Smart Competence Management Using Business Analytics with Fuzzy Predicates
and Victor de-León-Gómez
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
In the field of selection and recruitment of Human Resources things are in a continuous dynamic.
In second section Background I believe the authors try to present a so called stat of the art of different analytics techniques for HR assessment and improvement. They briefly present some methods like AHP, fuzzy AHP, AHP and TOPSIS but there are many more. Any how in this chapter are very few references.
Chapter 3 Conceptual framework make again an apology for the importance of Human Resources. This was understood from the introduction. It would have been more appropriate if the authors had provided more information about the software used.
Chapter 4 Materials and Methods the authors state that a methodology is presented. Well, hardly it can be named a methodology, merely some assumptions in order to perform an analysis.
In chapter 5 Case study , the scholars Lombardo & Eichinger, 2004 are not cited.
A list of full competencies should be provided C1-C 52.
Maybe a native English speaker should proofreading.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Kind regards.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper has a number of problems that need to be addressed before one can properly evaluate it. On the page 1, line 41, there is a sentence that starts with "This data"which does not continue on page 2! Also, on page 1 books do not make things popular but authors make things popular with their writings.... On top of page 2 something is missing. In the same page, in section 2, the second sentence is a bit strange and I think something is missing there too. However, the authors have a very bad habbit to start sentences with a citation. Thus instead of "[12] describes" please use "Smith [12] describes". On page 6 there is equation (1). The problem is that they do not describe how and why they replace the universal quantifier with a meet operation. Also, in equation 3, they replace the existential quantifier with a join operation, without explaining why they do this and how it is possible. To be honest, I stopped there since I cannot proceed if these points cannot be resolved.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Kind regards.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
I would like to congratulate the authors for their efforts to improve the paper.
I believe that the authors have significantly improved the aspects highlighted, as a result I believe that the article can be published in its current form.
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper has been revised and it looks OK now.
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
