Next Article in Journal
Genesis and Mineralization Process of the Lanuoma Sediment-Hosted Pb–Zn Deposit, Sanjiang Metallogenic Belt, Southwestern China: Constraints from Zn, Pb, and S Isotopes
Next Article in Special Issue
Triassic Skarn Co Mineralization in Eastern Segment of East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, China: Insights from Haisi Fe-Co Deposit
Previous Article in Journal
Supergene Alteration of Skarn and Marble at Flotouo (Ity, Ivory Coast): Controls on Gold and Trace-Metal Enrichment in the Saprolite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Origin of Black Shale-Hosted Dagangou Vanadium Deposit, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China: Evidence from Mineralogy and Geochemistry

1
College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
2
No. 5 Geological Survey Institute of Qinghai Province, Xining 810099, China
3
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources of China, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2026, 16(2), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020163
Submission received: 25 December 2025 / Revised: 22 January 2026 / Accepted: 29 January 2026 / Published: 30 January 2026

Abstract

Little is known of a large black shale belt within the Naij Tal Group in the East Kunlun region, which hosts polymetallic deposits, including manganese, vanadium, and cobalt. The recently discovered Dagangou vanadium mineralization is the first black rock series-type vanadium deposit in the East Kunlun region and Qinghai Province and represents a significant find owing to its intermediate scale. This study investigated the mineralogy, major and trace elements, rare earth elements, and platinum group element geochemistry of the Dagangou vanadium deposit. Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy revealed that the main vanadium-bearing minerals are micas, followed by limonite, clay minerals, feldspar, and jarosite. The SiO2/Al2O3, Co/Zn, Sr/Ba, and Pd/Ir ratios, as well as the Ir content of the ores, indicated strong involvement of hydrothermal activity in the mineralization process. The V/Cr, Ni/Co, and U/Th ratios, as well as the δU values and significant negative δCe anomalies, suggested that the vanadium-bearing black rock series formed in a strongly anoxic reducing environment. The Al2O3/(Al2O3 + Fe2O3) and MnO/TiO2 ratios, along with weak positive δEu anomalies and strong enrichment of heavy rare earth elements, indicated that mineralization occurred in an extensional tectonic setting. The black shale-hosted vanadium polymetallic deposit formed in a setting that transitioned from an open oceanic deep-sea environment to a progressively shallower continental margin.

1. Introduction

The black shale series includes dark gray to black siliceous (silica-rich), carbonate (carbonate-rich), and argillaceous (clay-rich) rocks, along with their metamorphic equivalents. These rocks contain high levels of organic carbon and sulfides [1]. These black series used to be rich in vanadium (V), nickel (Ni), Mo, uranium (U), platinum group elements (PGEs), Se, Au, Ag, Cd, Ti, yttrium (Y), rare earth elements (REEs), Ba, phosphorus (P), and coal [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. It often hosts large to super-large ore deposits and is, thus, known as the “polymetallic enrichment layer.”
The sedimentary environment, a source of metallogenic materials, and the genesis of black shale-hosted vanadium deposits have consistently been focal issues in research. Black shale series can form in stagnant settings such as continental shelf margins and ocean basins [9]. It is widely believed that they develop in anoxic reducing environments resulting from the degradation of organic matter [10]. However, the extent of anoxia remains poorly constrained, ranging from mildly anoxic to severely anoxic conditions [11,12,13,14,15,16]. The sources of metallogenic materials for vanadium deposits primarily include terrigenous clast [12,17,18,19], submarine hydrothermal venting [13,20,21,22,23,24], and seawater (involving the enrichment by organic matter) [14,25,26,27]. The genetic models can be broadly categorized into five types: seawater sedimentary [28,29,30], seafloor hydrothermal sedimentary [31,32,33,34,35,36,37], biogenic sedimentary [38], extraterrestrial impact [39,40], and hydrothermal-dominated mixed [41,42].
Black shale series typically appear dark gray to black due to their high organic matter content and commonly contain fine-grained sulfides. Particularly for black mudstones, the presence of abundant clay minerals (such as illite) further complicates the microscopic identification of minerals. This significantly increases the difficulty of studying the occurrence states of vanadium. It is widely recognized that vanadium enrichment in black shale-type vanadium deposits primarily occurs in three forms: within organic matter, hosted in clay minerals, and as independent vanadium-bearing minerals [28,43,44]. In recent years, with advancements in analytical techniques and testing precision, an increasing number of independent vanadium-bearing minerals have been identified, including vanadinite [45], vanadium garnet [46,47], calciovolborthite [47], Berndlehmannite [48], mannardite, and sulvanite [49,50].
The formation and development of black shale-hosted deposits are often closely linked to major turning points in Earth’s history, as well as to the assembly, breakup, and subsequent relatively tectonically quiescent environments of the supercontinent Pangea [8]. The East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB), located at the western portion of China’s Central Orogenic Belt (Figure 1a), has undergone two crucial tectonic regime transition periods: the early Caledonian period, marking the shift from a passive continental margin to an active continental margin, and the late Indosinian period, characterized by the transition from compressional orogeny to intraplate lithospheric extension and thinning, associated with the evolution of the Cambrian–Devonian Proto-Tethys Ocean and the Carboniferous–Triassic Paleo-Tethys Ocean [51,52,53,54,55,56,57], It also hosts numerous Ni-Cu-Co-Au-Fe-Pb-Zn-Li-Nb-REE deposits [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. However, the EKOB lacks a significant black shale-hosted vanadium deposit [69]. Recently, several V deposits associated with black shale—Dagangou, North Dagangou, Wenquangou, and North Heishishan—were discovered in EKOB. The Dagangou V deposit in Golmud City has reached a medium-scale status, suggesting some potential for the region, and represents the first discovery of V deposits in EKOB.
However, studies on V metallogenesis are limited, with most addressing only regional patterns [70] while neglecting key aspects such as geological characteristics, ore-forming environments, deposit genesis, and metallogenic material sources. This study investigated the Dagangou V deposit, a black shale-hosted deposit in the EKOB. In this study, detailed geological field investigation, major and trace element analysis of whole rocks and vanadium ore, PGE analysis of vanadium ore, mineralogical observation, and SEM-EDS analysis of vanadium ore were conducted on the Dagangou deposit. This study aims to (1) determine the geological background of black shale in EKOB, (2) investigate the genesis of vanadium deposits, and (3) ascertain the occurrence state of vanadium.

2. Geological Setting

2.1. Regional Geology

The Dagangou V deposit lies on the southern margin of the Qaidam Basin in the Burhan Budai Mountains section of the central East Kunlun Mountains. Tectonically, it is part of the South Kunlun Terrane subduction–accretion complex zone within the East Kunlun Orogenic Belt of the Qin–Qi–Kun system. The East Kunlun Belt has undergone several marginal orogenic stages, evolving from the Pre-Proto-Tethyan Ocean to the Tethyan Ocean [19]. Its tectonic framework is marked by four nearly EW- to NW-trending faults: North Kunlun, Central Kunlun, South Kunlun, and A’nyemaqen. These faults divide the three tectonic zones within East Kunlun and separate them from the Bayan Har Belt to the south (Figure 1b). From north to south, the orogenic belt consists of the North Kunlun Caledonian back-arc rift zone, the Central Kunlun basement uplift granite zone, the South Kunlun composite accretion zone, the A’nyemaqen Ophiolitic Belt, and the Bayan Har Orogenic Belt [71,72].
The Ordovician–Silurian Central Kunlun Ocean subducted northward, forming a typical subduction–accretionary complex wedge on the southern slope of East Kunlun. Its northern boundary is defined by the Central Kunlun fault, adjacent to the East Kunlun magmatic arc, while the South Kunlun fault marks its southern boundary, adjacent to the Muztag–Xidatan–Buqingshan ophiolitic mélange zone and Maduo-Maqin accretionary wedge. This complex wedge represents an important giant suture zone in the northern Tibetan Plateau [73] and plate junction between the Qin–Qi–Kun and Tibet–Sanjiang orogenic systems [74]. The subduction–accretionary complex wedge on the southern slope of East Kunlun generally trends NWW. It comprises the Meso-Neoproterozoic Wanbaogou Group, Early Paleozoic Ordovician–Silurian Naij Tal Group, Early Triassic Hongshuichuan Formation, Early–Middle Triassic Naocangjiangou Formation, Late Triassic Babao Shan Formation, and Early Jurassic Yangqu Formation. Volcanic activity in the area is weak. Magmatic intrusions are common, primarily including Neoproterozoic collision-related granodioritic gneiss and monzonitic granite gneiss, Early Silurian subduction-related peraluminous monzonitic granite, and Late Silurian syn-collisional strongly peraluminous high-K calc-alkaline quartz diorite–granodiorite assemblages. Additionally, Late Triassic extensional gabbro is locally developed.
The Naij Tal Group constitutes the main geological body of this subduction–accretionary complex wedge. From bottom to top, the formations are Shuini Chang, Shihui Chang, and Halabayigou. The Halabayigou Formation is further subdivided into calcareous phyllite, carbonaceous phyllite, phyllite, and sandy-slate members. The calcareous phyllite member consists mainly of gray-black schistose calcareous phyllite, sericite phyllite, calcareous silty slate, and argillaceous–calcareous phyllitic slate, with subordinate gray quartz schist and gray mylonitized schistose metasandstone. The carbonaceous phyllite member is composed of gray-green to gray-black spotted carbonaceous phyllite, schistose phyllite, phyllitized slate, argillaceous slate, and silty slate, followed by metasandstone, gray-spotted meta-siltstone, feldspathic quartz siltstone, minor meta-medium- to fine-grained lithic quartz sandstone, and argillaceous limestone. The phyllite member is dominated by gray-green schistose phyllite, with lesser amounts of gray metasandstone, light-gray quartz–albite schist, and siliceous rock. The sandy-slate member primarily comprises gray meta-medium- to fine-grained feldspathic quartz sandstone, sub-litharenite, sub-arkose, dark gray thin-bedded sericite phyllitic slate, medium-bedded meta-siltstone, calcareous siltstone, and argillaceous–calcareous slate, followed by deformed conglomerate and pebble-bearing coarse sandstone. Overall, this suite represents shallow- to semi-deep marine sedimentary deposits. The mineralization is associated with island arcs, continental margin arcs, and back-arc basins within the active continental margin, predominantly forming submarine hydrothermal sedimentary deposits, such as Tuolugou cobalt, Santonggou manganese, and Dagangou V deposits, with a minor proportion related to mid-ocean ridges.

2.2. Ore Deposit Geology

The mining area is primarily underlain by the Halabayigou Formation of the Ordovician Naij Tal Group, with minor exposure of the Meso-Neoproterozoic Wanbaogou Group (Figure 2). The Wanbaogou Group occurs mainly as lenticular bodies in the northern part of the mining area. The outcrops have a surface width of 50–500 m and a length of ~5 km. The overall attitude of the unit dips northward at an angle of 53–77°. Lithologically, it is composed of microcrystalline marble and metasandstone, with contact between them occurring along ductile faults. The Halabayigou Formation is the dominant stratigraphic unit and serves as the ore-bearing sequence. This formation is divided into three lithological members from bottom to top: The Lower Member consists primarily of a carbonate sequence of light-gray limestone with locally well-developed schistosity, with a thickness exceeding 100 m. The Middle Member is the main V-ore-bearing horizon. The lower part comprises a yellowish-brown to gray-black argillaceous–calcareous slate, which has a fault-contact relationship with the underlying Lower Member. The middle part features interbedded thin-layered black carbonaceous and gray-black carbonaceous siliceous slates with occasional thin limestone interlayers. The upper part consists of interbedded dolomitic limestone and argillaceous–calcareous slate. The Upper Member is characterized by an interbedded sequence of argillaceous–calcareous slate and limestone, with thin sandstone layers exposed in the center.
Six faults were identified within the mining area, all trending NWW (northwest), and most are reverse faults. The development of these fracture structures induces ductile–brittle deformation in rocks, forming large-scale ductile shear or tectonic crush zones. Magmatic rocks and dikes are not extensively developed in mining areas. The dikes are predominantly quartz veins that intrude the strata in banded and lenticular forms.
Overall, 37 V ore bodies were identified within the four V mineralization and alteration zones studied. The V ore bodies generally range in length from 98 to 3720 m and in thickness from 0.7 to 15.03 m, with V2O5 grades of 0.5%–2.92%. The ore bodies exhibit simple morphology, layered organization, and significant variations in thickness and grade along the strike and dip, characterized by pinching and swelling. The M1 ore bodies in the HSI V ore zone and the M3-2, M3, and M3-5 ore bodies in the HSIII V ore zone are relatively large in both length and scale, representing the main ore bodies. The V ore bodies are hosted in black carbonaceous and carbonaceous siliceous slates, with the wall rock comprising limestone and argillaceous–calcareous slate. The overall estimated V ore resources in the mining area amount to 15,586 thousand tons, with an average deposit grade of 0.80% and V2O5 content of 126,625 tons, representing a medium-sized deposit [75].

3. Sampling and Analytical Methods

3.1. Sampling

Samples were primarily collected from the surface and deep drill holes along exploration line 9, specifically targeting the ore and wall rocks of the main M3-2 ore body (Figure 2b). The lithology of the ore is mainly carbonaceous and carbonaceous siliceous slate, whereas the wall rocks consist primarily of limestone, dolomitic limestone, and argillaceous–calcareous slate. Whole-rock major and trace element analyses were conducted for each sample. Representative samples were selected and polished into thin sections and blocks. After detailed microscopic observations, specific areas of the ores were delineated for scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS).

3.2. Major and Trace Element Analyses

Major and trace elements were analyzed at the Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation, Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, China. Fresh samples were powdered to 200 mesh using an agate ring mill, and a 0.1 g aliquot of the sample was accurately weighed (precision: ±0.1 mg) and transferred into a 50 mL polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) beaker. The sample was first moistened with a small volume of deionized water, followed by the sequential addition of 10 mL nitric acid (HNO3), 10 mL hydrofluoric acid (HF), and 2 mL perchloric acid (HClO4). The beaker was placed on an electric hotplate preheated to 250 °C and evaporated until dense perchloric acid fumes evolved; this state was were maintained for approximately 3 min. The beaker was then removed from the hotplate and allowed to cool to ambient temperature.
Subsequently, 10 mL HNO3, 10 mL HF, and 2 mL HClO4 were re-added to the beaker, which was then heated on the electric hotplate for 10 min. The power was turned off, and the mixture was left to stand overnight for thorough digestion. After standing, the beaker was reheated on the hotplate until the perchloric acid fumes were completely dissipated and then removed from the heat source. While the residue was still warm, 8 mL of aqua regia was added, and the beaker was returned to the electric hotplate to evaporate the solution to a final volume of 2–3 mL. The inner wall of the beaker was rinsed with approximately 10 mL of deionized water, and the mixture was gently heated for 5–10 min until a clear solution was obtained. The beaker was then removed and allowed to cool. Once cooled, the solution was transferred into a 10 mL graduated stoppered polyethylene test tube, diluted to the marked volume with deionized water, thoroughly mixed, and left to stand for clarification. A 1.00 mL aliquot of the clear supernatant was pipetted into a polyethylene test tube and diluted to 10 mL with nitric acid solution (3 + 97, v/v) for instrumental analysis.
Trace rare earth elements (REEs) were determined using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, 7700 series, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) under the following optimized operating conditions: radio frequency (RF) power of 1300 W, lens voltage of 6 V, pulse stage voltage of 850 V, quadrupole offset set to standard (0), vacuum pressure in the detection region of 1 × 10−6 Pa, and sample uptake rate of 1.0 mL/min. Major elements were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, 8300V, PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with the following parameters: plasma RF power of 1200 W, peristaltic pump speed of 1.5 mL/min, and 3 replicate measurements per sample to ensure data reliability. The analytical precisions for major and trace elements were >1% and 5%, respectively.

3.3. PGE Analyses

PGE analysis and testing were performed at the Qinghai Provincial Geological and Mineral Testing and Application Center (Xining Mineral Resources Supervision and Testing Center of the Ministry of Natural Resources). A 10.0 g aliquot of the sample was accurately weighed and homogenized with assay flux in a fusion crucible. A small quantity of covering agent was added to the mixture, which was then placed in a high-temperature furnace preheated to 1150 °C for a 1.5 h fusion process. The resulting nickel button was crushed and transferred to a beaker, where 60 mL of hydrochloric acid (HCl) was introduced. The mixture was subjected to dissolution until the solution clarified completely with no further bubbling observed. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of sodium tellurate co-precipitant and 1 mL of stannous chloride (SnCl2) solution were added sequentially, and the mixture was incubated on a hotplate for 30 min under constant temperature conditions. Filtration was conducted using a 0.45 μm filter membrane, and the collected precipitate was rinsed repeatedly with 2 mol/L HCl and deionized water to remove residual impurities.
The precipitate, together with the filter membrane, was transferred into a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sealed digestion vessel, followed by the addition of 1–2 mL of aqua regia. Digestion was carried out in a temperature-controlled oven at 100 °C for 2 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the digested solution was transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask, diluted to the marked volume with deionized water, and thoroughly mixed. PGE concentrations were determined using an ELAN DRC-e inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, PerkinElmer Inc., Massachusetts, USA) operated at a power of 1175 W.
In conventional geological sample analysis, indium (In), cadmium (Cd), thallium (Tl), and rhenium (Re) are widely employed as internal standards. However, carbonaceous slate samples are characterized by elevated contents of metallic elements—particularly selenium (Se), tellurium (Te), Cd, In, lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), zinc (Zn), and Re—which exhibit strong affinities with sulfide minerals. This renders the conventional internal standard method entirely incompatible with black shale series samples. Among these elements, Re and Tl are present in the highest abundances in carbonaceous slates, while lutetium (Lu) occurs at relatively low concentrations and does not undergo enrichment during the nickel sulfide fire assay procedure. Consequently, Lu was selected as the internal standard for this study. The analytical precision for all target PGEs was consistently below 2%, confirming the reliability of the optimized method [76,77,78].

3.4. Mineralogical Observation

Mineralogical observations were conducted at the Comprehensive Rock and Mineral Identification Laboratory, College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, China, using a Nikon LHS-H100C-1 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) capable of transmitted, reflected, and fluorescent light microscopy, equipped with a 100 W Hg light source. A Nikon DXM 1200 digital camera (Tokyo, Japan) was used for microphotography.

3.5. SEM-EDS

The SEM-EDS measurements were conducted at the SEM Laboratory of Xi’an Zhaonian Mineral Testing Technology Co., Ltd. (Xi’an, China) A high-resolution JSM-6460 scanning electron microscope (SEM, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK), coupled with an Oxford Link ISIS energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK), was employed for the analysis, under high-vacuum mode with an accelerating voltage of 25–30 kV and a beam current of 70 μA. Separately, energy spectrum analysis was carried out using an Oxford X-Max 50 energy-dispersive spectrometer (Oxford, UK), operating at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, a beam current of 0.3 nA, and a working distance of 8 mm.

4. Mineralogical Characteristics

The primary ore types in the Dagangou V deposit are carbonaceous (Figure 3a–c and Figure 4b) and carbonaceous siliceous slates (Figure 3d and Figure 4a). The carbonaceous slate is typically deep black and exhibits a cryptocrystalline texture and slaty structure. On the surface, it appears as a loose black powder that easily soils hands. The rock is primarily composed of abundant carbonaceous powder (30%–60%) and minor sericite (2%–5%), with subordinate amounts of fine quartz veins (25%–55%) and metallic minerals (5%–10%). The carbonaceous siliceous slate is gray-black with a cryptocrystalline texture and slaty structure. The rock mainly comprises a mixture of carbonaceous powder and clay minerals (57%), chalcedony (30%), and clay and metallic minerals (8%), as well as quartz veins (5%). In the ores, carbonaceous materials and clay minerals often occur as aggregates that are closely intergrown (Figure 4c,d). Under a microscope, they typically display a banded distribution, with bands generally 0.01–0.1 mm wide. Quartz in the ore (Figure 4e) occurs mostly as anhedral granular crystals distributed in fine-grained bands or veins, typically measuring only 0.01–0.1 mm. Pyrite (Figure 4f) is one of the main metallic minerals observed under the microscope. It is fine-grained and mostly disseminated, and its crystal forms are diverse and predominantly anhedral, with some crystals exhibiting cubic or framboidal habits.

5. Results

5.1. Major Elements

The primary ore-bearing lithologies—carbonaceous and carbonaceous siliceous slates—exhibited SiO2 contents of 27.03%–68.03% (average: 48.67%); Al2O3, 1.49%–12.67% (7.15%); Fe2O3, 2.91%–10.32% (5.35%); P2O5, 0.11%–3.63% (1.23%); and TOC, 1.07%–3.07% (1.75%, Table 1). In contrast, the wall-rock argillaceous slate had a relatively higher SiO2 content of 61.18%–73.94% (average: 68.23%). Carbonate rocks generally exhibited lower SiO2 contents (0.85%–35.55%, average: 13.34%). Al2O3 content was higher in the argillaceous–calcareous slate (average: 12.92%) and lower in the carbonate rocks (average: 2.10%). The average Fe2O3 content was 4.98% in the argillaceous slate and 1.58% in the carbonate rock. Both the argillaceous slate and carbonate rocks had low P2O5 contents (average: 0.09%).

5.2. Trace Elements

The trace element normalization diagram (Figure 5) indicates that, relative to the upper crustal abundance [79], the ore-bearing black rock series was significantly enriched in B, V, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, Te, Ba, W, Au, Tl, Bi, U, and Y, whereas it was markedly depleted in Sc, Co, Nb, Rb, Zr, Sn, Hf, Ta, and Th. Specifically, V ranged from 246.5 mg/kg to 6934 mg/kg, with enrichment factors of 1.7–49.5 and an average of 26.8 (Table 2). Mo ranged from 3.2 to 395.1 mg/kg, with enrichment factors of 2–247 and an average of 133.1. Se ranged from 6.12 to 34.77 mg/kg, with enrichment factors of 43.7–248.4 and an average of 158.4. Additionally, As, Ga, Ag, Cd, Sb, Te, Ba, Au, Bi, and U exhibited enrichment factors exceeding 10. Overall, the enrichment patterns of V, Se, Mo, Ba, Cd, As, Sb, Ga, and U in this rock suite align with the elemental characteristics of polymetallic black shales [80]. In contrast, the wall rocks were significantly enriched in Ga, As, Se, Cd, Sb, Te, Ba, and Au, whereas they showed marked depletion in Be, Sc, Ni, Cu, Pb, Zn, V, Rb, Sr, Mo, Sn, Ta, U, and other elements.

5.3. REE + Y Composition

The total REE (∑REE) contents in different lithologies of the Dagangou area were generally low (3.44–440.46 mg/kg, average: 171.36 mg/kg). In the V-bearing black rock series (carbonaceous slate), the ∑REE ranged from 133.37 to 440.46 mg/kg, averaging 291.92 mg/kg. Compared with the Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS), all the elements except Ce showed varying degrees of enrichment. The europium anomaly (δEu) was calculated using δEu = 2 × w(Eu)N/[w(Sm)n + w(Gd)N], where “N” denotes PAAS-normalized values. The Eu values ranged from 0.68 to 2.86 (Table 3). The Ce anomaly (δCe) was calculated using δCe = 2 × w(Ce)N/[w(La)N + w(Nd)N], with “N” also representing PAAS-normalized values. The Ce values ranged from 0.28 to 1.26 (Table 3). The normalized REE patterns were nearly flat and slightly left-leaning (Figure 6), indicating that the V-polymetallic mineralization in the black rock series of the Dagangou area is characterized by strong enrichment in heavy REEs (HREEs), weak enrichment in light REEs (LREEs), and a low degree of fractionation between LREEs and HREEs.

5.4. PGEs

The concentrations of PGEs exhibited significant variation between different lithologies (Table 4). In terms of rock types, carbonaceous slate was the preferred horizon for PGE enrichment, followed by carbonaceous siliceous slate. In contrast, the argillaceous slate and dolomite rocks showed essentially no PGE anomalies. Based on concentration coefficients relative to the crustal abundance in [82], the carbonaceous and carbonaceous siliceous slates showed varying degrees of enrichment for all elements, except Ir and Rh. The concentration coefficients decreased in the order Ru > Pd > Os > Pt > Ir > Rh. In argillaceous slate and dolomite, all elements except Ru showed varying degrees of depletion. Notably, the carbonaceous slate exhibited anomalous enrichment in Pd and Pt, classifying it as palladium–platinum enriched.

6. Discussion

6.1. Identification of V-Bearing Minerals

SEM revealed that the ore was primarily composed of mica, quartz, carbonaceous material, limonite, clay minerals, pyrite, and minor amounts of feldspar, jarosite, rutile, and carbonate minerals. Mica occurred mainly at fine scales and was closely intergrown with quartz. Minute flakes were also intergrown with feldspar, kaolinite, and limonite (Figure 7a,b). The grains were generally fine (0.005–0.05 mm), although some aggregates reached ~0.2 mm. Quartz predominantly existed as anhedral granular crystals, including microcrystalline and cryptocrystalline forms. It was closely intergrown with carbonaceous materials and minerals such as mica and feldspar, with grain sizes mainly ranging from 0.01 to 0.50 mm. Carbonaceous material aggregates exhibited irregular granular or patchy forms. The intergranular spaces were primarily filled with quartz and small amounts of mica, calcite, limonite, and halite. Limonite occurred mainly in irregular or granular forms, with some varieties displaying colloform textures or concentric bands. It was distributed within minerals, such as quartz and carbonaceous materials, and closely intergrown with quartz, mica, and feldspar (Figure 7e,f). The grain size typically ranged from 0.01 to 0.30 mm. Clay minerals, primarily kaolinite, were distributed in fine blades or scales with very small particle sizes. They were mainly microcrystalline or cryptocrystalline and closely intergrown with fine-grained quartz, mica, feldspar, and carbonaceous material (Figure 7a). Pyrite, the main sulfide mineral in the ore, occurred as euhedral to anhedral granular crystals distributed within the ore, with grain sizes mainly between 0.01 and 0.20 mm. Feldspar was predominantly anhedral and granular and closely intergrown with fine-grained quartz, mica, and kaolinite (Figure 7c,d). Rutile was primarily distributed in the ores as granular crystals. Carbonate minerals, primarily calcite and dolomite, occurred as granular or vein-like aggregates distributed within quartz and carbonaceous materials.
Figure 7. Backscattered electron images of vanadium-bearing minerals. (a) Vanadium sericite (V-Ser) was closely intergrown with quartz (Qtz) and carbonaceous matter (C). (b) V-Ser (Figure 8a) occurred irregularly within Qtz interstices, with V-Ser closely intergrown with vanadium clay (V-Cly) (Figure 8d) minerals on the left. (c) Vanadium feldspar (V-Fsp, Figure 8c) was closely intergrown with Qtz, with a vanadium rutile (V-Rt) grain on the left. (d) V-Fsp was loosely intergrown with V-Ser and closely intergrown with jarosite (Jrs). (e) Granular vanadium limonite (V-Lim) was closely intergrown with Qtz. (f) Colloform V-Lim (Figure 8b) was closely intergrown with V-Ser and Qtz.
Figure 7. Backscattered electron images of vanadium-bearing minerals. (a) Vanadium sericite (V-Ser) was closely intergrown with quartz (Qtz) and carbonaceous matter (C). (b) V-Ser (Figure 8a) occurred irregularly within Qtz interstices, with V-Ser closely intergrown with vanadium clay (V-Cly) (Figure 8d) minerals on the left. (c) Vanadium feldspar (V-Fsp, Figure 8c) was closely intergrown with Qtz, with a vanadium rutile (V-Rt) grain on the left. (d) V-Fsp was loosely intergrown with V-Ser and closely intergrown with jarosite (Jrs). (e) Granular vanadium limonite (V-Lim) was closely intergrown with Qtz. (f) Colloform V-Lim (Figure 8b) was closely intergrown with V-Ser and Qtz.
Minerals 16 00163 g007
Figure 8. X-ray EDS spectra of vanadium-bearing minerals. (a) Sericite. (b) Limonite. (c) Potassium feldspar. (d) Kaolinite.
Figure 8. X-ray EDS spectra of vanadium-bearing minerals. (a) Sericite. (b) Limonite. (c) Potassium feldspar. (d) Kaolinite.
Minerals 16 00163 g008
SEM-EDS indicated that the V-bearing minerals in the ore samples were primarily mica, followed by limonite, clay minerals, feldspar, and jarosite (Figure 8a–d). Most mica grains contained measurable amounts of V and were classified as V mica. The V content varied significantly: barium V mica contained over 10% V2O5, whereas a small portion contained no V. Some limonite contained V, with V2O5 contents generally ranging from 0.55% to 5.05%. Feldspar was primarily classified as potassium feldspar (some containing barium and V) and albite, with minor amounts of barium feldspar. Some potassium feldspar was V-bearing. Some clay minerals contained minor amounts of V.

6.2. Source of Metals

The samples from the study area exhibited strong linear correlations between TiO2 and Al2O3, MnO, SiO2, and Sc (Figure 9), indicating that these elements are chemically stable, underwent a similar degree of sorting, and can reflect the composition of their source area.
The n(SiO2)/n(Al2O3) ratio is a commonly used indicator for distinguishing rock sources. Taylor proposed using a threshold ratio of 3.6 when studying Si and Al in the continental crust [83]. A ratio > 3.6 suggests the influence of hydrothermal activity or biological processes. A ratio of ~3.6 suggests the primary source of the rock is terrestrial. The n(SiO2)/n(Al2O3) ratios of the ore-bearing and wall rocks in the Dagangou black rock series V-polymetallic deposit (4.33–22.17, Table 1) indicated that both diagenesis and mineralization involved significant contributions from hydrothermal and biological activity. Choi et al. noted that sediments of hydrogenous origin typically have higher Ni and Co contents, whereas hydrothermally formed sediments have higher Ni and Zn contents [84]. In the Zn-Ni-Co diagram (Figure 10), the data points for both the ore-bearing and wall rocks fall within the field representing submarine hydrothermal sedimentation. This suggests that the V-polymetallic mineralization in the black rock series involved submarine hydrothermal sediments.
As terrestrial materials are rich in aluminum and oceanic hydrothermal sediments are rich in iron and manganese, the concentration relationships among Al, Fe, and Mn can be used to trace the provenance of sedimentary rocks. Studying Al-poor Fe–Mn sediments, Jewell and Stallard proposed that Al/(Al + Fe + Mn) > 0.5 represents typical deep-sea sediments with detrital provenance, whereas Al/(Al + Fe + Mn) < 0.35 suggests a predominantly hydrothermal source [85]. The n(Al)/n(Al + Fe + Mn) ratios ranged from 0.13 to 0.71 (average: 0.35, Table 1). Only sample Y13 had a value > 0.5, indicating that the material originated primarily from hydrothermal sources.
The Co/Zn ratio is a sensitive indicator for distinguishing between hydrothermal and authigenic sources. Cronan suggested that while Cu, Ni, and Zn are primarily of hydrothermal origin, Co is mainly hydrogenous, and its enrichment is attributed to the adsorption of trace elements from seawater [86]. Hydrothermally derived materials have relatively low Co/Zn ratios, averaging 0.15, whereas other ferromanganese crusts or nodules typically average ~2.5 [87]. The mineralized area is highly enriched in Ba. In his study of Cenozoic sedimentary strata, Kattyehkob indicated that the Sr/Ba ratio can be used to determine the rock origin: Sr/Ba > 1 indicates a sedimentary origin, whereas Sr/Ba < 1 indicates a hydrothermal origin [88,89]. The ore-bearing rocks had Co/Zn ratios of 0.01–0.07 and Sr/Ba ratios of 0.02–0.16 (Table 2), both indicating a hydrothermal origin. Carbonaceous chondrites can represent extraterrestrial sources, with characteristic ratios of w(Pd)/w(Pt) = 0.57 and w(Pt + Pd)/w(Os + Ru + Ir) = 0.86 [90]. However, the main PGE-enriched horizon (carbonaceous slate, Table 4) showed w(Pd)/w(Pt) ratios of 2.99–4.38 and w(Pt + Pd)/w(Os + Ru + Ir) ratios of 12.15–14.85. These values are not comparable to those in chondrites, eliminating an extraterrestrial origin for PGEs. The Pd/Ir ratio is commonly used to indicate the genesis of deposits. Owing to the different geochemical behaviors of Pd and Ir in magmatic and hydrothermal fluids, where Ir is immobile, hydrothermal sulfides typically exhibit low w(Ir) and high w(Pd)/w(Ir) values, whereas magmatic sulfide ores have relatively low w(Pd)/w(Ir) values [91,92]. Analysis of PGEs in five carbonaceous slate samples showed Ir contents of 0.08–0.57 ng/g and w(Pd)/w(Ir) ratios of 18.01–293.30, indicating a hydrothermal origin.

6.3. Depositional Environment

V and Ni both belong to the iron family of elements and exhibit multiple ionic valence states that vary with changes in the redox environment. V is readily adsorbed and enriched under oxidizing conditions, whereas Ni is more easily adsorbed under reducing conditions. Both elements are primarily precipitated and enriched by adsorption onto colloids and clay minerals. Therefore, the V/(V + Ni) ratio can be used to infer the redox conditions of a paleodepositional water body [10]. Here, a ratio > 0.46 indicates an anoxic environment, whereas a ratio < 0.46 suggests an oxic environment. Chromium (Cr) is a deep-seated element primarily concentrated in the Earth’s core and mantle. In marine sediments, Cr is primarily derived from detrital material. Both Cr and V are often incorporated into silicate minerals via trivalent isomorphic substitution and transported into the marine environment. However, V is preferentially bound to organic matter, leading to greater enrichment under reducing conditions [93]. Yarin et al. suggested that a V/Cr ratio > 2 indicates deposition in an anoxic environment, whereas a ratio < 2 suggests deposition in an oxic environment [94]. Jones et al. investigated trace elements in British mudstones and proposed that a Ni/Co ratio > 7 indicates a highly anoxic (dysoxic to anoxic) depositional environment, 5–7 suggests a suboxic (oxygen-deficient) environment, and <5 indicates an oxic environment [93]. The ore-bearing rocks exhibited V/(V + Ni) ratios of 0.62–0.98, V/Cr ratios of 14.29–36.37, and Ni/Co ratios of 7.92–29.73 (Table 2). Thus, the water column was highly anoxic during the formation of the ore-bearing black rock series.
The enrichment of some trace elements (U, Mo, Th, etc.) is mainly controlled by redox conditions, with only a small influence from the terrigenous detritus. Therefore, the extent of enrichment of these elements in sedimentary rocks and the ratio between them (MoEF, UEF, Th/U, etc.) can be used as effective indicators of the sedimentary environment [95,96,97]. The elemental association of Mo and U serves as a commonly used indicator system for discriminating redox conditions in sedimentary environments. This is often accomplished by employing a logarithmic scale of Mo and U enrichment factors (MoEF, UEF) for identification [97], which allows for the differentiation among dysaerobic, anoxic, and sulfidic environments. In the ore-bearing rocks of the Dagangou black rock series vanadium polymetallic deposit, the enrichment coefficients of Mo and U are relatively low, plotting within the range of 0.1 to 1 times that of normal seawater. These data are concentrated in the dysaerobic field (Figure 11), representing an oxygen-deficient (anoxic) environment. Wignall proposed a method for determining redox conditions using U and Th, where U + Th/3 represents authigenic uranium content [98]. The sedimentary environment was evaluated using δU = 2U/(U + Th/3), where values > 1 indicate an anoxic environment and values < 1 indicate a normal seawater environment. Jones et al. suggested that the U/Th ratio can also be used to determine redox conditions: U/Th < 0.75 indicates an oxic environment, 0.75–1.25 suggests a suboxic environment, and >1.25 signifies an anoxic environment [44]. Rona et al. concluded that the deposition and enrichment rates of U are accelerated in hydrothermal sedimentation environments [99]; sedimentary rocks formed under hydrothermal conditions exhibit higher U enrichment. Therefore, the U/Th ratio effectively distinguished between normal seawater and hydrothermal sedimentation; hydrothermal sediments typically have U/Th > 1, whereas normal sediments have U/Th < 1. The ore-bearing rocks had δU values of 1.85–2.00 and U/Th ratios of 3.55–241.59, with an average of 67.69—far exceeding 1.25 (Table 2). Therefore, both the δU and U/Th parameters indicate a highly anoxic environment coupled with hydrothermal sedimentation.
Elderfield et al. first used cerium (Ce) to explain the exchange processes of Ce ions during oxidation. In modern oceans, owing to oxidation, cerium exists as Ce4+, which readily hydrolyzes and is adsorbed and precipitated by iron–manganese hydroxides, clay, organic matter, and colloids [100]. Consequently, seawater exhibits a negative Ce anomaly relative to its neighboring elements La and Pr [101], whereas sediments are enriched, showing either a positive or weak negative anomaly. Under anoxic conditions, Ce is reduced to Ce3+ and released into the water column, leading to a positive Ce anomaly in seawater and corresponding depletion in contemporaneous sediments [102,103,104]. As later diagenesis, mineralization, and weathering may alter δCe values, Morad et al. proposed using the (La/Sm)ₙ ratio. The δCe value can reliably indicate paleomarine redox conditions only when the (La/Sm)ₙ ratio is >0.35 and shows no correlation with δCe [105]. Studying the black rock series of California, USA, Murray et al. suggested that δCe values for the mid-ocean ridge, oceanic basin, and continental margin environments were approximately 0.30, 0.55, and 0.79–1.54, respectively [106]. In the Dagangou area, the (La/Sm)ₙ ratios for all lithologies ranged from 2.16 to 4.84, all exceeding 0.35 (Table 3). A poor correlation was observed with δCe (−0.014). This confirms that the δCe values have not been significantly altered by later processes and retain their primary sedimentary signature. The V-bearing black rock series in the Dagangou area exhibited δCe values of 0.28–0.56 (Table 3), indicating a pronounced negative Ce anomaly. This suggests an anoxic depositional environment within the oceanic basin. Therefore, vanadate (V5+) can be reduced or complexed to form vanadyl ions (V4+), which can be fixed by forming V porphyrins through association with organic matter. It was then deposited in a reducing environment via biological activity or terrigenous detrital sedimentation. In environments rich in H2S, V4+ can be further reduced to V3+ and precipitated as V2O3 and V(OH)3 [107]. Therefore, the anoxic reducing conditions of the Ordovician sedimentary water column were likely instrumental in enriching V.
The n(Al2O3)/n(Al2O3 + Fe2O3) ratio is primarily used to determine the tectonic setting in which sedimentary rocks formed. Murray et al. proposed that this ratio falls within the 0.1–0.4 range in mid-ocean ridge settings, 0.4–0.7 in pelagic deep-sea settings, and typically 0.6–0.9 in continental margin settings [108]. The n(Al2O3)/n(Al2O3 + Fe2O3) ratios of the ore-bearing rocks in the Dagangou black rock series V-polymetallic deposit range between 0.39 and 0.76, predominantly indicating a pelagic deep-sea environment. In contrast, the wall rocks (argillaceous slate and dolomitic limestone) have ratios between 0.63 and 0.84 (Table 1), suggesting a continental margin environment. A comprehensive analysis indicated that the tectonic background during the formation of the black rock series V-polymetallic mineralization was a gradually evolving process. It transitioned from a pelagic deep-sea environment to a continental margin, reflecting a tectonic setting with a progressively shallower water depth.
The MnO/TiO2 ratio is primarily used to determine the sedimentary environment of sedimentary rocks. Sugisaki et al., in their study of manganese content, proposed that a MnO/TiO2 ratio of 0.5–3.5 suggests sedimentary formation on the ocean floor, whereas <0.5 suggests formation in a marginal sea or continental slope environment close to land [109]. The MnO/TiO2 ratios of the ore-bearing rocks in the Dagangou black rock series V-polymetallic deposit ranged from 0.01 to 0.48 (Table 1), indicating deposition in a marginal sea or continental slope environment near land.
Eu is particularly important in REE studies because it serves as a sensitive indicator of geochemical conditions and for identifying material sources, tectonic settings, and sedimentary environments. The Eu anomaly is determined based on the equilibrium between its two oxidation states, as it typically exists as a trivalent ion. When the sedimentary environment becomes strongly acidic and reducing, Eu3+ is reduced to a divalent cation, leading to the depletion of Eu in seawater and its enrichment in sediments. Conversely, in alkaline and oxidizing environments, Eu2+ is oxidized to Eu3+, causing the enrichment of Eu in seawater and its depletion in sediments. However, potential interference from barium (Ba) may limit the applicability of Eu in sedimentary environments [110]. In the Dagangou area, Ba contents across different lithologies ranged from 41.32 to 25,250 mg/kg (average: 9344 mg/kg, Table 2), indicating a high overall abundance. The correlation coefficient between δEu values and Ba content in the wall rocks (0.58) and V-bearing black rock series (0.95) indicated that the Eu anomaly during mineralization was influenced by Ba. Additionally, Taylor found that Archean sedimentary rocks exhibit either no Eu anomaly or a positive Eu anomaly, whereas post-Archean sedimentary rocks consistently show a negative Eu anomaly [111]. Zhao proposed that sediments in active continental margins are enriched in HREEs and lack Eu depletion, whereas sediments in passive continental margins are relatively enriched in LREEs and exhibit negative Eu anomalies [112]. In the Dagangou area, δEu values in the wall rocks ranged from 0.92 to 2.86, mostly showing positive δEu anomalies. The δEu values in the ore-bearing black rock series ranged from 0.71 to 1.20 (Table 3), generally indicating weak positive δEu anomalies, coupled with strong HREE enrichment. Thus, ore-bearing black rock series may be formed in a reducing environment associated with an active continental margin.
The Th-Hf/3-Ta diagram was initially proposed to discriminate between different genetic types of basalts [113]. However, non-reactive components of detrital particles ideally are characteristic of the original igneous source and thus are useful in provenance studies with the low-calcic marine black shales. Quinby-Hunt et al. used it to determine the sedimentary tectonic setting and material sources of the marine-formed black rock series [114]. On the Th-Hf/3-Ta diagram, the plotted points fall within the field of divergent plate margins (Figure 12), indicating that the sedimentary tectonic setting during mineralization was an extensional environment. During the Ordovician–Silurian period, the tectonic setting of the East Kunlun region was characterized by bidirectional subduction. With the intensification of rifting and formation of the Proto-Tethyan Ocean, the East Kunlun region evolved from a series of submarine rift valleys into a multi-island ocean. It is widely accepted that the Proto-Tethyan Ocean opened before ~601 Ma [115], underwent subduction by at least ~515 Ma [116], closed around ~440 Ma, and subsequently evolved into a postcollisional extensional setting driven by slab detachment and asthenospheric upwelling between ~430 Ma and 357 Ma [53,117,118,119]. Substantial evidence supports the hypothesis of an extensional setting: (1) the ultramafic–mafic complexes Cu-Ni sulfide deposits (e.g., Xiarihamu) formed under an extensional setting between ~431 Ma and 394 Ma [120,121,122,123,124,125]; (2) eclogite retrograde metamorphism in the CKB, extending ~530 km in length, peaked at ~412 Ma [126]; (3) bimodal volcanic rocks in the CKB formed between 420 Ma and 409 Ma [127]; (4) the Maoniushan Group, composed of continental volcanic rocks, exhibits molassetype characteristics and deposits from the Late Silurian to Early Devonian (423.2–399.6 Ma) [60,117,128]; and (5) several A2-type granitoids formed between 428 Ma and 357 Ma [129,130,131,132,133,134]. The conclusions from this diagram are consistent with the broader tectonic background.

6.4. Comparison of Similar-Type Deposits

China’s sedimentary vanadium deposits are mainly distributed in three metallogenic belts: the northern margin of the Tarim Platform, the northern margin of the Yangtze Platform, and the southeastern margin of the Yangtze Platform. The mineralization age is primarily concentrated in the Cambrian period [135]. Globally, the widespread development of Cambrian black shales is associated with a series of major geological events, including abrupt changes in paleo-oceanic environments, the Cambrian explosion of life, and the formation of large-scale sedimentary mineral resources [15]. This paper selects one typical vanadium deposit from each of the three major metallogenic belts in China and compares them in terms of host lithology, ore mineral characteristics, source of metallogenic materials, ore-forming environment, mode of occurrence of vanadium, and genetic model of the deposits (Table 5). Through comparison, we find that the Dagangou vanadium deposit shares similarities with the other deposits: (1) the ore-forming environments are all anoxic settings ranging from bathyal to neritic; (2) the host rocks are predominantly a suite of organic-carbon-rich slates, with ore minerals mainly consisting of mica-group and clay minerals; (3) the source of metallogenic materials is primarily seawater, with varying degrees of contribution from hydrothermal fluids and terrigenous clastic components; (4) vanadium mainly occurs in isomorphic form within mica-group minerals, followed by adsorption onto clay minerals or organic matter, while independent vanadium minerals are rare; and (5) the genetic models of the deposits include biogenic sedimentation, authigenic marine sedimentation, and mixed origins.

7. Conclusions

(1) The black rock series serves as the primary ore-bearing horizon in the study area, with lithologies dominated by carbonaceous and siliceous slates. The ore is composed mainly of mica, quartz, carbonaceous material, limonite, clay minerals, pyrite, and minor amounts of feldspar, jarosite, rutile, and carbonates. V is primarily hosted in mica, followed by limonite, clay minerals, feldspar, and jarosite.
(2) The ore-forming materials of the Dagangou V deposit have a complex origin resulting from the superposition of biogenic and submarine hydrothermal inputs. The complex source of the metallogenic materials is attributed to the superposition of submarine hydrothermal fluids with biological substances. The genetic model is hydrothermal-dominated mixed.
(3) V mineralization in the black rock series occurred during the northward subduction and consumption of the Central Kunlun Ocean during the Ordovician–Silurian period. The tectonic setting is characterized by an active continental margin that evolved from a pelagic deep-sea environment into a continental margin with progressively shallower water depths. Deposition took place in a proximal marginal sea and continental slope environment characterized by highly anoxic conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T. and F.S.; methodology, T.T.; software, J.Q.; validation, J.Q. and S.W.; formal analysis, G.X., G.M., T.T., Y.Q., J.Q. and Z.W.; investigation, J.Q., T.T., S.W. and Z.W.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.; writing—review and editing, F.S.; visualization, Y.Q., J.Q., S.W. and Z.W.; supervision, F.S.; funding acquisition, G.X. and G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for No. 5 Geological Survey Institute of Qinghai Province, grant numbers WKY-2021-10, WKY-2022-10, and WKY-2024-10.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the help of Fengyue Sun, Ye Qian, and Chao Hui during fieldwork.

Conflicts of Interest

The paper reflects the views of the scientists and not the company. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NEKFNorthern East Kunlun fault
CEKFCentral East Kunlun fault
SEKFSouthern East Kunlun fault
ATFAltyn Tagh strike-slip fault
WWFWenquangou–Wahongshan fault
NKBCaledonian back-arc basin of the Northern East Kunlun Belt
CKBuplifted granitic basement of the Central East Kunlun Belt
SKBcomposite accretion of the Southern East Kunlun Belt
AOBA’nyemaqen Ophiolitic Belt
REERare earth elements
PGEsPlatinum group elements
PASSPost-Archean Australian Shale
SEM-EDSScanning Electron Microscope–Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy

References

  1. Fan, D.L.; Ye, J.; Yang, R.Y. The geological events and mineralization near the boundary line of Precambrian and Cambrian in Yangtze Platform. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 1987, 5, 81–95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fan, D.L.; Yang, X.Z.; Wang, L.Y. Petrological and geochemical characteristics of a nickel-molybdenum-multi-element-bearing Lower Cambrian black shale from a certain district in south China. Geochimica 1973, 3, 143–164. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tyson, R.V. The genesis and palynofacies characteristics of marine petroleum source rocks. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1987, 26, 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, M.G. Geological Characteristics and Development Prospects of the Huangjiawan Nickel-Molybdenum Deposit in Zunyi. Guizhou Geol. 1998, 15, 305–310. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mao, J.W. Advances in the Study of Deposits Related to Black Shale Series. Miner. Depos. 2001, 20, 402–403. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lehmann, B.; Mao, J.W.; Li, S.R.; Zhang, G.D. Re-Os Dating of Polymetallic Ni-Mo-PGE-Au Mineralization in Lower Cambrian Black Shales of South China and Its Geological Significance—A reply. Econ. Geol. 2003, 98, 663–665. [Google Scholar]
  7. Coveney, R.M.; Jan, P. Diverse connections between ores and organic matter. Ore Geol. Rev. 2004, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fan, D.L.; Zhang, T.; Ye, J. Black Shales in China and Related Deposits; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. Twenhalef, W.H. Environments of origin of black Shales. Amer. Assoc. Petro. Geol. Bull. 1939, 23, 1178–1198. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arthur, M.A.; Sageman, B.B. Marine black shales: Deposition mechanisms and environments of ancient deposits. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1994, 22, 499–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lehmann, B.; Fu, X.R.; Xu, L.G.; Mao, J.W. Early Cambrian black shale-hosted Mo-Ni and V mineralization on the rifted margin of the Yangtze Platform, China: Reconnaissance chromium isotope data and a refined metallogenic model. Econ. Geol. Bull. Soc. Econ. Geol. 2016, 111, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, S.S.; Liu, Z.Q. Review on the origin of vanadium deposit in Lower Cambrian black rock series of Southern Qinling. J. Guilin Univ. Technol. 2015, 35, 774–779. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, S.S.; Wei, G.F.; Nie, J.T.; Li, X.B.; Wu, X.H. The geological and geochemical characteristics of Shuigou vanadium deposit in Southern Qinling and its genesis. Geoscience 2012, 26, 243–253. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, Y.H.; Wu, X.B.; Liu, W.J. Geological Characteristic and Origin Discussion of the Vanadium Deposit in Silongshan of Guizhou. Non-Ferr. Min. Metall. 2008, 5, 2–4+12. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu, L.G.; Fu, X.R.; Ye, H.S.; Zheng, W.; Chen, B.; Fang, Z.L. Geochemical composition and paleoceanic environment of the Lower Cambrian black shale-hosted Qianjiaping vanadium deposit in the southern Qinling Region. Earth Sci. Front. 2022, 29, 160–175. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shu, D.Y.; Hou, B.D.; Zhang, M.Q.; Xie, X.Y. Geochemistry and genesis of vanadium deposits in northeastern Guizhou. Miner. Depos. 2014, 33, 857–869. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, X.G.; Wang, Y.C.; Cheng, B.C.; Yang, Y.Q.; Wang, J.; Cheng, P. Rock geochemical characteristics and genesis of the Xihuang vanadium deposit in Henan Province. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. 2020, 44, 1116–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gong, H.W. Study on the Interaction Mechanism Between Organic Matter and Vanadium in Black Rock Series; China University of Petroleum: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. Qian, Z.Y.; Wei, Y.H. Geological Characteristics and Analysis of Sources of Ore-bearing Rock Series of Lijiashan Vanadium Deposit in Pengze County. World Nonferrous Met. 2019, 16, 160–161. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hou, J.F. Metallogenetic Characteristics and Regularities of Au-V Mineralization in Lower Cambrian Black Rock Series, Southern Qinling Mountain, China. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest University, Xi’an, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, L.S. Study on the Metallogenic Regularity and Geological-Geochemistry for Black Rock Series and Related Typical Deposits in Qinling Mountains, Shanxi. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest University, Xi’an, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, M.; Zhang, F.X. Characteristics of the Zhongcun-Yinhua vanadium deposit in the black rock series, Shanyang County, Shanxi Province. Geol. China 2009, 36, 1099–1109. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu, H.Z.; Hou, J.F.; Yuan, L.X.; Wang, S.L. Study on the occurrence of vanadium in the Qianjiaping vanadium deposit of Southern Qinling. Geol. China 2010, 46, 643–648. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wei, H.R.; Yang, R.D.; Wu, Z.C.; Gao, J.B.; Liu, K.; Wang, X. Discovery and Genesis Discussion on A Early-Cambrian Large-Scale Vanadium Deposit from Eastern Guizhou, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2014, 88, 264–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, L.G.; Mao, J.W. Trace element and C-S-Fe geochemistry of Early Cambrian black shales and associated polymetallic Ni-Mo sulfide and vanadium mineralization, South China: Implications for paleoceanic redox variation. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 135, 104210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piper, D.Z. Seawater as the source of minor elements in black shales, phosphorites and other sedimentary rocks. Chem. Geol. 1994, 114, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Breit, G.N.; Wanty, R.B. Vanadium accumulation in carbonaceous rocks—A review of geochemical controls during deposition and diagenesis. Chem. Geol. 1991, 91, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mao, J.W.; Lehmann, B.; Du, A.D.; Zhang, G.D.; Ma, D.S.; Wang, Y.T.; Zeng, M.G.; Kerrich, R. Re-Os Dating of Polymetallic Ni-Mo-PGE-Au Mineralization in Lower Cambrian Black Shales of South China and Its Geologic Significance. Econ. Geol. Bull. Soc. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wen, H.J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Fan, H.F.; Hu, R.Z. Mo isotopes in the Lower Cambrian formation of southern China and its implications on paleo-ocean environment. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 4756–4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Wille, M.; Nägler, T.F.; Lehmann, B.; Schroder, S.; Kramers, J.D. Hydrogen sulphide release to surface waters at the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary. Nature 2008, 453, 767–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jiang, S.Y.; Chen, Y.Q.; Ling, H.F.; Yang, J.H.; Feng, H.Z.; Ni, P. Trace- and rare-earth element geochemistry and Pb-Pb dating of black shales and intercalated Ni-Mo-PGE-Au sulfide ores in Lower Cambrian strata, Yangtze Platform, South China. Miner. Depos. 2006, 41, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, R.D.; Zhu, L.J.; Gao, H.; Zhang, W.H.; Jiang, L.J.; Wang, Q.; Bao, S. A study on Characteristics of the Hydrothermal Vent and Relating Biota at the Cambrian Bottom in Songlin, Zunyi County, Guizhou Province. Geol. Rev. 2005, 5, 481–492. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, R.D.; Wei, H.R.; Bao, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, Q. Submarine Hydrothermal Venting—Flowing Sedimentary Characters of the Cambrian Shanggongtang and Dahebian Barite Deposits Tianzhu County Guizhou Province. Geol. Rev. 2007, 53, 675–680+725–726. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wei, H.R.; Yang, R.; Gao, J.; Chen, J. New evidence for hydrothermal sedimentary genesis of the Ni-Mo deposits in black rock series of the basal Cambrian, Guizhou Province: Discovery of coarse-grained limestones and its geochemical characteristics. Acta Geol. Sin. 2012, 86, 579–589. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, S.R.; Gao, Z.M. Platinum Group Element Sources in the Lower Cambrian Black Shale in the Hunan-Guizhou Region. Sci. China 2000, 30, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mao, J.W.; Zhang, G.D.; Du, A.D.; Wang, Y.T.; Zeng, M.G. Geology, Geochemistry, and Re-Os isotopic dating of the Huangjiawan Ni-Mo-PGE deposit, Zunyi, Guizhou Province-with a discussion of the Polymetallic mineralization of basal Cambrian black shales in South China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2001, 75, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  37. Luo, T.Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.B.; Zhu, D. Mineralization Characteristics of the multi-element-rich strata in the Niutitang formation black shale series, Zunyi, Guizhou, China. Acta Mineral. Sin. 2003, 4, 296–303. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kao, L.S.; Peacor, D.R. A C/MoS2 mixed-layer phase (MoSC) occurring in metalliferous black shales from southern China, and new data on jordisite. Am. Mineral. 2001, 86, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fan, D.L. Polyelement in the lower Cambrian black shale series in southern China. In The Significance of Trace Element in Solving Petrogenetic Problems and Controversies; The Phrastus Publications S A: Athens, Greece, 1983; pp. 447–474. [Google Scholar]
  40. Fan, D.L.; Yang, R.Y.; Huang, Z.X. The Lower Cambrian black shale series and the iridium anomaly in south China. In Academia Sinica, Developments in Geoscience, Contribution to 27th International Geological Congress, Moscow; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1984; pp. 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lott, D.A.; Coveney, R.M.; Murowchick, J.B.; Grauch, R.I. Sedimentary exhalative nickel-molybdenum ores in South China. Econ. Geol. 1999, 94, 1051–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bao, Z.X.; Wan, R.J.; Bao, J.M. Vanadium deposits of black shale in upper Yangtze platform. Yunnan Geol. 2002, 2, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  43. Peacor, D.R.; Coveney, R.M.; Zhao, G.M. Authigenic illite and organic matter: The principal hosts of vanadium in the Mecca Quarry Shale at Velpen, Indiana. Clays Clay Miner. 2000, 48, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, Z.T.; Hu, R.Z.; Han, T.; Wen, H.J.; Mo, B.; Algeo, T.J. Control of V accumulation in organic-rich shales by clay-organic nano-composites. Chem. Geol. 2021, 567, 120100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stearns, H.T. Note on the first discovery of vanadinite in Idaho. Am. Mineral. 1923, 8, 127–128. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ren, M.; Liu, X.L.; Qin, L.P. Geological characteristics and genesis discussion of Qingnugou vanadium deposit. China Mine Eng. 2009, 5, 13–16+33. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fan, X.X. Geological characteristics and genetic analysis of vanadium ore in Qijiaojing, Beishan, Gansu. Gansu Sci. Technol. 2010, 26, 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fu, X.R.; Li, G.W.; Xu, L.G.; Xue, Y.; Sun, N.Y.; Hao, J.H.; Jian, W.; Yan, H.; Ye, H.S.; Ding, J.H. Berndlehmannite: A new V-bearing sulfide mineral from the black-shale-hosted Zhongcun vanadium deposit, South China. Am. Mineral. 2025, 110, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fu, X.R.; Xu, L.G.; Yan, H.; Ye, H.S.; Ding, J.H. Mineralogy and trace element geochemistry of the early Cambrian black-shale-hosted Zhongcun vanadium deposit, southern Qinling, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 155, 105371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, L.F.; Li, Z.H.; Ouyang, Y.P.; Deng, T.; Deng, Y.G.; Xu, D.R. Mannardite as the main vanadium-hosting mineral in black-shale-hosted vanadium deposits, South China. Am. Mineral. 2024, 109, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bi, H.Z.; Whitney, D.L.; Song, S.G.; Zhou, X. HP–UHP eclogites in the East Kunlun Orogen, China: P–T evidence for asymmetric suturing of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Gondwana Res. 2022, 104, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dong, Y.P.; He, D.F.; Sun, S.S.; Liu, X.M.; Zhou, X.H.; Zhang, F.F.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, B.; Zhao, G.C.; Li, J.H. Subduction and accretionary tectonics of the East Kunlun orogen, western segment of the Central China Orogenic System. Earth Sci. Rev. 2018, 186, 231–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fu, L.B.; Bagas, L.; Wei, J.H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.J.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Z.X.; Li, A.B.; Zhang, W.K. Growth of early Paleozoic continental crust linked to the Proto-Tethys subduction and continental collision in the East Kunlun Orogen, northern Tibetan Plateau. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2022, 135, 1709–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jin, C.; Cheng, Z.G.; Zhang, Z.C.; Hou, T.; Xu, L.J. Petrogenesis of the Wushi carbonatites in the northwestern Tarim Basin: Implications to deep carbon recycling. Lithos 2023, 464–465, 107448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Song, S.G.; Bi, H.Z.; Qi, S.S.; Yang, L.M.; Allen, M.B.; Niu, Y.L.; Su, L.; Li, W.F. HP–UHP metamorphic belt in the East Kunlun Orogen: Final closure of the Proto-Tethys Ocean and formation of the Pan-North-China continent. J. Petrol. 2018, 59, 2043–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, J.P.; Dong, Y.P.; Ma, L.C.; Chen, S.Y.; Jiang, W. Devonian to Triassic tectonic evolution and basin transition in the East Kunlun–Qaidam area, northern Tibetan Plateau: Constraints from stratigraphy and detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2021, 134, 1967–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yu, M.; Dick, J.M.; Feng, C.Y.; Li, B.; Wang, H. The tectonic evolution of the East Kunlun Orogen, northern Tibetan Plateau: A critical review with an integrated geodynamic model. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2020, 191, 104168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Che, Y.Y.; Su, H.M.; Liu, T.; Li, H.; He, S.Y. The occurrence and enrichment of cobalt in skarn Pb-Zn deposits: A case study of the Niukutou Co-rich deposit, East Kunlun metallogenic belt, western China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 172, 106210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fan, X.Z.; Sun, F.Y.; Xu, C.H.; Xin, W.; Wang, Y.C.; Zhang, Y. Genesis of Harizha Ag–Pb–Zn deposit in the eastern Kunlun Orogen, NW China: Evidence of fluid inclusions and C–H–O–S–Pb isotopes. Resour. Geol. 2021, 71, 177–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Peng, Y.; Ma, Y.S.; Liu, C.L.; Sun, J.P.; Hu, Z.Y.; Mou, H.L.; Zheng, C. SHRIMP zircon ages of the Dagangou volcanic rocks in the Eastern Kunlun orogenic belt and their implications. Geol. Bull. China 2016, 35, 356–363. [Google Scholar]
  61. Qu, H.Y.; Zhang, B.W.; Friehauf, K.; Wang, H.; Feng, C.Y.; Dick, J.M.; Yu, M. Apatite as a record of ore-forming processes: Magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of the Hutouya Cu–Fe–Pb–Zn ore district in the Qiman Tagh Metallogenic Belt, NW China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 154, 105343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yu, M.; Zeng, Q.H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.D.; Mao, J.W.; Feng, C.Y. Lithospheric influence on metallogenesis in the East Kunlun Orogen: Insights from isotopic and geochemical mapping. J. Geochem. Explor. 2024, 263, 107515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, A.K.; Yuan, W.M.; Liu, G.L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.X.; Sun, F.F.; Liu, Z.G. Metallogenic regularities and exploration directions of strategic metallic minerals around the Qiadan Basin. Earth Sci. Front. 2024, 31, 260–283. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, R.L.; Yuan, F.; Deng, Y.F.; Xu, H.Q.; Zhou, T.F.; Wang, F.Y.; Wang, Z.Q.; Li, Y.; Han, J.J.; Zhang, F.F. Implications of garnet composition on metallogenic chronology and ore-forming fluid evolution of skarn deposits: A case study of the Kendekeke Fe-polymetallic deposit in East Kunlun. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 168, 106020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, X.M.; Li, Y.J.; Zhang, S.T.; Li, W.W.; Xu, C.W.; Kamradt, A.; Borg, G.; Wei, J.H. Geochronology, pyrite trace elements, and in-situ S isotopes of the giant Nagengkangqie’er silver deposit in the Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt, Northern Tibetan Plateau. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 162, 105696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, T.; Wang, B.Z.; Yuan, B.W.; Li, Y.L.; Li, J.Q.; Zhai, G.L.; Ma, L.; Li, W.F.; Han, X.L.; Feng, J.P.; et al. Exploration Progress and Prospecting Prospect of Alkaline Rock-carbonate-type Niobium Deposit in the Dagele Area, East Kunlun. Geotecton. Metallog. 2024, 48, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang, B.Z.; Pan, T.; Li, W.F.; Xu, G.; Liu, J.D.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, C.T.; Jin, T.T. Petrogenesis of layered Devonian granites in the Jinshuikou area of East Kunlun and its prospecting significance. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2024, 40, 827–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hui, C.; Sun, F.Y.; Yang, Y.Q.; Bakht, S.; Tian, T.; Yu, T.; Qiao, J.F.; Chen, X.S.; Liu, C.X.; Zhang, Y.J. Geology and genesis of the newly identified Early-Devonian Hatuzhongyou REE deposit, NW China: Insights from petrology, geochemistry, and isotopes. Geosci. Front. 2025, 16, 102174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Q.S.; Tian, T.; He, L.; Liu, C.Z. The discovery of the first vanadium deposit in Qinghai Province and its significance. Geol. Bull. China 2020, 39, 330–337. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, B.R.; Ma, Z.X.; Zhang, L.B.; Wang, X.Y.; Yan, Z.P. Zircon U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry and geological significance of Xiarihamu granodiorite in Eastern Kunlun orogenic belt, Qinghai. Glob. Geol. 2018, 21, 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sun, F.Y.; Li, B.L.; Ding, Q.F. Research Report on Major Mineral Exploration Challenges in the East Kunlun Metallogenic Belt; Institute of Geological Survey, Jilin University: Changchun, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  72. Yuan, C.; Zhou, M.F.; Sun, M.; Zhao, Y.J.; Wilde, S.; Long, X.P.; Yan, D.P. Triassic granitoids in the eastern Songpan Ganzi Fold Belt, SW China: Magmatic response to geodynamics of the deep lithosphere. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010, 290, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shi, L.C.; Cai, H.J.; Xu, H.Q.; Xu, B.; Wei, Y.N.; Zhao, M.F. Material composition characteristics of Naijtal Group in subduction accretion complex on the southern slope of East Kunlun Mountains. Geol. Bull. China 2017, 36, 251–257. [Google Scholar]
  74. Gao, Y.L.; Xiao, X.C.; Chang, C.F. Division of Tectonic Units and Geological Characteristics of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Its Adjacent Areas; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1988; pp. 25–97. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, X.F.; Tian, T.; Zhao, L.Z.; Zhang, Q.C. Detailed Exploration Report on the Dagangou Vanadium Deposit in Golmud City, Qinghai Province; No. 5 Institute of Geological Exploration of Qinghai Province: Xining, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang, S.H.; Zhang, M.; Xin, L.J. Determination of Platinum Group Elements in Graphite rock sample by ICP-MS. Chin. J. Inorg. Anal. Chem. 2019, 9, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  77. Gao, K.; Lu, Q.F.; Qin, S.J. Advances in Geochemistry Research of Platinum Group Elements in Coals. Coal Technol. 2016, 35, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  78. Qi, L.; Huang, X.W. A Review on Platinum-group Elements and Re-Os Isotopic Analyses of Geological Samples. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2013, 2, 171–189. [Google Scholar]
  79. Henderson, P.; Yuan, H.L. A Compendium of Geochemistry-from Solar Nebula to the Human Brain; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA; Oxford, UK, 2000; 475p. [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson, S.C.; Large, R.R.; Coveney, R.M.; Kelley, K.D.; Slack, J.F.; Steadman, J.A.; Gregory, D.D.; Sack, P.J.; Meffre, S. Secular distribution of highly metalliferous black shales corresponds with peaks in past atmosphere oxygenation. Miner. Depos. 2017, 52, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McLennan, J.C.; Ungersma, J. Accident prevention in competitive cycling. J. Saf. Res. 1989, 20, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, T. Some Statistical Characteristics of Crustal Element Abundance. Geol. Prospect. 1992, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  83. Taylor, S.R.; McLennan, S.M. The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  84. Choi, J.H.; Hariya, Y. Geochemistry and depositional environment of Mn oxide deposits in the Tokoro Belt, northeastern Hokkaido, Japan. Econ. Geol. 1992, 87, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jewell, P.W.; Stallard, R.F. Geochemistry and Paleoceanographic Setting of Central Nevada Bedded Barites. J. Geol. 1991, 99, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cronan, D.S. Deep-sea nodules. In Marine Manganese Deposits; Glasby, G.P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1977; pp. 11–44. [Google Scholar]
  87. Toth, J.R. Deposition of submarine crusts rich in manganese and iron. GSA Bull. 1980, 91, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, Y.Y.; Guo, W.Y.; Zhang, G.D. Application of Geochemical Indicators for Determining the Sedimentary Environment of the Funing Group, Jinhu Sag. J. Tongji Univ. 1979, 2, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu, Y.J.; Cao, L.M. Elemental Geochemistry; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wasson, J.T. Meteorites: Their Record of Early Solar System History; WH Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  91. Keays, R.R.; Nickle, E.H.; Groves, D.I.; McGoldrick, P.J. Iridium and palladium as discriminants of volcanic-exhalative, hydrothermal, and magmatic nickel sulfide mineralization. Econ. Geol. 1982, 77, 1535–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sun, X.M.; Wang, S.W.; Sun, W.D.; Shi, G.Y.; Sun, Y.L.; Xiong, D.X.; Du, A.D. PGE geochemistry and Re-Os dating of massive sulfide ores from the Baimazhai Cu-Ni deposit, Yunnan province, China. Lithos 2008, 105, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jones, B.; Manning, D.A.C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox condition in ancient mudstones. Chem. Geol. 1994, 111, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yarine, K.M.; Murray, R.W.; Lyons, T.W.; Peterson, L.C.; Haug, G.H. Oxygenation history of bottom waters in the Cariaco Basin, Venezuela, over the past 578000 years: Results from redox-sensitive metals (Mo, V, Mn, and Fe). Paleoceanography 2000, 15, 593. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wignall, P.B.; Twitchett, R.J. Oceanic anoxia and the end Permian mass extinction. Science 1996, 272, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Algeo, T.J.; Tribovillard, N. Environmental analysis of paleoceanographic systems based on molybdenum-uranium covariation. Chem. Geol. 2009, 268, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tribovillard, N.; Algeo, T.J.; Lyons, T.; Riboulleau, A. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: An update. Chem. Geol. 2006, 232, 12–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wignall, P. Black Shales; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1994; pp. 1–127. [Google Scholar]
  99. Rona, P.A.; Scott, S.D. A special issue on sea-floor hydrothermal mineralization: New perspectives, Preface. Econ. Geol. 1993, 88, 1935–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Elderfield, H.; Greaves, M.J. The rare earth element distribution in seawater. Nature 1982, 296, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sholkovitz, E.R.; Schneider, D.L. Cerium redox cycles and rare earth elements in the Sargasso Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1991, 55, 2737–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Debaar, H.J.W.; Bacon, M.P.; Brewer, P.G. Rare earth elements in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1985, 45, 1943–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wild, P.; Quinby-Hunt, M.S.; Erdtmann, B.-D. The whole-rock cerium anomaly: A potential of eustatic sea-level changes in shales of the anoxic facies. Sediment. Geol. 1996, 101, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, L.S.; Zhang, F.X.; Hou, J.F.; Fang, B.; Zhou, Y. Trace element geochemical characteristics of the Shuigoukou Formation black rock series in Shanyang area of the Qinling Mountains and their indication significance for sedimentation-mineralization. Geol. China 2012, 39, 311–325. [Google Scholar]
  105. Morad, S.; Felitsyn, S. Identification of primary Ce-anomaly signatures in fossil biogenic apatite: Implication for the Cambrian oceanic anoxia and phosphogenesis. Sediment. Geol. 2001, 143, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Murray, R.W.; Marilyn, R.; Buchholtz, T.B.; Jones, D.L.; Gerlach, D.C.; Russ, G.P. Rare earth elements as indicators of different marine depositional environments in chert and shale. Geology 1990, 18, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Han, T.; Fan, H.F.; Wen, H.J. Dwindling vanadium in seawater during the early Cambrian, South China. Chem. Geol. 2018, 492, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Murray, R.W. Chemical criteria to identify the depositional of chert: General principles and application. Sediment. Geol. 1994, 90, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sugisaki, R.; Yamamoto, K.; Adachi, M. Triassic bedded cherts in central Japan are not pelagic. Nature 1982, 298, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Moller, P.; Dulski, P.; Bau, M. Rare-Earth Element adsorption in a seawater profile above the east pacific rise. Chem. Erde-Geochem. 1994, 54, 129–149. [Google Scholar]
  111. Taylor, S.R. Geochemistry of loess, continental crustal composition and crustal modal ages. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1983, 47, 1897–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhao, Z.H. Controlling Factors of Europium Geochemical Characteristics. J. Nanjing Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 1993, 5, 271–280. [Google Scholar]
  113. Wood, S.A.; Tait, C.D.; Vlassopoulos, D. Solubility and spectroscopic studies of the interaction of platinum with simple carboxylic acids and fulvic acid at low temperature. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Quinby-Hunt, M.S.; Wilde, P. The provenance of low-calcic black shales. Miner. Depos. 1991, 26, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Luo, Q.X.; Hui, B.; Dong, Y.P.; He, D.F.; Sun, S.S.; Yue, Y.G.; Ren, X.; Zhang, B.; Zang, R.T.; Li, Y.C. Early Ediacaran Xueqiong ophiolite in the East Kunlun Orogen, northern Tibetan Plateau: Insights into the early evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Precambr. Res. 2025, 417, 107638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, Y.F.; Pei, X.Z.; Ding, S.P.; Li, R.B.; Feng, J.Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, Z.C.; Chen, Y.X. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age of quartz diorite at the Kekesha area of Dulan County, eastern section of the East Kunlun orogenic belt, China and its significance. Geol. Bull. China 2010, 29, 79–85. [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhang, Y.L.; Hu, D.G.; Shi, Y.R.; Lu, L. SHRIMP zircon U-Pb ages and tectonic significance of Maoniushan Formation volcanic rocks in East Kunlun orogenic belt, China. Geoscience 2010, 29, 1614–1618. [Google Scholar]
  118. Wang, X.D. Neoproterozoic to Early Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution in the East Kunlun Orogen and the North Qaidam Orogen; Lanzhou University: Lanzhou, China, 2023; 174p. [Google Scholar]
  119. Feng, D.; Wang, C.; Song, S.G.; Xiong, L.; Zhang, G.B.; Allen, M.B.; Dong, J.; Wen, T.; Su, L. Tracing tectonic processes from Proto- to Paleo-Tethys in the East Kunlun Orogen by detrital zircons. Gondwana Res. 2022, 115, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, S.J.; Sun, F.Y.; Gao, Y.W.; Zhao, J.W.; Li, L.S.; Yang, Q.A. The Theoretical Guidance and the practice of small intrusions forming large deposits-the enlightenment and significance for searching breakthrough of Cu-Ni sulfide deposit in Xiarihamu, East Kunlun, Qinghai. Northwest. Geol. 2012, 45, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  121. Song, X.Y.; Yi, J.N.; Chen, L.M.; She, Y.W.; Liu, C.Z.; Dang, X.Y.; Yang, Q.A.; Wu, S.K. The giant Xiarihamu Ni-Co sulfide deposit in the east Kunlun Orogenic Belt, northern Tibet Plateau, China. Econ. Geol. 2016, 111, 29–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, Z.W.; Wang, Y.L.; Qian, B.; Liu, Y.G.; Zhang, D.Y.; Lü, P.R.; Dong, J. Metallogeny and tectonomagmatic setting of Ni-Cu magmatic sulfide mineralization, number I Shitoukengde mafic-ultramafic complex, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 96, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Jia, L.H.; Mao, J.W.; Li, B.L.; Zhang, D.Y.; Sun, T.T. Geochronology and petrogenesis of the late Silurian Shitoukengde mafic–ultramafic intrusion, NW China: Implications for the tectonic setting and magmatic Ni-Cu mineralization in the East Kunlun Orogenic Belt. Int. Geol. Rev. 2020, 63, 549–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chen, W.; Chen, L.M.; Yu, S.Y.; Li, D.P.; Kang, J.; Huang, H.L.; Wu, S.K.; Wang, Z.A. Geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic implications for the petrogenesis of the late Silurian Shitoukengde mafic–ultramafic intrusion in the East Kunlun Orogen, NW China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 173, 106264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Duan, X.P.; Meng, F.C.; Wang, Z.Q.; Yu, X.F. Metallogenic characteristics of Shitoukengde intrusion and its implications for Ni-Co-(Cu) sulfide mineralization in East Kunlun. China Geol. 2024, 7, 714–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Guo, X.Z.; Jia, Q.Z.; Li, J.C.; Kong, H.L.; Yao, X.G.; Mi, J.R.; Qian, B.; Wang, Y. Zircon U-Pb Geochronology and geochemistry and their geological significances of eclogites from East Kunlun high-pressure metamorphic belt. Earth Sci. 2018, 43, 4300–4318. [Google Scholar]
  127. Li, R.B.; Pei, X.Z.; Li, Z.C.; Patias, D.; Su, Z.G.; Pei, L.; Chen, G.C.; Chen, Y.X.; Liu, C.J. Late Silurian to Early Devonian volcanics in the East Kunlun orogen, northern Tibetan Plateau: Record of postcollisional magmatism related to the evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. J. Geodyn. 2020, 140, 101780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lu, L.; Wu, Z.H.; Hu, D.G.; Barosh, P.J.; Hao, S.; Zhou, C.J. Zircon U-Pb age for rhyolite of the Maoniushan Formation and its tectonic significance in the East Kunlun Mountains. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2010, 26, 1150–1158. [Google Scholar]
  129. Chen, J.; Wang, B.Z.; Lu, H.F.; Li, B.; Li, J.Q.; Li, Y.L.; Shu, S.L. Geochronology and geochemistry of Early Devonian intrusions in the Qimantagh area, Northwest China: Evidence for post-collisional slab break-off. Int. Geol. Rev. 2018, 60, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chen, J.; Wang, B.Z.; Yu, F.C.; Han, J.; Li, W.F. Cessation of collisional tectonism and rapid crustal uplift recorded by 430-420 Ma igneous rocks in the South Kunlun belt, northwest China. Int. Geol. Rev. 2022, 64, 2584–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ding, Q.F.; Song, K.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, W.; Liu, F. Zircon U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic constraints on the petrogenesis of the late Silurian Shidonggou granite from the Wulonggou area in the Eastern Kunlun Orogen, Northwest China. Int. Geol. Rev. 2019, 61, 1666–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, R.B.; Pei, X.Z.; Zhou, R.J.; Li, Z.C.; Pei, L.; Chen, G.C.; Chen, Y.X.; Liu, C.J. Magmatic response to the closure of the Proto-Tethys Ocean: A case study from the middle Paleozoic granitoids in the Kunlun Orogen, western China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2023, 242, 105513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yan, J.M.; Sun, G.S.; Sun, F.Y.; Li, L.; Li, H.R.; Gao, Z.H.; Hua, L.; Yan, Z.P. Geochronology, geochemistry, and Hf isotopic compositions of monzogranites and mafic-ultramafic complexes in the Maxingdawannan Area, Eastern Kunlun Orogen, western China: Implications for magma sources, geodynamic setting, and petrogenesis. J. Earth Sci. 2019, 30, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wang, K.X.; Yang, J.J.; Dai, J.W.; Yu, C.D.; Liu, X.D.; Lei, Y.L.; Bonnetti, C.; Sun, L.Q.; Liu, W.H. Petrogenesis of Paleozoic trachyte and rhyolite in the Haidewula area, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, and their implications for uranium mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 167, 105963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Fu, X.R.; Xu, L.G.; Ding, J.H. Metallogenic regularity and prospecting area selection of sedimentary vanadium deposit in China. Miner. Depos. 2021, 40, 1160–1181. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhu, H.Z.; Hou, J.F.; Wang, S.L. Geological and geochemical characteristics and vanadium enrichment regularity of the Qianjiaping vanadium deposit in southern Qinling Mountain. Geol. China 2010, 37, 1490–1500, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  137. Zhang, Y.B. Study of the Early Devonian Black Shale-Hosted Vanadium Deposits in Shanglin of Guangxi Province, China; Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences: Guiyang, China, 2015; 159p. [Google Scholar]
  138. Li, W.D.; Ge, X.J.; Jia, J.D. Analysis On Vanadium Occurrence Characteristics in Hami Dashuixi Vanadium deposit. Xinjiang Geol. 2013, 2, 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  139. Li, W.D.; Lu, H.F.; Shi, L.M. Geological characteristics of the black rock series of the Dashuixi vanadium deposit and genesis analysis, Xinjiang. Miner. Explor. 2013, 3, 266–272. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Simplified tectonic map of China (after [52]). (b) Outline of tectonic map of East Kunlun Orogen Belt showing three major faults and tectonic belts (modified from [21,23]). (c) Simple map of the stratum distribution of Naij Tal Group. NEKF: Northern East Kunlun fault, CEKF: Central East Kunlun fault, SEKF: Southern East Kunlun fault, ATF: Altyn Tagh strike-slip fault, WWF: Wenquangou–Wahongshan fault, NKB: Caledonian back-arc basin of Northern East Kunlun Belt, CKB: uplifted granitic basement of Central East Kunlun Belt, SKB: composite accretion of the Southern East Kunlun Belt, AOB: A’nyemaqen Ophiolitic Belt.
Figure 1. (a) Simplified tectonic map of China (after [52]). (b) Outline of tectonic map of East Kunlun Orogen Belt showing three major faults and tectonic belts (modified from [21,23]). (c) Simple map of the stratum distribution of Naij Tal Group. NEKF: Northern East Kunlun fault, CEKF: Central East Kunlun fault, SEKF: Southern East Kunlun fault, ATF: Altyn Tagh strike-slip fault, WWF: Wenquangou–Wahongshan fault, NKB: Caledonian back-arc basin of Northern East Kunlun Belt, CKB: uplifted granitic basement of Central East Kunlun Belt, SKB: composite accretion of the Southern East Kunlun Belt, AOB: A’nyemaqen Ophiolitic Belt.
Minerals 16 00163 g001
Figure 2. (a) Simplified geological map of the Dagangou area. (b) Section of drilling exploration line and sample location.
Figure 2. (a) Simplified geological map of the Dagangou area. (b) Section of drilling exploration line and sample location.
Minerals 16 00163 g002
Figure 3. Surface ore characteristics of the Dagangou vanadium deposit. (a) Conformable contact between carbonaceous slate (left) and dolomite (right). (b) Massive carbonaceous slate ore. (c) Powdery carbonaceous slate ore. (d) Massive carbonaceous siliceous slate ore.
Figure 3. Surface ore characteristics of the Dagangou vanadium deposit. (a) Conformable contact between carbonaceous slate (left) and dolomite (right). (b) Massive carbonaceous slate ore. (c) Powdery carbonaceous slate ore. (d) Massive carbonaceous siliceous slate ore.
Minerals 16 00163 g003
Figure 4. Hand specimen and microstructural characteristics of Dagangou vanadium ore. (a) Carbonaceous siliceous slate core sample. (b) Carbonaceous slate core sample. (c) Quartz veinlet (plane-polarized light). (d) Clay mineral aggregate (crossed-polarized light). (e) Anhedral granular pyrite (plane-polarized light). (f) Carbonaceous aggregate (reflected light).
Figure 4. Hand specimen and microstructural characteristics of Dagangou vanadium ore. (a) Carbonaceous siliceous slate core sample. (b) Carbonaceous slate core sample. (c) Quartz veinlet (plane-polarized light). (d) Clay mineral aggregate (crossed-polarized light). (e) Anhedral granular pyrite (plane-polarized light). (f) Carbonaceous aggregate (reflected light).
Minerals 16 00163 g004
Figure 5. Normalized trace element spider diagrams for different rock types in the Dagangou vanadium deposit (normalization values follow [79]).
Figure 5. Normalized trace element spider diagrams for different rock types in the Dagangou vanadium deposit (normalization values follow [79]).
Minerals 16 00163 g005
Figure 6. PAAS-normalized REE + Y distribution patterns of different rocks from the Dagangou vanadium deposit (PAAS values follow [81]).
Figure 6. PAAS-normalized REE + Y distribution patterns of different rocks from the Dagangou vanadium deposit (PAAS values follow [81]).
Minerals 16 00163 g006
Figure 9. Diagrams of Al2O3-TiO2, SiO2-TiO2, MnO-TiO2, and Sc-TiO2 for the Dagangou vanadium deposit.
Figure 9. Diagrams of Al2O3-TiO2, SiO2-TiO2, MnO-TiO2, and Sc-TiO2 for the Dagangou vanadium deposit.
Minerals 16 00163 g009
Figure 10. Zn-Ni-Co ternary diagram for different rock types from the Dagangou vanadium deposit (base map follows [84]).
Figure 10. Zn-Ni-Co ternary diagram for different rock types from the Dagangou vanadium deposit (base map follows [84]).
Minerals 16 00163 g010
Figure 11. U-Mo covariation diagram of the Dagangou vanadium ore (base map follows [98]).
Figure 11. U-Mo covariation diagram of the Dagangou vanadium ore (base map follows [98]).
Minerals 16 00163 g011
Figure 12. Th-Hf/3-Ta diagram (base map follows [114]). I: N-type MORB. II: intraplate tholeiitic basalt, III: intraplate alkaline basalt, IV: divergent plate margins.
Figure 12. Th-Hf/3-Ta diagram (base map follows [114]). I: N-type MORB. II: intraplate tholeiitic basalt, III: intraplate alkaline basalt, IV: divergent plate margins.
Minerals 16 00163 g012
Table 1. Major element composition (wt.%) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Table 1. Major element composition (wt.%) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Sample No.Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y10Y11Y12Y13Y14Y15
LithologyDolomiteArgillaceous SlateCrystalline LimestoneCarbonaceous SlateCarbonaceous Siliceous Slate
SiO235.5530.8728.9573.9469.7261.180.859.9937.4356.4427.0332.9443.0762.1768.03
TiO20.220.190.110.620.580.680.030.030.230.530.160.170.780.680.23
Al2O35.382.731.9313.2411.5513.980.200.302.116.764.271.499.4613.167.27
TFe2O32.434.451.082.574.248.120.180.6210.326.706.575.952.915.313.53
MnO0.451.490.420.030.090.180.020.030.090.040.050.040.010.090.11
MgO10.2010.4813.720.881.682.6321.6518.760.280.900.610.281.641.950.88
CaO16.8025.3322.770.462.800.8330.1528.568.779.314.891.3213.393.494.11
Na2O0.150.130.630.721.072.730.050.020.490.520.100.080.570.081.06
K2O2.510.390.453.012.873.120.010.081.752.230.970.412.963.251.83
P2O50.160.170.040.080.090.130.020.020.950.763.630.930.690.112.64
LOI23.3228.8731.593.735.054.2245.9541.6422.2613.4345.6749.9717.737.764.94
n(SiO2)/n(Al2O3)6.6111.3215.045.596.044.384.3333.5117.738.366.3222.174.554.729.36
n(Al2O3)/n(Al2O3 + TFe2O3)0.690.380.640.840.730.630.530.330.170.650.390.200.760.710.67
n(TFe2O3)/n(TiO2)11.1023.799.604.167.2611.935.5923.8645.426.94117.0982.513.737.7815.29
n(Al)/n(Al + Fe + Mn)0.580.250.490.790.670.560.430.260.130.430.330.160.710.650.60
n(MnO)/n(TiO2)2.067.963.680.050.160.270.531.010.410.080.290.240.010.130.48
Table 2. Trace element composition (in mg/kg) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Table 2. Trace element composition (in mg/kg) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Sample No.Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y10Y11Y12Y13Y14Y15Upper Crustal
Abundance
LithologyDolomiteArgillaceous SlateCrystalline LimestoneCarbonaceous SlateCarbonaceous Siliceous Slate
Li9.637.931.8533.4232.2536.532.232.4315.2630.7541.917.5639.8432.4214.5523
Be0.981.560.262.371.911.650.040.112.654.609.775.966.762.091.343.2
B35.5814.675.2177.5537.19102.53.342.763.3254.043.223.0190.2733.6553.0912
Sc5.964.933.3213.3810.2618.230.680.707.5615.926.682.0316.6812.436.8014
V58.4823.9967.60103.469.4683.1016.8112.252368323469345830391387.14153.7140
Cr53.6736.2821.7497.39106.368.5730.1015.63165.7215.4332.7160.3215.9107.369.2469
Co10.2534.896.486.204.6052.791.301.193.987.4220.7118.5611.5115.4512.5017
Ni18.7341.0913.4923.1826.82189.217.129.2245.0298.46479.3551.791.2152.5734.5155
Cu22.094.378.8243.9015.24465.92.032.67159.7207.9329.2165.8162.634.1871.2439
Zn46.8025.2527.8642.5438.80110.340.4615.6097.16190.716151612170.661.8362.5067
Ga918.7131.0139.6353.378.53790.21.4916.95247.8959.1172.6303.01082.0153.6890.818
Ge2.323.551.183.623.888.040.220.546.235.394.594.575.284.613.431.5
As30.9132.0527.8835.8027.9047.6925.9629.53139.8161.7090.08166.3155.027.6729.441.6
Se1.000.980.873.121.291.730.780.8017.2923.2834.7731.6215.112.942.800.14
Rb67.5527.6512.73150.7137.9093.041.023.0359.0096.7442.6922.23119.8145.864.23110
Sr391.3418.4303.246.0181.9258.2576.66189.00746.9479.3416.3997.1503.477.83367.7350
Zr58.4542.4025.69173.8190.10248.21.132.0695.73151.7080.8757.37188.70176.775.58170
Nb6.484.822.7113.8712.4417.530.140.216.9520.657.696.0628.8814.546.5215
Mo1.360.910.611.310.830.870.260.63112.00170.70375.50395.10221.603.894.111.6
Ag0.120.060.070.610.210.280.020.076.681.325.3910.831.570.290.380.06
Cd0.600.440.811.141.191.700.260.102.725.7023.8121.776.711.200.980.1
Sn1.681.120.563.783.153.000.100.331.823.450.930.703.783.712.443.3
Sb6.966.948.294.553.533.819.229.7629.5360.6516.7469.6269.735.046.180.2
Te0.060.080.060.080.070.330.020.040.240.410.880.280.580.050.060.003
Cs2.861.730.299.005.105.510.030.063.074.782.722.017.125.293.183.7
Ba2185297631667465142517,22041.32530.20542321,9303635636825,250302919,860570
Hf1.600.960.675.045.346.830.030.061.963.381.440.664.555.042.194
Ta0.610.410.301.281.161.410.290.180.591.510.390.162.081.360.671.5
W1.691.130.912.231.780.770.090.581.914.703.564.145.632.261.761.3
Au0.030.030.020.040.040.050.020.020.030.070.040.050.090.050.030.0023
Tl0.580.160.160.930.750.690.030.052.712.023.753.072.420.860.710.53
Pb14.947.6922.0717.877.1311.771.142.4874.78118.1050.9956.58136.2011.0116.1917
Bi0.210.110.170.470.220.450.010.010.430.530.510.350.640.300.330.05
Th6.083.342.8316.8014.2113.100.120.455.3210.303.171.1715.3016.358.6711
U2.170.670.973.041.801.901.750.3746.0236.53255.10282.9064.682.856.062.8
U/Th0.360.200.340.180.130.1515.140.828.663.5580.42241.594.230.170.70
V/V + Ni0.760.370.830.820.720.310.500.570.980.970.940.910.980.620.82
V/Sc9.814.8720.397.736.774.5624.8017.59313.35203.141037.42874.7234.597.0122.59
V/Cr1.090.663.111.060.651.210.560.7814.2915.0120.8436.3718.120.812.22
Ni/Co1.831.182.083.745.833.5813.217.7311.3113.2823.1429.737.923.402.76
Sr/Ba0.020.140.100.010.060.001.860.360.140.020.110.160.020.030.02
Co/Zn0.221.380.230.150.120.480.030.080.040.040.010.010.070.250.20
Table 3. Rare earth element composition (in mg/kg) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Table 3. Rare earth element composition (in mg/kg) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Sample No.Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y10Y11Y12Y13Y14Y15
LithologyDolomiteArgillaceous SlateCrystalline LimestoneCarbonaceous SlateCarbonaceous Siliceous Slate
La18.7313.015.3338.6538.1542.890.401.1826.6879.5971.9863.12110.2041.7830.75
Ce37.9028.3713.8372.8775.4685.760.772.2332.2591.3748.5731.65127.6080.1859.40
Pr4.273.021.228.418.679.600.110.307.1317.9616.749.5525.299.277.53
Nd15.8811.234.3529.4330.8134.390.391.1531.8467.5272.1838.4092.9432.6727.67
Sm3.382.280.885.495.947.370.120.267.6912.6416.288.2015.996.325.97
Eu3.350.960.581.751.293.440.050.182.275.234.413.036.131.533.79
Gd3.772.470.864.915.417.520.190.277.4313.9922.2614.3815.895.796.62
Tb0.490.370.120.700.801.160.040.041.112.273.492.482.360.841.01
Dy2.722.220.704.034.586.760.320.226.5415.0123.1618.6115.084.846.05
Ho0.580.500.150.840.961.450.100.051.403.605.585.033.570.991.26
Er1.611.520.442.542.734.310.360.124.1311.2617.0016.6211.172.873.65
Tm0.230.220.070.390.410.650.060.020.591.672.402.431.690.420.54
Yb1.391.430.392.552.514.210.470.093.7310.5814.7314.7310.832.733.39
Lu0.210.220.060.390.380.650.080.020.581.652.202.271.720.410.53
Y16.4815.224.5420.5924.5336.172.971.2841.11115.60207.20218.80115.8025.3934.62
w(ΣREE)94.5167.8229.00172.95178.10210.163.446.10133.37334.33320.98230.49440.46190.63158.15
w(ΣLREE)83.5058.8726.19156.59160.32183.451.815.28107.86274.31230.16153.95378.15171.75135.11
w(ΣHREE)11.008.952.8116.3617.7826.711.630.8225.5160.0290.8276.5562.3018.8823.05
δCe0.981.051.260.930.960.980.880.880.550.560.330.280.560.940.91
δEu2.861.232.001.010.681.400.922.010.911.200.710.841.160.761.83
Y/Ho28.5030.7329.7524.3825.5924.9331.2527.7029.3632.1437.1243.4732.4325.7127.56
La/Yb13.479.0913.6315.1315.1810.180.8413.327.157.524.894.2910.1815.309.07
(La:Sm)N3.493.603.814.434.043.662.162.902.183.962.784.844.344.163.24
(La:Yb)N9.086.139.1910.2010.236.860.568.984.825.073.292.896.8610.316.11
(Sm:Nd)N0.650.620.620.570.590.660.920.680.740.580.690.660.530.590.66
(Gd:Yb)N2.191.391.781.551.741.440.332.491.601.071.220.791.181.711.58
Table 4. Platinum group element compositions (in ppb) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
Table 4. Platinum group element compositions (in ppb) of Dagangou vanadium deposit samples.
LithologyPtPdOsIrRuRhw(Pd)/w(Pt)w(Pt + Pd)/w(Os + Ru + Ir + Rh)w(Pt)/w(Ir)
Carbonaceous slate 0122.3290.20.260.082.254.994.0414.85293.3
Carbonaceous slate 0211.751.31.220.290.952.274.3813.3239.93
Carbonaceous slate 0310.6400.570.380.972.013.7712.8627.6
Carbonaceous slate 0410.337.11.190.570.491.653.612.1518.01
Carbonaceous slate 0512.0736.10.370.081.331.652.9914.06157.3
Average13.450.940.720.281.22.51///
Carbonaceous siliceous slate 016.6818.90.60.430.751.282.83 8.36 15.53
Carbonaceous siliceous slate 026.42150.170.490.340.732.34 12.38 13.10
Average6.5516.950.390.460.551.01///
Argillaceous slate 014.095.320.110.30.630.151.30 7.91 13.63
Argillaceous slate 021.923.470.20.920.710.211.81 2.64 2.09
Argillaceous slate 032.243.150.160.30.720.21.41 3.91 7.47
Average2.753.980.160.510.690.19///
Dolomite 011.353.090.140.110.560.152.29 4.63 12.27
Dolomite 021.213.090.20.10.20.092.55 7.29 12.10
Dolomite 031.062.680.120.151.120.192.53 2.37 7.07
Average1.212.950.150.120.630.14///
Concentration coefficientcarbonaceous slate2.054.633.610.2811.980.5
Carbonaceous siliceous 11.541.930.465.450.2
argillaceous slate0.420.360.780.516.870.04
dolomite0.180.270.770.126.270.03
Crustal abundance6.53110.210.15
Table 5. The similarities and differences between the Dagangou Vanadium deposit and other vanadium deposits.
Table 5. The similarities and differences between the Dagangou Vanadium deposit and other vanadium deposits.
DepositDagangouQianjiapingShanglinDashuixi
LocationEast Kunlun Orogenic BeltNorthern Yangtze CratonSouthern Yangtze CratonNorthern Margin of the Tarim Basin
Formation timeO-SCDC
Metal associatedMo, Se, Ga, Ag, P, Pt, PdAu, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn, Sb, Ni, Co, PGEStone coal, AgTi, Zn, Co, Mo
Host rocksCarbonaceous slate, carbonaceous siliceous slateNodule-bearing carbonaceous siliceous rock, nodule-bearing mudstone, carbonaceous mudstoneCarbonaceous mudstone, carbonaceous siliceous rockcarbonaceous slate, carbonaceous siliceous rock, carbonaceous mudstone
Main ore mineralsRoscoelite, Limonite, Clay, Feldspar, JarositeRoscoelite, Illite, Chalcopyrite, Azurite, Vanadium titanomagnetiteIllite, Montmorillonite, Kaolinite, Wavallite, Rutile, Goethite, MonaziteRoscoelite, vanadium-bearing muscovite, barium–vanadium mica, vanadium tourmaline, Limonite
Occurrence of VanadiumIsomorphic form within mica minerals (65.84%), in adsorbed form within iron oxides and clay minerals (33.90%)Isomorphic form within mica and illite minerals (70.31%), and adsorbed form within organic matter (20.31%)Isomorphic form within illite (76.47%), adsorbed form within organic matter (23.35%)Isomorphic form within mica minerals and kaolinite (96.65%), independent vanadium minerals (3.29%)
Source of metalsSeawater, submarine hydrothermalSeawater, submarine hydrothermalSeawater, terrigenous calstSeawater, submarine hydrothermal
Sedimentary environmentExtremely anoxic sedimentary environment under marginal sea and continental slope settingsAnoxic sedimentary environment in a bathyal-restricted sedimentary basinAnoxic reducing environment in the neritic trough-basin proximal to the land areaAnoxic reducing environment in a stable marginal shallow marine
Genetic modelHydrothermal-dominated mixedSeawater sedimentaryBiogenic sedimentaryBiogenic sedimentary
Reference [15,23,136][137][138,139]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, T.; Sun, F.; Xu, G.; Miao, G.; Qian, Y.; Qiao, J.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z. Origin of Black Shale-Hosted Dagangou Vanadium Deposit, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China: Evidence from Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Minerals 2026, 16, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020163

AMA Style

Tian T, Sun F, Xu G, Miao G, Qian Y, Qiao J, Wu S, Wang Z. Origin of Black Shale-Hosted Dagangou Vanadium Deposit, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China: Evidence from Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Minerals. 2026; 16(2):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Tao, Fengyue Sun, Guang Xu, Guowen Miao, Ye Qian, Jianfeng Qiao, Shukuan Wu, and Zhian Wang. 2026. "Origin of Black Shale-Hosted Dagangou Vanadium Deposit, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China: Evidence from Mineralogy and Geochemistry" Minerals 16, no. 2: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020163

APA Style

Tian, T., Sun, F., Xu, G., Miao, G., Qian, Y., Qiao, J., Wu, S., & Wang, Z. (2026). Origin of Black Shale-Hosted Dagangou Vanadium Deposit, East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China: Evidence from Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Minerals, 16(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop