Next Article in Journal
Pore Connectivity Characterization of Lacustrine Shales in Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin, China: Insights into the Effects of Mineral Compositions on Connected Pores
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Sodium Alginate on Chlorite and Serpentine in Chalcopyrite Flotation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transformation of Vanadium-Bearing Titanomagnetite Concentrate in Additive-Free Roasting and Alkaline-Pressure Leaching for Extracting Vanadium (V)

1
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Baosteel Zhanjiang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Zhanjiang 524072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(3), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030197
Submission received: 24 February 2019 / Revised: 19 March 2019 / Accepted: 21 March 2019 / Published: 26 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
With a view to satisfying the requirements of environmental protest and efficient usage of resources, a novel process for efficiently extracting vanadium (V), titanium (Ti), and iron (Fe) from vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate was developed. In the new process, vanadium is pre-extracted by additive-free roasting under the air atmosphere and alkaline leaching technologies. In this paper, transformation of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate in the roasting is investigated based on thermodynamic analyses and experimental discussion. Thermodynamic analyses show that oxidation of V(III) into V(V) would happen in the roasting experiment over the range of 327–1327 °C and vanadium-iron spinel phase (FeV2O4) can be oxidized more easily than magnetite (Fe3O4) when the temperature is higher than 861 °C. Experimental results show that some compounds (V2O5, Fe2Al4Si5O18, and Fe2SiO4) with low melting temperature were obtained by solid reactions at low temperature and melted as a binding phase at elevated temperature. Liquids were generated due to some chemical reactions or phase transformation reaction (Fe2V2O4(s) → Fe2O3(s) + liquid) at elevated temperature. Main phases of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 are connected and sintered with the binding phases of the compounds with low melting temperature or the mixtures with low liquidus temperature. In addition, higher roasting temperature leads to higher vanadium leaching efficiency over the range of 800–1200 °C. However, over-burning would happen at 1250 °C, some of vanadium oxide was wrapped by silicate network, and the conversion of V(III) into V(V) was prevented from occurring. Therefore, the vanadium leaching efficiency decreased from 59.1% (Troa. = 1200 °C) to 57% (Troa. = 1250 °C).

1. Introduction

Vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite is a very important mineral resource of vanadium, titanium and iron. Currently, the major process for smelting vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite involves firstly extracting iron and then extracting vanadium of slag by sodium salt roasting and water leaching technologies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8], which causes serious environmental pollution (especially hazardous gases, such as HCl, SO2, or Cl2) and low recovery ratio of vanadium (total recovery ratio < 45%) and titanium (total recovery ratio < 10%) [8]. In addition, soluble vanadium (V(IV) and V(V)) substances are toxic substances and vanadium-rich resources are a potential toxic solid because deleterious health effects induced by inorganic vanadium compounds have been reported [9,10]. Therefore, more attention has been drawn to comprehensive and efficient extraction of valuable elements (V, Ti, and Fe) from titanomagnetite deposits with a new environmentally-friendly method.
Regarding the extraction of vanadium from vanadium-bearing resources (such as vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite, vanadium-rich slag, stone coal) many efforts have been made by researchers [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. A calcium roasting method followed by acid or alkaline leaching was an alternative process to extract vanadium with the purpose of avoiding harmful gas generation (such as HCl, SO2, or Cl2), but it always results in low quality vanadium products (V2O5 94% < 98% of high quality) and high acid leaching [11]. Direct acid leaching method without roasting attracted more attention as it has no exhaust gas generation, but it also has the problems of low leaching efficiency (74%) of vanadium and usage of excess leaching agent [12].
Based on the abovementioned background, a novel process for extracting vanadium, titanium, and iron from vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate was developed. The proposed new process involves three parts: (1) pre-extracting vanadium from vanadium-bearing resources by additive-free roasting under the air atmosphere and alkaline-pressure leaching technologies; (2) reducing the vanadium-free pellets after roasting for producing direct reduction iron (DRI); (3) separating the DRI from titano-rich slag, which can be used as the alternative of raw material for the production of titanium oxide or titanium smelting process. The advantages of this process are that it is possible to utilize vanadium-bearing resources rationally and recover vanadium, iron, and titanium efficiently; moreover, it is a simple, relatively fast, semi-continuous, easy to scale-up, and environmental-friendly process because it has no additive usage compared with the traditional process. Thus, it is beneficial to achieving sustainable development. This paper focuses on discussing the transformation of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate in the roasting process.

2. Thermodynamic Criteria for Roasting

Usually, V as the form of V(III) solutes into iron oxide in the form of isomorphism instead of Fe(III) in Fe3O4 because the radius of V(III) is close to the radius of Fe(III) (RV(III) = 0.65 Å ≈ RFe(III) = 0.67 Å), vanadium in the ore or slag is therefore considered as the form of vanadium-iron spinel (FeV2O4 or FeO∙V2O3) [28,29]. Furthermore, it is noted that the suboxide of vanadium (V(III), V(IV)) is hardly soluble into acid, neutral or alkaline solutions [30], therefore, it is required to change the suboxide (V(III), V(IV)) into V(V), which is soluble in alkaline solutions, in order to extract vanadium from the ore. Therefore, the reactions in the roasting, which are essential to vanadium extraction, are discussed from thermodynamic viewpoints.
While discussing the thermodynamic properties of the Fe-Ti-V-O system at elevated temperatures, it is essential to consider the existence of complex oxides, such as FeTixOy, and FeVxOy. The Gibbs energy changes of the following reactions are not large compared to those of the redox reactions in the related systems as shown in Figure 1 [31].
FeO (s) + TiO2 (s) = FeTiO3 (s)
ΔG°r = −10.987 kJ/mol at 1100 K
FeO (s) + V2O3 (s) = FeV2O4 (s)
ΔG°r = −13.204 kJ/mol at 1100 K
Furthermore, when the activity of FeOx decreases due to the formation of complex oxides, the activity of TiO2 and V2O3 decreases by almost the same magnitude. In order to facilitate a simple discussion, FeTixOy and FeVxOy are therefore considered to be the mixtures of TiOx + FeOx and VOx + FeOx respectively and vice versa. In Figure 1, Fe2TiO5 (Fe2O3∙TiO2) and Fe2V2O8 (Fe2O3∙V2O5) are considered to be the mixtures of TiO2 + Fe2O3 and V2O5 + Fe2O3 respectively.
Figure 1 shows the relationship between standard Gibbs free energy of some Reactions (3)–(8) [31,32] listed below and temperature. As shown in Figure 1, ΔG° of oxidation Reactions (3)–(8) [31,32] over the range of 327–1327 °C (600–1600 K) are lower than zero and the oxidation reactions are spontaneous from left to right. When the temperature is higher than 861 °C (TCross = 1134 K, the temperature at black cross point in Figure 1), vanadium-iron spinel phase (FeV2O4) can be oxidized more easily than magnetite (Fe3O4) from the view of thermodynamic analysis. Thus, the experiment temperature is set at 800 °C or higher in this study in order to ensure all the suboxide of vanadium (mainly V2O3) can be oxidized into V2O5, which can be dissolved easier than V2O3 into alkaline solution.
4Fe3O4 (s) + O2 (g) = 6Fe2O3 (s)
V2O3 (s) + O2 (g) = V2O5 (s), T < 943 K
V2O3 (s) + O2 (g) = V2O5 (l), T > 943 K
2/3FeV2O4 (s) + 2/3FeO (s) + O2 = 2/3Fe2V2O8(s), T < 1113 K
2/3FeV2O4 (s) + 2/3FeO (s) + O2 = 2/3Fe2O3 (s) + 2/3V2O5 (l), T > 1113 K
2FeTiO3(s) + 2FeO(s) + O2(g) = 2Fe2TiO5(s)

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Raw Materials

Vanadium-bearing titanomaginetite concentrate used as the raw material in this study is provided from a steel factory of China and its composition by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry analysis (XRF, Rigaku ZSX Primus II) is shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, contents of vanadium and calcium in the ore are low. Low CaO is beneficial to the leaching of vanadium because calcium vanadate (xCaO∙V2O5, x = 1, 2, 3) would be generated via the reaction of CaO with V2O5 and it is water-insoluble [30,33] which leads to a reduction in vanadium extraction.

3.2. Experimental

Vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate from the factory cannot be used directly because it is damp. As a result, the ore needs to be dried for a few hours. In a typical experiment, the ground ore (−74 μm) without free water was subjected to oxidative roasting in air (partial pressure of oxygen is 0.021 MPa (0.21 atm)) without additives in a muffle furnace over the range of 800–1250 °C for 2 h. After roasting, the ore was cooled in the atmosphere and ground into the target particle size (−74 μm) for leaching or related analyses. The leaching conditions are 250 °C for 4 h in a sealed reactor with high pressure (1.3 MPa) and stirring of 300 r/min, 3:1 of the ratio of liquor to solid, and 100 g/L NaOH as leaching agent. After leaching, the residues are separated from leach liquor with suction device and cleaned with distilled water for three times. Finally, the residues are weighed and subjected to analysis.
Related analyses used in this study are chemical analysis, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry analysis (XRF, Rigaku ZSX Primus II, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical X Pertpro, PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis (SEM-EDS, Shimadzu SSX-550, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo Japan), and thermal gravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry analysis (TG-DSC, Netzsch STA449 F3, Netzsch Group, Selb, Germany).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Mineral Analysis

As shown in Figure 2, the phases in the ore are magnetite (Fe3O4) and ilmenite (FeO·TiO2), which agrees with the analysis in Table 2. Other compositions cannot be found in the XRD pattern due to their low contents. Figure 3a shows that there are three different regions (point 1: white region, point 2: light grey region, and point 3: grey region). It is found that the compositions by EDS analyses in the ore are iron and titanium oxides (points 1 and 2 in Figure 3a) as shown in Figure 3b,c, vanadium oxides associated with iron and titanium oxides (point 1 in Figure 3a) as shown in Figure 3a, and magnesium, aluminum, and silicon oxides (point 3 in Figure 3a) as shown in Figure 3d. The EDS results agree with XRF analysis in Table 2 and XRD analysis in Figure 2.

4.2. TG-DSC Analysis

The TG-DSC analysis for vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite was conducted in order to investigate the physicochemical behavior during the roasting process. Figure 4 is the TG-DSC analysis of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite under the air atmosphere.
There are two stages of weight loss (stage 1 and stage 4), one stage of no change in weight (stage 2), and one stage of weight increase (stage 3) as shown in Figure 4. Weight change in TG is −1.1% from room temperature to 140 °C. Corresponding to the stage 1 of TG, an endothermic peak in DSC appears and is caused by the evaporation of absorbed water (mass loss) in the ore. From 140 °C to 320 °C (stage 2), escape of crystal water accompanying mass loss and endothermic process and the oxidation of some oxides accompanying mass increase and exothermic process happened. Therefore, TG-DSC shows no change in weight and endothermic process due to the coupling effect of evaporation of crystal water (mass loss) and the oxidation of some low valent oxides, such as the oxides of V(III), Fe(II), Mn(II), in the ore (mass increase). Weight change in TG is +2.2% at the stage 3 from 320 °C to 920 °C. There is an exothermic trough corresponding to the stage 3, which is caused by the oxidation of suboxide, such as Fe(II) or V(III), in the ore. Weight change in TG is −1.8% at the stage 4 from 920 °C to 1200 °C and there is an endothermic peak corresponding to the stage 4, which is considered as the contribution of the mineral melt, the evaporation of liquid, such as V2O5 with low melting temperature (TMet. = 670 °C = 943 K [31]) and V2O5-Fe2O3 binary system (mol fraction of Fe2O3 < 0.5) with low liquidus temperature [32], and the decomposition of high valent manganese oxide (such as MnO2) with the following Reaction (9) [31,34,35].
4MnO2 (s) = 2Mn2O3 (s) + O2 (g)
TDec. = 460 °C, TBoi. = 550 °C;
ΔG°r = −74.028 kJ/mol, ΔG°r = −75.890 kJ/mol at 1100 K (Extrapolated data);
ΔH°r = 149.026 kJ/mol, ΔH°r = 166.00 kJ/mol at 1100 K (Extrapolated data)

4.3. Vanadium Loss and Vanadium Leaching Efficiency

As the abovementioned analyses, roasting temperature is important for the interaction reactions among the compounds in the ore and transformation process in roasting is significant for the vanadium leaching efficiency in the subsequent leaching process. In order to clear the transformation of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate in the roasting, the experimental conditions in this study are set at 800 °C, 900 °C, 1000 °C, 1100 °C, 1200 °C, or 1250 °C of roasting temperature respectively, 2 h of roasting time, −74 μm of particle size, 250 °C of leaching temperature with high pressure of 1.3 MPa, 4 h of leaching time, 3:1 of the ratio of liquor to solid, and 100 g/L NaOH as leaching agent.
Vanadium compounds will evaporate at elevated temperature and this will cause a loss of vanadium, mass change −1.8%, as shown in Figure 4 and reduce the recovery ratio of vanadium. Therefore, vanadium loss defined as Formula (10) is related to roasting temperature.
η = ( 1 m 2 β m 1 α ) × 100 %
where η—vanadium loss, %; m1—mass of the sample before roasting, g; m2—mass of the sample after roasting, g; α—vanadium content in the sample before roasting, %; β—vanadium content in the sample after roasting, %.
The detail data on masses and vanadium contents of the samples before and after roasting for calculating vanadium loss are shown in Table 2. Figure 5 shows the relationship of vanadium loss with roasting temperature. As shown in Figure 5, vanadium loss is not high and lower than 20% in general. Vanadium loss increases with the increase of temperature because the evaporation of vanadium compounds at elevated temperature is high. The trend of increase of vanadium loss is obvious when roasting temperature is higher than 1000 °C, which is in agreement with the TG-DSC analysis. Therefore, roasting of the ore is necessary and low roasting temperature is required for reducing vanadium loss to satisfy the high demand.
Leaching efficiency was introduced as an index for evaluating the roasting and leaching processes and defined as Formula (11), which indicates that higher conversion ratio of V(III) into V(V) leads to higher vanadium leaching efficiency and vice versa when leaching conditions are same.
γ = ( 1 m 4 φ m 3 ψ ) × 100 %
where γ—vanadium leaching efficiency, %; m3—mass of sample before leaching, g; m4—mass of residue after leaching, g; ψ—vanadium content in the sample before leaching, %; φ—vanadium content of residue after leaching, %.
The detail data on masses and vanadium contents of the samples before and after leaching for calculating vanadium leaching efficiency are shown in Table 3. Figure 6 shows the relationship of vanadium leaching efficiency with roasting temperature. As shown in Figure 6, vanadium leaching efficiency increases with the increase of temperature, when roasting temperature is lower than 1200 °C. This indicates that conversion ratio of V(III) into V(V) increases with the increase of temperature when the roasting temperature is lower than 1200 °C. The vanadium leaching efficiency is 59.1% at 1200 °C for 2 h under the air atmosphere (particle size: −74 μm) and it indicates that the novel process is feasible. However, the vanadium leaching efficiency decreases when the roasting temperature is above 1200 °C. The reason for the reduction in leaching efficiency at 1250 °C of roasting temperature will be discussed by XRD and SEM-EDS analyses at subsequent discussion on transformation of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite in roasting.

4.4. Transformation Reactions Analyses in Roasting

In order to clear the transformation reactions, the samples before and after roasting were analyzed by XRD, as shown in Figure 7. Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 (Fe2O3∙TiO2) were detected in the samples after roasting, which is attributed that Fe3O4 and FeTiO3 (FeO∙TiO2) were oxidized respectively in the atmosphere as shown by the Reactions (3) and (8) [31] in Figure 1. Figure 7 shows that there was a little Fe3O4 in the sample due to its inadequate oxidation at 800 °C (Figure 7b), but all of Fe(II) were oxidized into Fe(III) (Fe2O3) at 1000 °C or higher temperature (Figure 7c–e). Furthermore, it is found that there was no vanadium oxide in Figure 7 because the amounts of vanadium oxides, usually considered as the form of FeO∙V2O3, in the ores are small (<0.8%). However, the oxidizations of V2O3 (Reaction (12) [31]) and FeO∙V2O3 (Reaction (13) [31]) is easier than that of Fe3O4 (Reaction (14) [31]) based on thermodynamic analysis (shown in Figure 1 and listed below) when the roasting temperature is higher than 1134 K, so oxidization of V2O3 would happen during the roasting experiment if there were Fe2O3 in the ore, i.e., Reactions (12) and (13) [31] would happen in the roasting, although the related compounds (V2O5) were not found in Figure 7.
V2O3 (s) + O2 (g) = V2O5 (l)
ΔG°r = −137.521 kJ/mol O2 at 1300 K
2/3FeO·V2O3 (s) + 2/3FeO (s) + O2 (g) = 2/3Fe2O3 (s)+ 2/3V2O5 (l)
ΔG°r = −156.521 kJ/mol O2 at 1300 K
4Fe3O4 (s) + O2 (g) = 6Fe2O3 (s)
ΔG°r = −108.968 kJ/mol O2 at 1300 K
The samples before and after roasting were subjected to SEM-EDS analysis. Figure 8 shows microphotographs of the samples before and after experiments at different roasting temperatures. As shown in Figure 8a,b, there were no obvious changes for the samples before and after experiments at 800 °C. However, some solids react at low temperature, according to Reactions (3)–(8) [31,32] as evident from Figure 1, and crystal bridges, which can connect the neighboring particles with different compositions together, are generated between the solid compositions at lower temperature. Melting on the surface of particles happened when roasting temperature is higher than 1000 °C (Figure 8c,d), which is endothermic and agrees with the results of TG-DSC (Figure 4). Figure 8d shows that melting of the ore particle was more obvious and ore particles become bigger at 1200 °C than those in Figure 8c at 1000 °C. The melting on the surface is considered that compounds with low melting temperature, such as vanadium pentaoxide (V2O5, TMel. = 670 °C [31,32]), iron cordierite (Fe2Al4Si5O18, TMel. = 1083 °C [32]) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4, TMel. = 1205 °C [32]), were generated at low temperature as shown by Reactions (15) [31], (16) [31,32], (18) [32], and (19) [31] respectively and melt at elevated temperature. In addition, liquids would be generated because some chemical reactions or phase transformation reaction happened at elevated temperature as shown by Reactions (17) [31,32] and (20) [32]. Furthermore, the addition of other components can decrease the liquidus temperature of mixtures to some extent. For example, the liquidus temperature of mixture of (Fe2SiO4 + Al2O3) with a composition near to Fe2SiO4 is lower than 1205 °C, the melting temperature of Fe2SiO4, based on the phase diagram analysis. Although there is no ΔG°r data on Reaction (18) for justifying the reaction, FeO-SiO2-Al2O3 ternary phase diagram [32] and Figure 9 both show that there is Fe2Al4Si5O18 in the system, which indicates that Reaction (18) [32] would happen in the roasting. Therefore, main phases of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 were connected and sintered with crystal bridges and the binding phases of the compounds with low melting temperature. In fact, the generation of the compounds with low melting temperature is beneficial to the oxidation of V(III) into V(V) because vanadium oxide and oxygen transport easily in liquid. This is also the reason that high temperature roasting is in favor of the vanadium extraction, i.e., conversion ratio of V(III) into V(V) increases with the increase of temperature which finally leads to the increase of vanadium leaching efficiency as shown in Figure 6. Another reason why high temperature is beneficial to vanadium extraction is the decomposition of complex compounds at elevated temperature and recrystallization at low temperature, after breaking the structure of vanadium spinel.
V2O3 (s) + O2 (g) = V2O5 (s)
ΔG°r = −178.176 kJ/mol O2 at 900 K
2/3FeV2O4 (s) + 2/3FeO (s) + O2 (g) = 2/3Fe2V2O8 (s), T < 1113 K (840 °C)
ΔG°r = −215.877 kJ/mol O2 at 900 K, ΔG°r = −184.979 kJ/mol O2 at 1100 K
2/3FeV2O4 (s) + 2/3FeO (s) + O2 (g) = 2/3Fe2O3 (s) + 2/3V2O5 (l), T > 1113 K (840 °C)
ΔG°r = −128.231 kJ/mol O2 at 1300 K
2FeO (s) + 5SiO2 (s)+ 2Al2O3 (s) = Fe2Al4Si5O18 (l), T > 1356 K (1083 °C)
2FeO (s) + SiO2 (s) = Fe2SiO4 (s)
ΔG°r = −6.221 kJ/mol at 900 K, ΔG°r = −1.044 kJ/mol at 1100 K
Fe2V2O4 (s) → Fe2O3 (s) + liquid (Fe2O3 + V2O5) at TDec. = 1113 K (840 °C)
It is noted that over high temperature (>1200 °C) can cause a decrease in the vanadium leaching efficiency as shown in Figure 6. This result can be explained using the SEM-EDS analysis of the roasted product at 1250 °C shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9a shows that sinter of the ore particle is significant and there are some of white aggregations on the surface of the ore particle, which is called as over-burning. Based on the analysis of EDS (Figure 9b), the white aggregations are the complex compounds of Fe, Ti, V, and O. The particle size is larger than the original size because high temperature would accelerate the melting, aggregation, and sinter of silicate which causes some of the vanadium wrapped by molten silicate, called a silicate network, prevents the conversion of V(III) into V(V), and finally decreases the vanadium leaching efficiency. Figure 9c,d indicate that the complex compounds of Fe, Si, Mg, Al, and O are generated and it agrees with the Reaction (18) and FeO-SiO2-Al2O3 ternary phase diagram [32].
The schematic diagrams of transformation behavior of the samples are shown in Figure 10. Figure 10a is the schematic diagram for Figure 8a in which the outline of the samples before roasting is straight and sharp. Figure 10b is for Figure 8b–d in which the crystal bridges obtained by the reactions among solid compounds and some of binding phases generated connect the neighboring particles and thus the outline become blunt. Figure 10c is the equivalent for Figure 9a.
Based on the abovementioned analyses, the proposed process by additive-free roasting-alkaline leaching is successful. The roasting of the ore is necessary for improving the leaching efficiency and roasting at 1200 °C for 2 h under the air atmosphere is appropriate to minimize vanadium loss and reduce energy consumption by 3.6% compared with roasting at 1250 °C for 2 h (based on laboratory conditions).

5. Conclusions

Transformation of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate in the roasting (over the range of 800–1250 °C) was discussed based on thermodynamic analyses and experimental results. Some conclusions are achieved as follows.
  • Thermodynamic analyses show that oxidation of V2O3 would happen in the roasting experiment over the range of 327–1327 °C and vanadium-iron spinel phase (FeV2O4) can be oxidized more easily than magnetite (Fe3O4) when the temperature is higher than 861 °C.
  • The compounds (V2O5, Fe2Al4Si5O18, and Fe2SiO4) with low melting temperature were generated at low temperature and melted at elevated temperature; liquids were generated due to some chemical reactions or phase transformation reaction (Fe2V2O4(s) → Fe2O3(s) + liquid) happened at elevated temperature; main phases of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 are connected and sintered with the binding phases of the compounds with low melting temperature or the mixtures with low liquidus temperature.
  • Higher roasting temperature is beneficial for improving the vanadium leaching efficiency. However, over-burning causes some vanadium oxide wrapped by silicate network and reductions in the vanadium leaching efficiency from 59.1% at Troa. = 1200 °C to 57% at Troa. = 1250 °C (250 °C of leaching temperature with high pressure of 1.3 MPa, 4 h of leaching time, 3:1 of the ratio of liquor to solid, and 100 g/L NaOH as leaching agent).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z.; methodology, investigation, and analysis, H.Z. and W.Z.; data curation Y.G.; revision, Q.G.; supervision and suggestion, F.S.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC 51774071 and NSFC 51604069) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N182504008).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to X.J. and G.W., and X.H. in Northeastern University of China for valuable discussions and the supply of samples throughout this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hilliard, H. Minerals Yearbook; United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 1259–1278.
  2. Hilliard, H. The Materials Flow of Vanadium in the United States; Information Circular 9409; United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 1–20.
  3. Liao, S.; Bai, T. Vanadium Metallurgy in Foreign; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 1985; pp. 161–222. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moskalyk, R.R.; Alfantazi, A.M. Processing of vanadium: A review. Miner. Eng. 2003, 16, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Du, H. Principle of Blast Furnace Smelting Vanadium-Bearing Titanomagnetite; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1996; pp. 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hukkanen, E.; Walden, H. The production of vanadium and steel from titanomagnetites. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1985, 15, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deng, J.; Xue, X.; Liu, G. Current situation and development of comprehensive utilization of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite at Pangang. J. Mater. Metall. 2007, 6, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zheng, H.; Sun, Y.; Lu, J.; Dong, J.; Zhang, W.; Sheng, F. Vanadium extraction from vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite by selective chlorination using chloride wastes (FeClX). J. Cent. South Univ. 2017, 24, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zwolak, I. Vanadium carcinogenic, immunotoxic and neurotoxic effects: A review of in vitro studies. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2014, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boulassel, B.; Sadeg, N.; Roussel, O.; Perrin, M.; Belhadj-Tahar, H. Fatal poisoning by vanadium. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 206, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, H.; Xia, Q.; Wang, Y.; Pan, P.; Luo, D. The progress in production technology of vanadium pentoxide. J. Panzhihua Sci. Technol. 1996, 2, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Bao, S.; Liu, T.; Chen, T.; Huang, J. The technology of extracting vanadium from stone coal in China: History, current status and future prospects. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, L.; Wang, L.; Qi, T.; Chen, D.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Y. A novel method to extract iron, titanium, vanadium, and chromium from high-chromium vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrates. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 149, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, M.; Du, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Dreisinger, D.B.; Zhang, Z. Extraction of vanadium from vanadium slag via non-salt roasting and ammonium oxalate leaching. JOM 2017, 69, 1970–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cai, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Huang, J. Vanadium extraction from refractory stone coal using novel composite additive. JOM 2015, 67, 2629–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, R.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Xu, C. Efficient extraction of vanadium from vanadium-titanium magnetite concentrate by potassium salt roasting additives. Minerals 2018, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Xie, B.; Wang, G.; Li, X. Oxidation process of low-grade vanadium slag in presence of Na2CO3. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 1860–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takahashi, H.; Fujiwara, W.; Sun, H.; Yoshida, T.; Matsushima, Y. Extraction of vanadium from ammonia slag under near-atmospheric conditions. Metals 2018, 8, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, X.; Li, W.; Guan, X. Vanadium extraction from titano-magnetite by hydrofluoric acid. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 157, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiang, J.; Huang, Q.; Lv, X.; Bai, C. Extraction of vanadium from converter slag by two-step sulfuric acid leaching process. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 170, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, D.; Zhao, H.; Hu, G.; Qi, T.; Yu, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, L.; Wang, W. An extraction process to recover vanadium from low-grade vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 294, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ji, Y.; Shen, S.; Liu, J.; Xue, Y. Cleaner and effective process for extracting vanadium from vanadium slag by using an innovative three-phase roasting reaction. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 149, 1068–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, H.; Fang, H.; Wang, K.; Zhou, W.; Yang, Z.; Yan, X.; Ge, W.; Li, Q.; Xie, B. Asynchronous extraction of vanadium and chromium from vanadium slag by stepwise sodium roasting-water leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 156, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H.; Wang, K.; Hua, W.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Xie, B. Selective leaching of vanadium in calcification-roasted vanadium slag by ammonium carbonate. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 160, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; David, D.; Lv, G.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y. Extraction of vanadium from direct acid leach solution of converter vanadium slag. Can. Metall. Q. 2017, 56, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luo, X.; Dong, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y. Study on the sodium oxidation properties of low-iron vanadium-titanium magnetite with high vanadium and titanium. Energy Sources 2018, 40, 1998–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Yi, L.; Wang, L.; Chen, D.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Qi, T. A novel process for the recovery of iron, titanium, and vanadium from vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite: Sodium modification-direct reduction coupled process. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2017, 24, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bauer, G.; Volker, G.; Hans, H.; Andreas, O.; Oskar, R.; Heinz, R.; Siegfried, S. Vanadium and vanadium compounds. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; Volume A27, pp. 367–386. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jena, B.C.; Dresler, W.; Reilly, I.G. Extraction of titanium, vanadium and iron from titanomagnetite deposits at pipestone lake, Manitoba, Canada. Miner. Eng. 1995, 8, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J. Handbook of Hydrometallurgy; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2005; pp. 935–966. [Google Scholar]
  31. Barin, I. Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances, 3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995; pp. 700, 702, 703, 713, 714, 716, 1047, 1505, 1692, 1778, 1780. [Google Scholar]
  32. ACerS-NIST Phase Equilibria Diagrams (PC Database Ver. 4.0, NIST Standard Reference Database 31); Figures No. 96-1, 696-A; American Ceramic Society: Westerville, OH, USA; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2014.
  33. Chen, H. Study on extraction of V2O5 from vanadium-bearing slag by lime roasting. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan. 1992, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, X. Ferrous Metallurgy; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2014; Volume 1, p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, X. Principle of Iron and Steel Metallurgy; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2017; p. 633. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Standard Gibbs free energy diagram of some reactions. Reproduced with permission from [31], Copyright © 1995 VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Figure 1. Standard Gibbs free energy diagram of some reactions. Reproduced with permission from [31], Copyright © 1995 VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Minerals 09 00197 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate used in this study.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate used in this study.
Minerals 09 00197 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrograph and EDS of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate: (a) SEM micrograph; (b) EDS of Point 1 in Figure 3a; (c) EDS of Point 2 in Figure 3a; (d) EDS of Point 3 in Figure 3a.
Figure 3. SEM micrograph and EDS of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate: (a) SEM micrograph; (b) EDS of Point 1 in Figure 3a; (c) EDS of Point 2 in Figure 3a; (d) EDS of Point 3 in Figure 3a.
Minerals 09 00197 g003
Figure 4. TG-DSC analysis of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate.
Figure 4. TG-DSC analysis of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate.
Minerals 09 00197 g004
Figure 5. Effect of roasting temperature on vanadium loss.
Figure 5. Effect of roasting temperature on vanadium loss.
Minerals 09 00197 g005
Figure 6. Effect of roasting temperature on vanadium leaching efficiency.
Figure 6. Effect of roasting temperature on vanadium leaching efficiency.
Minerals 09 00197 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate before and after roasting (roasting time: 2 h; atmosphere: air): (a) Concentrate; (b) 800 °C; (c) 1000 °C; (d) 1200 °C; (e) 1250 °C.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrate before and after roasting (roasting time: 2 h; atmosphere: air): (a) Concentrate; (b) 800 °C; (c) 1000 °C; (d) 1200 °C; (e) 1250 °C.
Minerals 09 00197 g007
Figure 8. Changes of concentrate appearances at different roasting temperatures: (a) Raw material; (b) Sample after roasting at 800 °C; (c) Sample after roasting at 1000 °C; (d) Sample after roasting at 1200 °C.
Figure 8. Changes of concentrate appearances at different roasting temperatures: (a) Raw material; (b) Sample after roasting at 800 °C; (c) Sample after roasting at 1000 °C; (d) Sample after roasting at 1200 °C.
Minerals 09 00197 g008
Figure 9. SEM micrograph and EDS of the roasted product at 1250 °C: (a) SEM micrograph; (b) EDS of Point 1 in Figure 9a; (c) EDS of Point 2 in Figure 9a; (d) EDS of Point 3 in Figure 9a.
Figure 9. SEM micrograph and EDS of the roasted product at 1250 °C: (a) SEM micrograph; (b) EDS of Point 1 in Figure 9a; (c) EDS of Point 2 in Figure 9a; (d) EDS of Point 3 in Figure 9a.
Minerals 09 00197 g009
Figure 10. The schematic diagrams of phase transformation behavior of the samples: (a) A particle before roasting; (b) A particle after roasting (800–1200 °C); (c) Aggregation and sinter of two particles after roasting (1250 °C).
Figure 10. The schematic diagrams of phase transformation behavior of the samples: (a) A particle before roasting; (b) A particle after roasting (800–1200 °C); (c) Aggregation and sinter of two particles after roasting (1250 °C).
Minerals 09 00197 g010
Table 1. Composition of vanadium titanomagnetite concentrate used in this study (XRF) *.
Table 1. Composition of vanadium titanomagnetite concentrate used in this study (XRF) *.
CompositionFe2O3TiO2Al2O3SiO2MgOCaOV2O5MnOSum
Content (%)72.5512.684.663.823.260.960.750.6499.51
* Contents of Fe and V in the ore are determined as Fe2O3 and V2O5 respectively by XRF analysis. Contents of V, TFe, and FeO are 0.414%, 57.39%, and 33.76% respectively by chemical analysis. Sodium hydrate (≥96.0%, AR) was used as leaching agent in this study.
Table 2. Masses and vanadium contents of the samples before and after roasting and vanadium loss. Roasting time: 2 h, particle size: −74 μm of particle size, atmosphere: air.
Table 2. Masses and vanadium contents of the samples before and after roasting and vanadium loss. Roasting time: 2 h, particle size: −74 μm of particle size, atmosphere: air.
Troa. (°C)m1 (g)α (%)m2 (g)β (%)η (%)
80075.140.41475.890.3982.9
90075.360.41476.880.3874.6
100075.100.41475.890.3787.7
110075.210.41474.180.36712.6
120075.160.41473.160.35317.0
125075.250.41472.170.33921.5
Table 3. Masses and vanadium contents of the samples before and after leaching and vanadium leaching efficiency. Leaching temperature: 250 °C, pressure: 1.3 MPa, leaching time: 4 h, the ratio of liquor to solid: 3:1, leaching agent: 100 g/L NaOH.
Table 3. Masses and vanadium contents of the samples before and after leaching and vanadium leaching efficiency. Leaching temperature: 250 °C, pressure: 1.3 MPa, leaching time: 4 h, the ratio of liquor to solid: 3:1, leaching agent: 100 g/L NaOH.
Troa. (°C)m3 (g)ψ (%)m4 (g)φ (%)γ (%)
8001500.395147.8030.27232.1
9001500.387147.2070.24936.9
10001500.375147.1130.20945.3
11001500.361146.5620.18649.7
12001500.355146.1210.14959.1
12501500.337146.8910.14857.0

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, H.; Zhang, W.; Guo, Y.; Gao, Q.; Shen, F. Transformation of Vanadium-Bearing Titanomagnetite Concentrate in Additive-Free Roasting and Alkaline-Pressure Leaching for Extracting Vanadium (V). Minerals 2019, 9, 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030197

AMA Style

Zheng H, Zhang W, Guo Y, Gao Q, Shen F. Transformation of Vanadium-Bearing Titanomagnetite Concentrate in Additive-Free Roasting and Alkaline-Pressure Leaching for Extracting Vanadium (V). Minerals. 2019; 9(3):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Haiyan, Weiling Zhang, Yongchun Guo, Qiangjian Gao, and Fengman Shen. 2019. "Transformation of Vanadium-Bearing Titanomagnetite Concentrate in Additive-Free Roasting and Alkaline-Pressure Leaching for Extracting Vanadium (V)" Minerals 9, no. 3: 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop