Next Article in Journal
Metal Sources of World-Class Polymetallic W–Sn Skarns in the Nanling Range, South China: Granites versus Sedimentary Rocks?
Next Article in Special Issue
Adsorption Mechanism of Pb2+ Activator for the Flotation of Rutile
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of TiO2 on the Sintering Behavior of Chromium-Bearing Vanadium–Titanium Magnetite
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Minerals 2018, 8(7), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/min8070264

Different Flotation Performance of Ultrafine Scheelite under Two Hydrodynamic Cavitation Modes

School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 May 2018 / Revised: 14 June 2018 / Accepted: 16 June 2018 / Published: 23 June 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [3094 KB, uploaded 23 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

In industrial practice, hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is commonly triggered by jetting either reagent solution or pulp. Although both methods can enhance mineral flotation, are their roles the same? There are few research studies in the field, which severely limits our understanding on mineral flotation combined with HC. Therefore, in this study, the flotation of ultrafine scheelite with HC pretreatments of reagent solution and pulp (abbreviated to be HCPS and HCPP, respectively) was studied and compared through flotation tests, zeta potential analysis, microscope tests, and shear yield stress measurements. The results of flotation tests show that both HCPS and HCPP can enhance the final flotation performance, but in general, HCPP leads to greater improvements on the final flotation recovery. The presence of (hydrophobized) scheelite particles brings extra gas nuclei for the cavitation–flotation system, suggesting that more NBs may be produced in the case of HCPP compared with HCPS. These tiny bubbles remarkably reduce the size distribution of bubbles in the flotation system, thus increasing the particle–bubbles collision probability. Increase in particle aggregation may be another reason why flotation with HCPP results in a higher flotation recovery. The adherence of NBs on hydrophobized particles decreases the (absolute) surface charge of the solids, resulting in a smaller repulsive force among particles and more significant particle aggregation, which is confirmed by the microscope tests and shear yield stress measurements. View Full-Text
Keywords: ultrafine scheelite; cavitation mode; nanobubbles; particle aggregation ultrafine scheelite; cavitation mode; nanobubbles; particle aggregation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, W.; Ou, L.; Shi, Q.; Feng, Q.; Chen, H. Different Flotation Performance of Ultrafine Scheelite under Two Hydrodynamic Cavitation Modes. Minerals 2018, 8, 264.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Minerals EISSN 2075-163X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top