Next Article in Journal
Chondrite Shock Metamorphism History Assessed by Non-Destructive Analyses on Ca-Phosphates and Feldspars in the Cangas de Onís Regolith Breccia
Next Article in Special Issue
Rare Earth Element Recovery from Acidic Extracts of Florida Phosphate Mining Materials Using Chelating Polymer 1-Octadecene, Polymer with 2,5-Furandione, Sodium Salt
Previous Article in Journal
Geometallurgical Characterization of Non-Ferrous Historical Slag in Western Tasmania: Identifying Reprocessing Options
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study of Different Columns Sizes for Ultrafine Apatite Flotation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geochemical Characteristics of Dolomitic Phosphorite Containing Rare Earth Elements and Its Weathered Ore

1
College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2
Mining College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(7), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070416
Submission received: 12 April 2019 / Revised: 2 July 2019 / Accepted: 4 July 2019 / Published: 8 July 2019

Abstract

:
In order to provide a good theoretical guidance for the development and utilization of weathered phosphorite resources, we investigated the geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of primary and weathered phosphorites. The analysis of trace elements showed that the primary ore has hydrothermal sedimentation effect in the later stage, the weathered ore has obvious residual enrichment and the phosphate ore belongs to clastic lithologic phosphate rock. In addition, through leaching test method, it was shown that rare earth elements are present in fluorapatite in the form of isomorphic substitution, and the proportion of rare earth elements adsorbed on clay and other minerals was likely to be between 2% and 3%. The light rare earth elements are relatively enriched in both primary and weathered phosphorite, and Ce and Eu have obvious negative anomalies. The primary phosphorite is a dolomitic phosphorite containing rare earth elements, which are naturally enriched by weathering, and its weathered ore has obvious residual enrichment, while the deposit was characterized by normal marine sedimentation and hydrothermal action.

1. Introduction

Phosphorite is a non-renewable resource without substitute and a significant raw material for phosphatic fertilizers and phosphorus-based chemicals [1,2,3]. There are abundant sedimentary phosphorite deposits in China, most of which were formed in the Neoproterozoic Late Sinian and in the Paleozoic early Cambrian [4,5]. Supergene weathering of these phosphorites produced weathered phosphorite, a potential industrial type of phosphorite, which is a high-quality ore [6]. The formation of weathered phosphorite is restricted and controlled by the geochemical characteristics of primary ore and the external conditions of ore bodies or rock masses presence [7]. Weathering changed the characteristics of phosphorite, and there is a significant difference between weathered ore and primary ore, regardless of their characteristics or grade [8]. Relative to fresh phosphorite, weathered phosphorite is generally enriched in alkali metals, alkaline earth elements, halogen and radioactive elements, and depleted in mantle elements [7,9]. Weathered phosphorites are also characterized by generally enrichment in light rare earth elements (LREE), depletion in HREE, and Eu negative anomaly [10,11].
Different rocks and ores have different resistance to weathering. Carbonate is easier to be weathered and denuded than phosphate, and the weathering products, calcium, and magnesium are easily leached away, residually enriching apatite [12,13,14]. The phosphorites of Gezhongwu Formation in Zhijin County mainly are bioclast dolomitic and siliceous. The bioclastic components of the phosphorites consist of pelecypods, gastropods, algae, etc [15]. Wang et al. (2004) studied the genesis of the Xinhua phosphorite deposit in Guizhou China and analyzed the REE composition of the ore using ICP-MS [16]. They concluded that phosphorite was formed exclusively by marine sediments deposited in ancient pericontinental seas. They also suggested that the phosphorite deposit was subjected to strong weathering after deep buried diagenetic processes, which did not change its REE composition remarkably. A systematic study of leaching of rare earths from a phosphorite ore using four leaching modes [17]: sulfuric acid leaching, phosphoric acid leaching, mixed acid leaching, and two-step leaching of phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid was carried out by Jin et al.(2017). Wang (2011) found that the Sr/Ba ratio of weathered phosphorite ores is generally less than 1 due to dissolution of dolomite [7], and the U/Th ratio is generally significantly lower than that of primary phosphorite ores.
Although some geological work has been done on the phosphorite deposits in southern China, the weathered phosphorite has not been fully recognized and studied. In this study, we investigated the mineralogical and geochemical composition of the primary and weathered phosphorites to optimize the use of weathered phosphorite and their rare earth elements in industry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Six phosphorite samples from different locations in the Zhijin mining district in the Guizhou Province, China, were analyzed for their major oxides and trace elements composition, using the lithum borate/lithum metaborate and X spectrofluorimetry methods [18,19]. The assay results are summarized in Table 1. The samples 1 and 2 are form primary phosphorites and samples 3 to 6 are form weathered phosphorites according to the weathered phosphorite criteria proposed by Zhang et al. [6,20].

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

In order to identify the mineral composition of phosphorite samples, an X-ray powder diffract meter (Rigaku D/MAX 2500, Tokyo, Japan) was applied by using Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 100 mA). The samples were scanned at the speed of 6°/min over a 2θ range of 2.6–45°. Furthermore, SIROQUANT software (V3, Sietronics) was carried out to quantify the mineralogical composition. The software used the full-profile Rietveld method to refine the shape of calculated XRD pattern against the profile of a measured pattern [21].

2.2.2. Optical Microscopy

Thin section of phosphorite samples were prepared and investigate by optical microscopy [22,23]. An Olympus CX21 polarizing microscope was used to investigate the mineral characteristics and textural relationships of phosphorite.

2.2.3. SEM-EDX

The morphology, composition, and orientation of phosphorites were studied using a Hitachi 3400 N scanning electron microscope (SEM) in Guizhou University Physical and Chemical Testing Center lab. The morphology was studied using back scattered electrons (BSE) and the composition of the various phases using EDX [24,25,26].

2.3. Leaching Test

In order to determine the presence of REE, phosphorite samples were leached with different acids and inorganic salts [17]. A 10 g composite sample was leached with acid (HCl or HNO3) and whereas a 5 g composite samples was leached with inorganic salt. The experiments were carried out at room temperature for 2 h in 100 mL leaching agent with acids concentrations of 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, and 11% and inorganic salts concentrations of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%. The main reactions can be summarized as follows [27]:
Ca 5 ( PO 4 ) 3 F   +   10 HCl     3 H 3 PO 4 +   5 CaCl 2 +   HF ( g )
Ca 5 ( PO 4 ) 3 F   +   10 HNO 3   3 H 3 PO 4 +   5 Ca ( NO 3 ) 2 +   HF ( g )
2 RE 3 + +   Ca 5 ( PO 4 ) 3 F     ( 2 RE 3 + , 3 Ca 2 + ) [ PO 4 ] F   + 2 Ca 2 +
The four leaching agents were hydrochloric acid (HCl), nitric acid (HNO3), ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) and sodium chloride (NaCl). HCl and HNO3, both with an analytical purity, were purchased from Chongqing Chuandong Chemical (Group) Co., Ltd. (Chongqing, China); while the other reagents were obtained from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China).

2.4. Mathematical Method for Judging Independent Minerals

Independent minerals, concentrated state of elements, are particles larger than 0.001 mm in diameter and can be studied with naked eyes or under the microscope. There are two basic conditions for the formation of independent minerals [17]: one is relative stability under certain physical and chemical conditions; the other is certain element content. It is necessary to carry out mathematical analysis on the content of phosphorus and rare earth elements in the phosphate rock and calculate their mean value and mean variance. If the ratio of the mean value and mean variance of the two are significantly different (generally considered to be 20%), rare earth will exist in the form of independent mineral; otherwise, it will exist in a dispersed form such as homogeneity, adsorption, etc.
When a dependent variable, y, varies to some extent with an independent variable, x, it can be assumed that they have the following relationship: y   =   a   +   b x . According to the analysis in Table 1, we let y be the content of rare earth elements and x be the content of phosphorus pentoxide. The regression equation was established, and the coefficients a and b were obtained using Equations (4–8).
b   =   ( x i   x ¯ ) ( y i   y ¯ ) ( x i x ¯ ) 2
a   = y ¯   b x ¯
x ¯   =   1 N s a x i
s x   =   ( x i     x ¯ ) 2 N s a   1
s y =   ( y i     y ¯ ) 2 N s a   1
where y ¯ and x ¯ are the mean values of dependent variable y and independent variable x, respectively; s x and s y are the mean square deviation of x and y, respectively; N s a is total number of samples.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparion of Mineral Composition between Primary Weathered Phosphorites

All the samples are rich in CaO, P2O5 and SiO2 (Table 1). The L.O.I in primary phosphorite is higher than in weathered ore. Fluorapatite is present in both primary and weathered ores, with respective averages of 31.7% and 79.3% (Figure 1). Dolomite was detected only in primary ore with an average content of 48.75% (Figure 1 no. 1 and 2).

3.2. Ore Texture Differences

Figure 2 shows the distribution and textural characteristics of various minerals present in the ore. The composition of the various minerals was studied with a SEM equipped with an EDX detector (Figure 3) [28,29]. The results showed that fluorapatite, embedded in dolomitic matrix, is the main phosphorus-bearing mineral. Fluorapatite occurs in spherical, oolitic, and clastic forms, in mainly grey-yellow and grey-brown colors under transmitted light. Dolomite is the main cement in the rock and is colorless or white under plane parallel light. Dolomite also appears in the matrix of phosphorite as euhedral and subhedral isolated crystals and aggregate. Quartz was randomly distributed in the dolomite matrix, with a few crystals disseminated in phosphorite. It occurs as granular and hypidiomorphic grains with clean surfaces.

3.3. Comparison of Trace Elements

As shown in Table 1, the primary and weathered ores are enriched in Ba, Ce, La, Nd, Sr, and Y, and depleted in Co and Ni. Gallium, a chalcophile element related to hydrothermal activity [22], was enriched in the weathered ore and gradually depleted with the increase in temperature. Chromium, a siderophile element mainly found in ultrabasic and basic rocks, was also enriched in the weathered ore and mainly found in basic rocks and ultrabasic rocks.
U and Th are lithophile elements with similar geochemical properties, and they usually occur in oxides or oxygen-bearing salts [19]. U/Th values (see Table 1) of primary ore are lower than 1, while those of weathered ore are higher than 1, which indicates that hydrothermal precipitation has an effect on the later stage of primary ore, and weathered ore has obvious residual enrichment properties. The average Sr/Ba values (Table 1) of primary and weathered ores are all greater than 1 except for sample No.6, indicating that the phosphate rock is clastic in origin. The mean Rb/Cs values of primary ore and weathered ore were almost the same, indicating that these active lithophile elements were adsorbed or bound evenly in the minerals of the original rock. Both Zr and Hf are high field strength elements and indicate differences in hydrothermal action, the former was enriched at an early stage while the latter at a later stage. The Zr/Hf value of weathered ore was significantly smaller than that of primary ore, indicating that primary ore was related to the early hydrothermal activity while weathered ore was relevant to the later stage.

3.4. Comparison of Rare Earth Elements

As shown in Table 2, the content of total rare earth elements in weathered phosphate rock was higher than that in primary ore. Concentration of LREE is higher than that of HREE in both types of ore (average LREE/HREE ratio = 1.35, average (La/Yb)N ratio = 16.11), and δCe and δEu are obtained using Equations (9) and (10). Figure 4 shows negative Ce and Eu anomalies in primary and weathered ores, while La, Nd and Y are relatively enriched. The negative Ce anomaly indicates that there may be two situations: one is that the ore-forming environment of phosphate rock was oxidizing and Ce4+ with small ion radius was difficult to enter apatite lattice to form a loss; the other is that Ce4+ can easily form CeO2 which lead to loss during the reworking of phosphate rock in marine environment. The negative Eu anomalies indicate that magma was differentiated by a certain intensity of crystallization [14,15,16,17]. In summary, the characteristics of REE indicated that the phosphorite belongs to the normal marine sedimentary rock.
δCe = CeN/(LaN × PrN)0.5
δEu = EuN/(SmN × GdN)0.5

3.5. Analysis of Rare Earth Elements (REE) Occurrence State

3.5.1. Analysis of Independent Form

After calculation, the average values x ¯   =   25.7170 and   y ¯   =   0.1379 , the mean square errors s x   =   9.5433 and s y   =   0.0528 , and the regression equation y   =   0.0054 x     0.0019 were obtained. As a consequence, the values ( x ¯ y ¯ )   =   186.451 and ( s x s y )   =   180.747 were also acquired, and they differ by 3.06%, which is much less than 20%. Therefore, it is considered that the rare earth elements are unlikely to exist as an independent mineral [15,31,32].

3.5.2. Analysis of Isomorphic Form

Rare earth elements can either exist in the form of independent minerals or isomorphic substitution in the minerals’ lattices. If the REE exists in the form of a separate mineral such as monazite and xenotime, it is difficult to dissolve in the dilute acid, even in small amounts. If the rare earth elements exist in the crystal lattice of colloidal phosphate ore, their physicochemical properties should be similar, the rare earth elements can be completely dissolved in dilute acid together with the colloidal phosphate [31]. Therefore, under certain conditions, the fluorapatite in phosphorite can be dissolved by dilute acid, and the leaching rate of phosphorus and rare earth elements can be analyzed to study the deportment of rare earth elements [31].
The leaching process (see Equations (1)–(3)) was carried out using a magnetic stirrer at room temperature. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the leaching rates of phosphorus and rare earth are approximately the same. When the leaching rate reaches 99.98%, it no longer increases with increase of acid concentration, meaning they exist in the form of isomorphism. With the dissolution and lattice destruction of apatite, phosphorus and rare earth elements were transferred into the solution at the same time. The isomorphic substitution involves the replacement of Ca2+ in apatite by REE [31].

3.5.3. Analysis of Ion Adsorption Form

If rare earth elements are adsorbed on clays or other minerals, they (REE) can generally be leached out by inorganic salts [33,34,35]. In this experiment, a 5 g composite sample was leached with NH4Cl and NaCl for 2 h in 100 mL inorganic salts with different concentrations and the results are shown in Figure 6. The leaching rate of rare earth increases slowly with increasing concentration of inorganic salts until at 2.6%, which indicates a low amount of adsorbed REE. Taking into account experimental errors, its content is likely to be between 2% and 3% [33,34,35,36].

4. Conclusions

The weathering of primary phosphorite in southern China increases the concentration of P2O5, Fe2O3, and Al2O3, and decreases the MgO, CaO, and CO2 content. The concentration of trace elements including Ba, Ce, La, Nd, Sr, and Y was also increased, while the Co and Ni content was strongly depleted, indicating the inheritance from the original rocks. The U/Th ratios indicate that the primary ore was affected by hydrothermal imprint in the later stage of sedimentation, and the weathered ore was residually enriched in REE. Light rare earth elements are enriched relative to HREE in both primary and weathered ores, and Ce and Eu both have negative anomalies. The REE occurs mainly in fluorapatite crystal lattice and in isomorphic substitution with Ca, with only a small proportion (2–3%) adsorbed onto the mineral surface. Their ability to form separate minerals is low. The characteristics of rare earth elements indicated that the phosphorite deposits are normal marine sedimentary rocks.

Author Contributions

The contributions of the authors were as follows: conceptualization, J.Z. and S.L.; methodology, J.Z. and S.L.; validation, S.L., J.Z., H.W. and C.W.; investigation, J.Z. and S.L.; resources, J.Z. and S.L.; data curation, S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; visualization, S.L.; supervision, C.W.; project administration, J.Z.; funding acquisition, H.W.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the software and formal analysis provided by Aoshi Analytical Testing (Guangzhou, China) Co., Ltd.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51164004, and the APC was funded by Huaifa Wang.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abouzeid, A.Z.A. Physical and thermal treatment of phosphate ores—An overview. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2008, 85, 59–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. dos Santos, M.A.; Santana, R.C.; Capponi, F.; Ataide, C.H.; Barrozo, M.A.S. Effect of ionic species on the performance of apatite flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 76, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gharabaghi, M.; Irannajad, M.; Noaparast, M. A review of the beneficiation of calcareous phosphate ores using organic acid leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 103, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, Y. The Construction and Application of Phosphorus Resource Development and Utilization Model in China; Hefei University of Tecnology: Hefei, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, W.; Ma, W.; Zhang, F.; Ma, J. Comparative analysis of the superiority of China’s phophate rock and development strategies with that of the United States and Morocco. J. Nat. Resour. 2005, 20, 378–386. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, T.; Wen, S.; Tian, P.; Tang, Z.; Huang, Y. Weathered phosphorites in south China. Geol. Chem. Miner. 1996, 3, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, J. Study on Geology and Geochemistry of Wheathered Phosphate Deposits, South China; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, S.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Y.; He, J. Study status and trends of weathered phosphate rocks in Yunnan, Guizhou. Ind. Miner. Process. 2010, 39, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tian, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J. Fixed quantity exploration and assessment of weathered phosphoric ore in southwest of China. Geol. Chem. Miner. 2004, 4, 205–209. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wei, D.; Cui, X. Study on process characteristic of heavy rare earths in phosphorite in Guizhou province. Conserv. Util. Miner. Resour. 2003, 2, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, R.D.; Gao, H.; Wang, Q.; Bao, M. REE enrichment in Early Cambrian Gezhongwu formation phosphorous rock series in Sanjia, Zhijun County, Guizhou Province, China. J. Rare Earths 2005, 23, 760–767. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ross, J.; Gao, L.; Meouch, O.; Anthony, E.; Sutarwala, D.; Mamo, H. Carbonate Apatite Precipitation from Synthetic Municipal Wastewater. Minerals 2017, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salama, W.; Khirekesh, Z.; Amini, A.; Bafti, B.S. Diagenetic evolution of the upper Devonian phosphorites, Alborz for Mountain Range, northern Iran. Sediment. Geol. 2018, 376, 90–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, J.; Shun, C.; Yang, G.; Xie, F. Separation and enrichment of rare earth elements in phosphorite in Xinhua, Zhijin, Guizhou. J. Rare Earths 2006, 24, 413. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shi, C.; Hu, R.; Wang, G. Study on REE geochemistry of Zhijin phosphorites, Guizhou province. J. Mineral. Petrol. 2004, 24, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, M.; Sun, X.; Ma, M. Rare earth elements geochemistry and genesis of Xinhua large-size phosphorite deposit in western Guizhou. Miner. Depos. 2004, 23, 484–493. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jin, H.-X.; Wu, F.-Z.; Mao, X.-H.; Wang, M.-L.; Xie, H.-Y. Leaching isomorphism rare earths from phosphorite ore by sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid. Rare Met. 2017, 36, 840–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lednev, A.V.; Lozhkin, A.V. Remediation of agrosoddy-podzolic soils contaminated with cadmium. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 620–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Jin, H.; Chen, Y.; Mao, X. Rare earth elements in Zhijin phosphorite and distribution in two-stage flotation process. J. Rare Earths 2007, 25, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, J. The weathered ore criterion of Dianchi phosphorite. Yunnan Metall. 1992, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Hou, B.; Ye, J.; Mao, S.; Li, X. Flotation separation of quartz from collophane using an amine collector and its adsorption mechanisms. Powder Technol. 2017, 318, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, P.; He, Z.; Li, S.; Lash, G.G.; Li, B.; Huang, B.; Yan, D. Volcanic and hydrothermal activities recorded in phosphate nodules from the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation black shales in South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2018, 505, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huggett, J.; Hooker, J.N.; Cartwright, J. Very early diagenesis in a calcareous, organic-rich mudrock from Jordan. Arab. J. Geosci. 2017, 10, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Breiland, A.A.; Flood, B.E.; Nikrad, J.; Bakarich, J.; Husman, M.; Rhee, T.; Jones, R.S.; Bailey, J.V. Polyphosphate-Accumulating Bacteria: Potential Contributors to Mineral Dissolution in the Oral Cavity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.; Yang, R.; Wei, H.; Gao, J. Rare earth element geochemistry of Cambrian phosphorites from the Yangtze Region. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gamez Vintaned, J.A.; Linan, E.; Navarro, D.; Zhuravlev, A.Y. The oldest Cambrian skeletal fossils of Spain (Cadenas Ibericas, Aragon). Geol. Mag. 2018, 155, 1465–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Walawalkar, M.; Nichol, C.K.; Azimi, G. Process investigation of the acid leaching of rare earth elements from phosphogypsum using HCl, HNO3, and H2SO4. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 166, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Linsy, P.; Nath, B.N.; Mascarenhas-Pereira, M.B.L.; Vinitha, P.V.; Ray, D.; Babu, C.P. Benthic cycling of phosphorus in the Eastern Arabian Sea: Evidence of present day phosphogenesis. Mar. Chem. 2018, 199, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sinirkaya, M.; Ozer, A.K.; Gulaboglu, M.S. Kinetics of dissolution of Mardin-Mazidagi (Turkey) phosphate ore in dilute phosphoric acid solutions. Miner. Metall. Process. 2010, 27, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boynton, W.V. Cosmochemistry of the Rare Earth Elements. In Rare Earth Element Geochemistry; Henderson, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie, F.; Zhang, T.A.; Dreisinger, D.; Doyle, F. A critical review on solvent extraction of rare earths from aqueous solutions. Miner. Eng. 2014, 56, 10–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, D. REE geochemistry of the ore-bearing REE in Xinhua phosphorite, Zhijin, Guizhou. J. Mineral. Petrol. 2003, 23, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  33. Baghdady, A.R.; Howari, F.M.; Al-Wakeel, M.I. On the mineral characteristics and geochemistry of the Florida phosphate of Four Corners and Hardee County mines. Sediment. Geol. 2016, 342, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, J.; Yang, R.; Zhang, J. Mode of occurrence of rare earth elements in posphorite in Zhijin county, Guizhou province, China. Acta Mineral. Sin. 2010, 30, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gall, Q.; Davis, W.J.; Lowe, D.G.; Dabros, Q. Diagenetic apatite character and in situ ion microprobe U-Pb age, Keeseville Formation, Potsdam Group, New York State. Can. J. Earth Sci. 2017, 54, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, X.-W.; Long, Z.-Q.; Wang, L.-S.; Feng, Z.-Y. Technology development for rare earth cleaner hydrometallurgy in China. Rare Met. 2015, 34, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of studied phosphorite samples.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of studied phosphorite samples.
Minerals 09 00416 g001
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of phosphorite. (a) no.1 crossed nicols. (b) no.1 perpendicular polarized light. (c) no.2 plane polarized light. (d) no.2 crossed nicols. (e) no.4 plane polarized light. (f) no.4 crossed nicols. (g) no.5 plane polarized light. (h) no.5 crossed nicols.
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of phosphorite. (a) no.1 crossed nicols. (b) no.1 perpendicular polarized light. (c) no.2 plane polarized light. (d) no.2 crossed nicols. (e) no.4 plane polarized light. (f) no.4 crossed nicols. (g) no.5 plane polarized light. (h) no.5 crossed nicols.
Minerals 09 00416 g002aMinerals 09 00416 g002b
Figure 3. SEM-EDX results of samples. (a,b) no.1; (c,d) no.4.
Figure 3. SEM-EDX results of samples. (a,b) no.1; (c,d) no.4.
Minerals 09 00416 g003aMinerals 09 00416 g003b
Figure 4. Normalized rare earth elements (REE) patterns of phosphorite samples (after Boynton, 1984 [30]).
Figure 4. Normalized rare earth elements (REE) patterns of phosphorite samples (after Boynton, 1984 [30]).
Minerals 09 00416 g004
Figure 5. Results of acid leaching test. (a) HCl leaching test; (b)HNO3 leaching test.
Figure 5. Results of acid leaching test. (a) HCl leaching test; (b)HNO3 leaching test.
Minerals 09 00416 g005
Figure 6. Results of inorganic salts leaching test.
Figure 6. Results of inorganic salts leaching test.
Minerals 09 00416 g006
Table 1. Major oxides (%) and trace elements(ppm) of the studied phosphorite samples.
Table 1. Major oxides (%) and trace elements(ppm) of the studied phosphorite samples.
OxidesPhosphorite
PrimaryWeathered
Sample No.
123456
P2O519.36 9.42 30.12 29.21 31.01 35.18
SiO213.61 24.95 17.59 18.29 17.69 10.15
Al2O31.57 1.71 4.25 4.75 2.91 2.23
Fe2O30.99 0.95 3.28 3.49 2.74 1.98
CaO35.75 26.98 38.73 37.59 39.51 44.72
MgO7.79 10.36 0.55 0.61 0.54 0.27
Na2O0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.09
K2O0.42 0.53 1.13 1.27 0.90 0.57
TiO20.08 0.05 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.11
L.O.I18.5023.703.904.063.332.78
Total98.13 98.72 99.75 99.48 98.81 98.08
Trace Elements (ppm)
Ba183 3200 433 479 732 455
Ce142 78 247 232 210 272
Cr20 20 40 40 50 40
Cs1 1 2 2 2 1
Dy27 14 46 44 42 53
Er15 8 26 25 24 29
Eu6 4 10 10 13 14
Ga4 3 9 10 7 6
Gd34 18 58 55 53 69
Hf1 1 2 2 1 2
Ho6 3 10 9 9 11
La207 103 370 353 288 406
Lu1 1 2 2 2 2
Nb2 2 4 4 2 2
Nd150 81 258 241 227 307
Pr35 19 62 58 52 72
Rb9 8 27 28 19 14
Sm27 14 45 42 41 54
Sn1 1 1 1 1 1
Sr679 335 677 722 698 1305
Tb5 2 8 7 7 9
Th7 5 9 9 5 9
Tm2 1 3 3 3 3
U5 3 10 9 18 11
V19 8 33 32 72 24
W2 2 2 2 1 3
Y317 166 566 538 518 602
Yb8 5 14 14 13 16
Zr49 37 74 66 44 54
U/Th0.64 0.57 1.03 1.01 3.55 1.11
Sr/Ba3.72 0.10 1.56 1.51 0.95 2.87
Rb/Cs14.92 10.25 15.46 14.71 10.32 16.63
Zr/Hf37.69 37.00 35.24 31.43 33.85 31.76
Table 2. Rare earth elements(ppm) of phosphorite.
Table 2. Rare earth elements(ppm) of phosphorite.
REEPrimary PhosphoriteWeathered Phosphorite
Sample No.
123456
La207102.5370353288406
Ce14278.3247232210272
Pr35.419.161.658.15272.1
Nd149.580.6258241227307
Sm26.614.545.442.241.154.3
Eu6.343.6510.459.8912.614
Gd33.818.4557.654.852.869.1
Tb4.552.487.787.357.029.05
Dy2714.346.243.741.753
Ho5.633.049.869.33911.25
Er14.658.052624.723.729.1
Tm1.710.972.982.852.693.28
Yb8.434.7614.3513.7512.816.25
Lu1.130.671.871.811.652.08
Y317165.5566538518602
ΣREE980.74516.821725.091632.481500.061920.51
LREE566.84298.6992.45936.19830.71125.4
HREE413.9218.22732.64696.29669.36795.11
LREE/HREE1.371.371.351.341.241.42
(La/Yb)N16.3714.3617.1917.121516.66
δEu0.640.680.620.630.820.70
δCe0.360.390.350.350.380.35

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, C. Geochemical Characteristics of Dolomitic Phosphorite Containing Rare Earth Elements and Its Weathered Ore. Minerals 2019, 9, 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070416

AMA Style

Li S, Zhang J, Wang H, Wang C. Geochemical Characteristics of Dolomitic Phosphorite Containing Rare Earth Elements and Its Weathered Ore. Minerals. 2019; 9(7):416. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shuai, Jie Zhang, Huaifa Wang, and Caili Wang. 2019. "Geochemical Characteristics of Dolomitic Phosphorite Containing Rare Earth Elements and Its Weathered Ore" Minerals 9, no. 7: 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9070416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop