Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Na-X Zeolite Using a Natural Opaline Diatomite Rock from SE Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Strength Prediction for Cemented Paste Backfills with Various Fly Ash Substitution: Computational Approach with Machine Learning Algorithms
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Experimental Study of Dolostone Recrystallization Under Fluid Overpressure and Its Implication for Reservoir Property Improvement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Evolution and Main Controlling Factors of Inner-Platform Carbonate Reservoirs in Restricted–Evaporative Environment: A Case Study of O2m56 in the Ordos Basin, North China

1
Sichuan Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Geology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
2
Division of Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs, China National Petroleum Corporation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
3
Geological Exploration and Development Research Institute of CCDC, CNPC, Chengdu 610051, China
4
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China
5
Department of Natural Gas Evaluation Project, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China
6
The Fourth Gas Production Plant, Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Ordos 017300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(3), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030236
Submission received: 19 January 2025 / Revised: 19 February 2025 / Accepted: 24 February 2025 / Published: 26 February 2025

Abstract

:
The potential for oil and gas exploration within inter-salt reservoirs is substantial, primarily due to their significant heterogeneity, which complicates accurate predictions. This study focuses on the inter-salt reservoirs of the sixth sub-member of the fifth member of the Majiagou Formation (hereafter referred to as O2m56) in the Ordos Basin, North China. Utilizing core samples, thin sections, and petrophysical data, we investigated the differential evolution and primary controlling factors of the inter-salt carbonate reservoirs. The key findings are as follows: (1) During the sedimentary phase of O2m56, high-energy sediments, such as shoals and microbial mounds, were deposited in highlands, while low-energy sediments, including dolomitic lagoons and gypsiferous lagoons, emerged in depressions from west to east. (2) In a restricted–evaporative environment, highlands are prone to karstification, which significantly enhances the development of inter-salt reservoirs and generates a variety of reservoir spaces, including interparticle dissolved pores, growth-framework dissolved pores, and micropores between vadose silts. (3) The presence of alternating highlands and depressions obstructs seawater flow, leading to a progressive increase in salinity from west to east. This process ultimately facilitates the infilling of reservoir spaces with calcite, anhydrite, and halite cements in the same direction. (4) The three components—reservoir rocks, karstification, and infilling features—exert varying effects in the region and collectively govern the north–south distribution of inter-salt reservoirs. Overall, this study examines the characteristics and controlling factors of carbonate reservoirs within a restricted–evaporative platform environment and provides pertinent research cases for the exploration of inter-salt reservoirs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The carbonate–evaporite symbiotic systems have been extensively distributed throughout geological history [1] and are known to contain significant oil and gas resources [2]. Previous research has categorized carbonate reservoirs into two main types: pre-salt reservoirs and inter-salt reservoirs, based on the distribution of carbonate and evaporite formations. Pre-salt reservoirs exhibit favorable geological conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and are associated with numerous significant oil and gas fields worldwide, including the Cretaceous system of the Santos Basin in Brazil [3,4], the Jurassic Ghawar oil and gas field in Saudi Arabia [5], and the Carboniferous–Permian Karachaganak oil field in Kazakhstan [6]. In contrast, inter-salt reservoirs, while possessing similar reservoir formation conditions, have received comparatively less scholarly attention than pre-salt reservoirs [7,8]. Exploration activities have revealed that inter-salt reservoirs possess unique characteristics regarding development patterns, lateral scale, and preservation [9,10]. Firstly, inter-salt reservoirs are interbedded with evaporite due to environmental conditions such as restricted sedimentary seawater and high-frequency sea-level fluctuations [11,12,13]. This results in relatively limited thickness and lateral extension of individual reservoir sets within carbonate rocks [14,15]. Secondly, due to the high solubility and precipitation of evaporite minerals [1], when heavy brine migrates back into the underlying carbonate rocks, the precipitated evaporite minerals will infill and deplete pore spaces [7,16]. Finally, the reservoir spaces infilled with evaporite minerals undergo repeated closure and opening during burial stage, which not only complicates the formation of reservoirs but also influences the migration of hydrocarbon substances [7]. In summary, the presence of evaporite minerals contributes to the heterogeneity of inter-salt reservoirs, thereby complicating the prediction of favorable inter-salt reservoirs. Therefore, there is a pressing need for increased research efforts focused on inter-salt reservoirs.
The Ordovician Majiagou Formation in the Ordos Basin exhibits multiple sets of carbonate–evaporite symbiotic systems, with the largest one occurring in the sixth sub-member of the fifth member, hereafter referred to as O2m56 [17]. Extensive drilling core and well logging data indicate that O2m56 encompasses inter-salt reservoirs characterized by favorable physical properties, thereby establishing it as a principal pay zone in the Majiagou Formation [15,16,17]. As a result, O2m56 is considered an optimal subject for investigating the mechanisms of reservoir formation and the distribution of inter-salt reservoirs in carbonate–evaporite symbiotic systems. Previous studies on this reservoir have predominantly concentrated on regions adjacent to erosion lines, positing that reservoir formation is primarily associated with karstification rather than evaporites. Recently, as exploration efforts have shifted towards the central and eastern parts of the Ordos Basin, it has been discovered that numerous thin reservoirs have developed between evaporites, revealing a more intricate distribution of the O2m56 reservoirs [18]. A significant challenge in this context is that high-quality carbonate reservoirs linked to evaporites are frequently infilled with evaporite minerals, leading to ambiguities regarding the formation, preservation, and heterogeneity of inter-salt reservoirs, which seriously restrict the exploration of O2m56. Therefore, further research in this domain is warranted.
This paper aims to review the types of reservoir rocks, the characteristics of reservoir spaces, the development environments, and the physical properties of reservoirs across various geomorphic units, utilizing extensive drilling core and thin section data from O2m56. Building upon this foundation, the study seeks to elucidate the differential formation mechanisms of carbonate reservoirs within the restricted–evaporative platform by comprehensively considering the influence of geological factors, such as paleogeomorphology, sea-level fluctuations, and seawater differentiation, on inter-salt reservoirs.

2. Geologic Setting

The Ordos Basin is located on the western edge of the North China Platform (Figure 1a), with an area of about 33.7 × 105 km2. The basin has evolved in multiple tectonic cycles [19]. During the Caledonian cycle, the Paleo-Asian Ocean and the Central Qilian Massif experienced subduction and subsequent collision with the North China Plate [20]. This geological activity led to the formation of various tectonic units, including the Yimeng paleo-uplift, Qingyang paleo-uplift, and the Lvliang underwater low-uplift surrounding the basin. The study area is located in the central–eastern depression confined by these three uplifts (Figure 1a). In the Ordovician period, the Majiagou Formation developed a sedimentary system characterized by rhythmically interbedded carbonate and evaporite layers, a result of the isolation of seawater in the basin due to the surrounding paleo-uplifts [17] (Figure 1b). This formation has experienced sedimentation through three marine transgression–regression cycles, identified as O1m1, O1m3, and O2m5 within the highstand system tract (HST), and O1m2, O2m4, and O2m6 within the transgression system tract (TST) [21,22]. In the context of high-frequency sea-level fluctuations, the O2m57-10 developed a multi-layered dolomite–anhydrite symbiotic system [23], while the overlying O2m56 represents the most extensive evaporite system within the Majiagou Formation.
During the sedimentary period of O2m56, the east–west trending compressive stress shaped a south–north trending concave–convex landform pattern within the study area. From west to east, the geological features include the Taolimiao west depression, Taolimiao highland, Taolimiao east depression, Hengshan highland, and East salty depression (Figure 1c,d) [17]. Over time, the water in these areas became increasingly saline, leading to the sequential development of various sedimentary environments, including dolomitic restricted lagoons, dolomitic–gypsiferous evaporative lagoons, gypsiferous evaporative lagoons, and salty evaporative lagoons [17]. In terms of rock types, micritic dolomite and thinly layered anhydrite are developed in the Taolimiao west depression and the Taolimiao underwater low highland. In contrast, rhythmically interbedded sediments of dolomite and anhydrite dominate the Taolimiao east depression and Hengshan highland, while substantial halite deposits are locally observed on the western side of Hengshan highland. Furthermore, very thick halite layers are present in the East salty depression, often interbedded with thin layers of dolomite and mudstone (Figure 2). The frequency of development of carbonate reservoirs in the study area exhibits a decreasing trend from west to east (Figure 2).

3. Samples and Methodology

The geomorphological analysis conducted during the sedimentary period of during the sedimentary period of O2m56 in the Ordos Basin [17] has led to the classification of the study area into five distinct development zones of carbonate reservoirs: Zone A (Taolimiao west depression), Zone B (Taolimiao highland), Zone C (Taolimiao east depression), Zone D (western edge of Hengshan highland), and Zone E (eastern edge of Hengshan highland), as illustrated in Figure 1c,d. This classification facilitated a comprehensive examination of the sedimentary environment, reservoir rock types, and reservoir spaces within the study area, allowing for a comparative analysis of the reservoir properties and characteristics across the five zones.
The cores, 500 m in total, from 12 wells in the study area were observed and interpreted in detail to identify rock types, reservoir rock/space types, and sedimentary structures. Specific coring intervals from five representative wells (one from each of the five zones) were selected based on the chronostratigraphic framework (Figure 2) to ensure lateral comparability. Lithological sequences, texture profiles, karst features, and reservoir properties were documented for these intervals. Thin sections were prepared from 200 core samples, which were subsequently impregnated with blue epoxy resin to enhance pore visibility and stained with Alizarin red S to distinguish between calcite and dolomite. Finally, the Leica DM2500P polarizing microscope was used to describe and photograph the microscopic features of these thin sections. Moreover, 440 sidewall coring samples underwent testing for effective porosity and absolute permeability at the Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, in accordance with the Porosity and Permeability Measurement of Core in Net Confining Stress (SY/T6385-2016) standards [26].

4. Results

4.1. Facies Sequences

(1)
Zone A
The facies sequence predominantly consists of carbonate rocks, characterized by a typical lithological association that includes micritic dolomite, laminar anhydrite-bearing dolomite, grain dolomite, and mosaic anhydrite. The interval from 3727.0 to 3720.1 m in the representative Well T105 comprises three distinct cycles (Figure 3①), with individual cycle thicknesses ranging from 1 to 2.5 m. Cycle S1 is characterized by a lithological association of layered stromatolite, massive micritic dolomite, and laminar anhydrite-bearing dolomite, arranged from the base to the top. Cycle S2 features micritic dolomite with biological burrows at the bottom, transitioning to dolarenite with small irregular cavities upwards, and culminating in mosaic anhydrite at the top. Cycle S3 exhibits micritic dolomite interbedded with grain dolomite, which is 0.8 m thick at the bottom, followed by thinly layered stromatolite with bedded channels above the micritic dolomite and concluding with mosaic anhydrite at the top. In Zone A, the thickness of an individual shoal is considerable, measuring up to 1.2 m. However, the presence of anhydrite and laminar stromatolite is comparatively infrequent.
(2)
Zone B
Zone B is characterized by well-developed carbonate rocks, in contrast to the less developed evaporites. The complete lithological sequence, arranged from the bottom to the top, consists of dolarenite/micritic dolomite, thrombolite, laminar stromatolite, and karst breccia. The interval between 3765.9 m and 3858.5 m in the representative Well T78 can be subdivided into four distinct sedimentary cycles, each exhibiting a thickness ranging from 1.3 m to 2 m, with exposed surfaces at the top of each cycle (Figure 3②). Cycle S1 is a descending half cycle, which includes three overlapping sets of reverse-graded grain dolomite, interspersed with thin layers of stromatolite and oolitic dolomite between the lower and upper shoals. Cycle S2 demonstrates a transition to micritic dolomite at the bottom, accompanied by local argillaceous stripes and an overlying layer of grain dolomite. Cycle S3 retains micritic dolomite at the bottom but transitions to microbial thrombolite and stromatolite in the middle to upper sections. Finally, Cycle S4 exhibits a facies sequence of argillaceous dolomite, micritic dolomite, and karst breccia, with the uppermost bedrock having been fragmented into breccia by karstic fluids. Compared with Zone A, Zone B displays a greater frequency and scale of development for both grain dolomite and microbial dolomite, as well as an increased intensity of karstification.
(3)
Zone C
Zone C is predominantly characterized by the presence of anhydrite. The interval between 3643.8 m and 3636.7 m in the representative Well JT1 can be subdivided into four similar complete sedimentary cycles (Figure 3③). Each cycle is manifested by a lithological association that includes micritic dolomite, thrombolite, and stromatolite in the lower section, transitioning to layered dolomitic anhydrite and mosaic anhydrite in the upper section, occasionally interspersed with thin layers of gypsiferous rudaceous dolomite. Zone C demonstrates a notably increased percentage of layered anhydrite in the facies sequence, whereas the formation of karst features in this area appears to be comparatively limited.
(4)
Zone D
The interval ranging from 3379.7 to 3371.0 m in the representative Well T112 comprises four distinct sedimentary cycles, which can be categorized into two types based on their lithological combinations (Figure 3④). The first type includes Cycle S1 and Cycle S4, characterized by a lithological sequence that features thick thrombolite at the base, followed by stromatolite, and culminating in layers of lamellar dolomitic anhydrite and mosaic anhydrite at the top. In contrast, the second type, represented by Cycle S2 and Cycle S3, is predominantly composed of anhydrites. These cycles typically display a progression from thinly layered micritic dolomite or dolomitic anhydrite to mosaic anhydrite, interspersed with dolarenite. The microbial dolomite in Zone D has a considerable thickness, with individual layers measuring approximately 2 m. Moreover, this zone contains karst features, including channels and karst breccia, within the microbial mounds, and the thickness of the karst development section surpasses that observed in Zone B. In addition, mosaic anhydrites are formed at the top of each cycle.
(5)
Zone E
Zone E is distinguished by the symbiotic relationship between microbial rocks and evaporites. The interval between 3544.4 m and 3539.7 m in the representative Well J5 comprises five sedimentary cycles that exhibit similar lithological characteristics, with individual cycle thicknesses ranging from 0.5 to 1 m (Figure 3⑤). Each sedimentary cycle is characterized by a lower section consisting of a few layers of micritic dolomite, a middle section composed of thrombolite or bonding dolarenite, and an upper section featuring mosaic anhydrite. Notably, Zone E displays a smaller thickness of individual cycles compared with other zones and is also marked by karst features, including halite moldic pores, small irregular cavities, and anhydrite breccia.

4.2. Types and Physical Properties of Reservoirs

4.2.1. Types and Characteristics of Reservoir Rocks

(1)
Grain dolomite
The grain dolomite in the study is primarily categorized into two types: dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite (Figure 4a–c, Figure 5a and Figure 6a,b) and oolitic dolomite (Figure 5b). The smooth surfaces of the cores are dark gray to yellow-brown, while the natural cross-sections display a rough texture. The dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite reveals two notable features under the microscope: (1) the grains are well structured and preserved (Figure 4e,f, Figure 5e and Figure 6e,f), with a fabric that is grain supported. The sand-sized carbonate particles constitute approximately 60%–75% of the composition, with a grain size ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 mm, and exhibit moderate sorting. Additionally, dolomite and calcite cements locally infill the interstitial spaces between grains; (2) the grain structure appears blurred as a result of recrystallization (Figure 4g, Figure 5f and Figure 6g). At the microscopic level, the oolitic dolomite exhibits well-preserved ooid circle structures, mainly consisting of normal ooids, which may be either suspension supported (Figure 5g) or grain supported (Figure 7g,h).
(2)
Microbial dolomite
Microbial dolomite includes three types: binding dolarenite (Figure 5c), thrombolite (Figure 5c and Figure 7b,c), and stromatolite (Figure 6c and Figure 7b). The binding dolarenite is formed by the binding and capture of sand-sized particles by the extracellular polymers of microorganisms [27]. It macroscopically appears gray-brown and develops anhydrite clumps and microscopically contains sand-sized particles mostly wrapped by microbial clumps (Figure 5h,i). The thrombolite macroscopically appears as brownish-gray speckles and microscopically contains dark growth-framework, cluster, and laminar textures and is infilled with multiple stages of cements (Figure 5j, Figure 6h and Figure 7e,f). The stromatolite displays a laminar texture with alternating bright and dark layers (Figure 6i). The dark layers are enriched in organic matter, with microbial fabric resulting from the calcification of microbial hyphae [27]. In contrast, the bright layers consist of brown-gray micritic-crystalline dolomite, with non-microbial fabric. The stromatolite in the study area mainly contains nearly horizontal and micro wavy laminae, with some areas exhibiting moundy laminae.
(3)
Crystalline dolomite
The core of crystalline dolomite shows yellow-brown and gray-brown patches and exhibits karst features such as small irregular cavities (Figure 7d and Figure 8a–c) or layered dissolution (Figure 4d). Microscopic examination reveals that dolomite primarily occurs in a fine- to medium-grained form, displaying a xenomorphic to hypidiomorphic mosaic texture, with some particle ghosts and well-developed intercrystalline (dissolved) pores. The crystal grains within the crystalline dolomite, which have been altered by karstification, are generally loose and generally dark in color (Figure 4h,i, Figure 5k, Figure 7k and Figure 8d–f).
(4)
Karst breccia
Karst breccia is observed to develop on a relatively small scale within the study area, primarily infilling karst channels (Figure 5d). Under the microscope, the breccias exhibit angular characteristics, with some displaying indistinct boundaries as a result of subsequent dissolution processes. The predominant composition of these breccias consists of crystalline dolomite, infilled with discrete carbonate silt, as well as saddle-shaped dolomite or calcite cements (Figure 5l, Figure 7l and Figure 8h,i).
By analyzing the typical reservoir rock types in the geomorphic units in the study area, it is found that the reservoir rocks are distributed differentially. Typically, the grain dolomite mainly occurs in the Taolimiao highland (Zone A and Zone B).

4.2.2. Types and Characteristics of Reservoir Spaces

(1)
Interparticle (dissolved) pores
This type of pore is predominantly observed in dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite and oolitic dolomite (Figure 4e,f and Figure 5e). The interparticle pores are primary pores formed by grain support, while residual interparticle pores develop subsequent to the infilling of cements between the grains. Interparticle dissolved pores arise from the expansion of interparticle pores due to the dissolution processes facilitated by diagenetic fluids. Some of these pores are often infilled with vadose silt (Figure 4f and Figure 5e), fine-grained dolomite (Figure 4e,f and Figure 5e), and anhydrite cements (Figure 6e,f and Figure 7g,h). This type of reservoir space has irregular shapes and varying pore sizes (0.1–2 mm).
(2)
Intraparticle dissolved pores and moldic pores
This type of reservoir space is mainly found in dolarenite, oolitic dolomite, and bonding dolarenite (Figure 4g, Figure 5g and Figure 8e). The pores are mostly rounded, with pore sizes ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 mm. Both pores develop less frequently in the study area, and they are formed by fabric-selective dissolution of carbonate particles by meteoric freshwater during the penecontemporaneous period [28]. These pores are often infilled with vadose silt (Figure 4g and Figure 5g), and they exhibit geopetal structures (Figure 8e). However, they are poorly interconnected and often remain isolated.
(3)
Growth-framework pores
They are primary pores formed by the construction of biological growth frameworks during the sedimentary period of microbial dolomite (Figure 5h–j and Figure 6h,i). This type of pore is often infilled with cements such as fine-grained dolomite, calcite, or anhydrite. The dissolved pores formed by the dissolution and expansion of diagenetic fluids display embayed dissolution characteristics at their edges. The sizes of these pores range from 0.1 to 0.3 mm (Figure 6i and Figure 7e). This type of pore is mainly distributed in various forms of microbial carbonate rocks in the study area, exhibiting a high development frequency. Furthermore, these pores can interconnect with other pore types, thereby forming network pore spaces that enhance connectivity.
(4)
Intercrystalline (dissolved) pores
This specific type of reservoir space is present within the crystalline dolomite (Figure 4h,i, Figure 5k, Figure 7k and Figure 8d). The process of karstification, which has occurred in multiple stages, has led to the dissolution and enlargement of intercrystalline pores, resulting in the formation of intercrystalline dissolved pores. In certain areas, vadose silt that partially infills these pores diminishes the quality of reservoirs.
(5)
Micropores between vadose silt in karst channels
This type of pore belongs to non-fabric-selective secondary pores, which are extensively present in the study area, particularly within dolarenite, microbial dolomite, and karst breccia dolomite. The reworking of reservoir rocks through multiple phases of karstification has resulted in early dissolved pores or karst breccia being infilled with vadose silt, which possesses relatively loose and porous characteristics. This process leads to the formation of micropores within the vadose silt (Figure 5l and Figure 7k,l). Additionally, the karst channels are infilled with calcite, anhydrite, and halite cements (Figure 5k,l, Figure 7i–l and Figure 8f–i).

4.2.3. Comparison of Reservoir Physical Properties in Zones A–E

The analysis of reservoir porosity and permeability statistics for geomorphic units in O2m56 (Figure 9), alongside the examination of reservoir petrological characteristics, indicates notable variations in reservoir properties across different zones.
In Zone A, the reservoir rocks are represented by grain dolomite, with a minor presence of crystalline dolomite. Specifically, the dolarenite reservoir exhibits the highest development frequency. The primary reservoir spaces consist of interparticle (dissolved) pores and intercrystalline dissolved pores, which are infilled with dolomite cements and vadose silt. Zone A is generally characterized by low porosity and by low-permeability reservoirs with moderate physical properties (Table 1). The porosity within this zone ranges from 0.45% to 12.56%, with an average of 3.76% ± 3.20%. Notably, a significant proportion of the total samples, specifically 38.82%, demonstrates porosity values below 2% (Figure 9a–c).
In Zone B, the predominant reservoir rocks are composed of grain dolomite, accompanied by some microbial dolomite. The reservoir spaces include interparticle (dissolved) pores and growth-framework (dissolved) pores. Compared with Zone A, the dolomite cements within the pores are comparatively lower in this zone. The porosity ranges from 0.03% to 11.99% with an average of 4.50% ± 2.85%, indicating a relatively stable distribution of porosity values. Specifically, the samples with a porosity of 2%–8% account for 66.96% (Figure 9d–f). Furthermore, Zone B is classified as a pore-type reservoir, which is characterized by medium porosity and medium permeability, demonstrating the best reservoir performance among all zones analyzed in the study area (Table 1).
In Zone C, the predominant reservoir rocks consist of grain dolomite and microbial dolomite. The reservoir spaces include interparticle pores, growth-framework pores, and a few dissolved pores. The original pores are well developed, but most of the pores are fully infilled with late-stage anhydrite cements. The porosity values observed range from 0.61% to 9.25% (3.15% ± 2.23%), predominantly falling below 2%, as indicated by 41.18% of the total samples analyzed (Figure 9g–i). Zone C is identified as a pore-to-fracture-type reservoir, which is characterized by low porosity and medium permeability, exhibiting poor physical properties (Table 1). Compared with Zones A and B, Zone C exhibits an increase in infillings within the pore spaces.
In Zone D, the predominant reservoir rocks are mainly microbial dolomites, including binding dolarenite, thrombolite, and stromatolite. The reservoir spaces consist of growth-framework (dissolved) pores, with a limited presence of interparticle pores and micropores between infillings. Some larger pores are infilled with anhydrite or calcite, while residual micropores are retained. The observed porosity ranges from 0.74% to 14.11%, with an average of 3.92% ± 2.68% (Figure 9j–l), mainly 2%–4% (as 33.73% of the total samples). Zone C is identified as a pore-to-fracture-type reservoir, which is characterized by medium porosity and medium permeability, along with good physical properties (Table 1). Compared with Zone B, the reservoir rocks in Zone D have undergone a transformation into microbial dolomites, accompanied by an increase in the infillings present within the pores.
In Zone E, the reservoir rocks consist of microbial dolomite and micritic dolomite with moldic pores. The reservoir space is composed of growth-framework pores, which are either partially or completely infilled with anhydrite or halite. The observed porosity ranges from 0.16% to 16.05% (1.39% ± 1.72%), mainly <2% (as 87.25% of the total samples). Zone E is identified as a fracture-type reservoir, which is characterized by low porosity and medium permeability, reflecting the worst physical properties in the study area (Table 1).

4.3. Types of Infillings Within Pores

(1)
Vadose silt
Vadose silts are defined as the minute fragments of bedrock and insoluble residues that result from the disintegration of bedrock during the process of karstification. These silts encompass fine dolomite powder, sand-sized particles, and fragments of growth frameworks, which are frequently deposited in karst channels (roughly) in situ [29,30]. Vadose silts exhibit a relatively loose structure and contain a significant number of micropores (Figure 5, Figure 7 and Figure 8). This type of infilling is a typical byproduct of karstification and is particularly prevalent in the study area, especially Zones B, D, and E (Figure 5, Figure 7 and Figure 8).
(2)
Calcite and dolomite cements
This type of infilling contains medium-grained calcite and fine- to medium-grained dolomite. These cements partially infill primary and secondary karst pores and are frequently associated with vadose silts. These infillings predominantly occur in Zones A and B in the western region of the study area (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The dolomite cements exhibit a foggy center, a clear rim, and a dissolved edge, and they locally infill the interparticle pores in Zone A (Figure 4).
(3)
Anhydrite cements
In the core samples, the anhydrite cements are observed as isolated or dispersed patches. Microscopic examination reveals that the crystals predominantly exhibit a clotted morphology (Figure 7), indicative of secondary anhydrite [31]. This type of cement fully infills primary pores, dissolved secondary pores, and micropores between vadose silt and is primarily found in Zones C–E, where anhydrites are widely deposited (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8).
(4)
Halite cements
The halite cements are transparent (Figure 8e,f) and infill the dissolved pores and vugs with embayed dissolution edges or distinct particle contours, frequently in conjunction with minor quantities of anhydrite minerals. The low solubility of halite results in the dissolution of halite present on the core surfaces, leaving behind irregularly shaped pores (Figure 8b,c). This type of infilling is highly concentrated and mainly found in Zone E to the west of the Hengshan highland, which is the halite sedimentary zone of the study area (Figure 8).
As one moves from Zone A to Zone E, there is a transition in the reservoir rocks from grain dolomite to microbial dolomite. Additionally, the infillings within pores shift from carbonate minerals to evaporite minerals. Zones B and D exhibit the best reservoir properties, with interparticle dissolved pores and growth-framework dissolved pores. In contrast, Zones A and C exhibit secondary reservoir properties, where the reservoir space is composed of primary pores and a few dissolved pores. Zone E has the worst reservoir properties, containing pores entirely infilled with evaporite minerals.

5. Discussion

5.1. Main Controlling Factors for Reservoir Development

5.1.1. Coupling of Sea-Level Fluctuations with Sedimentary Landforms Controls Reservoir Types

The O2m56 carbonate formations in the central–eastern region of the Ordos Basin are classified as restricted–evaporative platform sediments [17]. Within this restricted shallow marine environment, the sea level fluctuates periodically at a high frequency (Figure 1b) [12], resulting in the development of a thin upward-shallowing cycle with a small thickness of shoals and microbial mounds [14,15]. In addition, high-quality reservoirs are distributed regularly and cyclically below the exposure surfaces of these cycles (Figure 3). During the initial phase of transgression, thin to thick micritic dolomites (approximately 0.4–1.2 m in thickness) were deposited at the bottom of the cycles, occasionally featuring intercrystalline pores, which corresponded to a porosity typically below 1%. In the early regression phase, when the hydrodynamics were strong, high-energy shoals and microbial mounds were deposited, with thicknesses ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 m, and the presence of abundant primary pores, including interparticle and growth-framework pores, resulted in a porosity exceeding 1%. As sea levels continued to decline, the restricted seawater underwent evaporation and salinization, facilitating the deposition of anhydrite and halite at the uppermost sections of the cycles. The reservoir properties improve upwards with the development of shoals/mounds in a single cycle, while the upper evaporite serves as a tight cap rock. Therefore, the combination of high-frequency cycles results in an alternation of high-permeability layers and low-permeability layers, thus enhancing the heterogeneity of reservoir properties in the carbonate–evaporite symbiotic system.
During the sedimentary period of O2m56, the prevailing strong hydrodynamic conditions above the normal wave base facilitated the formation of shoals and microbial mounds in the Taolimiao and Hengshan highlands [17,32,33]. Zone B records the sedimentary environment of dolomitic restricted lagoons, shoals, and microbial mounds. Zone D reflects a transition in sedimentary conditions from a microbial mound/dolomitic–gypsiferous evaporative lagoon to a gypsiferous evaporative lagoon. Zone E is marked by microbial mounds and gypsiferous evaporative lagoons. In contrast, the sedimentary environment in Zone A transitions from a dolomitic restricted lagoon to a shoal, ultimately evolving into a dolomitic–gypsiferous evaporative lagoon. Zone C is characterized by a combination of dolomitic restricted lagoon and gypsiferous evaporative lagoon environments. Notably, the thickness of the shoals and mounds within Zones B and D–E are considerably larger than those found in other zones, whereas the lowland zones predominantly consist of micritic dolomite or layered anhydrite deposits (Figure 3). Therefore, the reservoir quality in Zones B and D is significantly superior to that of the other zones (Figure 9 and Figure 10).
Variations in reservoir characteristics across geomorphic units indicate that shoals were deposited in the western region and that microbial mounds were chiefly found in the eastern region. In the study area, the open seawater was indirectly replenished from the northwest (Figure 1c). The effective isolation of water by the highlands contributes to a reduction of kinetic energy [17], which in turn results in a more restricted environment and an increase in salinity towards the eastern areas. Furthermore, it is significant to note that the range of evaporites has expanded. The halophilic characteristics of microbial rocks [2] result in the massive deposition of microbial dolomite in the eastern regions as salinity increases (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Overall, the coupling of high-frequency sea-level fluctuations and uplift–depression landforms during the sedimentary period determines the hydrodynamic intensity and salinity variations in the study area. This dynamic subsequently influences the distribution and extent of favorable reservoir rocks, including grain dolomite and microbial dolomite, and ultimately constrains the disparities in distribution and quality of various reservoirs [17,32,34,35].

5.1.2. Penecontemporaneous Karstification Controls Pore Morphology and Distribution

Penecontemporaneous karstification is widely acknowledged as a significant genetic mechanism contributing to the formation of high-quality carbonate reservoirs [36,37,38]. During the penecontemporaneous stage, as the strata had not yet entered the burial stage, the rock texture was loose. High-energy sedimentary environments, such as shoals and microbial mounds, exhibited elevated matrix porosity and permeability. Karst water flowed preferentially along the high-permeability layers in the microbial mounds and shoals, with distinct “facies-controlled karst” characteristics [39,40,41].
In the context of regression across the study area, high-frequency oscillations of the relative sea levels led to the preferential exposure of carbonate shoals and microbial mounds deposited on highlands to the water surface. This exposure subjected these formations to form fabric-selective or non-fabric-selective dissolution in the meteoric freshwater seepage zone (Figure 10). The intraparticle dissolved pores and moldic pores formed by fabric-selective dissolution of early metastable minerals (e.g., aragonite and high-magnesium calcite) are an effective indicator of penecontemporaneous karstification. On the other hand, karst water flowed along the high-permeability layers of shoals and microbial mounds and continuously expanded and dissolved the primary interparticle pores [42]. As the dissolution process continued to expand, a karst cavity system emerged [43]. Moreover, due to the arid climate in the sedimentary region and the relative decline in sea levels, the environment became restricted and gradually salinized. This process was conducive to the occurrence of penecontemporaneous dolomitization and the formation of intercrystalline pores [44]. The interplay of these two factors contributed to the formation of significant reservoir spaces, including intraparticle/interparticle dissolved pores, growth-framework pores, intercrystalline (dissolved) pores, and small karst vugs (Figure 10). These features are readily formed in reservoir rocks such as dolarenite, oolitic dolomite, thrombolite, stromatolite, and crystalline dolomite situated beneath the exposure surface, thereby enhancing the reservoir performance of these formations (Figure 3).
In the upward-shallowing cycle, as one progresses from bottom to top, there is a notable increase in the intensity of karstification within the shoals and microbial mounds, leading to improved reservoir properties (Figure 3). In addition, the high-permeability layers formed by karstification further enhance the reservoir heterogeneity during the vertical stacking of these cycles. During the sedimentary period of O2m56, the Hengshan highland was slightly higher than the Taolimiao highland, The carbonate shoals and microbial mounds that have formed on the Hengshan highland are preferentially exposed above the water surface. This resulted in an extended and vigorous karstification process, which ultimately resulted in the formation of karst breccia and vadose silt at the top of the cycle, ultimately diminishing reservoir properties (Figure 3②,④). However, this phenomenon occurs locally in the study area. Overall, the karstification caused by high-frequency exposure during the penecontemporaneous period plays a crucial role in enhancing porosity and generating new types of reservoir spaces (Figure 10).

5.2. Differential Preservation Mechanism of Reservoirs

The favorable reservoirs within carbonate shoals and microbial mounds deposited in highlands serve as the foundational material for reservoir development. Concurrently, penecontemporaneous karstification is the diagenesis process that improves reservoir performance. The coupling of these two factors controls the formation of high-quality reservoirs. In the carbonate–evaporite symbiotic system, the key to reservoir preservation lies in the filling process [41]. Based on the petrological characteristics of aforementioned reservoirs, it is evident that variations in seawater properties influence the differential infilling of reservoirs across geomorphic units and determine the varying states of reservoir preservation (Figure 10).
The highlands exhibited a susceptibility to karstification, especially in Zones D and E (Figure 5, Figure 7 and Figure 8). The carbonate shoals and microbial mounds on the highlands were subjected to prolonged exposure and underwent extensive karstification that led to the formation of karst channels, with the pores and vugs infilled with vadose silt. However, these relatively loose infillings may contain a large number of residual micropores, which have a minimal impact on the reservoir quality. In addition, the medium-grained calcite cements are also clearly controlled by karstification, and they are the cements of residual meteoric freshwater in the pores during the burial stage [28]. Zones A and B in the western part of the study area (Figure 4 and Figure 5) record relatively weak karstification, slow pore water flow, and limited material exchange between pores. Following the dissolution of the matrix by residual meteoric freshwater, the saturation of calcium carbonate increases, which is conducive to the precipitation of low-magnesium calcite in primary and secondary karst pores [45], thereby forming abundant residual pores. The heightened intensity of karstification, coupled with accelerated pore water flow and material exchange, has led to only limited sedimentation of medium-grained calcite in certain areas (Figure 7k,l).
The phenomenon of evaporite mineral filling in reservoirs is prevalent in inter-salt and pre-salt formations [16]. The typical example is the Cambrian inter-salt reservoirs in Oman [7]. In the study area, the primary infillings are anhydrite in Zones C and D, while halite predominates in Zone E. The pores with embayed dissolution edges that are either partially or fully infilled suggests that evaporite minerals deposit in the burial stage, after early penecontemporaneous karstification (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Simultaneously, the acidic fluids generated during the evolution of hydrocarbons can lead to the dissolution and reprecipitation of evaporite minerals [7] (Figure 7i).
The Taolimiao highland and Hengshan highland act as a barrier to the supply of seawater from the northwest. This obstruction results in the gradual restricted sedimentary environment of the Taolimiao depression and the East salty depression, ultimately leading to an increase in seawater salinity [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Afterwards, gypsiferous evaporative lagoon and salty evaporative lagoon environments were successively formed. Hypersaline brine formed by dissolution of the evaporite layer at the top of the cycles, and evaporation of sedimentary seawater flowed back into the karst channels within the blown carbonate. Hypersaline brine is formed by the dissolution of the evaporite layer at the uppermost part of sedimentary cycles, as well as through the evaporation of seawater. This brine flows back into karst channels or high-permeability layers within the mounds and shoals. The evaporation and crystallization of this brine forms multiple types of evaporative minerals [10,16], which then infill the reservoir spaces reworked due to karstification. Compared with Zones C and D, Zone E records a more restricted sedimentary environment, with a significantly high concentration of halite cements, which severely damages the reservoir spaces and makes the reservoir preservation impossible.

5.3. Differential Evolution Paths of Reservoirs in Geomorphic Units

In the restricted–evaporative platform sedimentary environment, the ancient landform with alternating uplift and depression significantly influences the composition and salinity of seawater [17]. Accordingly, reservoir types, karstification, infilling features, and other controlling elements overlap regionally, resulting in pronounced heterogeneity within carbonate reservoirs and a relatively intricate distribution pattern.
In terms of reservoir rocks, Zone B and D, as highlands with strong hydrodynamics during the sedimentary period, respectively develop high-quality reservoir rocks such as thick grain dolomite and microbial dolomite (Figure 11). These rocks exhibit rich primary pores such as interparticle pores and growth-framework pores, suggesting excellent reservoir properties. In contrast, the lowlands are mainly composed of evaporite and thick micritic dolomite deposits, along with thin grain dolomite and microbial dolomite, which generally reflect inferior reservoir properties.
In terms of karstification, O2m56 is distinguished by restricted shallow marine environments and ancient landforms with alternating uplift and depression [17,46]. The highlands and the high-frequency oscillation of sea levels significantly induced the karstification process [30]. On this basis, high-energy lithologies, such as grain dolomite and microbial dolomite, coupled with karstification, controlled the formation of reservoirs [41]. The shoals and mounds in Zones B and D were preferentially exposed, underwent prolonged karstification, and developed extensive irregular cavities and karst channels, thereby enhancing improved reservoir properties. In contrast, the lowlands are primarily characterized by primary pores along with short-term fabric-selective dissolution, featuring intraparticle dissolved pores or moldic pores. These features contribute to an increase in reservoir porosity but have a limited effect on permeability (Figure 11).
In terms of infilling features, the progressive variation in seawater salinity from the western to the eastern regions has resulted in the deposition of anhydrite infilling in the pores within geomorphic units such as Zone C and D, with the most significant accumulation observed in Zone C. In Zone E, a large amount of halite in the primary pores, karst pores, and vugs resulted in the reduction of available reservoir spaces (Figure 11).
In summary, the varying degrees of influence exerted by key controlling factors, including characteristics of shoal and mound reservoirs, karstification, infilling features, and salinity of seawater, play a crucial role in the formation and preservation of the O2m56 reservoirs. The statistical data from drilled reservoirs and the results of gas testing (Figure 12) provide additional validation for the identified distribution of reservoirs, which govern the concentrated development of high-quality reservoirs in Zones B and D.

6. Conclusions

This paper focuses on the Ordovician inter-salt reservoir developed in the Ordos Basin, North China. By integrating geomorphological analysis, the research investigates the influences of seawater energy, salinity, and meteoric freshwater leaching on the formation and distribution of the reservoir. This research systematically clarifies the origin of the north–south distribution of inter-salt reservoirs in O2m56, which provides valuable insights for subsequent studies of inter-salt reservoirs with similar geological conditions. The specific research conclusions are as follows:
  • Shoal and microbial mound reservoirs developed in highlands. However, the dolomitic restricted lagoon (Zone A) and the gypsiferous evaporative lagoon (Zone C) developed in depressions.
  • The physical properties of reservoirs in highlands are evidently superior to those found in depressions. In Zones A and B, various reservoir spaces are present, including interparticle dissolved pores, growth-framework dissolved pores, and channels. Concurrently, these reservoir spaces are filled with calcite, anhydrite, and halite, with a distribution that transitions from west to east.
  • In a restricted–evaporative platform environment, highlands are more prone to karstification, which results in the formation of numerous dissolution pores and vugs that enhance the physical properties of reservoirs.
  • The geomorphology of alternating uplift and depression in the study area constrains the gradual increase in seawater salinity from west to east. This process controls the distribution of reservoirs, with mounds deposited in the east and shoals deposited in the west. Moreover, the high salinity of pore water leads to the precipitation of evaporite minerals, which infills the pores and weakens the physical properties of the reservoirs. This mechanism is crucial for the preservation of the reservoirs. In general, the formation and preservation of reservoirs in O2m56 are influenced by a combination of factors, including reservoir rocks, karstification, and infilling features.
  • An interesting phenomenon revealed in this study is that variations in the salinity of seawater from west to east lead to alterations in the types of cements found in reservoir spaces. This study mainly focused on the petrological characterization and the analysis of reservoir genetic models. The availability of abundant core samples in the study area facilitates a quantitative assessment of the formation and degradation of reservoirs under varying degrees of salinity of seawater in future investigations. Furthermore, when integrated with the geochemical characteristics of inter-salt reservoirs, this area presents an optimal subject for analyzing the properties of diagenetic fluids across different salinity environments.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, M.Y.; methodology, X.T.; conceptualization, Z.F.; resources, Z.L., W.N. and J.X.; funding acquisition, Y.X.; writing—review and editing, D.X.; investigation, S.Z. and J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42302139).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate for the editors’ warm help and great patience, as well as the anonymous reviewers’ thoughtful comments and constructive suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

Zhaolei Fei is employee of Geological Exploration and Development Research Institute of CCDC. Zixing Lu, Wancai Nie, and Jie Xu are employees of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company. The paper reflects the views of the scientists and not the company.

References

  1. Warren, J.K. Evaporites through time: Tectonic, climatic and eustatic controls in marine and nonmarine deposit. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2010, 98, 217–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, A.; Shen, A.; Yang, H. Dolomite genesis and reservoir-cap rock assemblage in carbonate evaporite paragenesis system. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2019, 46, 916–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anjos Sylvia, M.C.; Sombra Cristiano, L.; Spadini Adali, R. Petroleum exploration and production in Brazil: From onshore to ultra-deepwaters. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2024, 51, 796–806. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dou, L.; Wen, Z.; Wang, Z. Sedimentary build-ups of pre-salt isolated carbonate platforms and formation of deep-water giant oil fields in Santos Basin, Brazil. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2024, 51, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Afifi, A.M. Ghawar: The anatomy of the world’s largest oil field. AAPG Search Discov. 2005, 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  6. O’Hearn, T.; Elliott, S.; Samsonov, A. Karachaganak field, northern Pre-Caspian Basin, northwestern Kazakhstan. In Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade 1990–1999: AAPG Memoir; Halbouty, M.T., Ed.; American Association of Petroleum Geologists: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2003; Volume 78, pp. 237–250. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schoenherr, J.; Reuning, L.; Kukla, P.A. Halite cementation and carbonate diagenesis of intra-salt reservoirs from the Late Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian Ara Group (South Oman Salt Basin). Sedimentology 2009, 56, 567–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jafarian, A.; Javanbakht, M.; Koeshidayatullah, A. Paleoenvironmental, diagenetic, and eustatic controls on the Permo–Triassic carbonate–evaporite reservoir quality, Upper Dalan and Kangan formations, Lavan Gas Field, Zagros Basin. Geol. J. 2018, 53, 1442–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amel, H.; Jafarian, A.; Husinec, A. Microfacies, depositional environment and diagenetic evolution controls on the reservoir quality of the Permian Upper Dalan Formation, Kish Gas Field, Zagros Basin. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 67, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Beigi, M.; Jafarian, A.; Javanbakht, M.H. Facies analysis, diagenesis and sequence stratigraphy of the carbonate-evaporite succession of the Upper Jurassic Surmeh Formation: Impacts on reservoir quality (Salman Oil Field, Persian Gulf, Iran). J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2017, 129, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sorento, T.; Olaussen, S.; Stemmerik, L. Controls on deposition of shallow marine carbonates and evaporites–lower Permian Gipshuken Formation, central Spitsbergen, Arctic Norway. Sedimentology 2020, 67, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhong, S.; Tan, X.; Nie, W. High-frequency cyclic sequence of the Ma56 submember of Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin: Indication for sea-level change and sedimentary differentiation effect of Hengshan uplift. J. Palaeogeogr. Chin. Ed. 2022, 24, 245–260. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brito, A.S.; Nogueira, A.C.R.; Dos Santos, R.F. High-frequency palaeoenvironmental changes in the mixed siliciclastic–carbonate sedimentary system from a lower Permian restricted basin (West Gondwana, southern Brazil). Sedimentology 2024, 71, 1515–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiong, Y.; Tan, X.; Dong, G. Diagenetic differentiation in the Ordovician Majiagou Formation, Ordos Basin, China: Facies, geochemical and reservoir heterogeneity constraints. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 191, 107179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, M.; Xiong, Y.; Xiong, C. Evolution of diagenetic system and its controls on the reservoir quality of pre-salt dolostone: The case of the Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation in the central Ordos Basin, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2020, 122, 104674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, S.; Tan, X.; Chen, L. Dense brine refluxing: A new genetic interpretation of widespread anhydrite lumps in the Oligocene–Lower Miocene Asmari Formation of the Zagros foreland basin, NE Iraq. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019, 101, 373–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhong, S.; Tan, X.; Hu, G. Control of paleogeographic pattern on sedimentary differentiation of evaporite-carbonate symbiotic system: A case study of the sixth sub-member of Ordovician Majiagou Formation M5 Member in central-eastern Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2022, 49, 728–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ding, C.; Gao, X.; Dong, G. Characteristics, genesis and distribution of the Ordovician pre-salt dolomite reservoirs in Ordos Basin. Mar. Orig. Pet. Geol. 2021, 26, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
  19. He, D.; Bao, H.; Kai, B. Critical tectonic modification periods and its geologic features of Ordos Basin and adjacent area. Acta Pet. Sin. 2021, 42, 1255–1269. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, Y.; Du, Y.; Cawood, P.A. Provenance record of a foreland basin: Detrital zircon U–Pb ages from Devonian strata in the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China. Tectonophysics 2010, 495, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, J.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, S. Lithofacies paleogeography and sedimentary environment in Ordovician Majiagou Formation, eastern Ordos Basin. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2009, 20, 316324. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Xing, E.; Wang, Z. Evolution of lithofacies paleogeography in the Ordos Basin and its implication of potash formation. Acta Geol. Sin. 2015, 89, 1921–1935. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, Y.; Tan, X.; Liu, X. Sedimentary Characteristics and Distribution of Grain Shoals of Ma57 Submember in the Central Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2018, 36, 796–806. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, A.; Xu, S.; Yang, S. Ordovician deep dolomite reservoirs in the intracratonic Ordos Basin, China: Depositional model and Diagenetic evolution. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2018, 36, 850–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Fu, J. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography of the Ordovician in Ordos Basin, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2012, 33, 95–109. [Google Scholar]
  26. SYT6385-2016; Method for Determination of Rock Porosity and Permeability Under Overburden Pressure. National Energy Administration: Beijing, China, 2016. Available online: https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF/English.aspx/SYT6385-2016?Redirect (accessed on 5 January 2025).
  27. Suarez-Gonzalez, P.; Benito, M.I.; Quijada, I.E. ‘Trapping and binding’: A review of the factors controlling the development of fossil agglutinated microbialites and their distribution in space and time. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2019, 194, 182–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moore, C.H.; Wade, W.J. Carbonate Reservoirs: Porosity and Diagenesis in a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xie, K.; Tan, X.; Feng, M. Eogenetic karst and its control on reservoirs in the Ordovician Majiagou Formation, eastern Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2021, 47, 1246–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiong, Y.; Tan, X.; Zhong, S. Dynamic paleokarst geochemistry within 130 Myr in the Middle Ordovician Shanganning carbonate platform, North China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2022, 591, 110879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aleali, M.; Rahimpour-Bonab, H.; Moussavi-Harami, R. Environmental and sequence stratigraphic implications of anhydrite textures: A case from the Lower Triassic of the Central Persian Gulf. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 75, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.; Hu, M.; Zhang, S. Characteristics and impacts on favorable reservoirs of carbonate ramp microfacies: A case study of the Middle-Lower Ordovician in Gucheng area, Tarim Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2022, 49, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, L.; Zhao, J.; Su, Z. Distribution and depositional model of microbial carbonates in the Ordovician middle assemblage, Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2021, 48, 1162–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Y.; Hu, M.; Zhang, S. Types, structural evolution difference and petroleum geological significance of Cambrian-Ordovician carbonate platforms in Gucheng-Xiaotang area, Tarim Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2022, 49, 884–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. He, Q.; Shi, K.; Ma, Y. Evolution of rimmed carbonate platform architecture controlled by sea-level change: Insights from the Lower-Middle Cambrian of the Northern Tarim Basin, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2025, 171, 107215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, B.; Liu, J. Classification and characteristics of karst reservoirs in China and related theories. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2009, 36, 12–29. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, W.; Shen, A.; Hu, A. A Discussion on the geological background of marine carbonate reservoirs development in Tarim, Sichuan and Ordos Basin, China. Acta Pet. Sin. 2015, 31, 3495–3508. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shen, A.; Zhao, W.; Hu, A. Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2015, 42, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. James, N.P.; Choquette, P.W. Paleokarst; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 1–416. [Google Scholar]
  40. Xiao, D.; Tan, X.; Xi, A. An inland facies-controlled eogenetic karst of the carbonate reservoir in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southern Sichuan Basin, SW China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2016, 72, 218–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yılmaz, İ.Ö.; Altıner, D. Cyclic palaeokarst surfaces in Aptian peritidal carbonate successions (Taurides, southwest Turkey): Internal structure and response to mid-Aptian sea-level fall. Cretac. Res. 2006, 27, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baceta, J.I.; Wright, V.P.; Beavington-Penney, S.J.; Pujalte, V. Palaeohydrogeological control of palaeokarst macro-porosity genesis during a major sea-level lowstand: Danian of the Urbasa–Andia plateau, Navarra, North Spain. Sediment. Geol. 2007, 199, 141–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Loucks, R.G. Paleocave carbonate reservoirs: Origins, burial-depth modifications, spatial complexity, and reservoir implications. AAPG Bull. 1999, 83, 1795–1834. [Google Scholar]
  44. Warren, J. Dolomite: Occurrence, evolution and economically important associations. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2000, 52, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; He, Z. Controlling factors of meteoric diagenesis in karst reservoirs: An example from the majiagou formation, ordos basin, China. Minerals 2023, 13, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wei, L.; Chen, H.; Guo, W. Wushen-Jingbian Paleo-uplift and its control on the Ordovician subsalt deposition and reservoirs in Ordos Basin. Oil Gas Geol. 2021, 42, 391–400+521. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geologic setting of the Ordos Basin. (a) Lithofacies paleogeographic map of the North China Plate and location of the Ordos Basin (after [24]). (b) Classification of Ordovician strata and evolution of sea-level change in the Ordos Basin (after [25]). (c) Paleogeomorphological map of O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin (modified after [17]). (d) Geomorphic section of O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin (TWD is Taolimiao west depression; TH is Taolimiao highland; TED is Taolimiao east depression; HH highland is Hengshan highland; ESD is East salty depression).
Figure 1. Geologic setting of the Ordos Basin. (a) Lithofacies paleogeographic map of the North China Plate and location of the Ordos Basin (after [24]). (b) Classification of Ordovician strata and evolution of sea-level change in the Ordos Basin (after [25]). (c) Paleogeomorphological map of O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin (modified after [17]). (d) Geomorphic section of O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin (TWD is Taolimiao west depression; TH is Taolimiao highland; TED is Taolimiao east depression; HH highland is Hengshan highland; ESD is East salty depression).
Minerals 15 00236 g001
Figure 2. Lithological sequence correlation profile of O2m56 across central–eastern Ordos Basin (profile location shown in Figure 1c).
Figure 2. Lithological sequence correlation profile of O2m56 across central–eastern Ordos Basin (profile location shown in Figure 1c).
Minerals 15 00236 g002
Figure 3. Lithological sequence, karstification intensity, and reservoir properties of geomorphic units in central–eastern Ordos Basin (AB is the breccia of anhydrite; section cross Wells T105–T78–JT1–T112–J5, with the location shown in Figure 1c; location of the coring interval is shown in red bar in Figure 2).
Figure 3. Lithological sequence, karstification intensity, and reservoir properties of geomorphic units in central–eastern Ordos Basin (AB is the breccia of anhydrite; section cross Wells T105–T78–JT1–T112–J5, with the location shown in Figure 1c; location of the coring interval is shown in red bar in Figure 2).
Minerals 15 00236 g003
Figure 4. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone A. (a) Dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite, Well T105, 3668.52 m. (b) Dolarenite, Well T62, 3625.60 m. (c) Crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3678.40 m. (d) Micritic-crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3668.96 m. (e) Dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite, Well T105, 3668.52 m, with interparticle dissolved pores. (f) Dolarenite, Well T62, 3625.60 m, with interparticle dissolved pores infilled with dolomite and vadose silt. (g) Crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3678.40 m, with moldic pores and dissolved fractures, residual particles visible. The pores are suspected to contain solid bitumen. (h) Crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3724.00 m, with intercrystalline micropores. The pores are suspected to contain solid bitumen. (i) Micritic-crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3668.96 m, with bedding intercrystalline dissolved pores.
Figure 4. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone A. (a) Dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite, Well T105, 3668.52 m. (b) Dolarenite, Well T62, 3625.60 m. (c) Crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3678.40 m. (d) Micritic-crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3668.96 m. (e) Dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite, Well T105, 3668.52 m, with interparticle dissolved pores. (f) Dolarenite, Well T62, 3625.60 m, with interparticle dissolved pores infilled with dolomite and vadose silt. (g) Crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3678.40 m, with moldic pores and dissolved fractures, residual particles visible. The pores are suspected to contain solid bitumen. (h) Crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3724.00 m, with intercrystalline micropores. The pores are suspected to contain solid bitumen. (i) Micritic-crystalline dolomite, Well T105, 3668.96 m, with bedding intercrystalline dissolved pores.
Minerals 15 00236 g004
Figure 5. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone B. (a) Dolarenite, Well Sh367, 3903.75 m. (b) Oolitic dolomite, Well T78, 3765.20 m. (c) Thrombolite, Well L105, 3987.83 m. (d) Caves are infilled with breccia, Well T78, 3764.36 m. (e) Dolarenite, Well Sh367, 3903.75 m, with interparticle dissolved pores, infilled with saddle-shaped dolomite and anhydrite. (f) Micritic dolomite with sand-sized particles, Well T78, 3764.80 m, with intercrystalline dissolved pores and moldic pores. (g) Oolitic dolomite, Well T78, 3765.20 m, with intraparticle dissolved pores and channel. The channel is infilled with saddle-shaped dolomite. (h) Binding dolarenite, Well T78, 3764.59 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores. (i) Thrombolite, Well L105, 3987.83 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores. The lower part is deposited with binding dolarenite. (j) Thrombolite, Well L105, 3987.83 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores, infilled with dolomite. (k) Crystalline dolomite, Well T78, 3760.98 m, with small irregular cavities partly infilled with vadose silt and calcite. (l) Karst breccia dolomite, Well L105, 3986.45 m, with residual micropores. The channel is infilled with vadose silt and saddle-shaped dolomite.
Figure 5. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone B. (a) Dolarenite, Well Sh367, 3903.75 m. (b) Oolitic dolomite, Well T78, 3765.20 m. (c) Thrombolite, Well L105, 3987.83 m. (d) Caves are infilled with breccia, Well T78, 3764.36 m. (e) Dolarenite, Well Sh367, 3903.75 m, with interparticle dissolved pores, infilled with saddle-shaped dolomite and anhydrite. (f) Micritic dolomite with sand-sized particles, Well T78, 3764.80 m, with intercrystalline dissolved pores and moldic pores. (g) Oolitic dolomite, Well T78, 3765.20 m, with intraparticle dissolved pores and channel. The channel is infilled with saddle-shaped dolomite. (h) Binding dolarenite, Well T78, 3764.59 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores. (i) Thrombolite, Well L105, 3987.83 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores. The lower part is deposited with binding dolarenite. (j) Thrombolite, Well L105, 3987.83 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores, infilled with dolomite. (k) Crystalline dolomite, Well T78, 3760.98 m, with small irregular cavities partly infilled with vadose silt and calcite. (l) Karst breccia dolomite, Well L105, 3986.45 m, with residual micropores. The channel is infilled with vadose silt and saddle-shaped dolomite.
Minerals 15 00236 g005
Figure 6. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone C. (a) Dolarenite, Well L136, 4107.05 m. (b) Dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite, Well L136, 4112.58 m, locally with fractures, infilled with anhydrite. (c) Thrombolite, Well L136, 4109.30 m. (d) Crystalline dolomite, Well JT1, 3657.30 m, with intercrystalline dissolved pores infilled with dolomite. (e) Dolarenite, Well L136, 4107.05 m, with interparticle pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (f) Dolarenite, Well L136, 4107.05 m, with interparticle pores fully infilled with anhydrite, cross-polarized image. (g) Rudaceous dolomite, Well J2, 3581.88 m, with interparticle pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (h) Thrombolite, Well JT1, 3651.30 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores. (i) Thrombolite, Well L136, 4109.30 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite.
Figure 6. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone C. (a) Dolarenite, Well L136, 4107.05 m. (b) Dolarenite/rudaceous dolomite, Well L136, 4112.58 m, locally with fractures, infilled with anhydrite. (c) Thrombolite, Well L136, 4109.30 m. (d) Crystalline dolomite, Well JT1, 3657.30 m, with intercrystalline dissolved pores infilled with dolomite. (e) Dolarenite, Well L136, 4107.05 m, with interparticle pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (f) Dolarenite, Well L136, 4107.05 m, with interparticle pores fully infilled with anhydrite, cross-polarized image. (g) Rudaceous dolomite, Well J2, 3581.88 m, with interparticle pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (h) Thrombolite, Well JT1, 3651.30 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores. (i) Thrombolite, Well L136, 4109.30 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite.
Minerals 15 00236 g006
Figure 7. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone D. (a) Thrombolite, Well Tong 8, 3331.09 m. (b) Stromatolite and thrombolite, Well T112, 3378.16 m, with suture line and growth-framework dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (c) Thrombolite, Well T112, 3373.83 m, with dissolved pores and the growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with anhydrite. (d) Crystalline dolomite, Well T112, 3386.29 m, with karst caves fully infilled with anhydrite. (e) Thrombolite, Well T112, 3374.79 m, with residual growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with anhydrite. (f) Thrombolite, Well Tong8, 3331.09 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with anhydrite and calcite. (g) Rudaceous oolitic dolomite, Well T112, 3344.32 m, with intraparticle dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (h) Rudaceous oolitic dolomite, Well T112, 3344.32 m, with intraparticle dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite, cross-polarized image. (i) Crystalline dolomite, Well T112, 3386.29 m, with karst caves fully infilled with anhydrite. There is suspected solid bitumen located between the anhydrite and the bedrock. (j) Crystalline dolomite, Well T112, 3386.29 m, with karst caves fully infilled with anhydrite inside, cross-polarized image. (k) Thrombolite, Well T112, 3374.54 m, with intercrystalline dissolved pores and growth-framework dissolved pores inside. (l) Karst breccia dolomite, Well T112, 3354.96 m, with channel infilled with vadose silt, mud, calcite and anhydrite.
Figure 7. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoirs in Zone D. (a) Thrombolite, Well Tong 8, 3331.09 m. (b) Stromatolite and thrombolite, Well T112, 3378.16 m, with suture line and growth-framework dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (c) Thrombolite, Well T112, 3373.83 m, with dissolved pores and the growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with anhydrite. (d) Crystalline dolomite, Well T112, 3386.29 m, with karst caves fully infilled with anhydrite. (e) Thrombolite, Well T112, 3374.79 m, with residual growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with anhydrite. (f) Thrombolite, Well Tong8, 3331.09 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with anhydrite and calcite. (g) Rudaceous oolitic dolomite, Well T112, 3344.32 m, with intraparticle dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite. (h) Rudaceous oolitic dolomite, Well T112, 3344.32 m, with intraparticle dissolved pores fully infilled with anhydrite, cross-polarized image. (i) Crystalline dolomite, Well T112, 3386.29 m, with karst caves fully infilled with anhydrite. There is suspected solid bitumen located between the anhydrite and the bedrock. (j) Crystalline dolomite, Well T112, 3386.29 m, with karst caves fully infilled with anhydrite inside, cross-polarized image. (k) Thrombolite, Well T112, 3374.54 m, with intercrystalline dissolved pores and growth-framework dissolved pores inside. (l) Karst breccia dolomite, Well T112, 3354.96 m, with channel infilled with vadose silt, mud, calcite and anhydrite.
Minerals 15 00236 g007
Figure 8. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoir in Zone E. (a) Binding dolarenite, Well J5, 3542.08 m, with moldic pores and small irregular cavities. (b) Crystalline dolomite, Well T38, 3630.63 m, with moldic pores infilled with halite, occasionally partially infilled with anhydrite. (c) Crystalline dolomite, Well J5, 3532.89 m, with moldic pores infilled with halite, as well as visible extensive irregular cavities. (d) Micritic dolomite with sand-sized particles, Well J5, 3542.45 m, with small irregular cavities partly infilled with vadose silt. (e) Micritic dolarenite, Well J5, 3542.08 m, with moldic pores. (f) Thrombolite, Well Tong79, 3696.63 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with halite. (g) Breccia dolomite, Well Tong79, 3685.69 m, infilled with anhydrite between the breccias. (h) Anhydrite-brecciated dolomite, Well Tong79, 3683.52 m, with metasomatic anhydrite between breccias, as well as plane-polarized light. (i) Anhydrite-brecciated dolomite, Well Tong79, 3683.52 m, with metasomatic anhydrite between breccias, cross-polarized image.
Figure 8. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of O2m56 reservoir in Zone E. (a) Binding dolarenite, Well J5, 3542.08 m, with moldic pores and small irregular cavities. (b) Crystalline dolomite, Well T38, 3630.63 m, with moldic pores infilled with halite, occasionally partially infilled with anhydrite. (c) Crystalline dolomite, Well J5, 3532.89 m, with moldic pores infilled with halite, as well as visible extensive irregular cavities. (d) Micritic dolomite with sand-sized particles, Well J5, 3542.45 m, with small irregular cavities partly infilled with vadose silt. (e) Micritic dolarenite, Well J5, 3542.08 m, with moldic pores. (f) Thrombolite, Well Tong79, 3696.63 m, with growth-framework dissolved pores infilled with halite. (g) Breccia dolomite, Well Tong79, 3685.69 m, infilled with anhydrite between the breccias. (h) Anhydrite-brecciated dolomite, Well Tong79, 3683.52 m, with metasomatic anhydrite between breccias, as well as plane-polarized light. (i) Anhydrite-brecciated dolomite, Well Tong79, 3683.52 m, with metasomatic anhydrite between breccias, cross-polarized image.
Minerals 15 00236 g008
Figure 9. Reservoir properties of geomorphic units in O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin. (a) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone A. (b) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone A. (c) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone A (d) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone B. (e) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone B (f) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone B (g) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone C. (h) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone C (i) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone C (j) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone D. (k) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone D (l) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone D (m) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone E. (n) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone E (o) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone E.
Figure 9. Reservoir properties of geomorphic units in O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin. (a) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone A. (b) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone A. (c) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone A (d) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone B. (e) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone B (f) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone B (g) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone C. (h) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone C (i) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone C (j) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone D. (k) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone D (l) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone D (m) Scatter plot of porosity and permeability of core samples in Zone E. (n) Histogram of porosity distribution for core samples in Zone E (o) Histogram of permeability distribution for core samples in Zone E.
Minerals 15 00236 g009
Figure 10. Evolution model of O2m56 reservoir in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Figure 10. Evolution model of O2m56 reservoir in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Minerals 15 00236 g010
Figure 11. Controlling factors of O2m56 reservoirs in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Figure 11. Controlling factors of O2m56 reservoirs in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Minerals 15 00236 g011
Figure 12. Thickness map of O2m56 reservoirs in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Figure 12. Thickness map of O2m56 reservoirs in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Minerals 15 00236 g012
Table 1. Reservoir rocks, reservoir spaces, infilling features, and physical properties of reservoirs in geomorphic units in O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Table 1. Reservoir rocks, reservoir spaces, infilling features, and physical properties of reservoirs in geomorphic units in O2m56 in central–eastern Ordos Basin.
Geomorphic UnitReservoir RocksMain Reservoir Space TypesInfilling FeaturesPhysical Properties
Zone AMainly grain dolomite, along with a few crystalline dolomite and microbial dolomiteMainly interparticle pores, with a few moldic pores (intraparticle dissolution) and intercrystalline dissolved pores Pore-type spaceCalcite and dolomite cements, and a minor quantity of vadose siltsModerate
Zone BMainly interparticle dissolved pores, with a few growth-framework dissolved pores and intercrystalline dissolved pores A minor quantity of carbonate cementsExcellent
Zone CGrain dolomite and microbial dolomiteInterparticle pores and growth-framework pores, with a few dissolved poresPore- to fracture-type spaceAnhydrite cements almost infillingPoor
Zone DMainly microbial dolomite, along with a few binding dolareniteMainly growth-framework (dissolved) pores, with a few interparticle pores and residual dissolved micropores Anhydrite or calcite partially infilling Good
Zone EMoldic pores (anhydrite moldic pores/salt moldic pores), growth-framework pores, strong karst channels Fracture-type spaceAnhydrite and halite almost infillingPoor
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, M.; Tan, X.; Fei, Z.; Lu, Z.; Nie, W.; Xiong, Y.; Xiao, D.; Xu, J.; Zhong, S.; Yong, J. Differential Evolution and Main Controlling Factors of Inner-Platform Carbonate Reservoirs in Restricted–Evaporative Environment: A Case Study of O2m56 in the Ordos Basin, North China. Minerals 2025, 15, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030236

AMA Style

Yang M, Tan X, Fei Z, Lu Z, Nie W, Xiong Y, Xiao D, Xu J, Zhong S, Yong J. Differential Evolution and Main Controlling Factors of Inner-Platform Carbonate Reservoirs in Restricted–Evaporative Environment: A Case Study of O2m56 in the Ordos Basin, North China. Minerals. 2025; 15(3):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Mengying, Xiucheng Tan, Zhaolei Fei, Zixing Lu, Wancai Nie, Ying Xiong, Di Xiao, Jie Xu, Shoukang Zhong, and Jingkang Yong. 2025. "Differential Evolution and Main Controlling Factors of Inner-Platform Carbonate Reservoirs in Restricted–Evaporative Environment: A Case Study of O2m56 in the Ordos Basin, North China" Minerals 15, no. 3: 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030236

APA Style

Yang, M., Tan, X., Fei, Z., Lu, Z., Nie, W., Xiong, Y., Xiao, D., Xu, J., Zhong, S., & Yong, J. (2025). Differential Evolution and Main Controlling Factors of Inner-Platform Carbonate Reservoirs in Restricted–Evaporative Environment: A Case Study of O2m56 in the Ordos Basin, North China. Minerals, 15(3), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop