Next Article in Journal
Correction: Chikanda et al. Magmatic-Hydrothermal Processes Associated with Rare Earth Element Enrichment in the Kangankunde Carbonatite Complex, Malawi. Minerals 2019, 9, 442
Previous Article in Journal
Middle Jurassic Reservoir Characterization in the Central Sichuan Basin, SW China: Implications for Oil Exploration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrothermal Monazite Geochemistry and Petrochronology Signatures: Metallogenic Age and Tectonic Evolution Model of the Koka Gold Deposit, Eritrea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zircon U-Pb Age, Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Diabase in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan Province

1
Institute of Geological Survey of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
3
Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Central South University, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China
4
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
5
School of Earth Sciences and Spatial Information Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(11), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111190
Submission received: 16 September 2025 / Revised: 6 November 2025 / Accepted: 8 November 2025 / Published: 13 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Granitic Magmas in Porphyry, Epithermal, and Skarn Deposits)

Abstract

The Yanlinsi gold deposit, located in the middle section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt, is one of the typical gold deposits in northeastern Hunan Province. Diabase dikes are exposed by underground workings and drill holes in the mining area. The dikes strike NW and cut the NE-trending gold ore body. To investigate the petrogenetic age, characteristics of the magmatic source area, and tectonic setting of the diabase dikes in the Yanlinsi gold mining area, northeastern Hunan, and to determine the mineralization age of the deposit, in this paper, diabase dike LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating, whole-rock geochemistry, and gold-bearing quartz vein LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating were studied. The results of LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating indicate that the diabase was emplaced at an age of 219.5 Ma, belonging to the late Indosinian. The investigated diabase dikes are characterized by low SiO2 (43.68%–46.55%), high MgO (7.78%–9.84%), and high Mg# (65.0–68.7) values, belonging to the alkaline basalt series with high potassium. The chondrite-normalized REEs patterns show highly fractionated LREEs and HREEs ((La/Yb)N = 11.21–14.82), and the primitive mantle-normalized spider patterns show enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (e.g., Rb, Ba, K and Sr) and relative depletion in high field strength elements (e.g., Nb, Ta, and P), similar to those of ocean island-like basalt (OIB). Rock geochemical characteristics indicate that the magma of the Yanlinsi diabase was formed by partial melting of the enriched mantle (EM II), with the source region being spinel-garnet lherzolite. The degree of partial melting was approximately 10%–15%, and the assimilation and contamination with continental crustal materials were weak. Meanwhile, weak fractional crystallization of olivine, clinopyroxene, and apatite occurred during the magma evolution process. On the basis of a synthesis of previous research results, it is concluded that the Yanlinsi diabase formed in an extensional tectonic setting after intracontinental collisional orogeny. The LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age of hydrothermal zircons from quartz veins in the main mineralization stage of the Yanlinsi gold deposit is 421.9 ± 1.5 Ma. Combined with the cross-cutting relationships between mafic dikes and gold veins (ore bodies), it is determined that the main mineralization stage of the deposit formed during the Caledonian Period.

1. Introduction

The northeastern Hunan region is located in the middle segment of the Jiangnan orogenic belt, which lies in the junction zone between the Yangtze block and the Cathaysia block (Figure 1a). The multi-stage and multi-phase tectonic evolution of this region [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] enables it to play an important role in explaining the amalgamation and evolutionary process of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks, as well as the lithospheric structure of south China and regional metallogenic regularity [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Intense magmatic activity has occurred in northeastern Hunan, forming intermediate-acid intrusions (dikes) and a small number of mafic dikes. Previous studies have focused relatively more on intermediate-acid magmatic rocks [8,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], while relatively less attention has been paid to mafic magmatic activity in the region [25,26,27]. In particular, regarding research on Indosinian-period mafic dikes in the region, only Zhou Chao et al. [27] have conducted studies on the chronology (zircon U-Pb age of 225 Ma), whole-rock geochemistry, isotope geochemistry, and petrogenetic tectonic setting of the diabase dikes in the Tuanshanbei gold mining area, northeastern Hunan. Meanwhile, there are numerous gold deposits in the Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang area of northeastern Hunan, and previous researchers have carried out extensive studies on the characteristics, genesis, and chronological background of these gold deposits [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Among these topics, the mineralization age of the gold deposits in the region remains highly controversial, with different viewpoints such as Indosinian-period mineralization and Yanshanian-period mineralization [11,29,36,38]. In recent years, reports have indicated that there is also Caledonian-period mineralization in this area [36,39,40].
The Yanlinsi gold deposit is a typical gold deposit in the Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang area of northeastern Hunan Province. Previous studies have extensively investigated various aspects of this deposit, including its geological features, ore-forming material sources, ore-forming fluid sources, enrichment mechanisms, mineralization age, and genetic type [29,31,35,36,41,42]. However, due to limitations in suitable testing objects and methods, there remains significant controversy regarding the mineralization age of the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The primary differing viewpoints focus on mineralization occurring during the Indosinian Period [29,36] and the Yanshanian Period [29], which has hindered a comprehensive understanding of the deposit’s metallogenic regularity. In recent years, during the exploration of the Yanlinsi gold deposit in northeastern Hunan, the authors discovered northwest-trending diabase dikes in both drill holes and mine workings, which cut through the northeast-trending gold veins. Therefore, on the basis of detailed field investigations, this study systematically conducted petrological, elemental geochemical, and zircon U-Pb chronological analyses on the diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area to reveal the nature of its magmatic source and the tectonic setting of its formation. Meanwhile, LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating was performed on hydrothermal zircon grains from auriferous quartz veins. Combined with the cross-cutting relationship between diabase dikes and auriferous quartz veins, the mineralization age of the deposit was determined. This study holds significant importance for in-depth understanding of the geochemical properties of the deep mantle source and deep lithospheric information in northeastern Hunan Province.
Figure 1. (a). Sketch map showing tectonic units of the Jiangnan orogenic belt, Modified after [43]. (b). Simplified geological map of the Yanlinsi Au ore prospect. Abbreviations: LTPT—Longtoupu Town; FXS—Fengxi Street; NYQV—Nanyangqiao Village; XGT—Xiangeng Town; MZV—Mingzhao Village; WLDV—Wulidun Village; BGT—Baiguan Town; HXQ—Hongxiaqiao Rock Mass; XJV—Xianjin Village; ZT—Zhentou; GQT—Guanqiao Town; GQ—Guanqiao; DGC—Daguanchong; BHL—Baohualing; GZT—Guanzhuang Town; CL—Changlian; BSP—Banshanpu Rock Mass; YJBV—Yaojiaba Village; XXT—Xianxia Town; HLZT—Huanglanzui Town; BSV—Banshan Village; LSR—Lushui River; JJ—Jinji; XHJ—Xiaohengjiang; PJT—Puji Town; YHR—Yanghe River; CCT—Chengchong Town; HJC—Hengjiangchong; LSP—Lishupo; TSB—Tuanshanbei; ZC—zhengchong; YLS—Yanlinsi; BBS—Banbianshan; XHT—Xianghetian; DYC—Dayuanchong; QC—Qincao; SJAF—Shuangjiangao Fracture; YHV—Yanghua Village; DYZ—Dayao Town; JGT—jingang Town; NQT—Nanqiao Town; FLT—Fuli Town; BTTT—Baitutan Town; PKT—Pukou Town; WX—Wangxian; DBV—Dongbao Village; HD-LLF—Hengdong-Liling Fracture; WFT—Wangfang Town. 1. Cretaceous–Quaternary; 2. Upper Triassic–Upper Jurassic; 3. Middle Devonian–Lower Triassic; 4. Banxi group; 5. Dayaogu Formation; 6. Xiaomuping Formation; 7. Huanghudong Formation; 8. Leishenmiao Formation; 9. Panjiachong Formation; 10. Yijiaqiao Formation; 11. Silurian tonalite; 12. Silurian granodiorite; 13. Silurian monzogranite; 14. Granitic porphyry dikes (plutons); 15. Diabase dikes; 16. Hornfelsed alteration zone; 17. Geological boundary; 18. Unconformity geological boundary; 19. Thrust fault and its attitude; 20. Faults with uncertain nature, inferred faults; 21. Inferred concealed rock mass; 22. Lode gold deposits; 23. Placer gold deposits.
Figure 1. (a). Sketch map showing tectonic units of the Jiangnan orogenic belt, Modified after [43]. (b). Simplified geological map of the Yanlinsi Au ore prospect. Abbreviations: LTPT—Longtoupu Town; FXS—Fengxi Street; NYQV—Nanyangqiao Village; XGT—Xiangeng Town; MZV—Mingzhao Village; WLDV—Wulidun Village; BGT—Baiguan Town; HXQ—Hongxiaqiao Rock Mass; XJV—Xianjin Village; ZT—Zhentou; GQT—Guanqiao Town; GQ—Guanqiao; DGC—Daguanchong; BHL—Baohualing; GZT—Guanzhuang Town; CL—Changlian; BSP—Banshanpu Rock Mass; YJBV—Yaojiaba Village; XXT—Xianxia Town; HLZT—Huanglanzui Town; BSV—Banshan Village; LSR—Lushui River; JJ—Jinji; XHJ—Xiaohengjiang; PJT—Puji Town; YHR—Yanghe River; CCT—Chengchong Town; HJC—Hengjiangchong; LSP—Lishupo; TSB—Tuanshanbei; ZC—zhengchong; YLS—Yanlinsi; BBS—Banbianshan; XHT—Xianghetian; DYC—Dayuanchong; QC—Qincao; SJAF—Shuangjiangao Fracture; YHV—Yanghua Village; DYZ—Dayao Town; JGT—jingang Town; NQT—Nanqiao Town; FLT—Fuli Town; BTTT—Baitutan Town; PKT—Pukou Town; WX—Wangxian; DBV—Dongbao Village; HD-LLF—Hengdong-Liling Fracture; WFT—Wangfang Town. 1. Cretaceous–Quaternary; 2. Upper Triassic–Upper Jurassic; 3. Middle Devonian–Lower Triassic; 4. Banxi group; 5. Dayaogu Formation; 6. Xiaomuping Formation; 7. Huanghudong Formation; 8. Leishenmiao Formation; 9. Panjiachong Formation; 10. Yijiaqiao Formation; 11. Silurian tonalite; 12. Silurian granodiorite; 13. Silurian monzogranite; 14. Granitic porphyry dikes (plutons); 15. Diabase dikes; 16. Hornfelsed alteration zone; 17. Geological boundary; 18. Unconformity geological boundary; 19. Thrust fault and its attitude; 20. Faults with uncertain nature, inferred faults; 21. Inferred concealed rock mass; 22. Lode gold deposits; 23. Placer gold deposits.
Minerals 15 01190 g001

2. Regional Geology and Ore Deposit Geological Features

The Yanlinsi gold deposit is located in the Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang area in the southern part of northeastern Hunan Province (Figure 1b). The strata exposed in the region are dominated by the neoproterozoic Lengjiaxi group, which accounts for nearly 70% of the total area of the region, followed by the neoproterozoic Banxi group, Devonian system, Carboniferous system, Permian system, Triassic system, Cretaceous system, and Quaternary system. Among them, the Lengjiaxi group consists of a set of shallowly metamorphosed flysch turbidite deposits—abyssal facies clastic rocks intercalated with pyroclastic rock deposits. It constitutes the regional folded basement and serves as the main ore-hosting horizon for gold deposits in the region, with an Au content several to dozens of times the average value of the upper continental crust [44,45]. The neoproterozoic Banxi group is composed of a set of regionally shallowly metamorphosed greywackes and sandy-argillaceous rock deposits; the strata from the late Paleozoic to Mesozoic are mainly composed of terrestrial, marine, and marine-continental transitional facies sedimentary rocks such as shales, sandstones, siltstones, limestones, and dolomites.
The regional structure takes the Jiangnan orogenic belt as its basic framework, with the main structural trend being northeast-north-northeast. It is dominated by a series of composite anticlines (with cores composed of neoproterozoic Lengjiaxi group epimetamorphic rocks) and multiple northeast-north-northeast trending faults. In local sections, northwest-trending faults are superimposed on the northeast-north-northeast structural framework [46,47,48].
Magmatic activity in the region is frequent and intense, encompassing not only large-scale Banashipu and Hongxiaqiao granitoid intrusions in the southern part but also numerous basic-acid dikes, granitic porphyry intrusions (the Wangxian intrusion), and granodiorite stocks (the Tuanshanbei intrusion). The rock types of the Banashipu and Hongxiaqiao intrusions are mainly monzogranite, granodiorite, and tonalite, with diagenetic age concentrated in the range of 434–421 Ma. These intrusions formed during the extensional relaxation stage in the late phase of Early Paleozoic intracontinental orogeny in South China [18,19].
The sedimentary strata exposed in the Yanlinsi gold mining area are mainly the Huangxudong formation of the Neoproterozoic Lengjiaxi group. On the basis of lithological associations and sedimentary cycles, it is divided into three lithological members from bottom to top: Lower member (Pt3h1): The main rocks are grayish-green to grayish-black tuffaceous sandstones, sandy slates or slates, which constitute the core of the Yanshan thrust overturned anticline. Middle member (Pt3h2): The main rocks are light-colored shallowly metamorphosed sandstones, silty slates, or slates, distributed on both sides of the overturned anticline core. Upper member (Pt3h3): The main rocks are dark grayish-green to grayish-black shallowly metamorphosed siltstones, silty slates, slates, and phyllites, distributed in the northwest and southeast of the mining area. All three lithological members serve as ore-hosting strata. The main ore vein zone I is hosted in the Lower and Middle members; vein zones II and III are hosted in the Lower member of the northwest limb of the overturned anticline; and vein zone IV is hosted in the Middle and Upper members of the southeast limb of the overturned anticline (Figure 2).
The main structures in the mining area are the Yanshan thrust overturned anticline and the northeast-trending ductile shear zone. The Yanshan thrust overturned anticline is a secondary structure of the regional Jianganshan overturned composite anticline, with a length exceeding 2000 m, an axial direction of north-northeast-northeast, and an axial plane dipping northwest (290°–320°) at an angle of 30°–62°. Its southeast limb is the overturned limb, while the northwest limb is the normal limb. Cleavage zones parallel to the fold axial plane and interlayer fracture zones nearly parallel to the strata are developed in both limbs; these cleavage zones and interlayer fracture zones serve as the ore-hosting structures for gold orebodies in the mining area (Figure 2). Northeast-trending ductile shear zone: ductile deformation is superimposed on the early brittle structures of the mining area, forming an inherited fault with multiple activity features. It consists of a series of small-scale northeast-trending brittle-ductile shear zones that constitute a large-scale shear zone, and the gold orebodies themselves exhibit ductile shear deformation features. The shear zone extends over 1 km along its strike, with an attitude of 310°–330° ∠ 47°–61°. A large number of macroscopic indicators of ductile deformation are developed within the shear zone, forming kink structures of quartz veins, composite vein folds, strong compressive schistosity zones, and ptygmatic structures; locally, horsetail structures, lenticular structures, and asymmetric folds formed by ductile deformation can be observed. The slates within the shear zone undergo extensive deformation and intense rock alteration, showing (proto-) mylonitization features. In addition, northwest-trending faults are developed in the mining area and belong to the second phase of faults in the area. These faults are small in scale, have short strike extensions, and dip northeast or southwest. Diabase dikes and quartz veins are often developed in the northwest-trending fault zones and cut through the northeast-trending gold veins (orebodies).
No obvious magmatic activity is observed on the surface of the mining area; however, geological information revealed by drill holes and adits indicates the presence of concealed basic dikes in the area, with diabase as the main rock. According to underground investigations, the diabase occurs in a dike-like form with branching and merging phenomena. The dike width varies from 0.5 to 10 m, with an overall strike of approximately 310°, dipping northeast, and a dip angle generally ranging from 65° to 75° (nearly vertical in local sections), and the strike extension exceeds 200 m. Observations in drill holes and mines show that the diabase dikes intrude into the Lengjiaxi Group and cut through the northeast-trending gold veins (Figure 3). The diabase is generally grayish-black in color, with a massive structure and a diabasic texture (Figure 4e,f). It consists of plagioclase, pyroxene, carbonate, and a small amount of magnetite, with occasional minor pyrite and chalcopyrite (Figure 4g,j–l). Plagioclase mostly occurs as subhedral to euhedral prisms; twinning is mostly indiscernible, with only local polysynthetic twins visible, and most of it has undergone carbonation and chloritization alteration. Pyroxene mainly occurs as anhedral grains, appearing dark brown under plane-polarized light, and fills the triangular interstices formed by relatively euhedral plagioclase, presenting a diabasic texture (Figure 4g,j).
The wall-rock alteration of the deposit is extensively developed; centered on the gold orebody, a distinct alteration zone is generally formed within a range of 0.5–3.0 m on either side. All-rock alteration of the deposit is well-developed: centered on the gold orebody, a distinct alteration zone is formed within a range of generally 0.5–3.0 m on both sides. The main types of wall-rock alteration include sericitization, carbonatization, pyritization, and arsenopyritization; no obvious superimposed or secondary alteration phenomena are observed. Pyrite and arsenopyrite in the altered wall rocks generally have larger grain sizes and well-developed crystal forms, which is different from the fine-grained, xenomorphic-hypidiomorphic pyrite and arsenopyrite in the gold orebody.
The gold orebodies in the mining area are mainly concentrated in the core and northwest limb (normal limb) of the Yanshan thrust overturned anticline. A total of 75 gold orebodies have been discovered; among these, three of the main ore bodies have relatively simple morphologies, and their attitudes are basically consistent with those of the country rocks. Most of them are stratabound orebodies, presenting stratoid or layered shapes; some orebodies have a dip extension larger than the strike extension, showing a podiform shape. Within the mining area, the ore (mineralized) bodies can be divided into four groups of vein zones in plane view, among which vein zone I is the main vein zone (Figure 2); it strikes 35°–55°, dips northwest with a dip angle of 30°–60°, generally has a length ranging from several tens of meters to over 900 m, a thickness of 0.67–6.68 m, and a grade of 0.52–51.62 g/t. In addition, a very small number of orebodies (V4, V26) occur in northwest-trending fractures (Figure 2). According to the actual mining data of the area, the northwest-trending ore veins have short extensions and large grade variations, and basically have no mining value.
Ore types can be divided into two categories—banded quartz vein type and altered rock type—on the basis of differences in ore texture—structural features, mineral assemblages, and ore-hosting rocks (Figure 4a–c). The banded quartz veins vary in thickness from 0.02 to 0.30 m, with relatively regular shapes and clear boundaries with the surrounding rocks. The quartz veins are white in color, and dark gray bands are well-developed inside them, mainly composed of minerals such as sericite, fine-grained pyrite, arsenopyrite, subordinate amounts of chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, and native gold (Figure 4g–i). The altered rock type occurs on both sides of the banded quartz veins, with a thickness of approximately 0.4 m on a single side. It is characterized by “bleaching” alterations such as sericitization, carbonation, and silicification. The metallic minerals are mainly pyrite and arsenopyrite, distributed in a sparse disseminated manner, with a gold grade generally ranging from 0.63 to 1.90 g/t.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The diabase samples in this study were collected from the drift of the 115th middle level in the mining area. To exclude and minimize the impact of mineralization and alteration on the sample analysis results, all samples in this study were collected from diabase dikes with large widths, and the sampling sites were far from the edges of the diabase dikes.
Samples for hydrothermal zircon research were collected from the main orebody V11 in the 115th middle level of the mining area. The collected samples are quartz vein-type ores, mainly composed of quartz, pyrite, and arsenopyrite. Quartz accounts for more than 90% of the total composition, with a large grain size variation ranging from 0.01 to 2 mm. The ores also contain small amounts of sericite, galena, sphalerite, and native gold.

3.2. Methods

On the basis of detailed petrological studies, fresh samples without late-stage metasomatic vein intrusion were selected, cleaned, and air-dried. Samples for zircon separation were crushed to 80–120 mesh; zircon grains were separated via electromagnetic method and finally purified under a binocular microscope. For major element analysis, samples were comminuted to 200 mesh in a vibratory crusher use an agate mortar tray, while samples for trace element analysis were crushed to below 200 mesh.
The separation of single zircon minerals, mounting of samples, and cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging for the study samples were completed at Guangzhou Tuoyan Testing Technology Co., Ltd. in Guangzhou, China. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating was carried out at the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences. Zircon age determination adopted the laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analytical technique, which coupled a laser ablation system (Geolas2005) with an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (Agilent7500a). The Geolas2005 equipment was manufactured by Coherent Lambda Physik GmbH (formerly Lambda Physik AG) in Göttingen, Germany, and the country of purchase is Germany. The Agilent 7500a equipment was manufactured by Agilent Technologies Inc. in Tokyo, Japan, and the country of purchase is Japan. The laser ablation parameters were as follows: spot size of 32 μm, ablation depth of 20–40 μm, pulse frequency of 10 Hz, and laser energy of 110 mJ. The zircon standard 91500 was used as an external standard for isotopic fractionation correction, and detailed instrument operating conditions and testing procedures referred to relevant detailed descriptions [49,50]. Offline processing of the analytical data was performed using ICPMSDataCal software, Version 11.8. The error of individual dating isotopic age was 1σ, and the weighted mean age had a confidence level of 95%.
The major oxides and trace elements analyses of diabase were conducted at Guangzhou ALS Analytical Testing Co., Ltd in Guangzhou, China. The instrument for major element analysis of rocks was the PANalytical PW2424, The PANalytical PW2424 equipment was manufactured by PANalytical B.V. in Almelo, The Netherlands, and the country of purchase is The Netherlands. adopting the ME-XRF26 X-ray fluorescence spectrometry fusion method. Two samples were weighed: one sample (0.66 g) was mixed thoroughly with a flux of 4% lithium tetraborate-lithium metaborate (66:34), followed by high-temperature fusion. The molten product was poured into a platinum mold to form a flat glass slide, which was then analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Meanwhile, the other sample (1.0 g) was placed in a muffle furnace and calcined at 1000 °C. After cooling, it was weighed, and the weight difference of the sample before and after heating was the loss on ignition (LOI). The sum of the LOI result and the oxide results of elements determined by XRF is the “total” sum of this method, with the detailed determination process referring to the national standard GB/T 14506.31-2019 [51]. Ferrous oxide (FeO) was tested by the Fe-VOL05 titration method: the sample was decomposed with hydrofluoric acid-sulfuric acid, the remaining fluorine in the solution was complexed with boric acid, and sodium diphenylamine sulfonate was used as an indicator to titrate the content of ferrous iron (Fe2+) with a standard potassium dichromate solution, followed by calculating the amount of FeO. The instrumentation for trace and rare earth element analyses comprised the Agilent 7900, The Agilent 7900 equipment was manufactured by Agilent Technologies Inc. in Santa Clara, CA, USA, and the country of purchase is Singapore, adopting the ME-MS61r four-acid digestion inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and ME-MS81g fusion inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively. The detailed determination process refers to the national standard GB/T 14506.30-2010 [52]. For the ME-MS61r method: The sample was digested with perchloric acid, nitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, and hydrochloric acid, volumetrically adjusted with dilute hydrochloric acid, and then analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES); if the contents of Bi/Hg/Mo/Ag/W are high, appropriate dilution is required before analysis by ICP-MS. For the ME-MS81g method: Lithium borate (LiBO2/Li2B4O7) flux was added to the sample, mixed uniformly, and fused in a furnace at 1025 °C. After the molten liquid cooled, it was digested with nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and hydrofluoric acid, volumetrically adjusted, and then analyzed by ICP-MS. The relative deviation (RD) for analytical precision control is <10% for ME-MS61r, and <5% for both XRF and LOI in ME-XRF26.

4. Results

4.1. Zircon U-Pb Age of Diabase

In this study, 31 zircon grains selected from sample 115CM3-1 were tested, and the ages of 24 zircon grains with high concordance were analyzed. Zircon grains from the Yanlinsi diabase dike are long prismatic, short prismatic, or irregular in shape, with particle sizes ranging from 40 to 160 μm and length–width ratios of 1:1 to 3:1. In cathodoluminescence (CL) images, most zircon grains appear dark gray; most exhibit obvious rhythmic compositional zoning, while some show uniform streaky absorption (Figure 5). The Th/U ratios of the zircon grains range from 0.15 to 0.78, with an average of 0.43 (Table 1), indicating that they are magmatic zircon grains or captured zircon grains of magmatic origin [53]. The zircon chronological data results for the sample show that among the 24 analysis spots, 20 spots yield a 206Pb/238U age that lies on or near the concordia line in the zircon U-Pb concordia diagram. The calculated concordia age is 219.5 ± 1.7 Ma (MSWD = 1.10, n = 20), which is basically consistent with the weighted mean age of 218.3 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD = 1.00, n = 20). This consistency indicates that the isotopic system of the zircon grains has remained essentially closed since their formation, representing the crystallization age of the magma (Figure 6). The remaining 4 analysis spots have significantly older and scattered ages, with 207Pb/235U age ranging from 2327 to 1263 Ma, and are inferred to be xenocrystic zircon grains derived from the basement.

4.2. U-Pb Age of Hydrothermal Zircon Grains in Quartz Veins

In this study, 30 zircon grains separated from sample YLS-CM1-4 were tested, and the ages of 21 zircon grains with high concordance were obtained. Among these, the analytical spots No. 3, 8, 10, and 19 deviated significantly from the concordia line and discordia line of zircon grains, so they were not included in the zircon age calculation. The 207Pb/235U ages of spots No. 2, 5, 25, and 26 ranged from 797 to 892 Ma, basically consistent with the peak age of zircon grains in the Lengjiaxi Group clastic rocks in the study area; these zircon grains are inferred to be captured detrital zircon grains. The 207Pb/235U ages of spots No. 9, 13, and 14, which are presumably xenocrystic zircon grains derived from the basement, ranged from 1557 to 2216 Ma. The remaining 10 zircon grains are mostly short prismatic, granular, or irregular in shape, with particle sizes ranging from 30 to 80 μm and length–width ratios of 1:1 to 2:1 (Figure 7). In cathodoluminescence (CL) images, the zircon grains are mostly grayish-white to dark gray; the CL images show oscillatory zoning of whole grains or weak zoning in their interiors, and some have irregular luminescent areas and white altered rims, exhibiting typical hydrothermal zircon features [54,55,56]. Zircon chronological data results for the sample show that the 206Pb/238U ages of 10 analytical spots all lie on or near the concordia line in the zircon U-Pb concordia diagram, with apparent 206Pb/238U ages ranging from 397 to 438 Ma (Table 1). The calculated weighted mean age was 421.9 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD = 8.4, n = 10), indicating that the isotopic system of the zircon grains has remained essentially closed since their formation, representing the formation age of the hydrothermal zircon grains (Figure 8).

4.3. Whole-Rock Geochemistry

The analysis results for major, trace, and rare earth elements in 12 diabase samples show that the SiO2 content of the diabase samples ranges from 43.68% to 46.55%, the Al2O3 content is in the range of 13.88% to 15.16%, the MgO content varies between 7.78% and 9.84%, and the Mg# values are relatively concentrated, ranging from 65.0 to 68.7%. The total alkali (Na2O + K2O) content ranges from 3.42% to 4.15% (Table 2). The loss on ignition (LOI) of the samples is between 4.54% and 9.85%, with an average of 6.27%, indicating that the rocks have undergone a certain degree of hydrothermal alteration after their formation. Considering that the rocks have a certain degree of alteration, elements that are immobile during metamorphism and alteration can be used to indicate the geochemical features of the diabase samples. In the Nb/Y-Zr/TiO2 diagram, all sample points fall into the alkaline basalt area (Figure 9a); in the SiO2-K2O diagram, all sample points fall near the boundary between the high-K calc-alkaline series and the shoshonitic series (Figure 9b).
In the primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagram, all diabase samples show a highly consistent variation trend, characterized by enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs) such as Rb, Ba, K, and Sr, and relatively weak depletion in high field strength elements (HFSEs) such as Nb, Ta, and P. Overall, these features are similar to those of intraplate ocean island basalts (OIB) (Figure 10a). The total rare earth element (ΣREE) contents of the diabase samples are relatively low, ranging from 133.09 × 10−6 to 174.33 × 10−6. The LREE/HREE ratios are 8.95–11.37, and the (La/Yb)n ratios are 11.21–14.82, indicating significant fractionation between light and heavy rare earth elements. The REE distribution patterns are right-inclined, with LREE enrichment, which is also similar to the features of intraplate OIB (Figure 10b). The δEu values range from 1.01 to 1.11, and the δCe values range from 0.98 to 1.12, showing no obvious anomalies. This suggests that plagioclase fractional crystallization was not significant during magma evolution.

5. Discussion

5.1. Age of Diagenesis

In this study, high-precision laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) was used for zircon U-Pb dating of diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area. The 206Pb/238U ages of 20 analytical spots all lie on or near the concordia line in the zircon U-Pb concordia diagram. The calculated concordia age is 219.5 ± 1.7 Ma (MSWD = 1.10, n = 20) (Figure 6a), which is essentially consistent with the weighted mean age of 218.3 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD = 1.00, n = 20) (Figure 6b). Cathodoluminescence (CL) images (Figure 5) show that most zircon grains are dark gray, with clearly visible rhythmic compositional zoning, and some exhibit uniform streaky absorption, indicating that these zircon grains crystallized from the diabase magma. The remaining four analytical spots have significantly older and scattered ages, which are interpreted as those of zircon grains captured from the basement during the emplacement of the diabase. Therefore, the age of (219.5 ± 1.7) Ma is determined as the diagenetic age of the diabase dike, corresponding to the Indosinian period. This age is generally consistent with the whole-rock K-Ar age of 238.4 Ma for the diabase dike intruding into the Banashipu intrusion in the region. Previous zircon U-Pb dating results for magmatic activities that mainly formed large acidic intrusions in the Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang area are concentrated in the range of 430–420 Ma [8,18,19,60]. In recent years, reports on Indosinian magmatic activities in the Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang area, such as the zircon U-Pb age of 224.7 ± 4.4 Ma for the Wangxian granodiorite porphyry stock [22] and the zircon U-Pb age of 225.2 ± 1.9 Ma for the diabase dike in the Tuanshanbei gold mining area [27], further confirm that in addition to the Caledonian magmatic activities, there were also Indosinian magmatic activities in the region that mainly formed intermediate-basic stocks and dikes.

5.2. Crustal Contamination and Fractional Crystallization

Assessing fractional crystallization and crustal contamination is a critical prerequisite for investigating the features of a rock’s source region. The diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area exhibits high Mg# values (65.0–68.7, average 67.0), high TiO2 contents (1.52%–1.84%, average 1.61%), and low SiO2 contents (43.68%–46.55%, average 45.44%), suggesting that the magma was derived from partial melting of the mantle [61,62]. Mantle-derived magmas formed in continental intraplate settings typically pass through the continental crust during ascent, making them susceptible to varying degrees of continental crustal material contamination. Since the continental crust is strongly depleted in Nb, Ta, and Ti [63], magmas that have undergone significant continental crustal contamination during emplacement and ascent typically acquire crustal attributes, exhibiting geochemical features similar to those of island arc magmatic rocks [64]. Trace element analysis of the Yanlinsi diabase shows relatively weak negative anomalies of Nb and Ta (Figure 10a), suggesting that the magma may have experienced minor contamination by continental crustal materials. Additionally, the presence of Proterozoic captured zircon grains (2327–1263 Ma) in the zircon U-Pb dating of the diabase samples further indicates that the magma was contaminated by country rocks during its ascent and emplacement. However, the Nb/Ta ratios of the diabase samples range from 16.24 to 19.00 (average 17.75), Zr/Hf ratios from 40.29 to 46.36 (average 43.74), and Nb/U ratios from 37.3 to 42.44 (average 40.4). These ratios are significantly higher than those of the continental crust (Nb/Ta = 11, Zr/Hf = 33, Nb/U = 6.15), indicating that the influence of crustal contamination on the diabase magma was insignificant [63,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Furthermore, compared to mantle-derived materials, the continental crust is characterized by lower Nb, lower Nb/U ratios, enriched LREEs, and higher La/Nb ratios [72]. If the Yanlinsi diabase had undergone significant crustal contamination, positive correlations would be expected in the La/Nb-Ba/Nb and Nb/U-Nb diagrams. However, no obvious correlations are observed in these diagrams (Figure 11a,b), and the sample data points mostly plot within or near the OIB field, with higher Nb contents and Nb/U ratios than the crust and far from crustal data points. This also indicates that contamination by continental crustal materials had little impact on the high field strength elements in the basic dike magma of the Yanlinsi mining area.
The Mg# values for diabase samples from the Yanlinsi gold mining area are relatively high and concentrated, ranging from 65.0 to 68.7 with an average of 67.0, which is comparable to the Mg# values for primitive magma (63–73; [73]). This indicates that the magma did not undergo significant fractional crystallization. Meanwhile, the contents of Cr (290–400 × 10−6) and Ni (163–257 × 10−6) in the diabase samples are lower than those in the initial magma (Cr > 400 × 10−6 [74], Ni = 300 × 10−6~400 × 10−6 [75]), suggesting that the diabase may have experienced minor fractional crystallization of ferromagnesian minerals (such as olivine and pyroxene) during its formation. There is an overall positive correlation between Al2O3 and SiO2 (Figure 12a), indicating that there may be fractional crystallization of felsic minerals. The Co content is relatively high and shows a positive correlation with MgO content (Figure 12d). Additionally, SiO2, Ni, and Cr contents are positively correlated with MgO content (Figure 12b,e,f), implying that fractional crystallization of olivine and clinopyroxene occurred during magma evolution [76,77]. The weak depletion of P in the trace element spider diagram (Figure 10a) suggests that low-degree apatite fractional crystallization may have also occurred during magma evolution [78]. MgO and TiO2 show a significant negative correlation (Figure 12c), indicating that Ti-bearing minerals (such as rutile, ilmenite, and sphene) were not the main crystallizing phases. Meanwhile, there are no obvious Eu anomalies in the REE distribution patterns (δEu = 1.01–1.11) (Figure 10b), indicating the absence of significant plagioclase fractional crystallization [79].

5.3. Nature of the Source Region

As analyzed above, the diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area is characterized by low silica (average SiO2 = 45.44%), high magnesium (average MgO = 9.44%), high titanium (average TiO2 = 1.61%), and high Mg# values (average = 67.0). Meanwhile, both the trace element spider diagram and rare earth element distribution pattern (Figure 10a,b) show that the Yanlinsi diabase has elemental features similar to those of ocean island basalts (OIBs), suggesting that the diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area may have been generated by the melting of an enriched mantle.
Certain trace element ratios remain unaffected by partial melting and fractional crystallization, making them reliable tracers for identifying the nature of magma source regions [80]. The average Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf ratios of the diabase samples are 17.75 and 43.74, respectively, which are very close to the primitive mantle values (17.8 and 37; [81]). This similarity suggests that the magma was derived from the partial melting of mantle peridotite with a composition similar to primitive mantle. Parameters of the Yanlinsi diabase, such as Zr/Nb (4.0–4.8), La/Nb (0.93–1.07), Th/Nb (0.13–0.16), and Th/La (0.13–0.16), all fall within the range of EM II-type OIB [71,82]. In the Nb/Yb–Ta/Yb diagram (Figure 13a) and Nb/Yb–La/Yb diagram (Figure 13b), the diabase samples plot within the mantle array and are concentrated near ocean island basalts (OIBs), further indicating that the diabase magma in the Yanlinsi mining area was generated by the melting of an enriched mantle.
Ratios such as Sm/Yb, Ce/Y, and Zr/Nb are less affected by magma fractional crystallization, making them useful for determining the nature of the source region and the degree of partial melting [84,85]. In the Zr/Nb–Ce/Y diagram (Figure 14a), all diabase samples from the Yanlinsi mining area plot between primitive garnet-facies lherzolite and primitive spinel-facies lherzolite, with a very narrow range of variation. In the Sm/Yb–Sm diagram (Figure 14b), the values of the diabase samples are all close to or slightly higher than the partial melting line of spinel-garnet (1:1) lherzolite, indicating that the mantle source region is spinel-garnet lherzolite, with a partial melting degree of 10%–15%.
On the basis of the above features, this study concludes that the diabase magma in the Yanlinsi mining area was formed by the partial melting of an enriched mantle (EM II). The source region is composed of spinel-garnet (1:1) lherzolite, with a partial melting degree of 10%–15%.

5.4. Tectonic Setting

Magmatic processes such as fractional crystallization and partial melting have minimal effects on incompatible elements like Zr, Y, Nb, and Ti [88,89]. Therefore, these trace elements can be used to determine the tectonic setting of basaltic magma formation. In the Zr-Zr/Y diagram (Figure 15a), all diabase samples from the Yanlinsi mining area plot within or near the within-plate basalt (WPB) field. In the 2Nb-Zr/4-Y diagram (Figure 15b), the samples project into the within-plate alkaline basalt field. In the Ti/100-Zr-Y×3 diagram (Figure 15c), they all fall within the within-plate basalt field. In the Ta/Hf-Th/Hf diagram (Figure 15d), the samples project into the continental rift alkaline basalt field. Overall, the diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area primarily exhibits a within-plate tectonic setting similar to that of ocean island basalts (OIBs).
Previous studies have shown that during the Indosinian tectonic movement, the Paleo-Tethys Ocean closed and disappeared, leading to intracontinental collision orogeny among multiple blocks around South China [5,92,93,94,95]. Within this tectonic framework, the South China Block experienced various tectonic environments during the Indosinian period, including crustal stacking, thickening, and thermal-stress relaxation. The early stage (251–228 Ma) was characterized by syn-collisional compression, while the late stage (228–199 Ma) saw a local transition to an extensional environment, triggering stratigraphic unconformities, rock metamorphism and deformation, large-scale granitic magmatism, and minor basic magmatism in the South China Block. Indosinian granitic magmatism in the South China Block can be divided into an early stage (243–233 Ma) and a late stage (224–204 Ma) [96]. Specifically, in Hunan Province, early Indosinian magmatism is not prominent, with late Indosinian granites being the main representatives [97], such as the Yajiangqiao intrusion in eastern Hunan (213–212 Ma) [98], the Wangxian intrusion in eastern Hunan (224.7 Ma) [22], the Xitian A-type granite in eastern Hunan (221 Ma) [99], the Ziyunshan intrusion in central Hunan (223.2 Ma) [100], the Weishan intrusion in central Hunan (215.7 Ma) [101], the Miaoershan intrusion in southwestern Hunan (214 Ma) [102], and the Yuechengling intrusion (219–215 Ma) [103,104]. In terms of basic magmatism, apart from the LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age of 219.5 ± 1.7 Ma for the diabase dikes in the Yanlinsi mining area in this study, other basic magmatic rocks have been discovered in Hunan Province, including the alkaline basalts from Baoanwei, Zhongxinpu, and Lizhaixiang in Ningyuan (205.5 Ma and 212.3 Ma) [105], basic rock inclusions from Huziyan in Daoxian (220–233 Ma) [106], the Changchengling diabase in Yizhang (227 Ma) [107], the Jiangshiqiao diabase in Taojiang (229.9 Ma) [108], and the Tuanshanbei diabase in northeastern Hunan (225 Ma) [27]. The occurrence of A-type granites and basic magmatism both indicate that the South China Block entered a local extensional environment in the late Indosinian period. Thus, the diabase in the Yanlinsi mining area should have formed in an extensional tectonic setting after intracontinental collision orogeny in the late Indosinian period, which is consistent with the aforementioned petrogeochemical analysis results.

5.5. Geological Significance

The Guanzhuang gold ore concentration area in Liuyang-Liling, northeastern Hunan, is located in the southern part of the eastern segment of the Jiangnan Uplift metallogenic belt. Within this area, there are a series of small to medium-sized gold deposits (occurrences), including Yanlinsi, Tuanshanbei, Zhengchong, Hongyuan, Lishupo, and Qingcao. On the basis of the types of ore-hosting structures, the gold veins in the area are mainly divided into two groups: northeast-trending and northwest-trending. Northeast-trending veins: The ore-hosting structures are (sub-)bedding ductile shear zones and (interlayer) faults. In some local areas, they may be superimposed by later structures, resulting in a northwest strike (e.g., Jinhong gold deposit). The mineralization is mainly of the types of (banded) quartz veins and altered rocks, like the representative deposits including Yanlinsi and Tuanshanbei. Northwest-trending veins: They are mainly controlled by northwest-trending faults (including ductile shear zones) or fractures, cutting through the northeast-trending veins (ore bodies) or being restricted by northeast-trending ore-hosting faults and developing in their hanging walls. The mineralization type is mainly structural fracture zone type [31,109], with typical deposits including Zhengchong and Qingcao. In recent years, some scholars have studied the metallogenic age of gold deposits in the area. Peng Bo and Liu Xiang [38] obtained an Rb-Sr isochron age of 236 ± 14 Ma for the Qingcao gold deposit, which belongs to the Indosinian period. Han Fengbin et al. [11] obtained an Rb-Sr isochron age of 222.4 ± 9.4 Ma for the Tuanshanbei gold deposit, also belonging to the Indosinian period. Huang Cheng et al. [29] obtained the ESR age of quartz from the Yanlinsi gold deposit as 214.2 Ma (for northeast-trending ore veins) and 177.4–155.0 Ma (for northwest-trending ore veins), suggesting that the deposit formed during the Indosinian and Yanshanian periods. Zhang et al. [36] obtained the sericite Rb-Sr age of 216.9 ± 7.8 Ma for the Yanlinsi gold deposit, as well as the rutile U-Pb age of 415.2 ± 8.3 Ma and sericite Rb-Sr age of 417.6 ± 12.9 Ma for the Tuanshanbei gold deposit. Due to the limitations of various isotopic dating methods, there have been significant controversies regarding the mineralization age of gold deposits in the region, which has hampered an improved understanding on the gold mineralization regularity in the area. As mentioned earlier, the Yanlinsi gold deposit is a representative quartz-vein type gold deposit in the Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang area. The gold ore veins occur in the Huangxudong Formation of the Lengjiaxi Group, with most orebodies striking 35°–55°, dipping northwest, and having a dip angle of 30°–60°. In this study, the northwest-trending diabase dikes discovered in the Yanlinsi mine were found to cut the northeast-trending banded gold-bearing quartz veins (gold orebodies) (Figure 3), and their zircon U-Pb age is 219.5 ± 1.7 Ma, indicating that the formation of the Yanlinsi gold deposit is no later than 220 Ma. Meanwhile, the authors obtained the LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age of hydrothermal zircon from quartz in the main mineralization stage of the Yanlinsi gold deposit as 421.9 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD = 8.4, n = 10) (Figure 8), indicating that the main mineralization stage of the deposit formed during the Caledonian period, which is consistent with the mineralization age constrained by the cross-cutting relationship with diabase.

6. Conclusions

(1) The LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon age of diabase in the Yanlinsi gold mining area is 219.5 ± 1.7 Ma, indicating that it formed in the late Indosinian period.
(2) Overall, the diabase in the Yanlinsi gold mining area is characterized by low SiO2, high MgO, and high Mg# values, with trace and rare earth element distribution patterns generally similar to those of ocean island basalt (OIB).
(3) The whole-rock geochemistry characteristics of the diabase in the Yanlinsi gold mining area indicate that its source area is spinel-garnet lherzolite in the enriched mantle (EM II), with a partial melting degree of 10%–15%. It has weak assimilation and contamination with continental crust materials, and weak fractional crystallization of olivine, clinopyroxene, and apatite occurred during magmatic evolution.
(4) A comprehensive analysis of the trace element tectonic discrimination and zircon U-Pb age of the Yanlinsi diabase shows that it formed in an extensional tectonic setting after the intracontinental collision orogeny of the South China Plate in the late Indosinian period.
(5) The LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon age of hydrothermal quartz veins from the main metallogenic stage in the Yanlinsi gold mining area is 421.9 ± 1.5 Ma. Combined with the cross-cutting relationship between basic dikes and gold veins (ore bodies), it is determined that the main metallogenic stage of the deposit formed in the Caledonian period.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.X. and C.Z.; investigation, C.Z., J.S., W.L., Z.M. and S.T.; date curation, C.Z. and W.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z.; writing—review and editing, R.X., C.Z., E.T. and J.S.; project administration, R.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Science and Technology Support Project of the New Round of Prospecting Breakthrough Action of the Ministry of Natural Resources (ZKKJ202408), the Scientific Research Projects of Hunan Institute of Geology (2021YSP-05, 201917, 201902-01), and the Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Natural Resources (2019-02).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Tan Guilin from Liling Hengshi Mining Co., Ltd. for his help in the field.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, S.G.; Sun, W.D.; Zhang, G.W.; Chen, J.Y.; Yang, Y.C. Chronology and Geochemistry of Metamorphic Volcanic Rocks in the Heigouxia Area of the Mianlue Tectonic Belt, Southern Qinling: Evidence for the Paleozoic Ocean Basin and Its Closure Time. Sci. China (Earth Sci.) 1996, 3, 223–230, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  2. Faure, M.; Shu, L.S.; Wang, B.; Charvet, J.; Choulet, F.; Monie, P. Intracontinental subduction: A possible mechanism for the Early Paleozoic Orogen of SE China. Terra Nova 2009, 21, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Charvet, J.; Shu, L.Y.; Faure, M.; Choulet, F.; Wang, B.; Lu, H.Y.; Breton, N.L. Structural development of the Lower Paleozoic belt of South China: Genesis of an intracontinental orogen. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2010, 39, 309–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.J.; Zhang, F.F.; Fan, W.M.; Zhang, G.W.; Chen, S.Y.; Cawood, P.A.; Zhang, A.M. Tectonic setting of the South China Block in the early Paleozoic: Resolving intracontinental and ocean closure models from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology. Tectonics 2010, 29, 6020–6035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, G.W.; Guo, A.L.; Wang, Y.J.; Li, S.Z.; Dong, Y.P.; Liu, S.F.; He, D.F.; Cheng, S.Y.; Lu, R.K.; Yao, A.P. Tectonics of South China continent and its implications. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2013, 56, 1804–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.L.; Zhou, J.C.; Griffin, W.; Zhao, G.C.; Yu, J.H.; Qiu, J.S.; Zhang, Y.J.; Xing, G.F. Geochemical zonation across a Neoproterozoic orogenic belt: Isotopic evidence from granitoids and metasedimentary rocks of the Jiangnan orogen, China. Precambrian Res. 2014, 242, 154–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, L.M.; Lin, S.F.; Xing, G.F.; Davis, D.W.; Jiang, Y.; Davis, W.; Zhang, Y.J. Ca. 830 Ma back-arc type volcanic rocks in the eastern part of the Jiangnan orogen: Implications for the Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of South China Block. Precambrian Res. 2016, 275, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, H.T.; Shao, Y.J.; Wang, C.; Liu, Q.Q.; Liu, Z.F.; Xiao, K.Y. Petrogenetic Mechanism of the Rock Mass in the Jinji Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2020, 41, 253–266, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, J.H.; Dong, S.W.; Cawood, P.A.; Thybo, H.; Cliftf, P.D.; Johnston, S.T.; Zhao, G.C.; Zhang, Y.Q. Cretaceous long-distance lithospheric extension and surface response in South China. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2023, 243, 104496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, W.X.; Li, X.H.; Li, Z.X.; Lou, F.S. Obduction type granites within the NE Jiangxi Ophiolite: Implications for the final amalgamation between the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks. Gondwana Res. 2008, 13, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Han, F.B.; Chang, L.; Cai, M.H.; Liu, S.Y.; Zhang, S.Q.; Chen, Y.; Peng, Z.A.; Xu, M. Mineralization Age of Gold De-posits in Northeastern Hunan: A Study. Miner. Depos. Geol. 2010, 29, 563–571, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, D.R.; Deng, T.; Chi, G.X.; Wang, Z.L.; Zou, F.H.; Zhang, J.L.; Zou, S.H. Gold mineralization in the Jiangnan Oro-genic Belt of South China: Geological, geochemical and geochronological characteristics, ore deposit-type and geo-dynamic setting. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 88, 565–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shu, L.S.; Yao, J.L.; Wang, B.; Faure, M.; Charvet, J.; Chen, Y. Neoproterozoic plate tectonic process and Phanerozoic geodynamic evolution of the South China Block. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 216, 103596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Madayipu, N.; Li, H.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Förster, M.W.; Zhou, H.X.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Q.H. Magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of long-lived Nb-Ta-(Sn) mineralization in lianyunshan, NE Hunan, South China. Bulletin 2023, 135, 2691–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Madayipu, N.; Li, H.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Ghaderi, M.; Heritier, R.s.N.n.; Hu, X.J.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Q.H. Tracing fluid exsolution and hydrothermal alteration signature of the Mufushan Nb–Ta–(Li–Be–Cs) deposit, South China: An ap-atite perspective. J. Geol. Soc. 2024, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Madayipu, N.; Li, H.; Algeo, T.J.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Zheng, H.; Liu, B.; Zhu, D.P.; Li, N.; Vincent, V.I. Fluorapatite finger-prints on magmatic-hydrothermal fluid evolution of the Lianyunshan Nb-Ta-Sn deposit, NE Hunan (South China). Chem. Geol. 2025, 678, 122669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.L.; Zhou, J.C.; Qiu, J.S.; Gao, J.F. Geochemistry of the Meso-to Neoproterozoic basic–acid rocks from Hunan Province, South China: Implications for the evolution of the western Jiangnan orogen. Precambrian Res. 2004, 135, 79–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, D.R.; Chen, G.H.; Xia, B.; Li, P.C.; He, Z.L. The Caledonian adakite-like granodiorites in Banshanpu area, eastern Hunan Province, South China: Petrogenesis and geological significance. Geol. J. China Univ. 2006, 12, 507. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guan, Y.L.; Yuan, C.; Sun, M.; Wilde, S.; Long, X.P.; Huang, X.L.; Wang, Q. I-type granitoids in the eastern Yangtze Block: Implications for the Early Paleozoic intracontinental orogeny in South China. Lithos 2014, 206, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.Q.; Shu, L.S.; Santosh, M. Petrogenesis and tectonic evolution of Lianyunshan complex, South China: Isights on Neoproterozoic and late Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the central Jiangnan Orogen. Gondwana Res. 2016, 39, 114–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ji, W.B.; Chen, Y.; Chen, K.; Wei, W.; Faure, M.; Lin, W. Multiple emplacement and exhumation history of the Late Mesozoic Dayunshan-Mufushan Batholith in Southeast China and its tectonic significance: 2. Magnetic fabrics and gravity survey. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2018, 123, 711–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, L.Z.; Wu, X.B.; Hu, B.; Li, J.; Wang, X.K. Petrological Geochemistry, Zircon U-Pb Geochronology, and Hf Isotopic Composition of the Wangxian Granodiorite Porphyry in Eastern Hunan. J. Cent. South Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2018, 49, 2280–2291, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Kong, H.; Wu, J.H.; Li, H.; Chen, S.F.; Liu, B.; Wang, G. Early Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the South China Block: Constraints from geochemistry and geochronology of granitoids in Hunan Province. Lithos 2021, 380, 105891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ou, Q.; Liu, J.Y.; Zi, F.; Carvalho, B.B.; Long, X.P.; Lai, J.Q.; Wang, K.; Jiang, Z.Q.; Liu, Y.Z.; Li, Z.L.; et al. Late Mesozoic Wangxiang Composite Granitic Pluton, South China Block: Implications to Magma Emplacement and Evolution from Geochemical Proxies. J. Earth Sci. 2025, 36, 485–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jia, D.C.; Hu, R.Z.; Xie, G.Q. Petrological Geochemistry and Tectonic Significance of Mesozoic Mafic Dikes in Northeastern Hunan. Geotecton. Metallog. 2002, 2, 179–184, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  26. Jia, D.C.; Hu, R.Z.; Lu, Y.; Xie, G.Q.; Qiu, X.L. Discovery of Sodium Lamprophyres in Northeastern Hunan and Their Geological Significance. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2003, 13, 54–58, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, C.; Sun, J.; Tan, S.M.; Lu, W.; Xiao, R.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.Q. Geochronology, Geochemistry, and Geological Significance of Diabase Dikes in the Tuanshanbei Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2023, 42, 180–197, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, L.M.; Peng, S.L.; Yang, Q.Z. Source and location mechanism for lode gold deposits hosted in metamorphic rocks in northeastern Hunan, China. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2001, 8, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, C.; Fan, G.M.; Jiang, G.L.; Luo, L.; Xu, Z.L. Structural Ore-Controlling Characteristics and ESR Dating of Gold Mineralization in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan. Geotecton. Metallog. 2012, 36, 76–84, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, Q.Q.; Shao, Y.J.; Chen, M.; Algeo, T.J.; Li, H.; Dick, J.M.; Wang, C.; Wang, W.S.; Li, Z.Q.; Liu, Z.F. Insights into the genesis of orogenic gold deposits from the Zhengchong gold field, Northeastern Hunan Province, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 105, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, W.; Sun, J.; Zhou, C.; Guo, A.M.; Peng, W. Sources of Ore-Forming Materials and Types of Ore-Forming Fluids in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2020, 41, 384–394, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun, S.C.; Zhang, L.; Li, R.H.; Wen, T.; Xu, H.; Wang, J.Y.; Li, Z.Q.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.J.; Guo, H. Process and Mechanism of Gold Mineralization at the Zhengchong Gold Deposit, Jiangnan Orogenic Belt: Evidence from the Arsenopyrite and Chlorite Mineral Thermometers. Minerals 2019, 9, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, M.; Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Wu, S. Analysis of geological characterstics and ore-controlling factors of gold deposits in Liuyang-Liling Guanzhuang district of Hunan Province. Miner. Resour. Geol. 2019, 33, 7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, C.; Shao, Y.J.; Zhang, X.; Lai, C.; Liu, Z.F.; Li, H.; Ge, H.; Liu, Q.Q. Metallogenesis of the Hengjiangchong gold deposit in Jiangnan orogen, South China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 118, 103350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.C.; Shao, Y.J.; Liu, Q.Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhan, Y.D.; Wang, C.; Wu, H.H.; Sun, J. Pyrite textures, trace element and sulfur isotopes of Yanlinsi slate-hosted deposit in the Jiangnan Orogen, South China: Implications for gold mineralization processes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 148, 105029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.C.; Shao, Y.J.; Liu, Q.Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, R.Y.; Yuan, Z.K.; Wang, C.; Sun, J. Multistage mineralization of the Liling goldfield (NE Hunan) in the Jiangnan Orogen: Constraints from hydrothermal rutile U–Pb dating and sericite Rb–Sr dating. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 159, 105568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, C.; Shao, Y.J.; Goldfarb, R.; Tan, S.M.; Sun, J.; Zhou, C.; Zheng, H.; Liu, Q.Q.; Xiong, Y.Q. Superimposed gold mineralization events in the Tuanshanbei orogenic gold deposit, central Jiangnan orogen, South China. Econ. Geol. 2024, 119, 113–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, B.; Liu, X. Preliminary Study on Tectono-Geochemistry of Gold Mineralization in the Qingcaopo Ductile Shear Zone, Eastern Hunan. Geol. Geochem. 1997, 3, 1–6, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, C.; Shao, Y.J.; Chen, X.L.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Wei, H.T.; Liu, Q.Q. Genesis of the Jinji gold deposit in the Jiangnan Orogen, South China: Constraints from geology, chlorite geochemistry, age and HOS-Pb isotopes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 155, 105352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhan, Y.D.; Shao, Y.J.; Liu, Q.Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M.H.; Lu, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, H.J. Hydrothermal rutile U-Pb dating of gold mineralization in the Jiangnan Orogen: A case study of the Hengjiangchong gold deposit in northeastern Hunan. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 149, 105115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, D.R.; Wu, Y.Z. Discussion on the Genesis of the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit in Liling City. Geol. Hunan 1993, 4, 247–251, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  42. Hou, D.Z.; Lin, S.; Liu, L.; Huan, C.; Qiu, H.; Tu, B.B. Metal Source and Fluid Evolution in Xiaojiashan Gold Deposit in Northeastern Hunan, China: Implications of Rare Earth Elements, Fluid Inclusions, and Pyrite S Isotopic Compositions. Minerals 2023, 13, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, W.D.; Yang, X.Y.; Fan, W.M.; Wu, F.Y. Mesozoic large scale magmatism and mineralization in South China: Preface. Lithos 2012, 150, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.J.; Ji, J.F.; Cui, W.D.; Sun, C.Y. Distribution characteristics of gold and other trace elements in the Proterozoic Lengjiaxi Group, northeastern Hunan Province. Chin. J. Geochem. 1992, 11, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, C.Y.; Liao, J.; Zhu, Z.H.; Chen, B.; Peng, N.L.; Gao, X. Pyrite Texture, Geochemical and Isotopic Signatures of Huangjindong Gold Deposit: Implication for Ore-Forming Process. Geol. J. 2025, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Madayipu, N.; Li, H.; Algeo, T.J.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Heritier, R.s.N.n.; Zhou, H.X.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Q.H. Long-lived Nb-Ta mineralization in Mufushan, NE Hunan, South China: Geological, geochemical, and geochronological constraints. Geosci. Front. 2023, 14, 101491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Madayipu, N.; Li, H.; Algeo, T.J.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Q.H.; Chen, Y.L.; Sun, W.B. Chemical and boron isotopic compositions of tourmalines from the Lianyunshan Nb-Ta pegmatite in northeastern Hunan, China: Insights into fluid and metallogenic sources. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 152, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Madayipu, N.; Li, H.; Ghaderi, M.; Tamehe, L.S.; Zhou, H.X.; Wu, Q.H.; Zheng, H.; Chen, Y.L.; Kang, F. Contrasting Nb-Ta mineralization between the Mufushan and Lianyunshan granites, South China: Evidence from whole-rock and zircon geochemistry and geochronology. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 158, 105487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.S.; Gao, S.; Hu, Z.C.; Gao, C.G.; Zong, K.Q.; Wang, D.B. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt–peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U–Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 537–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Gao, S.; Günther, D.; Xu, J.; Gao, C.; Chen, H. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem. Geol. 2008, 257, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. GB/T 14506.31–2019; Methods for Chemical Analysis of Silicate Rocks—Part 31: Determination of 12 Components Including Silicon Dioxide Etc.—Lithium Metaborate Fusion-Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2019.
  52. GB/T 14506.30–2010; Methods for Chemical Analysis of Silicate Rocks—Part 30: Determination of 44 Elements. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2010.
  53. Rubatto, D. Zircon trace element geochemistry: Partitioning with garnet and the link between U–Pb ages and metamorphism. Chem. Geol. 2002, 184, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hoskin, P.W. Trace-element composition of hydrothermal zircon and the alteration of Hadean zircon from the Jack Hills, Australia. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, W.C.; Li, H.; Turner, S.; Zhu, D.P.; Wang, C. Timing and origin of multi-stage magmatism and related W–Mo–Pb–Zn–Fe–Cu mineralization in the Huangshaping deposit, South China: An integrated zircon study. Chem. Geol. 2020, 552, 119782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, H.; Hu, X.J.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Wu, J.H.; Jiang, W.C.; Sun, W.B.; Madayipu, N. Zircon as a pathfinder for ore exploration. J. Geochem. Explor. 2023, 249, 107216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Winchester, J.A.; Floyd, P.A. Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements. Chem. Geol. 1977, 20, 325–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Peccerillo, A.; Taylor, S. Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1976, 58, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, S.-S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, F.F.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhang, A.M.; Fan, W.M.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Zi, J.W. Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of Middle Paleozoic (Kwangsian) massive granites in the eastern South China Block. Lithos 2012, 150, 188–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martin, H.; Smithies, R.; Rapp, R.; Moyen, J.-F.; Champion, D. An overview of adakite, tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG), and sanukitoid: Relationships and some implications for crustal evolution. Lithos 2005, 79, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Patiño Douce, A.E. What do experiments tell us about the relative contributions of crust and mantle to the origin of granitic magmas? Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1999, 168, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rudnick, R.; Gao, S. Composition of the continental crust. Treat. Geochem. 2003, 3, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ling, H.F.; Shen, W.Z.; Deng, P.; Jiang, S.Y.; Jiang, Y.H.; Ye, H.M.; Pu, W.; Tan, Z.Z. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of the Luxi-Xianrenzhang diabase dikes in Xiazhuang Uranium Orefield, Northern Guangdong Province. Acta Geol. Sin.-Engl. Ed. 2005, 79, 497–506. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hu, Z.; Zeng, L.; Förster, M.W.; Zhao, L.; Gao, L.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, S. Recycling of subducted continental crust: Geochemical evidence from syn-exhumation Triassic alkaline mafic rocks of the southern Liaodong Peninsula. Lithos 2021, 400, 106353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Koua, K.A.D.; Sun, H.S.; Li, Z.K.; Li, H.; Li, J.W.; Yang, H.; Yuan, Z.Z. Geochemistry of sulfide in mafic enclaves from Gushan granite: Implications for the role of contemporaneous mafic magma in the genesis of the large-scale Jiaodong gold province, eastern China. Bulletin 2024, 136, 1916–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lemdjou, Y.B.; De Pesquidoux, I.; Li, H.; Whattam, S.A.; Tamehe, L.S.; Elatikpo, S.M.; Madayipu, N. Cambrian mafic magmatism in the Kékem area, NW edge of the Adamawa-Yadé domain, Central African Fold Belt: Implications for Western Gondwana dynamics. Precambrian Res. 2022, 380, 106840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wu, J.H.; Li, H.; Xi, X.S.; Kong, H.; Wu, Q.H.; Peng, N.L.; Wu, X.M.; Cao, J.Y.; Gabo-Ratio, J.A.S. Geochemistry and geochronology of the mafic dikes in the Taipusi area, northern margin of North China Craton: Implications for Silurian tectonic evolution of the Central Asian Orogen. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 126, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Green, T.H. Significance of Nb/Ta as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust-mantle system. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kalfoun, F.; Ionov, D.; Merlet, C. HFSE residence and Nb/Ta ratios in metasomatised, rutile-bearing mantle peridotites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002, 199, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Weaver, B.L. The origin of ocean island basalt end-member compositions: Trace element and isotopic constraints. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1991, 104, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hofmann, A.W. Chemical differentiation of the Earth: The relationship between mantle, continental crust, and oceanic crust. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1988, 90, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Green, D.H. Genesis of Archean peridotitic magmas and constraints on Archean geothermal gradients and tectonics. Geology 1975, 3, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wilson, M. Igneous Petrogenesis; Unwin Hyman: London, UK; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; pp. 1–466. [Google Scholar]
  75. Frey, F.A.; Green, D.H.; Roy, S.D. Integrated models of basalt petrogenesis: A study of quartz tholeiites to olivine melilitites from southeastern Australia utilizing geochemical and experimental petrological data. J. Petrol. 1978, 19, 463–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ma, X.; Chen, B.; Chen, J.F.; Niu, X.L. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age, geochemical, Sr-Nd isotopic, and in-situ Hf isotopic data of the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian plutons in the northern margin of the North China Craton. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2013, 56, 126–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Qin, Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Huang, L.; Liang, C.; Yang, L.H.; Peng, H.; Zhang, W.F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.H.; Liu, W.S. The petrogenesis of Cenozoic basalts from Daihai, western North China Craton: Constraints from 40Ar-39Ar chronology, major and trace elements, and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopes. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2024, 272, 106251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, W.D.; Zhang, W.L.; Wang, R.C.; Chu, Z.Y.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, D.; Che, X.D. A study on the Dushiling tungsten-copper deposit in the Miao’ershan-Yuechengling area, Northern Guangxi, China: Implications for variations in the mineralization of multi-aged composite granite plutons. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2016, 59, 2121–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sun, L.Y.; Li, X.L.; Yang, D.; Dong, J.; Yu, X.L.; Li, H.; Qian, Y.; Wang, C.; Sun, F.Y. Petrogenesis and Sc mineralization potential of the early Silurian Halaguole Alaskan-type complex in the East Kunlun orogenic belt. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 175, 106354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jochum, K.P.; McDonough, W.F.; Palme, H.; Spettel, B. Compositional constraints on the continental lithospheric mantle from trace elements in spinel peridotite xenoliths. Nature 1989, 340, 548–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S.S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hart, S.; Hauri, E.; Oschmann, L.; Whitehead, J. Mantle plumes and entrainment: Isotopic evidence. Science 1992, 256, 517–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pearce, J.A.; Peate, D.W. Tectonic implications of the composition of volcanic arc magmas. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1995, 23, 251–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Staudigel, H.; Hart, S.R. Alteration of basaltic glass: Mechanisms and significance for the oceanic crust-seawater budget. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1983, 47, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, J.W.; Dai, C.G.; Huang, Z.L.; Luo, T.Y.; Qian, Z.K.; Zhang, Y. Age and petrogenesis of Anisian magnesian alkali basalts and their genetic association with the Kafang stratiform Cu deposit in the Gejiu supergiant tin-polymetallic district, SW China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 69, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Deniel, C. Geochemical and isotopic (Sr, Nd, Pb) evidence for plume-lithosphee interactions in the genesis of Grande Comore magmas (Indian Ocean). Oceanogr. Lit. Rev. 1998, 9, 1559–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Aldanmaz, E.; Pearce, J.A.; Thirlwall, M.; Mitchell, J. Petrogenetic evolution of late Cenozoic, post-collision volcanism in western Anatolia, Turkey. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2000, 102, 67–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Meschede, M. A method of discriminating between different types of mid-ocean ridge basalts and continental tholeiites with the Nb-Zr-Y diagram. Chem. Geol. 1986, 56, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pearce, J.A.; Norry, M.J. Petrogenetic implications of Ti, Zr, Y, and Nb variations in volcanic rocks. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1979, 69, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pearce, J.A.; Cann, J.R. Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analyses. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1973, 19, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, C.J.; Xiu, S.Z. Discrimination of Tectonic Settings for Basalt Formation Using Th/Hf-Ta/Hf Diagrams. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2001, 3, 413–421, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhou, X.M.; Li, W.X. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: Implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas. Tectonophysics 2000, 326, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shu, L.S.; Faure, M.; Wang, B.; Zhou, X.M.; Song, B. Late Palaeozoic–Early Mesozoic geological features of South China: Response to the Indosinian collision events in Southeast Asia. Comptes Rendus Géoscience 2008, 340, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, Y.J.; Fan, W.M.; Zhang, G.W.; Zhang, Y.H. Phanerozoic tectonics of the South China Block: Key observations and controversies. Gondwana Res. 2013, 23, 1273–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhou, X.M.; Sun, T.; Shen, W.Z.; Shu, L.S.; Niu, Y.L. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids and volcanic rocks in South China: A response to tectonic evolution. Epis. J. Int. Geosci. 2006, 29, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wang, Y.J.; Fan, W.M.; Sun, M.; Liang, X.Q.; Zhang, Y.H.; Peng, T.P. Geochronological, geochemical and geothermal constraints on petrogenesis of the Indosinian peraluminous granites in the South China Block: A case study in the Hunan Province. Lithos 2007, 96, 475–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, J.X.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.L.; Du, D.H.; Xing, G.F.; Fu, J.M.; Chen, X.; Sun, Z.M. Refining the spatio-temporal distributions of Mesozoic granitoids and volcanic rocks in SE China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2020, 201, 104503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yu, Y.S.; Dai, P.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xie, F. Petrogenesis and geodynamic implications of the late Triassic bojites in Yajiangqiao area, Hunan Province, South China. Isl. Arc 2020, 29, e12370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yao, Y.; Chen, J.; Lu, J.J.; Zhang, R.Q. Geochronology, Hf Isotopic, and Geochemical Characteristics of the Xitian A-Type Granites in Eastern Hunan and Their Geological Significance. Miner. Depos. Geol. 2013, 32, 467–488, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  100. Fu, S.L.; Hu, R.Z.; Bi, X.W.; Chen, Y.W.; Yang, J.H.; Huang, Y. Origin of Triassic granites in central Hunan Province, South China: Constraints from zircon U–Pb ages and Hf and O isotopes. Int. Geol. Rev. 2015, 57, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ding, X.; Chen, P.R.; Chen, W.F.; Huang, H.Y.; Zhou, X.M. Single zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating of Weishan granite (Hunan, South China) and its petrogenetic significance. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2006, 49, 816–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Min, M.Z.; Luo, X.Z.; Li, X.G.; Yang, Z.; Zhai, L.Y. Geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of the Middle Miaoershan granitoids, South China. Geochem. J. 2003, 37, 603–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhao, K.D.; Jiang, S.Y.; Sun, T.; Chen, W.F.; Ling, H.F.; Chen, P.R. Zircon U–Pb dating, trace element and Sr–Nd–Hf isotope geochemistry of Paleozoic granites in the Miao’ershan—Yuechengling batholith, South China: Implication for petrogenesis and tectonic–magmatic evolution. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 74, 244–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhu, Y.T.; Li, X.F.; Xiao, R.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.Z. Multistage magmatic-hydrothermal activity and W-Cu mineralization at Jiepai, Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region, South China: Constraints from geochronology and Nd-Sr-Hf-O isotopes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 121, 103492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.D.; Xiao, Q.H.; Geng, S.F.; Wang, T.; Chen, B.H. New Evidence for the Formation Age of Alkaline Basalts in the Ningyuan Area, Southern Hunan: Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Dating. Geol. Bull. China 2010, 29, 833–841, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  106. Dai, B.Z.; Jiang, S.Y.; Jiang, Y.H.; Zhao, K.D.; Liu, D.Y. Geochronology, geochemistry and Hf–Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of Huziyan mafic xenoliths, southern Hunan Province, South China: Petrogenesis and implications for lower crust evolution. Lithos 2008, 102, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jiang, Y.H.; Jiang, S.Y.; Dai, B.Z.; Liao, S.Y.; Zhao, K.D.; Ling, H.F. Middle to late Jurassic felsic and mafic magmatism in southern Hunan province, southeast China: Implications for a continental arc to rifting. Lithos 2009, 107, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jin, X.B.; Wang, L.; Xiang, H.; Liu, Z.P.; Duan, G.L.; Li, Z.Y. Genesis of Indosinian Diabases in the Taojiang Area, Hunan: Constraints from Geochemistry, Chronology, and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes. Geol. Bull. China 2017, 36, 750–760, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  109. Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.Q.; Shao, Y.J.; Wu, S.C.; Pan, Z.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Y.C.; Wu, H.H. Genesis of the Lishupo gold deposit in the Jiangnan orogen, NE Hunan (South China): Biotite Ar-Ar, zircon U-Pb ages and H-O-S-Pb isotopic constraints. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 145, 104890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Geological map of the Yanlinsi Au ore district, modified after [31]. 1. Quaternary; 2. Upper member of neoproterozoic Huanghudong formation; 3. Middle member of neoproterozoic Huanghudong formation; 4. Lower member of neoproterozoic Huanghudong formation; 5. Overturned anticline; 6. Fracture zone; 7. Vein zone and number; 8. Gold ore vein (inferred ore vein), Attitude and number; 9. Quartz vein; 10. Attitude; 11. Attitude of overturned strata; 12. Sampling location.
Figure 2. Geological map of the Yanlinsi Au ore district, modified after [31]. 1. Quaternary; 2. Upper member of neoproterozoic Huanghudong formation; 3. Middle member of neoproterozoic Huanghudong formation; 4. Lower member of neoproterozoic Huanghudong formation; 5. Overturned anticline; 6. Fracture zone; 7. Vein zone and number; 8. Gold ore vein (inferred ore vein), Attitude and number; 9. Quartz vein; 10. Attitude; 11. Attitude of overturned strata; 12. Sampling location.
Minerals 15 01190 g002
Figure 3. Generalized geological profile along #3 Prospecting line of the Yanlinsi Au ore prospect.
Figure 3. Generalized geological profile along #3 Prospecting line of the Yanlinsi Au ore prospect.
Minerals 15 01190 g003
Figure 4. Field photographs and petrographic features of gold-bearing quartz vein, diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. Photos of gold-bearing quartz veins in the underground of Yanlinsi mining area (a); gold ore specimens (b,c); microscopic images of gold ores (gi); photos of diabase in the underground of Yanlinsi mining area (d); diabase rock specimens (e,f); microscopic features of diabase (jl); Abbreviations: Apy—Arsenopyrite; Ccp—Chalcopyrite; Dol—Dolomite; Gl—Native gold; Gn—Galena; Mt—Magnetite; Pl—Plagioclase; Px—Pyroxene; Py—Pyrite; Qtz—Quartz; Ser—Sericite; Sp—Sphalerite.
Figure 4. Field photographs and petrographic features of gold-bearing quartz vein, diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. Photos of gold-bearing quartz veins in the underground of Yanlinsi mining area (a); gold ore specimens (b,c); microscopic images of gold ores (gi); photos of diabase in the underground of Yanlinsi mining area (d); diabase rock specimens (e,f); microscopic features of diabase (jl); Abbreviations: Apy—Arsenopyrite; Ccp—Chalcopyrite; Dol—Dolomite; Gl—Native gold; Gn—Galena; Mt—Magnetite; Pl—Plagioclase; Px—Pyroxene; Py—Pyrite; Qtz—Quartz; Ser—Sericite; Sp—Sphalerite.
Minerals 15 01190 g004
Figure 5. Cathodoluminescence images of the representative zircon grains from the diabase dike in the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Figure 5. Cathodoluminescence images of the representative zircon grains from the diabase dike in the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Minerals 15 01190 g005
Figure 6. Zircon U-Pb concordia (a) and weighted average age (b) diagrams of the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Figure 6. Zircon U-Pb concordia (a) and weighted average age (b) diagrams of the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Minerals 15 01190 g006
Figure 7. Cathodoluminescence images of the hydrothermal zircon grains from the quartz vein in the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Figure 7. Cathodoluminescence images of the hydrothermal zircon grains from the quartz vein in the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Minerals 15 01190 g007
Figure 8. U-Pb concordia diagram (a) and weighted mean plot (b) of hydrothermal zircons from gold-bearing quartz veins in the Yanlinsi mining area.
Figure 8. U-Pb concordia diagram (a) and weighted mean plot (b) of hydrothermal zircons from gold-bearing quartz veins in the Yanlinsi mining area.
Minerals 15 01190 g008
Figure 9. Nb/Y-Zr/TiO2 diagram (a) and SiO2-K2O diagram (b) of the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The base map data of (a,b) are derived from [57] and [58], respectively.
Figure 9. Nb/Y-Zr/TiO2 diagram (a) and SiO2-K2O diagram (b) of the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The base map data of (a,b) are derived from [57] and [58], respectively.
Minerals 15 01190 g009
Figure 10. Primitive-mantle-normalized multi-element diagrams (a) and chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns (b) of the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The data for primitive mantle, chondrite, OIB, N-MORB, and E-MORB are from [59].
Figure 10. Primitive-mantle-normalized multi-element diagrams (a) and chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns (b) of the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The data for primitive mantle, chondrite, OIB, N-MORB, and E-MORB are from [59].
Minerals 15 01190 g010
Figure 11. La/Nb-Ba/Nb diagram (a) and Nb-Nb/U diagram (b) for the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The data for OIB and N-MORB are from [59], and BCC from [63]. In Figure (a), the BCC data lie above the direction indicated by the arrow and fall outside the range.
Figure 11. La/Nb-Ba/Nb diagram (a) and Nb-Nb/U diagram (b) for the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The data for OIB and N-MORB are from [59], and BCC from [63]. In Figure (a), the BCC data lie above the direction indicated by the arrow and fall outside the range.
Minerals 15 01190 g011
Figure 12. Major oxide element and trace element Harker diagrams for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. (a) Al2O3–SiO2; (b) MgO–SiO2; (c) TiO2–MgO; (d) Co–MgO; (e) Ni–MgO; (f) Cr–MgO.
Figure 12. Major oxide element and trace element Harker diagrams for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. (a) Al2O3–SiO2; (b) MgO–SiO2; (c) TiO2–MgO; (d) Co–MgO; (e) Ni–MgO; (f) Cr–MgO.
Minerals 15 01190 g012
Figure 13. Nb/Yb–Ta/Yb diagram (a) and Nb/Yb–La/Yb diagram (b) for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The base map data are derived from [83].
Figure 13. Nb/Yb–Ta/Yb diagram (a) and Nb/Yb–La/Yb diagram (b) for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The base map data are derived from [83].
Minerals 15 01190 g013
Figure 14. Zr/Nb–Ce/Y diagram (a) and Sm–Sm/Yb diagram (b) for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The base map data of (a,b) are derived from [86] and [87], respectively.
Figure 14. Zr/Nb–Ce/Y diagram (a) and Sm–Sm/Yb diagram (b) for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. The base map data of (a,b) are derived from [86] and [87], respectively.
Minerals 15 01190 g014
Figure 15. Discrimination diagrams of tectonic setting for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. (a) The base map data are derived from [89]; (b) The base map data are derived from [88]; (c) The base map data are derived from [90]; (d) The base map data are derived from [91].
Figure 15. Discrimination diagrams of tectonic setting for the diabase dike samples from the Yanlinsi gold deposit. (a) The base map data are derived from [89]; (b) The base map data are derived from [88]; (c) The base map data are derived from [90]; (d) The base map data are derived from [91].
Minerals 15 01190 g015
Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data for the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data for the diabase dike from the Yanlinsi gold deposit.
NumberContent (×10−6)Th/UIsotope RatioAge (Ma)
ThU207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U208Pb/232Th207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U208Pb/232Th
115CM3-1-1482430.200.15200.00218.89290.16560.42330.00600.12740.00652368.823.02327.117.02275.227.02424.3117.4
115CM3-1-2701150.610.10120.00163.69210.05880.26430.00310.08040.00391646.629.51569.712.71511.815.71563.972.2
115CM3-1-482332170.260.05160.00070.24630.00360.03460.00050.01180.0005333.429.6223.62.9219.23.0236.410.4
115CM3-1-5100137810.260.05210.00100.24570.00860.03500.00220.01150.0006300.144.4223.17.0221.514.0231.612.5
115CM3-1-639610170.390.05050.00100.24010.00440.03450.00040.01080.0005216.744.4218.53.6218.72.6216.810.1
115CM3-1-727910370.270.13340.07980.26450.01260.03460.00130.01390.00302142.91288.9238.310.1219.08.3278.959.6
115CM3-1-84675990.780.05250.00120.25370.00590.03500.00050.01000.0005309.353.7229.64.8222.02.9201.310.8
115CM3-1-92715220.520.04890.00130.23270.00560.03460.00050.01100.0006142.765.7212.54.6219.33.4222.012.9
115CM3-1-1098827430.360.05130.00080.24400.00340.03450.00040.01240.0006257.539.8221.72.8218.42.3249.712.1
115CM3-1-111944470.440.05310.00150.25350.00590.03470.00040.01130.0006344.530.6229.44.8219.92.3227.112.1
115CM3-1-1269819190.360.05040.00080.23770.00390.03420.00050.01080.0005213.041.7216.53.2217.02.9218.010.4
115CM3-1-1359530950.190.05100.00080.24480.00590.03480.00070.01200.0006239.032.4222.34.8220.54.5241.312.1
115CM3-1-14156334200.460.05070.00110.24290.00770.03590.00260.01080.0006227.850.0220.86.3227.316.5216.211.1
115CM3-1-1548915760.310.05160.00120.24730.00520.03480.00070.01050.0006333.451.8224.44.2220.84.4211.113.0
115CM3-1-165627620.740.05580.00110.26530.00570.03450.00040.01080.0007442.644.4238.94.5218.52.5216.313.2
115CM3-1-172075530.370.05170.00160.23840.00690.03360.00050.01070.0008333.470.4217.15.7212.73.3214.515.8
115CM3-1-1921714720.150.05580.00150.26670.00710.03460.00040.01190.0007442.659.3240.15.7219.52.3238.313.3
115CM3-1-213414940.690.05190.00160.24930.00770.03490.00050.01070.0006279.772.2226.06.3220.92.9216.111.1
115CM3-1-221002420.410.05190.00250.24690.01120.03460.00050.01050.0006279.7112.9224.09.1219.33.3210.812.8
115CM3-1-2443711660.370.09630.00202.54990.14260.18830.00890.05810.00431553.738.31286.440.81112.148.21141.682.4
115CM3-1-26101413220.770.05310.00100.25360.00480.03460.00050.01040.0005331.536.1229.53.9219.22.8209.210.1
115CM3-1-274896700.730.09420.00452.46850.21460.17930.00790.04630.00251522.2289.81262.862.91062.943.1914.748.1
115CM3-1-2946410750.430.05390.00100.25800.00530.03460.00040.01060.0005368.642.6233.04.3219.52.7212.710.7
115CM3-1-3151210750.480.05540.00160.25460.00680.03330.00040.00960.0006431.564.8230.35.5211.42.3193.011.8
YLS-CM1-4-025306670.790.06880.0021.19310.04530.12350.00160.03780.0010891.770.4797.421.0750.89.4749.119.1
YLS-CM1-4-0389527890.320.05150.0010.33810.00900.04700.00050.01360.0004264.958.3295.76.9296.03.0272.17.1
YLS-CM1-4-431611010.290.05760.00190.53770.01770.06710.00080.02010.0006516.772.2436.911.7418.74.8401.312.5
YLS-CM1-4-054604561.010.07100.0031.40640.05380.14260.00200.04680.0012966.777.5891.622.7859.111.1924.523.3
YLS-CM1-4-7111619790.560.05880.00190.55700.01720.06790.00070.02200.0006566.770.4449.611.2423.74.3439.511.3
YLS-CM1-4-083209233480.140.05220.0010.23410.00500.03200.00030.01060.0003294.545.4213.64.1203.11.6213.85.4
YLS-CM1-4-092423490.700.11690.0035.52370.14090.33770.00360.09380.00211909.644.91904.322.01875.617.21812.539.5
YLS-CM1-4-1088417060.520.04990.0020.32800.01090.04730.00060.01490.0004190.877.8288.08.3297.73.6299.47.7
YLS-CM1-4-1175415130.500.05370.00170.52420.01720.06990.00090.02160.0006366.772.2428.011.5435.75.3432.711.5
YLS-CM1-4-1329670.430.12710.0064.72590.21760.27320.00630.11240.00462058.378.71771.838.61556.831.82152.983.0
YLS-CM1-4-142133510.610.13720.0037.85910.18800.41030.00460.11880.00292191.741.12215.021.62216.120.82269.052.9
YLS-CM1-4-1583612400.670.05920.00180.53210.01520.06480.00070.02040.0005576.066.7433.210.1404.64.1407.39.4
YLS-CM1-4-168126861.180.05670.00280.49560.02340.06350.00080.01940.0005479.7109.2408.715.9397.14.7388.69.1
YLS-CM1-4-1783211480.720.05670.00200.55260.01850.07040.00080.02110.0005479.777.8446.712.1438.44.6422.010.0
YLS-CM1-4-19146025500.570.05490.0020.34310.01150.04530.00050.01430.0004409.386.1299.58.7285.82.9287.77.1
YLS-CM1-4-2157312720.450.06980.00260.63740.02130.06660.00080.02820.0009924.170.2500.713.2415.54.6562.318.0
YLS-CM1-4-22151318340.820.05400.00160.50970.01580.06780.00080.02080.0005372.368.5418.210.6423.04.7416.010.0
YLS-CM1-4-2579456750.140.06570.0021.22080.02950.13340.00130.04120.0010794.455.7810.113.5807.07.5815.818.7
YLS-CM1-4-2652315790.330.07940.0031.35580.04280.12270.00100.04510.00131183.369.4870.118.5745.96.0892.124.5
YLS-CM1-4-2795910460.920.05980.00200.58150.01850.07010.00070.02170.0005596.070.4465.411.9436.94.1434.410.2
YLS-CM1-4-2960012720.470.05890.00200.55930.01980.06820.00080.02160.0006561.174.1451.112.9425.05.0432.611.3
Table 2. Major oxide (wt%) and trace oxide (×10−6) element data for the Yanlinsi diabase samples.
Table 2. Major oxide (wt%) and trace oxide (×10−6) element data for the Yanlinsi diabase samples.
Sample #115CM3-1-1115CM3-1-2115CM3-1-3115CM3-1-4ZK002-2AZK002-2BZK002-2CZK002-2DZK701-1ZK701-2ZK701-3ZK701-4
SiO245.8845.8746.5546.1943.6843.9545.0844.1245.6545.6346.2946.34
TiO21.581.561.571.591.841.661.681.651.521.551.581.58
Al2O314.7614.6414.7314.8815.1613.8814.2713.9614.1414.3614.4414.51
Fe2O3T11.3611.2711.2611.459.7810.2610.399.8610.7911.0511.2211.20
MnO0.140.140.170.140.130.140.140.150.140.140.150.15
MgO9.849.849.809.807.789.249.788.909.629.569.569.58
CaO7.007.427.276.486.977.827.217.917.687.567.417.35
Na2O2.242.232.322.242.272.242.302.222.422.482.662.54
K2O1.701.741.831.741.151.431.651.611.351.421.421.42
P2O50.300.300.300.300.390.350.350.350.290.290.300.30
LOI5.034.924.545.479.858.637.058.515.445.615.284.87
Total99.8399.93100.34100.2899.0099.6099.9099.2499.0499.65100.3199.84
Mg#66.967.067.066.665.067.768.767.867.566.866.566.6
Na2O + K2O3.943.974.153.983.423.673.953.833.773.904.083.96
Rb54.656.060.452.238.842.450.550.445.544.747.543.0
Ba641627635647525679740710540550568640
Th4.534.664.514.595.464.884.915.274.424.524.374.55
U0.780.760.780.801.090.890.940.930.730.760.760.76
Nb32.832.133.133.140.636.637.936.030.430.429.829.1
Ta1.751.751.781.782.52.22.22.11.71.61.71.7
La31.031.231.230.841.037.537.836.332.031.431.828.9
Ce56.356.457.555.476.671.772.676.261.461.261.661.6
Pr6.316.396.546.218.007.337.527.796.386.306.316.27
Sr505501491517475607594617493499470497
Nd22.823.223.822.527.825.125.627.222.421.721.623.0
Sm4.134.204.273.974.604.184.144.313.743.773.743.79
Zr140137140140174153151154135137142137
Hf3.33.43.33.43.83.33.63.43.13.03.13.1
Eu1.341.341.371.301.521.341.421.511.251.271.271.32
Gd3.883.914.013.704.553.933.984.013.643.783.833.76
Tb0.650.640.620.580.650.570.600.630.610.600.580.62
Dy3.833.843.623.463.903.633.463.713.623.483.553.70
Y18.918.919.718.322.019.819.320.119.919.619.819.3
Ho0.760.750.760.740.800.720.700.780.720.720.730.74
Er1.991.982.041.962.292.042.101.982.041.952.082.02
Tm0.290.290.300.290.310.280.270.290.290.270.280.29
Yb1.921.851.931.882.001.831.831.811.821.781.921.85
Lu0.300.290.310.300.310.260.280.270.280.280.280.28
Co46.747.848.248.642.147.151.649.753.851.651.753.1
Cr400400400400290350380360370350360350
Ni244249255245163.0222249224257242245252
Rb/Sr0.110.110.120.100.080.070.090.080.090.090.100.09
Ba/Rb11.7411.2010.5112.3913.5316.0114.6514.0911.8712.3011.9614.88
Nb/Ta18.7418.3418.6018.6016.2416.6417.2317.1417.8819.0017.5317.12
Zr/Hf42.4240.2942.4241.1845.7946.3641.9445.2943.5545.6745.8144.19
Dy/Yb1.992.081.881.841.951.981.892.051.991.961.852.00
ΣREEs135.50136.28138.27133.09174.33160.41162.3166.79140.19138.5139.57138.14
LREEs121.88122.73124.68120.18159.52147.15149.08153.31127.17125.64126.32124.88
HREEs13.6213.5513.5912.9114.8113.2613.2213.4813.0212.8613.2513.26
LREEs/HREEs8.959.069.179.3110.7711.1011.2811.379.779.779.539.42
(La/Yb)N11.5812.1011.6011.7514.7014.7014.8214.3912.6112.6511.8811.21
δEu1.021.011.011.041.021.011.071.111.041.031.031.07
δCe0.990.980.990.981.041.061.061.111.051.071.071.12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, C.; Sun, J.; Xiao, R.; Lu, W.; Meng, Z.; Tan, S.; Peng, W.; Tu, E. Zircon U-Pb Age, Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Diabase in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan Province. Minerals 2025, 15, 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111190

AMA Style

Zhou C, Sun J, Xiao R, Lu W, Meng Z, Tan S, Peng W, Tu E. Zircon U-Pb Age, Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Diabase in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan Province. Minerals. 2025; 15(11):1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Chao, Ji Sun, Rong Xiao, Wen Lu, Zhengyong Meng, Shimin Tan, Wei Peng, and Enbo Tu. 2025. "Zircon U-Pb Age, Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Diabase in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan Province" Minerals 15, no. 11: 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111190

APA Style

Zhou, C., Sun, J., Xiao, R., Lu, W., Meng, Z., Tan, S., Peng, W., & Tu, E. (2025). Zircon U-Pb Age, Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Diabase in the Yanlinsi Gold Deposit, Northeastern Hunan Province. Minerals, 15(11), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop