Next Article in Journal
Geochronology, Whole-Rock Geochemistry, and Sr–Nd–Hf Isotopes of Granitoids in the Tongshanling Ore Field, South China: Insights into Cu and W Metallogenic Specificity
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow CFD–PBM Model in a Micro–Nanobubble Generator
Previous Article in Journal
Practical Experience of Filtered Tailings Technology in Chile and Peru: An Environmentally Friendly Solution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flotation Performance and Adsorption Mechanism of a Novel Chelating Collector for Azurite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Temperature Flotation Separation of Diaspore from Kaolinite by Using a Mixed Collector

1
Ansteel Beijing Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102200, China
2
School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
3
Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Calcium-Containing Mineral Resources, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(7), 891; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070891
Submission received: 17 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 15 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress of Reagents in Minerals Flotation)

Abstract

:
In this paper, the effect of a new mixed collector sodium oleate (NaOl)/tert dodecyl mercaptan (TDM) on the separation of diaspore and kaolinite at 283 K was investigated. The molar ratio of NaOl to TDM is 8:2. The properties of the mixed collector and its adsorption mechanism on diaspore and kaolinite were studied by surface tension measurements, Zeta potential determinations and XPS analysis. The flotation results show that the mixed collector NaOl/TDM has a good collection ability for diaspore and a good selectivity for kaolinite at low temperatures. Therefore, the mixed collector NaOl/TDM can effectively separate diaspore and kaolinite under alkaline conditions at 283 K. The results of surface tension measurements show that the molecular density, hydrophobic association ability and collection ability of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM are better than those of the single collector at 283 K. In addition, the formation of a micelle effect of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM has a synergistic effect, which improves the reagent activity at low temperatures with the flotation effect enhanced. The results of the Zeta potential determinations and XPS analysis show that the total adsorption capacity of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM on the surface of the diaspore at low temperatures is higher than that of NaOl, and the adsorption capacity on the surface of kaolinite is similar to that of NaOl. The mixed collector NaOl/TDM may be adsorbed on the surface of diaspore and kaolinite by a hydrogen bond at 283 K.

1. Introduction

Diaspore-type bauxite is the main aluminum resource in China [1]. However, the mass ratio of Al2O3 to SiO2 (A/S) for this type of bauxite resource is only between 4–6, which has a difficult time meeting the raw material requirements (A/S > 10) for alumina production by the Bayer process [2]. Flotation can effectively separate diaspore and kaolinite, and improve A/S of this type of bauxite [3,4].
In recent years, many novel surfactants have been used in the direct flotation separation of diaspore and kaolinite [5], such as propyl gallate [6], hydroxamic acids [7], N-(6-(hydroxyamino)-6-oxohexyl) decanamide [8], cetyltrimethylammonium chloride [9] and so on. However, the oleic acid collector is still one of the most widely used collectors in bauxite flotation in China due to its excellent collection performance and low price [10,11,12]. However, the oleic acid collector also has obvious drawbacks [13]. Its sensitivity to temperature significantly reduces its flotation effect in alpine areas [14]. In order to improve the difficulty of NaOl in dissolving at low temperatures, the research shows that the synergistic effect of two or more mixed collectors can better adapt to the environment of low-temperature flotation and realize the effective separation of diaspore and kaolinite [15,16]. Tert dodecyl mercaptan (TDM) is a non-ionic surfactant that can reduce the surface tension of the oil–water interface and improve the low-temperature solubility and selectivity of the collector [17,18]. However, as far as we know, the flotation behavior and adsorption mechanism of the NaOl and TDM mixed collector for diaspore and kaolinite at low temperatures has not been studied. Therefore, this paper studies the synergistic effect of the mixture of NaOl and TDM in bauxite low-temperature flotation in order to improve the low-temperature solubility and selectivity of NaOl, reduce consumption, and provide theoretical guidance for the wide application of NaOl in the separation of diaspore and kaolinite.
In this paper, a novel mixed collector, including sodium oleate (NaOl) and tert dodecyl mercaptan (TDM), was prepared and used as a collector of diaspore at low temperatures. Its flotation performance of diaspore and kaolinite at different temperatures was evaluated by flotation tests of pure minerals and artificial mixed minerals. In addition, the adsorption mechanism of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM on the surface of diaspore and kaolinite at 283 K was studied by surface tension measurements, Zeta potential determinations and XPS analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Similar to our previous studies, the pure minerals used in the experiments were diaspore and kaolinite, respectively. The results of the X-ray diffraction (D8 discover, Bruke, Karlsruhe, Germany) and chemical composition of the diaspore and kaolinite are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, respectively. The results show that the purity of the diaspore and kaolinite was more than 90%. After handpicking massive ores, artificial crushing, sorting and grounding in porcelain ball milling, 38–74 μm minerals were screened out for flotation. The screened minerals were ground to −5 μm by an agate mortar for Zeta potential measurements and XPS analysis.

2.2. Reagents

Sodium oleate (NaOl) and tert dodecyl mercaptan (TDM) were used as collectors, both of which were analytically pure products. The mixed collector NaOl/TDM was prepared and used on the spot to avoid reagent failure. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were used as pH regulators. The water used in all the tests was deionized water (Resistivity = 18.3 MΩ·cm).

2.3. Flotation Tests

The single mineral flotation test was carried out in a FMG hanging cell flotation machine (Shunze, Hunan, China). A 2 g mineral sample was weighed and put into the flotation cell, 35 mL of deionized water was added, the pH value was adjusted by HCl or NaOH, the slurry was adjusted for 3 min, the collector was added and then the flotation was conducted for 3 min. After flotation, the foam product and the product in the tank were filtered, dried and weighed, respectively, and the flotation recovery rate was calculated. The flotation process is shown in Figure 2.
The flotation process of the artificial mixed mineral was the same as that of the single mineral flotation. After the flotation was finished, the foam products and the products in the tank were filtered, dried and weighed. The contents of Al2O3 and SiO2 were analyzed, and the flotation recovery rate was calculated. The mass ratio of diaspore to kaolinite in the artificial mixed minerals was 3:1, and the A/S ratio of mixed minerals was 3.49.

2.4. Surface Tension Measurements

The surface tensions of the different collectors in the solution were measured by the platinum hanging sheet method with a K100 surface tension instrument (Kruss, Hamburg, Germany). The test temperature was 283 K. Before the test, the platinum hanger was cleaned with deionized water and alcohol, respectively, and then put into the flame of the outer ring of the alcohol lamp to remove the residual substances from the last measurement. The number of measurements was set to three, so each result was the average of the measurements.

2.5. Zeta Potential Determinations

The Zeta potentials before and after the interaction between the collectors and minerals at 283 K were measured by an LA-960V2 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). A 30 mg ore sample was weighed and then added to 40 mL of a potassium chloride (KCl) solution (concentration = 0.01 M). The slurry was stirred up for 3 min, and its pH was adjusted. After the pH was stabilized, the collector was added, and then the pulp was stirred for 3 min to fully interact with the mineral. After the stirred pulp was kept still for 1 min, the supernatant was extracted with a syringe to measure the Zeta potential, and the result was the average value of three measurements.

2.6. XPS Measurements

A K-Alpha+ (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA) X-ray photoelectron spectrometer was used to measure the energy spectrum before and after the interaction between the reagents and the minerals at 283 K. A total of 0.5 g of the sample was added to 35 mL of deionized water. The pulp pH was adjusted, and the collector was added. The pulp was stirred for 40 min and then was allowed to stand for 40 min. After the mineral was completely settled, the supernatant was carefully separated out and then washed three times with deionized water with the same pH value. The solid sample was dried in a vacuum oven at 283 K for 24 h, pressed into tablets and tested.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Micro-Flotation

The preliminary single mineral flotation tests showed that when the temperature was 298 K, the selection effect of the NaOl/TDM collector on the diaspore was better than that of NaOl or TDM alone [19]. Previous studies [19] have shown that the optimal pH conditions for NaOl, TDM and the mixed collector NaOl/TDM are 10, 9 and 9, respectively. The optimum molar ratio of NaOl to TDM in the mixed collector is 8:2 at 298 K. Figure 3 shows the effect of the dosage of NaOl, TDM and NaOl/TDM on the flotation recovery of the diaspore and kaolinite under the optimal pH condition at 298 K in the single mineral flotation tests. As shown in Figure 3, when the collector concentration is less than 0.1 mM, the flotation recovery of the diaspore increases rapidly with the increase in the collector dosage. When the collector concentration is more than 0.1 mM, the increase rate of recovery slows down. Under different collector concentrations, the recovery of diaspore by NaOl/TDM is higher than that by NaOl. When the collector concentration is 0.1 mM, the recoveries of NaOl and NaOl/TDM of the diaspore are 84.62% and 91.35% respectively. For kaolinite flotation, the recovery of kaolinite increases slowly with the increase in collector concentration. Under various concentration conditions, the recovery of kaolinite under the action of NaOl/TDM is much lower than that of NaOl. When the collector concentration is 0.1 mM, the recovery of kaolinite is 16.7%. At this time, the recovery of kaolinite by NaOl/TDM is only 11.5%. In addition, the ability of TDM to collect diaspore and kaolinite is weak, so it is not suitable to be used as a collector alone. Therefore, compared with the single collector NaOl or TDM, NaOl/TDM has a better separation effect on diaspore and kaolinite at 298 K.
Another remarkable feature of NaOl is that the collector performance decreases sharply at low temperatures. In order to further explore the performance of NaOl/TDM, the relationship between the flotation temperature and collector performance was explored. Figure 4 shows the effect of the flotation temperature on the flotation of diaspore and kaolinite with NaOl or NaOl/TDM. As shown in Figure 4, NaOl is extremely sensitive to temperature. When the pulp temperature increases from 283 K to 308 K, the recovery of diaspore increases rapidly from 30.33% to 95.65%. The recovery rate of kaolinite also increases slowly with the increase in temperature. When the pulp temperature increases from 283 K to 308 K, the recovery rate of kaolinite increases slowly from 6.55% to 30.25%.
Under the action of NaOl/TDM, the recovery of diaspore increases with the increase in temperature. When the pulp temperature increases from 283 K to 308 K, the recovery of diaspore increases rapidly from 55.28% to 97.50%. When the temperature is lower than 293 K, the ability of NaOl/TDM to collect diaspore is significantly higher than that of NaOl alone. The addition of TDM can effectively reduce the sensitivity of NaOl to temperature. The recovery rate of kaolinite also increases slowly with the increase in temperature. When the pulp temperature increases from 283 K to 308 K, the recovery rate of kaolinite increases slowly from 5.56% to 19.26%. When the temperature is lower than 293 K, the collection capacity of NaOl/TDM for kaolinite is slightly lower than that of NaOl. Therefore, the separation effect of NaOl/TDM on diaspore and kaolinite is much better than that of NaOl at low temperatures.
In order to further explore the flotation effect of NaOl/TDM at low temperatures, the separation effect of NaOl/TDM on mixed minerals of diaspore and kaolinite at specific pH values at 283 K was studied. Figure 5 shows the separation results of mixed minerals as a function of pH at 283 K. As shown in Figure 5, the recovery of Al2O3 using NaOl first increases and then decreases with the increase in pH. When the pH is 10, it reaches the maximum of 70.99%. The A/S of the concentrate decreases with the increase in the pH value. When the pulp pH increases from 8 to 11, the A/S decreases from 11.35 to 8.93. When NaOl/TDM is used, the recovery of Al2O3 first increases and then decreases with the increase in pH. When the pH is 9, it reaches the maximum value of 73.55%. The A/S of the concentrate decreases with the increase in the pH value. When the pulp pH increases from 8 to 11, the A/S decreases from 13.05 to 10.75. By comparing the recovery and A/S of Al2O3 treated by NaOl (pH = 10) and NaOl/TDM (pH = 9), the A/S ratios of the concentrate are 9.75 and 11.85, respectively, and the recovery of Al2O3 with NaOl/TDM is 2.56%—higher than that of NaOl. The flotation test of mixed binary minerals further proves that, compared with NaOl, NaOl/TDM can better realize the effective separation of diaspore and kaolinite at low temperatures.

3.2. Surface Tension Measurements

The surface tension of the collector is one of the parameters to measure collector performance in flotation. The surface tensions of NaOl, TDM and NaOl/TDM at different concentrations at 283 K were measured, and the concentration-related function is plotted in Figure 6. The following relations—1–3—are used to calculate the different surface and micelle formation parameters of the three collectors at 283 K. All parameters are shown in Table 2.
Γ m a x = - 1 2.303 n R T ( γ l o g C ) T × 1 0 - 3
A m i n = 1 0 18 Γ m a x N A
Δ G m 0 = R T l n X C M C
where the value 2.303 is the approximate value of ln (10), n is 1 for mixed-collector systems and 2 for single-collector systems [20], R is the universal gas constant (8.31 J mol−1·K−1), T is the absolute temperature (298.15 K), ( γ / l o g C ) T is the slope of the linear portion of the curve below the critical micelle concentration (CMC) at 283 K [21], NA is the Avogadro number ( 6.02 × 10 23 molecules), XCMC is the measured critical micelle concentration (CMC) value [22], Γ m a x is in (mol/m2), Amin is in nm2 and Δ G m 0 is in kJ/mol.
As shown in Figure 6, the CMC and γ C M C of TDM are relatively large, indicating that its surface hydrophobicity is weak and that its surface activity is relatively low. This also explains the low flotation recovery when TDM is used as a single collector at low temperatures. By comparing the surface tension curves of the NaOl and NaOl/TDM solutions, the mixed collector NaOl/TDM is found to be more efficient than the single collector NaOl in decreasing the air−water interfacial tension, particularly in low surfactant concentration conditions. This shows that the formation of the micelle effect of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM has a synergistic effect, which improves the reagent activity at low temperatures and improves the flotation effect.
The saturation adsorption value ( Γ m a x ) and average minimum area per molecule ( A m i n ) are considered to be important indicators in evaluating the molecular bulk density of collectors at the air–liquid interface [23]. Generally speaking, the larger the Γ m a x value or the smaller the A m i n value of the collector, the denser the molecular arrangement of the collector on the air–water interface. In Table 2, the Γ m a x value and A m i n value of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM are respectively greater than and less than those of NaOl as a collector alone, which indicates that the density of the reagent molecules in the mixed collector system is higher than that in the NaOl system at 283 K. The order of the standard Gibbs free energy change for micelle formation at CMC ( Δ G m 0 ) of the three surfactants is NaOl / TDM > NaOl > TDM at 283 K. The Δ G m 0 value of the mixed collector is the lowest, which indicates that the hydrophobic association and collection ability of the mixed collector are better than those of a single collector at 283 K.

3.3. Zeta Potential Determinations

Zeta potential determinations before and after the interaction between minerals and reagents is an effective means to find the changes in the electrical properties on the mineral surface, explain the adsorption phenomenon and analyze the adsorption mechanism. The Zeta potentials of diaspore and kaolinite in the presence of various flotation reagents at 283 K are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. In the absence of a collector, the isoelectric points (IEP) of diaspore and kaolinite are found to be pH 6.9 and 3.8, respectively, which agree with the previous investigations [1,24,25].
As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, in the presence of NaOl, the Zeta potentials of diaspore and kaolinite are shifted negatively, which indicates that NaOl is adsorbed on the surface of diaspore and kaolinite. Moreover, the decrease in the Zeta potentials of diaspore is greater than that of kaolinite, which means that NaOl has a stronger affinity for diaspore than kaolinite. When TDM is added alone, the Zeta potentials of diaspore and kaolinite are shifted positively, indicating that TDM is adsorbed on the surfaces of the two minerals. In the presence of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM, the Zeta potential of diaspore is more negative than that of NaOl alone, indicating that the interaction between the mixed collector NaOl/TDM and the diaspore surface is stronger. After the addition of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM, the Zeta potential on the surface of kaolinite is shifted slightly positive compared to that of NaOl alone, indicating that the interaction of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM on the surface of kaolinite is weaker than that of NaOl alone. This may be because the adsorption of TDM on the kaolinite surface in the NaOl/TDM collector is very weak and affects the adsorption of NaOl on the kaolinite surface.

3.4. XPS Analysis

XPS analysis can determine the chemical states of mineral surface elements, which is of great significance in analyzing the adsorption phenomenon on the mineral surface in the process of flotation. In order to further explore the adsorption mechanism of three reagents on the mineral surface, the atomic compositions of the diaspore and kaolinite interfaces treated or untreated by NaOl or NaOl/TDM are listed in Table 3, and the binding energy of Al 2p in the diaspore and kaolinite samples before and after the adsorption of the collector was measured by XPS analysis, as shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10.
Table 3 shows that, after NaOl treatment, the atomic concentrations of O, Al and Si decrease, and the atomic concentration of C increases at 283 K. Therefore, it is inferred that NaOl can adsorb on the surface of diaspore and kaolinite at 283 K. The change values of the atomic concentrations of C, O and Al on the surface of diaspore are much larger than those on the surface of kaolinite, which indicates that the adsorption capacity of NaOl on the surface of diaspore is higher than that of kaolinite at 283 K. This is consistent with the previous results of the Zeta potential measurements. Compared with diaspore treated by NaOl alone, the atomic concentrations of C, O, Al and Si on the surface of diaspore change more after the NaOl/TDM treatment at 283 K, which shows that the total adsorption capacity of NaOl/TDM is higher than that of NaOl alone at low temperatures. On the contrary, the change value of the atomic concentrations of C, O, Al and Si on the surface of kaolinite after the NaOl/TDM treatment at 283 K is very similar to that of NaOl, which indicates that the collection capacity of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM on kaolinite is not improved compared with that of NaOl. In addition, the atomic concentration of S detected on the surface of diaspore and kaolinite is very low, which indicates that the TDM in the mixed collector NaOl/TDM has adsorption on the mineral surface, but its adsorption capacity is limited.
Figure 9 displays a peak of diaspore at 74.23 eV. When diaspore is treated by NaOl at 283 K, the peak has no obvious shift. This shows that the adsorption of NaOl on the surface of diaspore is not chemical adsorption at 283 K but may be caused by hydrogen bonding, which is consistent with the conclusions of other researchers [21]. When diaspore is treated by NaOl/TDM at 283 K, the peak still has no obvious shift. This shows that the adsorption form of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM on the diaspore surface is not chemical adsorption. It may be that the formation of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM micelle effect has a synergistic effect, which improves the agent activity at low temperatures and enhances the interaction of the hydrogen bond between NaOl/TDM and diaspore.
For kaolinite, as shown in Figure 10, after NaOl treatment, the peak appears at 74.68 eV, which is almost unchanged from the original peak at 74.73 eV. In addition, after NaOl/TDM treatment, the peak appears at 74.73 eV, and there is still no significant change. This shows that the addition of TDM cannot change the adsorption form of NaOl on the surface of kaolinite at 283 K.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the effect of a new mixed collector, NaOl/TDM (the molar ratio 8:2 of NaOl:TDM), on the separation of diaspore and kaolinite at 283 K was investigated. The properties of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM and its adsorption mechanism on diaspore and kaolinite were studied by surface tension tests, Zeta potentials and XPS analysis. According to the experimental results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
The flotation results show that the mixed collector NaOl/TDM has a good collection ability for diaspore and a good selectivity for kaolinite at low temperatures. The NaOl/TDM collector can effectively separate diaspore and kaolinite under alkaline conditions at 283 K.
The results of the surface tension tests show that the molecular density, hydrophobic association ability and collection ability of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM are better than those of the single collector at 283 K. In addition, the formation of the micelle effect of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM has a synergistic effect, which improves the reagent activity at low temperatures and improves the flotation effect.
The results of the Zeta potentials and the XPS analysis show that the total adsorption capacity of the mixed collector NaOl/TDM on the surface of diaspore at low temperatures is higher than that of NaOl, and the adsorption capacity on the surface of kaolinite is similar to that of NaOl. The mixed collector NaOl/TDM may be adsorbed on the surface of diaspore and kaolinite by a hydrogen bond at 283 K.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.M. and L.O.; methodology, X.M. and C.W.; validation, X.M. and X.Y.; formal analysis, X.M. and J.L.; investigation, X.M. and S.Y.; resources, L.O. and Y.F.; data curation, X.M. and H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.M. and Z.D.; writing—review and editing, X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51674291).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support of the Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Calcium-containing Mineral Resources (No. 2018TP1002).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, Z.; Sun, C.; Kou, J.; Fu, G.; Qi, X. Experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study on the effect of polyacrylamide on bauxite flotation. Miner. Eng. 2021, 164, 106810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, N.; Ejtemaei, M.; Nguyen, A.V.; Zhou, C. XPS analysis of the surface chemistry of sulfuric acid-treated kaolinite and diaspore minerals with flotation reagents. Miner. Eng. 2019, 136, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, C.; Ansheng, F.; Zhenxu, G.; Xuefeng, C.; Yuehua, H. Flotation behavior of four dodecyl tertiary amines as collectors of diaspore and kaolinite. Min. Sci. Technol. 2011, 21, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yan, W.; Liu, C.; Ai, G.; Feng, Q.; Zhang, W. Flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using mixed collectors. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 169, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, Q.; Cheng, J.; Wen, S.; Li, C.; Bai, S.; Liu, D. A mixed collector system for phosphate flotation. Miner. Eng. 2015, 78, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lyu, F.; Sun, W.; Khoso, S.A.; Zhang, C.; Liu, R.; Wang, L.; Gao, J. Adsorption mechanism of propyl gallate as a flotation collector on scheelite: A combined experimental and computational study. Miner. Eng. 2019, 133, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, Y.-F.; Yin, W.-Z.; Dong, X.-S.; Sun, C.-Y.; Yang, B.; Yao, J.; Li, H.-L.; Li, C.; Kim, H. New insights into the flotation responses of brucite and serpentine for different conditioning times: Surface dissolution behavior. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2021, 28, 1898–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, H.; Xu, L.-H.; Hu, Y.-H.; Wang, D.-Z.; Li, C.-K.; Meng, W.; Wang, X.-J. Flotation and adsorption of quaternary ammonium cationic collectors on diaspore and kaolinite. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 2528–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.; Zhou, M.; Xia, L.; Fu, W.; Zhou, W.; Yang, S. The utilization of citric acid as a depressant for the flotation separation of barite from fluorite. Miner. Eng. 2020, 156, 106491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, C.; Ni, C.; Yao, J.; Chang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, G.; Luo, X.; Yang, L.; Ren, Z.; Shao, P.; et al. Hydroxypropyl amine surfactant: A novel flotation collector for efficient separation of scheelite from calcite. Miner. Eng. 2021, 167, 106898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.; Gao, Z.; Gao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Sun, W. Flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using mixed cationic/anionic collectors. Miner. Eng. 2016, 98, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, X.; Xie, J.; Huang, G.; Li, C. Low-temperature performance of cationic collector undecyl propyl ether amine for ilmenite flotation. Miner. Eng. 2017, 114, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, H.; Qin, W.; Chen, C.; Liu, R. Interactions Between Sodium Oleate and Polyoxyethylene Ether and the Application in the Low-Temperature Flotation of Scheelite at 283 K. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2016, 19, 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, C.; Zhu, H.; Sun, W.; Hu, Y.; Qin, W.; Liu, R. Synergetic Effect of the Mixed Anionic/Non-Ionic Collectors in Low Temperature Flotation of Scheelite. Minerals 2017, 7, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, K.; Gu, G.; Yan, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Xu, L. Flotation of fine pyrite by using N-dodecyl mercaptan as collector in natural pH pulp. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 1571–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, S.; Xu, Y.; Liu, C.; Soraya, D.A.D.; Li, C.; Li, H. Investigations on the synergistic effect of combined NaOl/SPA collector in ilmenite flotation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 628, 127267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiao, F.; Wu, J.; Qin, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, R. Interactions of tert dodecyl mercaptan with sphalerite and effects on its flotation behavior. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 506, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Z.; Teng, Q.; Liu, J.; Yang, W.; Hu, D.; Liu, S. Use of NaOL and CTAB mixture as collector in selective flotation separation of enstatite and magnetite. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 570, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Man, X.; Ou, L.; Wang, C.; Jin, S.; Ma, X. Flotation Separation of Diaspore and Kaolinite by Using a Mixed Collector of Sodium Oleate-Tert Dodecyl Mercaptan. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tian, J.; Xu, L.; Deng, W.; Jiang, H.; Gao, Z.; Hu, Y. Adsorption mechanism of new mixed anionic/cationic collectors in a spodumene-feldspar flotation system. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017, 164, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, L.; Hu, Y.; Tian, J.; Wu, H.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z. Synergistic effect of mixed cationic/anionic collectors on flotation and adsorption of muscovite. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 492, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiong, W.; Deng, J.; Chen, B.; Deng, S.; Wei, D. Flotation-magnetic separation for the beneficiation of rare earth ores. Miner. Eng. 2018, 119, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, Y.-R.; Li, W.; Feng, R. Preparation and performance of 4-alkyl-4,4-bis(hydroxycarbamoyl) carboxylic acid for flotation separation of diaspore against aluminosilicates. Miner. Eng. 2011, 24, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiang, H.; Sun, Z.; Xu, L.; Hu, Y.; Huang, K.; Zhu, S. A comparison study of the flotation and adsorption behaviors of diaspore and kaolinite with quaternary ammonium collectors. Miner. Eng. 2014, 65, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, L.; Wang, S.; Zhong, H.; Liu, G. A novel surfactant 2-amino-6-decanamidohexanoic acid: Flotation performance and adsorption mechanism to diaspore. Miner. Eng. 2016, 93, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the purified samples: (a) diaspore; (b) kaolinite (D = Diaspore, K = Kaolinite).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the purified samples: (a) diaspore; (b) kaolinite (D = Diaspore, K = Kaolinite).
Minerals 12 00891 g001
Figure 2. Flowsheet of the flotation tests.
Figure 2. Flowsheet of the flotation tests.
Minerals 12 00891 g002
Figure 3. Effect of the collector dosage on the diaspore and kaolinite flotation recovery with NaOl (pH = 10), TDM (pH = 9) or NaOl/TDM (pH = 9, NaOl:TDM mole ratio = 8:2) as collectors at 298 K.
Figure 3. Effect of the collector dosage on the diaspore and kaolinite flotation recovery with NaOl (pH = 10), TDM (pH = 9) or NaOl/TDM (pH = 9, NaOl:TDM mole ratio = 8:2) as collectors at 298 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the flotation temperature on diaspore and kaolinite flotation with NaOl (pH = 10, dosage = 0.1 mM) or NaOl/TDM (pH = 9, dosage = 0.1 mM, NaOl:TDM mole ratio = 8:2).
Figure 4. Effect of the flotation temperature on diaspore and kaolinite flotation with NaOl (pH = 10, dosage = 0.1 mM) or NaOl/TDM (pH = 9, dosage = 0.1 mM, NaOl:TDM mole ratio = 8:2).
Minerals 12 00891 g004
Figure 5. Separation results of mixed minerals under the action of the NaOl (pH = 10, dosage = 0.1 mM) or NaOl/TDM (pH = 9, dosage = 0.1 mM, NaOl:TDM mole ratio = 8:2) collector at 283 K.
Figure 5. Separation results of mixed minerals under the action of the NaOl (pH = 10, dosage = 0.1 mM) or NaOl/TDM (pH = 9, dosage = 0.1 mM, NaOl:TDM mole ratio = 8:2) collector at 283 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g005
Figure 6. Surface tension for the individual collectors NaOl and TDM and the mixed collector NaOl/TDM at 283 K.
Figure 6. Surface tension for the individual collectors NaOl and TDM and the mixed collector NaOl/TDM at 283 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g006
Figure 7. Zeta potentials of diaspore in the presence of various flotation reagents at 283 K.
Figure 7. Zeta potentials of diaspore in the presence of various flotation reagents at 283 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g007
Figure 8. Zeta potentials of kaolinite in the presence of various flotation reagents at 283 K.
Figure 8. Zeta potentials of kaolinite in the presence of various flotation reagents at 283 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g008
Figure 9. XPS spectra of the Al 2p layer of diaspore with different collectors at 283 K.
Figure 9. XPS spectra of the Al 2p layer of diaspore with different collectors at 283 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g009
Figure 10. XPS spectra of the Al 2p layer of kaolinite with different collectors at 283 K.
Figure 10. XPS spectra of the Al 2p layer of kaolinite with different collectors at 283 K.
Minerals 12 00891 g010
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the purified samples (mass fraction, %).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the purified samples (mass fraction, %).
SampleAl2O3SiO2TiO2Fe2O3CaOMgOK2ONa2O
Diaspore80.770.892.760.7560.010.0530.0080.025
Kaolinite33.6845.440.970.880.240.0770.89-
Table 2. Surface and thermodynamic properties of NaOl, TDM and NaOl/TDM at 283 K.
Table 2. Surface and thermodynamic properties of NaOl, TDM and NaOl/TDM at 283 K.
SurfactantsCMC(mol/L) γ C M C (mN/m) Γ m a x (mol/m2) A m i n ( nm 2 ) Δ G m 0 ( kJ / mol )
NaOl2 × 10−325.878.84 × 10−71.8814.62
TDM8 × 10−345.612.01 × 10−60.8311.36
NaOl/TDM1 × 10−325.131.55 × 10−61.0716.25
Table 3. Atomic concentration of elements for mineral interfaces, as determined by XPS at 283 K.
Table 3. Atomic concentration of elements for mineral interfaces, as determined by XPS at 283 K.
SamplesAtomic Concentration of Elements (Atomic %)
COAlSiS
Diaspore18.5857.3719.714.33-
Diaspore + NaOl47.5136.2212.963.31-
a28.93−21.15−6.75−1.02-
Diaspore18.5857.3719.714.33-
Diaspore + NaOl/TDM53.4232.5211.452.450.17
a34.84−24.85−8.26−1.88-
Kaolinite10.1461.3813.2115.27-
Kaolinite + NaOl21.2653.1612.1613.42-
a11.12−8.22−1.05−1.85-
Kaolinite10.1461.3813.2115.27-
Kaolinite + NaOl/TDM21.2952.8312.3413.470.08
a11.15−8.55−0.87−1.80-
a is defined as the value before treatment minus that of the NaOl or NaOl/TDM treatment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Man, X.; Wang, C.; Yu, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Fu, Y.; Dong, Z.; Zhi, H.; Ou, L. Low-Temperature Flotation Separation of Diaspore from Kaolinite by Using a Mixed Collector. Minerals 2022, 12, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070891

AMA Style

Man X, Wang C, Yu S, Yang X, Liu J, Fu Y, Dong Z, Zhi H, Ou L. Low-Temperature Flotation Separation of Diaspore from Kaolinite by Using a Mixed Collector. Minerals. 2022; 12(7):891. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070891

Chicago/Turabian Style

Man, Xiaofei, Chenliang Wang, Shichao Yu, Xiaofeng Yang, Jianjun Liu, Yafeng Fu, Zhenhai Dong, Hui Zhi, and Leming Ou. 2022. "Low-Temperature Flotation Separation of Diaspore from Kaolinite by Using a Mixed Collector" Minerals 12, no. 7: 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070891

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop