Next Article in Journal
Selective Mineralization and Recovery of Au(III) from Multi-Ionic Aqueous Systems by Bacillus licheniformis FZUL-63
Next Article in Special Issue
Geochemical Characteristics of Dolomitic Phosphorite Containing Rare Earth Elements and Its Weathered Ore
Previous Article in Journal
Enigmatic Alluvial Sapphires from the Orosmayo Region, Jujuy Province, Northwest Argentina: Insights into Their Origin from in situ Oxygen Isotopes
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review on Comprehensive Utilization of Red Mud and Prospect Analysis
Open AccessArticle

A Comparative Study of Different Columns Sizes for Ultrafine Apatite Flotation

Centro de Tecnologia Mineral (CETEM/MCTI), Rio de Janeiro 21941-908, Brazil
Copebras—China Molybdenum Company Ltd (CMOC International Brasil), Ouvidor (GO) 75715-000, Brazil
Centro de Tecnologia Mineral (CETEM/MCTIC), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90040-060, Brazil
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(7), 391;
Received: 19 April 2019 / Revised: 7 June 2019 / Accepted: 21 June 2019 / Published: 28 June 2019
The desliming operation to discharge ultrafine particles less than 20 µm prior to concentration by flotation is a common practice in phosphate ores beneficiation plants. The first industrial application for the beneficiation of the phosphate material with particle sizes <44 µm in Brazil was in the Araxá plant concentrator in the beginning of the 1980s. This work shows the comparative flotation results with two different phosphate slime samples (<40 µm) obtained from the Copebras (CMOC International) industrial plant located in Catalão (Goiás state, Brazil), considering a circuit with rougher/cleaner configuration with different columns sizes, as follows: Circuit 1 (rougher—4” diameter column; cleaner—2” diameter column) and circuit 2 (rougher—6” diameter column; cleaner 4” column). The results indicate that better flotation apatite recovery results were achieved for the circuit with higher size columns (6” and 4”). The results can be explained by the application of a cavitation tube in the rougher stage in the 6” column. The improved flotation performance can be attributed to increased probabilities of collision and attachment and the reduced probability of detachment by the small size bubbles generated by the cavitation tube in comparison with the bubbles produced by the porous tube of the 4” column flotation. View Full-Text
Keywords: apatite; flotation; column flotation; slimes apatite; flotation; column flotation; slimes
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Matiolo, E.; Couto, H.J.B.; de Lira Teixeira, M.F.; de Almeida, R.N.; de Freitas, A.S. A Comparative Study of Different Columns Sizes for Ultrafine Apatite Flotation. Minerals 2019, 9, 391.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop