Next Article in Journal
Occurrence State and Controlling Factors of Methane in Deep Marine Shale: A Case Study from Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin, SW China
Previous Article in Journal
Recovery of Precious Metals from High-MgO-Content Pt-Pd Concentrates Using a Pyrometallurgical Smelting Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recovery of Fine Rare Earth Minerals from Simulated Tin Tailings by Carrier Magnetic Separation: Selective Heterogeneous Agglomeration with Coarse Magnetite Particles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mineral-Based Synthesis of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles via Co-Precipitation and Microwave Techniques Using Leached Copper Solutions from Mined Minerals

by
Carolina Venegas Abarzúa
1,
Mauricio J. Morel
2,
Gabriela Sandoval-Hevia
3,
Thangavel Kavinkumar
4,
Natarajan Chidhambaram
5,
Sathish Kumar Kamaraj
6,
Nagarajan Dineshbabu
7 and
Arun Thirumurugan
1,*
1
Sede Vallenar, Universidad de Atacama, Av Costanera #105, Vallenar 1612178, Chile
2
Departamento de Química y Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó 1531772, Chile
3
Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Matemáticas y del Medio Ambiente, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Las Palmeras 3360, Ñuñoa 7800003, Región Metropolitana, Chile
4
Centre for Energy and Environment, Department of Physics, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore 641021, India
5
Department of Physics, Rajah Serfoji Government College (Autonomous) (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli), Thanjavur 613005, Tamil Nadu, India
6
Instituto Politécnico Nacional(IPN)-Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, Unidad Altamira (CICATA-Altamira), Carretera Tampico-Puerto Industrial Altamira Km 14.5, Tamps 89600, Mexico
7
Centre for Applied Nanomaterials, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai 600069, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(8), 819; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080819
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 24 July 2025 / Accepted: 29 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025

Abstract

Environmental sustainability and responsible resource utilization are critical global challenges. In this work, we present a sustainable and circular-economy-based approach for synthesizing CuFe2O4 nanoparticles by directly utilizing copper oxide minerals sourced from Chilean mining operations. Copper sulfate (CuSO4) was extracted from these minerals through acid leaching and used as a precursor for nanoparticle synthesis via both chemical co-precipitation and microwave-assisted methods. The influence of different precipitating agents—NaOH, Na2CO3, and NaF—was systematically evaluated. XRD and FESEM analyses revealed that NaOH produced the most phase-pure and well-dispersed nanoparticles, while NaF resulted in secondary phase formation. The microwave-assisted method further improved particle uniformity and reduced agglomeration due to rapid and homogeneous heating. Electrochemical characterization was conducted to assess the suitability of the synthesized CuFe2O4 for supercapacitor applications. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) measurements confirmed pseudocapacitive behavior, with a specific capacitance of up to 1000 F/g at 2 A/g. These findings highlight the potential of CuFe2O4 as a low-cost, high-performance electrode material for energy storage. This study underscores the feasibility of converting primary mined minerals into functional nanomaterials while promoting sustainable mineral valorization. The approach can be extended to other critical metals and mineral residues, including tailings, supporting the broader goals of a circular economy and environmental remediation.

1. Introduction

The global demand for vital minerals and metals, particularly copper, has recently escalated due to its significance in renewable energy technologies, electronics, and the construction of green infrastructure [1,2,3]. Applications in energy storage systems, solar photovoltaics, electric vehicles, and modern electronics depend on copper’s extraordinary electrical and thermal conductivity, corrosion resistance, and catalytic properties. Thus, meeting the objectives of the circular economy and reducing the environmental impact of the usage of mineral resources depend on the sustainable extraction and use of copper. With more than 25% of all copper produced worldwide, Chile continues to be the top copper producer in the world [4,5]. Although the supply of primary copper depends on conventional mining activities, these also produce large amounts of ore wastes, acid mine drainage, and other waste sources that present financial and environmental problems [6,7,8,9]. Energy-intensive and producing harmful emissions, traditional extraction methods including roasting and smelting call for the creation of alternative, low-impact processing technologies. In this regard, hydrometallurgical leaching, especially sulfuric acid leaching, has become a quick and environmentally friendly method for copper extraction from oxide minerals and ores [10,11,12,13].
Simulating industrial acid heap leaching chemistry at a laboratory scale, leaching systems enable the fast generation of high-purity copper sulfate (CuSO4) solutions fit for downstream uses including electrowinning or nanomaterial synthesis [14,15]. Allowing the conversion of mining-derived materials into high-value functional materials, in turn reducing waste and resource loss, fits very nicely with the ideas of sustainable resource management and the circular economy [16,17,18,19]. Copper sulfate has one such exciting use in the synthesis of copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanoparticles, a class of spinel ferrites with special optical, magnetic, and catalytic qualities [20]. Applications for CuFe2O4 nanomaterials span photocatalysis, magnetic separation, sensors, energy storage, environmental remediation, and so forth [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Their great chemical stability, saturation magnetism, and capacity to absorb visible light make them perfect candidates for many purposes in energy and environmental systems. Among the several synthesis techniques for ferrite nanoparticles, the co-precipitation method is particularly simple, cheap, and able to generate nanoparticles with controlled stoichiometry and morphology [29,30,31]. The final phase purity, crystallite size, and particle shape of the ferrite product depend much on the choice of precipitating agents [32,33]. Commonly used agents including NaOH, Na2CO3, and NaF affect the nucleation and growth kinetics and can cause appreciable variations in particle structure and performance [34,35,36,37]. Apart from traditional co-precipitation, microwave-assisted synthesis has attracted interest for its benefits in terms of fast processing, energy economy, and the possibility to create homogeneous and crystalline nanoparticles with lowered agglomeration [38,39,40]. This approach is especially useful for manufacturing high-quality nanomaterials from aqueous precursors since microwaves offer consistent volumetric heating, which stimulates fast nucleation and particle growth.
In this work, CuSO4 solutions were generated by acid leaching copper oxide minerals donated by Chilean state-owned mining company ENAMI Vallenar, Vallenar, Chile. Via co-precipitation and microwave-assisted techniques employing various precipitating agents, these leachates provided the copper source for the synthesis of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles. The ideal conditions for generating high-quality CuFe2O4 were found by means of an extensive analysis of the structural, morphological, and phase properties of the nanoparticles. This integrated approach valorizes mined minerals through low-impact processing and conversion into functional nanomaterials, thus addressing important sustainability goals. The results show that a circular approach to the use of critical minerals is supported by the efficient synthesis of CuFe2O4 from leached copper from mined minerals. Moreover, the study offers a platform for extending similar procedures to other mining-derived products or tailings, thus possibly lowering waste and promoting the growth of environmentally friendly technologies.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The base material used for the synthesis and subsequent leaching processes consisted of mineral oxides donated by ENAMI Vallenar, a Chilean state-owned mining company. The facility is located on the outskirts of Vallenar, along the road to Alto del Carmen, at the coordinates −28.564918906044497, −70.74133301538157. These mineral samples originate from copper oxide ores acquired by ENAMI from small-scale miners in the Province of Huasco. All analytical-grade reagents, including iron(III) chloride (FeCl3), iron(II) sulfate (FeSO4), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium fluoride (NaF), and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of CuSO4 Solution from Minerals

To prepare the Pregnant Leaching Solution (PLS), a leaching process was conducted using copper oxide minerals collected from the Taltal and Cobre Norte mining regions. For each test, 10.000 ± 0.001 g of mineral sample was used. The minerals were first ground to a fine particle size of -#325 mesh, increasing the reactive surface area and enhancing the leaching efficiency. The leaching process involved the addition of 100 mL of 0.1 M sulfuric acid (H2SO4) to the ground mineral in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, as illustrated in Figure S1, which shows minerals in contact with sulfuric acid during the leaching process. This mixture simulates acid heap leaching chemistry but at a laboratory scale and with a finer particle size.
After acid addition, the samples were subjected to orbital shaking at 150 rpm for 30 min to improve the interaction between the acid and the mineral surface. This dynamic leaching setup accelerates metal dissolution compared to traditional static methods. The orbital shaking process is shown in Figure S2, where the samples are visibly agitated to enhance acid penetration and copper ion release.
Following the agitation step, the mixtures were filtered to separate the solid residues from the clear leachate containing dissolved copper. The filtration stage is shown in Figure S3, which captures the post-leaching separation process that yields the Pregnant Leaching Solution (PLS). This approach mimics industrial heap leaching, which typically uses coarser particles (¼ to 1 inch) and requires 3 to 4 weeks for copper extraction. However, the use of fine particles and mechanical agitation in this laboratory protocol significantly shortened the process to just 30 min, while achieving comparable dissolution efficiency. The resulting PLS, rich in Cu2+ ions, was then used to prepare a CuSO4 solution, confirming the effectiveness of this rapid leaching technique for producing high-purity copper solutions suitable for downstream applications such as electrowinning, material synthesis, or analytical calibration standards.

2.3. Synthesis of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles

CuFe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized via a co-precipitation method using CuSO4 solutions extracted from mining resources and FeSO4 as precursor salts. The precipitation process was facilitated by the addition of NaOH, Na2CO3, or NaF, which acted as the precipitating agents. In the first step, CuSO4 and FeSO4 were dissolved in deionized water at room temperature to ensure the homogenous mixing of metal ions. Further, the ferric ions were added to form a divalent and trivalent metal ion mixture. The precipitating agent was then added dropwise under continuous stirring, leading to the formation of a precipitate. The pH was maintained between 9 and 10. The obtained precipitate was then subjected to multiple washing steps with deionized water to remove unreacted salts and byproducts such as Na2SO4 or NaCl. Magnetic separation was employed to collect the nanoparticles efficiently. Finally, the filtered product was dried at 200 °C for 2 h to enhance the crystallinity and phase purity of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles.
The microwave-assisted method was employed for the rapid and efficient synthesis of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, utilizing a CuSO4 solution from mining resources, FeSO4 as precursor salts, and NaOH as the precipitating agent. In this approach, CuSO4 and FeSO4 were dissolved in deionized water at room temperature to ensure the uniform mixing of Cu2+ and Fe2+ ions. Further, the ferric ions were added to form a divalent and trivalent metal ion mixture. The NaOH solution was then added dropwise under continuous stirring to maintain a pH of 9 to 10, facilitating the controlled precipitation of Cu(OH)2 and Fe(OH)2. After the complete addition of NaOH, the reaction mixture was transferred to a commercial microwave oven and subjected to microwave irradiation for 2 min, with a 30 s step and a 1 min cooling period. The microwave energy promoted the rapid nucleation and crystallization of CuFe2O4, leading to the formation of nanosized particles with improved homogeneity. Following microwave treatment, the obtained precipitate was washed multiple times with distilled water to remove unreacted residues. Magnetic separation was employed to isolate the CuFe2O4 nanoparticles efficiently. The final product was then filtered and dried at 200 °C for 2 h, ensuring the removal of residual moisture and improving the structural integrity of the nanoparticles.

3. Characterizations

The structural properties of the synthesized CuFe2O4 nanoparticles were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. XRD patterns were recorded using a Bruker D8 diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 1.5406 Å) operating in the 2θ range of 5–80°. The surface morphology and microstructural features of the as-prepared CuFe2O4 nanoparticles were examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with a ZEISS GeminiSEM 360, Oberkochen, Germany operating in NanoVP mode. The electrochemical properties were evaluated using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) with a single-electrode setup on a CHI660E electrochemical workstation in 6 M KOH electrolyte. A three-electrode system was employed, where the working electrode was prepared by dispersing the synthesized material in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) via ultrasonication to obtain a homogeneous viscous paste. A known amount of this paste (2 mg) was then cast onto a piece of nickel foam (NF) measuring 1 cm × 1 cm and dried overnight at 80 °C. In the three-electrode configuration, a Hg/HgO electrode served as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was used as the counter electrode. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were carried out at various scan rates of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mV s−1 within a potential window of 0 to 0.5 V.

4. Results and Discussions

The synthesized CuFe2O4 nanoparticles were characterized using XRD to confirm their crystallographic phase composition. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared via the co-precipitation method using three different precipitating/reducing agents: (a) NaF, (b) Na2CO3, and (c) NaOH. The samples prepared with NaOH and Na2CO3 exhibited sharp and well-defined diffraction peaks corresponding to a single-phase formation of CuFe2O4. These peaks matched well with the standard diffraction data of copper ferrite, as per the JCPDS card No. 22–1086, confirming the formation of a pure spinel phase of CuFe2O4. This indicates that NaOH and Na2CO3 are effective in promoting the formation of a pure, single-phase CuFe2O4 structure during the co-precipitation process. In contrast, the sample synthesized using NaF displayed additional peaks in the XRD pattern, indicating the presence of secondary impurity phases along with the main CuFe2O4 phase. These secondary phases may arise due to an incomplete reaction or the formation of fluorinated byproducts, which suggests that NaF is less suitable as a precipitating agent for achieving phase-pure CuFe2O4 under the current synthesis conditions. Overall, the choice of precipitating/reducing agent plays a critical role in determining the phase purity and crystallinity of the final CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, with NaOH and Na2CO3 yielding the most favorable results for the formation of phase-pure copper ferrite.
To investigate the surface morphology and particle shape of the synthesized CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, FESEM analysis was performed. Figure 2 shows the FESEM micrographs of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared via the co-precipitation method using three different precipitating agents (a) NaF, (b) Na2CO3, and (c) NaOH. The CuFe2O4 sample synthesized using NaF exhibited a disordered and highly agglomerated network-like morphology. The structure appeared gel-like, composed of irregularly shaped particles including plate-like, petal-shaped, and rod-like features. This heterogeneous and poorly defined morphology suggests incomplete phase formation and significant structural disorder. These morphological observations are in good agreement with the XRD results, which showed the presence of secondary impurity phases, indicating that NaF is not ideal for achieving phase-pure CuFe2O4 under the current synthesis conditions. In contrast, the CuFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized with Na2CO3 showed a more uniform morphology, consisting predominantly of spherical particle clusters. These spherical aggregates were composed of smaller primary nanoparticles, and a few irregularly shaped particles were also observed within the cluster. The average size of these clusters was estimated to be around 100 nm. This microstructure is consistent with the XRD findings, which confirmed the formation of a single-phase CuFe2O4 spinel structure. The relatively uniform morphology suggests that Na2CO3 facilitates controlled nucleation and growth during co-precipitation, leading to improved particle uniformity. The sample prepared using NaOH exhibited the most well-defined and distinct nanoparticle morphology among the three. The FESEM images reveal dispersed individual nanoparticles with a range of shapes, including spherical, partially cubic, plate-like, and some irregular forms. Most of these particles were within the size range of a few tens of nanometers. Despite some shape diversity, the particles were relatively uniform and well separated, indicating a good degree of crystallinity and size control. These morphological characteristics align with the XRD results, which confirmed the formation of a pure CuFe2O4 phase with high crystallinity when NaOH was used as the precipitating agent.
To further evaluate the effect of the synthesis route on the structural characteristics of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, microwave-assisted synthesis was employed using NaOH as the precipitating agent, and the results were compared with those obtained from the conventional co-precipitation method. Figure 3 shows the comparative XRD patterns of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared via (a) the co-precipitation method and (b) the microwave-assisted chemical synthesis method. The XRD pattern of the CuFe2O4 synthesized via the microwave-assisted route exhibited sharp and well-defined peaks, indicating good crystallinity and the successful formation of a single-phase spinel structure. The absence of additional or unidentified peaks confirmed the phase purity, similar to that observed in the sample prepared through the co-precipitation method.
To estimate the crystallite size of the CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, the Scherrer equation was applied to the (311) peaks after Lorentzian peak fitting, carried out using Origin 8.5 software. Figure 4 shows the Lorentzian peak fitting of the XRD patterns for CuFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized via (a) the co-precipitation method and (b) microwave-assisted chemical synthesis, which was used to estimate the crystallite size using the Scherrer equation. The average grain size was calculated to be approximately 28 nm for the co-precipitated CuFe2O4 and 30 nm for the microwave-assisted synthesized sample. The slightly larger crystallite size in the microwave-assisted sample suggests accelerated crystal growth under microwave irradiation, likely due to rapid and uniform volumetric heating, which promotes enhanced nucleation kinetics and crystal development. Despite this minor difference, both methods yielded highly crystalline and phase-pure CuFe2O4 nanoparticles. The comparison indicates that microwave-assisted synthesis is an effective alternative to the traditional co-precipitation approach, offering advantages such as shorter reaction times, better energy efficiency, and comparable or slightly improved crystallite size and structural purity. These results suggest that microwave-assisted synthesis can be considered a viable and scalable method for producing high-quality CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, especially in applications where fast synthesis and uniform nanostructure are essential.
Figure 5 presents the (a) FESEM micrograph and (b) particle size distribution curve of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized via microwave-assisted chemical synthesis, along with (c) the particle size distribution curve for CuFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared through the co-precipitation method. The FESEM image of the microwave-synthesized CuFe2O4 clearly reveals that the majority of the particles exhibit a spherical morphology with relatively uniform size and limited agglomeration. This suggests that the microwave-assisted method promotes a rapid and homogeneous nucleation environment, resulting in the formation of more isotropic particles. The particle size distribution analysis further supports this observation. The average particle size of the CuFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized via the microwave-assisted method was estimated to be around 28 nm, with a relatively narrow size distribution ranging from 10 to 50 nm. In contrast, the CuFe2O4 nanoparticles obtained via the co-precipitation method exhibited a broader size distribution, ranging from 12 to 88 nm, with a higher average particle size of approximately 38 nm. This shift in particle size distribution indicates that the microwave-assisted synthesis method offers better control over particle size and uniformity compared to the conventional co-precipitation process. The narrower distribution and smaller average size observed in the microwave route are likely due to the fast, volumetric heating provided by microwave radiation, which reduces the time available for particle growth and aggregation.
These morphological findings correlate well with the XRD and Lorentzian peak fitting results, which showed a slightly smaller crystallite size for the microwave-assisted sample compared to the co-precipitated one. Although the crystallite sizes (from XRD) and particle sizes (from FESEM) differ due to their respective measurement principles, the trends are consistent: microwave synthesis results in smaller and more uniform particles, both at the grain and agglomerate levels. Overall, the combination of FESEM imaging and particle size distribution analysis highlights the advantages of microwave-assisted synthesis in achieving well-defined, uniform CuFe2O4 nanoparticles with reduced agglomeration and narrower size distribution—critical parameters for applications in catalysis, magnetic devices, and energy storage.
Further, the developed CuFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles were evaluated for their suitability in electrochemical supercapacitor application. The CuFe2O4 electrode’s CV curves, measured at different scan rates of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mV/s in a typical three-electrode configuration, are shown in Figure 6. The presence of faradaic reactions linked to the Cu2+/Cu3+ and Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couples is suggested by the presence of small but broad humps that correspond to redox transitions, even though distinct and well-defined redox peaks are not sharply identified. These redox characteristics confirm the CuFeO4 electrode material’s pseudocapacitive behavior.
The enclosed area under the CV curves expands larger as the scan rate increases, suggesting effective ion transport at the electrode–electrolyte interface and improved charge storage capacity. Materials displaying pseudocapacitive properties typically behave in this way. Furthermore, there is no distortion in the CV curves’ shape at any scan rate. Under dynamic cycling conditions, this stability suggests that the electrode material has good electrochemical reversibility and structural integrity. These findings demonstrate the encouraging electrochemical behavior of CuFeO4 with regard to stability, redox activity, and rate handling.
To evaluate the electrochemical performance of the synthesized CuFe2O4 electrode material, GCD measurements were conducted within a potential window of 0.0 to 0.45 V at various applied current densities (2 A/g, 3 A/g, 4 A/g, 5 A/g, and 10 A/g). The corresponding GCD profiles are shown in Figure 7a. The GCD curves demonstrate quasi-triangular shapes, which are characteristic of pseudocapacitive behavior. While the ideal linear symmetry typically seen in EDLCs is not perfectly preserved, the discharge segments exhibit a notable initial IR drop between 0.45 V and ~0.38 V, especially at lower current densities. This drop is attributed to the internal resistance of the electrode and interface contact resistance. Following this initial voltage drop, the discharge curves proceed in a more linear manner, which is indicative of the faradaic charge storage associated with the redox-active nature of CuFe2O4. The specific capacitance (Cₛ) of the CuFe2O4 electrode was calculated from the discharge portion of the GCD curves using the following formula:
Cs = (I × Δt)/(m × ΔV),
where I is the discharge current (A), Δt is the discharge time (s), m is the mass of the active material (g), and ΔV is the potential window (V). Based on this calculation, the specific capacitance values at different current densities were found to be 1000.1 F/g at 2 A/g, 969.3 F/g at 3 A/g, 905.7 F/g at 4 A/g, 863.3 F/g at 5 A/g, and 535.5 F/g at 10 A/g. These results indicate that the electrode exhibits excellent capacitive behavior, particularly at lower current densities. Although a gradual decline in capacitance is observed with increasing current density, the retention of relatively high capacitance even at 10 A/g suggests good rate capability. This trend is typical for pseudocapacitive materials and is attributed to limited ion diffusion and less efficient redox reactions at higher charge/discharge rates. Figure 7b illustrates the relationship between specific capacitance and current density, showing a consistent trend that supports the electrode’s robustness under various operating conditions.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a sustainable and resource-efficient strategy was developed for synthesizing CuFe2O4 nanoparticles by directly utilizing copper-rich mineral materials sourced from Chilean mining operations. Copper sulfate (CuSO4) was successfully obtained through the acid leaching of mined copper oxide minerals, and this leachate was subsequently used—after pH adjustment and concentration calibration—for the synthesis of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles via co-precipitation and microwave-assisted methods. The combination of FeSO4 and ferric ions was employed to ensure a proper Cu2+:Fe3+/Fe2+ stoichiometry conducive to forming a stable spinel structure. Among the various precipitating agents tested, NaOH and Na2CO3 enabled the formation of highly crystalline, phase-pure CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, as evidenced by XRD analysis. In contrast, NaF resulted in secondary phases and disordered morphologies, indicating its unsuitability under the current synthesis conditions. FESEM observations confirmed that NaOH yielded better-defined morphologies and smaller particle sizes with reduced agglomeration, particularly when used in the microwave-assisted method. The microwave-assisted synthesis approach demonstrated several advantages over conventional co-precipitation, including rapid reaction kinetics, narrower particle size distribution (10–50 nm), and enhanced homogeneity. The crystallite sizes estimated using the Scherrer equation (28–30 nm) were consistent with SEM-based particle size trends. Electrochemical characterization, including CV, and GCD confirmed the pseudocapacitive behavior of the CuFe2O4 electrodes. The electrode exhibited a high specific capacitance of 1000.1 F/g at 2 A/g, with good rate capability, reinforcing its suitability for supercapacitor applications. Overall, this work highlights the feasibility of converting mined mineral resources into functional magnetic nanomaterials, contributing to sustainable resource utilization and circular economy principles. The developed methodology provides a scalable route not only for synthesizing CuFe2O4 but also for extending this approach to the valorization of other mineral-based sources including tailings toward high-value applications such as energy storage and environmental remediation. Future work will focus on optimizing synthesis parameters such as pH, temperature, and stirring rate to enhance phase purity and particle uniformity. Improved purification steps will be explored to obtain high-purity metal ions from leachates. Additionally, the method will be extended to other metals like Co and Ni, and the catalytic and magnetic properties of the synthesized CuFe2O4 will be evaluated. Scale-up and economic feasibility studies will also be undertaken.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min15080819/s1, Figure S1. Minerals with sulfuric acid during the leaching process; Figure S2. Samples subjected to orbital shaking at 150 rpm for 30 min; Figure S3. Filtration process of samples after 30 min of leaching.

Author Contributions

C.V.A.: methodology, investigation, writing—original draft. M.J.M.: resources, writing—review and editing. G.S.-H.: resources, writing—review and editing. T.K.: investigation, resources, writing—review and editing. N.C.: resources, writing—review and editing. S.K.K.: software, resources, writing—review and editing. N.D.: resources, writing—review and editing. A.T.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID) through the project SA 77210070.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The author A.T. acknowledge Universidad de Atacama for their support and Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID) for the project SA 77210070. The authors C.V. and A.T. acknowledge the support of the project DIUDA 2024, code 88231R10, titled “Valorización de Residuos Mineros (relaves) mediante la obtención de Ferrita de Cobre hacia un Desarrollo Sostenible de la Región de Atacama”. The author acknowledges Durgaprasad Pabba for his kind support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Backman, C.-M. Global Supply and Demand of Metals in the Future. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2008, 71, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Elshkaki, A.; Graedel, T.E.; Ciacci, L.; Reck, B.K. Copper demand, supply, and associated energy use to 2050. Glob. Environ. Change 2016, 39, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thirumurugan, A.; Govindaraj, R.; Dhanabalan, S.; Sakthivel, P.; Chidhambaram, N.; Udayabhaskar, R.; Kamaraj, S.K.; Abarzúa, C.V.; Nazer, J.C.; Morel, M.J. Strategic analysis of lithium resources by addressing challenges and opportunities for sustainable electric vehicle battery development in the era of global EV domination. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 2025, 239, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lagos, G.; Peters, D.; Lima, M.; Jara, J.J. Potential copper production through 2035 in Chile. Miner. Econ. 2020, 33, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barros, K.S.; Vielmo, V.S.; Moreno, B.G.; Riveros, G.; Cifuentes, G.; Bernardes, A.M. Chemical Composition Data of the Main Stages of Copper Production from Sulfide Minerals in Chile: A Review to Assist Circular Economy Studies. Minerals 2022, 12, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Texeira, L.; Calisaya-Azpilcueta, D.; Cruz, C.; Botero, Y.L.; Cisternas, L.A. Impact of the use of seawater on acid mine drainage from mining wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 383, 135516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adamovic, D.; Ishiyama, D.; Dordievski, S.; Ogawa, Y.; Stevanovic, Z.; Kawaraya, H.; Sato, H.; Obradovic, L.; Marinkovic, V.; Petrovic, J.; et al. Estimation and comparison of the environmental impacts of acid mine drainage-bearing river water in the Bor and Majdanpek porphyry copper mining areas in Eastern Serbia. Resour. Geol. 2021, 71, 123–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Punia, A. Role of temperature, wind, and precipitation in heavy metal contamination at copper mines: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 4056–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leiva González, J.; Onederra, I. Environmental Management Strategies in the Copper Mining Industry in Chile to Address Water and Energy Challenges—Review. Mining 2022, 2, 197–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Drewniak, L.; Jiang, C.; Li, Q.; Li, W.; et al. Life cycle assessment and cost analysis for copper hydrometallurgy industry in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 309, 114689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seyrankaya, A. Pressure Leaching of Copper Slag Flotation Tailings in Oxygenated Sulfuric Acid Media. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 35562–35574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hosseinzadeh, M.; Entezari Zarandi, A.; Pasquier, L.-C.; Azizi, A. Kinetic Investigation on Leaching of Copper from a Low-Grade Copper Oxide Deposit in Sulfuric Acid Solution: A Case Study of the Crushing Circuit Reject of a Copper Heap Leaching Plant. J. Sustain. Metall. 2021, 7, 1154–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mohanraj, G.T.; Rahman, M.R.; Arya, S.B.; Barman, R.; Krishnendu, P.; Singh Meena, S. Characterization study and recovery of copper from low grade copper ore through hydrometallurgical route. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022, 33, 103382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calgaro, C.O.; Da Silva, M.D.C.R.; Tanabe, E.H.; Bertuol, D.A. Copper Electrowinning from Supercritical Leachate of Printed Circuit Boards. Metals 2023, 13, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fathima, A.; Tang, J.Y.B.; Giannis, A.; Ilankoon, I.M.S.K.; Chong, M.N. Catalysing electrowinning of copper from E-waste: A critical review. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pizarro Barraza, F.; Thiyagarajan, D.; Ramadoss, A.; Manikandan, V.S.; Dhanabalan, S.S.; Abarzúa, C.V.; Sotomayor Soloaga, P.; Campos Nazer, J.; Morel, M.J.; Thirumurugan, A. Unlocking the potential: Mining tailings as a source of sustainable nanomaterials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 202, 114665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Machiels, L.; Arnout, L.; Yan, P.; Jones, P.T.; Blanpain, B.; Pontikes, Y. Transforming Enhanced Landfill Mining Derived Gasification/Vitrification Glass into Low-Carbon Inorganic Polymer Binders and Building Products. J. Sustain. Metall. 2017, 3, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krook, J.; Svensson, N.; Eklund, M. Landfill mining: A critical review of two decades of research. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Álvarez, M.L.; Méndez, A.; Rodríguez-Pacheco, R.; Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Gascó, G. Recovery of Zinc and Copper from Mine Tailings by Acid Leaching Solutions Combined with Carbon-Based Materials. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nishida, N.; Amagasa, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamada, Y. One-pot production of copper ferrite nanoparticles using a chemical method. Hyperfine Interact. 2016, 237, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zaharieva, K.; Rives, V.; Tsvetkov, M.; Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.; Kunev, B.; Trujillano, R.; Mitov, I.; Milanova, M. Preparation, characterization and application of nanosized copper ferrite photocatalysts for dye degradation under UV irradiation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 160, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El-Masry, M.M.; El-Shahat, M.; Ramadan, R.; Abdelhameed, R.M. Selective photocatalytic reduction of nitroarenes into amines based on cobalt/copper ferrite and cobalt-doped copper ferrite nano-photocatalyst. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 18408–18424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Udhaya, P.A.; Ahmad, A.; Meena, M.; Queen, M.A.J.; Aravind, M.; Velusamy, P.; Almutairi, T.M.; Mohammed, A.A.A.; Ali, S. Copper Ferrite nanoparticles synthesised using a novel green synthesis route: Structural development and photocatalytic activity. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1277, 134807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. George, J.; Abraham, K.E. The structural phase change of copper ferrite and its gas-sensing properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 13220–13238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mahapatra, P.L.; Das, S.; Keasberry, N.A.; Ibrahim, S.B.; Saha, D. Copper ferrite inverse spinel-based highly sensitive and selective chemiresistive gas sensor for the detection of formalin adulteration in fish. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 960, 170792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Priyadharsini, R.; Manoharan, C.; Bououdina, M.; Sagadevan, S.; Venkateshwarlu, M.; Asath Bahadur, S. Impact of nickel substitution on structural, dielectric, magnetic, and electrochemical properties of copper ferrite nanostructures for energy storage devices. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 653, 917–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ortiz-Quiñonez, J.-L.; Das, S.; Pal, U. Catalytic and pseudocapacitive energy storage performance of metal (Co, Ni, Cu and Mn) ferrite nanostructures and nanocomposites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 130, 100995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mandal, S.; Dasmahapatra, A.K. Hierarchical polyaniline/copper cobalt ferrite nanocomposites for high performance supercapacitor electrode. J. Energy Storage 2023, 74, 109402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Masunga, N.; Mamba, B.B.; Getahun, Y.W.; El-Gendy, A.A.; Kefeni, K.K. Synthesis of single-phase superparamagnetic copper ferrite nanoparticles using an optimized coprecipitation method. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 272, 115368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subha, A.; Shalini, M.G.; Sahu, B.N.; Rout, S.; Sahoo, S.C. Role of surface defects and anisotropy variation on magnetic properties of copper ferrite nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 286, 126212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arshad, M.I.; Hasan, M.S.; Rehman, A.U.; Akhtar, M.; Tung, L.D.; Amin, N.; Mahmood, K.; Ali, A.; Trakoolwilaiwan, T.; Thanh, N.T.K. Structural, optical, electrical, dielectric, molecular vibrational and magnetic properties of La3+ doped Mg–Cd–Cu ferrites prepared by Co-precipitation technique. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 14246–14260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, A.; Gangawane, K.M. Effect of precipitating agents on the magnetic and structural properties of the synthesized ferrimagnetic nanoparticles by co-precipitation method. Powder Technol. 2022, 401, 117298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kushwaha, P.; Chauhan, P. Influence of different surfactants on morphological, structural, optical, and magnetic properties of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles synthesized via co-precipitation method. Appl. Phys. A 2022, 128, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yi, X.; Peng, Y.; Yao, Z.; Xia, C.; Zhu, S. Microstructure and magnetic properties of FeSiAl soft magnetic composites prepared by chemical in-situ coprecipitation with NaOH. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 267, 124626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xia, A.; Jin, C.; Du, D.; Zhu, G. Comparative study of structural and magnetic properties of NiZnCu ferrite powders prepared via chemical coprecipitation method with different coprecipitators. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323, 1682–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, L.; Zhang, N.; Sun, K.; Yang, T. High rate performance of Li[Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3]O2 synthesized via co-precipitation method by different precipitators. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2009, 70, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ermakova, Y.A.; Pominova, D.V.; Voronov, V.V.; Yapryntsev, A.D.; Ivanov, V.K.; Tabachkova, N.Y.; Fedorov, P.P.; Kuznetsov, S.V. Synthesis of SrF2:Yb:Er ceramic precursor powder by co-precipitation from aqueous solution with different fluorinating media: NaF, KF and NH4F. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 5448–5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Han, G.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y. Facile microwave-assisted synthesis of magnetic ferrite: Rapid interfacial reaction underlying intensifying mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 361, 132181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mayakkannan, M.; Siva, V.; Murugan, A.; Shameem, A.; Thangarasu, S.; Asath Bahadur, S. Microwave-assisted synthesis of ternary transition metal ferrite: Structural, morphological, optical, magnetic and electrochemical properties. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2023, 147, 115573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ansari, M.R.; Kem, A.; Agrohi, P.; Mallick, P.K.; Rao, P.; Peta, K.R. Structural, optical, magnetic and anti-bacterial properties of green synthesized spinel zinc ferrite by microwave-assisted method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 301, 127641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD spectra of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared through co-precipitation method with (a) NaF, (b) Na2CO3, and (c) NaOH (*—impurities).
Figure 1. XRD spectra of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared through co-precipitation method with (a) NaF, (b) Na2CO3, and (c) NaOH (*—impurities).
Minerals 15 00819 g001
Figure 2. FESEM micrograph of CuFe2O4 nanoparticle prepared through co-precipitation method with (a) NaF, (b) Na2CO3, and (c) NaOH.
Figure 2. FESEM micrograph of CuFe2O4 nanoparticle prepared through co-precipitation method with (a) NaF, (b) Na2CO3, and (c) NaOH.
Minerals 15 00819 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of CuFe2O4 prepared through (a) co-precipitation method and (b) microwave-assisted chemical synthesis.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of CuFe2O4 prepared through (a) co-precipitation method and (b) microwave-assisted chemical synthesis.
Minerals 15 00819 g003
Figure 4. Lorentz peak fitting of prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticle via (a) co-precipitation method and (b) microwave-assisted chemical synthesis.
Figure 4. Lorentz peak fitting of prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticle via (a) co-precipitation method and (b) microwave-assisted chemical synthesis.
Minerals 15 00819 g004
Figure 5. (a) FESEM micrograph and (b) particle size distribution curve of CuFe2O4 prepared through microwave-assisted chemical synthesis, and (c) particle size distribution curve of CuFe2O4 prepared through co-precipitation method.
Figure 5. (a) FESEM micrograph and (b) particle size distribution curve of CuFe2O4 prepared through microwave-assisted chemical synthesis, and (c) particle size distribution curve of CuFe2O4 prepared through co-precipitation method.
Minerals 15 00819 g005
Figure 6. CV curves of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles at various scan rates.
Figure 6. CV curves of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles at various scan rates.
Minerals 15 00819 g006
Figure 7. (a) GCD curves of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles at various current densities and (b) specific capacitance vs. current density plot.
Figure 7. (a) GCD curves of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles at various current densities and (b) specific capacitance vs. current density plot.
Minerals 15 00819 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abarzúa, C.V.; Morel, M.J.; Sandoval-Hevia, G.; Kavinkumar, T.; Chidhambaram, N.; Kamaraj, S.K.; Dineshbabu, N.; Thirumurugan, A. Mineral-Based Synthesis of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles via Co-Precipitation and Microwave Techniques Using Leached Copper Solutions from Mined Minerals. Minerals 2025, 15, 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080819

AMA Style

Abarzúa CV, Morel MJ, Sandoval-Hevia G, Kavinkumar T, Chidhambaram N, Kamaraj SK, Dineshbabu N, Thirumurugan A. Mineral-Based Synthesis of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles via Co-Precipitation and Microwave Techniques Using Leached Copper Solutions from Mined Minerals. Minerals. 2025; 15(8):819. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abarzúa, Carolina Venegas, Mauricio J. Morel, Gabriela Sandoval-Hevia, Thangavel Kavinkumar, Natarajan Chidhambaram, Sathish Kumar Kamaraj, Nagarajan Dineshbabu, and Arun Thirumurugan. 2025. "Mineral-Based Synthesis of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles via Co-Precipitation and Microwave Techniques Using Leached Copper Solutions from Mined Minerals" Minerals 15, no. 8: 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080819

APA Style

Abarzúa, C. V., Morel, M. J., Sandoval-Hevia, G., Kavinkumar, T., Chidhambaram, N., Kamaraj, S. K., Dineshbabu, N., & Thirumurugan, A. (2025). Mineral-Based Synthesis of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles via Co-Precipitation and Microwave Techniques Using Leached Copper Solutions from Mined Minerals. Minerals, 15(8), 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop