Next Article in Journal
Recovery of Copper from Pregnant Leach Solutions of Copper Concentrate Using Aluminum Shavings
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Multi-Source Information-Based Mineral Prospecting Prediction Using Machine Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimized Hydrothermal Alteration Mapping in Porphyry Copper Systems Using a Hybrid DWT-2D/MAD Algorithm on ASTER Satellite Remote Sensing Imagery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extraction of Remote Sensing Alteration Information Based on Integrated Spectral Mixture Analysis and Fractal Analysis

1
Research Center of Applied Geology of China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610036, China
2
Shandong Provincial Nuclear Industry Geological Group 273, Yantai 264000, China
3
Liaoning Datang International Shendong Thermal Power Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(10), 1047; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15101047
Submission received: 6 June 2025 / Revised: 23 September 2025 / Accepted: 29 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025

Abstract

As a key target area in China’s new round of strategic mineral exploration initiatives, Tibet possesses favorable metallogenic conditions shaped by its unique geological evolution and tectonic setting. In this paper, the Saga region of Tibet is the research object, and Level-2A Sentinel-2 imagery is utilized. By applying mixed pixel decomposition, interfering endmembers were identified, and spectral unmixing and reconstruction were performed, effectively avoiding the drawback of traditional methods that tend to remove mineral alteration signals and masking interference. Combined with band ratio analysis and principal component analysis (PCA), various types of remote sensing alteration anomalies in the region were extracted. Furthermore, the fractal box-counting method was employed to quantify the fractal dimensions of the different alteration anomalies, thereby delineating their spatial distribution and fractal structural characteristics. Based on these results, two prospective mineralization zones were identified. The results indicate the following: (1) In areas of Tibet with low vegetation cover, applying spectral mixture analysis (SMA) effectively removes substantial background interference, thereby enabling the extraction of subtle remote sensing alteration anomalies. (2) The fractal dimensions of various remote sensing alteration anomalies were calculated using the fractal box-counting method over a spatial scale range of 0.765 to 6.123 km. These values quantitatively characterize the spatial fractal properties of the anomalies, and the differences in fractal dimensions among alteration types reflect the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the mineralization system. (3) The high-potential mineralization zones identified in the composite contour map of fractal dimensions of alteration anomalies show strong spatial agreement with known mineralization sites. Additionally, two new prospective mineralization zones were delineated in their periphery, providing theoretical support and exploration targets for future prospecting in the study area.

1. Introduction

Hydrothermal alteration of wall rocks near ore bodies is primarily the result of interactions between various types of hydrothermal fluids and surrounding rocks, representing the imprints of the progressive enrichment and concentration of ore-forming materials. Quantitative information related to geological structures, ore-bearing geological bodies, and alteration associated with metal mineralization can be comprehensively captured and interpreted through remote sensing-derived alteration signals across various data sources. These signals serve as indicators of potentially altered rocks proximal to mineralization zones, and the alteration information extracted via remote sensing provides a geological basis for guiding mineral deposit prediction [1,2,3,4,5]. As a key target area in China’s new round of strategic mineral exploration initiatives, Tibet possesses favorable metallogenic conditions shaped by its unique geological evolution and tectonic setting [6,7,8]. Although the region’s harsh natural environment imposes multiple technical challenges on conventional surface exploration methods, its sparse vegetation cover offers a distinct advantage for accurately identifying and extracting alteration anomalies using remote sensing techniques [9,10,11]. Therefore, developing a high-precision remote sensing model for alteration information extraction has become urgent in advancing Tibet’s new phase of mineral prospecting studies.
At present, methods such as band ratio analysis [12,13,14], principal component analysis (PCA) [15,16,17], spectral mixture analysis (SMA) [18,19,20], spectral angle mapper (SAM) [21,22,23], and minimum noise fraction (MNF) transformation [24,25,26] are widely applied in the extraction of mineralization-related alteration information. Among these methods, SMA has gradually attracted increasing attention from researchers due to its high accuracy, intuitive interpretability, and robustness. In remote sensing imagery, pixels represent the fundamental units of an image. However, due to spatial resolution limitations and small-scale surface features, a single pixel often contains spectral information from two or more distinct land cover types. Such pixels are referred to as mixed pixels [27,28,29]. The spectral characteristics of remote sensing imagery represent a mixed response of the spectral signatures of various endmembers comprising each pixel. During the extraction of alteration information from remote sensing images, the widespread presence of mixed pixels significantly reduces the accuracy and reliability of land cover identification. Interfering surface features such as vegetation, water bodies, shadows, and fluvial sediments can severely affect the effectiveness of alteration anomaly detection. Therefore, to accurately identify the spectral signatures of useful endmembers, it is essential to perform spectral mixture analysis on the imagery. This process helps to minimize or eliminate the influence of interfering land cover types, improve spectral discrimination accuracy, and ultimately enhance the extraction of alteration information [30].
Complex and irregular phenomena in nature often follow inherent scale-invariant laws. Based on this principle, Mandelbrot introduced the concept of fractal theory in 1983 [31]. As an effective method for quantitatively describing irregular shapes and spatial patterns, fractal theory has been widely applied to studying natural phenomena and complex systems [32,33,34]. This theory enables the extraction of deterministic and regular parameters from seemingly chaotic patterns, allowing the reconstruction of formation mechanisms of fractal structures and the inference of system evolution from stochastic processes. Many geological phenomena and spatial distributions in Earth systems exhibit pronounced fractal characteristics, particularly those associated with hydrothermal mineralization processes such as magma generation, migration, and intrusion, which often display varying degrees of self-similarity. On this basis, fractal theory serves as a powerful tool for identifying and extracting remote sensing-based alteration anomalies, thereby revealing the spatial organization and evolutionary patterns of mineralization. In recent years, fractal-based methods have been widely employed by researchers worldwide for remote sensing anomaly extraction and mineral exploration [35,36,37,38,39].
The Saga region of Tibet is situated in a key segment of central-western India–Eurasia continental collision zone. It spans three major tectonic units from north to south: the Gangdese forearc basin, the Yarlung Zangbo suture zone, and the North Himalaya Tethyan fold–thrust belt. Although the area is characterized by a complex lithostratigraphic framework shaped by multiple phases of superimposed tectonic-magmatic activity, its high-altitude terrain, rugged topography, and limited accessibility pose significant challenges to field-based geological investigations. Against this backdrop, how to efficiently identify alteration anomalies associated with mineralization through remote sensing techniques under conditions where fieldwork is constrained has become a critical scientific question in current mineral exploration efforts in the Saga region. In this context, the present study focuses on the Saga region of Tibet. It employs Level-2A Sentinel-2 imagery to extract remote sensing alteration anomalies, including iron-staining, Al–OH, Mg–OH, and carbonate anomalies by the method of “resampling + mixed pixel decomposition + principal component analysis + mixing ratio + threshold segmentation” in this region. Furthermore, the fractal dimensions of the various alteration anomalies were calculated using fractal theory, enabling the characterization of their spatial distribution patterns and fractal structural features across the study area. Two potential areas have been identified using the composite contour map of fractal dimensions of alteration anomalies obtained from the superimposed analysis of various remotely sensed alteration anomalies. The remote sensing extraction and spatial structure analysis approach developed in this study provides not only a technical solution for mineral prediction in high-altitude and logistically inaccessible regions but also offers theoretical support for the quantitative modeling of alteration anomalies in structurally complex areas. This methodology holds significant theoretical and practical value for mineral exploration in challenging terrains.

2. Overview of the Study Area

2.1. Geological Profile

The study area is characterized by a diverse and extensively distributed set of stratigraphic units, mainly comprising Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic formations. The Paleozoic strata are primarily exposed in the northern part of the region, whereas the Mesozoic and Cenozoic units are widely distributed across the entire area. The Paleozoic sequence includes the Silurian–Ordovician Dajiling Formation, dominated by quartz schist and quartz sandstone, with a mineral assemblage of quartz, feldspar, and minor mica, and characterized by sericitization, malachite alteration and limonitization (Table 1); the Ziqu Formation, consisting mainly of marble and quartz schist, with common calcite and quartz, and alteration features such as chloritization and hematitization; the Permian Zhongba Formation, composed predominantly of dolomite, where calcite is the principal mineral and silicification and limonitization are locally developed; the Gangzhutang Formation, dominated by phyllitic slate, with a mineral assemblage of quartz and sericite, locally affected by sericitization and epidotization; and the Gazhale Formation, composed of phyllite and phyllitic slate, commonly containing quartz, feldspar, and sericite, and pervasively affected by hydrothermal alteration, including sericitization and limonitization. The Mesozoic strata are relatively complex. Triassic units include the Kagongyan Formation, composed mainly of basalt, with relict pyroxene and plagioclase, locally altered to chlorite and sericite; the Yaqu and Niuku Formations, dominated by shale and quartz sandstone, with a mineral assemblage of quartz and clay minerals, and alteration features such as chloritization and limonitization; the Tunjuri Formation, consisting of phyllite and limestone, with common quartz and calcite, and locally affected by sericitization and limonitization; the Jipuyan Formation, dominated by gabbro and diabase, where primary minerals such as olivine, pyroxene, and plagioclase are present, the latter frequently altered to sericite, illite, or chlorite, accompanied by hematite and goethite formation; the Jiabula Formation, composed mainly of sandstone and limestone, with quartz and calcite, and characterized by silicification and limonitization; the Angren Formation, dominated by quartz sandstone, primarily composed of quartz, with associated sericitization and limonitization; the Chuangde Formation, consisting of quartz sandstone and shale, with quartz and clay minerals and local limonitization; and the Zongzhuo Formation, composed mainly of quartz sandstone, retaining quartz and feldspar relics, and featuring alteration products such as sericite and epidote. The Cretaceous strata include the Zezuweng Formation, composed of phyllite and slate, with quartz and mica, and commonly affected by sericitization and chloritization; the Dasangyan Formation, consisting of shale and quartz sandstone, with quartz and clay minerals and associated limonitization; and the Danga Formation, dominated by quartz sandstone, composed primarily of quartz and locally silicified. The Cenozoic strata are mainly represented by Quaternary alluvial deposits (Qh) (Figure 1). In addition, intrusive rocks are widely distributed in the region, including Neogene monzogranite and Cretaceous diabase. The monzogranite is primarily composed of quartz, K-feldspar, and plagioclase, commonly affected by sericitization and limonitization. The diabase contains pyroxene and plagioclase, and is frequently subjected to chloritization, hematitization, and goethitization. Hydrothermal alteration and mineralization are well developed throughout the region, with common features including malachite alteration, epidotization, chloritization, sericitization, hematitization, and limonitization.

2.2. Overview of Remote Sensing Data

The Sentinel-2 satellite [40,41,42,43], part of the European Union’s Copernicus Earth observation program, is equipped with a multispectral imager covering 13 spectral bands across the visible, near-infrared, and shortwave infrared regions. These bands offer spatial resolutions of 10 m, 20 m, and 60 m, respectively.
This study utilized Level-2A Sentinel-2 imagery acquired on 13 June 2024, with satisfactory overall data quality (Figure 2a). Although Level-2A products provide bottom-of-atmosphere reflectance data that have already undergone radiometric calibration and atmospheric correction, reconstruction of the low-resolution bands is still required during the image processing stage. In this study, the S2 Resampling tool provided by SNAP 11.0.0 software was employed to reconstruct the low-resolution Sentinel-2 bands to a spatial resolution of 10 m while preserving their spectral characteristics. For the subsequent spectral mixture analysis and remote sensing-based extraction of alteration anomalies, specific Sentinel-2 bands were excluded based on their primary functions: Bands 1, 9, and 10 are mainly designed for coastal aerosol, cirrus clouds, and water vapor detection, respectively; additionally, Bands 8 and 8a have similar central wavelengths, but Band 8a is more sensitive to rock alteration. Therefore, ENVI software (ENVI 5.3, Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Boulder, CO, USA) was used in this study to synthesize Sentinel-2 imagery, excluding Bands 1, 8, 9, and 10, which are primarily designed for atmospheric corrections and thus not suitable for geological analysis. A masking procedure was applied to reduce non-geological interference, such as Quaternary sediments, snow, and rainfall in the study area. The resulting preprocessed Sentinel-2 image (Figure 2b) served as the basis for subsequent analysis in this study.

2.3. Overview of Spectral Data

In the process of geological mineral exploration, the presence of altered rocks in a region does not necessarily indicate mineralization. However, extensive and intense wall-rock alteration is typically associated with large or super-large ore deposits. There are notable differences in mineral composition and lithology between unaltered and altered rocks, which result in distinct variations in their reflectance spectral characteristics. These spectral differences form the theoretical basis for extracting alteration information through remote sensing. In the Saga area, various near-ore wall-rock alteration minerals are developed, including malachitization, epidotization, chloritization, sericitization, hematitization, and limonitization. These alteration minerals are generally rich in Fe3+, Fe2+, hydroxyl groups (OH), or carbonate groups (CO32−), which give rise to diagnostic spectral absorption features that reflect their mineralogical composition. These spectral features can serve as important indicators for remotely sensing alteration anomalies and delineating potential ore-targeting areas. This study utilizes the reflectance spectra of representative minerals from the USGS spectral library (Figure 3) to analyze the locations of diagnostic absorption features and to extract the corresponding alteration anomaly information for each key mineral [44].

3. Research Methods

3.1. Sequential Maximum Angle Convex Cone

Several models have been developed for spectral mixture analysis, among which the Linear Spectral Unmixing (LSU) model is the most widely applied due to its simplicity and ease of implementation [45]. The LSU technique separates the spectra of each remote sensing data image by utilizing the research results, such as the combination of feature spectra for the characteristics of the mixed image elements. In the linear model of mixed pixels, the gray value of any pixel in a given band reflects the co-reflections in that band from all places inside it, and its magnitude is linearly related to the area of the feature. The result of linear spectral separation is usually expressed as a series of gray-scale images of end-element spectra, also known as abundance images, in which the value of the image element indicates the proportion of the end-element spectra in the image element. The selection of end-elements is the prerequisite and key to the linear hybrid image decomposition method, and the type, number, and value of end-elements determine the success or failure of the hybrid image decomposition technique. The end elements are selected on the spectral image to represent the spectrum of the pure feature surface. The Sequential Maximum Angle Convex Cone (SMACC) method is a commonly used end-element extraction method for the Linear Spectral Unmixing model, which can simultaneously extract the end elements and their abundance proportion of each feature from the mixed image [46,47,48].
The SMACC model’s fundamental assumption is that a surface comprises a limited number of spectral endmembers. In a three-dimensional data cube representing remote sensing imagery—consisting of spatial dimensions (x-axis and y-axis) and spectral bands—the number of spectral bands is denoted by L, and the number of spectral endmembers by p. Each pixel within this cube can be interpreted as a vector in an L-dimensional spectral space, with each dimension corresponding to a specific spectral band. Thus, the spectral signature of each pixel is expressed as a linear combination of p spectral endmember vectors. Consequently, the original remote sensing image data can be mathematically described by:
R i = k = 1 N M i k S k + ε i ,   i = 1 ,   2 , , L
In this equation, Mik denotes the reflectance of the k-th endmember at the i-th spectral band, and Sk represents the fractional abundance of the k-th endmember, with the abundance vector defined as a = {a1, a2, , aₚ}. The noise term εi captures additive random disturbances in the remotely sensed image data [49,50].
There are two assumptions about the endmembers: nonnegativity and sum-to-one. Mixing matrix M and abundance matrix S are required for nonnegativity (a ≥ 0), and the sum-to-one constraint is used for the pixel fraction. The sum of all endmembers in a single pixel is one, i.e., ∑q=1ps(q) = 1. The simplex is represented as Sx = {xRL: x = , α ≥ 0, ∑q=1ps(q) = 1.} when Noise is zero, and the simplex shape is like a convex cone Cp = {r ∈ RL: r = MS, α ≥ 0, ∑q=1ps(q) = 1, γ ≥ 0} [49,50].
As illustrated in Figure 4, the algorithm operates within the simplex Sx (where γ = 1), defined by a convex combination of spectral signatures. In the first iteration, the data points are projected in the direction of f1, which emphasizes the contribution of the first endmember ma. The resulting projection identifies ma as the extreme point in that direction. In the second iteration, the data are re-projected along a new orthogonal direction, f2, allowing the algorithm to extract the second endmember mb. This iterative procedure continues, projecting the residual data in successively orthogonal directions until no additional distinct endmembers can be found.

3.2. Box-Counting Fractal Method

Mandelbrot introduced the concept of “fractal theory” in 1983. Fractal theory has experienced widespread application and continuous innovation within the quantitative analysis domain of Earth sciences [51,52,53]. Alteration anomalies derived from remote sensing imagery typically exhibit complex and irregular spatial patterns, rendering traditional Euclidean geometry methods inadequate for accurately characterizing their spatial distribution. However, these alteration anomalies often display pronounced fractal self-similarity as an intrinsic feature. Therefore, fractal theory can effectively quantify the spatial self-similarity of alteration anomalies by calculating their fractal dimensions, providing a robust measure for characterizing the complexity of their spatial distributions. Several approaches have been developed for calculating fractal dimensions, including box-counting dimension (capacity dimension) [54,55], information dimension [56,57], similarity dimension [58,59], correlation dimension [60,61], and Hausdorff dimension [62,63]. Among these, the box-counting dimension method has become the most widely adopted approach due to its straightforward theoretical foundation and computational simplicity.
The implementation of the box-counting method involves overlaying the study area with a two-dimensional square grid of varying box sizes (side length = r) and counting the number of boxes, N(r), that contain alteration anomaly information at each scale. The relationship between the number of boxes N(r) and box size r follows a power-law distribution, as expressed by Eq:
N(r) = CrD
where C is a constant, and D is the box dimension subdimensional value. Take the logarithm of each side of the above equation:
lnN(r) = −Dlnr + lnc
Based on Equation (2), a log r − log N(r) plot is constructed and fitted using the least-squares method. The slope of the fitted line represents the box-counting fractal dimension, while the coefficient of determination (R2) is used to evaluate the goodness of fit. An R2 value closer to 1 indicates a better fit and stronger agreement between the data and the power-law model. In this study, the fractal dimensions of remote sensing-derived alteration anomalies in the study area were calculated using the box-counting method described above, and corresponding fractal dimension contour maps were subsequently generated. The specific procedures are as follows: first, an initial observational scale (r) was defined, and two-dimensional orthogonal grids with side lengths of r = r0, r0/2, r0/4, and r0/8 were used to overlay the study area (Figure 5) sequentially. For each scale, the number of grid cells N(r) containing alteration anomaly information was recorded. Next, a log-log plot of r versus N(r) was constructed, and the box dimension (D), along with its coefficient of determination (R2), was obtained through least-squares linear regression. This approach enabled a quantitative characterization and evaluation of the spatial distribution of remote sensing alteration anomalies.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Spectral Mixture Analysis

The preprocessed imagery was first subjected to Minimum Noise Fraction (MNF) transformation using ENVI software to perform noise reduction and dimensionality reduction, after which the SMACC method was applied to extract endmember spectra and abundance information. The processed imagery was decomposed into abundance images corresponding to nine distinct land-cover endmembers (Figure 6) and one shadow image, with the total abundance summing to one. Additionally, spectral vectors were generated for each of the nine endmember components (Table 2). In the experiment, these nine endmember spectral vectors were compared and identified against standard spectra from a reference spectral library. By combining this spectral comparison with their spatial distribution patterns in the abundance images, endmember component 3 was identified as vegetation, while endmember components 4 and 6 were classified as other interference features.
After determining the reflectance and abundance values of vegetation and interfering endmembers, spectral unmixing was performed for each spectral band using a linear mixture decomposition model. Taking Band 2 (B2) as an example, the abundance values of the identified interfering endmembers 3, 4, and 6 (denoted as F3, F4, and F6) were multiplied by their respective spectral reflectance values in B2 and summed to obtain a composite image representing the contribution of vegetation-related interference. This composite reflectance was subtracted from the original radiance value of B2 (DN2) to yield a reflectance image of the non-vegetation components. The resulting image was then divided by the proportion of the remaining abundance (1 − F3F4 − F6) to reconstruct the reflectance values of the rock and soil endmembers, thereby effectively removing the influence of interfering endmembers in this band. This process can be represented by the following equation:
D N L a s t = D N i j = 1 n D N i j F j 1 j 1 n D N i j F j
where DNLast denotes the reconstructed reflectance value of the pixel, i represents the band number, j is the endmember index, and Fj is the abundance value of the jth endmember. This method enables the compensation and reconstruction of rock and soil spectral components across all bands in the remote sensing imagery of the study area (Table 3). Following spectral mixture analysis, rocky terrain in sparsely vegetated mountainous areas became distinctly apparent. Additionally, in densely vegetated regions, the vegetation signal was effectively suppressed without excessive masking, thereby preserving alteration information on rock surfaces and enhancing the reliability of subsequent alteration anomaly extraction in this study.

4.2. Remote Sensing Alteration Anomaly Information Extraction

According to previous studies, PCA and band ratio methods are commonly utilized to extract remote sensing alteration information. In this study, PCA was applied to identify alteration anomalies associated with iron-staining and hydroxyl-bearing minerals (Al–OH and Mg–OH), based on their characteristic spectral absorption features (Table 4). Additionally, the band ratio method was employed to detect carbonate alteration anomalies by exploiting the distinct reflectance characteristics of carbonate minerals in Bands 7 and 12.
Iron-stained minerals (such as hematite, limonite, and goethite) exhibit characteristic absorption features in the spectral ranges of 0.48–0.51 μm and 0.85–0.89 μm, which correspond to Band 2 and Band 8A of Sentinel-2 imagery. Additionally, they display strong reflectance features in the ranges of 0.65–0.70 μm and 1.52–1.70 μm, corresponding to Band 4 and Band 11, respectively. Therefore, Bands 2, 4, 8A, and 11 were selected as the optimal band combination for extracting iron-staining alteration anomalies. The principal component associated with this anomaly is characterized by Band 2 and Band 8A having contribution coefficients with the same sign and both being negative. Analysis of the transformed principal component eigenvectors indicates that information related to iron-staining anomalies is primarily concentrated in the third principal component (PC3). As such, PC3 was selected as the principal component for extracting iron-staining alteration information.
OH group alteration minerals primarily include Al–OH minerals (such as kaolinite, muscovite, and alunite) and Mg–OH minerals (such as chlorite, epidote). Al–OH minerals exhibit reflective spectral features in the wavelength range of 1.60–1.70 μm, corresponding to Sentinel-2 Band 11, and absorption features near 2.20 μm, corresponding to Sentinel-2 Band 12. Consequently, Bands 6, 8a, 11, and 12 were selected as the optimal band combination for identifying Al–OH mineral alteration anomalies. PCA has then performed using these selected bands (Bands 6, 8a, 11, and 12). The principal component related to Al–OH anomalies shows positive and identical contribution coefficients for Bands 8a and 11, while Bands 11 and 12 exhibit opposite signs. Examination of the transformed eigenvectors indicated that the inverse of principal component 4 (–PC4) best matched these criteria (Table 3). Therefore, –PC4 was utilized as the principal component for extracting Al–OH mineral alteration anomalies in this study.
Mg–OH minerals exhibit an increasing reflectance trend in the wavelength range of 0.70–1.82 μm, corresponding to Bands 5–11 of Sentinel-2 imagery, and display characteristic absorption near 2.32 μm, corresponding to Sentinel-2 Band 12. Accordingly, Bands 2, 8a, 11, and 12 were selected as the optimal band combination for extracting Mg–OH mineral alteration anomalies. In the PCA, the principal component associated with Mg–OH anomalies typically show positive and identical coefficient signs for Bands 2 and 11 and opposite signs for Bands 11 and 12. Based on these criteria, eigenvector PC3 was selected as the principal component for identifying Mg–OH mineral alteration anomalies.
Carbonate minerals (such as calcite and dolomite) typically exhibit prominent reflectance peaks around 0.7–0.8 μm and 1.7–1.8 μm, corresponding to Bands 7 and 12 of Sentinel-2 imagery, respectively. Based on multiple experimental analyses, a hybrid band ratio method using Band 12/Band 8a and Band 7/Band 4 was adopted in this study. This mixed-ratio approach enhances the diagnostic spectral signatures of carbonate minerals, thereby effectively extracting associated alteration anomaly information.
After extracting the characteristic principal components or hybrid band-ratio images representing the four alteration types, we calculated the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the alteration-type images. Pixels with values greater than μ + Nσ were classified as remote-sensing alteration anomalies. The multiplier N was set to 3 for iron-staining, Al–OH and Mg–OH anomalies, and 2 for carbonate anomalies (Table 5). The final Sentinel-2 alteration anomaly map is shown in Figure 7.

4.3. Characterization of Alteration Anomalies in Remote Sensing Using Fractal Dimensions

The fractal dimension provides a useful indicator for locating ore deposits. In this study, box-counting fractal analysis was applied to four alteration-anomaly layers derived from Sentinel-2 imagery: iron staining, Al–OH, Mg–OH, and carbonate. This analysis aimed to pinpoint the most promising mineralization sites in the study area and provide theoretical guidance for future exploration efforts. Four two-dimensional orthogonal grids with cell sizes of 6.123 km, 3.062 km, 1.531 km, and 0.765 km were successively superimposed on the study area (Figure 5). For each grid scale, the number of square cells N(r) containing the respective alteration anomaly was recorded. The natural logarithm of cell size, ln r, was plotted on the x-axis and ln N(r) on the y-axis; least-squares regression lines were then fitted separately for each alteration type. The slope of each regression line yields the box-counting dimension D. The statistical results are summarized in Table 6, and the ln N(r)–ln r regression plots are shown in Figure 8.
Using the fractal method described above, fractal dimensions for each alteration type were calculated over the scale range of 0.765–6.123 km. The results are as follows: the iron-staining anomalies have an overall fractal dimension of 1.59541 with R2 = 0.9968; the Al–OH anomalies, 1.47198 with R2 = 0.9921; the Mg–OH anomalies, 1.50074 with R2 = 0.9916; and the carbonate anomalies, 1.12053 with R2 = 0.9925. The highest fractal dimension value of the iron-stained alteration in the study area indicates significant spatial structural complexity. This complexity may be closely related to mineralization centers formed by the oxidation of metal sulfides or the intersection of fracture sites. It is presumed to be a result of the main metallogenic period. Therefore, areas with high-D zones should be prioritized as core targets for exploration. The similar fractal dimensions of the Al–OH and Mg–OH anomalies imply comparable spatial complexities, likely reflecting different stages of the same mineralizing system; high-D areas delineate the probable boundaries of this system. By contrast, the lower fractal dimension of the carbonate anomalies points to a more uniform spatial distribution characteristic of peripheral or late-stage alteration zones. All alteration types exhibit R2 > 0.99, confirming pronounced statistical self-similarity within the selected scale domain.
The fractal dimension statistics of the previously described division grid were calculated to determine the fractal dimension value of the etching anomalies within each grid range. Each grid was assigned a fractal dimension value based on its center. Using Surfer 23 software, the Kriging interpolation method was then employed to create contour maps depicting the various alteration anomalies. The resulting contour map illustrates the fractal dimension information for different alteration anomalies, as shown in Figure 9.
Overall, the fractal characteristics of the different alteration anomalies reveal their spatial complexity and genetic mechanisms. When combined with the spatial coupling between each alteration type and existing mineralization sites, these features constitute a valuable basis for regional prospecting, offering scientific support for identifying potential mineralization targets. To integrate the fractal-dimension contour maps of the various alteration types in the Saga area, we normalized each dataset to prevent the spatial characteristics of any one alteration type from being masked by large absolute values during a simple arithmetic overlay. This normalization effectively eliminated the problem of subdued anomaly zones in the composite layer that would otherwise arise from disproportionately high values in a single alteration map. The resulting composite fractal-dimension contour map shows that high-value zones are concentrated mainly within the Silurian–Ordovician Dajiling Formation and the Jurassic Zongzhuo Formation, exhibiting a conspicuous concentric-diffusion pattern. Based on the distribution of previously identified mineralization sites, areas with composite fractal values exceeding 0.7 were designated as high-potential mineralization zones, and two additional prospective targets were delineated outside the known mineralization sites (Figure 10).

4.4. Results of Field Survey and Laboratory Analysis

Field geological investigations coupled with laboratory mineralogical analyses are critical for validating remote sensing interpretation results. Based on the interpreted remote sensing anomaly data, systematic field geological route surveys and laboratory-based mineralogical characterizations were carried out in the prospective metallogenic area I. The Dagiling Formation constitutes the primary strata in this area (Figure 10). Field investigations identified several quartz vein outcrops near regions of remote sensing high-value anomalies, displaying evident alteration characteristics, including prominent malachitization and chalcopyrite mineralization on the surface of some quartz veins. Collected quartz vein samples were subsequently prepared into thin sections and examined under transmitted and reflected light microscopy, revealing diverse mineralization types such as copper mineralization (Figure 11a), malachitization (Figure 11b), sericitization (Figure 11c), pyritization (Figure 11d), limonitization (Figure 11e), and galena mineralization (Figure 11f). Structurally, the rocks exhibit brecciated, veined, stockwork, disseminated veinlet, and massive textures, with disseminated veinlet, densely disseminated, and brecciated textures being the most common. Disseminated veinlets and densely disseminated structures predominantly occur in stratiform-like ore bodies, whereas brecciated structures mainly develop in vein-type ore bodies. Additionally, disseminated limonitization, chloritization, and speckled limonitization are evident in foliated marbles, with banded limonitization aligning along foliation observed locally. These field observations and microscopic results closely align with the lithological characteristics of the Dagiling Formation previously analyzed in the remote sensing anomaly regions. The loosely structured, highly fractured nature and abundance of easily altered minerals in the Dagiling Formation facilitate hydrothermal fluid infiltration, migration, and mineralization, leading to the accumulation of multiple alteration anomalies identified. These validation findings not only confirm the reliability of the remote sensing methodology applied in this study but also provide essential groundwork for subsequent verification studies in other prospective metallogenic areas.

5. Conclusions

  • Introducing spectral mixture analysis into the study area enables the separation of reflectance and abundance values for the various interference components contained in mixed pixels. Spectral unmixing and endmember reconstruction enhance the detectability of subtle mineralization-related alteration anomalies in the remote-sensing imagery. By accurately quantifying the spectral contribution of each surface feature, this approach prevents the loss of alteration signatures that often occurs with conventional masking techniques due to over-correction, and it markedly improves both the accuracy and completeness of alteration information extraction under diverse surface-cover conditions.
  • The fractal dimensions of the various remote-sensing alteration anomalies were determined using fractal analysis, thereby quantitatively characterizing their spatial self-similarity. The iron-staining anomalies have a fractal dimension of 1.59541 with R2 = 0.9968; the Al–OH anomalies, 1.47198 with R2 = 0.9921; the Mg–OH anomalies, 1.50074 with R2 = 0.9916; and the carbonate anomalies, 1.12053 with R2 = 0.9925. Notably, all alteration types exhibit R2 values greater than 0.99, confirming that the alteration anomalies in the study area display pronounced statistical self-similarity within the selected scale range.
  • The high-potential mineralization zones delineated in the fractal-dimension contour map of alteration anomalies shows a strong spatial correspondence with known mineralization sites. In addition, two new prospective zones were identified on the periphery of the existing mineralization sites. These findings furnish a sound theoretical basis and clear exploration priorities for the next stage of prospecting in the study area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Q.; methodology, K.Q.; software, K.Q. and S.D.; validation, K.Q. and J.K.; formal analysis, K.Q. and T.L.; investigation, K.Q., L.Q. and Z.R.; resources, Z.R. and S.G.; data curation, K.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and S.D.; visualization, K.Q., L.Q. and S.D.; supervision, T.L. and Y.H.; project administration, T.L.; funding acquisition, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by China Geological Survey Project (DD20240014, DD20243088), Ministry of Natural Resources’ new round of scientific and technological support project for finding mineral breakthroughs (ZKKJ202427-03), Tibet Science and Technology Program Projects (XZ202401YD0006-07).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yiwen Liu was employed by the Liaoning Datang International Shendong Thermal Power Co., Ltd. Author Jingui Kong was employed by Shandong Provincial Nuclear Industry Geological Group. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Crowley, J.K. Near-infrared reflectance of zunyite; implications for field mapping and remote-sensing detection of hydrothermally altered high alumina rocks. Econ. Geol. 1984, 79, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, C.; Jia, H.K.; Dong, L.F.; Zhao, H.S.; Zhao, M.H. Selection of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) Optimal Band Combinations for Mapping Alteration Zones. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Corrêa da Costa, M.A.; Carneiro Naleto, J.L.; Perrotta, M.M.; Soares Monteiro, L.V.; de Souza Filho, C.R. Visible-Near Infrared–Short-Wave Infrared Spectroscopy and Mineral Mapping of Hydrothermal Alteration Zones at the Brejuí W-Mo Skarn Deposit, Seridó Mobile Belt, Borborema Province, Brazil. Econ. Geol. 2024, 119, 1171–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Asadzadeh, S.; Chabrillat, S.; Cudahy, T.; Rashidi, B.; de Souza Filho, C.R. Alteration Mineral Mapping of the Shadan Porphyry Cu-Au Deposit (Iran) Using Airborne Imaging Spectroscopic Data: Implications for Exploration Drilling. Econ. Geol. 2024, 119, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Habashi, J.; Oskouei, M.M.; Moghadam, H.J.; Pour, A.B. Optimizing alteration mineral detection: A fusion of multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing techniques in the Sar-e-Chah-e Shur, Iran. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2024, 35, 101249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, Q.; Yan, Y.; Tonai, S.; Dilek, Y.; Zhu, Z.F. Timing of India-Asia collision and significant coupling between them around 51 Ma: Insights from the activation history of the Zhongba-Gyangze thrust in southern Tibet. Geology 2024, 52, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, B.; Tang, J.X.; Tang, P.; Beaudoin, G.; Laflamme, C.; Li, F.Q.; Zheng, W.B.; Song, Y.; Qi, J.; Sun, M.; et al. Multipulsed Magmatism and Duration of the Hydrothermal System of the Giant Jiama Porphyry Cu System, Tibet, China. Econ. Geol. 2024, 119, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, M.L.; Bi, X.W.; Hu, R.Z.; Chiaradia, M.; Zhu, J.J.; Xu, L.L.; Yang, Z.Y. Linking Porphyry Cu Formation to Tectonic Change in Postsubduction Settings: A Case Study from the Giant Yulong Belt, Eastern Tibet. Econ. Geol. 2024, 119, 279–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, X.F.; Gan, F.P.; Li, N.; Zhang, S.F.; Li, T.T. Mineral mapping in the Duolong porphyry and epithermal ore district, Tibet, using the Gaofen-5 satellite hyperspectral remote sensing data. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 151, 105222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bai, L.Y.; Dai, J.J.; Song, Y.; Liu, Z.B.; Chen, W.; Wang, N.; Wu, C.Y. Predictive Prospecting Using Remote Sensing in a Mountainous Terrestrial Volcanic Area, in Western Bangongco–Nujiang Mineralization Belt, Tibet. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fu, Y.F.; Cheng, Q.M.; Jing, L.H.; Ye, B.; Fu, H.Z. Mineral Prospectivity Mapping of Porphyry Copper Deposits Based on Remote Sensing Imagery and Geochemical Data in the Duolong Ore District, Tibet. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carvalho, M.; Cardoso-Fernandes, J.; González, F.J.; Teodoro, A.C. Comparative Performance of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-9 DataforRawMaterials’ Exploration OnshoreandinCoastal Areas. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baid, S.; Tabit, A.; Algouti, A.; Algouti, A.; Aboulfaraj, A.; Ezzahzi, S.; Kabili, S.; Elkhounaijiri, H. Integrating geochemical insights and remote sensing for enhanced identification of hydrothermal alterations in the Igoudrane region, Anti-Atlas, Morocco. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2024, 218, 105368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdelkader, M.A.; Watanabe, Y.; Shebl, A.; Badawi, M.; Dawoud, M.; El-Dokouny, H.A.; Csámer, Á.; Abdellatif, M. Advanced exploration of rare metal mineralization through integrated remote sensing and geophysical analysis of structurally-controlled hydrothermal alterations. J. Geochem. Explor. 2024, 267, 107598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mbianya, G.N.; Ngnotue, T.; Wambo, J.D.T.; Ganno, S.; Pour, A.B.; Kenne, P.A.; Fossi, S.H.; Wolf, I.D. Remote sensing satellite-based structural/alteration mapping for gold exploration in the Ketté goldfield, Eastern Cameroon. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2021, 184, 104386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abedini, M.; Ziaii, M.; Timkin, T.; Pour, A.B. Machine Learning (ML)-Based Copper Mineralization Prospectivity Mapping (MPM) Using Mining Geochemistry Method and Remote Sensing Satellite Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hegab, M.A.E.-R. A multi-disciplinary approach for uranium exploration using remote sensing and airborne gamma-ray spectrometry data in the Gebel Duwi area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 19739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, H.Q.; Zhao, X.S. Nonlinear unmixing of minerals based on the log and continuum removal model. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 52, 277–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Q.; Cai, D.Y.; Xia, J.S.; Zeng, M.; Yang, H.Y.; Zhang, R.S.; He, Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Chen, Y.; Xu, X.H.; et al. Remote sensing identification of hydrothermal alteration minerals in the Duobuza porphyry copper mining area in Tibet using WorldView-3 and GF-5 data: The impact of spatial and spectral resolution. Ore Geol. Rev. 2025, 180, 106573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Q.; Zhao, Z.F.; Zhou, J.X.; Zhu, R.F.; Xia, J.S.; Sun, T.; Zhao, X.; Chao, J.Q. ASTER and GF-5 Satellite Data for Mapping Hydrothermal Alteration Minerals in the Longtoushan Pb-Zn Deposit, SW China. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, S.H.; Tian, S.F. Extraction of Alteration Information from Hyperspectral Data Base on Kernel Extreme Learning Machine. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, Z.L.; Zhai, Q.P.; Sun, L. A Novel Method for Hyperspectral Mineral Mapping Based on Clustering-Matching and Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ghoneim, S.M.; Ali, H.F.; Abdelrahman, K.; Fnais, M.S.; Lala, A.M.S. Integrating remote sensing and geophysical data for mapping potential gold mineralization localities at Abu Marawat area, central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 18273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yao, F.J.; Liu, S.B.; Wang, D.H.; Geng, X.X.; Wang, C.H.; Jiang, N.; Wang, Y.K. Review on the development of multi- and hyperspectral remote sensing technology for exploration of copper-gold deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 162, 105732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sikakwe, G.U. Mineral exploration employing drones, contemporary geological satellite remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) procedures: A review. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2023, 31, 100988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, C.J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.B.; Liu, X.F.; Tang, J. Detecting mineralization via white mica spectral footprints: From field-based sampling to satellite hyperspectral remote sensing. Ore Geol. Rev. 2025, 181, 106588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naceur, M.S.; Loghmari, M.A.; Boussema, M.R. The contribution of the sources separation method in the decomposition of mixed pixels. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 2642–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miao, L.D.; Qi, H.R.; Szu, H. A maximum entropy approach to unsupervised mixed-pixel decomposition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2007, 16, 1008–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hosseinjani, M.; Tangestani, M.H. Mapping alteration minerals using sub-pixel unmixing of ASTER data in the Sarduiyeh area, SE Kerman, Iran. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2011, 4, 487–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharifi, A.; Hosseingholizadeh, M.H. Validation of extracted endmembers from hyperspectral images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 42, 989–992. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; WH Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 17–179. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cheng, Q.M. The perimeter-area fractal model and its application to geology. Math. Geol. 1995, 27, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kong, F.C.; Ding, G.Y. The implications the fractal dimension values of lineaments. Earthquake 1991, 5, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zuo, R.G.; Wang, J.L. ArcFractal: An ArcGIS add-in for processing geoscience data using fractal/ multifractal models. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, T.; Li, H.; Wu, K.X.; Chen, L.K.; Liu, W.M.; Hu, Z.J. Fractal and multifractal characteristics of regional fractures in Tongling metallogenic Area. Nonferrous Met. Eng. 2018, 8, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, Z.H.; Han, L.; Du, C.Y.; Cao, H.Y.; Guo, J.H.; Wang, H.Y. Fractal and Multifractal Characteristics of Lineaments in the Qianhe Graben and Its Tectonic Significance Using Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Z.; Qiao, K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, C.L. Geochemical Data Mining by Integrated Multivariate Component Data Analysis: The Heilongjiang Duobaoshan Area (China) Case Study. Minerals 2022, 12, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, F.W.; Hu, J.H.; Yang, Y.N.; Xiao, H.X.; Ma, F.C. Cross-Scale Study on Lime Modified Phosphogypsum Cemented Backfill by Fractal Theory. Minerals 2022, 12, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, J.; Zhao, Z.H.; Yang, Y.J.; Li, C.L.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, N.; Tian, J.W.; Li, H.N. Metallogenic prediction based on fractal theory and machine learning in Duobaoshan Area, Heilongjiang Province. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 168, 106030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Forouzan, M.; Arfania, R. Integration of the bands of ASTER, OLI, MSI remote sensing sensors for detection of hydrothermal alterations in southwestern area of the Ardestan, Isfahan Province, Central Iran. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2020, 23, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khashaba, S.M.A.; El-Shibiny, N.H.; Hassan, S.M.; Takazawa, E.; Khedr, M.Z. Application of remote sensing data integration in detecting mineralized granitic zones: A case study of the Gabal Al-Ijlah Al-Hamra, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2023, 200, 104855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, G.; Zhao, Z.F.; Zhang, X.L.; Wu, X.T.; Zheng, Y.F.; Feng, L.X.; Huang, Z.Q. Comprehensive Multi-Source remote sensing data integration for enhanced mineralization alteration extraction and geological structure interpretation in the Lala region of Sichuan Province. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 168, 106032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ding, H.F.; Jing, L.H.; Xi, M.J.; Bai, S.; Yao, C.Y.; Li, L. Research on Scale Improvement of Geochemical Exploration Based on Remote Sensing Image Fusion. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kokaly, R.F.; Clark, R.N.; Swayze, G.A.; Livo, K.E.; Hoefen, T.M.; Pearson, N.C.; Wise, R.A.; Benzel, W.; Lowers, H.A.; Driscoll, R.L.; et al. USGS Spectral Library Version 7; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, H.C.; Zhang, Y.N.; Duan, F. A robust and fast geometry based unmixing algorithm for hyperspectral imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 5481–5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Filippi, A.M.; Güneralp, İ.; Castillo, C.R.; Ma, A.; Paulus, G.; Anders, K.H. Comparison of Image Endmember- and Object-Based Classification of Very-High-Spatial-Resolution Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Narrow-Band Images for Mapping Riparian Forests and Other Land Covers. Land 2022, 11, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hamedianfar, A.; Laakso, K.; Middleton, M.; Törmänen, T.; Köykkä, J.; Torppa, J. Leveraging High-Resolution Long-Wave Infrared Hyperspectral Laboratory Imaging Data for Mineral Identification Using Machine Learning Methods. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thompson, D.R.; Mandrake, L.; Gilmore, M.S.; Castano, R. Superpixel endmember detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2010, 48, 4023–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gruninger, J.H.; Ratkowski, A.J.; Hoke, M.L. The Sequential Maximum Angle Convex Cone (SMACC) Endmember Model. In Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery X; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2004; Volume 5425, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen, J.; Bing, Z.B.; Mao, Z.X.; Zhang, C.P.; Bi, Z.W.; Yang, Z. Using geochemical data for prospecting target areas by the sequential maximum angle convex cone method in the Manzhouli area, China. Geochem. J. 2018, 52, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Qiu, J.T.; Zhang, C.; Hu, X. Integration of Concentration-Area Fractal Modeling and Spectral Angle Mapper for Ferric Iron Alteration Mapping and Uranium Exploration in the Xiemisitan Area, NW China. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 13878–13894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lyu, C.; Cheng, Q.M.; Zuo, R.G.; Wang, X.P. Mapping Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Lineaments Extracted from Remote Sensing Image Using Fractal and Multifractal Models. J. Earth Sci. 2017, 28, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Maghsoudi Moud, F.; van Ruitenbeek, F.; Hewson, R.; van der Meijde, M. An Approach to Accuracy Assessment of ASTER Derived Mineral Maps. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ni, C.Z.; Zhang, S.T.; Chen, Z.; Yan, Y.F.; Li, Y.J. Mapping the spatial distribution and characteristics of lineaments using fractal and multifractal models: A case study from Northeastern Yunnan Province, China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dinç Göğüş, Ö.; Avşar, E.; Develi, K.; Çalık, A. Quantifying the Rock Damage Intensity Controlled by Mineral Compositions: Insights from Fractal Analyses. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shi, R.; Xiao, H.G. Particle Flow Simulation of the Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behavior of Multi-Mineral Rock Models with Different Fractal Dimensions. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, T.; Feng, M.; Pu, W.B.; Liu, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, H.W.; Huang, J.Q.; Mao, L.T.; Wang, Z.Q. Fractal-Based Multi-Criteria Feature Selection to Enhance Predictive Capability of AI-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, Z.H.; Chen, J.; Cheng, B.B.; Liu, Y.W.; Qiao, K.; Cui, X.M.; Yin, Y.C.; Li, C.L. Spatial Analysis of Structure and Metal Mineralization Based on Fractal Theory and Fry Analysis: A Case Study in Nenjiang–Heihe Metallogenic Belt. Minerals 2023, 13, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cheng, L.; Wang, G.M.; Ma, Z.J.; Guo, H.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, J.; Fu, H.H. Self-similarity study based on the particle sizes of coal-series diatomite. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, Y.; Sun, T.; Wu, K.X.; Zhang, H.W.; Zhang, J.W.; Jiang, X.W.; Lin, Q.W.; Feng, M. Fractal-Based Pattern Quantification of Mineral Grains: A Case Study of Yichun Rare-Metal Granite. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, H.; Mukherjee, B.; Zuo, Y.J.; Roy, P.N.S.; Wu, Z.H.; Sun, W.J.B.; Zheng, L.L.; Pan, C.; Lin, J.Y. Fractal dimension used as a proxy to understand the spatial distribution for carlin-type gold deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 158, 105534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fernández-Martínez, M.; Sánchez-Granero, M.A. Fractal dimension for fractal structures: A Hausdorff approach revisited. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 409, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hummer, D.R. Fractal distribution of mineral species among the crystallographic point groups. Am. Miner. 2021, 106, 1574–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geological map of the Saga region.
Figure 1. Geological map of the Saga region.
Minerals 15 01047 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of Sentinel-2 image mask before (a) and after (b) in the Saga region.
Figure 2. Comparison of Sentinel-2 image mask before (a) and after (b) in the Saga region.
Minerals 15 01047 g002
Figure 3. Spectral reflectance curves of USGS spectral library [44] minerals: (a) iron-stained, (b) Al–OH, (c) Mg–OH, and (d) carbonate.
Figure 3. Spectral reflectance curves of USGS spectral library [44] minerals: (a) iron-stained, (b) Al–OH, (c) Mg–OH, and (d) carbonate.
Minerals 15 01047 g003
Figure 4. Model diagram of the SMACC algorithm (modified from the literature [49]).
Figure 4. Model diagram of the SMACC algorithm (modified from the literature [49]).
Minerals 15 01047 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagrams of fractal dimension scale division steps (r = 6.123 km).
Figure 5. Schematic diagrams of fractal dimension scale division steps (r = 6.123 km).
Minerals 15 01047 g005
Figure 6. Shows abundant images of each end element after SMACC decomposition (ai): end elements 1–9).
Figure 6. Shows abundant images of each end element after SMACC decomposition (ai): end elements 1–9).
Minerals 15 01047 g006
Figure 7. Alteration anomaly information maps in the Saga area: (a) Iron-stained, (b) Al-OH, (c) Mg-OH, and (d) carbonate anomalies.
Figure 7. Alteration anomaly information maps in the Saga area: (a) Iron-stained, (b) Al-OH, (c) Mg-OH, and (d) carbonate anomalies.
Minerals 15 01047 g007
Figure 8. ln N(r) versus ln r plots for estimating the fractal dimension of alteration anomalies in the Saga area: (a) Iron-stained, (b) Al-OH, (c) Mg-OH, and (d) carbonate.
Figure 8. ln N(r) versus ln r plots for estimating the fractal dimension of alteration anomalies in the Saga area: (a) Iron-stained, (b) Al-OH, (c) Mg-OH, and (d) carbonate.
Minerals 15 01047 g008
Figure 9. Fractional dimension contour maps of alteration anomalies in the Saga area: (a) Iron-stained, (b) Al-OH, (c) Mg-OH, and (d) carbonate. The fractal dimension contour maps for the various alteration types show that iron-staining anomalies are markedly stronger, in both magnitude and areal extent than the other alteration types, whereas the high-value zones for carbonate alteration are the least extensive and least intense. High fractal-dimension values for iron-staining, Al–OH, and Mg–OH anomalies are concentrated principally within the Silurian–Ordovician Dajiling Formation and the Jurassic Zongzhuo Formation. These strata are relatively unconsolidated, highly cracked, and rich in readily altered minerals, thereby providing favorable pathways and reactive sites for hydrothermal fluids. The lithologic and structural characteristics likely control the enrichment of the alteration anomalies in these units. Additionally, the anomalies of iron-staining, Al–OH, and Mg–OH shows a strong spatial relationship with most known sites of Cu and Fe mineralization; the deposits are generally found within their respective high-value zones. This coherence reflects intense hydrothermal activity and robust mineralization in the area. Accordingly, both the Dajiling and Zongzhuo formations provide favorable conditions for alteration development and represent the most prospective stratigraphic units for exploration. By contrast, carbonate-related alteration anomalies display high values only in limited portions of the Zongzhuo Formation and exhibit a comparatively weak spatial match with known mineralization points. This suggests that their predictive significance is limited and that they may indicate mineral potential only under specific structural settings or lithologic combinations.
Figure 9. Fractional dimension contour maps of alteration anomalies in the Saga area: (a) Iron-stained, (b) Al-OH, (c) Mg-OH, and (d) carbonate. The fractal dimension contour maps for the various alteration types show that iron-staining anomalies are markedly stronger, in both magnitude and areal extent than the other alteration types, whereas the high-value zones for carbonate alteration are the least extensive and least intense. High fractal-dimension values for iron-staining, Al–OH, and Mg–OH anomalies are concentrated principally within the Silurian–Ordovician Dajiling Formation and the Jurassic Zongzhuo Formation. These strata are relatively unconsolidated, highly cracked, and rich in readily altered minerals, thereby providing favorable pathways and reactive sites for hydrothermal fluids. The lithologic and structural characteristics likely control the enrichment of the alteration anomalies in these units. Additionally, the anomalies of iron-staining, Al–OH, and Mg–OH shows a strong spatial relationship with most known sites of Cu and Fe mineralization; the deposits are generally found within their respective high-value zones. This coherence reflects intense hydrothermal activity and robust mineralization in the area. Accordingly, both the Dajiling and Zongzhuo formations provide favorable conditions for alteration development and represent the most prospective stratigraphic units for exploration. By contrast, carbonate-related alteration anomalies display high values only in limited portions of the Zongzhuo Formation and exhibit a comparatively weak spatial match with known mineralization points. This suggests that their predictive significance is limited and that they may indicate mineral potential only under specific structural settings or lithologic combinations.
Minerals 15 01047 g009
Figure 10. Fractional dimensional contour map of the alteration anomaly in the Saga area.
Figure 10. Fractional dimensional contour map of the alteration anomaly in the Saga area.
Minerals 15 01047 g010
Figure 11. Field and photomicrographs showing representative mineralization features in quartz veins. (a) Chalcopyrite (Ccp) and pyrite (Py) developed in a quartz vein, photographed from a hand specimen; (b) Malachite (Mlc) alteration along a quartz vein, photographed from a hand specimen; (c) Sericite (Ser)–quartz (Qz) symbiosis observed in a sericitic quartz schist under cross-polarized light in a transmitted light thin section; (d,e) Coexisting pyrite (Py), limonite (Lm), and rutile (Rt) in quartz veins, observed in polished thin sections under reflected light microscopy; (f) Galena (Gn) in a quartz vein, observed under reflected light microscopy in a polished thin section.
Figure 11. Field and photomicrographs showing representative mineralization features in quartz veins. (a) Chalcopyrite (Ccp) and pyrite (Py) developed in a quartz vein, photographed from a hand specimen; (b) Malachite (Mlc) alteration along a quartz vein, photographed from a hand specimen; (c) Sericite (Ser)–quartz (Qz) symbiosis observed in a sericitic quartz schist under cross-polarized light in a transmitted light thin section; (d,e) Coexisting pyrite (Py), limonite (Lm), and rutile (Rt) in quartz veins, observed in polished thin sections under reflected light microscopy; (f) Galena (Gn) in a quartz vein, observed under reflected light microscopy in a polished thin section.
Minerals 15 01047 g011
Table 1. Correspondence table of major minerals and alteration characteristics of stratigraphic units in the Saga area.
Table 1. Correspondence table of major minerals and alteration characteristics of stratigraphic units in the Saga area.
FormationPrimary MineralsAlteration Minerals
Dajiling FormationQuartz, Plagioclase, MicaSericite, Limonite, malachite
Ziqu FormationCalcite, QuartzChlorite, Hematite
Zhongba FormationCalciteLimonite, Silicification
Gangzhutang FormationQuartz, MicaSericite, Epidote
Gazhale FormationQuartz, Plagioclase, MicaSericite, Limonite
Kagongyan FormationPyroxene, PlagioclaseSericite, Chlorite
Yaquyan FormationQuattez, Clay mineralsChlorite, Limonite
Niuku FormationsQuattez, Clay mineralsChlorite, Limonite
Tunjuri FormationCalcite, Quartz,Sericite, Limonite
Jipuyan FormationOlivine, Pyroxene, PlagioclaseSericite, Chlorite
Jiabula FormationCalcite, QuartzLimonite, Silicification
Angren FormationQuartzSericite, Limonite
Chuangde FormationQuattez, Clay mineralsLimonite
Zongzhuo FormationQuartz, PlagioclaseSericite, Epidote
Zezuweng FormationQuartz, MicaSericite, Chlorite
Dasangyan FormationQuattez, Clay mineralsLimonite
Danga FormationQuartzSilicification
Quaternary AlluviumQuartz, Feldspar fragmentsLimonite
Granite DiabaseQuartz, Feldspar Sericite, Limonite, Hematite
Table 2. Spectral vectors of nine endmember waveforms from remotely sensed images of the study area.
Table 2. Spectral vectors of nine endmember waveforms from remotely sensed images of the study area.
Band 2Band 3Band 4Band 5Band 6Band 7Band 8aBand 11Band 12
1491259486560667566766734680878936424
2651267126640565154535157478922672162
3344422562268343533673691431164606342
4167521902122277742594604492041813007
5657269166936463344484396420428532534
6385640124372364836184031427858256136
7244034324272454847024913498771466375
8452450925044578056385435497423111975
9214426362960308331333325348961165621
Table 3. Calculation formula for reconstructed images of the study area.
Table 3. Calculation formula for reconstructed images of the study area.
BandCalculation Formula
2(DN1 − F3 × 3444 − F4 × 1675 − F6 × 3856)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
3(DN2 − F3 × 2256 − F4 × 2190 − F6 × 4012)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
4(DN3 − F3 × 2268 − F4 × 2122 − F6 × 4372)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
5(DN4 − F3 × 3435 − F4 × 2777 − F6 × 3648)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
6(DN5 − F3 × 3367 − F4 × 4259 − F6 × 3618)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
7(DN6 − F3 × 3691 − F4 × 4604 − F6 × 4031)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
8a(DN7 − F3 × 4311 − F4 × 4920 − F6 × 4278)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
11(DN8 − F3 × 6460 − F4 × 4181 − F6 × 5825)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
12(DN9 − F3 × 6342 − F4 × 3007 − F6 × 6136)/(1 − F3 − F4 − F6)
Table 4. Table of principal component analysis eigenvectors of sentinel-2 imagery in the saga area.
Table 4. Table of principal component analysis eigenvectors of sentinel-2 imagery in the saga area.
TypeEigenvector Band 2Band 4Band 8ABand 11
Iron-stainingPC10.3136810.4785470.5173530.636351
PC20.6174180.3404680.160370−0.690767
PC3−0.5685800.785637−0.181369−0.163086
PC4−0.443977−0.1945490.820812−0.302163
TypeEigenvectorBand 6Band 8ABand 11Band 12
Al-OHPC1−0.480088−0.506195−0.516806−0.49618
PC20.4686440.504798−0.674377−0.26602
PC3−0.4196010.146771−0.4800540.756269
PC40.611411−0.68367−0.2183480.333311
TypeEigenvectorBand 2Band 8ABand 11Band 12
Mg-OHPC1−0.410902−0.526081−0.537109−0.515667
PC20.5710090.46045−0.619561−0.279426
PC30.543775−0.3622850.491561−0.575698
PC40.457622−0.61642−0.2933040.56972
Table 5. Statistical summary of alteration anomaly values for different alteration types in the Saga area.
Table 5. Statistical summary of alteration anomaly values for different alteration types in the Saga area.
TypeMeanStandard DeviationAnomaly Value
Iron-staining0114.79344.37
Al-OH070.09210.27
Mg-OH0140.50421.5
Carbonate1.31.354
Table 6. Statistical parameters for fractal dimension calculations of various alteration anomalies in the saga area.
Table 6. Statistical parameters for fractal dimension calculations of various alteration anomalies in the saga area.
TypeFractal DimensionTypeFractal Dimension
r/kmN(r)lnrLnN(r) r/kmN(r)lnrLnN(r)
Iron-
staining
6.123125.774553.46574Al-OH6.123115.429353.46574
3.062354.744934.158883.062334.605174.15888
1.5311153.555354.852031.5311003.496514.85203
0.7653222.484915.545180.7652282.39795.54518
Mg-OH6.123125.549083.46574Carbonate6.123104.615123.46574
3.062344.73624.158883.062244.007334.15888
1.5311143.526364.852031.531553.178054.85203
0.7652572.484915.545180.7651012.302595.54518
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, K.; Luo, T.; Ding, S.; Quan, L.; Kong, J.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Z.; Gong, S.; Huang, Y. Extraction of Remote Sensing Alteration Information Based on Integrated Spectral Mixture Analysis and Fractal Analysis. Minerals 2025, 15, 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15101047

AMA Style

Qiao K, Luo T, Ding S, Quan L, Kong J, Liu Y, Ren Z, Gong S, Huang Y. Extraction of Remote Sensing Alteration Information Based on Integrated Spectral Mixture Analysis and Fractal Analysis. Minerals. 2025; 15(10):1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15101047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Kai, Tao Luo, Shihao Ding, Licheng Quan, Jingui Kong, Yiwen Liu, Zhiwen Ren, Shisong Gong, and Yong Huang. 2025. "Extraction of Remote Sensing Alteration Information Based on Integrated Spectral Mixture Analysis and Fractal Analysis" Minerals 15, no. 10: 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15101047

APA Style

Qiao, K., Luo, T., Ding, S., Quan, L., Kong, J., Liu, Y., Ren, Z., Gong, S., & Huang, Y. (2025). Extraction of Remote Sensing Alteration Information Based on Integrated Spectral Mixture Analysis and Fractal Analysis. Minerals, 15(10), 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15101047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop