensional Hausdorff measure of the Borel set . By default, means .
Let denote the outward unit normal to C at a regular point , and let S be a Borel subset of . The surface area measure induced by S is the Borel measure defined in satisfying
for any Borel subset . In the case when S coincides with , we obtain the well-known measure called the surface area measure of the convex body C. For this measure, the following well-known relation takes place:
Denote by the normalized measure induced by the surface ; more precisely,
That is, for any Borel set , it holds
The surface area measure of equals ; hence,
We say that weakly converges to as and denote , if for any continuous function f on , it holds
Similarly, we say that is a weak partial limit of the measure , if there exists a sequence of positive numbers converging to 0 such that, for any continuous function f on , it holds
In this article, we are going to study the limiting properties of the measure as .
One such property is derived immediately. Let be a weak limit or a weak partial limit of . Passing to the limit or to the limit in Formula (4), one obtains
The tangent cone to C at is the closure of the union of all rays with vertex at that intersect . Equivalently, the tangent cone at is the smallest closed cone with the vertex at that contains C; see Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The tangent cone and the normal cone to a convex body C.
If the tangent cone at is a half-space, then the point is regular, and vice versa.
The normal cone to C at is the union of all rays with vertex at whose director vector is the outward normal to a plane of support at . It is denoted as . An equivalent definition is the following: the normal cone at is the set of points r that satisfy for all . The normal cone to a convex body does not contain straight lines. Both tangent and normal cones are, of course, convex sets.
If the dimension of equals d (equivalently, if the tangent cone does not contain straight lines), then is called a conical point of C. If the dimension of equals 1, then is regular, and vice versa. In the intermediate case, that is if the dimension of is greater than 1, but smaller than d, is called a ridge point. This notation goes back to Pogorelov [1].
The motivation for this study comes, to a great extent, from extremal problems in classes of convex bodies and, in particular, from Newton’s problem of least resistance for convex bodies [2]. It is natural to try to develop a geometric method of the small variation of convex bodies for such problems, and perhaps, the simplest way would be cutting a small part of the body by a plane. This method proved itself to be effective in the case of Newton’s problem. Let us describe this problem in some detail.
The problem in a class of radially symmetric bodies was first stated and solved by Newton himself in 1687 in [3]. The more general version of the problem was posed by Buttazzo and Kawohl in 1993 in [2]. This general problem can be formulated in the functional form as follows:
Find the smallest value of the functional
in the class of convex functions satisfying , where is a planar convex body and .
The physical meaning of this problem is as follows: find the optimal streamlined shape of a convex body moving downwards through an extremely rarefied medium, provided that the body–particle collisions are perfectly elastic.
Problem (6) (along with its further generalizations) has been studied in various papers including [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], but has not been solved completely until now.
It was conjectured in 1995 in [6] that the slope of the graph of an optimal function near the zero level set equals 1. This conjecture was numerically disproven by Wachsmuth (personal communication) in the case when has an empty interior and, therefore, is a line segment. Moreover, numerical simulation shows that the infimum of in the complement of is strictly greater than 1.
On the other hand, this conjecture was proven by the author in [14] in the case when has a nonempty interior. More precisely, it was proven that if u minimizes functional (6), then for almost all , it holds
The proof is based on the results concerning local properties of convex surfaces near ridge points in the case . These results were formulated, with the proofs being briefly outlined, in [14].
Remark 1.
The limiting behavior ofin the caseis quite simple. In this case, the tangent cone is an angle, which degenerates to a half-plane if the point is regular. We will call it the tangent angle. Let the tangent angle toatbe given by
and e be given by
Thus,andare the outward unit normals to the sides of the angle, and e is the outward unit normal to a line of support at. Then, the limiting measure is the sum of two atoms:
The proof of this relation is simple and is left to the reader.
Note that if the pointis regular, then. It may also happen that the point is singular, that is, and e coincides with one of the vectorsand. In both cases, the limiting measure is an atom:
The limiting behavior of is different for different kinds of points:
(a) If the point is regular, then the limiting measure is an atom.
(b) If r is a conical point, then the limiting measure coincides with the measure induced by the part of the boundary of the tangent cone cut off by a plane , (note that all the induced measures with are proportional).
(c) The case of ridge points is the most interesting. In this case, the limiting measure may not exist, and the characterization of all possible partial limits is a difficult task.
Still, the study is nontrivial also in Cases (a) and (b). In this paper, we restrict ourselves to these cases, while Case (c) is postponed to the future. The main results of the paper are contained in the following Theorems 1 and 2.
Theorem 1.
Ifis a regular point of, then
Let be a conical point, K be the tangent cone at , be the part of containing cut off by the plane , and be the intersection of the cone with the cutting plane , , that is
Let be the part of the cone cut off by the plane ; its boundary is .
All measures induced by are proportional, that is the measure:
does not depend on t.
Theorem 2.
Ifis a conical point of, then
2. Proof of Theorem 1
The proof is based on several propositions.
Consider a convex set , and let be its -dimensional volume and be the -dimensional volume of its boundary.
Proposition 1.
If D contains a circle of radius a, then
Proof.
Let be an infinitesimal element of the boundary of D and denote by its -dimensional volume. Consider the pyramid with the vertex at the center O of the circle and with the base , that is the union of line segments joining O with the points of . Let be the element of the -dimensional volume of this pyramid; see Figure 2. Then, we have
and therefore,
From here follows Inequality (9). □
Figure 2.
The convex set D containing a circle of radius a.
Consider Euclidean space with the coordinates , , and fix and .
Proposition 2.
Let a convex bodybe contained between the planesand,. Let D be the image of C under the natural projection ofon the x-plane,, and letbe the-dimensional volume of. Let a domainbe such that the outward normalat each regular pointsatisfies. (In other words, the angles betweenforand the vectorsare.) Then,
Proof.
The body C is bounded below by the graph of a convex function, say , and above by the graph of a concave function, say ; see Figure 3. Both functions are defined on D. That is, we have
Figure 3.
The body C between two parallel planes and is shown. Here, is represented by the union of two curves bounded by the points.
Let denote the intersection of with the graph of . Clearly, if a point is regular and belongs to , then .
For , denote by the -dimensional volume of the set:
One clearly has . Let s be the -dimensional parameter in , and let be the element of the -dimensional volume in . Denote by the point in corresponding to the parameter s. Then, the -dimensional volume of equals
The same argument holds for . It follows that . □
Proposition 3.
If a convex set incontainsmutually orthogonal line segments of length 1, then it also contains a ball of radius.
Proof.
Denote the convex set by D and the segments by , . Since all points lie in D, each convex combination of the form , where J denotes a map , also lies in D. The convex combination of the set of points is a hypercube with the size of length and contains the ball of radius with the center at the hypercube’s center. □
Proposition 4.
containsmutually orthogonal line segments of length, whereas.
Proof.
Take a unit vector orthogonal to e, and consider the 2-dimensional plane through parallel with e and . The intersection is a 2-dimensional convex body, and is a regular point on its boundary; the intersection is a line orthogonal to e at the distance t from ; the intersection is a line segment (maybe degenerating to a point or the empty set). Equivalently, this segment is the intersection of the body with the line . Since the point is regular, we conclude that the length of this segment satisfies as .
Now, choose unit vectors in such a way that the set of vectors forms an orthonormal system in . For each , draw the 2-dimensional plane through parallel with e and . The intersections are line segments parallel with , and therefore, they are mutually orthogonal. The lengths of these segments satisfy as . Taking , one comes to the statement of the proposition. □
Recall that is the intersection of with the half-space and is the plane of the equation . For , denote by the part of containing the regular points r satisfying . In other words, is the set of regular points r in such that the angle between e and is greater than or equal to .
Proposition 5.
We have
Proof.
Consider a coordinate system , such that the x-plane coincides with and the z-axis is directed toward the vector e. For sufficiently small, the intersection of and the interior of C is nonempty for all . The angle between and the outward normal at each regular point of , is greater than a positive value . That is, for any regular point , it holds . Without loss of generality, one can take , and then, for all regular points , it holds .
In the chosen coordinate system, is contained between the planes and . Denote by the image of under the natural projection . The domain contains and is contained in the -neighborhood of ; hence, its -dimensional volume does not exceed , where means the area of the -dimensional unit sphere.
Applying Proposition 2 to the body and the domain , one obtains
By Propositions 3 and 4, contains a ball of radius , and therefore, by Proposition 1,
and additionally, , where means the volume of the unit ball in . Hence,
□
Let us now finish the proof of Theorem 1.
Recall that is the surface area measure induced by S. For all , one has
Proposition 5 implies that the measure converges to 0 as . Indeed, for any continuous function f on ,
On the other hand, the measure is supported in the set in containing all points whose radius vector forms the angle with e. It follows that each partial limit of and, therefore, each partial limit of are supported in this set. Since can be made arbitrary small, one concludes that each partial limit of is proportional to . Finally, utilizing Equality (5) true for each partial limit , one concludes that the limit of exists and is equal to .
3. Proof of Theorem 2
In the proof, we will use the well-known fact that the surface area measure is continuous with respect to the Hausdorff topology in the space of convex bodies.
More precisely, we say that a family of convex bodies , in converges to a convex body as in the sense of Hausdorff and write , if for any , there exists such that for all , is contained in the -neighborhood of C and C is contained in the -neighborhood of .
It is well known that if , then as .
Choose so , and therefore,
Let the origin coincide with the point , that is ; then, the homothety of a set with the center at and ratio k is . See Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The tangent cone at , the cutting planes and , and the sets , , and in the case when the point is conical.
Proposition 6.
.
Proof.
Note that for all positive and ,
Additionally, since the tangent cone K contains C, then contains , and so,
Let now . Since and belong to C, so does their linear combination,
On the other hand, . It follows that . We conclude that
that is form a nested family of sets contained in .
Suppose that does not converge to . This implies that the closure of the union
is contained in, but does not coincide with, .
The union:
is a cone with the vertex at ; it is contained in the tangent cone K, but does not coincide with it. On the other hand,
that is C is contained in the cone , which is smaller than the tangent cone K. This contradiction proves our proposition. □
From Proposition 6, it follows, in particular, that
and therefore,
Denote
Since the convex body contains both and , we have
Recall that is the part of the tangent cone cut off by the plane . We have . Since by Proposition 6, , we conclude that , that is
Using this relation and the double inclusion:
one concludes that converges to in the sense of Hausdorff, and therefore,
Theorem 2 is proven.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA) through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), within Projects UIDB/04106/2020 and UIDP/04106/2020.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Pogorelov, A.V. Extrinsic Geometry of Convex Surfaces; American Mathematical Society (AMS): Providence, RI, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Buttazzo, G.; Kawohl, B. On Newton’s problem of minimal resistance. Math. Intell. 1993, 15, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newton, I. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica; Streater: London, UK, 1687. [Google Scholar]
- Belloni, M.; Kawohl, B. A paper of Legendre revisited. Forum Math. 1997, 9, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brock, F.; Ferone, V.; Kawohl, B. A symmetry problem in the calculus of variations. Calc. Var. 1996, 4, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buttazzo, G.; Ferone, V.; Kawohl, B. Minimum problems over sets of concave functions and related questions. Math. Nachr. 1995, 173, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buttazzo, G.; Guasoni, P. Shape optimization problems over classes of convex domains. J. Convex Anal. 1997, 4, 343–351. [Google Scholar]
- Comte, M.; Lachand-Robert, T. Newton’s problem of the body of minimal resistance under a single-impact assumption. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 2001, 12, 173–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachand-Robert, T.; Oudet, E. Minimizing within convex bodies using a convex hull method. SIAM J. Optim. 2006, 16, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachand-Robert, T.; Peletier, M.A. Newton’s problem of the body of minimal resistance in the class of convex developable functions. Math. Nachr. 2001, 226, 153–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plakhov, A. Billiards and two-dimensional problems of optimal resistance. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 2009, 194, 349–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plakhov, A.; Torres, D. Newton’s aerodynamic problem in media of chaotically moving particles. Sbornik Math. 2005, 196, 885–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachsmuth, G. The numerical solution of Newton’s problem of least resistance. Math. Program. 2014, 147, 331–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plakhov, A. On generalized Newton’s aerodynamic problem. Trans. Mosc. Math. Soc. 2021, 82, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).